Kacamata

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kacamata!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 23:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Nossa Senhora dos Remedios.jpg

File:Nossa Senhora dos Remedios.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 10:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Old PiriPiri.jpg

File:Old PiriPiri.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Krdbot 10:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg

And also:

• File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg
• File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Following your message Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) is not suitable for Commons since commercial use must be permitted. The valid licenses are listed at COM:L. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Read COM:L.

Patrick Rogel So the only "wrong" thing is the commercial use not being permitted?--SirEdimon (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes indeeed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Patrick Rogel Oh, I see. What a pity. These images would be very useful. Thank you for your help and for you response.--SirEdimon (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted content

---

Hello Kacamata, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster (new angle).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

• File:Jair Bolsonaro overflights the Brumadinho dam disaster.jpg
• File:Brumadinho dam disaster area on January 26, 2019.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^💬 04:32, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Michael Gielen.jpg

File:Michael Gielen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Patrick Rogel My bad. I just saw the image on Flickr and as it was licensed as "some rights reserved" I thought I could use it here. I'm sorry for this mistake. You can nominate it for speedy deletion if you can or wish. Please accept my apologies.--SirEdimon (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Uwe Gensheimer at the 2019 World Men's Handball Championship.jpg

Hi SirEdimon, the Flickr-uploader/author of this image is on our "bad author" list, whereby we cannot accept uploads from them. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Cropping images

Hi, I noticed that you have cropped several images, presumably to remove a logo. There may be legal implications in doing this, see Commons:Watermarks#Legal issues with the removal of watermarks. This is not an official Commons policy or guideline and I'm not telling you to not do it, but you should be aware of the legal issues.

I also notice that the file size of your cropped images is much smaller than the originals, indicating that the image is more compressed and has probably lost some image quality. I recommend using Commons:CropTool. Rather than cropping, it is often better to paint out unwanted elements of an image using an image editor, retaining the original composition. I do this using Microsoft Paint to copy a neighbouring area of the image, as in File:Brynford Village Green - geograph.org.uk - 33781.jpg. Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Martin Filler DM.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Filler DM.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Martin Filler DM.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, Secondarywaltz. This image was uploaded on en.WP, it's there for over 7 years and it was suggested by a bot to transfer it to Commons. If this is a COPYVIO, it's a serious COPYVIO on en.WP (where the image is being used for several years). If this is a COPYVIO just tell me and I'll nominate the image at en.WP for deletion too. Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Secondarywaltz: Note attached to the upload states "Image copyright © Duane Michals" and there is no permission from the author. Secondarywaltz (talk)

{{reply to|Yes, I noted it, but I assumed that it was "impossible" to an image to remain for over 7 years on Wikipedia violating copyright without anyone (admins/experienced editors) to notice it. Perhaps, I was a little bit "naive". I have no means to contact the image's author and the editor, who originally uploaded it on en.WP, is inactive for almost 6 years now. I guess the only solution is to delete it. I'm sorry for this mistake. I'll nominate the original image for deletion. Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 04:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello!

I saw that you created a deletion request for an inappropriate user page. A promotional/inappropriate user page is a criteria for speedy deletion under CSD U3, so {{SD|U3}} would've been enough. Just so you know :).Jonteemil (talk) 23:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Jonteemil. I know this, but I didn't know how to nominate it to speedy deletion. Hahaha. Then, I did think that it would be better to nominate it for deletion than just let it be. Do you know a easy way to nominate pages to speedy deletion? I know how to nominate pages for speedy deletion for copyvio, but not for other reasons. Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 23:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Other than editing the page and entering {{SD|U3}} you can do it with Help:QuickDelete if you have that gadget activated.Jonteemil (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Olá!

Olá SirEdimon! Vi a sua solicitação de exclusão da foto Recomeçar (Acústico), concordo com você que o artigo todo deva ser deletado (me equivoquei e não havia percebido os pontos que você colocou na abertura do pedido), eu gostaria saber como posso provar (ou licenciar) artes que detenho os direitos totais, isso pensando em evitar futuros problemas aqui na Wikipedia. Como devo proceder? Quero contribuir da melhor forma aqui no site em futuros artigos. Muito obrigado pela ajuda! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miyaggi (talk • contribs) 08:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Olá, Miyaggi. Primeiro, só para diferenciar. Aqui é o WikiCommons e não a Wikipédia. Ambos são projetos irmãos, mas não são a mesma coisa. Agora respondendo a sua pergunta. Se você produziu o trabalho e detêm os direitos autorais sobre o mesmo(seja um foto, imagem, etc.), geralmente basta carregar o trabalho aqui usando a marcação "own work" ("trabalho próprio"). Se você tem autorização do detentor do direito autoral, mas você próprio não é o dententor dos direitos, basta seguir os procedimentos mostrados em Commons:OTRS. Se você não é o autor, mas detêm os direitos de um trabalho, as mesmas políticas descritas em Commons:OTRS devem ser seguidas. Se você "achou" a imagem na internet (em lugares como o "Flickr", por exemplo), você deve ver a licença do trabalho e ver se ele compatível com as licenças aceitas aqui no Commons. Esse artigo pode te ajudar nisso: Commons:Licenciamento. Quanto a capa de discos, livros, cartazes de filmes, etc., a melhor opção é carregar na própria Wikipédia (e não no Commons) utilizando o chamado "fair use". Na Wikipédia em Português, para carregar cartazes e capas você deve seguir as políticas mostradas em pt:WP:URC. Como já lhe disse, qualquer dúvida que tiver basta perguntar. Editores bem intencionados são sempre bem vindos aqui e em todos os projetos da Wikimedia.--SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 19:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Érico (talk) 01:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Obrigado, Érico.--SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 04:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EmmaCoolen (talk) 12:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Lou Boudreau statue.jpg

File:Lou Boudreau statue.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: No FOP per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in :Category:Statue of Lou Boudreau, Cleveland) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : EurekaLott.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 23:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Caesar DePaco

Hi there, I saw that you opened a speedy deletion for the File:Caesar DePaço 2020.jpg. If you click on the source of the image, you'll find it has a caption reading:
"THIS FILE IS LICENSED UNDER THE CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 2.0 GENERIC LICENSE."
I request that you retract your request. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--A1Cafel (talk) 10:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi A1Cafel. I'm sorry the delay to reply. I'll try it next time I upload a image via Flickr. Thanks.--Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 18:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

A1Cafel For the first time, I uploaded images using Flickr2Commons (or, at least, I guess I did) and the uploads were not cleared by FlickreviewR 2 and have several hidden categories/issues that must be addressed. Could you please review the last seven images I have uploaded and tell what I did wrong? So, I can avoid doing the same mistakes again. Regards.--Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

First of all, you didn't use the F2C tool. There is a link at the first message that I delivered to you, just try again. Second, you several files uploaded recently are licensed under COM:PDM, this tag has been allowed since 2020, so no worry for this. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

A1Cafel So, I have to upload directly using the tool on the link? If so, I'll try again.--Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 02:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

You can simply type "COM:F2C" to directly go to the above link. Happy editing. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Anton Brehme.jpg

Hi, just saw you deleted my uploaded file Anton Brehme.jpg. Actually, this file is public domain, as stated here https://www.berlin-recycling-volleys.de/media-2/medienservice. Additionally, I talked to the PR office of the volleyball club and they said I can use their pictures for Wikipedia. Could you undo the deletion? Best, Beat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatboxxx49 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Beatboxxx49. First of all, don't forget to always sign your messages. Second, you misunderstood it. I didn't delete the file, I just nominated it for deletion and an administrator did it. If you think the file was improperly deleted, you can open an "undeletion request" here. Regards, --Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 09:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Dúvida e agradecimento

Olá, Kacamata. Muito obrigado por colocar a imagem do vice-governador para a correta eliminação, eu pensei que TODAS as imagens que estivessem no YouTube concordavam com aquela licença. Para não cometer erros como esse eu queria tirar uma dúvida, esse vídeo aqui corresponde com a licença?[1]--Daniel Benny Pinheiro (talk) 01:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Olá Daniel Benny Pinheiro. Sim, esse vídeo foi carregado sob uma licença CC BY. Portanto, pode ser carregado aqui no Commons.--Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 03:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Fotografia página Madalena Fontoura

Olá Kacamata, a página de wikipédia que criei ontem foi eliminada devido a problemas com os direitos de autor de uma imagem que utilizei. Nesse sentido e com efeito, substituí para uma nova imagem que já não possui qualquer violação de direitos autorais. ainda é possível restaurar a página? Com os melhores cumprimentos. Miguellima12345 (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Olá, Miguellima12345. Primeiro você tem que me dizer se está falando sobre o artigo na Wikipédia ou sobre a imagem aqui no Commons. São duas coisas diferentes. Assim que esclarecermos isso, eu posso dar uma olhada e eventualmente te ajudar.--Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 00:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Estou a falar do artigo Wikipédia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miguellima12345 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Deleção da imagem File:Mateus Simões Out 2022.jpg

Saudações, Kakamata! O Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE) disponibiliza um gigantesco banco de dados abertos, que incluem as fotografias dos candidatos, sob licença 4.0, veja esse link aqui.

Ocorre que, infelizmente, o TSE não coloca o ícone com a licença em todas as suas páginas onde disponibiliza a foto. No endereço que lhe passei agora, as fotos ficam reunidas em um pastas e arquivo extensos, o que dificulta sua manipulação e não oferecem um link diretamente para o foto, como ocorre na página "Dvulgando contas", para onde essa fotografia direciona. Pensei que estava facilitando a checagem, mas foi o contrário.

A foto acima do candidato Mateus Simões, eleição de 2022, é possivel baixar pelo endereço https://dadosabertos.tse.jus.br/dataset/candidatos-2022 (tem o ícone da licença), em seguidana pasta zipada https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/eleicoes/eleicoes2022/fotos/foto_cand2022_MG_div.zip. O arquivo da imagem nesta pasta é FMG130001701691_div.jpg, conforme numeração final da página de divulgação de contasdo candidato Mateus Simões: https://divulgacandcontas.tse.jus.br/divulga/#/candidato/2022/2040602022/MG/130001701691.

Entretanto, não posso baixar novamente com o endereço correto - que possui o ícone da licença, pensei até em alterar o arquivo existente, mas necessito da sua opinião. Esse links me dão a convicção que a licença é mesmo 4.0, ainda que não conste em todas as páginas do TSE onde a foto foi gravada. Ajmcbarreto (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Deleção da imagem File:O Sul, Nacional e os Livros.png

Ola Kacamata, eu arrumei o conteudo da imagem File:O Sul, Nacional e os Livros.png como voce pediu, se quiser dar uma confirmada se esta ok e remover a tag, agradeceria. Ldisconzi (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Olá, @Ldisconzi. Retirei a marcação. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 00:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

a heads up

I noticed you place a lot of {{No source since}} tags on images where the uploader stated "own work". I noticed you doing so on images where I thought the "own work" claims were credible. I am concerned that a {{No source since}} tag is not the right way to challenge the uploads of individuals you suspect of sockpuppetry, or other bad faith activity, and I raised this issue at Commons:Village_pump/Technical Geo Swan (talk) 05:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

• I made a brief review of your contribution history. It seems you have left thousands of notes on user talk pages informing newbies that you had tagged images they uploaded for speedy deletion due to no source.

However, the couple of dozen you tagged recently, which haven't yet been deleted, included quite a few images where either:

1. the image probably did merit a deletion discussion, but for copyright violation, or not being in scope;
2. I saw zero reason to doubt that the image was an "own image" as the newbie uploader claimed.

I think good faith newbies are best served when the deletion justification in the deletion log clearly specifies what was actually wrong with the image. If the real problem was copyright, or scope, that is what the deletion log should say, because we want people to learn from their mistakes.

So far as I know good faith newbies are allowed to upload images they took themselves.

I am afraid that your assertion their good faith own images lacked a valid source not only resulted in hundreds of valid images being unnecessarily deleted, but it would have had a chilling effect on the enthusiasm of those promising newbies.

If you choose to continue to nominate images for deletion I really hope you will be more careful. Thanks. Geo Swan (talk) 20:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

@Geo Swan Stop sending messages. I don't want and don't need a "heads up" from someone like you. I know what kind of behavior you have and why you are banned from en.WP. Again, STOP sending messages. Someone like you have nothing to teach me. Bye. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 20:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasonal Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Kacamata, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Obrigado, @RodRabelo7. Feliz natal para você também!!! Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Hello

Next time consider using Smart rollback. Just one click and everything’s rollback’d. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Falta de fonte na foto

Os dados na página https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Ministra_Maria_Claudia_Bucchianeri.jpg foram devidamente colocados. Eu retiro o aviso ou sempre preciso esperar quem colocou? Obrigado. CaioGerrraPt (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Olá, @CaioGerrraPt. O aviso já foi retirado por um revisor. Att, Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 23:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Mas por que dentro da Wikipedia, antes de entrar na Wikimedia, ainda aparece o aviso que você colocou? Isso também continua ocorrendo quando se navega pelo celular mesmo eu já tendo limpado os cookies bem como acessado por outro computador. O aviso voltou a ser mostrado hoje pela manhã. CaioGerrraPt (talk) 13:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)