---hoep
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (2).jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (1).jpeg
- File:Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (1).jpg
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Ja, mit mit besten Grüßen zurück,
im Umgang mit wikimediacommons bin ich wenig vertraut und einige Vorgänge erscheinen mir nicht nachvollziehbar. Beispielsweise habe ich einen Löschantrag für ein eigenes Werk gestellt und daraufhin eine Nachricht über die erfolgte Löschung erhalten. Dennoch steht unter dem Werk "Diese Datei KÖNNTE gelöscht werden." (Möglicher Weise wird dann auch eine Datei gleich mit gelöscht, die davon nicht betroffen ist, denn merkwürdiger Weise werden beide Dateien (auf Wikipedia) gleichzeitig benutzt, obwohl nur eine von beiden angegeben wurde.) Des Weiteren wurden von den commons zwei Dateien (wegen?) vorschnell zur Löschung vorgeschlagen, obschon die - anscheinend nötige - bzw. fehlende Rechtevergabe per email bereits nachgereicht wurde.
Daher möchte ich Folgendes noch einmal mitteilen, in der Hoffnung, dass es auf diese Weise verstanden wird:
1.) Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (2).jpeg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Farbquerfehler_-_Darstellung_in_der_fotografischen_Bildebene_%282%29.jpeg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Farbquerfehler_-_Darstellung_in_der_fotografischen_Bildebene_%281%29.jpeg Diese Datei bitte NICHT löschen - die Rechtevergabe wurde von mir per email bereits gesendet.
2.) Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (1).jpeg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Farbquerfehler_-_Darstellung_in_der_fotografischen_Bildebene_%281%29.jpeg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Farbquerfehler_-_Darstellung_in_der_fotografischen_Bildebene_%281%29.jpeg Diese Datei bitte NICHT löschen - die Rechtevergabe wurde von mir per email bereits gesendet.
3.) Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (1).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Farbquerfehler_-_Darstellung_in_der_fotografischen_Bildebene_%281%29.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Farbquerfehler_-_Darstellung_in_der_fotografischen_Bildebene_%281%29.jpg Diese Datei bitte löschen - der Löschantrag wurde bereits gestellt: "Löschung vorschlagen" im Menü fehlt jedoch! - bitte die Datei löschen Grund: es trat ein Fehler auf.
---hoep
- Die abfotografierten Karten sehen wie normale Straßenkarten aus dem Handel aus. Diese sind urheberrechtsgeschützt und können nicht einfach unter einer freien Lizenz hier eingestellt werden. Darum meine untigen Löschanträge. --Sitacuisses (talk) 09:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Den fotografierten Hintergrund bildet eine reproduzierte Tapete, bezüglich Rechtevergabe kenne ich mich damit nicht aus - wenn das ein Grund zur Löschung ist, war mein Ansinnen (Bildbeispiele auf Wikipedia als erläuterndes Argument) wohl vergeblich.
- Das Ansinnen ist nicht vergeblich, solange man auf bestehende Rechte achtet. Als Hintergrund könnte beispielsweise auch ein eigenes Bildmotiv oder ein selbst geschriebener und ausgedruckter Blabla-Mustertext dienen. Übrigens, zum Signieren auf Diskussionsseiten klicke bitte auf das Stiftsymbol links über dem Bearbeitungsfeld, dann geht das automatisch mit Zeitstempel. --Sitacuisses (talk) 10:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Wie ist denn nun Deiner Meinung nach die Rechslage zur Reproduktion einer Fototapete? Benötigt eine Tapete, gleich welchem Aussehens, eine Genehmigung, wenn sie im Hintergrund des Wohnzimmers des Urhebers eines Werks zu sehen ist? Und sollte diese vage Vermutung tatsächlich zutreffen, von wem - vom Tapetenhersteller oder dem primären Kartenverlag? Nicht, dass ich mich davor scheuen würde, diese einzuholen. Soweit ich das sehe, handelt es sich um kein direktes Original des Kartenherausgebers.
(PS, der sog. "Signatur und Zeitstempel" ist übrigens mit eingeschaltetem Noscript nicht sichtbar, in der Hoffnung, dass es nun den Erfordernissen entspricht -> -----hoep (talk) 11:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Signieren per Hand bzw. Tastatur geht mit der Zeichenfolge --~~~~ (zwei Bindestriche und vier Tilden). Die Karte ist bei deinen Bildern auf jeden Fall kein unwesentliches Beiwerk. Ob es sich um eine Fototapete handelt, eine Originalkarte oder eine andere Form der Reproduktion ist nicht erkennbar. Allgemein erwirbst du mit einer Fototapete das Recht, die Tapete bei dir aufzuhängen und nicht das Bildrecht am Motiv. --Sitacuisses (talk) 15:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Am 21. ds. Monats hatte ich per mail um Erlaubnis zur Verwendung des Kartenhintergrunds angefragt, bis dato aber keine Antwort erhalten, vermutlich wird auch keine mehr kommen. Da die 7 Tage bereits verstrichen sind, an deren Ende die Community normalerweise Bilder mit nicht zweifelsfreien Urheberrechten löscht, die beiden u.g. Bilder aber nach wie vor abrufbar sind, schlage ich meinerseits vor, diese nun wie vorgesehen zu löschen.---hoep (talk) 14:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (2).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Farbquerfehler - Darstellung in der fotografischen Bildebene (1).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Vivian-Maier-Bilder-Bild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
-> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vivian-Maier-Bilder-Bild.jpg -----hoep (talk) 14:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Contax II Sonnar 1zu2 5cm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 08:33, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Ich ziehe hiermit den Löschantrag für meine Datei zurück.
Die Abbildung eines gefälschten Objektivs (Quelle) könnte wohl durchaus nützlich sein.-----hoep (talk) 12:14, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
|
File:Hallen-EM 2023 Istanbul Tag 2 3000m Hanna Klein (2. v. r.).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Stepro (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Stepro, zu Obigem habe ich mich direkt auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite geäußert (wie im Formular vorgeschlagen).-----hoep (talk) 16:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hanna Klein und Konstanze Klosterhalfen 3000m 2023 European Indoor Championships.jpg
editThis media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hanna Klein und Konstanze Klosterhalfen 3000m 2023 European Indoor Championships.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Copyright status: File:Hanna Klein und Konstanze Klosterhalfen 3000m 2023 European Indoor Championships B.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Hanna Klein und Konstanze Klosterhalfen 3000m 2023 European Indoor Championships B.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Hanna Klein und Konstanze Klosterhalfen 3000m 2023 European Indoor Championships B.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)