Tylwyth Eldar

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tylwyth Eldar!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Graffiti et Street Art - Poisson.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

OK. Thank you. --Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 22:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Bonjour, j'ai trouvé quelques erreurs à corriger à un article mais je viens de remarquer qu'il faut un compte pour éditer sur certains articles.

Pour cette article, pour le président dans l'infobox à la ligne direction, ce doit être à la place 1986 (Jack Stupp 1957-1986 et Michael Haberman 1986-1996), c'est l'année de changement de président.

Et voici un paragraphe avec une source à ajouter en ordre chronologique à la section Histoire, il suffit de recopier le texte source dans cette page de discussion dont voici:

Le {{date|7|février|1986}}, Jack Stupp démissionne de son poste de [[Directeur général|président-directeur général]], et est remplacé par le [[vice-président]] Michael Haberman<ref name="aggressive"/>.

Là le résultat n'est pas bon mais il sera correct à l'article.

Et toujours à la section Histoire à la phrase: En août 1996.., il faudrait changer la fin de la phrase: pour 70 millions de dollars, par: pour environ 75 millions de dollars. C'est ce qui est indiqué dans la référence.

Merci encore si vous pouvez apporter ces corrections mineures!--2605:B100:51C:A959:E87F:4487:B2C2:8828 06:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour. Vous pouvez essayer ceci : Wikipédia:N'hésitez pas !. Cordialement. --Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 07:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

FYI: Category:Sockpuppets of ConsumersDistributingonline --Achim (talk) 11:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Musée des miniatures et du cinéma 1.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Stèle funéraire attique edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Salut !

Je ne sais pas si tu as vu, j'ai raconté l'histoire de la stèle ici https://twitter.com/photos_floues/status/1265534697284743168 Ça m'avait fait ma journée.

Merci encore pour tes contributions et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 18:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour @Rama: Merci pour le retour. C'est toujours sympa de voir que les photos sont utilisées. Bonne continuation à toi aussi --Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Machairodus giganteus 01.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Tylwyth Eldar, I'm sorry to contradict you, but Machairodus is a felid (Felidae), a mammal (Mammalia), not a dinosaur (Dinosauria). Therefore the name and category of the photo are wrong. All the best, PePeEfe (talk) 09:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I just realized that Dinosauria is the name of a museum. However, you will understand that the name of the photo was misleading. . All the best, --PePeEfe (talk) 09:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dear @PePeEfe: indeed the name of file, Dinosauria, resend to museum. I understand the problem of confusion and I’m OK for the rename. I named a lot of files with Dinosauria : fossils of mammals, flora, bugs… (for the museum). But, please, do not empty the category : Category:Dinosauria (museum)

. Thank you, Cordially --Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, now that I am clear that Dinosauria is a museum, I will not remove the category again, sorry for the inconvenience. It may be wise to rename the remain non-dinosaur files, they may be misleading to other editors. A cordial greeting, --PePeEfe (talk) 17:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Millions of cats edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

(namely, file:Wanda Gag-Millions of Cats.jpg) -- is it in the public domain in the US? I would have thought that the Public Domain Day for a 1928 publication would be January 1, 2024. Arlo James Barnes 18:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Arlo. For the US, it is not in the public domain. There's one year to wait. This only concerns countries applying the rule: 75 years after death. I uploaded for Wiki-Fr which applies: 70 years after death. Cordially --Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see. FRwiki doesn't have local upload enabled, so it is obliged to use Commons as a file repository. Commons' servers are hosted in the US, so works must be PD in the US and in the country of original publication (in this case, also the US). Anyway, I look forwarding to uploading the complete book in less than a year. Arlo James Barnes 08:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Basilique - Intérieur 02.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Marbres et "marbres" edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour Tylwyth Eldar !

j'ai été très heureux de voir les nombreuses photos de matériaux de Bagnères-de-Bigorre - Musée du marbre. Comme je m'y connais un peu en roches, j'ai commencé à modifier certaines catégories. La catégorie principale "Marbre" est effectivement créée selon la définition géologique. Cependant, de nombreux exemples de l'impressionnant Musée du marbre ne sont pas des marbres, mais des calcaires colorés, des bréchiques, des onyx calcaires, des travertins ou des conglomérats. Il en résulte des contradictions au sein de la catégorie principale. Traditionnellement, les tailleurs de pierre et les entreprises de la pierre désignent de nombreuses roches polissables comme étant du marbre. Pour le profane, cela prête malheureusement à confusion. Je vais essayer de réorganiser un peu les choses et, si nécessaire, j'ajouterais des informations à certains libellés de fichiers. Merci pour les belles images ! Lysippos (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour @Lysippos: , merci beaucoup pour votre intérêt sur le sujet. Pour ma part, je n'y connaît pas grand chose, mis à part que la diversité des couleurs et des formes est fascinante. J'ai encore des photos à charger mais en chargeant les premières, j'ai trouvé que la thématique manquait de catégories sur commons, que ce soit sur l'origine des roches, les carrières et bien sûr les différents types de "marbre". Merci de vous attaquer au sujet. J'ai aussi charger d'autres photos de marbre dans la catégorie Écomusée Marbre et Terroir de Caunes-Minervois. Ce musée est plus jeune et la collection moins diversifiée mais il y a quelques échantillons. Cordialement, --Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bon soir Tylwyth Eldar. C'est une bonne idée de classer les images par groupes de couleurs. Le seul problème, c'est que beaucoup de ces roches ne sont pas vraiment des marbres. C'est pourquoi j'ai fait une proposition ici : Category talk:Marble by color. "Pierres décoratives" est un terme générique. Tout utilisateur peut s'en servir sans connaissances spéciales en géologie. Cela facilite les choses et il n'est pas nécessaire de changer grand-chose. J'ai hâte de voir les photos de l'Écomusée Marbre et Terroir de Caunes-Minervois. Les roches décoratives de la Montagne Noire sont très couleur intense.

Une grande partie des objets du musée de Bagnères-de-Bigorre est illustrée dans ce livre: https://www.laverdure.fr/livres/1429-livre-identification-des-marbres.html Les illustrations en couleur sont excellentes. Jacques Dubarry de Lassale a réalisé une grande performance avec sa collection.

Cordialement Lysippos (talk) 21:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Fresque des Lyonnais 1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fresque des Lyonnais 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fresque des Lyonnais 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 12:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Fresque des Lyonnais 2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fresque des Lyonnais 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fresque des Lyonnais 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 12:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Fresque des Lyonnais 3.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fresque des Lyonnais 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fresque des Lyonnais 3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 12:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Fresque des Lyonnais 4.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fresque des Lyonnais 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fresque des Lyonnais 4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 12:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Fresque des Lyonnais 5.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fresque des Lyonnais 5.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fresque des Lyonnais 5.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Benoît (d) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic