Frolzart

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Frolzart!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Пожалуйста категоризуйте файлы

---

When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

— С уважением, Донор (✉) 09:35, 9 октября 2016 (UTC).

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Пожалуйста, категоризируйте загружаеиые изображения правильно

Добрый день. Пожалуйста, загружайте ваши изображения правильно. Правильно означает, что для каждого файла (серии файлов, посвященных одному событию) должна быть выбрана категория или несколько категорий, которые позволяют быстро найти файл, соответствующий содержанию изображения.

Типичным (и к сожалению неправильным) для вас является загрузка большого количества файлов в корневую категорию. Например, вы загрузили серию файлов, посвящённых Международному фестивалю искусств в Сочи, выбрав для него несуществующую категорию Фестивали. Робот изменил это название на англоязычное Festivals, что правильнее, но не совсем, т.к. невозможно все в мире фестивали, проходящие в различных странах и во множестве городов в различные годы свалить в одну категорию. Пользоваться такой категорией невозможно. это была бы свалка. Поэтому все фестивали делятся на различные подкатегории, в т.ч. и по странам, а внутри стран по местам проведения и т.д. Поэтому другим участникам приходится подчищать за вами, размещая серии ваших файлов в различные подкатегории. См., например, ваши файлы, посвящённые Всемирным зимним военным играм, международному зимнему фестивалю искусств, фестивалю цветов в Сочи, фестивалю татуировки, чемпионату юга России по бодибилдингу и др. Например, вы загрузили множество хороших фоток, посвященных фестивалю цветов в Сочи, выбрав для них категорию Festivals. Но там огромное количество файлов из разных стран, что они там растворятся и кроме того, они замусоривают основную категорию. Я создал для серии ваших фоток специальную подкатегорию Sochi Flower Fest 2017, которая была затем помещена в категории Festivals in Sochi; Flowers in Sochi; Events in Sochi; 2017 in Sochi, что позволяют выйти на ваши файлы независимо через четыре разные категории. Поэтому, пожалуйста, размещайте ваши фотографии ближе по смыслу в существующие категории, которые отражают содержание фото. Такую работу предстоит сделать с файлами, посвященными Кубку конфедераций в Сочи, Ночной хоккейной лиге, и др., еще неоткатегоризированным. В целом, у вас хорошие фотографии и спасибо вам за то, что вы находите время загружать их на Викисклад. Только не забывайте правильно категоризировать и давать правильное описание для каждого файла. Если у вас будут вопросы, буду рад на них ответить. Удачи и новых фоток!--KSK (talk) 22:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@KSK Зравствуйте! Спасибо за конструктивные замечания. Я уже как-то в обсуждениях писал, что для меня алгоритм данного ресурса – дремучий лес. Мой товарищ, весьма продвинутый программист, с большим стажем, кстати говоря, и солидным опытом, когда я к нему обратился за консультацией как разобраться в «мироустройстве» Викиновостей, мало того, что ничем не смог помочь, но и сам весьма напрягся…. Посему, если уж что-то вас не устраивает, то было бы продуктивнее, если бы вы дали конкретную инструкцию, как выбирать категории для изображений и прочее…. То, что я получил из вашего месседжа, лично для меня никакой ясности не внесло. Вы оперируете своей специфической терминологией, понятной только особому кругу вам подобных. Я к этой общности людей ни коем образом не принадлежу. Ваше пространное послание я прочитал, но каким способом мне «размещать …. фотографии ближе по смыслу в существующие категории, которые отражают содержание фото» и как «правильно категоризировать и давать правильное описание для каждого файла» так и не понял…. Считайте это моими вопросами, на которые я хотел бы получить конкретные ответы. Честно говоря, я реально задолбался подготавливать материал для данного ресурса, нигде такого гемора я ранее не встречал. Исключительно из-за стремления преодолеть, не спасовать перед преградой я всё-таки бьюсь об эту стену…. Но силы мои уже на исходе, честно говоря…. (Frolzart (talk) 23:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC))(обсуждение)

• Конкретно о том как устроен Commons можно прочитать здесь: Commons:Добро пожаловать. А вот как конкретно категоризировал ваши файлы, которые вы загрузили под общим именем Парк Кубка Конфедераций в Сочи, опытный участник Братеевский: Вначале он поместил их в отдельную категорию Confederations Cup Park in Sochi (т.к их достаточно много и они посвящены одному событию), которую в свою очередь поместил ещё в 5 различных категорий. Таким образом, ваши файлы попали в категорию Кубок конфедераций 2017года; События 2017 года в Сочи, События мая 2017 года в России, т.к. по своему содержанию имеют прямое и непосредственное отношение ко всем эти событиям. Т.к проект Викисклад международный все названия и желательно описания делать на английском. Не отчаивайтесь, всё не так уж и сложно. Всё приходит с опытом. С наилучшими пожеланиями.--KSK (talk) 06:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

@KSK Уважаемый, KSK! Конечно же, я ознакомился с «Commons:Добро пожаловать», но ещё раз повторюсь, впервые сталкиваюсь с ресурсом, столь своеобразно устроенным. Разбираться в нём пытался, но моя основная миссия, как фотожурналиста - подготовка фото и текста. Сотрудничая с иными интернет-изданиями, я обычно отправляю им фотографии одним архивом и отдельным файлом - текст. В каком виде они всё это разместят – это уже их прерогатива, на то и существуют редакторы…. Я журналист и фотограф, а не складской работник, чтобы ломать голову, куда и как складировать материал. Пусть, как вы пишете, более «опытные участники» этим занимаются. Кстати, и визуально как всё выглядит, мне много, чего не нравится, но так как не я придумывал «правила игры» и мне не делегировано право размещать материал на свой собственный вкус, то я на эту тему и не заморачиваюсь. Поэтому без обиняков ставлю вас в известность, что не буду я заниматься всей этой складской логистикой, я с пониманием отношусь к вашей заботе о соответствии категорий и прочего, но моя первоочередная задача – отправить материал для публикации. Я делаю это абсолютно бескорыстно, а посему имею полное право пользоваться теми схемами, которые мне более удобны. Повторюсь в тысячный раз, на данном ресурсе размещать материал, мягко говоря, дело весьма хлопотное. Если вас моя позиция не устраивает, то тогда мне нет смысла сотрудничать с «Викиновостями» (Frolzart (обсуждение) 10:39, 9 May 2017 (UTC)).

@Frolzart

Добрый день, Александр!

Спасибо Вам за новую серию фотографий о Сочи. Это здорово, что вы делитесь этими фото. Поэтому не буду повторять вам о необходимости правильно атрибутировать файлы (выбор категории, правильное описание и т.д.). Ладно, я это пытаюсь делать за вас. Однако, что заставило меня снова написать вам после того, как прочел о ваших "мучениях" при загрузке фотографий по джазовому фестивалю. Мне кажется, что вы не совсем правильно оцениваете ситуацию. Поэтому позволю себе объясниться. Вы и я (а также миллионы людей во сем мире) находимся на "ресурсе", который устроен особым образом. Викиновости - это часть т.н. вами "ресурса". Фото грузятся на Викисклад, откуда они попадают и в Викиновости и в Википедию (в статьи) и др. места, причем на разных языках. Здесь нет штатных редакторов. Здесь все волонтеры, и все работают бескорыстно. И те люди, кто корректирует написанные вами новости Сочи и те, кто редактирует описание и категории загруженных вами фотографий. Если Вам что-то не нравится, то это можно изменить по вашей инициативе, используя принятые процедуры: форумы, обсуждения и корректировка. Все в ваших руках. Но только обязателен принцип консенсуса, т.е. подавляющего большинства на предложенные изменения. А теперь конкретно. Предлагаю вам помощь по загрузке файлов. Файл объемом 200-300 КБ грузится за секунды. Фото можно грузить пачками хоть по сколько штук, не набирая каждый раз атрибуты загружаемого файла (категорию и описание). Для этого на Викискладе (Commons) используется Upload Wizard. Если хотите, можете мне частным образом написать на Википочту: на моей странице для это достаточно кликнуть мышкой. Я живу в Сочи и, если захотите, можно будет обменяться телефонами, чтобы оперативно разрешать любые вопросы. С уважением --KSK (talk) 10:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

@KSK Приветствую, KSK! Благодарю за предложенную помощь, если возникнет необходимость, то буду иметь в виду… По поводу редакторов, волонтёров и прочего я в курсе, сам работаю бескорыстно… И на консенсус я естественно настроен и не собираюсь ни с кем здесь воевать, просто своеобразное устройство данного ресурса, лично для меня, не столь прозрачно и комфортно. Подстраиваюсь, как могу… Фото я загружаю именно с помощью Upload Wizard, и в 99% случаев «пачками» не получается: постоянно загрузки зависают, одним словом, процесс этот геморный и занимает массу времени, которое можно было бы потратить с большей пользой… Раз уж вы живёте, как и я в Сочи, то телефон свой я вам отправлю на вашу Википочту…

С уважением --(Frolzart (обсуждение) 12:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC))

A kitten for you!

nice

Ramiiiiiiiii 08:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramiiiiiiiii (talk • contribs) 08:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Rdsgp2018 21.jpg

File:Rdsgp2018 21.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

And also:

• File:Rdsgp2018 20.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 19.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 18.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 17.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 16.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 14.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 13.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 15.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 11.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 12.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 10.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 09.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 07.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 08.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 05.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 04.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 06.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 02.jpg
• File:Rdsgp2018 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Rdsgp2018 03.jpg

File:Rdsgp2018 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Художники городу Сочи 14.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Художники городу Сочи 14.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Художники городу Сочи 14.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:Художники городу Сочи 15.jpg
• File:Художники городу Сочи 13.jpg
• File:Художники городу Сочи 12.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Образы театральной реальности 16.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Образы театральной реальности 16.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Образы театральной реальности 17.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Образы театральной реальности 17.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Образы театральной реальности 15.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Образы театральной реальности 15.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Светлана Новострои, разруха, вандализм, заборы, островки истории 12.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Светлана Новострои, разруха, вандализм, заборы, островки истории 12.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:28, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Найк Борзов прес-центре Сочи 05.jpg

File:Найк Борзов прес-центре Сочи 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.208.115.220 08:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Пресс-тур по арене "Фишт" 06.jpg

File:Пресс-тур по арене "Фишт" 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Петербургский диалог 2019 в Сочи 13.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Петербургский диалог 2019 в Сочи 13.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

VLu (talk) 22:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Заж 06.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Парк Кубка Конфедераций в Сочи 14.jpg

File:Парк Кубка Конфедераций в Сочи 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fma12 (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)