Rosier

bonjour, vous pouvez me retrouver sur wiki, là aussi comme rosier

Bienvenue

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Rosier!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, cela donne : `Image:Foo.jpg` Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : `{{bad name\|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}}` Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

Rien de tel que le petit message standard pour te donner quelques liens utiles :-) le Korrigan →bla 10:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Magnolia1.r.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Magnolia1.r.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify a free license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created/took the picture, then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Überraschungsbilder 08:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merci :-) --Überraschungsbilder 23:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Cognac9.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 10:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please add a license to the image. You did the same for the image above this one. Cheers! Siebrand 11:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

en français: Veuillez ajouter une licence a l'image. Vous avez fait la meme chose pour l'image au-dessus. NielsF talk/overleg/discussion/discussione 12:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

j'ai rajouté la licence et la phrase convenable, à ta place. Peus-tu juste le confirmer dessous... En fait tu certifies être l'auteur et tu laisses la photo dans le domaine public... dans les conditions prévues par la licence (Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-2.5)... Ddfree 14:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

exact Merci --Rosier 17:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Fontenille2.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 09:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Fontenille2.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 10:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Chateaub5_resized.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 21:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Salut,

Par analogie avec le photo non-resized, je t'ai mis la licence {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0|author=I, [[User:Rosier|Rosier]]}}. Evidemment si tu n'es pas d'accoed, tu peux la changer. Romary 11:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Chalivoy.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Jonzac2.13.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jonzac2.13.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 22:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:HommePendu.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

--Legoktm ^{(Talk | Bot)} 20:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:JMajorelle1.36.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 17:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Barbezières1.3.JPG

Please tag your images

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 13:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Charente

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Salut Rosier,

Je viens de créer les catégories pour tout un tas de communes de ce département (Agris, Ambérac, Anais, Ars, Asnières-sur-Nouère, Balzac, Barbezières, Cellettes, Charmé, Coulgens, Coulonges, Douzat, Échallat, Guimps, Hiersac, Jauldes, Lachaise, La Faye, Lagarde-sur-le-Né, La Magdeleine, Louzac-Saint-André, Marsac, Mérignac, Montchaude, Montignac-Charente, Montjean, Moulidars, Rouillac, Saint-Amant-de-Boixe, Saint-Amant-de-Nouère, Saint-Genis-d'Hiersac, Saint-Palais-du-Né, Vouharte, Xambes...)

J'en ai profité pour recatégoriser les photos correspondantes. À mon avis, comme les gens ont plus de chance de faire une recherche sur un bled en particulier, ça sera plus facile pour eux de trouver au même endroit toutes les photos de la commune concernée.

Dans la foulée, j'ai créé tous les Post offices in France by department (ce fut long et chiant). À l'avenir, tu pourras donc catégoriser les bureaux de poste dans Post offices in Charente.

D'ailleurs, dans le même genre, j'ai vu que tu avais mis de nombreuses croix dans Religious buildings in Charente. À mon avis (je peux me tromper), cette catégorie concerne plutôt les chapelles et autres lieux de culte (autre que les églises / cathédrales, qui ont leurs propres catégories). Pour les croix sans rien, j'aurai plutôt mis Crosses in France, et pour celles avec le Christ crucifié, Wayside crosses in France ? Ça mériterai de poser la question sur le bistro (puis vu le nombre de croix qu'il doit y avoir en France, s'assurer que toutes les sous-catégories par départements soient bien présentes...)

Il me reste encore un grand nombre de tes photos à recatégoriser, mais ça avance :)

En tout cas, chapeau pour toutes tes photos. Ça représente pas mal de temps de travail (et sûrement d'argent pour le carburant). Si seulement des gens pouvaient s'y coller pour tous les autres départements :) Okki (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Encore moi :) J'ai vu dans mon historique que t'avais tenté de mettre un lien vers une catégorie. Pour créer un tel lien et que ce ne soit pas la page qui soit catégorisée, il faut mettre deux points avant Category. Ce qui nous donne [[:Category:Dolmen in Charente]]. Ça marche aussi pour les liens interlangues. Sur Wikipédia, [[:en:Dolmen|Dolmen]] créera un lien vers l'article anglophone dolmen plutôt que de créer un interlien. Voilà, c'était la minute transimission du wiki savoir :) Okki (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Commons:Photo scavenger hunts

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Rosier. I'd like to let you know you can now sign up as a participant in this new WikiProject. The WikiProject's talk page should be a good forum for future discussions. Thank you.--Pharos (talk) 02:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Château de Grand-Bigard

Bonjour,

Merci de m'avoir averti et félicitations pour votre article.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 23:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

Latest comment: 13 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Rosier!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 10:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Nantes nov 2008.1.JPG is uncategorized since 27 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 10:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Image:Embourie1.2.JPG is uncategorized since 16 April 2009.
Image:FosséduRoy3.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:JMajorelle1.30.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:CigarBox1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Cressac0.2.jpg was uncategorized on 14 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:RichemontStGcrypte2.jpg was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC) Fait--Rosier (talk) 14:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:RichemontStGcrypte1.jpg was uncategorized on 3 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC) Fait--Rosier (talk) 14:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Vestiges enfouis 2.pdf was uncategorized on 12 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:NacréRonce1.2.jpg was uncategorized on 24 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Embourie1.1.JPG

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

File:Embourie1.1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ce serait juste un titre de deux ou trois mots, je comprendrais, mais là il s'agit d'un texte de plusieurs phrases, donc je pense qu'il est protégé au titre du droit d'auteur. Teofilo (talk) 07:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Retouché quelques catégories

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier. Maintenant que j'ai bien compris le système, je voulais juste te prévenir que j'ai changé quelques catégories; par exemple: Category:Dolmens in Charente (avec le s). Ainsi que Category:Ancient Roman architecture in Charente en Category:Ancient Roman sites in Charente (pour homogénéité).
J'ai aussi créé Category:Springs of Touvre River et des catégories d'affluents de la Charente. J'ai aussi vu tes 1500 photos , ainsi que celles de Père Igor, bravo !
Quelques divergences avec toi (je ne suis pas sûr donc je n'ai pas trop modifié):

une photo de voie romaine doit-elle être considérée aussi comme un "site" ?
la Category:Charente River doit-elle vraiment être tronçonnée (Angoulême-Cognac et le reste) ?
des photos de croix: Category:Religious buildings in Charente ou Category:Crosses in France (doit-on faire Category:Crosses in Charente ?)
dans Category:Gallo-Roman theatre in Les Bouchauds, ce serait plutôt "at" que "in" Les Bouchauds.

J'ai compris assez tardivement qu'il fallait mettre la sous-catégorie la plus concise possible, sans répéter les catégories englobantes (ex: si pour une photo on met Category:Anguienne, ce n'est pas la peine de mettre Category:Rivers of Charente). A bientôt, Jack ma (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Finalement, pour le commonscat, ça marche pour les 2 cas (Natura 2000 et Charente (fleuve)) si on ne met que Category:Charente River Angoulême-Cognac pour une photo entre Angoulême et Cognac - j'ai fait un essai dans le bac à sable. Pour {{commons|Category:Charente River|fleuve Charente}} dans [[Charente (fleuve)]], il faut cliquer sur la sous-catégorie Angoulême-Cognac; ce n'est pas trop gênant... J'espère que Balzac était joli, dommage que la météo ne soit pas encore de la partie. Jack ma (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Catégorie pour chaque Monument historique (Charente ou ailleurs)

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier. Je crois qu'il serait bien de créer une catégorie pour chaque monument historique qu'on rencontre, à la façon que Père Igor a fait pour Category:Monuments historiques in Dordogne (avec le logo File:Logo monument historique - rouge ombré.svg, il en a fait 3 en Charente périgordine, voir Category:Marthon). Je commencerai dès que je peux de mon côté; je commence par Category:Dignac (je m'appuie sur http://www.patrimoine-de-france.org/oeuvres/richesses-82.html#departement, qui s'appuie sur la base Mérimée mais pratique à consulter). Il n'y a aucune incidence sur les articles communaux existants (à part si on veut ajouter des commonscat spécifiques). J'ai aussi créé Category:Wayside crosses in Charente comme on a dit. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Je viens de converser avec Père Igor (voir aussi sa réponse), j'y vois plus clair: créer les catégories au fur et à mesure. Jack ma (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Classement églises de Charente

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier. Je suis en train de classer toutes les églises de Charente, si monument historique, ou par commune (si plusieurs photos). Je fais ça petit à petit car il y en a beaucoup ;-) J'ai des doutes sur quelques photos, car il y a parfois plusieurs églises (classées MH) dans la même commune. Par exemple :

File:Graves1.7.JPG: s'agit-il de St-Martin ou St-Amant ?
File:LSonneville1.JPG: Notre-Dame, St-Palais-des-Combes ou Ste-Trinité ? (j'ai déjà classé les 2 autres photos d'église de Lignières à Category:Église Notre-Dame de Lignières, je me suis peut-être trompé).

J'ai aussi vu que quelques églises étaient des prieurés, dont certains bénédictins. J'ai donc créé Category:Priories in Charente et complé Category:Benedictine priories in France. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 09:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

En plus de fr:Églises de la Charente, j'utilise cette adresse (on y voit 3 églises paroissiales à Lignières). Merci pour les renseignements... Bonne journée, Jack ma (talk) 10:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Il me reste à classer les Category:Churches in Charente à partir de la lettre R, mais je vais prendre quelques (vraies) vacances ;-). J'ai créé Category:Benedictine priories in Charente, car il y en avait pas mal. Demain je vais faire quelques photos à Angoulême (rayon de 10km), beau temps assuré, mais chaud. Bonne continuation, Jack ma (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Charente Angoulême-Cognac et Natura 2000

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier.
Peux-tu me préciser quel est l'article qui utilise Category:Charente River Angoulême-Cognac ?
Sinon, je n'ai pas encore eu le temps de classer la suite des églises de Charente, mais je n'oublie pas. Hier il m'a fallu 1 jour et demi pour charger mes 240 photos (Angoulême). Mais je vais encore m'arracher de mon ordinateur quelques jours ;-) Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merci, je n'avais pas trouvé l'article fr:Vallée de la Charente entre Angoulême et Cognac. Car j'ai vu ce matin sur l'article sur fr:Vars que cette partie de la Charente, pourtant en amont d'Angoulême, était aussi dans la zone Natura 2000. Pour info, d'après les règles de "surcatégorisation", une même photo ne doit pas se trouver à la fois dans Category:Charente River Angoulême-Cognac et sa classe mère Category:Charente River (mais ce n'est pas un problème car le "commonscat" sur la vallée de la Charente permet d'accéder aussi à la partie entre Angoulême et Cognac). Bonne journée, Jack ma (talk) 11:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ok, je comprends mieux. Donc ça tombe bien: comme il y a beaucoup de photos dans Category:Charente River, on va "catégorifier" (2 classes de plus) avec la Charente en amont d'Angoulême (jusqu'à sa source), et celle en aval de Cognac - après une petite pause ;-) Jack ma (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Rosier. Finalement, si tu es d'accord, je crée Category:Charente River by section, avec les 3 sections (source, Angoulême, Cognac, océan), en respectant le nom de la section que tu as déjà créée. Par contre, chaque photo sera renseignée dans la section concernée, mais aussi dans Category:Charente River. Je ne pense pas que ce soit de la "surcatégorisation" (erreur classique du débutant), car il y a la classe Category:Charente River by section interposée. Mais c'est discutable (on peut aussi ne renseigner chaque photo que dans sa section concernée). As-tu un avis? Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 10:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

catégorie Campenards renommée

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonsoir Rosier. J'ai supprimé Category:Campenards in France et créé Category:Bell gables in Charente (synonyme, après longue enquête, voir bistro). Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 21:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dates des photos

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier. Tu vas peut-être me trouver chipoteur ;-) mais peux-tu stp mettre les dates sur tes photos ainsi: Exemple, pour le 2 juin 2009: 2009-06-02, ou bien 02.06.2009, mais pas 02.06.09, sinon le robot qui corrige les dates ne peut pas s'y retrouver. Bonne journée, Jack ma (talk) 11:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ne mets pas non plus la date en toutes lettres (je crois que le robot ne reconnaît pas non plus). Le robot transforme la date en AAAA-MM-JJ, s'il le peut (ex: 2009-06-02, pour 2 juin); ça permet de voir affiché: "2 juin 2009" pour un Français, "June 2nd 2009" pour un Anglais etc... (c'est ce qui s'appelle (en angais) "localization", c'est-à-dire que chaque nationalité voit la date en sa langue). Le mieux est vraiment d'écrire: 02.06.2009, ou 02/06/2009, ou 2009.06.02, ou directement 2009-06-02. Bonne soirée, Jack ma (talk) 16:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nouvelles catégories charentaises

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour Rosier. Si tu ne les avais pas déjà vues, les catégories suivantes sont nouvelles:

Cdlt, Jack ma (talk) 07:19, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Super! Il y a aussi Category:Dovecote towers in Charente et Category:towers in Charente Bon travail et bonne journée --Rosier (talk) 08:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oui, j'avais repéré cette catégorie pour les pigeonniers ;-) Bonne journée toi aussi, Jack ma (talk) 08:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Rosier; encore quelques nouvelles catégories...

Category:Église Saint-Léger (Cognac)
Category:Ancient Roman roads in Charente
Category:Forests in Charente
communes supplémentaires...
Category:Community halls in Charente (pour salles des fêtes)

Jack ma (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suppression rapide catégorie erronée

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonsoir Rosier. Quand tu veux supprimer une catégorie erronée, indique juste {{speedydelete|écrire le motif ici}} sur la page de ta catégorie. Cordialement. --Père Igor (talk) 20:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour. Ce que je fais aussi, après avoir créé la bonne catégorie et transféré les images de la catégorie erronée manuellement (ou avec "cat-a-lot" quand il y en a beaucoup), une fois vide, j'y mets comme seule ligne {{speedy|empty}}. Jack ma (talk) 06:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Une croix templière

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Bonjour Rosier, tu as pris cette photo chapelle de Cressac et je voudrais savoir si tu as le détail de la croix rouge qui se trouve peinte au chevet. Comme tu peux le voir, nous sommes à la recherche d'une identification d'une autre croix par comparaison. Merci d'avance.--90.12.225.13 11:53, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Elle est inscrite dans un cercle. Cette autre photo pourra peut-être t'aider--Rosier (talk) 13:26, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merci. --90.80.14.138 18:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Aurochs

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier. Je suis tombé sur des photos d'aurochs que tu avais prises sans nom de commune. J'ai les ai mises à Category:Nanteuil-en-Vallée (d'après Internet). Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 05:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Architecture of Royan 1950s

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

J’ai entamé une discussion sur Commons talk:Deletion requests/Category:Architecture of Royan 1950s. Cdlt, VIGNERON * ^discut. 20:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Puits couverts

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier. Voici les puits couverts de Ballans (pris par toi-même en 2007) et de Rulle. Jack ma (talk) 09:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Puits de Ballans

Puits de Rulle

File:Montjean9.JPG

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Montjean9.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rosier,
in case you haven't seen my reply to your comment on my talkpage, I copy it to here:
Pardon, mais je ne sais pas trop the francais. If your complaint is about Montjean9.JPG, the problem was that your photo was of a likely copyrighted artwork and there is no freedom of panorama in France. --Túrelio (Diskussion) 21:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Papillons

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bonjour Rosier,

j'ai vue votre demande de photos de papillons sur le bistrot. j'ai bien 3 photos de papillons (2 sur le Vaucluse + 1 en Essonne) que peuvent peu être vous interresser, mais ne connaissant pas du tout le sujet, je ne peux pas les nommés correctement, je ne les ai pas encore mis en ligne. puis je vous en faire passer une copie des clichés par e mail, afin de vous s'ils vous conviennent ? Véronique PAGNIER 15:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Ok, mais il faut que tu m'envoie un mail pour que je puisse te répondre ce qui te donne mon adresse mail perso. Ou tu les places sur commons en "inconnus" avec demande de nommage au café des biologistes, au choix. Bonne journée --Rosier (talk) 08:19, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Rosier,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Konya04.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Konya04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Takabeg (talk) 04:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Une série faite avec mon Olympus, dans la cohue du musée, c'est bien de l'honneur de les prendre pour celles d'un photographe professionnel--Rosier (talk) 10:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Chasseneuil2.3.JPG

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Chasseneuil2.3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

82.124.112.36 21:38, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Emploi de la localisation

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rosier,

Je suis en train de regarder tes photos de MH (très belles !) et je retouche les coordonnées. Un petit truc à savoir sur {{Location}} :

On emploie {{Location}} pour la localisation de l'appareil photo lors de la prise de vue, ou bien {{Object location}} pour la position du monument ou de l'objet photographié.

Dans chacun de ces 2 cas, les coordonnées sont en degrés, minutes, secondes. Pour des coordonnées décimales, on emploie les modèles {{Location dec}} ou {{Object location dec}}. Ainsi, toutes les coordonnées que j'ai vues sur tes photos charentaises depuis septembre 2012 sont erronées, car tu as voulu les mettre en degrés, minutes, secondes avec le modèle pour les coordonnées décimales.

Exemples :

File:TussonTumuli2.JPG représentant les 4 tumuli de Tusson, vus d'une distance de 500 m. {{Location dec|45.9339|0.0754|region:FR-16_heading:E}} représente la position de l'appareil photo, en coordonnées décimales, regardant vers l'est.

C'est équivalent à : {{Location|45|55|58|N|0|4|31|E|region:FR-16_heading:E}} (coordonnées en degrés, minutes, secondes). Tu vois donc que 45.9339 n'est pas du tout pareil que 45.5558 (distance d'environ 30 km).

Ci-dessus, le region: et heading: sont purement indicatifs (ils sont optionnels). Ils indiquent le pays et département (FR-16) et la direction de l'appareil photo (ex: NW = vue prise vers le nord-ouest), cette dernière n'ayant un sens que pour {{Location}}.

On met de préférence bien sûr la position de l'objet photographié; par exemple dans Category:Tumulus du Gros Dognon : {{Object location dec|45.9336|0.0831|region:FR-16}}

comme tu avais fait dans File:TussonGsDognon.JPG : {{Location dec|45.5600|0.0459}} qui aurait dû être {{Object location|45|56|00|N|0|04|59|E}}, mais que j'ai mise dans la catégorie, car elle concerne l'objet photographié.

Je commence seulement à comprendre l'usage de ces modèles.

Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:TussonMaison1.1.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:TussonMaison1.1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Didym (talk) 13:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:MontbronFonchevade3.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:MontbronFonchevade3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Didym (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Angoulême1.1.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Angoulême1.1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:HaricotsSurgelés.JPG

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:HaricotsSurgelés.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:BoitesHarV.JPG

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:BoitesHarV.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Josve05a (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Anville4.JPG

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Anville4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cantepien (talk) 10:57, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Anville.JPG

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Anville.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cantepien (talk) 10:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Grenouille24.02.1.JPG

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Grenouille24.02.1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Salix (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Embourie1.7.JPG

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Embourie1.7.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

VP16 (talk) 13:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic