User talk:WhiteWriter/Archive 1

English: Welcome to the Commons, Tadija!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Patrícia ^msg 15:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 6292a8a256b957728a5a55732adac457

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Osterstein Castle from the air, 2008.jpg

The entire problem is the fact that we don't know if the photographer has given permission. If that can be resolved, we'll be happy to keep the image, since it's quite a good picture and is surely quite useful. Please ask the photographer to email his permission to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org", and please be careful to remind the photographer that the only way we'll accept it is if he releases it into the public domain or if he allows its use under a free license as defined by Commons:Licensing. If you contact the photographer and he allows its use this way, I can't imagine why anyone would want it to be deleted. Nyttend (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

In other words, the photographer sent an email to that address saying that he releases it into the public domain? Or do you mean that the uploader sent you this email? If you were sent the email, simply forward it to the address I gave you, and please put "File:Osterstein Castle from the air, 2008.jpg" as the subject line. I'm going to tag the image with {{OTRS pending}}. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

You recent edits

Some of your recent edits appear to be unhelpful. In particular, removing descriptions in other languages and blanking categories. You are welcome to comment here where this issue was raised. Adambro (talk) 11:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Uaz kosovo.jpg

Hello, I have removed speedy deletion tag from this image. This file was uploads to english wikipedia almost a year before it appeared on the blog you linked, besides resolution if lower. --Justass (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

--Justass (talk) 19:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

False accusations. --Tadija (talk)

File:Osterstein Castle from the air, 2008.jpg

The entire problem is the fact that we don't know if the photographer has given permission. If that can be resolved, we'll be happy to keep the image, since it's quite a good picture and is surely quite useful. Please ask the photographer to email his permission to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org", and please be careful to remind the photographer that the only way we'll accept it is if he releases it into the public domain or if he allows its use under a free license as defined by Commons:Licensing. If you contact the photographer and he allows its use this way, I can't imagine why anyone would want it to be deleted. Nyttend (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

In other words, the photographer sent an email to that address saying that he releases it into the public domain? Or do you mean that the uploader sent you this email? If you were sent the email, simply forward it to the address I gave you, and please put "File:Osterstein Castle from the air, 2008.jpg" as the subject line. I'm going to tag the image with {{OTRS pending}}. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Serbian_head.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Serbian_head.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Serbian_head.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 22:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Star_Lite_Motel.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Star_Lite_Motel.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Star_Lite_Motel.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Star_Lite_Motel.jpg

File:Star_Lite_Motel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Justass (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Serbian_head.jpg

File:Serbian_head.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token ab09daf3fc6b44280e53c95a9287c9f6

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, WhiteWriter!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Tadija.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Sremska Mitrovica Museum.jpg

File:Sremska Mitrovica Museum.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Geagea (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Sirmium tomb.jpg

File:Sirmium tomb.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Geagea (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Ancient Roman Sirmium.jpg

File:Ancient Roman Sirmium.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Geagea (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Sirmium.jpg

File:Sirmium.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Geagea (talk) 23:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Brankovina.JPG

File:Brankovina.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Geagea (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Beli dvor.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Beli dvor.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Geagea (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Zvečan.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zvečan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zvečan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

You uploaded photo over other photo. Please uploaded it in a different file. That is ok to have 2 photos of the same place. Geagea (talk) 01:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: screenshot

Well, IMHO this is copyrighted screenshot from a game (and as far as I remember you can only upload free-licensed material on Commons). Unless, of course game producer allowed to post pictures on GPL or Creative Commons license. Thanks ! Sir Lothar (talk) 12:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, the category you gave as example mostly contains GPL and w:Open Source games (like for example File:Wesnoth-157.png), so screenshots are legal here. Entropia Universe is copyrighted by MindArk company. In my opinion, you should ask game producer for permission if he allows to post screenshots on some free licenses~. Sir Lothar (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ancient Roman Sirmium.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ancient Roman Sirmium.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ancient Roman Sirmium.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Captain-tucker (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Brankovina.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brankovina.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brankovina.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Captain-tucker (talk) 17:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sirmium tomb.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sirmium tomb.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sirmium tomb.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Captain-tucker (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sirmium.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sirmium.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Captain-tucker (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sremska Mitrovica Museum.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sremska Mitrovica Museum.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sremska Mitrovica Museum.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Captain-tucker (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Entropia Universe.jpg

File:Entropia Universe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings

---

Hello. This is a reminder for you that it is important to address the identified issues instead of simply removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions according to our community guidelines. You can have this done automatically for you -- simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

Geagea (talk) 19:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Šajkača.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Šajkača.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Šajkača.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Geagea (talk) 19:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kapetanovo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kapetanovo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Geagea (talk) 20:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rajačke pivnice.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rajačke pivnice.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rajačke pivnice.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Geagea (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Devič.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Devič.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Devič.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Geagea (talk) 21:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:View on Monastery Banjska.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:View on Monastery Banjska.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Geagea (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mušutište.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mušutište.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Geagea (talk) 21:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Scope Change for Murgjo Sharr Mountain Dog Nedi Limani

"A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". see please reconsider your vote, Commons:Valued image candidates/Murgjo Sharr Mountain Dog Nedi Limani.jpg I have changed the scope to show the type of dog with a herd. Have a nice day, Mdupont (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Spomenik_na_Grmeču.jpg

File:Spomenik_na_Grmeču.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 08:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Visoki Dečani Katholikon (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

 Comment I think that the photo represents very good the monastic church but not the whole monastery. So, the scope name should emphasize the church. I suggest scope names such as: Visoki Dečani Monastic Church (exterior) or Visoki Dečani Katholikon (exterior).--MrPanyGoff 17:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

 Done --WhiteWriter ^speaks 23:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

 Support --MrPanyGoff 06:15, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Map Serbia Blank .png

As you can see on the page under section: Usage of file, there is list of files on all wikies, where this file is used. You can use file wherever you want, under this name. The most usage is on bs.wiki and hr.wiki. There is properly used in articles about town in Serbia. From 17 of February 2008, Kosovo IS NOT a part of Serbia, and Serbia cannot be depicted under name (without Kosovo). Same thing as naming Bosnia and Herzegovina without Sandžak, as Sandžak is not part of BiH. You're just vandalising --CERminator (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

No matter who thinks this or that, we have to respect the facts. In constitution of Serbia it is mentioned that Kosovo is integral part of land, proclamation of Kosovo has been accepted from over 70 or even more countries of the World. That is fact. Your opinion or even mine, cannot return the Kosovo. Kosovo remains country outside the Serbia. I'm so sorry of that, but you as Serbian, I understand your anger of that.--CERminator (talk) 13:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes, all views must be presented in Wikipedia. So, POV from many, many users, international organizations, even UN, EU, NATO, etc. etc. must be presented, as Kosovo is not within Serbia anymore. Maybe until February 2008, but now this is fact. No matter who you are, or who am I, in constitution of Serbia could be even Republika Srpska or Knin is integral part of Serbia, but try to mention it in real world? --CERminator (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

No, we don't present our view, but the real fact. Knin what I mentioned is just for compare. Just try to make map with title: Map of Serbia (without Knin, Republika Srpska and other integral parts of Serbia), and you'll see what is it looks like. Funny, isn't is? Now for real: what is purpose of map without something? Should Russians going to make a map Map of Russia (without Alaska) since Alaska was Russian before they sell it to USA? That make no sense. What you trying to present is just historic overview of situation before Kosovo's independence proclamation. Why you doesn't delete all articles on en.wikipedia about cities in Kosovo, since they doesn't exist as independent country? They are recognized, fullstop. EOD--CERminator (talk) 07:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

That POV is only valid for Serbia. For many other countries this is not the case. I agree that Serbia still recognize Kosovo as part of its territory, but for the rest of the world, Kosovo is de facto independent state. SRJ (Serbia and Montenegro) officially recognized Bosnia after the war, but Bosnia is from 1992 de facto outside the SRJ. There are many examples around the world, but you see only POV from Serbia.--CERminator (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Already answered. What about more than 70 crucial countries including USA, Germany, etc and many international organisations as NATO, EU, WHO...--CERminator (talk) 07:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Again: That POV is only valid for Serbia. This discussion doesn't lead to anything. As I already said, there are only one fact: Serbia doesn't recognize Kosovo and many countries (it doesn't matter who) recognize it. It cannot be different as this.--CERminator (talk) 06:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

rename request

Can you please rename these two maps:

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Western_Outlands.png
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Western_Outlands_map.png

This is POV and inaccurate title – one cannot claim that part of another country is his „outland“. Even in Bulgarian Wkkipedia this is named „western provinces“ and not „outlands“: http://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/Западни_покрайнини Name „outlands“ is invented and used only in wikipedia and nowhere else. I corrected file descriptions to more accurate ones, but I am not able to rename these files. Proper names of these files should be „Territories ceded by Bulgaria to SCS Kingdom“ and „Territories ceded by Bulgaria to SCS Kingdom map“ 123iti (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Problem is that I already created rename template there, but my preoposal was rejected with explanation „no valid reason stated“. See for yourself: [1] I see that you are able to move file names, so I posted my personal rename request on your user talk, but if you cant do it without rename template then forget it (I am not going to create that template again to be again rejected by user AleXXw). Anyway, how can I have file renaming option? Do I need to have many edits or to be more active in commons for that option? 123iti (talk) 20:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Direktor

There is one more map that Direktor uploaded in which name of Serbia is changed: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Axis_occupation_of_Yugoslavia_1941-43_legend.png Perhaps you can adjust that one too. PANONIAN (talk) 09:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I didn't saw that one. But it is unused anyway. But, Fixed. Thanks. :) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 17:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Axis_occupation_of_Yugoslavia_1941-43.png

File:Axis_occupation_of_Yugoslavia_1941-43.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PANONIAN (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Axis_occupation_of_Yugoslavia_1943-44.png

File:Axis_occupation_of_Yugoslavia_1943-44.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PANONIAN (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Axis occupation of Yugoslavia 1941-43.png. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--  Docu  at 03:17, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Desio tram 2.jpg rename

You cancelled the rename. I dont see any reason for it. It satisfies guideline nr 3; correct misleading names into accurate ones. Besides another file is already renamed (Desio tram 2.jpg)

I originaly though it was the Desio tramline and gave a wrong filename but I was mistaken and the text en categorys where corrected. Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Justiniana Prima overview.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support geocoded, nice pic, etc. --Simone 15:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi WhiteWriter !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. Bencmq (talk) 02:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genex Tower, looking up..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good close up view --Taxiarchos228 20:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genex Tower, overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genex Tower, looking up, between two towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 18:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Perspective correction

It all depends on your software post-processing. Photoshop does it very well but there are free software. It's not very complicated, but essential for QI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

• I took the liberty to load a new version of your image: Monastir Studenica I. JPG. Perspective is corrected, I changed the light and dark tones. You can remove it if it does not please you ... Good Evening ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monsatir Studenica III.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Vassil 11:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons delinker for File:Etrave du NCSM Onondaga a Pointe-au-Pere en 2008.jpg

I've done the move myself as they were only one page that used it in french. The redirection page is of no use now, must i make a demand to suppress it. Thanks. ChristianT (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, no, dont worry, i will clear it. All best, happy new year! -WhiteWriter ^speaks 21:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. i have also see that you just put : before the world file. So, « Bonne année » you to. -- ChristianT (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petrova crkva, Ras.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tiled! --Archaeodontosaurus 09:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)I uploaded an edit. --Vassil 10:55, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Better, merci. Good enough for QI--Jebulon 09:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Stari_bigz.jpg

File:Stari_bigz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Risovača,_porodica_pračoveka.jpg

File:Risovača,_porodica_pračoveka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nis kolaz sa rubovima.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nis kolaz sa rubovima.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Nis kolaz sa rubovima.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Biciklom do Hilandara.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Biciklom do Hilandara.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Biciklom do Hilandara.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Vidovdanski_hram.jpg

File:Vidovdanski_hram.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Biciklom do Hilandara.jpg

File:Biciklom do Hilandara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Karađorđević.gif

File:Karađorđević.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petrova crkva-ploca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some cropping at the right side and perhaps also a slight perspective correction, but otherwise very good quality. Deserves promotion already. -- MJJR 22:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Vered

Hi. I think it's funny. If Vered.JPG is too little for a filename how would you allow or explain File:Vered.jpg. I was requesting it to be Vered simply since this is her name... :-) See if you can reconsider your choice, it's trusted by me. Cheerz, Orrlingtalk 15:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Žiča Monastery tower rose window. Near Kraljevo, Serbia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}