User talk:Chainwit./Archive 1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Chainwit.!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 04:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:TCDC logo Thailand.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TCDC logo Thailand.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:St Louis Hospital Bangkok Logo.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:St Louis Hospital Bangkok Logo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

File:คุณไข่มุกด์-ชูโต.jpg

 
File:คุณไข่มุกด์-ชูโต.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Ahimsa Jainism PNG.png

 
File:Ahimsa Jainism PNG.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Waheguru.jpg

Re. File:Waheguru.jpg that you have uploaded, I hope you realise that it has a spelling error. I have deleted it from all articles. — kashmīrī 10:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

@Kashmiri: Oh, thanks! But I'm not sure what that spelling error you mentioned is, could you specifically tell me? I'm just an amateur enthusiast in Indian culture, I might get something wrong. It would be great that you let know and I could fix it respectively. 😓 Thank you for your kindness! 😁

Jain Prateek Chihna

Hi. Thank You for SVG version. There is a issue with font at the bottom. The half-alphabets are not rendered properly. Compare it to 6 January version or File:Jain Prateek Chihna.jpg. Please fix it. Regards,-Nizil Shah (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Source for File:Joachim Grassi โจอาคิม แกรซี 02.jpg

Hi. Thanks for uploading the portrait of Joachim Grassi. Since it's a photo of a photo, could you please provide detail on the original source of the image? --Paul_012 (talk) 11:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Paul_012 (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shangri-la Hotel Bangkok 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 09:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sri Maha Mariamman Koyil Bangkok (Wat Khaek Silom) 2019 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Udom Thani วัดอุดมธานี นครนายก 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove problem tags

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


 
Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

File:Sirindhorn.jpg--Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

If you have a source please add it on the Source field in the file description page. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel: That was my false, I am pretty new to this. Thank you for your kind advice. ❤️

Chainwit. (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Licensing tutorial

สวัสดีครับ ผมได้เห็น File:Licensing tutorial th.jpg ซึ่งเข้าใจว่าเป็นโปสเตอร์ที่คุณ Chainwit. สร้างขึ้นหลังจากการสอบถามที่หน้าคุยของผมในวิกิพีเดียภาษาไทย แต่ขณะนี้ยังไม่แสดงผลใน Special:UploadWizard เท่าที่ตรวจในภาษาอื่น คาดว่าอาจเป็นเพราะทางหน้าดึงโปสเตอร์ที่ใช้นามสกุล SVG จึงแนะนำให้คุณ Chainwit. อัปโหลดโปสเตอร์อีกไฟล์หนึ่งโดยใช้นามสกุล SVG (File:Licensing tutorial th.svg) เผื่อจะสามารถแสดงผลได้ครับ --Geonuch (talk) 10:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

ชิ้นนี้ผมใช้แอพชื่อ Vectornator ทำในไอแพดน่ะครับ ซึ่งคอมมอนส์ไม่ให้อัปโหลดไฟล์ตระกูล .svg ที่ส่งออกจากแอพนี้ (ขึ้นคำเตือนว่า This SVG file contains an illegal namespace "http://vectornator.io".) แล้วพอผมลองไปแก้ใน txt ของมันโดยลบคำว่า vectornator ออกทั้งหมด ก็จะเป็นว่าไฟล์ไม่แสดงผลแทนน่ะครับ เดาว่าเดี๋ยวผมน่าจะต้องหาเวลาไปทำในคอมแล้วอัปใหม่อีกรอบนึงครับ ขอบคุณมาก ๆ นะครับ —Chainwit. (talk) 12:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
ถ้าทำผ่านคอมไม่น่ามีปัญหาอะไร เพราะวันสองวันก่อนหน้านี้ผมอัปโหลดไฟล์ SVG ได้ตามปกติ ไว้สะดวกเมื่อไรค่อยทำก็ได้ ในทางกลับกันต้องขอขอบคุณคุณ Chainwit. ที่ให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้ใช้ด้วยซ้ำไปครับ --Geonuch (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Suan Phlu Gingerbread House Monk Cells 2020 January วัดสวนพลู หมู่กุฏิขนมปังขิง 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haroon Mosque มัสยิดฮารูณ May8 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support OK --Podzemnik 21:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

 
File:2556 นายแพทย์ประดิษฐ สินธวณรงค์.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The licence provided is not applicable, and the source website clearly says "Copyright 2016 Department of Health "
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Bitterschoko (talk) 16:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

 
File:อาจารย์ อิทธิพล ตั้งโฉลก.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Paul 012.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! อนุสรณ์สถาน 14 ตุลา ถ่ายเมื่อกันยายน 2563 14 October 1973 Memorial 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chinese looking buildings in Yaowarat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:41, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ถนนอโศกมนตรี ( สุขุมวิท 21 ) Asok Montri Road (aka Sukhumwit 21 Alley).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sala Daeng BTS Station - Si Lom MRT Station Connection 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! วัดพระมหาไถ่ April2021 Holy Redeemer Church Bangkok 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice building and good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! วัดพระมหาไถ่ April2021 Holy Redeemer Church Bangkok 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice building and good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 22:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MahaNakhon, Bangkok.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2021May สถานีเซนต์หลุยส์ Saint Louis Station BTS 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Paul_012 (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iconsiam, Bangkok.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sathorn Unique Tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Building of Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Paul_012 (talk) 17:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ubosot of Wat Hong Rattanaram.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! อนุสาวรีย์ทหารอาสาสงครามโลกครั้งที่ 1 Bangkok Thai WWI Monument to The Expeditionary Force 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! สะพานหก Saphan Hok Bridge (October 2021) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! อนุสาวรีย์หมู (สหชาติ) - Pig Monument, Bangkok (October 2021) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! สะพานปีกุน - Pi Kun Bridge (October 2021) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

File: Waheguru.jpg - spelling error . It should be ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ . Please correct

File: Waheguru.jpg - spelling error . It should be ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ . Please correct 2405:201:5009:3162:D8F7:712F:9009:2C9B 23:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

File: Waheguru.jpg

Please correct spellings. It should be ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ 2405:201:5009:3162:D8F7:712F:9009:2C9B 23:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Avalokiteshvara of Chaiya statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Wat Bhoman Khunaram Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nakhon Lampang railway station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiang Rai Wat Chet Yot วัดเจ็ดยอด เชียงราย (October 2021) - Ubosot อุโบสถ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southwestern facade of Wat Phra That Doi Wao Chedi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apple Central World (at night).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the Rosewood Bangkok.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of the main cave of Wat Tham Phra, Chiang Rai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Kahoot in a classroom.jpg

 
File:Kahoot in a classroom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aasim (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daido Life Osaka Head Office Building, Osaka (Jan 2020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oriental Building, KL (2022-05) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Waterfront facade of Nativity of Our Lady Cathedral, Samut Songkhram Province.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern facade of National Museum Malaysia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minami-za Theatre, Kyoto (Jan 2020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medan Pasar (2022-05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support QI for me. --C messier 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gopuram door panels of Sri Mahamariamman Koyil Bangkok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Bhodijñāna Phitsanulok วัดโพธิญาณ พิษณุโลก - IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedi Yot Duan, Khao Samo Khleang เจดีย์ยอดด้วน เขาสมอแคลง - IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galta Ji Mandir (14-07-2022) img 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chhavi Niwas, City Palace Jaipur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 18:23, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hawa Mahal east facade (14-07-2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galta Ji Mandir (14-07-2022) img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Patrika Gate Jawahar Circle Jaipur 2022-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East facade Hawa Mahal Jaipur from ground level (July 2022) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galta Ji Mandir (14-07-2022) img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur Raj Mandir Cinema 15-07-2022 (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddhi-Siddhi Pol, City Palace Jaipur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galta Ji Mandir (14-07-2022) img 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rambagh Palace hotel Jaipur lobby courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Chedi Yot Thong วัดเจดีย์ยอดทอง (March 2022) - IMG 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leheriya Gate, City Palace Jaipur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City Palace Jaipur "Peacock Gate" 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Amphawan Chetiyaram (2022-06) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Chainwit./Archive 1".