User talk:Fredlyfish4/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Goat Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pettit Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Rendezvous Lake and South Fork Payette River.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Washington Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Hell Roaring Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Jimmy Smith Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Frog Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Fourth of July Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Toxaway Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Little Redfish Lake.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Pioneer Mountains Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 26 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Soldier Mountains Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Thompson Peak Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Mason Neck NWR.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Little City of Rocks.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:View from Lead Mountain.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Bear Pond and Lead Mountain.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Lead Mountain from south.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Magic Reservoir.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Virginia Lake Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Williams Peak Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge Boardwalk.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Smoky Dome.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Lake 3 PRWI.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Upper Lead Mountain Pond.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:South Fork Boise River.JPG was uncategorized on 16 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Bear Brook Maine.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Lucky Peak Dam Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Little City of Rocks Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Arrowhead Lake in Pioneer Mountains.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Soldier Mountains Camas County.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Stanley Lake Creek Sawtooth NRA.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:South Orenda Road.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Hell Roaring Creek Sawtooth NRA.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:South Fork Quantico Creek PRWI.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Yellow Belly Lake Sawtooth NRA.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Soldier Mountains late spring.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Lucky Peak Reservoir Idaho.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Titus Lake Sawtooth NRA.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Cabin Camp 3 PRWI.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Iron Creek Sawtooth NRA.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Sawtoooth NF 4.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Jumbo Creek Sawtooth NF.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Warm Springs Creek Sawtooth NRA.JPG was uncategorized on 5 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
New Categories!
Hi Fred, I just created Category:Salmon River (Idaho), Category:Salmon River Basin (Idaho), Category:Tributaries of the Snake River, and Category:White Cloud Mountains. -- Hämbörger (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token 395ce1f5cd5c6747faf7ad96aa948699
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Sawtooth Valley ID1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sawtooth Valley ID1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Boats in Redfish Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castle and Merriam Peaks.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sawtooth Mountains and Salmon River.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Smoky Redfish.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sawtooth mtns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warm Springs Creek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salmon River.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sawtooth from Stanley Lake Creek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sawtooths and Toxaway Lake.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Nonsense categorization
Hi Fredlyfish4, Some time ago, I have been busy getting rid of images nonsensically classified in the categories Cartography, Classification systems, Encodings, Geographic information systems and Identifiers. Simultaneously. Recently, new images have been uploaded with this categorization, some of them by you (e.g. File:Sawtooths from South 4.JPG). Can you please explain the reason of this categorization? KKoolstra (talk) 07:13, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your explanation on my talk-page. It seems that somewhere on en.wikipedia is the source of the problem. However, I haven't yet been able to find the corresponding categories there to fix the problem at the source. But I will keep trying. Thank you for cooperating in removing the erroneous cateogries. KKoolstra (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fisher Creek Trail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Laumeier Sculpture Park 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Laumeier Sculpture Park 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! New River Gorge Bridge Overlook.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mt Jackson GNP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Camas Prairie At Sunset - Idaho.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
Deleting vs Archiving
Please do not simply delete notices of DRs and other similar communications. It makes it much more difficult for your colleagues to get a complete picture of your activities on Commons. You may, of course, create one or more archive subpages as needed if the main page gets too long. Most of us use a name like User talk:Fredlyfish4/Archive 1. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- These messages are not that relevant to me because all of the files I am notified about are those that I have transferred from the English Wikipedia to the Commons via CommonsHelper. I am not the author or original uploader of any of the files and cannot provide source information on them. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 17:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think the real question is why you are transferring so many files that are obviously unsourced or even blatant copyright violations to Commons. Uploading files to Commons (whether directly or by transferring them from another project) without conducting basic checks to ensure that files that you upload meet Commons' requirements creates a lot of work for others and undermines the reliability of Commons. If you're not willing or able to perform those checks, you should probably leave the whole task of identifying files to be transferred here to others. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- While I almost always review files before I transfer them, I often make mistakes. But more significantly, some of these files are ones that I thought had proper source information but did not upon review on the Commons. I realize that my understanding of copyright laws involving images other than my own is not complete, but I am working on it. I will try to take care to deal with unsourced files on Wikipedia before transferring them. Reviewers who list them for deletion here should always notify the original uploader, who can them provide the correct source info. This is not done nearly as often as it should be. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- I think the real question is why you are transferring so many files that are obviously unsourced or even blatant copyright violations to Commons. Uploading files to Commons (whether directly or by transferring them from another project) without conducting basic checks to ensure that files that you upload meet Commons' requirements creates a lot of work for others and undermines the reliability of Commons. If you're not willing or able to perform those checks, you should probably leave the whole task of identifying files to be transferred here to others. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
Hi, Fredlyfish4. I am Dianna and I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I can't help but notice that a really large number of the files that you are transferring to the Commons should not be here, as they are not in the public domain. I suggest that you stop transferring files to the Commons for the time being, until you have a better grasp of what is and is not allowed on this wiki. Please consider reading Commons:Hirtle chart and Commons:Licensing for a better understanding of what is required before a file can be hosted on the Commons. Not only is a lot of your work for nothing, as many of your files are being deleted, but you are generating a lot of unnecessary work for administrators, both here and on the English Wikipedia. So please stop. Thanks. -- Diannaa (talk) 02:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- First, I'm not the original author or uploader of the files. Second, I'm not sure what was going through my mind when I transferred them; I'm normally more cautious. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 12:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- I am aware you are not the original uploader. You transferred the items to Commons using a bot script. Of the images I personally have checked, virtually none of them belong on the Commons, as they are incorrectly tagged as released under license or are shown as being public domain, when in actuality they are not. None of these files have adequate source information and/or level of proof of permission of the original photographer. Most will have to be deleted from both locations. Instead of transferring them to the Commons, they should have been nominated for deletion or converted to fair use, if appropriate. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) It's not quite as bad as it looks; Fredlyfish had transferred over many images, and I deleted the ones that were obviously OK, and this left mostly bad images, which is what Diannaa saw. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- I am aware you are not the original uploader. You transferred the items to Commons using a bot script. Of the images I personally have checked, virtually none of them belong on the Commons, as they are incorrectly tagged as released under license or are shown as being public domain, when in actuality they are not. None of these files have adequate source information and/or level of proof of permission of the original photographer. Most will have to be deleted from both locations. Instead of transferring them to the Commons, they should have been nominated for deletion or converted to fair use, if appropriate. -- Diannaa (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! McKittrick Canyon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guadalupe Peak from Bowl Trail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hikers Staircase.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hunter Peak.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hunter Line Shack.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manzanita Spring.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stillwater River Maine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
I use one of your videos
Hello Fredlyfish4!
I have use a video of Ovis canadensis from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directly in the follow link:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/video.php?id=7941
Also, I have used wordos of your user page in wikipedia for your contributor profile in Animalandia:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fredlyfish4
If you wish, send me a personal photo for complete your profile. I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...
This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Boris%20Loboda
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29
In the future, I use more of your animal resources, I sure!
Thank you for the licence!! Regards! Fernando Lisón
--Fernando.lison (talk) 16:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Subject/headline:
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gray treefrog amplexus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palo Duro Canyon and Capitol Peak.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cerro Castellan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Young CA meadow.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall view.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Grand Canyon snakes sign.JPG
- File:Tusayan Ruin Trail sign.JPG
- File:San Francisco Peaks sign Grand Canyon.JPG
- File:Large Kiva sign Tusayan Ruins.JPG
- File:Food for the Pueblo sign Grand Canyon.JPG
- File:Tree-ring dating sign.JPG
- File:Silver Bridge sign.JPG
- File:Phantom Ranch wildlife sign.JPG
- File:2013 High-Flow Experiment sign.JPG
- File:Bright Angel Creek sign.JPG
- File:Lure of Grand Canyon sign.JPG
- File:Black Bridge sign.JPG
- File:Bright Angel Pueblo sign.JPG
- File:Bright Angel Pueblo sign 2.JPG
- File:Dynamic Relationship sign Grand Canyon.JPG
- File:With Help from Neighbors sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Innovative accommodations sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Value for All sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Agricultural Legacies sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Protecting Your Park sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Community lifeline sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Ecological abundance sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Community connections sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Ready-made shelter sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Neighbors Near and Far sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Valuable Valley sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:A Balanced System sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Your Role in Preservation sign Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:On the Move sign Montezuma Castle.JPG
- File:Like no other Place Montezuma Well.JPG
- File:Lifeline sign Montezuma Castle.JPG
- File:Aloft but not Alone sign Montezuma Castle.JPG
- File:Cycles of care sign Montezuma Castle.JPG
- File:Timeless Beauty sign Montezuma Castle.JPG
- File:Creating a Home sign Montezuma Castle.JPG
- File:Tuzigoot Pueblo's Plaza sign.JPG
- File:Rich in Minerals sign Tuzigoot.JPG
- File:Rocks, rituals, and resources sign Tuzigoot.JPG
- File:Caring for Traces of the Past sign Tuzigoot.JPG
- File:Tuzigoot sign clues.JPG
- File:Clues in Architecture sign Tuzigoot.JPG
- File:Evolving village sign Tuzigoot.JPG
- File:People of the Verde sign Tuzigoot.JPG
- File:Box Canyon ruins sign Wupatki.JPG
- File:Sunset Crater Volcano sign in Wupatki.JPG
- File:Daily life sign Wupatki.JPG
- File:Ancient landscapes sign Wupatki.JPG
- File:Box Canyon ruins sign.JPG
- File:Dry land farming sign Wupatki.JPG
- File:Legacy of the past sign Wupatki.JPG
- File:Village and abandonment sign Wupatki.JPG
- File:The Citadel sign.JPG
- File:Farming sign in Wupatki.JPG
- File:Wupatki community sign.JPG
- File:Nalakihu sign.JPG
- File:Wupatki blowhole sign.JPG
- File:Wupatki ballcourt sign.JPG
- File:Wupatki map.JPG
- File:Wupatki sign 3.JPG
- File:Wupatki sign 2.JPG
- File:Wupatki sign 1.JPG
- File:Wukoki sign 2.JPG
- File:Lomaki sign.JPG
- File:Wukoki sign.JPG
- File:Walnut Canyon sign 5.JPG
- File:Walnut Canyon sign 4.JPG
- File:Walnut Canyon sign 3.JPG
- File:Pinus ponderosa sign.JPG
- File:Purshia stansburiana sign.JPG
- File:Yucca baccata sign.JPG
- File:Cercocarpus montanus sign.JPG
- File:Walnut Canyon sign 2.JPG
- File:Walnut Canyon sign 1.JPG
- File:Volcanic Terrain sign.JPG
- File:Sunset Crater sign 2.JPG
- File:San Francisco Peak sign.JPG
- File:Sunset Crater sign.JPG
- File:Painted Desert sign on Doney Crater.JPG
- File:Doney Crater view sign.JPG
- File:Doney Crater prehistoric farm sign.JPG
- File:Ben Doney sign.JPG
- File:Doney Crater summer homes sign.JPG
- File:Doney Crater sign.JPG
- File:Doney Craters Trail sign.JPG
- File:Big Bend Camp Life sign.JPG
- File:Big Bend Wilderness without boundaries sign.JPG
- File:Big Bend Living in Limestone sign.JPG
- File:Big Bend Partners in Protection sign.JPG
- File:Big Bend Shared Resources sign.JPG
- File:Sotol Vista sign.JPG
- File:Homer Wilson Ranch sign.JPG
- File:Big Bend Cotton Boom sign.JPG
- File:Carro Castellan sign.JPG
- File:Mule Ears Spring Trail sign.JPG
- File:Big Bend Land of Distances sign.JPG
- File:Henbury Meteorite pieces.JPG
- File:Chinga meteorite piece.JPG
- File:Sikhote-Alin Meteorite.JPG
- File:Canyon Diablo meteorite pieces.JPG
- File:Dugout Wells sign.JPG
- File:Animal highways sign Big Bend.JPG
- File:Santa Elena Canyon sign.JPG
- File:River Running sign in Big Bend.JPG
- File:Tuff Canyon sign 2.JPG
- File:Tuff Canyon Sign.JPG
- File:Boquillas Crossing Sign.JPG
- File:Mount Antero sign.JPG
- File:Denver, South Park & Pacific RR sign.JPG
- File:Agnes Vaille Falls sign.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 21.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 20.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 19.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 18.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 17.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 16.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 15.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 14.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 13.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 11.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 12.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 10.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 9.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 8.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 7.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 6.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 5.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 4.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 3.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 1.JPG
- File:Florissant Fossil Beds sign 2.JPG
Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 21:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
please delete this picture, it's of me and i can't figure out how to delete it
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zack_Shah_in_2010.jpg
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Fredlyfish4,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! University of Mississippi Field Station 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caprock Canyons 2014 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gypsum layers Caprock Canyons 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Interstate 20 at Vicksburg and Mississippi River.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trillium Great Smoky Mountains.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sceloporus undulatus in Guadalupe Mountains National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puskus Lake 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guadalupe Mountains March 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! White Mountains2010-08-20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wells Fargo Building Lubbock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sublett farm house 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Structure of file page
You may want to weigh in at Commons:Help desk#Structure of file page, since we obviously disagree. - Jmabel ! talk 17:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I generally only move licenses from the infobox if something looks out of place. I'm not sure why I changed your file pages, but I remember having qualms about it. Sorry for any issues. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lepomis megalotis UMFS 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rosa palustris flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vanessa virginiensis UMFS 2015 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Celithemis elisa female 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
User:Fredlyfish4 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Centrosema virginianum flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krigia dandelion UMFS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Erigeron philadelphicus UMFS 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Claytonia virginica UMFS 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hexagenia limbata nymph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rosa multiflora flower UMFS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hyla chrysoscelis UMFS 2016 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
WSA's?
Are they all on BLM land now? None on Forest Service or other federal lands?
I noticed you added "BLM areas" as a master category for cat: WSAs. Hence the question. TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Tillman: I actually forgot the Forest Service has any. They're still there, just less prominent that the BLM, I think. I removed the category, though I think all the photos in the category so far are of BLM sites. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 23:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Texas Madrone in Guadalupe Mountains.JPG
Hi. I am planning to use your photo of the madroño "strawberries" to illustrate the appendix on Mexican trees in the book I am writing.
It is a guidebook to Mexico City for personal and family use which began as a grad school assignment.
It is not for publication since I don't own its illustrations.
Cheers, Varlaam (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Automeris io UMFS 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Important message for file movers
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)