Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Miss Mattërn!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ritratti edit

Ciao, grazie infinite per la segnalazione! Non me ne sono resa conto! Provvederò subito a cambiare i nomi (non penso si possa fare apposta). Ho controllato su Wikipedia, sono indicate col cognome GONZAGA, non d'Este, furono Gonzaga, il padre era un Gonzaga, la madre era una Este, quindi non le posso chiamare in modo errato. Il padre fu Ferrante III GONZAGA, a sua volta suo padre fu Cesare II Gonzaga, Ferrante II Gonzaga, e si arriva a Cesare I Gonzaga. Il ducato di Guastalla fu governato dai Gonzaga di Guastalla, perciò non sono io a sbagliare il cognome. ~User:MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, bjh21 (talk) 01:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

portrait of the belgian austrian feldmarschall edit

hi Miss Mattërn,

thanks for message. I understand about the frame (easy to remove), but I don´t see the halo you are speaking about... --Jebulon (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please experiment in the sandbox edit

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  Frysk  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−
  
An edit you made seemed to be a test, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Feel free to visit the community portal if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thank you!

This is about your edits of Category:Equestrian portraits of Victor Emmanuel II of Italy. --JopkeB (talk) 11:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


Please do not overwrite files edit

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


 
I noticed that you uploaded a file using the same name as another file, which already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

DrKay (talk) 06:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Portrait of H.M. King George VI in Garter Robes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

DrKay (talk) 06:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:General Sir Douglas Dawson.jpg edit

 
File:General Sir Douglas Dawson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKay (talk) 06:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Portrait of John Francis Ashley.jpg edit

 
File:Portrait of John Francis Ashley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKay (talk) 07:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Portrait of William Lygon, 7th Earl Beauchamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKay (talk) 07:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Angus Douglas Hamilton, 15th Duke of Hamilton.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Artist is still alive. Obvious copyright notice at source.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

DrKay (talk) 07:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Portrait of Henry (1900–1974), Duke of Gloucester.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Clearly copyrighted to the artist's estate at the source page. Nothing to do with the UK government. Artist died in 1975, so work is copyrighted in country of origin until 2051.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

DrKay (talk) 07:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Portrait of H.M. King George V edit

Hi @Miss Mattërn. I found your upload, "File:Portrait of H.M. King George V (1911).jpg".

I believe you copied the description from File:King George V 1911.jpg. Your version has, by accident, my name. That is no problem. It has since been corrected by @DrKay.

My question is: Why did you upload this version? It looks more saturated, blurry, and lower resolution. The file "File:King George V 1911.jpg" is scanned from the original painting in the Royal Collection, and is not blurry.

GettyImages says this modified copy is from "The Lady's Newspaper, 1935". Are you planning to use this specific version on Wikipedia, perhaps? I am curious to learn what the purpose is for this particular modification. Thank you! Krinkle (talk) 19:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, mr. Krinkle
I took the liberty of uploading that version, because in my opinion I found this version very well colored compared to that of the official version. if you would like to report any copyright problem but tell me immediately that I correct immediately, I would like that version to remain there for everyone :) a speech like this that I just made would find the answer den defined in my overload of a portrait of Edward VII :) --Miss Mattërn (talk) 23:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The original is in the public domain due to its age. This modification, if it is copyrightable, seems likely not in the public domain. It was published in 1935. Was it published by a government under public domain, or by a company? For most works, copyright expires 70 years after the author has died. If the author was 30 in 1935 and for example died at age 90 in 1995, then it would become in the public domain in the year 2065. This is an example. More examples at Commons:Licensing#Material_in_the_public_domain. Krinkle (talk) 23:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Krinkle. Don't waste your time: it's yet another sock of LTA A3cb1, uploading bad quality images, artificially oversized files, copyvios, etc. He's now globally blocked, but you can freely delete the bad quality images you can find, and replace them with better versions. Cheers! Ruthven (msg) 19:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


Please do not overwrite files edit

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


 
I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Second Vatican Council by Lothar Wolleh 005.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

I moved your version to this picture (Second Vatican Council by Lothar Wolleh (005).jpg). Thank you Stv26 (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Ritratto del Conte Emilio Borromeo Arese.jpg edit

 
File:Ritratto del Conte Emilio Borromeo Arese.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply