Stv26

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stv26!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:265 Benedict XVI.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:265 Benedict XVI.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:265 Benedict XVI.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Andel (talk) 09:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

This is a photographic miniature of a mosaic of Saint Paul Outside the Walls of Rome, I added a tag to depicts it in the license. Thanks for inform me ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stv26 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

File

online translation.

Thanks for trying to help you, but your image is uploaded directly from UploadWizard, it is not a derivative work like mine that keeps everything from the author. Do not try to delete it or you will start an edition war, delete yours please, do not insist.

Marium Alberto (talk) 06:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

online translation.

hi, i saw your reversals. I don't see the need to make "that many" files, so I'm going to strongly ask you to revert. The aesthetics when I made the cut in the program I did it because I saw that the part of the book was unnecessary. Then you came, you reverted my changes and I accepted that, since you created the same files with almost the same measurements, but not this time. I emphasize that I want you to revert what you just did, why do you want so many files? in my mod it just takes away the frame it was wrapped with, but doesn't damage the file.

I am also going to ask you to continue using the CropTool program, or I will be forced to consult the deletion of your files that were uploaded with UploadWizard Marium Alberto (talk) 04:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

The Commons:Overwriting existing files says:

If digital restoration work is being done on a historical document or artwork, the restoration (no matter how minor) should always be uploaded under a new filename from the original file, providing a link back to the source on which it was based in the new file's "other versions" field. The changes that were made should also be documented in sufficient detail to reproduce them, if possible. This is best practice for restorations, because it allows users and subsequent restorers to follow the chain of improvements and to make detailed comparison with the originals. (However, if a restoration already performed to a file, for example, missed a dust spot, it is not necessary to have a new file for each small change in the restoration).

There is no an official policy who forbid editors to use CropTool or another different editor to do unframed copies so please, respect my work. I saw that you'd been blocked recently because you've overwritten files without a sepparate file. This is not an own-argument, is a Commons policy so, please respect it!

Greetings. Stv26 (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

exactly says "it is not necessary to have a new file for each small change in the restoration" So I don't see another file being made, I don't stain your work, I try to improve it on the subject, for me it is irrelevant and it would be better to only have the faces than the complete frame; in order to put them in a wikipedia article. ---Marium Alberto (talk) 04:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

For example, with these files of Benedict XVI: Benedict XVI Blessing-2.jpg and Benedict XVI Blessing-1.jpg (both retouched) and Pope Benedict XVI Blessing.jpg (original), while the first original image was cropped to depicts the Pope, the derivatives were not overwriting the original for have only the face/figure of Benedict XVI and the original is also kept because also depicts Benedict XVI instead of the background or "frame", so with this, I think that a quite similar case appears with my crops of the papal portraits. If an editor want to pus only the "figure" or portrait", it's better keep the originals as they are and create a derivative version of that (unless the differences are too little). Stv26 (talk) 10:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Giulio cesare bedeschini, san pietro celestino, 1613, dall'arcivescovado dell'aquila cropped.jpg

File:Giulio cesare bedeschini, san pietro celestino, 1613, dall'arcivescovado dell'aquila cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Giulio cesare bedeschini, san pietro celestino, 1613, dall'arcivescovado dell'aquila.jpg ya existe otro archivo igual Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Marium Alberto.

And also:

• File:Giulio cesare bedeschini, san pietro celestino, 1613, dall'arcivescovado dell'aquila cropped.jpg ( Nominator : Marium Alberto | Reason : Giulio cesare bedeschini, san pietro celestino, 1613, dall'arcivescovado dell'aquila.jpg ya existe otro archivo igual )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 11:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Cementerio Almudena 7.jpg

I'm going to ask you please not to interfere in cases that are not yours. I can take what you did as an act of vandalism, since I warned the other user, and the user uploader, to give me their approval or refusal of the cut. I ask you to reverse the same case, without more happy holidays and greetings. Marium Alberto (talk) 09:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello Marium Alberto, and happy holidays.

At first, I've restored the original file because I have this image on my watchlist, from which I saw the continuous changes. Second, take my contribution however you want but the one who appears to be vandalizing is you for not respecting the work of others.

And third and last, I'm not going to revert the file to the version that you added because it already appears in a separate version that I just added.

So please, respect the work of others and I recommend you to take a little care in the way you send comments to other editors, this is a free media repository, not your property.

Yours sincerely, Stv26 (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sophie Scholl Portrait.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

@Rosenzweig: Oh yes, I hadn't realized that. If I had known before, I wouldn't have made the cropped version and would've opened a DR. Thanks for notice me. Stv26 (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Re: Translation file coat of arms of Pius XII

Thanks for your work. Best regards. Echando una mano (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

@Echando una mano: No need for thanks, it's just been a pleasure to help. ;-)

Best regards! Stv26 (talk) 15:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

(Albi) Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile - Trèsor - Portrait du pape Grégoire XV - PalissyIM81001477.jpg

Your working method is similar to the theft of computer data. I ask the administrators @Christian Ferrer: to please give their opinion on this subject. I hope that only your enthusiasm will take you for a moment and that you will want to be more attentive to our operating rules. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

But I'd only cropped with the tool Croptool and I'd attributed you as the original creator, I didn't treat to steal nothing, my only intention was to add a cropped file of yours. If I'd commeted an error, please explain to me and I'll treat to solve it. Stv26 (talk) 08:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus, before read this comment I'd left a message in your talk page, please see it and if I'd commeted an error, please tell me and I'll treat to solve it. Stv26 (talk) 08:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

An administrator follows our conversations. In a case such as ours, it was necessary to ask the author to make the modification 1) out of politeness 2) because he has the RAW file. This would have taken a few minutes. Now I propose to refer to the initial file on the different Wikis and to delete the file you made. For my part, I will make the framing modification that you have initiated. I take note of your good will which pleads in favor of your good faith. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Thanks for it and I'm sorry for that error. Of course that's I'm going to do. I think that in a hour I'll restore the original.

All kind regards! Stv26 (talk) 08:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus, there it is. The cropped version was deleted after I've opened a SD request. I think that now all is ok. I promise in the future be more careful before do separate edited versions. All kind regards! Stv26 (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

• Everything is back to normal. Thank you for your good faith which I appreciated. If you have any problems, don't hesitate to ask me, I will help you as far as I can. Have a good day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

aged redirects

We keep redirects for old files as the files are not only used here at our sites, but can be used at any site. There is no issue with redirects and they are NOT obsolete.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

New uploads are the duplicate

Hi. If you upload an image that is a duplicate of an existing image, then typically we would mark the new version as the duplicate where it is of the same quality.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh I didn't see it before. Sorry for that. Also thanks for redirect pictures. :-) Stv26 (talk) 22:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Pope JPII.jpg

File:Pope JPII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

XenonX3 (talk) 21:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

File:His Holiness Pius XII offers blessing.jpg

File:His Holiness Pius XII offers blessing.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: According to [1] and other news sites this is a photo that's being distributed by Associated Press. Looks like Flickr washing. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

XenonX3 (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

@XenonX3. It was taken in 1945, it will be in the Public Domain in Italy. Stv26 (talk) 22:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

@XenonX3, I'd moved it to a Deletion Request, because the picture could be Public Domain in Italy. Stv26 (talk) 22:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pope Paul III by Titian in National Museum of Capodimonte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and often used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Her Highness Queen Elizabeth, by Cecil Beaton.jpg

File:Her Highness Queen Elizabeth, by Cecil Beaton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKay (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

@DrKay: Oh dear, I haven't realized that. If I'd known before, I would've opened a DR. Thanks for notice me. Stv26 (talk) 09:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paolo III con il camauro (Pope Paul III with camauro) by Titian in National Museum of Capodimonte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Welcome to VIC, Stv26! It's customary here to give the title in italics in the original language (Italian), with the English translation in parentheses. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

OMG, I didn't remember it. Sorry... I'm going to add it now. Thanks for notice me ;) Stv26 (talk) 10:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

I put it, I hope there is good now, please notice me if something else is requested ;) Stv26 (talk) 10:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope. Everything is good now. Thanks for the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Retrato de Francisco Marto (Portrait of Francisco Marto).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Terribly sad picture, but best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

File:John Paul II.jpg

File:John Paul II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ptjackyll (leave a message) 19:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Portrait of Maurice of Savoy (by Esprit Grandjean known as Monsù Spirito) – Castle of Racconigi.jpg

File:Portrait of Maurice of Savoy (by Esprit Grandjean known as Monsù Spirito) – Castle of Racconigi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amaraki (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

File:265 Benedict XVI.png

File:265 Benedict XVI.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TFerenczy (talk) 16:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Messaggio del Papa nel centenario del Collegio Volta.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Messaggio del Papa nel centenario del Collegio Volta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Hekerui (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

The original picture was uploaded by Belze87 (Italian Wikipedia) and licensed with GFDL-self-it and I modified it to replace the picture of Pope John Paul II unavailable under a free license with one available under a free license (from Gov.pl and licensed with CC-BY-3.0 pl). Stv26 (talk) 12:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Papa centenario.jpg

Please see the current status due to its connection to Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Paul II.jpg. Hekerui (talk) 23:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Pope Paul III (Titian - National Museum of Capodimonte) – edited.jpg

File:Pope Paul III (Titian - National Museum of Capodimonte) – edited.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 83.61.231.21.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

COM:OVERWRITE

FYI, "replacement with higher resolution versions of the same file" is permitted by COM:OVERWRITE, so your revert to File:VictorEmmanuel2.jpg was wrong. Best, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

@Mdaniels5757 the person who uploaded that picture edited it with an AI editor. For that I reverted it and later uploaded it as a separate file. You can find it here File:VictorEmmanuel2FXD.jpg. Thank you for notice me and best regards ;-) Stv26 (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh, it was AI? Never mind then. Sorry for bothering you. :) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

@Mdaniels5757 No problem. For that I uploaded as a separate file. Don't worry. ;-) Stv26 (talk) 00:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Images

Hello, By you restoring the uncropped versions of the images now all the articles that I added my cropped versions to have been replaced with the uncropped versions. I saw that you re-uploaded the cropped versions separately, so could you help please go to all the articles that I added the cropped versions to that now have uncropped lead images and replace them with the cropped versions you uploaded separately. Thanks. Robertus Pius (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

@Robertus Pius No problem. Give me a few minutes and I'll get to it. ;-)

As you wrote me before, I would like to recommend you generally try to upload cropped versions as separate files so that the originals can also be accessed by anyone. ;-)

Stv26 (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Alright, I’ll upload them separately in the future. Thanks Robertus Pius (talk) 19:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giovannino nel deserto (Saint John the Baptist in the Wilderness) by Raffaello Sanzio in the Uffizi Tribuna, Gallerie degli Uffizi, Florence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La cugina Argia (Cousin Argia) by Giovanni Fattori in Galleria d'arte moderna, Florence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Neutral For someone never seen the portrait with one's own eyes it is very hard to say, which version, greenish or brownish, is closer to the original. --LexKurochkin (talk) 19:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I don't remember seeing it either, but the Uffuzi version seems like this. Charlesjsharp (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ritratto di Giulio II (Portrait of Julius II) by Raffaello Sanzio in Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ragazzo che soffia su un tizzone acceso (Boy Blowing an Ember, El Soplón) by El Greco in National Museum of Capodimonte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atalanta e Ippomene (Atalanta and Hippomenes) by Guido Reni in National Museum of Capodimonte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Pietro Bembo by Titian in the National Gallery of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Rt Hon Gerry Reynolds MP & EQ II & QM.jpg

Hello Stv26, the article could do with an image . Do you have other photos at hand, or would a cropped version be an option to add to the article and to Wikidata? Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Good afternoon @Lotje, a cropped version would be the best option to add a picture to the article and to Wikidata. However I'm not sure where Gerald William Reynolds is exactly in the picture. Two gentlemen appear in the picture with Queen Elizabeth II and the Queen Mother, but I don't find in the picture's text which of them is Reynolds, is that who wears a military uniform or that who wears a civilian suit, in the middle between QEII and her mother?

When Reynolds is identified, a cropped version of the picture could then be uploaded under a separate name than the existing file. Thank you for notice me and best regards! ;-) Stv26 (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Stv26, I couldn't tell you who's who either. If I ever find out, I'll pick up with you again. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Image crop requests

Hi User:Stv26 I use Wikipedia and noticed you previously cropped images so I was wondering if you would mind cropping the following images so they can be used on the following

to be used on Esther Rantzen and Angela Rippon

and

to be used on Brendan O'Carroll and Jennifer Gibney

thanks 2A02:C7C:9238:D400:C12B:A30A:268E:2BCF 01:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

There it is. You can find the pictures at File:Angela Rippon - Queen Elizabeth II Platinum Jubilee 2022 - Platinum Pageant (52123378342).jpg, File:Esther Rantzen - Queen Elizabeth II Platinum Jubilee 2022 - Platinum Pageant (52123378342).jpg, File:Brendan O'Carroll as the Grand Marshal At The St. Patrick's Day Parade In Dublin (REF-102282).jpg and File:Jennifer Gibney At The St. Patrick's Day Parade In Dublin REF-102282 (16640203117).jpg. Stv26 (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. GPSLeo (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Good afternoon @GPSLeo, thank you so much for that and for notice. I'm committed to continue contributing in the same way as until now, always complying with our policies and guidelines as best as possible. Thank you also for notice me. ;-)

All kind regards! Stv26 (talk) 11:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Image crop request

Hi Stv26 thank you for previously cropping images. Could you please crop the following image of the woman on the left so it can be used on [2] this page on Wikipedia. Thanks.

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:C7C:9238:D400:E1D5:F1BA:B653:2C64 (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

There it is. You can find the picture at Scarlette Douglas Electro Velvet ESC2015 Eurovision Village Vienna (01).jpg. Stv26 (talk) 14:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Higher resolution images

Ciao, PLEASE can you download from Google Arts & Culture the higher resolution version for the following image?

• 

Thank you and ciao. FDRMRZUSA, 17 January 2024

There it is @FDRMRZUSA, you can find the picture at the same file page.

All kind regards! Stv26 (talk) 14:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

GRAZIE!!!! THANK YOU!!!! FDRMRZUSA, 18 January 2024

---

Ciao, PLEASE can you download from Google Arts & Culture (and overwrite the pre-existing lower resolution image), the higher resolution version for the following image?

• 
  Original colors version from Alte Pinakothek, Munich

Thank you and ciao. FDRMRZUSA, 21 January 2024

There it is @FDRMRZUSA, you can find the picture at the same file page.

All kind regards! Stv26 (talk) 14:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

GRAZIE!!!! THANK YOU!!!! FDRMRZUSA, 28 January 2024

---

Ciao, PLEASE can you download from National Galleries of Scotland, Government Art Collection and Google Arts & Culture (and overwrite the pre-existing lower resolution images), the higher resolution version for the following images?

• 
• 
• 

The first image is similar (but better) to File:After Henry Perronet Briggs (1791-1793–1844) - Arthur Wellesley (1769–1852), 1st Duke of Wellington, Field Marshal and Prime Minister - 1324 - Government Art Collection.jpg

Thank you and ciao. FDRMRZUSA, 22-27 March 2024

@FDRMRZUSA, of course, but this time, as I'm busy with some personal issues, I'll take a little longer to upload the pictures, but I'll let you know as soon as I upload them. I found that File:Alfred d'Orsay (1801–1852) - Arthur Wellesley (1769–1852), 1st Duke of Wellington, Field Marshal and Prime Minister - 0-59 - Government Art Collection.jpg has only the low resolution picture ([3]), but the other two have a higher resolution option.

I'll let you know as soon as I upload both pictures. All kind regards! Stv26 (talk) 12:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

AI "enhanced" pictures of paintings by Giorgio Pallavicini

Dear Stv26, I am writing to you since I noticed that you have already intervened in the same issue created by User:Giorgio Pallavicini, blocked in March 2023. I have good reason to believe that he is behind User:Fefecece, since punctually the files he uploaded are then used by Giorgio Pallavicini in wikipedia projects where he is not blocked. I do not find myself in much agreement with his actions. I understand that he wants to improve files that are objectively not of the best quality, but his operation - I believe through an AI - creates products that are far from the original color grading of the paintings in question]] (not to mention that he gives all the paintings a sort of beauty filter planing effect). Case in point: a photo of a portrait I took at the Uffizi (admittedly perhaps too dark, but the original painting as can be seen from other professionally taken photos is certainly not bright and full of contrasts [4]) and the flashy version proposed by Giorgio Pallavicini/Fefecece. I realized today that he has continued to do so after the block, as he is now uploading many images related to the Grand Duchy of Tuscany (a theme I follow closely on Commons and on my reference Wikipedia, the Italian one). Unlike the Italian Wikipedia, I don't know exactly how to act for these kinds of issues on Commons (reporting to do an IP check and reporting problematic users). But having seen that you had already followed "this case," I thought you could help me. Thank you in advance for your attention. Best regards, Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 13:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

I apologize if I did something wrong, if I did it it was with the best intentions sincerely, I absolutely didn't want to create a case, I just tried to improve some images while maintaining their spirit and characteristics, practically unchanged from the point of view of the line and only cleaned up, in some cases by adjusting the colors a little but without altering the image as a whole, if some cases are less functional it can be discussed, but I sincerely hope not to be blocked, my intention is not to ruin Wikipedia but to improve it, so I believe that I still have something good to contribute to the project. Obviously feel free to give me any advice and advice you deem appropriate. Sincerely yours, Giorgio Pallavicini 78.208.117.197 15:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Well @Kaho Mitsuki, if it's true that at that time I reverted some of that person's overwrites, like you I also didn't know how to inform other users (and honestly to this date I still don't know how do it) and I didn't find out about their blocking until some months later. However, I looked a little deeper and found this page that seems to be what you're looking for ([5] check to see if it is, because I'm not too sure). All kind regards and let me know if I can help you with anything else. ;-) Stv26 (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)