Commons:Кандидаты в избранные изображения

Кандидаты в избранные изображения на других языках:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Если вы считаете, что нашли или создали изображение, достойное стать избранным,— пожалуйста, добавьте его в нижеследующий раздел Кандидаты. Если в течение 15 дней ваше предложение будет принято собществом, то изображению будет присвоено звание избранного. Пожалуйста, обратите внимание: избранные изображения не имеют прямого отношения к Изображениям дня (однако выбор изображений дня производится преимущественно из «избранных изображений»).

КандидатыEdit

Для того чтобы проголосовать или добавить новое изображение-кандидат, перейдите по этой ссылке

Featured picture candidatesEdit

File:АР Кимжа.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 05:00:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 panorama 2.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2020 at 01:45:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Srinagar12.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 23:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
  •   Info All by me. -- KennyOMG (talk) 23:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- KennyOMG (talk) 23:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Lovely crepuscular rays. This looks great at fullscreen but the bottom part looks like a nondescript black blob at thumbnail size. When you have a backlit situation, you can either go for detail or go for a silhouette; I think the former is better here. So I recommend raising the shadows (as well as the contrast to prevent the washed-out HDR look). You may also want to review your sharpening (especially masking) and noise reduction options because it's a little noisy. I've taken the liberty to change the FP category to "Settlements", as "Natural" usually refers to all-natural landscapes (with perhaps only a tiny portion manmade); feel free to revert or change it to something better. I've also changed the format to "panorama", which is the best choice for aspect ratios from 2:1 to 4:1. -- King of ♥ 23:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful. The shadows are a bit noisy but IMO not too much of a problem, that isn't what this photo is about. Cmao20 (talk) 00:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Mero (Epinephelus marginatus), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 24.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 21:07:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)
  •   Info Exemplar of an adult dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus) of about 150 centimetres (59 in) length and 60 kilograms (130 lb) heavy seen at a depth of about 25 metres (82 ft), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment It is great with all these info details about the photo, but they should be written on the image file page instead (or both) so that anyone can find them easily. This page will be archived to an obscure corner of Commons after nine days where only photo-nerds will see it. Please. --Cart (talk) 21:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I actually think this one is slightly better than your other underwater nomination - the subject stands out better from the background. Quality is very good. Also Cart, I've copied the info to the file page. Cmao20 (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank for fixing the description Cmao20, although I think that should be a job for the author/nominator, especially when that author is such an extremely experienced Commoner. --Cart (talk) 00:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Almeja gigante (Tridacna gigas), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 32.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 18:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Bivalvia
  •   Info Exemplar of Giant clam (Tridacna gigas), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice pic. In terms of the image quality, I guess the thing to do is compare this with the other images on Commons in Category:Tridacna gigas. Most seem to be specimens photographed in museums etc.; there are a handful of acquarium shots, some of which are quite good, but most have a lot of CA and other technical flaws. By comparison, this is a proper underwater shot and reasonably sharp where it counts. Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I would prefer to see a bit more contrast and microcontrast (clarity). -- King of ♥ 20:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
    KoH are you sugggesting me to adjust the settings in terms of contrast or do you mean that you'd like to see an photo with more colors/contrast (so, adjusting the settings has no purpose here)? --Poco a poco (talk) 10:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sorry, this bivalve does not look like a Tridacna gigas. Tridacna gigas is distributed in the Indo-Pacific region, it does not occur in the Atlantic (and consequently also not in Madeira). --Llez (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
    Llez: to be honest, I wasn't sure about the id but have searched for hours within Madeira or Atlantic Ocean clams/molluscs and haven't found anything else that could match better than Tridacna gigas. You're probably one of our experts in this area, do you have a clue or bibliography that could help me? On the Internet I have found nothing about big clams in this area --Poco a poco (talk) 10:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I'm glad folks finally realize how hard it is to get underwater photos that are technically great. This is a really nice quality, and there is nothing wrong with the camera settings. However, I would prefer some better consideration regarding composition for an FP. It is harder than on land, but even so. I don't expect anyone to get it right on their first attempts (it took me some three years to get good shots into the water), but some wow-factor would be nice. IMO; you got it with the purple sea urchin, not so much with this or the green starfish. Just keep at it, it will get better. :-) --Cart (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
    Cart you don't have to tell me how hard it's to get nice picture underwater, now I feel more comfortable about reviewing them after gathering some experience. This is even more tricky than 5x-10x macro shots :) I thought though that your marine pictures were taken from above the sea. If not, what equipment are you using to get under the water? --Poco a poco (talk) 10:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Mizrah - Israel Dov Rosenbaum.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 10:59:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Seedeater (Sporophila sp.) female.JPGEdit

Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2020 at 09:54:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Edouard Manet - Olympia - Google Art ProjectFXD.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 22:16:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Comment I realize this would be a typo, but Monet and Manet are very different painters. (Monet is one of my favorites, as Debussy is one of my favorite composers, but I find that Manet's paintings only occasionally have fully realized forms [for example, the Philadelphia Museum of Art has a couple of big Manets that I liked the last time I saw them]. I'm quite aware that my views on this are uncommon.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
I think auto type did this to me hahaha. Thanks Ikan for brining it to my attention. --Gnosis (talk) 01:56, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose like Cmao20, I would like to see a better quality digitization of this painting be featured. Buidhe (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Big Sandy Bay beach.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 18:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Georges Rochegrosse - Henry Février - Henri Cain and Louis Payen after Victorien Sardou - Gismonda.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 17:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Catalan boats - Sète.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 16:17:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Ceiling of a shabestan in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran, 2.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2020 at 12:44:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Bloemknop van een goudsbloem (Calendula officinalis) 03-07-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 15:20:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
  •   Info Flower bud in development of a Calendula officinalis Focus stack of 13 images. The diameter of the flower bud in this photo is ± 16 mm.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice quality and something different! --Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice indeed! Aha! Je hebt nu een foto staplen-programma. Super goed! This brings to mind one of the most famous Swedish poems (English translation and German) by Karin Boye. --Cart (talk) 15:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --StellarHalo (talk) 16:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful. -- King of ♥ 16:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Nice, and interesting plant. Yet if you look at the background, even in preview you can see kind of posterization all over the picture. And if you look closely, something went wrong at the top + at the bottom edge. Can you do something about it? --A.Savin 18:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment You need to reprocess this asap Famberhorst. Something has gone seriously wrong. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Abstain for now - the odd banding at the top and bottom definitely needs to be fixed. Once issues are corrected this is definitely FP. Cmao20 (talk) 22:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cmao20 (talk) 18:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I love this photo and hadn't noticed the banding when I saw it on QIC. I'll wait for the fixes to be made. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Done. correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  • OK, and what about the posterization, and all the strange spots in the bottom-right corner? Any chance to get a better background? New development maybe? --A.Savin 07:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think they are dew drops. That part of the green leaf was closest to the camera lens. Making it slightly more visible.--Famberhorst (talk) 10:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Supportnot ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:50, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Basotxerri (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support looks like penne pasta. Tomer T (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Buidhe (talk) 08:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The flower bud is great; assume that the spots in the background are really dew drops etc. --Aristeas (talk) 11:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 22:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 20:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Ostrich fern at Myrstigen trail 1.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 11:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:View from McQueen Pass towards Lyttelton Harbour, New Zealand.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 09:42:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Vincent van Gogh - Zonnebloemen - Google Art Project.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2020 at 04:05:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Comment @Gnosis: O_O... Hmm, I may have been a bit too hasty in choosing the version to nominate. Let me decide if I want to let this one be promoted and then nominate it for delist and replace later or ping everyone else who has voted to support and ask them if they would prefer your version. --StellarHalo (talk) 19:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Bombing of Concordia Vega oil refinery in Ploești by USAAF B-24s, 31 May 1944 — restored.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 22:25:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1950
  •   Info created by Richard R. Ganczak (USAAF bombardier) - restored by Buidhe - nominated by Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Buidhe (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment This has a lot of wow to me, but it looks like you upsized it. Please address that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @Ikan Kekek: I overwrote a lower-resolution version of the same image based on the high-resolution TIFF from Library of Congress [1] (which is listed as the source in the image description). Buidhe (talk) 23:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Great scene, but I'm bothered by the distracting triangle at the top left corner. -- King of ♥ 01:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment As I see it, that can't be helped because it's part of a plane. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Very dramatic photo, and per Ikan's point about the triangle. Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The triangle at the top left is regrettable but I will let it slide considering the context of the photo. --StellarHalo (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- KennyOMG (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Réfection de la peinture de la Tour Eiffel, 1924 - Gallica.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 15:40:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1920-1930
  •   Info created by Agence de presse Meurisse - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question Wouldn't it benefit from restoration? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I believe the repeated noise pattern can be fixed by photo editing tools. Also, the light streak on the left side of the photo should be fixed, and the restoration work that the nom has done, at full resolution looks like smudges against the noise pattern. (Hint: The heal tool usually works much better than paintbrush or smudger at preserving texture). Buidhe (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment The Gallica link isn't working right now, supposedly because of high volume. I would like to support and don't care about the grain (noise, whatever), but the smudges are odd at full size and should be fixed for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I would really like to support this one, as it is a great photo, but a more complex restauration, according e.g. to Buidhe’s hints, would be welcome. The smudges mentioned by Buidhe are irritating. --Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Tiny house surrounded by trees, inhabited in the middle of green paddy fields in sunshine under a stormy sky at golden hour in Laos.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 00:21:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Lol :-) It was last year, so to be honest I don't remember what happened next. I always walk with a waterproof bag. But one thing is sure, the sun might have disappeared in the minute after this shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Buidhe (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support But I would remove the bright spot in the sky (above the trees just a bit left of the person) -- Llez (talk) 07:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Certainly an insect. Gone, now. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I hope you told him that smoking is bad for his health... Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  • It depends what she smokes :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Dramatic light. --Aristeas (talk) 08:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cart (talk) 09:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support We get similar light conditions here in New Zealand quite often in the spring. It's a very special light and I really like nearly everything what gets shot under these conditions! --Podzemnik (talk) 09:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 13:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Water reflection of mountains, hut, green rice sheaves scattered in a paddy field and clouds with blue sky in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 00:19:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

*  Support--Dr. Otztafan Kolibril (talk) 10:39, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." You have only done 16 edits. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --Cart (talk) 10:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:29, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --PierreSelim (talk) 12:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 13:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Very beautiful indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question What is the rectangular yellow object above the rock?-- Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Thank you for your explanation. --Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Poco a poco (talk) 15:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ermell (talk) 22:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Andrei (talk) 11:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Caterpillar of Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758) – Plain Tiger feeding on Calotropis.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 12:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Blue tiger (Tirumala limniace exoticus) male underside.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 22:32:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Hummingbird hawk moth (Macroglossum stellatarum) in flight.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 13:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  •   Comment Up to 3 cm I guess. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Mine was a really big oneǃ Oopsǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Congratulations!.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 13:26:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  •   Info created by Brandon O'Connor, US Army - uploaded by Killarnee - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Needs a much better file name. We had a similar nom a while back, if this looks familiar. --Cart (talk) 13:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
    • The resolution of this photo is significantly higher, while most of the opposition on the 2019 nom was due to insufficient resolution. Buidhe (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Yep, I know. Just delivering the info. --Cart (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Nice dramatic shot but clearly tilted, and quite blurry at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 15:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Cmao20. Buidhe (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Cmao20. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:36, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose All the feet are cut off -- Llez (talk) 07:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It’s a pity: the other nomination had a good composition, but was low resolution; this one is better in terms of resultion, but the composition is poor. --Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

*  Oppose not good enough --Dr. Otztafan Kolibril (talk) 10:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." You have only done 16 edits. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --Cart (talk) 10:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I usually don't like to pile on oppose, but this kind of dramatic shot needs at least some editing to fix: the tilt, and possibly part of the horizontal distortion and keep the vertical distortion it's what makes the pictures wow! --PierreSelim (talk) 12:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose While this image is sort of close to home geographically, its composition is, as others have suggested, kind of random, and there are better ways to take this sort of picture. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Yad Vashem View.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 11:10:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Lichenostomus flavicollis stealing hair from Thylogale billardierii for nest - Melaleuca.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 05:39:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:POL COA Trzaska.svg (delist)Edit

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 02:02:29
 

  •   Info There are countless of these coats of arms of same or similar quality either made by Bastianow or deriative of/heavily using elements from his works (See this category or its subcategories) and this one does not stand out from any of them and is nothing special as far as computer generated coats of arms go. (Original nomination)
  •   Delist As someone interested in royalty and nobility, I have seen numerous CG coats of arms on Commons and the standards for them have come a really really long way in the past 13 years. This image just pales in comparison to the ones created by the likes of Glasshouse, Heralder, and Sodacan, to name a few. --StellarHalo (talk) 02:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delist A fine image, but it does not stand out as one of the absolute best examples of CG coat of arms that we have on Commons. Buidhe (talk) 02:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delist per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delist -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delist per others.--Peulle (talk) 21:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delist per others. Cmao20 (talk) 23:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delist per others. Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img19 Topkapı Palace.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 22:15:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
  •   Info Dome ceiling of the Queen Mother's Apartments in Harem of Topkapı Palace, Istanbul ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 22:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --A.Savin 22:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Very nice dome, but too much noise for FP. Based on your Photoshop exposure adjustments it looks like you're using the equivalent of ISO 800 or so. -- King of ♥ 22:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Beautiful. I wouldn't do any noise reduction to be honest. A fine grain like this is better than a smudgy picture with too much NR. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support and agreed with Cmao20 -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Really beautiful. A little bit noise is OK for me, because I assume that the dome is quite dark in reality. (If you want to apply additional noise reduction, please be very careful; IMHO a little bit noise is better than soft mush.) --Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Noise is ok to me --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Llez (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Per KoH Poco a poco (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Gnosis (talk) 01:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Wrocław - widok z Wyspy Slodowej - wyspa Tamka.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 16:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
  •   Info Inspired by Andrei's excellent nomination, another lovely image of the city of Wroclaw by Jar.ciurus. Ostrów Tumski ('Cathedral Island') is the oldest part of Wroclaw, consisting of mainly religious buildings dating as far back as the twelfth century. It's a very historic site that also contains the former residence of Nicolaus Copernicus. created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Thank you! --Andrei (talk) 19:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I am seeing a halo effect on the buildings at full size. Buidhe (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Maybe a slight sharpening halo, yes. Not a lot I can do about it without having access to the original RAW files though. IMO it's too minor a flaw to spoil my enjoyment of the picture. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Not perfect in details, but very beautiful and atmospheric. — I wish Jar.ciurus would respond to hints about improving some details in his nice photos – many of them are very good and could be excellent with a little bit of extra work. ;–) Does somebody have an idea how to contact him? --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Seven Pandas (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Vietnamkrieg Bootsflüchtling 1980.jpg (delist)Edit

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 12:19:50
 

  •   Info 2005 promotion (Original nomination), obvious and distracting damage to the original negative without restoration being done. Also, the image would look substantially better with a conversion of the greenish duotone to grayscale and a levels adjustment.
  •   Delist -- Buidhe (talk) 12:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question Where can we see the original negative? The "Source" link is 404. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
    • The image is also sold by Alamy apparently.[2] where it's credited to "Pictures From History" (which credits the image to CPA media, apparently public domain [3]) Buidhe (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
      • The source website can be found on Wayback Machine[4] but it doesn't have this image on it. Buidhe (talk) 23:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the sleuthing. I'll vote to   Delist on the basis that nowadays, we'd insist on a digital restoration of the image for anything more than VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

File:La chaleur à Paris, fillette prenant de l'eau à une borne-fontaine, 1921 - Gallica.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 08:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Sunset over Trommekilen from Norrkila 6.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 06:22:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Sweden
  •   Info After taking the photos of the hill with the birds, I was about to pack up and go home when I met some other photographers. We started to chat and it got late. Because of that we were rewarded with the most colorful sunset I've ever seen. It went through all the colors you can think of. Later, three very mosquito-bitten but happy photographers went home with full SD cards. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Cart (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Stands out against the wast plentitude of photographs taken around sunset by the not-so-common colouring, the subtle composition and the calm, peaceful atmosphere. (Many photos taken around sunset boast with their many garish colours and seem to cry “Watch me! I am spectacular!”; it is refreshing to see sunset/after sunset photos which present their beauty without crying.) --Aristeas (talk) 11:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support but wish the lower left corner were sharper. (What's causing it? There shouldn't be DOF issues at f/5.6 on a 1" sensor.) -- King of ♥ 13:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I think it's mostly due to that is was a very dark/shadow-y part of the photo and I had to raise the shadows there quite a bit. This camera does not handle really dark areas that well. It is a re-occurring comment on my photos. In this case, I'd rather have a not so sharp area than a dense black blob. (This was taken before a kind user here, I think it was Basotxerri, told me about a function to improve this. I'm using it these days.) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Aristeas - better for the more subtle colours. Cmao20 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I love that juxtaposition of the moored boats that are a frequent subject of yours with the refinery (One evening, from that angle, I wonder if you could get lightning behind it for a sort of Blade Runner opening-credits effect (like this)) Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker der US Army -- 2020 -- 8388.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 13:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
  •   Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 13:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Info It's a detail view of a door lock of a bunker. --XRay talk 13:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- XRay talk 13:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I think it would work better without the thin extra details on the sides. A crop along the metal would be more harmonious for me at least. The extra info the sides provide is redundant. --Cart (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I think you're right. I've the small crop. --XRay talk 14:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support It could be a bit sharper, but nice colours and overall a very good idea. Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- King of ♥ 20:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Intriguing. Also fixed the gallery since we have other door locks among the door. --Cart (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:16, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Buidhe (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Cmao20 --Llez (talk) 09:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   SupportRhododendrites talk |  18:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sure, a good thought, but the form doesn't work for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cart. Love the abstractions. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Abstract composition. Textured patchwork with metallic hieroglyphs -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019 04.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 09:37:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Czech_Republic
  •   Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 09:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Pudelek (talk) 09:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support truly amazing Buidhe (talk) 10:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm less wowed, sorry. I see this kind of scene at home every winter, so for me to support an FP like this one I'd need higher resolution and really crisp quality. This one seems to be losing its detail a bit on the right side.--Peulle (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I'm with Peulle on this one. It's a nice winter photo, but not special in any way, and the plane trails in the sky do nothing for the image. I'm sure that when you took it, the snow was glittering in the sun and the mist in the distance seemed magical, but such things rarely translates well into a photo. It could also be sharper. --Cart (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Underexposed. -- King of ♥ 14:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I like it. Maybe it's a tiny bit low on wow, but the quality is good and I find it nice and atmospheric - I can almost feel the frost! Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The quality is nice and all but this view is just not special enough. --StellarHalo (talk) 23:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Seems like a rather random section of woods, and the snow doesn't raise it up enough. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

File:20191204 Funambulus pennantii, Agra 0936 6598 DxO.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 17:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
  •   Info all by me Jakubhal -- Jakubhal 17:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Jakubhal 17:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose If you have to feed the squirrel to get a photo, should be easy to get a better PoV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
    • I did not feed it to get this photo, if it matters. -- Jakubhal 05:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose It's very cute and it definitely deserves to be QI. But the background and point of view are a bit so-so as Charles says. It's nice and sharp, but 4.3mpx resolution is not high for an FP these days. Overall if it were twice this resolution I think I'd support, but as it is the image's good points are not quite enough to make it one of the best on Commons to me. Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I just looked through all the squirrel and chipmunk FPs. A lot of them date from the time before 2 MP was the required minimum and some of them should probably be delisted, but I think this stands up well compared to even some relatively recent FPs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Is this downsized Jakubhal? Don't imagine it is croppedIkan Kekek. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • Charlesjsharp the picture was taken from the distance about two meters (if I remember it right) and is cropped. Please do no assume anything, like "feeding from hand". I could probably do it and get closer, but when I met this critter it was eating what he found or got earlier and fled when I came closer -- Jakubhal 11:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
      • This is original RAW downsized for comparision. -- Jakubhal 11:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the explanation. I hadn't noticed the lens you used. I understand now that someone else had just fed it. Feeding these squirrels is ubiquitous in Agra and nearby sights. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
        • From a biased perspective, I think this image is a better FP candidate. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. -- King of ♥ 14:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with Cmao20. These top-down photos of animals are usually not a good idea unless the shadow or something can provide something extra. --Cart (talk) 20:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Cmao and Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of a shabestan in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 16:36:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
  •   Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Lovely image, but it's cut off so you can't see the entire ceiling. For a featured picture I expect that the entire subject is captured. Buidhe (talk) 22:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I get Buidhe's point, but, as Ikan Kekek often says, painters make crops like this all the time. In any case, for a 93mpx image with good quality even at immense full size, I don't feel inclined to complain. Cmao20 (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support maybe fix the file name to include capitals? --Andrei (talk) 07:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @Andrew J.Kurbiko: I fixed that in caption but I can't change the main file name.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
      •   Done move as author request, as I am a file mover. Buidhe (talk) 09:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 07:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I would prefer a square crop with all circles included. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --XRay talk 13:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- King of ♥ 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Moderate   Support: I would prefer to see more above and below the crops, but they're symmetrical and the result is beautiful and quite high-resolution. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Qualified support The Large Image viewer isn't working, but I like what I do see—it would make a great desktop—and I trust the other support !votes here. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

File:2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 10:08:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Chile
  •   Info created & uploaded by GRDN711 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Buidhe (talk) 10:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Resolution is a bit low, but the light makes up for it IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice light. -- Colin (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Interesting photo and a good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per previous speakers. --Aristeas (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral IMO the sharpness should be better. Why f/5.6? --XRay talk 13:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral To answer XRay's point, they probably used a polarizer. Why else would you need ISO 400 with an exposure setting of 1/250s at f/5.6? ISO 800 is venturing into dangerous territory for a landscape so f/5.6 is probably the best compromise. I think the technical quality is fine given the wow, but the sky looks weird; unfortunately you just can't use a polarizer on such a wide frame of view. -- King of ♥ 14:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ivar (talk) 16:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Meiræ 21:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Imo 1600px on the short edge is pretty low, in particular for a 7 image panorama made with a high quality camera, yet the image does not appear overly sharp. I also don't find the subject / composition overly interesting, although the light is quite nice. --DXR (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:American officer and French partisan crouch behind an auto during a street fight in a French city. - NARA - 531322 - restored by Buidhe.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 20:41:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1950
  •   Info created by unknown US Army Signal Corps photographer - uploaded by National Archives bot - restored and nominated by Buidhe. High historical value as it is used as the lead image of the article on the French Resistance on wikidata and in several Wikipedia languages (English, Spanish, Czech at minimum), and also the cover of a book (a different version of the image). I have benefitted from Adam Cuerden's helpful comments at the enwiki FPC. -- Buidhe (talk) 20:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Buidhe (talk) 20:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Indeed a striking photograph, and on a somewhat less grim subject than Nazi propaganda. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Llez (talk) 10:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Unfortunately the whole world is currently checked into the Hotel Corona. Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose This is obviously a posed photo. As per Nick-D's argument here. --Gnosis (talk) 06:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • I disagree that a staged photograph necessarily lacks EV. This one is widely used, so many people clearly think it is valuable. This painting does not accurately depict the Battle of Austerlitz, rather it is a staged composition, but it is used as the lead image because we have no better images to use. We already have at least one featured picture of staged World War II fighting. I submit that this case is much the same, as it is dangerous to take photographs when combat is actually occurring. Should we delist Adam Cuerden's opera posters because they are promotional, not particularly realistic, and don't necessarily offer an accurate representation of the opera in progress? (t · c) buidhe 21:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
    A staged photo doesn't have any historic significant, can't compare to a painting! sorry --Gnosis (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Regretful oppose. The posing photo can be beautiful and very convincing. However, here is the posing, which i can immediately see only the fake. People in the background ruined this shot, sorry -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Andrei (talk) 09:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Looking back years, decades or centuries later a staged picture can tell more about the times than regular photos. This one definitely does. -- KennyOMG (talk) 10:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
A high proportion of combat photos from World War II were posed, but usually not as blatantly as this one. --Gnosis (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
This is not Wikipedia Featured Pictures but Commons Featured Pictures. Whether an image carries any EV or historical significance, or even accuracy, should quite frankly be irrelevant (unless it adds to the image's value ofc). Having said that I'd actually argue that this image carries significant historical value as it represents how the allies tried/wanted to portray this part of WWII. -- KennyOMG (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per George Chernilevsky, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Nice restoration but the posing makes the photo not at all convincing in what it is trying to portray. Sorry. --StellarHalo (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose, posing becomes something you can't unsee and in fact makes you laugh. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Erste Frühlinsboten IMG 4059.jpgEdit

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 16:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Meyerbeer - Les Huguenots - Décor Acte II.jpgEdit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 06:44:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

IMHO, To correct this, a rotation without loss of proportion should be done and not only add a sharpness filter --Wilfredor (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)