User talk:Takabeg/Archive2011
User talk:Takabeg/Archive2012
User talk:Takabeg/Archive2013

English: Welcome to the Commons, Takabeg!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 14:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

About Copyvio files edit

Hi Takabeg! You marked some of the photos that you think is a violation of copyright.Bildiğim kadarıyla,TSK fotoğrafları OTRS izinli ve sizde birçok fotoğrafı yüklemişsiniz.Ecevit fotoğrafı ve World Press Photo Hollanda Ulusal Arşivlerinde mevcuttur ve bunun birçok somut örneği var. [1] ve [2]. Cyprus Dispute karikatürü yine aynı şekilde Kanada Kütüphane ve Arşivlerinde ID numaraları ile mevcut. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Fotoğrafında haklısın sanırım.Telifli. --Maurice07 (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Selam, Maurice07. I cannot think that the original copyright holders of them are the governments of the Netherlands and/or Canada. Takabeg (talk) 10:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Haklısınız sanırım. Ben yazar sahibi 1943 yılında vefat ettiği için PD-old altında bir sorun olmaz diye düşünmüştüm.Yine de siz benden daha tecrübelisiniz.İyi çalışmalar.--Maurice07 (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sanırım 1 January 2014 tarihinde kamu malı olacak :) Takabeg (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pic date edit

I have to check this, nevertheless the specific picture on various historical papers is described as such (arrival of Pr. George). So, by now the possible period taken could be any day from May 1919 to Sep. 1922.Alexikoua (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kitap edit

? Takabeg (talk) 02:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Resimler kamu malı. Kapakta başka hiçbir özgün resim de yok. Bu yüzden telif hakkı ihlali olmaz, yanlış mı düşünüyorum?--Rapsar (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Boyleler de varmis Takabeg (talk) 02:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tekini silinmeye aday gösterdiğim, diğer ikisi de kendi çekimi gibi duruyor.--Rapsar (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Diğerleri kim? Ans. şahıs değiller sanırım, onlar da aday artık :)--Rapsar (talk) 21:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Rica ederim sıkıştırma değil de ufak bir hastalığım var pek gidemiyorum bir yerlere bi de arabam bozuldu bir de üstüne taşınma olayı falan var onun da üstüne vizeler falan var 1.ler bitiyor 2.ler başlıyor kusuruma bakma o yüzden :/--Reality 23:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Doğru sözlere ne denilir? Teşekkür ederim. --i.е. v-mail 09:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Poplavok park and the Circular park edit

Yes Poplavok is within the Circular park.--Preacher lad (talk) 07:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yenikale - Arsameia edit

Hi Takabeg! Renaming the files around Arsameia is ok. But giving the Picture file:ArsameiaYenikale.JPG the new name file:Arsameia.jpg is like having a picture of Rumelihisar and giving it the name Istanbul.jpg. Could you please tell your friend Rapsar to give it a correct name. Greetings --Kpisimon (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

file:Arsameia.jpg is completely wrong name. Because the image is not Arsameia (Eskikale) but Yenikale. Daha önce de Rapsar'a söylemiştim ve demin tekrardan söyledim. Takabeg (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks --Kpisimon (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

For your info. Jcb (talk) 21:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Recipients of the Medal of Independence with Red-Green Ribbon edit

Bu ne biçim inceleme ? Category:Recipients of the Medal of Independence with Red-Green Ribbon (Turkey) almak için Category:Members of the First Grand National Assembly (1920-1923) olması şarttır. Birde 23 Ekim 1923 mi daha erken 21 Kasım 1923 mi ? Takabeg (talk) 10:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Soru sorma veya gösterme biçiminize lütfen Bu ne biçim inceleme? türünde devam etmeyiniz..! Bu türde kelimeler ile mesaj yazacaksanız, lütfen hiç yazmayınız. Hasan Pamuk şeklinde yeni bir madde açılmıştı ve bende onun devamında, taşıma yaptıktan sonra kullanıcının yaptığı değişiklikler ile ilgilenirken oluşmuş hataymış. Dilerseniz gereken yerlere konuyla ilgili bildirimde bulunabilirsiniz veya engelli olduğunuz için bildirmenize yardımcı olabilirim. --i.е. v-mail 12:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
İlginç. Diğer kullanıcılar böyle tepki göstermiyorlar. Çünkü onlar en:Wikipedia:Assume good faith biliyorlar. Sonuçta okuyuculara zarar vermemek lazım. Takabeg (talk) 14:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ben Vikipedi'ye siz bana Bu ne biçim inceleme? diyesiniz diye katkı yapmıyorum. Ayrıca İyi niyet varsayın politikasını da iyi biliyorum ve kusura bakmayın ama böyle iyi niyet olmaz. Ben size "Bunlar ne biçim sözler?" desem iyi niyet mi var sayacaksınız? Lütfen iğneyi artık kendinize batırınız. Ayrıca iki defadır (Muhtemelen sayfanız izleme listemde mi, diye kontrol etmek için olduğunu düşünüyorum.) yanıtları kendi sayfanıza yazıyor, benim sayfama yazmıyorsunuz. Ben size yalnızca yukarıdaki tarzda sorular ile soracaksanız yazmayın dedim. Sonra yazdıklarınızda bir sıkıntı yok ki..! --i.е. v-mail 16:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Taksim protestoları edit

Merhaba Takabeg. Nasılsın? Önemli bir istekte bulunacaktım, Gezi Parkı olaylarını görmüş olmalısın. Maddesi Türkçe Vikipedi'de açıldı. İngilizcem yetersiz, İngilizce Vikipedi'de sen de maddesini açabilir misin? Reuters ve BBC gibi yayın organlarında ilgi görüyordu en son bu olay. Sevgilerimle.--Bermanya (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ve aleyküm. Seni kırmak istemedim ama haber niteliğindeki madde yazmıyorum. Takabeg (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

İzmir Suikastı edit

Selamlar. Buradaki kitap sende var değil mi? Tarama yapman mümkün mü konuyla ilgili sayfaları? Kullanayım maddede.--Rapsar (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gerçi kitabın tamamı konuyla ilgiliymiş :)--Rapsar (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Evet. Tamamı konuyla ilgili. Takabeg (talk) 11:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ankara'daki yargılamalarla ilgili resim var mı peki? O başlık resimsiz kalmasın :)--Rapsar (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Bir de sana zahmet Ankara'daki yargılamalarda kimler yargılanmış (daha doğrusu beraat edenlerin isimleri) diye bakar mısın? Hiçbir yerde bulamadım.--Rapsar (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Burada diyor ki: 40 kişi İzmir'de, 57 kişi Ankara'da yargılandı. İzmir'deki 40 kişi tamam; ancak buradaki 9 kişi Ankara'ya sevkedilmiş. Bunları da dahil ederek Ankara'daki 57 kişi rakamına da ulaştım en nihayetinde :) Ancak verdiğim bağlantıda toplam 97 kişi yargılandı diyor. Muhtemelen bu sevk edilen 9 kişi, hem Ankara'da hem İzmir'de saymışlar ve 97 bulmuşlar. Tek yok bunları senin o kitaptan teyit etmek :)--Rapsar (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Burada Millî Mücadelede İttihatçılık kitabını tavsiye etmiştim. PDF'ini buldum, okuyacağım.--Rapsar (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
İlgili kitaplar depoda, yani şu an elimde değil. Birde ölü fotoğraf meselesi ne oldu ? Konsensüs konusu netleştirilse iyi olacaktır. Gereksiz tartışma çıkmasın. Takabeg (talk) 01:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sen hiç Türkçe Vikipedi'de bir konsesüs oluştuğunu, hatta tartışmanın sonlandığını gördün mü? :)--Rapsar (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Depoda. Takabeg (talk) 06:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Selamlar. Hâlâ mı? :) Madde için lazım.--Rapsar (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mehmed Cavid Bey edit

Cavid Bey daha yaygın değil mi?--Rapsar (talk) 08:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yaygin. Takabeg (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Madde 20 edit

Bi teklifin varmı? --Cekli829 (talk) 06:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Umarım kabul edeceklerdir. Ancak sadece Azerbaicani Wikipedia'dan değil, diğer kanal ve kuruluşlardan da teklif gelirse iyi olacağını düşünüyorum. Takabeg (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Siteyi incelemedim ama ilk bakışta Ermeni POVi var sanki. Makalenin kendisi GÜVENe göre, kullanılabilir, bence. Kız da fena değil. Takabeg (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ahhahhahah :))) Kim Kardashian'a benzettim ben de :) Makalede dediğin gibi bir sıkıntı göremedim ben. Yine de site sana tanıdık gelir, aman ha dersin diye bir danışayım dedim. Kaliteli makaleler var yalnız.--Rapsar (talk) 13:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
2015'te PD olacak. Takabeg (talk) 02:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Birincisi Bursa Ulu Camii, ikincisini tanıyamadım. Takabeg (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

re:Nanking Massacre edit

Please do not abuse the term NPOV. NPOV does not mean to eliminate any point of views. And I don't think the naming "Japanese committed atrocities in Nanjing massacre" implies any point of views. It simply states a fact which is endorsed by postwar military tribunals. --MtBell (talk) 21:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Though 长谷川's role in Nanjing Massacre is not mentioned in a wikipedia article, it does'nt spare his guilt. According to postwar memoirs by Japanese officers, his fleet killed tens of thousand civilians and unarmed soldiers who was then crossing the Yangtze River. --MtBell (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please remember that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Though 长谷川's role in Nanjing Massacre is not mentioned in a wikipedia article, it does'nt spare his guilt. According to postwar memoirs by Japanese officers, his fleet killed tens of thousand civilians and unarmed soldiers who was then crossing the Yangtze River. --MtBell (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is not a reliable source, but Wikipedia is not field for propagandas. First of all, you have to edit articles of wikipedias (English, Chinese, Japanese etc...), and then shall we solve disputes in Commons. And do you know notable survivors of the Nanking Massacre ? I'm planning to create sub categories (participants, survivors, researchers etc.. ) of People associated with the Nanjing Massacre. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well, I am the major contributor to the Chinese article on Nanjing Massacre. So I am surely qualified for the discussion. But could you also, as what you have demanded me, show me your contribution in any related articles, in English, Chinese or Japanese, to prove you are also qualified to talk on this controversial topic. --MtBell (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I changed the category under the name "Japanese related to atrocities in Nanjing Massacre". This is my final position. If you have any question about the role of these Japanese in the massacre, please leave me a message and I will show you the literature. --MtBell (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Japanese related to atrocities in Nanjing Massacre". is too POV-pushing name. As you know, even in Chinese Wikipedia, Participants to the Nanking Massacre is used. Please stop POV-pushing categorization. Please !Takabeg (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
If you consider "Japanese who participated in Nanjing Massacre" as appropriate, this name also looks fine to me. But I have to reject being criticized as a propaganda-purposed editor. I hope you can read the Chinese article zh:南京大屠杀 which provides more sources and details than any other versions in the entire WP, not even to mention the ja version in which any photo showing Japanese atrocities is rejected. --MtBell (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry but I can accept neither Chinese national POV nor Japanese national POV. Takabeg (talk) 21:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am really disappointed to see that you insist starting an editing war. What a shame. --MtBell (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

New sections edit

Hi Takabeg. If you add a new section, please ensure that the edit summary is not bogus as in this example. Even just removing the section link (of the section above) in the edit summary is better than leaving as is. --Leyo 09:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Taşlı Köprü ? edit

Selam Rapsar. File talk:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg hakkında bilgin veya görüşün var mı ? 03:06, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Selam. Benim bilgim yok, kullanımına da rastlayamadım.--Rapsar (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please, come here to solve this question. Current name is obviously wrong, and i would love to close this question. --WhiteWriter speaks 14:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Japanese war crimes edit

There is a discussion that involves you at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Japanese war crimes pictures. SpinningSpark 16:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

You can use talk pages. Takabeg (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Then perhaps you wouldn't mind if all your controversial edits were reverted while it is discussed? SpinningSpark 18:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand why you feel my edits "controversial". You can explain your point of view at talk pages. Takabeg (talk) 18:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Selamlar. File:Ahmet Ustel.jpg ile ilgilenebilir misin?--Rapsar (talk) 16:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ve aleyküm. sinematurk.comda bulunuyor ama daha küçük... Takabeg (talk) 02:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Photos taken during the Second Sino-Japanese War edit

I noticed that you have tagged "no source" to many photos of the war and these photos would be deleted quite soon. I am reverting all you speedy deletion requests to these photos.

Please be aware that any photo, either taken by Chinese or Japanese, during the war which ended in 1945 is public domain according to the copyright laws of China and Japan. Unless you have proofs showing that the copyright has not expired and is holding by another nationality, please DO NOT start any speedy deletion request, because most of them are clearly public domain. Please be very cautious with these historical photos which are widely used accross various Wikipedia projects. --MtBell (talk) 10:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

They are not speedy deletion. It's very cleat that there are no sources for images. As long as I know, administrators will give users time. If you (and/or I, other users) can provide sources, they will not be deleted. Note: {{PD-China}} doesn't cover photos personally taken before 1945. In any cases, sources have to be provided. Takabeg (talk) 10:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Your requests lead to speedy deletion. The China copyright law guarantees all anonymous photos in public domain 50 years after their creation. If you can't provide the author's name and a publication date which is later than 1946, it is fair to assume its copyright expired. --MtBell (talk) 10:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Even if we claim that photos are anonymous work, we need original sources. Do you understand ? Anyway I don't think admins delete them speedily. When nobody cannot provide sources for them, they cannot become permanent. Unless nobody provide original sources, other users will delete them in the near future. P.S. Please stop personal attack like this. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 11:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Does it bother you if I share the same opinion with another user? Blocking others' mouths is more dangerous than blocking a river. Look at what you have done first. --MtBell (talk) 15:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Probably you don't know Comment on content, not on the contributor. I strongly recommend you to learn rules and spirit of Wikimedia. Cheers. Takabeg (talk) 22:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to hear that you've talked of "random links". Could you explain if your uploads are from "random links" or original publication:

--MtBell (talk) 22:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

We cannot call them random links. Because I took images from those links. And {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} is valid to both images. I personally think {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} is problematic tag, because copyrights of most of them are accepted abroad. But this tag is convenient for commons users at present. In any cases, {{PD-China}} is different from {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. When the image was taken before 1946 by Japanese photographer, to use {{PD-Japan}}, we have to prove the date of creation of that image. On the other hand, we have to prove the date of publication to use {{PD-China}}. Do you understand ? Takabeg (talk) 23:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Mr Takabeg, now it is clear that you are quite familiar with {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} and you began to use this tag long ago. Why did you nominate Deletion requests/File:Bodies of Chinese massacred and burned by Japanese troops in Nanjing (Murase Moriyasa's photo).jpg for deletion in the name of "copyvio" and pretend unfamiliar with that tag? I would not say you are playing double standands but I am informing you that I will not discuss with a dishonest person in the talk page any more. If you want to challenge the copyright status of those PD-China photos, just go and start a deletion request with your "proofs", and we will meet there. --MtBell (talk) 01:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dosyalarda Azerbayacan / Dağlık Karabağ sınıflandırılmaları edit

Siz de tarafsız değilsiniz. Anlaşılan, siz de Ermeni milliyetçliği yapıyorsunuz. Peki dosyaların düzeltilmesini, niye "maalesef" olarak algılıyorsunuz?

Niye tarafsız olmadığımı iddia ediyorsun ki. Dağlık Karabağ Cumhuriyeti'nin olsun, Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti'nin olsun, sonuçta iki POV için Nagorno-Karabakh geçerlidir. Yaptığın işinin taraflılığını ve yaptığım işimin tarafsızlığını anlayabildin mi ? Takabeg (talk) 07:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: edit

Replied on mine. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs 14:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've requested a file merger for "Japanese Naval Landing Force, waiting for attack order with wearing a gas mask.jpg", since both images are pretty much the same. There isn't a need for two separate files on Commons, and your version has better quality, so we will keep the image you have uploaded, and replace the older image which is of lower quality. If you do have anything to ask, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or on the file talkpage. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs 07:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Selamlar edit

Selamlar ve iyi bayramlar Takabeg. Category:Sabahın Bereketi ve Category:Gül FM sorunlu gibi, ilgilenebilir misin müsait olduğunda?--Rapsar (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Daha önceden yayımlanmışsa, benim bildiğim kadarıyla da OTRS izni gerekiyor.--Rapsar (talk) 07:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces in Battle of Shanghai 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

İzmir Suikastı edit

Selamlar. Bu madde üzerindeki çalışma tamamlandı ve kaliteli madde adayı gösterdim. Bir inceleyip, fikir belirtebilir misin vaktin varsa?--Rapsar (talk) 09:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Kirk Kerkorian.jpg edit

I wonder what's unclear about its copyright? The photo is from 1977 and there is no known copyright to it. --Yerevanci (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Administrators will control the image. Takabeg (talk) 03:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, thank you, that answered my question. --Yerevanci (talk) 03:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

OTRS edit

Takabeg merhaba, umarım keyifler yerindedir. İtalyanca vikipedi'de pek çok gökcisminin fotoğrafları için (wikisky) izinler alınmış (OTRS kaydı yapılmış) ve sayfalarında kullanmaktalar. Ancak bu fotoğraflar wikimedia commons'ta yer almıyor!! Dolayısıyla doğrudan kullanamıyorum. Aynı OTRS numarasıyla bizim de kullanabilme olasılığımız var mıdır? Örnek için buraya bakabilirsin. Saygılar, görüşmek üzere. --CRea80 (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ve aleyküm selam. Diğer wikiprojelerde kullanılan OTRS doğrudan doğruya Commonsta da geçerlidir. Ancak gösterdiğiniz örnekte yer alan it:Template:Copyright Wikisky 'e baktığım kadarıyla Il permesso non include l'uso dell'immagine da parte di terzi, neanche per scopi non commerciali. yani sadece Wikipediyaya izin verildiği, gayri-ticari amaçlı olsa bile üçüncü şahıs tarafından kullanılmasına izin verilediği belirtiliyor. Dolayısıyla it:Template:Copyright Wikisky ile İtalyanca Wikipediyasına yüklenmiş olan dosyaların buraya taşınması mümkün değildir. Ama anladığım kadarıyla yerel wiki projelerine (İngilizce Wikipedia olsun, Türkçe olsun...) aktarabilirsiniz. İyi çalışmalar. Takabeg (talk) 23:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Teşekkürler. İyi çalışmalar. --CRea80 (talk) 07:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Takabeg. You have new messages at File talk:Jandarma Türkiye Gendarmerie Turkey logo.png#OTRS.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Unutmadan sorayım istedim edit

İzleme listenize almamış olabileceğinizi düşündüğümden; burada ve burada oy kullandım ve gerekçeleri belirttim. Bu konuda, size binlerce örnek dosya verebileceğimi bildiğiniz halde tavırlarınızı ve sizi anlamakta güçlük çekiyorum. İncelemeelemani yani beni tamamen kişisel bir mesele haline getirdiğinizi görüyorum ve buna üzülüyorum. Bu nedenle size de haber vermek istedim. --i.е. v-mail 04:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Birde şunu gördüm. (Reality'nin tezi) veya buradaki ücretsiz logoları yüklesem? --i.е. v-mail 05:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

TSK ve DzKK edit

Taka merhaba,

Galiba bir sıkıntımız var. Mümkünse bizim köy çeşmesine bakar mısın? White Cat'in bir takım şüpheleri var, OTRS etiketinin hiçbir işe yaramadığını ve resimlerin Commons'dan silinebileceğini belirtiyor. Açıkçası benim de içime kurt düştü. Lisans konusunda benden daha çok bilgilisin, ne düşünüyorsun?

Görüşürüz.

--Bermanya (talk) 11:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ve aleyküm selam. Aslında Commons'taki dosyaların kalıp kalmaması yerel Vikipedilerdeki tartışmalardan etkilenmiyor. Mesela En Wikide de bazen Commons'ta yer alan dosyalar üzerinde tartışmalar yaşanıyor. Ancak En Wikinin maddelerinde kullanılıp kullanılması kadar verileiblir, ama onun ötesi burada konuşulmalı. Commons'ta da Commons:Köy çeşmesi var. Eğer koşullar Commons'a uygun değilse (kanımca, ticari kullanımına açık olan Wiki projelerindeki kullanılmasına verilen izinde ayreten ticari kullanımına açıktır ya da kapalıdır diye belirtilmesi gereksiz) ve OTRS izinlerine bakabilenler olmaz derlerse hepsi silinmeli. Gerç Beyaz Kedi burada kalsın demiş. Sonradan mı şüphelemeye başladı ? Takabeg (talk) 06:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Taksim Kışlası edit

İlgili içerik ve fotoğraf için özel olarak konulmayan bir uyarının Taksim Kışlası fotoğrafını bağlamadığını düşünüyorum. Fotoğrafın çekim tarihi dolayısıyla telif hakkının olmadığını görüp kullanmış olma ihtimalleri yüksek. Fotoğrafın kim tarafından çekildiğini de bilmediğimden Witt'in eserin günümüzdeki telif sahibi olup olmadığını net olarak öğrenmek için iletişim kurmak gerekiyor. İçerik İngilizce ve benim İngilizcem yetersiz, sen sorar mısın? --Cobija (talk) 13:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:SevresSignatories.jpg edit

Hello Takabeg,

What do you think about this edit? Geagea (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Adil kullanım edit

Selamlar,

Birkaç hafta önce sana mesaj atmıştım ancak cevabını benim mesaj sayfama değil de kendi mesaj sayfana eklediğin için tesadüfen görmüş oldum. Mesaj sayfan izleme listemde olmadığı için mesaj sayfama uğramanı tavsiye ediyorum. TSK'nın tüm fotoğrafları siliniyor, ayrıca Türkçe Vikipedi'de bütün adil kullanım dosyalarının silinmesi kuvvetli ihtimal.

Yasaların bu açıkları sebebiyle Vikipedi'nin büyük bir darbe yemesi ne acı.

Görüşürüz.

--Bermanya (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

TSK'dan ticari kullanıma, türevlere ve serbest dağıtıma izin veren (özgür lisans kriterlerine uyan) bir şekilde dosyaların kullanımına izin vermesi için yapılacak müracaatta kullanılabilecek metnin oluşturulabilmesi için Türkçe Vikipedi'de bir alt başlık açtım. Buraya katkıda bulunabilirsiniz memnuniyet duyarım. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 16:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Nasılsınız? edit

Verdiğiniz ara biraz uzun oldu galiba. -Esc2003 (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply


2014 ! edit

  * * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sapka inkilabi edit

Takabeg, Türkiye ilgili fotograflari yüklediginiz icin tesekkürler. Sapka inkilabini gösteren bir resim yükleyebilirmisiniz acaba? Bu cok güzel: [3], veya her hangi halk evin önündeki sapkali insanlar, bunun gibi [4]. Önemlisi, yolda sapka giyen normal insanlar olsun, sapkali Mustafa Kemal Pasadan var bir sürü. Alman "Sapka inkilabi" makalesine yerlestirmek istiyorum. Varsa sevinirim. Selamlar --Zoylab (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Political_parties_in_the_Russian_Empire edit

 

Political parties in the Russian Empire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Etnik edit

Selam. Müsait olduğunuzda bir süreliğine uğrayıp tartışmaya katılabilir misiniz? --Esc2003 (talk) 11:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Sabiha Gokcen with flight cap.jpg edit

 
File:Sabiha Gokcen with flight cap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 19:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Ataturk and Gokcen at Metris.jpg edit

 
File:Ataturk and Gokcen at Metris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Ataturk Elazig 1937.jpg edit

 
File:Ataturk Elazig 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Proudbolsahye (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Sabiha Gokcen with coat.jpg edit

 
File:Sabiha Gokcen with coat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Proudbolsahye (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Kemal Aydın edit

Günaydın Takabeg, Aşağıda linkini verdiğim Kemal Aydın galerisindeki resimler 50'li yıllarda çekilmiş. Çeken bilinmiyor; fakat Kemal Aydın, o zamanki spor fotoğrafçılarının gazete için çektikleri resimler dışında, sporcuların da resimlerini çektiklerini ve bunları o sporculara genelde parayla sattıklarını söylüyor. Bu resimlerin çoğunu satın aldığını iddia ediyor. Bu resimleri, bu argümanla, hangi lisanslama ile koruyabiliriz. Bana yardımcı olursan, sevinirim.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Kemal_Ayd%C4%B1n?uselang=tr Sevgiler--Gemalmaz ileti 05:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Salih Omurtak.jpg edit

 
File:Salih Omurtak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Btmpnr01 (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Mustafa Kemal and Fikriye.jpg edit

 
File:Mustafa Kemal and Fikriye.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mavrikant (talk) 13:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Soma resimleri edit

Selam, Sayın Mustafa Karaman ?, Eğer Soma fotoğrafları kendi çalışmanız ise cc-by-3.0 uygunsuz lisansıdır. Takabeg (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Selam. Resimleri ben değil, kardeşim(Mustafa Karaman) çekti. Onun adının yer alacaği şekilde örnek bir resmi düzenleyebilirseniz sevinirim. Eğer böyle birşey mümkün değil ise kendim çekmiş gibi de düzeleneyebilirim. Rukiye ile ilgili olarak Türkçe Vikipedi'ye mesaj bıraktım. Teşekkürler. --Mavrikant (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hmm. O zaman {{Own work}} değil. OTRS yoluna başvurmanızı tavsiye ederim. Çünkü aksi halde her an silinebilirler. User:Taysin yardımcı olacaktır. Takabeg (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Bi de Mustafa Kemal'in yanındaki bayanın Rukiye olduğunu nereden çıkardınız ? Bildiğiniz gibi Yeni Şafak gazetesi Fikriye olarak gösteriyor ve Külür Bakanlığı'nın sitesi ise o bayanın kimliğinden bahsetmiyor. Ayrıca oradaki bayanın başı açık değil. Eğer gerçekten 1926 yılında çekildiyse Mustafa Kemal'in yakınının kapalı olması tuhaf. Takabeg (talk) 16:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Tarihçi bir arkadaşım resimdeki kişinin herkes tarafından Fikriye hanım zannedildiğini fakat, aslında Rukiye hanım olduğunu söyledi. Resmin tarihi itibariyle kişinin Fikriye hanım olamayacaği ortada. Rukiye hanım olduğunu benzerlik dışında iddia edemem. --Mavrikant (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sonuçta yalan söyleyerek bir şeyi yaptırmak faydasız ve zararlıdır. Mesela Musti offinsive değil. In short please don't tell a lie. Takabeg (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Original caption edit

The photo "Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces in Battle of Shanghai 1937.jpg" was taken by unknown photographer and does not actually have the original caption; it was the author of the book who added the caption for his book. The photo has been used in many places with added captions; I therefore use the description from the current version of the photo on Wikimedia Commons. STSC (talk)

The photo was taken by a Japanese photographer to be published by the Japanese Navy (probably for war propaganda). So we have to keep original caption. Probably you want to use this image to prove the usage of chemical weapon by Japanese Army during the Battle of Shanghai. But unfortunately this image is irrelevant of chemical attacks. As long as I understand, both China and Japan had chemical weapons and both sides used it in the Secpmd Somp-Japanese War. I read a document that says the Shanghai Naval Landing Force had chemical weapons in 1945. However I couln't find any documents and any reliable sources that says this unit had it during the Battle of Shanghai. In the Battle of Shanghai, both side had information that their enemies (China and Japan) had chemical weapon. So Chinese side send the Student Coprs of the Chemical Shool to Shanghai, Japanese side also used gas masks. As you know, the Shanghai Naval Landing Force was the garrison of Shanghai International Settlement and their primary duty was the defence of Shanghai International Settlement, where were densely inhabited area. The Chinise officials and Chinese amateur webcites created and are creating forged caption and pasted and are pasting them to published Japanese photographs, and their forgeries were reveled. They lost faces and people start thinking that even the usage of chemical weapon might be forgery. It's dangerous. We have to prove some event not by forged caption but with document and reliable sources. In conclusion, your cheating actions are harmful not only for readers of Wikipedia but also for history. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
You should AGF, and I don't want to get into any political argument. I would be happy to keep the original caption if any; the main point is: Can you prove which is the original caption on the photo? STSC (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry but I don't have any political argument. I've control small part of your contribution, and found this action on the article en:Comfort women in English Wikipedia. It dawned on me that your purpose is not creating encyclopedia, but spreading propaganda for your own nationalistic POV. I highly recommend you to read en:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion Takabeg (talk) 04:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

COM:AN/U edit

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

STSC (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Could you please take a look at my comment at the bottom of [5] and indicate if you agree? whym (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
ja:User talk:Whymはコモンズの話題には不適切ですので、コモンズの適切なページで議論にご参加またはご提起いただけないでしょうか。伝言板のページではTakabegさんのお返事を待っているうちに自動で過去ログ化されましたが、カットアンドペーストで戻して続けてくださってもいいと私は思います。カテゴリの名称を議論する場としてはCommons:Categories for discussionなどがあります。なお、日本語のほうがよろしければ、コモンズのどのページの議論にも日本語で参加してくださってけっこうだと思います。日本語の資料を検討する場合は、日本語で議論する人を受け入れるほうが合理的でもあると私は思いますし、そうした参加は私の知るかぎり否定されていません。 --whym (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Parallel categorization edit

Thx for the note. I've posted an explanation as to why parallel listing is helpful. See Category talk:Donghuamen Incident ContinentalAve (talk) 22:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disputed maps tag edit

Hello Takabeg,

Could you please define what is dispute in the two files above. It is not very clear in the talk page. -- Geagea (talk) 13:17, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays! 2015! edit

  * * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 20:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)  Reply

Rukiye Erkin edit

Şuradaki tartışmaya bakabilir misin? --Mavrikant (talk) 23:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Long_War edit

 

Long War has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 05:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:AbdurrahimTuncak.jpg edit

 
File:AbdurrahimTuncak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mavrikant (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The dispute over this file's description page is discussed at COM:ANU. Thanks. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 23:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Head up on some information edit

The administrator who has started Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#File:Japanese_Special_Naval_Landing_Forces_in_Battle_of_Shanghai_1937.jpg (とある白い猫) has stated on IRC in #wikimedia-commons in relation to that discussion:

I want to stab someone

This administrator has been very vocal on conduct on IRC -- he claims that saying "bullshit" is harassment, but he obviously doesn't have the same thought of expressing to an open channel that he wishes to stab someone.

I am not getting involved in the nexus of that dispute at AN/U, but neither should this editor/admin. From here on out he should see himself as unnecessarily involved and should no longer use the tools in relation to you, or that file, given his "I want to stab someone" inflammatory commentary. 85.234.150.42 23:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JarektBot (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Yavuz Sultan Selim, Midilli from the German airship SL 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 10:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Yavuz in Malta 1936.jpg edit

 
File:Yavuz in Malta 1936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andy Dingley (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Casles_in_Bitlis_Province edit

 

Category:Casles_in_Bitlis_Province has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


BethNaught (talk) 08:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Kurdistan newspaper.gif edit

 
File:Kurdistan newspaper.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rapsar (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! *** edit

  * * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Belkıs Şevket Hanım edit

Belkıs Şevket Hanım'ın artık fotoğrafı var, Teşekkürler. :) --Basak (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Elinize sağlık. Teşekkür ederiz. Takabeg (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

{{pd-turkey}} edit

Merhaba Takabeg. şuradaki konu hakkında şu sayfadaki görüşmeden, sözkonusu fotoğrafları {{PD-Turkey}} etiketi ile etiketlememizde sakınca olmadığı sonucunu çıkarmalı mıyım?--Basak (talk) 08:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Selam User:Basak. Kanımca {{PD-Ottoman Empire}} olabilir. Yine de "Tarih: Bilinmeyen zaman" olunca bu iş zor. Ama "copyright notice, registration, and deposit" gibi bilgilerin yazılı olmadığı için gerçekten Osmanlı döneminde yayımladıysa pre-1923 diye yazılması yeterlidir. Takabeg (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Belkis Shevket Hanoum edit

Bu fotoğrafın, çerçeveleme açısından, aslı budur helhalde. Birde daha net version da varmış. Originalini bulabilir misiniz ? Takabeg (talk) 10:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Selamlar. Bu fotoğrafın Şehbal Dergisi'nde yayımlandığını anlıyorum. Şurada Şehbal dergilerini buldum. 49-99. sayılara hızlıca göz attım, gözüme çarpmadı. Burada bulup ekran görüntüsü vs. alırsam işe yarar mı?--Basak (talk) 14:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Çi-Çi edit

Selamlar. Bu kişi kimdir, hükümdar mıdır kardeşi midir? Kayda değer midir? Dil bağlantıları var mıdır?--Rapsar (talk) 15:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Rapsar. Ve aleyküm. Bu zat. Yani hükümdar ve KD. Takabeg (talk) 02:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Milli Olan Her Şey Bizimdir.jpg edit

 
File:Milli Olan Her Şey Bizimdir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ceroles (talk) 23:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dereckson (talk) 02:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kaynaksız edit

Selam Takabeg, görüşmeyeli uzun zaman oldu. Umarım iyisindir. Sana bir sorum olacaktı: Şu fotoğraf için hiçbir kaynak bulunmamaktadır; ancak maddede bu fotoğraf sanki bir kanıtmış gibi eklenmiş. Propaganda maksadıyla eklendiği anlaşılıyor ve sorumluca bir davranış değil doğrusu. --Esc2003 (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 10:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:BulentAlpkaya.jpg edit

 
File:BulentAlpkaya.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Kumkum (talk) 19:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:MuratBilgel (winter).jpg edit

 
File:MuratBilgel (winter).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Kumkum (talk) 19:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Kurtcebe Noyan.jpg edit

 
File:Kurtcebe Noyan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Kumkum (talk) 11:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Cumhuriyet - Refah.jpg edit

 
File:Cumhuriyet - Refah.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Kumkum (talk) 11:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Kumkum (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

a question edit

Hi. Şuna bakar mısın aktifsen?--Rapsar (talk) 21:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Agricultural_Bank_of_Turkey edit

 

Agricultural Bank of Turkey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Atomic cloud over Hiroshima (from Matsuyama).jpg edit

 
File:Atomic cloud over Hiroshima (from Matsuyama).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Boundarylayer (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays! 2017! ;) edit

  * * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)   Reply

Category:People_executed_by_Turkey edit

 

People executed by Turkey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 12:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Vikipedi'de yeniden aktif olmanız dileğiyle... edit

Merhaba Takabeg,

Öncelikle size geç kalmış da olsa bir özür borcum var: İmzanızı taklit eden bir vandal yüzünden sizi suçladım ve belki de Vikipedi'ye "küsmenize" sebep olanlardan biri benim. Yeni bir kullanıcı olmama vermenizi ve geçmişteki nobranlığımı affetmenizi diliyorum. Kaliteli katkılarınızla sizi tekrar Vikipedi'de görmeyi isteyen tek kullanıcının ben olduğumu da sanmıyorum. Yeniden aktif olmanız dileğiyle, sevgiler, Hannahannah (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Safiye Ali.jpg edit

 
File:Safiye Ali.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Janissary_marching_band edit

 

Janissary marching band has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Liakat_Medal edit

 

Liakat Medal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 14:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ankara_Intercity_Bus_Terminal edit

 

Ankara Intercity Bus Terminal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 13:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Kazuo Sakamaki.jpg edit

 
File:Kazuo Sakamaki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

fourthords | =Λ= | 17:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays! 2018! ;) edit

    * Happy Holidays 2018, Takabeg! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   Reply

Category:People_by_occupation_by_language edit

 

Category:People_by_occupation_by_language has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 07:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Turkish soldiers with a head cut off.jpg edit

 
File:Turkish soldiers with a head cut off.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 13:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Turkish_people_by_ethnic_or_national_origin edit

 

Turkish people by ethnic or national origin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 10:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:History_of_the_Republic_of_Turkey edit

 

History of the Republic of Turkey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Alişan Bey & Cemal Bey.jpg edit

 
File:Alişan Bey & Cemal Bey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 15:06, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Hasan Hayri Bey.JPG edit

 
File:Hasan Hayri Bey.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 20:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Poets_in_Persian edit

 

Poets in Persian has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 14:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Mehmed Nedjati Bey.jpg edit

 
File:Mehmed Nedjati Bey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 03:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Greek girls celebrating the occupation of Smyrna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 19:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Reşat Nuri Bey Güntekin.jpg edit

 
File:Reşat Nuri Bey Güntekin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 13:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Admin's Barnstar
Selamlar hocam ben burda yeniyim fakat bir makale ekleyim dedim

Hata: Otomatik olarak bu işlemin zararlı olduğu belirlendi ve izin verilmedi. İşleminizin yapıcı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız, lütfen ne yapmaya çalıştığınız konusunda bir hizmetliye bilgi verin. İşleminizin eşleştiği kötüye kullanım kuralının kısa bir açıklaması: Vandalizm

Bu mesaj çıktı ne demek ne yapmam lazım ki? nasıl değişiklik yada makale ekleyebilirim yardımcı olurmusun. Canlidj (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ali_Kemal_Bey edit

 

Ali Kemal Bey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A02:908:D83:E460:216:CBFF:FEAD:FF9 18:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


Category:General Directors of the Kwantung Bureau edit

 

Category:General Directors of the Kwantung Bureau has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


庚寅五月 (talk) 13:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Occupation_of_Istanbul edit

 

Occupation of Istanbul has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 23:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ottoman_Istanbul edit

 

Ottoman Istanbul has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 09:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vilayet_of_Istanbul edit

 

Vilayet of Istanbul has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 06:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Template:Attribution-TRGov-Military-Navy edit

 
Template:Attribution-TRGov-Military-Navy has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Uncitoyen (talk) 12:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Turkish_people_of_Kurdish_descent edit

 

Turkish people of Kurdish descent has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Balyozxane (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kurdish_musicians edit

 

Kurdish musicians has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 01:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Nemesis misak torlakian.jpg edit

 
File:Nemesis misak torlakian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Sinking of Battleship Bouvet at the Dardanelles-Tahsin Bey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nanahuatl (talk) 07:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Russo-Japanese War Shunga.jpg edit

 
File:Russo-Japanese War Shunga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stang 12:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Ottoman destroyer Basra.jpg edit

 
File:Ottoman destroyer Basra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Samsun class destroyer alongside Yavuz.jpg edit

 
File:Samsun class destroyer alongside Yavuz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Samsun class destroyers at Izmir, Turkey - 1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Turkish destroyer Samsun.jpg edit

 
File:Turkish destroyer Samsun.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:ئەی ڕەقیب - تاكا بك.ogg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ئەی ڕەقیب - تاكا بك.ogg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Cactus Ronin (talk) 02:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Felix QW (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply