G CHP

Welcome to the Commons, G CHP!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Filnik 20:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nemausus.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Nemausus.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Cecil (talk) 19:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Plan abbaye du Val des choux.pdf

Image deletion warning

Image:Plan abbaye du Val des choux.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--WayneRay (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Château de Talant Côte-d'Or.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello G CHP!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 16:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Plan abbaye du Val des choux.pdf is uncategorized since 26 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 16:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Page France

Bonjour,

J'ai constaté que tu contribuais à améliorer la page France. Le découpage par thème est une copie de la page de la Pologne (Poland) que j'ai reprise telle que pour aller plus vite : c'est donc améliorable. Faute de temps je n'ai que partiellement couvert les régions (Par ailleurs, Paris est surreprésentée car il existe une page dédiée). Pour trouver des photos de qualité j'ai écumé toutes les sélections (images de qualité, images remarquables) sur Commons mais également dans les Wikipédia allemand (qui a des choix originaux), anglais, polonais et espagnol puis j'ai commencé à regarder les portails mais je n'ai traité jusqu'à présent que les portails régionaux et départementaux Corse, Midi Pyrenées, Aquitaine et Bretagne. La partie historique et personnalités est pleine de trous (et donne dans l'image d'Epinal faute d'illustrations disponibles) . Cette synthèse m'a permis de constater que la couverture photographique de qualité de la France était souvent bien faible.--Pline (talk) 12:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

J'ai commencé la page ce week-end (il n'y avait que les cartes auparavant) ce qui explique le côté brouillon. Malheureusement pour la sélection des photos, il n'y a souvent pas un choix énorme : tout ce qui ne relève pas du site touristique renommé est mal sinon pas photographié ce qui donne une image déformée, passéiste de la France. La législation française qui interdit de charger dans Commons toute photo de bâtiment ou de sculpture ayant moins de nn ans ce qui exclut par exemple un bâtiment comme le Trocadéro, n'améliore rien. Le message de Commons à la mise à jour est purement informatif; mais il vaut mieux tout de même limiter la longueur des commentaires sous les photos et à terme il faudra stabiliser le nombre de photos présentes dans la page. En tout cas, même si je ne suis pas propriétaire de la page, ta participation est la bienvenue.--Pline (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Catégorisation dans Wikipédia

Bonjour, j'ai remarqué récemment que tu faisais un effort pour catégoriser certaines images existantes, en ajoutant notamment certaines catégories à celles déjà existantes. Malheureusement, les règles de commons préconisent d'utiliser systématiquement la catégorie la plus précise d'une hiérarchie. Par exemple, si une image du palais des ducs est déjà catégorisée dans 'palais des ducs de Dijon', il ne faut pas lui adjoindre une catégorie supplémentaire Dijon car cela contribue à alourdir la catégorie mère (voir les préconisations sur les catégories). Par contre, au contraire, rien n'empêche de mettre une sélection des plus belles photos sur la page "Dijon". C'est pour cette raison de cette préconisation que j'ai annulé certaines de tes modifications récentes. Bonne fin de journée. Christophe.Finot (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

File:FirenzePonteVecchio.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:40, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

A propos de la carte Byzantine-Arab_naval_struggle-fr.svg

Bonjour !

Beaucoup de cartes contradictoires circulent à propos de l'Empire byzantin, à cause des divers POVs divergents : d'origine grecque, elles minimisent l'emprise des Slaves dans les Balkans et des Turcs en Anatolie ; d'origine slave ou turque, elles augmentent au contraire cette emprise, tant dans l'espace que dans le temps.

Voyant votre carte, je me suis demandé pourquoi la Grèce figurait hors de l'Empire, et j'ai supposé que c'est parce qu'une source quelconque, probablement reprenant le POV de l'historiographie des pays slaves des Balkans, considère que les territoires peuplés par des Slaves dans cette période, n'appartenaient plus à l'empire. Mais les Slaves ont diffusé dans tout le Péloponnèse et ont également débarqué nombreux dans les îles Ioniennes, en Crète et en Asie Mineure. Même si son autorité a vacillé quelques années dans l'ensemble des territoires où sont venus les Slaves, tous les historiens byzantinologues ni-grecs ni-slaves, tels Charles Diehl, Georg Ostrogorski ou Jean-Pierre Sodini, sont unanimes pour dire que l'Empire a conservé ou rapidement repris le contrôle territorial au nord d'une ligne que je vous trace en orange sur la carte jointe, conservant notamment le Péloponnèse, le centre de la Grèce, Andrinople, les bouches du Danube et celles du Tyras (actuel Dniestr - port-cité de Mavrokastron); il a intégré en tant que fédérés les Slaves installés au sud de cette ligne, qui n'y étaient pas majoritaires par rapport aux Grecs et qui ont d'ailleurs été hellénisés.

Cordialement, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 14:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Pièce jointe: File:Byzantine-Arab naval struggle-fr.jpg

File:Nîmes Immeuble Le Colisée.jpg

File:Nîmes Immeuble Le Colisée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nemoi a parlé le 12:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Annecy Thiou5.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Annecy Thiou5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 09:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Nécessaire fait : licence ajoutée G CHP (talk) 08:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 15:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Chemin de fer de Provence-PN entre Mézel et Digne.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Chemin de fer de Provence-PN entre Mézel et Digne.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Eglise Sainte Madelaine de Besançon2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for drawing my attention to this - sorry.)

Copyright status: File:Palais de Justice2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Palais de Justice2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 00:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

fait

Danke. --G CHP (talk) 08:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Orgue de l'église Sainte-Madeleine de Besançon2.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Orgue de l'église Sainte-Madeleine de Besançon2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, das ist  Done Avec mes excuses. Danke.--G CHP (talk) 09:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/G CHP⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear G CHP,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Statue bonaparte.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Statue bonaparte.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:13, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Karte Haus Burgund 4 FR.png

File:Karte Haus Burgund 4 FR.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

1Loupdesbois (talk) 15:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Karte Haus Burgund 4 FR.png

File:Karte Haus Burgund 4 FR.png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of File:Karte-Haus-Burgund 4-FR.png. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Achim (talk) 16:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Karte Haus Burgund 4 FR.png

J'ai établi cette carte en 2010 (mise en ligne le 17/05/2010) en traduisant en français les éléments produits par la carte de Marco Zanoli (sidonius (d), alors que sa traduction en français n'existait pas encore. Puis, 4 ans plus tard, en 2014, Marco Zanoli a fait lui-même une traduction en langue française de sa carte. Elle est donc plus récente.

Pas d'objection pour la suppression de cette carte. G CHP (talk) 16:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)