Wikimedia Commons

User talk:GRuban/Archive 3

< User talk:GRuban
Latest comment: 4 years ago by GRuban in topic Hi about the cropped pic

File:Разрушенная мечеть в Юрт-Аухе.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Check, please. --Дагиров Умар (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

COM:VIRIN here

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear GRuban,

This is for your records in case you need to use US military photos. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

2 images

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear GRuban,

If you can help me just this once, please review these 2 images below uploaded by me.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

It's an honor! You review more images in a day than I do in a year!--GRuban (talk) 02:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

3 images

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Dear GRuban,

If you can help, please review these 3 images of a species that does not exist on Commons. Some are quality images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

  Done Those are beautiful! --GRuban (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you GRuban for your kind help. I know I am trusted and no one questions my image reviews but I feel much safer with an occasional second or third image reviewer of my uploads...just in case. There was a case 1-2 years ago where I reviewed many images from a youtube channel and then someone filed a DR and I was asked if the images from the YT channel were really free. By this time, the license at the YT channel had changed to ARR from CC BY 3.0. Luckily, I found a second separate reviewer who had reviewed one of this images and confirmed it was CC BY 3.0 when he reviewed them...like I did. A second or third reviewer is a bit safer. Yes, the images are absolutely amazing indeed! Good day from Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Oh no, I understand completely. As I wrote above, it's an honor! --GRuban (talk) 01:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Maurice de Hond met zijn laatste peilresultaten.webm

Latest comment: 5 years ago24 comments4 people in discussion

This web video has an archived internet link with a CC BY 3.0 license here: https://web.archive.org/web/20181112175327/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7YkcTSQdos

But I don't know if its safe for you or Alexis Jazz to pass it based on the Internet archive link since the video is not accessible. The description is unchanged. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

  • If a web video can be passed by this way, then maybe this large list can be reduced a little. However, Internet archive does not work for some of the video as I tried 1 or 2 of them. I will be away for most of the day tomorrow. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: User:Alexis Jazz/DWDD archief contains links to DWDD YouTube videos from 2017 to now, with green archive.org links where available. Sadly, most were not archived. I'm looking for more ways to find archived licenses. Those that were archived can be passed, the video itself doesn't have to be archived. It's beyond COM:PRP to assume a video could have changed. I don't think videos on YouTube even can be updated, but I'll look that one up. I can't pass anything myself as I'm not a license reviewer. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
You can delete any video you uploaded to your YouTube channel. You can’t replace a video since any new video uploads will get a new URL, but you can make changes to the existing video. Make changes links to make changes: only metadata can be replaced, not the video itself. Some effects can be added, but I think those could only remove content (like blurring faces), not add it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
I passed it based on the archive link, I don't think it's reasonable to think that the video was different at the time. --GRuban (talk) 14:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Go to Bing, select the little downward arrow next to the URL, click "cached". The Creative Commons license can be seen in the HTML, perhaps also directly on the page. Bing cache is volatile though, so I hope it doesn't disappear before you see it.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Pinging @Leoboudv, Yann, Leyo because Bing cache is volatile. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Your Bing cache links don't actually work for me - I get results, but no caches. Searching for the video titles works, though. cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?d=4899799351951713&w=PrNvRfYwppe0K4OvOafpILQ6vcyo7DRJ cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?d=4980128095151515&w=3XNgOUnvu0DYs2E6_PNKZ3e5A0P9Itky I can't make those links because of some filter against cc.bingj.com, apparently. --GRuban (talk) 18:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
I can see the CC license on Bing cache, but I would not validate this without more opinions. Could you ask on COM:VPC please? Regards, Yann (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
...whimper, whimper...   Do keep listing these, and I will get to them eventually, but … not all at once. --GRuban (talk) 20:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

I know many haven't been uploaded here (yet), but even for those it'll be good to confirm now the CC license is actually there while we can.

Suggestion (may vary a bit depending on browser): load the cached page, ctrl+u (view source), ctrl+f (search), type "Commons". Found anything? Creative Commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

  •   Comment: Hopefully some video clips were saved Alexis Jazz and GRuban. Unfortunately, I am very busy with work (in the real world) this Friday and Saturday. I'm glad that my suggestion saved some files. Unfortunately. I have to work again in my real job. PS: The video file you asked on my talkpage was passed Alexis Jazz . Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:16, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Sadly, most of the Internet archive links don't work. Also GRuban is right. The bing links don't work on my computer. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Working on it. I'll make a more usable list. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Leoboudv, GRuban: User:Alexis Jazz/DWDD archief#Unreviewed videos. Please try to deal with entries that need Bing cache first. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
OK, looks like all the Commons files listed in this talk page section have been reviewed, correct? Looking at the User:Alexis Jazz/DWDD archief#Unreviewed videos now. --GRuban (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
I found this wonderful tool that accesses Google cache: http://cachedview.com/ - useful to try when Bing cache is out. --GRuban (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

So I looked at a number of files on Alexis's list, and they all seemed to be done. Is the whole list done? --GRuban (talk) 23:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Christine Bottomley Out of Darkness.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Christine Bottomley Out of Darkness.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jack daniel brown 1979 (talk) 22:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Christine Bottomley Out of Darkness.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Christine Bottomley Out of Darkness.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jack brown 1979 (talk) 21:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Alexandra Johnes (14487510061) (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Alexandra Johnes (14487510061) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Mycena aciculata (A.H. Sm.) Desjardin & E. Horak 1006406.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear GRuban,

If you have some time, please review the single image above by me. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

  Done You're very welcome. --GRuban (talk) 20:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Rachael-Denhollander.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Rachael-Denhollander.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Patrick Rogel: - er - I'm sorry, but I don't remember adding an image of Rachael Denhollander. (I mean, I could be wrong, I upload a lot of images, I might have forgotten one, but they're usually linked from one of the pages in User:GRuban/Uploads, and I can't see one having been added there.) Can you check again whether I really added this one? --GRuban (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

3 images

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear GRuban,

If you have some time, please review these 3 images.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:49, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

  Done always a pleasure. The first one is downright beautiful (... possibly until you read the caption and realize what it is). --GRuban (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

2 images

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Dear GRuban,

Please review these 2 images if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Christine Bottomley receiving Best Actress at the BBC Audio Drama Awards 2017 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christine Bottomley receiving Best Actress at the BBC Audio Drama Awards 2017 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Christine Bottomley receiving Best Actress at the BBC Audio Drama Awards 2017 (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 19:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

@JuTa: actually, I cropped this from File:Christine Bottomley receiving Best Actress at the BBC Audio Drama Awards 2017.jpg, which you deleted, so this should be deleted at the same time (or be restored at the same time if that one ever is). Thanks! --GRuban (talk) 23:48, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2 minutes with Emily Ratajkowski (2).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:2 minutes with Emily Ratajkowski (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 09:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

2 images

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear GRuban,

Please review these 2 images when you can.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

  Done Mushrooms are clearly your specialty! --GRuban (talk) 04:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help on the review. My flickr account is 29471479@N07 and the link works. See this image I uploaded years ago from my own flickr account and then had someone clean up.
  • File:Early 20th Century Micronesian Armour.jpg

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:58, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Grace Hartzel for Love magazine, smiling.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Grace Hartzel for Love magazine, smiling.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bri (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

3 images

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Dear GRuban,

Please help review these images if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

  Done --GRuban (talk) 20:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Amie Wilkinson on Ergodicity in smooth dynamics in 2018.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Amie Wilkinson on Ergodicity in smooth dynamics in 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Woodroar (talk) 03:04, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg, Scott Thomson, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg, Scott Thomson, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Lanza, Don Harvey, and Greg at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Lanza, Don Harvey, and Greg at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:35, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg, Leah Ayres, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg, Leah Ayres, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg, Cara Buono, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg, Cara Buono, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg and Johnny Whitworth at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg and Johnny Whitworth at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Catherine Mary Stewart, Greg, and Lance Guest at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Catherine Mary Stewart, Greg, and Lance Guest at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Jennifer Runyon and Greg at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Jennifer Runyon and Greg at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg, Alexander Polinsky, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg, Alexander Polinsky, and Lanza at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Gary Lee Cavagnaro, Lanza, David Pollock, and Erin Blunt at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Gary Lee Cavagnaro, Lanza, David Pollock, and Erin Blunt at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Danielle von Zerneck, Greg, and Lou Diamond Phillips at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Danielle von Zerneck, Greg, and Lou Diamond Phillips at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg and Michael Des Barres at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg and Michael Des Barres at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg and Nicole Eggert at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg and Nicole Eggert at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Greg and Gabrielle Carteris at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Greg and Gabrielle Carteris at the Chiller Theatre Expo 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PaunchStevenson (talk) 07:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Bonnie Ross at E3 on Halo Canon.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Bonnie Ross at E3 on Halo Canon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

David Fuchs (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GRuban/Archive 3,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Re: File:Ashley Williams at Every Day premiere.jpg crop reversion?

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, and excuse my delay... 1st) imho, it's preferible a picture that follows the basic rules in the portrait's composition - with subject at the center of the imaginary lines that cut the format (example); and 2nd) for transparency's reasons, it's recommended to upload separally eventially cut-outs — danyele 17:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

  • @Danyele: Thanks for responding. I think (1) my crop keeps the subject at the center, and (2) I think it's not useful to keep an uncropped version that would never be used. As for history: I cropped 4 minutes after uploading the first, so I could as well have cropped first, and never uploaded the first version, no? But if you consider the uncropped superior, I will not object further. --GRuban (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Anna Kaiser for More for MBC.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anna Kaiser for More for MBC.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Missvain (talk) 04:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

@Missvain: this is an image from Vimeo. Please see COM:WHERE LICENSE. --GRuban (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Oops, sorry about that! I see now. Missvain (talk) 15:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Новогодний поезд.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago11 comments5 people in discussion

Скажите, пожалуйста, почему вы одобрили лицензионный статус этого файла: File:Новогодний поезд.jpg? --sasha (krassotkin) 21:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Это вторая картинка на http://transport.mos.ru/metro/news/#!/page/news/?id=19931 и https://www.mos.ru/legal/rules/ говорит "2.6. Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 при условии ссылки на первоисточник (в случае использования материалов сайта в сети Интернет – интерактивная ссылка)." --GRuban (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Вы приводите лицензионный договор с другого сайта. Они никак не связаны ни технически ни организационно. Просто многие организации, связанные с Москвой (не только учреждений, но и, например, некоторых музеев и т.п.) размещаются на доменах третьего уровня домена mos.ru. Но это совершенно разные и домены, и организации. Всё это нужно выносить на удаление. --sasha (krassotkin) 18:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
mos.ru (Официальный сайт Москвы) не связано с transport.mos.ru (Информационный ресурс Транспортного комплекса Москвы)? Сложно поверить. Но, конечно, все возможно с бюрократией. Можете ли вы найти другую страницу на transport.mos.ru, которая так говорит? Условия использования, авторские права и т. д.? Я искал и не мог найти такую. Eсть http://transport.mos.ru/help/ где есть форма, которую можно использовать для прямого запроса. Если вы это сделаете, и они подтвердят, что transport.mos.ru не является Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, как mos.ru, я вам поверю, и мы можем изменить или уточнить Template: mos.ru. (Я сам этого не сделаю, потому что я вырос в США, и, как вы, наверное, заметили, мой русский, хотя и технически родной, является языком 6-летнего ребенка!  ) До тех пор я думаю, что transport.mos.ru следует считать частью mos.ru, следуя Бритва Оккама, учитывая, что есть страница об авторском праве mos.ru и нет отдельной страницы об авторском праве на transport.mos.ru. --GRuban (talk) 19:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Я не думаю, а точно знаю, потому что косвенно к этому всему причастен. Перевода московских сайтов на свободную лицензию добивалась Викимедиа РУ в непосредственном с ними общении. К сожалению, большую часть независимых организаций и проектов перевести не удалось. К авторскому праву на Викискладе подходят не с Бритвой Оккама, а с Precautionary principle. См. также обсуждения w:ru:Википедия:Форум/Авторское право#*.mos.ru, из-за которого я к Вам и зашёл. Так что этот и подобные файлы совершенно точно нужно удалять. Приношу извинение за то, что обращаюсь по-русски, к сожалению мой английский гораздо хуже, чем у 6-летнего ребёнка, поэтому благодарен, что вы готовы вести переписку на русском языке. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Ничего, ничего, я читаю хорошо, я просто пишу с грамматическими ошибками, потому что хотя я говорю на языке, я никогда не ходил в первый класс русского языка. Эта дискуссия: (1), продолжается, и (2), если честно, половина участников говорят, что *.mos.ru так и является Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Если вы убедите их, это также сработает для меня. Давай сделаем так:
  1. Я подожду, пока обсуждение завершится (пожалуйста, скажите, если оно закончится, когда я не смотрю), и
  2. не буду помечать файлы foo.mos.ru до тех пор, пока это не произойдет, и
  3. когда обсуждение придет к какому-то выводу, я обновлю Template:Mos.ru/doc с заключением, и файлы соответственно.
ОК? --GRuban (talk) 16:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
@Yann: Bonjour! After a quick look at your Babel box, I'm guessing you can't read the above without Google Translate, but I gather you're the person that nominated these files for License review, so I should probably ping you. Here's the story: The site mos.ru (official site for city of Moscow, capital and largest city of Russia) releases its files under cc-by 4.0, (we've even got a Template:Mos.ru for that) so I reviewed a few files from transport.mos.ru (official site for Moscow public transport) under that license. User:Krassotkin brings up the reasonable argument that the mos.ru license doesn't actually extend to transport.mos.ru, that these are different sites and just share a common root. There is a discussion on the RU wikipedia about this that is ongoing and is currently about evenly divided each way. So I'm going to stop reviewing any more of these until that discussion concludes, then review in accordance with that conclusion, and also update Template:Mos.ru/doc. You're also an administrator, while I am merely a humble license reviewer, so if you disagree, feel free to tell me, and I'll probably do what you say, or at worst ask the Village Pump or something. --GRuban (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for pinging me. I let Russian decide if the license is valid or not. And it is precisely because non Russian speakers can't know about this that a license review is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Да, я тоже считаю, что все файлы с сайтов *.mos.ru, вне зависимости от прочих факторов, можно и нужно загружать под СС. Даже если для этого потребуется специальный консенсус сообщества вида "...признать свободными". Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 20:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Лицензия материалов на сторонних ресурсах является внешним по отношению к Википедии правовым вопросом и консенсусом участников Википедии регулироваться не может.--Yellow Horror (talk) 22:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

@Yann and Krassotkin: The RU discussion has stopped, I've modified Template:Mos.ru/doc and started Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with transport.mos.ru. Обсуждение на RU прекратилось, я изменил Template: Mos.ru/doc и начал Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with transport.mos.ru. --GRuban (talk) 16:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! Thanks for your many uploads. You've uploaded at least one photograph from Flickr. You might be interested in Flickr2Commons, a tool that automatically and faithfully transfers file metadata, source, author, etc, and performs a bot-assisted license review. Check it out! Cheers. --Animalparty (talk) 19:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I used the Upload Wizard, which I believe also does that, and may even invoke it. --GRuban (talk) 19:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GRuban/Archive 3,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hattie Caraway by Harris & Ewing, 1914.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hattie Caraway by Harris & Ewing, 1914.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Ohmdenosaurus license is now aviable (Like Emausaurus, but is nominated for Speedy deleting)

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Like the Emausaurus Restoration, this other needs confirmation for its creative commons 3.0. an older version was uploaded without it, now is solved. Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ohmdenosaurus_Reconstruction.jpg

User:Yewtharaptor 17:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

@Yewtharaptor: I'm sorry, but I don't know what you are referring to. Did you mean this message to go to someone else? --GRuban (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Maybe i stated it wrong...did you review this image(?): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emausaurus#/media/File:Emausaurus_Hagen_Theropod.jpg If so, there is another on the same situation of validating license: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ohmdenosaurus_Reconstruction.jpg

If you weren´t, wikipedia has made a mistake leading to your page.

User talk: Yewtharaptor 18:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Ah, I understand now. I'm afraid I review lots of images, so I don't remember all of them without a relevant link. I'm a Commons:License reviewer, but not one of the Commons:Administrators, so I can't undelete the file. You'll need to ask one of them, probably User:JGHowes to do that ... and I see you already have, at User_talk:JGHowes#Ohmdenosaurus_license_was_aviable...and_was_deleted_without_any_review. The best I can do is to weigh in at that discussion, so I shall. --GRuban (talk) 19:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi about the cropped pic

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

GRuban, You nominated a pic that I'd cropped to a powerpoint pic. OK. I can see that the letter of the rule might prevent this. Sad. You also note here that it could be cropped in a different way. BUT that file is deleted, too?? Surely it is possible to take a pic of someone giving a presentation??? If not then we have 1000s of images to delete too. Care to comment? Thanks Victuallers (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

You can take a picture of a person giving a presentation, and have the copyright to the picture of the person. You don't own the copyright to the picture of the presentation on the screen, that is owned by the creator of the presentation. (Otherwise you might as well take a video camera into a movie theater airing Rise of Skywalker, point it at the screen, and claim the copyright to that.) --GRuban (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Here are some examples from images I uploaded within the last few months. --GRuban (talk) 21:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  •  
    Natalie Frank Presumably the presentation behind her is one of her works, but the photographer (videographer) doesn't gain the rights to it, only to the picture of her. The bit of painting is de minimis as the focus is clearly on her. If it were the other way around, if it were mostly a shot of her painting, we couldn't have that without Frank's specific release.
  •  
    Haiyan Zhang Similarly, the rights to the picture of the person don't extend to the rights to the presentation behind her. We couldn't have an image focusing on the presentation.
  •  
    Ruth Sanderson, holding one of her drawings. The photographer (me! I actually photographed this one!) doesn't own the rights to the drawing, but does own the rights to the picture of the person. I couldn't have just photographed her drawing and uploaded it; and I can't recrop the image to just the drawing.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GRuban/Archive_3&oldid=424001042"
Return to the user page of "GRuban/Archive 3".