WTCA
For the past talk see: User talk:WTCA/archive
_1951.jpg){kind=link}
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- oops silly typo. corrected. WTCA 14:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Hiranuma_cabibet_photo_op.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 05:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Kusaya no himono.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
-- 202.177.115.128 14:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- oops sorry that was a simple confusion. please go ahead and delete it. WTCA 06:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Genji_Matsuda_and_Yoshio_Kodama_en_route_to_Hayama_1935.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Gozen-kaiji_14_August_1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Renaming pictures edit
Hi WTCA. If you wish to rename a picture, please use {{Bad name}}. Commons:Deletion requests is a different and lengthy procedure which is not needed here. Just add :
{{bad name|name of the correct picture}}
on the badly named picture. It will then be speedy-deleted by an administrator. Please don't blank badly named picture: administrator need to check whether it is an exact duplicate or not.
Regarding Image:Gozen-kaiji_14_August_1945.jpg and Image:Genji_Matsuda_and_Yoshio_Kodama_en_route_to_Hayama_1935.jpg, can you point to me which are the replacements? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh thank you. That is convenient :-)
- The replacements are:
Image:Gozen-kaigi_14_August_1945.jpg and
Image:Genji_Matsuda_and_Hideo_Kodama_en_route_to_Hayama_1935.jpg
- Thanks so much! WTCA 12:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Blofeld_in_For_Your_Eyes_Only.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Blofeld_in_From_Russia_with_Love.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Blofeld_in_Never_Say_Never_Again.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Blofeld_in_On_Her_Majesty's_Secret_Service.jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Blofeld_in_Thunderball.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Blofeld_in_You_Only_Live_Twice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Blofeld_in_Diamonds_Are_Forever.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Koshaku edit
hello there and thank you for your message. Well AFAIK Prime Minister Konoe was known with the title of "prince" in the English language, not "duke", see [1] and [2]. Although with koshaku arguably "duke" was also used, however this is not the case in the context of Konoe. And good thing you pointed out the other koshaku prime ministers, the categories should be renamed in that case as well since titles are used. Gryffindor 18:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
No no, you misread what I said. Fumimaro Konoe should be "Fumimaro Knoe," not "Prince Fumimaro Konoe" nor "Duke Konoe" as per Wiki style (no title such as Sir, Dame, Baron, Viscount, Count, Earl, Marquis, Duke, Prince, etc.). WTCA 18:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- The Commons do not follow naming schemes or conventions from any Wikipedia and is independent from that. The only policy that exists is that categories should be in English, articles in native language, see Commons:Language policy. Gryffindor 18:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Indeed categories should be in English. So what is your justification for naming commons category different from the English article ( en:Fumimaro Konoe)? WTCA 19:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I just named the reason in my previous message, categories do not follow the scheme in the English Wikipedia or any other for that matter. If he had a title, then it should be used. Gryffindor 19:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Are you suggesting that all the aristocratic titles should be included in category names? Or you would rather make inconsistency by making Konoe an exception? WTCA 19:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I orientated myself after the category Category:Prime ministers of the United Kingdom. Even dukes, earls, marquess and lords are shown, included with their title. So why should Japanese nobles be treated differently? We should be consistent, so I think adding titles is the best solution. Gryffindor 19:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
a) Do you have any idea how many categories you have to rename if you are to include all the aristocratic titles in category names? And how are you going to assure that there will be no confusion or inconsistency as a result of doing so?
b) Why the Japanese have to follow the English? We're not talking about the language here, it's the system and tradition. If you think what the British does is the way for others to follow, then I must say I'm very disappointed by your rather arrogant rationale.
WTCA 19:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Woah, where is this coming from, "arrogant rationale"? No need to use such language, ok? I happen to know Japanese culture very well, and I know for a fact that not using titles is highly disrespectful. Since we can't use the Japanese version of the titles, we should use the English version. I am not proposing to rename all the kuge and what not with their japanese titles. Besides, what other cases are you referring to? Again, Commons does not follow any Wiki convention. Gryffindor 19:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
No, nothing is coming from nowhere. My point is just this: leave out what the British does. We are talking about the Japanese here.
And I'm sorry, but I happen to be a Japanese for over four decades and I know about my culture very well myself. And I happen to have been born in a family which used to have one of those aristocratic titles (this is true). It is, on the contrary to your belief, not disrespectful at all to omit such titles in the post-war Japan; it is rather weird and unusual if you don't.
Speaking of being disrespectful, mixing up HIH Prince (王/親王) and Prince (公爵) is actually considered more disrespectful to the royals.
I understand Commons may not follow any Wiki convention. But that doesn't mean you can come up with your own convention for Commons and push it knowing that it would result in creating huge inconsistency and chaos.
Chaos indeed: if you start adding Prince (公爵), then you'll have to add Marquise (侯爵), Count (伯爵), Viscount (子爵) and Baron (男爵) as well. Can you be responsible for that? And who's going to follow that?
Again, as far as the Japanese is concerned, titles should be reserved for the royals only (namely, Emperor, Empress, HIH Prince and HIH Princess), just as most books and publications, both in Japanese and English, does.
WTCA 20:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see where the problem lies. Titles were used back then, I am not talking about today so please don't mix up the issues. And besides, Prince Konoe was indeed related to the imperial family, therefore you are contradicting yourself. And yes, if there were other nobles with Meiji titles such as baron, viscount, etc. what is wrong with using them when all the other noble categories (regardless if they be Chinese, Japanese, British, ...etc.) use them? The point is to be consistent. Either eliminate all titles in the naming, or have them. Gryffindor 17:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
My point exactly. Hence I eliminated "Prince" from Fumimaro Konoe, the only non-HIH to be tied with the title. WTCA 18:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:1869USG.JPG edit
Hi. I saw you removed "Category:Thomas Jefferson" from Image:1869USG.JPG. Please note the depiction of Jefferson on the left of the image, an essential part of the point of the cartoon. I have therefore put the category back on the image. If you disagree, please explain or discuss, thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 02:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Infrogmation, I understand what you are saying, but please note that Wikimedia Commons is not as the same as Wikipedia. If it's Wikipedia, any descriptions of the cartoon may be related to both Grant's and Jefferson's articles. But in Commons, the image of it is intended to make fun of nothing but Grant's inauguration procession.
- If you see it this way --> Category:Thomas_Jefferson <-- I believe you see what I see: it clearly does not belong there. Thanks, WTCA 02:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Hm, the way I see it, categories are to help users find things relevent to topics. I'd say that image is relevent to Thomas Jefferson, both in actually showing a depiction of him and as an illustration of how Jefferson was percieved at the time. Do you have other suggestions for helping identify this? Some categories about individuals are subcategorized, eg, "Caricatures of so-and-so", "Paintings of so-and-so", etc. Sometimes the most important images are displayed on a page, with additional images availible in the category for the topic. Other thoughts? Thanks, -- Infrogmation 04:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Moving categories edit
Hello again. I note that you moved the contents of Category:James S. Sherman to Category:James Sherman. I have no particular opinion as to which name is better. However, when moving material please note that things may link to where you are moving them from. Note that the en:Wikipedia article on the person, en:James S. Sherman, links to the old category title, and now the link goes to a blank page. If you think something needs to be renamed, you may wish to check usage and correct links to it. Rather than blanking formerly used categories, you may wish to use the Template:Category redirect. Hope this helps, cheers, -- Infrogmation 05:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Categorizing images edit
I will start doing that. Sorry! Best, Happyme22 23:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:White_House_Area_Japanese.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:24 Eyes 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:24 Eyes 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
new template edit
Hello WTCA! Could you, please, verify this new template? {{PD-Japan-organization}}
I am sorry for deletion request for Image:24 Eyes 1.jpg and for Image:24 Eyes 2.jpg. I was not carefully reading, that it is a still image. Can I remove the delete template from those two images? Thank you for your cooperation. --Snek01 01:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Snek01, thank you for the note. Yes, I'll appreciate if you could please remove the deletion request for the 24 eyes. As for the new template, give me a day and I'll verify it. Thanks again. WTCA 19:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Carmen dancing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 10:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Solitaire_by_Jane_Seymour.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Osaka_Station_-_third_depot_-_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Osaka_Station_-_third_depot_-_1_cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Tesuro Tamba as Ishitani in Gero no Kubi 1955.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
| Image deletion warning | Image:Tesuro Tamba as Ishitani in Gero no Kubi 1955 cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
| Pay attention to copyright | File:Lou Henry Hoover.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Tip: Categorizing images edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Image:James Brady.jpg is uncategorized since 30 April 2009.
- Image:Larry Speakes.jpg is uncategorized since 30 April 2009.
Copyright status: File:Nobusuke_Kishi_1956.jpg edit
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Nobusuke_Kishi_1956.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
|
File:Atlantis Docked to Mir cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Nobusuke_Kishi_1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Setsuko Hara smiling.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Setsuko Hara and Ken Uehara in The Sound of the Mountain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Tokyo Story.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Maria_Shriver_California_first_lady.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A file has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Akira Kouchiyama 
18:53, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion edit
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:MichioKaku commons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
 |
File:MichioKaku commons.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 19:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:14 John Breckinridge 3x4.jpg edit
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:14 John Breckinridge 3x4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:14 John Breckinridge 3x4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Notification about possible deletion edit
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Powers (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kaoru Hatoyama.jpg edit
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kaoru Hatoyama.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Akira Kurosawa.jpg edit
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Akira Kurosawa.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Akira Kurosawa.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
|
|
File:Carmen Kokyo-ni Kaeru poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Alex Nitta and Pika.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Kiyokata Kaburaki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Kiyokata Kaburaki cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 08:54, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:Taikan Yokoyama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Taikan Yokoyama cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Ranpo Edogawa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Ranpo Edogawa cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Hibari Misora.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
Family crest of Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Ruth1920 commons.jpg edit
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ruth1920 commons.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Ruth1920 commons.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
|
|
File:Ruth1920 commons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
_1951.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1951.jpg){kind=link}
|
|
File:The Idiot (Hakuchi) 1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
_1951.jpg){kind=link}
_1951.jpg){kind=link}
File source is not properly indicated: File:Giant panda range.svg edit
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Giant panda range.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Giant panda range.svg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
|
|
File:Alice Mabel Bacon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Inoshiro Honda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Other symbols related to family crest of Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
|
|
File:MoonrakersMural commons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
