Panoramio images edit

Hello!

I have noticed that you have added your username to some images that I have transferred from Panoramio. I did not know this, if I had, then I did it myself. All in all thanks for your files and your contributions.

Besides, I have activated your autopatrol rights on Commons. I do not see a problem with it. Happy editing! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Thank you so much for everything! Greetings from Voronezh! --Insider (talk) 18:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Time zone map edit

Hello,

I saw, you did some corrects to time zones of Europe map (here). I saw one small mistake there. Faroe Islands (a few dots between Iceland and Great Britain) may belong to Denmark, but they have different time zone - Western European Time (+1 one hour in summer same as Portugal, Ireland or Great Britain. I don't know how to correct that mistake, so I would be very glad if you deal with it. :)

Greets! Viltharis (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Fixed. Thanks. --Insider (talk) 07:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Категоризация edit

Не могли бы Вы при категоризации сразу добавлять ещё и географическую категорию, например Category:Buildings in Omsk или Category:Kislovodsk? Как я понимаю, с тулзами это времени практически не отнимает, а эти категории всё равно нужны. Огромное спасибо в любом случае за категоризацию, может, к началу следующей недели всё разберём.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

А разве эти категории (Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kislovodsk) не являются подкатегориями географических категорий (Category:Kislovodsk)? В таком случае я точно не вижу смысла в дублировании (как сейчас получилось с категорией Category:Minusinsk. Со зданиями еще более менее понятно только не во всех категориях городов они есть. --Insider (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Сейчас по некоторым городам являются (в идеале они уйдут в категории типа Category:Culture in xxx, но на данный момент таких очень мало), но по тем же Кисловодску и Минусинску не сейчас, так позже придётся создавать отдельные категории Category:Buildings in Minusinsk, и туда она уже не попадёт (конечно, подавляющая часть памятников культурного наследия - задния, но всё-таки не все, по Кисловодску, например, парк есть, так что, в принципе, это другая линия категоризации). А если сейчас в изображения эти категории не проставить, то они все будут лежать внути категории Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Minusinsk, и вспомнят ли о них при создании категории зданий, я не знаю.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Epiphany Church (Voronezh) edit

Посмотрите, пожалуйста, я правильно понимаю, что в этой категории на самом деле сложены две разные церкви?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Да, я выделил категорию Category:Epiphany Church (Gubaryovo) для церкви в Губарёво. --Insider (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Магистраль 509.jpg edit

 
File:Магистраль 509.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Insider,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 08:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Korzunovo An-2.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Korzunovo An-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Korzunovo An-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

russavia (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Усадьба Севрюгова 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good QI - maybe the last documentation of this monument...--Isiwal 22:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Адмиралтейская церковь с Петровского острова.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you increase the contrast please? The blacks don't seem very black. Mattbuck 19:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Done --A.Savin 21:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Better. Mattbuck 15:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Reply

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

File:Kotenok s ulitsy Lizyukova Voronezh 2005.jpg edit

 
File:Kotenok s ulitsy Lizyukova Voronezh 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clarissy. 16:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


File:Waiting for marshrutka.jpg edit

Hi Insider, I assume that the thing in the above right corner of this image is a display/poster, right? Or is it a mirror? --Túrelio (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. This billboard.--Insider (talk) 07:33, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. But, then we have a problem. Russia, where this billboard is located, has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright for works of art in public space. As the photo on the billboard is surely recent, it's copyrighted. So, you might blank the content of the billboard, if the image then is still of use, or it has to be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have not thought about it. Сropped. --Insider (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Great. I've hidden the original uncropped version now. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Воздвиженская церковь 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 13:36, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Kutaisi_Airport,_from_inside.jpg edit

Вот тут на источнике ни где указан ©, так можно ли считать его и других таких файлов свободными ?

--Giorgi Balakhadze   13:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Нет, нельзя. По умолчанию все фотографии и произведения охраняются авторским правом. Свободная лицензия должна быть явно указана на сайте (примеры: [1], [2], [3]). --Insider (talk) 13:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Stop, marking this file File:Georgia.gif, go to the link and click [usage] above the medium Georgian flag!--Giorgi Balakhadze   15:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possible deletion of non-FOP photo / Belarus edit

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus for targets whose architects/ designers are still alive or it is less than 50 years since their death. Kindly note that citation use might still be allowed. In such a case this photo should be saved to and used from national wikipedia (as it is likely to be deleted in Commons). BR, Paju (talk) 22:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Insider,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

File:Тася Вилкова.jpg edit

 
File:Тася Вилкова.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 11:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Insider,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Армен Александрович Мерангулян edit

Приветствую! Беспокою по поводу данного файла. Вижу, что вранье (типа собственная работа + непонятные ссылки), просится на удаление, но сформулировать не могу. --kosun (talk) 07:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Привет. Так на КУ и вынесите. Самому себя сфотографировать проблематично.--Insider (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Я ж и пишу - причину сформулировать не могу -кроме подложного авторства ничего не придумывается. --kosun (talk) 04:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Так этого разве недостаточно? --Insider (talk) 10:17, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Доля русских в Крыму.png edit

 
File:Доля русских в Крыму.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.112.1.114 08:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Murmansk oblast administr.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Murmansk oblast administr.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, 1989 20:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Cirīša Reservoir edit

1st: Why You have moved this category? 2nd: Why to wrong name? Name of waterbody is lv:Ciriša ūdenskrātuve (all short "i"). --Kikos (talk) 11:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

1) Commons uses English for the names of categories. 2) Apparently my mystake. --Insider (talk) 12:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Вики любит Землю 2015 edit

 
noframe

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

оказались среди 153 из более чем 8300 загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в шорт-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!

Организаторы российской части Вики любит Землю 2015

Вики любит памятники 2015 edit

 
noframe

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

оказались среди 1083 из почти 24 тысяч загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015

File:Мурманск ПИНРО.jpg edit

 
File:Мурманск ПИНРО.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herostratus (talk) 14:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Uspensko-Bogorodichny Monastery.jpg edit

G'day Insider, I have a question about this monastery, as I believe a photograph of it might be appropriate for the en:Josip Broz Tito article on WP. I am wondering if it was this monastery that operated as a hospital for prisoners of war during WWI and which Tito was nursed back to health in after being wounded. Any idea if this is the right one? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello! See File:Комплекс зданий земской больницы.JPG (Russian: Комплекс зданий земской больницы; English: The complex of the zemstvo hospital). I think this is what you need. P.S. On the map. --Insider (talk) 06:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much! Regards, Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open! edit

 

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Insider,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Protected areas of Russia/3610021 and others edit

► Protected areas of Russia/3610021‎ (2 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/3610024‎ (2 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/3610077‎ (3 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/3610086‎ (2 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/3610092‎ (1 plik)
► Protected areas of Russia/3610276‎ (1 plik)
► Protected areas of Russia/5110021‎ (14 plików)
► Protected areas of Russia/5110045‎ (2 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/5110047‎ (4 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/5110048‎ (2 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/5210403‎ (4 pliki)
► Protected areas of Russia/7010102‎ (1 plik)
► Protected areas of Russia/7710161‎ (19 plików)

You have moved the category, but you have not emptied it. The redirected categories should be empty. This category (and other "Protected areas") depends on templates, so it must be done manually, it can not be done by Bot. Fix it, please.

Thanks in advance! Wieralee (talk) 09:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've fixed it. But some of them have been renamed not me. --Insider (talk) 10:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Дом, в котором в 1952-1965 гг. жил и работал ученый-биолог Маслов Николай Антонович 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 10:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:RussiaCentralNumbered RUS.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RussiaCentralNumbered RUS.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 20:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Karelia today rus.png edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Karelia today rus.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Рижское Водохранилище.jpg edit

 
File:Рижское Водохранилище.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 06:30, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests subpage categorization edit

Hi! When categorizing deletion requests subpages (e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Estàtua a Paavo Nurmi i Estadi Olímpic, Helsinki (febrer 2012) - panoramio.jpg), please place the categories between <noinclude></noinclude> tags, for example: <noinclude>[[Category:Finnish FOP cases/pending]]</noinclude> to prevent categorizing the deletion requests logs (e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/2016/12/28). In addition, please notice that any open requests should go to the /pending subcategory, i.e. Category:Finnish FOP cases/pending instead of Category:Finnish FOP cases. Best regards, ––Apalsola tc 22:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Unfortunately, in this case, it is impossible to use COM:HotCat. I think better to use a bot for that or ask the author to complement HotCat. For "pending"-tag: I'll try not to forget it. --Insider (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Champakkara canal - panoramio.jpg edit

 
File:Champakkara canal - panoramio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

lNeverCry 04:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your VFC installation method is deprecated edit

Hello Insider, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Губа Андреева.jpg edit

 
File:Губа Андреева.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.94.220.144 10:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Бука / Андрей Букин edit

Здравствуйте, а как вы определили, что на фото запечатлён сад Андрея Букина? Есть ли у вас, возможно, какие-то его контакты? Я только что создал Category:Photographs by Бука, в первую очередь для служебных целей: большинство файлов в ней надо перекатегоризировать, и так легче будет найти схожие. Но если Бука = Андрей Букин, то наверно, её стоит переименовать в Category:Photographs by Andrey Bukin... Плюс к этому, может подскажете, что делать с тремя фото картин из его панорамио? 1 2 3 Не знаю уж, корректно ли их категоризировать, как "Photographs by Бука/Andrey Bukin", но и не обладаю информацией, кто их писал. (Плюс четвёртая, которая пройдёт и как фото, и как картина.) 194.186.207.251 14:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Здравствуйте. По фотографиям на Panoramio (там есть фотографии его дачи и его самого[4][5][6]) и совпадению ника на форуме АртРоссия [7] (ссылки найти что-то сейчас не получается, закрылся или домен не оплатили), но вот косвенные[8] [9]. Думаю картины не его: аттрибуция в углу другие имена и фамилии. Вынес на удаление. --Insider (talk) 07:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Ага, спасибо! Думаю, вполне достаточное обоснование для переименования Бука > Andrey Bukin. Сможете переименовать категорию и перекинуть файлы? Таки Cat-a-lot из-под IP недоступен(( 194.186.207.223 08:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
  Done. --Insider (talk) 06:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image update edit

This map: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_winners_of_the_Ice_Hockey_World_Championships.svg hasn't been updated; Sweden reached its 10th gold last year, so it should be in another color. (And if Switzerland wins tomorrow's final, they'll need a new color too afterwards :P) I don't have any program to update the map, and you did the update last time (in 2012) so I figured you might be willing to help. Regards! -- Lejman (talk) 19:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Lejman, thank you! Fixed! --Insider (talk) 07:26, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Playing with edit-war edit

Please do not edit-war. The note what I've added speaks about usage of a file in Wikipedia not about uploading or its existence on Commons. Be more cautious and discreet when reverting others' edits.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 08:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Also, there is a difference between Wikipedia Projects and Wikimedia Projects--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 08:42, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Памятник Ленину В. И. в Астрахани.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Памятник И. Д. Папанину.JPG edit

 
File:Памятник И. Д. Папанину.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Russian visa on arrival.PNG edit

 
File:Russian visa on arrival.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cherkash (talk) 22:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Копия Эйфелевой башни в Воронеже.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 08:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open! edit

 

Dear Insider,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

 
File:Памятник И. Н. Ульянову в Астрахани.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:World 1898 empires colonies territory.png edit

Hi there, could you also change the border between East Africa Protectorate and Italian Somaliland? The northern Jubaland region (Italian Trans-Juba) was only ceded by Britain in 1925 (see File:World 1920 empires colonies territory.png). Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:3003:2060:38bd:e80b:5729:bc45:a8c4 (talk • contribs)

Done! --Insider (talk) 07:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hello.
Can you color the Arctic islands (including Wrangel Island) as part of Russia, because all these islands were already part of Russia in 1898. The exceptions are the Franz Josef Islands which were annexed only in 1926 by the USSR and Svalbard which was still unclaimed/contested. Please see the File:Provinces of all Russia 1898.jpg and other maps and sources.
Thank you.
Maphobbyist (talk) 11:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi map creator, can you add Eastern Timor to the Portuguese, and Macau also please (after the 1920 map; see File:World 1920 empires colonies territory.png).
Many Tks.

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected files:

File:Countries driving on the left or right 1900.svg edit

Hello.

Can you make these corrections in File:Countries driving on the left or right 1900.svg?

In 1900, these places drove on the left and thus need to be colored in blue:

  • Finland
  • Austro-Hungarian Empire
  • Bosnia
  • Portuguese Timor (East Timor)
  • South Sudan (then part of Anglo-Egyptian Sudan)
  • Aden Colony (South Yemen)

In 1900, these places drove on the right and thus need to be colored in red:

  • Canadian province of Alberta
  • Turkish Ottoman province of North Yemen
  • Brazil
  • Paraguay
  • South Korea (then part of a unified Korea)

Please see the articles en:Left- and right-hand traffic and en:List of countries with left-hand traffic and the sources.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 10:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Maphobbyist, hello. I checked one country and immediately there was a mistake. Finland in 1900 was part of Russia. Finland changed direction in 1858. Please check all information. Insider (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hello. I have rechecked the sources. Apart from Finland, I have incorrectly included Brazil and Paraguay which also drove on the left in 1900 which I overlooked. But the other countries listed indeed need to be corrected. I have also checked them to be sure. Maphobbyist (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hello. I retract the request, because the map has been updated and corrected. Maphobbyist (talk) 17:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Russophone.svg edit

Hello.

In File:Russophone.svg can you color Kazakhstan and Kyrgystan in the same color as Russia etc., because in that file there are only two categories with countries where Russian is an official language and countries where Russian is widely spoken but is not official.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I retract the request, because Kazakhstan and Kyrgystan have been colored the same as Russia and Belarus. Maphobbyist (talk) 17:40, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Бюст С. М. Агафонова.JPG edit

 
File:Бюст С. М. Агафонова.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:УТП-2 edit

 

УТП-2 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 13:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Защитникам полуострова Рыбачий (crop).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Защитникам полуострова Рыбачий.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 22:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open! edit

 

Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.

С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.

С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")

Category:Globe_in_heraldry edit

 

Globe in heraldry has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


PointyOintment (talk) 18:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Update request for EEZ maps edit

Hello.

Can you add the border of South Sudan, fix the Sea of Okhotsk which is now wholly part of the Russian EEZ and fix the maritime border of Peru-Chile in:

The Caspian Sea, which is not subject to EEZ, is totally omitted, which is another problem. But if it is too difficult to fix, never mind.

Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 09:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello.
In all these maps, I have added the borders of South Sudan and Montenegro, and erased the hole called the "Peanut Hole" in the center of the Sea of Okhotsk which is now wholly part of the Russian EEZ since 2014, when the United Nations Commission recognized it as part of the Russian EEZ after the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was updated. I have erased the disputed border line around the southern Kuriles, not only because they are de-jure and internationally recognized as part of Russia, the Russian EEZ around them are likewise internationally recognized by the UN, even if Japan does not. I have left the Caspian Sea as it is, not only because it is not subject to the EEZ of the UN, I don't have the knowledge to draw the border, unless I can find the same type of map and dimensions with the Caspian Sea (to copy and paste it).
Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Good work, Maphobbyist! See also: Demarcation of the Russian-Norwegian border (2010) (in russian). It looks like this case, but there are differences. Insider (talk) 06:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Maphobbyist: . Insider (talk) 06:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for this information. I will try to find maps with the updated Russian-Norwegian EEZ borders. Maphobbyist (talk) 16:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Father stares at the hands of his five year-old daughter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—— Dodeeric (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Памятник С.М. Кирову в Ростове.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alexander Roumega (talk) 10:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Anatoly ivanov.JPG edit

 
File:Anatoly ivanov.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pr0n (talk) 11:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

{{Bashkortostan.ru}} edit

Добрый вечер. Поздравляю вас с Новым годом и Рождеством! Вы в 2010 году инициировали перевод сайта президента Башкортостана на лицензию CC BY 3.0, однако пометка о лицензировании материалов сайта появилась только в конце мая 2017 года уже с лицензией CC BY 4.0. Как вы думаете, согласны ли вы с тем, что материалы сайта, опубликованные до конца мая 2017 года, распространяются по лицензиям CC BY 3.0 и 4.0 по аналогии c Kremlin.ru до запуска нынешней версии сайта 8 апреля 2015 года? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Здравствуйте, MasterRus21thCentury. И вас с прошедшими праздниками! Я думаю что в таком случае все материалы сайта (кроме явных исключений) доступны по двум лицензиям CC BY 3.0 и CC BY 4.0. Почему должны быть какие-то ограничения по датам, или они явно даны на сайте? Insider (talk) 19:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Я об ограничениях по датам имею ввиду - если смотреть по архивированным версиям bashkortostan.ru, то действительно, первая версия с CC BY 4.0 датирована 3 июня 2017 года, последняя версия без лицензии - 11 апреля 2017 года. Значит, в этом промежутке времени официальный сайт Башкирии перевёл контент на CC BY 4.0, при этом точной даты неизвестно. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Но какая разница когда он разместил плашку если и по письму и по плашке по указанной лицензии доступны все материалы сайта? Или я что-то упускаю? Insider (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Строительство оборонительных сооружений на окраине Мурманска. 1941.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Мурманск Пожар после налета. 1942 г..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Демонстрация на пр. Ленина, 1940 г.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Anastasia_Kustova edit

 

Category:Anastasia_Kustova has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Emu (talk) 00:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Место съемки edit

Привет! Это станция Мурманск или нет? Michgrig (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Michgrig, привет! Это остановочный пункт 1448 км (68.967380, 33.063841). Виден спуск с пешеходного моста через ж/д. --Insider (talk) 19:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Спусков уже нет. --Insider (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Похоже, он уже не действует. Так? Michgrig (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
На сайте Октябрьской ЖД значится как действующая. А так если только грузовыми поездами или сезонными электричками (если такие остались), регулярная электричка на Кандалакшу не останавливается. В то же время будку какую-то на перроне построили не так давно (на фото нет). --Insider (talk) 19:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Спасибо! Michgrig (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

 
File:Памятник Ленину (Мурманск).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 19:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Воронежско-Козловская железная дорога edit

Привет! Я создал категорию и загрузил несколько фотографий: c:Category:Album of views of the Voronezh-Kozlov Railways. Начал разбираться с категориями и заметил Вашу загрузку: File:Воронежско-Козловская железная дорога 02 Козловская станция.jpg. Где были мои глаза :) В своём файле я удалил логотип (bvf в углу) и немного поправил уровни в фоторедакторе, поэтому вопрос: нужно ли удалять Вашу загрузку или оставить?

Вопросы по метаданным этой картинки: точно ли автор Альберт Генрих Иванович Мей? На самом альбоме указано фотоателье (Scherer, Nabholz and Co.), а кто именно фотограф - я не понял. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 07:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Привет, Andrew Krizhanovsky. Сложный вопрос. В целом мне не принципиально. В принципе, можно оставить обе, тем более раз у Вас неполная загрузка, да и фотографии кропнуты из страниц альбома. Оптимально их наверное кропнуть до самой фотографии (без подписи) и тогда они точно будут обе полезны. Ну и категории одну в другую вложить (например с уточнением в скобках cropped) - где-то встречал такой вариант. Что касается фотографа, точно не скажу откуда я это взял, давно было дело. Скорее всего из сообщения с того же форума. --Insider (talk) 15:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Хорошо, оставляем обе фотографии.
Кропнуть можно, хотя подпись в дореформенной орфографии смотрится хорошо, аутентично. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply