Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦
ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。
概要 edit
推薦にあたって edit
推薦者のためのガイドライン edit
まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。
ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。
- 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル(1.92メガピクセル)は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。
- コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なPCモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。
- スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。
- フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。
- 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか(例:後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等)を確認しましょう。
- 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。
- デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング(切り取り)等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。
- 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
- たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
- 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
- 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。
技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。
- 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード(露光寛容度)と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合(部分)もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。
- 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ2本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも3分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する4つの交点の内どれか1つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。
- 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。 なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング(流し撮り)」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。
- 被写界深度(DOF)とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角(短焦点)レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠(長焦点)レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。
グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。
- 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。
- ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。
- 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。
- テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。
- 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。
- バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。
- 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。
- 主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。
- 『象徴性か妥当性か』 ー 『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。
- 画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。
画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。
新規推薦 edit
推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。
ステップ1:画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー&ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。
ステップ2:ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。
ステップ3:ステップ2で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}
投票 edit
投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します:
- {{支持}}または{{Support}} ( Support、 Support),
- {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} ( Oppose、 Oppose),
- {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} ( Neutral、 Neutral),
- {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} ( Comment、 Comment),
- 情報:{{Info}} ( Info),
- 質問:{{Question}} ( Question).
テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます(可能ならば英語で)。
あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや( Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名(~~~~)も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。
秀逸な画像からの除外 edit
時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}} Keep 及び {{維持}} Keep (=『秀逸な画像』に値する)、または{{Delist}} Delist 及び {{除外}} Oppose (=『秀逸な画像』に値しない)を投票します。
あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー&ペーストします。
あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。
- 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
- その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク(画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています)。
- あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。
次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}
秀逸な画像の候補での方針 edit
総則 edit
- 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後(下記タイムテーブル参照)に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。10日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
- 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
- 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
- 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" (推薦を取り下げます)と書くか、テンプレート
{{withdraw|~~~~}}
を加えます。 - ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト(将来的なプロジェクト含む)に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
- 推薦日から数えて5日間支持を受けられなかった画像(推薦者票含まず)は候補リストから外されます。(下記タイムテーブル参照)
- テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。
秀逸と除外のルール edit
候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。
- 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
- 最低5票以上の支持票を得ている。
- 支持:反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
- 2つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。
除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後5日間で提出者以外の Delist ( Oppose)票が得られなかった候補は、5日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。
常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。
何よりも礼儀を忘れずに edit
どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。
それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。
関連項目 edit
- 候補リストの編集はこちら:Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- 日付順秀逸な画像リスト:Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ:Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- 推薦・投票の完了方法:Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
- 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
- Photography critiques(画像評論)
- Help:スキャニング
目次 edit
秀逸な画像の候補 edit
Featured picture candidates edit
File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 001.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:PO boxes at the historic Chico Post Office (2024)-L1005460.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting and unusual subject, great find. There is a small amount of barrel and perspective distortion it seems? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The Leica Super-Elmar 21mm has an extremely low amount of distortion (virtually close to none). Please keep in mind that it's an old building. Oh, also: a good friend showed me this view. If someone deserves credit for finding this gem, it's him. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Река Коксу осенью 2.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 22:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created by Marat Nadjibaev - uploaded by Marat Nadjibaev - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great scenery, enhanced by the long exposure. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mountain View Cemetery1.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Canada
- Info: Boulder Mountain above the Mountain View Cemetery, Revelstoke, British Columbia; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order_:_Orthoptera_(Grasshoppers,_Crickets_and_Katydids)
- Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный wanna talk? 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Macrocallista nimbosa shell edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Left Valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Right valve (Extant)
-
Left valve (Extant)
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
- Info The set shows the shells (2 valves each) of two specimens of the same species. One shell, originating from the Lower Pleistocene, is about 1 - 1.5 million years old, the other is an extant specimen collected alive in 2003. Both specimens come from Florida; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Casio W-96H.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Coup de foudre et bateaux amarrées aux cotes de la Galite.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Lightning
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great picture. Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 22:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a shot! --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Impressive but it would nice to get rid of the green lines around the rock below the lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool shot! Красный wanna talk? 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Trier, 07-12-2023 (actm.) 26.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 04:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info When we are taking photographs, we pay attention to objects that are often overlooked, such as this rusty link chain with a ring anchored in an ancient quay wall near the Römerbrücke over the Moselle in Trier.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I am sorry, but not a Featured picture TOUMOU (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't feel anything too, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject isn't exceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing interesting here -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Residential by Carrer Sant Josep in Finestrat, Alicante, Spain, 2024 January.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
- Info A really unusual composition but I like it a great deal. created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support interesting compo. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moosheide im herbstlichen Morgenlicht (1).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
- Info IMO a really beautiful composition. created by GZagatta - uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great lights and composition, but there is vignating isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The solitary tree creates a wonderful mood of hope in the scenery. The slight vignetting emphasizes this, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:A Bonda tribe of Odisha drinking Mahua drink.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
- Info created and uploaded by Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi - nominated by iMahesh -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃǃ Terragio67 (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Year of Africa probably. --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Garo people at khagrachori 04.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info Uploaded by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Oroville State Theatre during blue hour (2024)-L1005456.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 05:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere. Wolverine XI 08:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The pink light is a special element in the composition. ★ 13:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support The lights are beautiful and the pink and blue colors together are also beautiful here and the accuracy in the crop of the image is even more decisive. I wish I had taken this photo. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An outstanding photograph that makes the viewer believe that the great era of American Art déco has returned. The light, angle, composition, and timing are perfect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:048 Lioness during golden hour of the morning at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Inspirational. Wolverine XI 08:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Amazing Stories, November 1928.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper illustrations in color
- Info created by Amazing Stories, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really cool artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Folk Dance performance at Kerala School Kalolsavam 2024.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 15:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info A folk dance performer dressed up like pre 1980 Indian woman's attire. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything here. The crop and background are bad; this image is not FP quality. Wolverine XI 08:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine XI. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Porta de aço elétrica.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
- Info Eletric roller shutter door. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This kind of photography is always interesting, but I can't find any wow here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very minimalist! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's the door of my office.
- (by the way, I just changed the category to Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism) ★ 23:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a bit of a grey area – though after all, they're not photography concepts that exist in isolated bubbles; an overlap is expected (and this is one of them). Cart's suggestion also makes sense. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Minimalism is fine when the light is special, or when something extra makes you feel "wow". Unfortunately here it is just a boring texture with uneven light, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I too would go with 'Texture Photography' on this. It makes most sense. --Cart (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the shutter white or grey in real life? BigDom (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- White, but the morning light made the top a little darker, grayish. ★ 00:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin, nothing wrong with it but just not speaking to me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Abacate.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Avocado fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support looks cool for me, nice composition. Красный wanna talk? 13:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Several aspects of this image make me feel this is not one of the best of the website. First, the background at the right and at the left, then the lack of sharpness in the corners, and finally the narrow depth of field, probably automatically set in the smartphone.
- The guidelines say "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." and here neither the subject is very difficult nor the quality exceptional, compared for example to focus stacked fruits or vegetables in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not very sharp and the irregularity of size means that this is a somewhat messy composition Cmao20 (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support disagree with Basile, but I'd be interested to see how a crop works out. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose lack of sharpness, light and compo are imo not outstanding. -- Ivar (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Barque sur une mer de sel à Chott Jrid.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 06:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great quality. Daftation (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Oversaturated? ★ 12:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poetic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really a better image after deciding to desaturate it. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning subject and composition. Image quality not perfect but doesnt matter because it's so lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Al Fahidi Bench.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 19:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Arab Emirates
- Info created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose overblown lights at the left. Would be much better with lights correction, but not sure if this is correctable at all. Красный wanna talk? 13:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think portrait works for this image. Wolverine XI 08:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I quite like the portrait composition but I think it needs a perspective correction and the tilt to be fixed, and I fear that this would make the bench a little too close to the edge of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Daftation (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Beyond the Black, Dancing In The Dark Tour, Stuttgart 2024 (28) (cropped).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 11:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info created by Robin Müller, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, impressive posture and facial expression. – Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Felino Volador (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 00:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe she is little a bit too much to left. But fine motion. --Mile (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Please fix the chromatic aberrations visible around the stones and the wall at the bottom right -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sur Lightroom, "Pinceau" (sélection) -> "Supprimer la frange" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Je n'ai pas lightroom. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pas de problème. Voir lien ci-dessus -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 21:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-15-36 FortDeRoppe.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Per above. ★ 23:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective problem, at the left. Wall is not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the floor is falling down. I prefer the other image, it is depped and the lights make it more interesting, this one is not wowing to me --Poco a poco (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Should be centered, and the left side is especially subpar. Wolverine XI 08:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per Poco. This one lacks something in terms of the composition, too much of the frame is just a bare wall. Quality is good but IMO QI not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) Mount Sheba.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info No FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose you said "No FP", therefore not an FP– jk, Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and plain background with an appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! BigDom (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the background! Wolverine XI 21:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Plains zebras (Equus quagga) Maputo.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:51:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
- Info Quite a few zebra FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice reflections. Cmao20 (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition.--Terragio67 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice mirror image, good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Photographers in Rabat.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 17:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it would be better without the two standing figures behind the photographers, but still good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support that standing fellows. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So this was taken without the subjects knowing they were photographed? —kallerna (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment —kallerna I would still say spontaneous shot, not planed. For candid, i would think bushmans with extra zoom, hiding and waiting some superstar by pool next house, so they know what are they waiting and probably know what kind of photo will they get. --Mile (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice typical tourists scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Funny but too busy compostion. It would work without the guy passing by in the background, with his finger on his nose. He seems embarrassed to be in the frame. The two ladies behind are also distracting. And the wall at the right has nothing special. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like the idea and it's a good candid shot of the photographers, very natural. I don't mind the wall on the right which adds to the candid nature, making you feel like you're watching these photographers from round a corner. But the people in the background, especially the man, are just too distracting for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average composition when taking background into account. --Thi (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and others. Yann (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and BigDom. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The guy bombs the photo, unfortunately. Wolverine XI 21:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 157.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 12:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young woman of the Mundari tribe in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pose. ★ 13:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning sharpness. Nice comp. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, composition, and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Theyyam, the dancing God, is a ritual art form of Kerala. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Again, not an FP with this crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing to say.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose some of the drummers are difficult to see against the background. Could be fixed with editing. Schierbecker (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tried my level best. Since it is a lowlight photography hard to remove shadows. Now please watch. If somebody helps to improve more i will send the original file on email.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Heavy noise reduction and tight framing but the masquerade is fascinating. Ermell (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
- Info Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east wall, with a height of 2400 m the highest mountain wall in the Alps; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Poco Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. Wolverine XI 03:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view of the highest mountain wall in the Alps (see nomination). – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scarlet Veil (51013483841).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Charlie Marshall, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by
YannSHB2000 - Support Perfect composition. -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann as uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We already have a similar FP of the same woman. ★ 13:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the other one is better, but this one is sufficiently different also to make FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know I live in a hurry, but you should wait a little longer. ★ 21:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Cart! SHB2000 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality of the existing FP is much better. Compare the eyes, the nose and the mouth. Also too similar to the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2024 -- 4263-7.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite an unusual perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I agree, but a nice light, though Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --.Karelj (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I have been going back and forth on this but I am not sure the composition really works. It feels like the wheel is a bit of an afterthought, placed at the edge of the frame. I think it would have worked better with more wheel and less OOF background Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The blurry background covers too much of the picture, while the wheel only covers a portion too small for my liking. --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support A very interesting and unusual composition, probably too unusual for us. It reminds me of some paintings which show a person looking at a distant landscape or town; in these paintings the nominal subject is that distant object, but they emphasize the person in order to allow the viewers to identify themselves with that person; so in some regard the real subject is the contemplation of the person who looks at that distant object (example). I vaguely remember some photographs which use the same approach, but combine it with a key feature of photography (the interplay of sharp and unsharp) by putting the focus on the person and throwing the landscape/town out of focus, still keeping it recognizable. Now in this photograph the wheel plays the role of the front person; the standing wheel seems to contemplate the great past and presence of that big industrial area. I guess my explanation is lengthy and unclear, but on these lines the composition actually works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the detailed, yet rather unusual review. I think it's very positive that my intention for the photo is clear. --XRay 💬 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Won't work for me. I cannot tell what the content is, Daftation (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition and black subject don't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Erzbunker -- 2024 -- 4214.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice frame, but the reflective portion is not--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Almost as beautiful as an Egyptian temple.--Ermell (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, artistic composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special, imo. An elegance of simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I do not understand the composition. Nice light though. —kallerna (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do understand the composition. It is special and the execution is excellent. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Himmeldunkberg Gipfelkreuz II.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 15:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info Summit cross on the Himmeldunkberg. In the background on the right the Kreuzberg. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Makes me feel cold just to look at it Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
NeutralSupport Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Comment Temporarily changing my supporting vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is resolved.-- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)- Support ★ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeSnow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good catch, Radomianin. I have taken the liberty to embed the sRGB profile with ExifTool. @Milseburg: This is just a little help, especially if you do not want to edit the image anymore; embedding a colour profile with ExifTool is a lossless operation and has no impact on the image data itself, so your image was not changed by this at all. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a usual sight from Germany. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I miss wow here. I like snowed landscapes, but preferably with virgin and white (I concur with Frank) snow, not the case here. I also find the crop at the top too tight. I believe that there was FP potential here but I just see a cross that cannot breath at the top, trampled grey snow and a bit of mountains. Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It works fine for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A wonderful view (I can only agree with Radomianin’s first comment); however I have to admit that the whites could be whiter – I have tried it, adjusting the white point makes the whole image even better. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Impressive landscape but as others have said, the white balance is off and the placement of the cross feels a little awkward. BigDom (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Frank Schulenburg.Ermell (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Cmao20, Radomianin, ArionStar, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, SHB2000, Famberhorst, Agnes Monkelbaan, Llez, Poco a poco, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, BigDom, Ermell, and MZaplotnik: Sorry for my absence and thank you for the reviews and criticism. I tried to take this to heart, washed the snow and uploaded a new version. Better and sufficient? --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for the revision, Milseburg. Your editing has significantly improved the picture. I have restored my original supporting vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
- Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support неплохо. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive like a painting, in my opinion. Thanks for the image improvement, Argenberg. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The light is great and the scene spectacular, but I personally haven't understood the composition. It isn't working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit noisy, but great light and composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco, too busy composition IMO. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 09:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
- Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by
YannF. Riedelio - Support Harmonious composition of a simple cup. -- Yann (talk) 09:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi F. Riedelio, nice photo, but the name is a bit too ambiguous for an FPC. Could you suggest a name that better describes the image? --Cart (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Renaming to "Gray espresso cup with amaretto" commissioned. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll fix this for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is a bit too tight in my opinion to make it to FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. New version with different cropping. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality, clear and effective composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, for me that is an empty cup. Nothing inside visible. -- -donald- (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. Description improved.
- The photo should represent a cup and not its contents.
- As the espresso is served in a half-full cup (about 40 ml), the contents would not be visible from this angle. F. Riedelio • 💬 10:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose When you try shots like this, you will have to clean all dust around. For instance, i spent 2-3 h with clock. Also, as above, cup is empty, its just a cup, so cookie and coffee would be nice, now just cookie without coffee and pic is named per coffee. Third objection, spoon could be new or without wearing scratches. I dont see EXIF, but this should be sharp photo (stacked image), here seems like one shot on to much closed Aperture. --Mile (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just a language note: This model of small cups are called "espresso cups" even if they are empty. It's a name for the cup size. (example) --Cart (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you put cookie, than i would expect coffee too. Now its a bit spoiled, both or none. It could see size by spoon. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Many thanks for the review and the tips.
- Unfortunately, the EXIF data has been lost due to the export from Lightroom. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thank you. for the the tip. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I believe that some of Mile's comments are too strict (like straches in the spoon) but he has got a point regarding the cookie with an empty cup. I also find the level of detail not the best for an studio photo. I'd have probably used focus stacking here Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Mile. —kallerna (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj 09:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dust and scratch improved, generative filling. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to continue the nomination. After this extensive discussion, I am looking forward to the outcome. Thank you in advance for your support.
- I have restored the older version of "Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg" and uploaded the modified photo as a new file "Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg". F. Riedelio • 💬 17:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that, you are now in charge of this nomination.
- You might also want to take a look at the coffee in File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg, the right side of the coffee looks like it's not totally ok. Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 08:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Platysteiridae (Wattle-eyes, batises and shrike-flycatchers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very good composition and pretty bird but the bird is quite small in the frame and also the resolution is not huge which means the actual pixel level detail on the bird itself is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. With wildlife photography it is unfortunately very hard to get close to every subject and some birds are more shy than others. This small bird unfortunately didn't stay very long (only a few seconds) while I was approaching very very slowly. Apparently there is only 5 pictures of it on commons and the highest quality one that got it in focus is this one, the second one only beeing of 853x1280 pixels. Out of these 5, only 3 males were photographed and the second highest resolution picture in focus of the male after this one beeing only of 600x400 pixels. There is also no FP of the species nor of the family. The bird was shot with a 600mm lens with a 50 million pixels sensor and as I recall the bird wasn't that far, but it's just a small and shy bird. We have pictures of the same resolution of still subjects that are less sharp. I think that in this picture the light was good and that the picture nicely shows the bird's environment. The feather detail is also quite good considering the bird size in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah you're right, I should be consistent Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The larger crop nicely shows the context and hints at the habitat. – Aristeas (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only 2,797 × 1,865 pixels and the bird in this image is very small. The background is too dominant in my opinion. Useful document, but not all the useful images on Commons should be featured. For a FP of a bird, you need at least to be able to see some fine details of the animals at full resolution, not only the branches where it lives. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. In my opinion it can not be expected the same level of detail for a small and shy bird where there is only a few seconds window to take a picture of it without possibility to go closer to it compared to pictures of still objects. Also, we have FP pictures of birds that have the same if not less definition than this one : 1, 2. I actually think this picture has enough level of detail compared to the bird size in real life and to the possibility to get close to it. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Small passerines like this one are among the most difficult subjects for bird photographers. They're skittish and notoriously hard to photograph. A big thank you to Giles for taking this excellent image and sharing it under a free license! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's amazing JJ Harrison managed to photograph so many of them in high resolution. Perhaps a matter of equipment -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a matter of resources. Harrison's lens costs about ten times more than Giles's. I think it's a bit unfair to other bird photographers that such expensive equipment should set the "standard" for FPs. We can only be grateful that people with very high-end cameras and lenses donate some photos to Commons, but I don't think they should set the bar for all the FPs in their special fields. Sometimes FPC can be a tad too elitist. --Cart (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- JJ Harrison sets the bar for birds like Kabelleger sets it for trains, or Iifar for focus stacked plants / fruits / insects. Equipment matters but also experience, explored places / subjects, patience, skill, chosen composition, etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I also wish more detail but I'm not an expert in bird photography and will support relying on Frank's opinion. What is definitely a minus in my eyes, is the crop, it's too generous. I'd definitely crop more everywhere, but above all the leaves at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed a very good composition: It emphasizes the reliefs on the lamp post, but adds the castle in the background, appropriately out of focus, to intimate the context. – Aristeas (talk) 16:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A composition to be taken into account. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I like the compo very much, the light is ok but the level of detail is low. It feels like the focus is below the sculptures, so that these are not really sharp. Could you also add some information about this piece? Poco a poco (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is probably the work of the architect Georg Adolph Demmler, probably made in 1845 during the reconstruction of the castle and bridge. However, it is difficult to find information about the lamp post. Maybe someone knows something more?. --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, halo effect around main subject. I also find the light rather dull. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 12:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good details, not a bad composition with the castle at right, and of course QI, but dull light and no "Wow" effect for me. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:St Julian church in St-Julien-de-Toursac (6).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:56:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light, strong distortion. Yann (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed. Light is a bit grey but in this instance I think it doesn't detract. Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like how you've worked the scene that day, but I agree with Yann about the dull lighting conditions. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI, but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light. No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, the subject/combo is not that extraordinary that compensates the lighting Poco a poco (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Passo delle Streghe - Monte Titano - San Marino - GT 05 - 2024 04 30.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 06:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#San Marino
- The witches' pass (or Passo delle Streghe) is one of the attractions of San Marino, it is a shortcut that leads from the first tower (Guaita) to the second tower (Cesta) depicted in the background. It puts everyone in great fear due to the steep slope and the overhang on the sides. In the background the fortifications near the tower are literally devoured by nature every spring, each time giving a charm of mystery to the castle located on Mount Titan. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A very nice view and I would be happy to support it. But (sorry to say this) at the branches at the left there are some odd transitions – see image note; maybe a stacking error? It would be great if you could fix this. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now. Thank you very much! – Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It would be great if you could document the amount of frames you require for a shot like this one Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are 18 stitched portrait images (6x3). I used Hugin (a free software) to merge all the images. Each image has a resolution of 24 megapixels (4000x6000), but I mainly only used the central parts of the images (2200x3300), because they offer greater guarantees of success being sharper than the edge. Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO a bit busy composition, dull light. —kallerna (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
秀逸除外候補 edit
Featured picture candidates edit
File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 001.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
- Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:PO boxes at the historic Chico Post Office (2024)-L1005460.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting and unusual subject, great find. There is a small amount of barrel and perspective distortion it seems? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The Leica Super-Elmar 21mm has an extremely low amount of distortion (virtually close to none). Please keep in mind that it's an old building. Oh, also: a good friend showed me this view. If someone deserves credit for finding this gem, it's him. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Река Коксу осенью 2.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 22:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created by Marat Nadjibaev - uploaded by Marat Nadjibaev - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great scenery, enhanced by the long exposure. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mountain View Cemetery1.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Canada
- Info: Boulder Mountain above the Mountain View Cemetery, Revelstoke, British Columbia; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order_:_Orthoptera_(Grasshoppers,_Crickets_and_Katydids)
- Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный wanna talk? 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Macrocallista nimbosa shell edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Left Valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
-
Right valve (Extant)
-
Left valve (Extant)
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
- Info The set shows the shells (2 valves each) of two specimens of the same species. One shell, originating from the Lower Pleistocene, is about 1 - 1.5 million years old, the other is an extant specimen collected alive in 2003. Both specimens come from Florida; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Casio W-96H.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Coup de foudre et bateaux amarrées aux cotes de la Galite.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Lightning
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great picture. Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 22:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a shot! --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Impressive but it would nice to get rid of the green lines around the rock below the lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool shot! Красный wanna talk? 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Trier, 07-12-2023 (actm.) 26.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 04:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info When we are taking photographs, we pay attention to objects that are often overlooked, such as this rusty link chain with a ring anchored in an ancient quay wall near the Römerbrücke over the Moselle in Trier.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I am sorry, but not a Featured picture TOUMOU (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't feel anything too, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject isn't exceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing interesting here -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Residential by Carrer Sant Josep in Finestrat, Alicante, Spain, 2024 January.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
- Info A really unusual composition but I like it a great deal. created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support interesting compo. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moosheide im herbstlichen Morgenlicht (1).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
- Info IMO a really beautiful composition. created by GZagatta - uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great lights and composition, but there is vignating isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The solitary tree creates a wonderful mood of hope in the scenery. The slight vignetting emphasizes this, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:A Bonda tribe of Odisha drinking Mahua drink.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
- Info created and uploaded by Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi - nominated by iMahesh -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃǃ Terragio67 (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Year of Africa probably. --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Garo people at khagrachori 04.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info Uploaded by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Oroville State Theatre during blue hour (2024)-L1005456.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 05:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere. Wolverine XI 08:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The pink light is a special element in the composition. ★ 13:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support The lights are beautiful and the pink and blue colors together are also beautiful here and the accuracy in the crop of the image is even more decisive. I wish I had taken this photo. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An outstanding photograph that makes the viewer believe that the great era of American Art déco has returned. The light, angle, composition, and timing are perfect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:048 Lioness during golden hour of the morning at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Inspirational. Wolverine XI 08:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Amazing Stories, November 1928.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper illustrations in color
- Info created by Amazing Stories, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really cool artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Folk Dance performance at Kerala School Kalolsavam 2024.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 15:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info A folk dance performer dressed up like pre 1980 Indian woman's attire. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything here. The crop and background are bad; this image is not FP quality. Wolverine XI 08:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine XI. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Porta de aço elétrica.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
- Info Eletric roller shutter door. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This kind of photography is always interesting, but I can't find any wow here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very minimalist! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's the door of my office.
- (by the way, I just changed the category to Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism) ★ 23:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a bit of a grey area – though after all, they're not photography concepts that exist in isolated bubbles; an overlap is expected (and this is one of them). Cart's suggestion also makes sense. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm in doubt between Abstract, Minimalism or Texture Photography… ★ 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Minimalism is fine when the light is special, or when something extra makes you feel "wow". Unfortunately here it is just a boring texture with uneven light, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I too would go with 'Texture Photography' on this. It makes most sense. --Cart (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the shutter white or grey in real life? BigDom (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- White, but the morning light made the top a little darker, grayish. ★ 00:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin, nothing wrong with it but just not speaking to me. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Abacate.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 11:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Avocado fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support looks cool for me, nice composition. Красный wanna talk? 13:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Several aspects of this image make me feel this is not one of the best of the website. First, the background at the right and at the left, then the lack of sharpness in the corners, and finally the narrow depth of field, probably automatically set in the smartphone.
- The guidelines say "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." and here neither the subject is very difficult nor the quality exceptional, compared for example to focus stacked fruits or vegetables in the same gallery -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not very sharp and the irregularity of size means that this is a somewhat messy composition Cmao20 (talk) 03:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support disagree with Basile, but I'd be interested to see how a crop works out. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose lack of sharpness, light and compo are imo not outstanding. -- Ivar (talk) 11:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Barque sur une mer de sel à Chott Jrid.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 06:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great quality. Daftation (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Oversaturated? ★ 12:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poetic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really a better image after deciding to desaturate it. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning subject and composition. Image quality not perfect but doesnt matter because it's so lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Al Fahidi Bench.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 19:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Arab Emirates
- Info created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose overblown lights at the left. Would be much better with lights correction, but not sure if this is correctable at all. Красный wanna talk? 13:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think portrait works for this image. Wolverine XI 08:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I quite like the portrait composition but I think it needs a perspective correction and the tilt to be fixed, and I fear that this would make the bench a little too close to the edge of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Daftation (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Beyond the Black, Dancing In The Dark Tour, Stuttgart 2024 (28) (cropped).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 11:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info created by Robin Müller, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, impressive posture and facial expression. – Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Felino Volador (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 00:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe she is little a bit too much to left. But fine motion. --Mile (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Please fix the chromatic aberrations visible around the stones and the wall at the bottom right -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sur Lightroom, "Pinceau" (sélection) -> "Supprimer la frange" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Je n'ai pas lightroom. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pas de problème. Voir lien ci-dessus -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 21:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-15-36 FortDeRoppe.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Per above. ★ 23:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective problem, at the left. Wall is not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the floor is falling down. I prefer the other image, it is depped and the lights make it more interesting, this one is not wowing to me --Poco a poco (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Should be centered, and the left side is especially subpar. Wolverine XI 08:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but per Poco. This one lacks something in terms of the composition, too much of the frame is just a bare wall. Quality is good but IMO QI not FP. Cmao20 (talk) 03:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) Mount Sheba.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info No FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose you said "No FP", therefore not an FP– jk, Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and plain background with an appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! BigDom (talk) 08:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the background! Wolverine XI 21:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Plains zebras (Equus quagga) Maputo.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:51:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
- Info Quite a few zebra FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice reflections. Cmao20 (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition.--Terragio67 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice mirror image, good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Photographers in Rabat.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 17:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it would be better without the two standing figures behind the photographers, but still good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support that standing fellows. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So this was taken without the subjects knowing they were photographed? —kallerna (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment —kallerna I would still say spontaneous shot, not planed. For candid, i would think bushmans with extra zoom, hiding and waiting some superstar by pool next house, so they know what are they waiting and probably know what kind of photo will they get. --Mile (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice typical tourists scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Funny but too busy compostion. It would work without the guy passing by in the background, with his finger on his nose. He seems embarrassed to be in the frame. The two ladies behind are also distracting. And the wall at the right has nothing special. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like the idea and it's a good candid shot of the photographers, very natural. I don't mind the wall on the right which adds to the candid nature, making you feel like you're watching these photographers from round a corner. But the people in the background, especially the man, are just too distracting for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average composition when taking background into account. --Thi (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and others. Yann (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile and BigDom. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The guy bombs the photo, unfortunately. Wolverine XI 21:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 157.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 12:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young woman of the Mundari tribe in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pose. ★ 13:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning sharpness. Nice comp. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, composition, and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Theyyam, the dancing God, is a ritual art form of Kerala. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Again, not an FP with this crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing to say.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose some of the drummers are difficult to see against the background. Could be fixed with editing. Schierbecker (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Tried my level best. Since it is a lowlight photography hard to remove shadows. Now please watch. If somebody helps to improve more i will send the original file on email.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Heavy noise reduction and tight framing but the masquerade is fascinating. Ermell (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
- Info Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east wall, with a height of 2400 m the highest mountain wall in the Alps; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Poco Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. Wolverine XI 03:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view of the highest mountain wall in the Alps (see nomination). – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scarlet Veil (51013483841).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Charlie Marshall, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by
YannSHB2000 - Support Perfect composition. -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann as uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We already have a similar FP of the same woman. ★ 13:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the other one is better, but this one is sufficiently different also to make FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know I live in a hurry, but you should wait a little longer. ★ 21:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Cart! SHB2000 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality of the existing FP is much better. Compare the eyes, the nose and the mouth. Also too similar to the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2024 -- 4263-7.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite an unusual perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I agree, but a nice light, though Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --.Karelj (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I have been going back and forth on this but I am not sure the composition really works. It feels like the wheel is a bit of an afterthought, placed at the edge of the frame. I think it would have worked better with more wheel and less OOF background Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The blurry background covers too much of the picture, while the wheel only covers a portion too small for my liking. --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support A very interesting and unusual composition, probably too unusual for us. It reminds me of some paintings which show a person looking at a distant landscape or town; in these paintings the nominal subject is that distant object, but they emphasize the person in order to allow the viewers to identify themselves with that person; so in some regard the real subject is the contemplation of the person who looks at that distant object (example). I vaguely remember some photographs which use the same approach, but combine it with a key feature of photography (the interplay of sharp and unsharp) by putting the focus on the person and throwing the landscape/town out of focus, still keeping it recognizable. Now in this photograph the wheel plays the role of the front person; the standing wheel seems to contemplate the great past and presence of that big industrial area. I guess my explanation is lengthy and unclear, but on these lines the composition actually works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the detailed, yet rather unusual review. I think it's very positive that my intention for the photo is clear. --XRay 💬 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Won't work for me. I cannot tell what the content is, Daftation (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition and black subject don't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Erzbunker -- 2024 -- 4214.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice frame, but the reflective portion is not--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Almost as beautiful as an Egyptian temple.--Ermell (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, artistic composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special, imo. An elegance of simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I do not understand the composition. Nice light though. —kallerna (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do understand the composition. It is special and the execution is excellent. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Himmeldunkberg Gipfelkreuz II.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 15:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info Summit cross on the Himmeldunkberg. In the background on the right the Kreuzberg. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Makes me feel cold just to look at it Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
NeutralSupport Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Comment Temporarily changing my supporting vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is resolved.-- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)- Support ★ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeSnow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good catch, Radomianin. I have taken the liberty to embed the sRGB profile with ExifTool. @Milseburg: This is just a little help, especially if you do not want to edit the image anymore; embedding a colour profile with ExifTool is a lossless operation and has no impact on the image data itself, so your image was not changed by this at all. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a usual sight from Germany. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I miss wow here. I like snowed landscapes, but preferably with virgin and white (I concur with Frank) snow, not the case here. I also find the crop at the top too tight. I believe that there was FP potential here but I just see a cross that cannot breath at the top, trampled grey snow and a bit of mountains. Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It works fine for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A wonderful view (I can only agree with Radomianin’s first comment); however I have to admit that the whites could be whiter – I have tried it, adjusting the white point makes the whole image even better. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Impressive landscape but as others have said, the white balance is off and the placement of the cross feels a little awkward. BigDom (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Frank Schulenburg.Ermell (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Cmao20, Radomianin, ArionStar, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, SHB2000, Famberhorst, Agnes Monkelbaan, Llez, Poco a poco, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, BigDom, Ermell, and MZaplotnik: Sorry for my absence and thank you for the reviews and criticism. I tried to take this to heart, washed the snow and uploaded a new version. Better and sufficient? --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for the revision, Milseburg. Your editing has significantly improved the picture. I have restored my original supporting vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
- Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support неплохо. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive like a painting, in my opinion. Thanks for the image improvement, Argenberg. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The light is great and the scene spectacular, but I personally haven't understood the composition. It isn't working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit noisy, but great light and composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco, too busy composition IMO. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 09:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
- Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by
YannF. Riedelio - Support Harmonious composition of a simple cup. -- Yann (talk) 09:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi F. Riedelio, nice photo, but the name is a bit too ambiguous for an FPC. Could you suggest a name that better describes the image? --Cart (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Renaming to "Gray espresso cup with amaretto" commissioned. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll fix this for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is a bit too tight in my opinion to make it to FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. New version with different cropping. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality, clear and effective composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, for me that is an empty cup. Nothing inside visible. -- -donald- (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. Description improved.
- The photo should represent a cup and not its contents.
- As the espresso is served in a half-full cup (about 40 ml), the contents would not be visible from this angle. F. Riedelio • 💬 10:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose When you try shots like this, you will have to clean all dust around. For instance, i spent 2-3 h with clock. Also, as above, cup is empty, its just a cup, so cookie and coffee would be nice, now just cookie without coffee and pic is named per coffee. Third objection, spoon could be new or without wearing scratches. I dont see EXIF, but this should be sharp photo (stacked image), here seems like one shot on to much closed Aperture. --Mile (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just a language note: This model of small cups are called "espresso cups" even if they are empty. It's a name for the cup size. (example) --Cart (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you put cookie, than i would expect coffee too. Now its a bit spoiled, both or none. It could see size by spoon. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Many thanks for the review and the tips.
- Unfortunately, the EXIF data has been lost due to the export from Lightroom. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thank you. for the the tip. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I believe that some of Mile's comments are too strict (like straches in the spoon) but he has got a point regarding the cookie with an empty cup. I also find the level of detail not the best for an studio photo. I'd have probably used focus stacking here Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Mile. —kallerna (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj 09:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Dust and scratch improved, generative filling. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I would like to continue the nomination. After this extensive discussion, I am looking forward to the outcome. Thank you in advance for your support.
- I have restored the older version of "Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg" and uploaded the modified photo as a new file "Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg". F. Riedelio • 💬 17:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that, you are now in charge of this nomination.
- You might also want to take a look at the coffee in File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto 1.jpg, the right side of the coffee looks like it's not totally ok. Good luck with your nom! --Cart (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, do you want to take over the nomination from Yann? You don't have any current nominations yourself so you can do that and let the nom continue until the end of the voting period if you like. If you say yes, I'll fix the code for the takeover for you. Also, you should not have uploaded the cup with coffee over the original photo, but instead uploaded it as a separate new file especially since the empty cup file has been assessed as a QI. This is a too big change. The empty cup image is valuable for the wiki project too, we need both. The filled in cup should have been offered as an 'Alternative' on this nom, or perhaps as a completely new nom. This needs to be sorted out, I can help you if you like. --Cart (talk) 15:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 08:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Platysteiridae (Wattle-eyes, batises and shrike-flycatchers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very good composition and pretty bird but the bird is quite small in the frame and also the resolution is not huge which means the actual pixel level detail on the bird itself is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. With wildlife photography it is unfortunately very hard to get close to every subject and some birds are more shy than others. This small bird unfortunately didn't stay very long (only a few seconds) while I was approaching very very slowly. Apparently there is only 5 pictures of it on commons and the highest quality one that got it in focus is this one, the second one only beeing of 853x1280 pixels. Out of these 5, only 3 males were photographed and the second highest resolution picture in focus of the male after this one beeing only of 600x400 pixels. There is also no FP of the species nor of the family. The bird was shot with a 600mm lens with a 50 million pixels sensor and as I recall the bird wasn't that far, but it's just a small and shy bird. We have pictures of the same resolution of still subjects that are less sharp. I think that in this picture the light was good and that the picture nicely shows the bird's environment. The feather detail is also quite good considering the bird size in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah you're right, I should be consistent Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The larger crop nicely shows the context and hints at the habitat. – Aristeas (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only 2,797 × 1,865 pixels and the bird in this image is very small. The background is too dominant in my opinion. Useful document, but not all the useful images on Commons should be featured. For a FP of a bird, you need at least to be able to see some fine details of the animals at full resolution, not only the branches where it lives. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. In my opinion it can not be expected the same level of detail for a small and shy bird where there is only a few seconds window to take a picture of it without possibility to go closer to it compared to pictures of still objects. Also, we have FP pictures of birds that have the same if not less definition than this one : 1, 2. I actually think this picture has enough level of detail compared to the bird size in real life and to the possibility to get close to it. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Small passerines like this one are among the most difficult subjects for bird photographers. They're skittish and notoriously hard to photograph. A big thank you to Giles for taking this excellent image and sharing it under a free license! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's amazing JJ Harrison managed to photograph so many of them in high resolution. Perhaps a matter of equipment -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a matter of resources. Harrison's lens costs about ten times more than Giles's. I think it's a bit unfair to other bird photographers that such expensive equipment should set the "standard" for FPs. We can only be grateful that people with very high-end cameras and lenses donate some photos to Commons, but I don't think they should set the bar for all the FPs in their special fields. Sometimes FPC can be a tad too elitist. --Cart (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- JJ Harrison sets the bar for birds like Kabelleger sets it for trains, or Iifar for focus stacked plants / fruits / insects. Equipment matters but also experience, explored places / subjects, patience, skill, chosen composition, etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I also wish more detail but I'm not an expert in bird photography and will support relying on Frank's opinion. What is definitely a minus in my eyes, is the crop, it's too generous. I'd definitely crop more everywhere, but above all the leaves at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed a very good composition: It emphasizes the reliefs on the lamp post, but adds the castle in the background, appropriately out of focus, to intimate the context. – Aristeas (talk) 16:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A composition to be taken into account. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I like the compo very much, the light is ok but the level of detail is low. It feels like the focus is below the sculptures, so that these are not really sharp. Could you also add some information about this piece? Poco a poco (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is probably the work of the architect Georg Adolph Demmler, probably made in 1845 during the reconstruction of the castle and bridge. However, it is difficult to find information about the lamp post. Maybe someone knows something more?. --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, halo effect around main subject. I also find the light rather dull. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 12:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good details, not a bad composition with the castle at right, and of course QI, but dull light and no "Wow" effect for me. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:St Julian church in St-Julien-de-Toursac (6).jpg edit
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:56:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light, strong distortion. Yann (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed. Light is a bit grey but in this instance I think it doesn't detract. Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like how you've worked the scene that day, but I agree with Yann about the dull lighting conditions. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI, but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light. No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, the subject/combo is not that extraordinary that compensates the lighting Poco a poco (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Passo delle Streghe - Monte Titano - San Marino - GT 05 - 2024 04 30.jpg edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 06:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#San Marino
- The witches' pass (or Passo delle Streghe) is one of the attractions of San Marino, it is a shortcut that leads from the first tower (Guaita) to the second tower (Cesta) depicted in the background. It puts everyone in great fear due to the steep slope and the overhang on the sides. In the background the fortifications near the tower are literally devoured by nature every spring, each time giving a charm of mystery to the castle located on Mount Titan. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A very nice view and I would be happy to support it. But (sorry to say this) at the branches at the left there are some odd transitions – see image note; maybe a stacking error? It would be great if you could fix this. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now. Thank you very much! – Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It would be great if you could document the amount of frames you require for a shot like this one Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are 18 stitched portrait images (6x3). I used Hugin (a free software) to merge all the images. Each image has a resolution of 24 megapixels (4000x6000), but I mainly only used the central parts of the images (2200x3300), because they offer greater guarantees of success being sharper than the edge. Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO a bit busy composition, dull light. —kallerna (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後) edit
Thu 09 May → Tue 14 May Fri 10 May → Wed 15 May Sat 11 May → Thu 16 May Sun 12 May → Fri 17 May Mon 13 May → Sat 18 May Tue 14 May → Sun 19 May
タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後) edit
Sat 04 May → Tue 14 May Sun 05 May → Wed 15 May Mon 06 May → Thu 16 May Tue 07 May → Fri 17 May Wed 08 May → Sat 18 May Thu 09 May → Sun 19 May Fri 10 May → Mon 20 May Sat 11 May → Tue 21 May Sun 12 May → Wed 22 May Mon 13 May → Thu 23 May Tue 14 May → Fri 24 May