User talk:Ulamm/Archive 2007–2017

– For younger correspondences see User talk:Ulamm –

Welcome to the Commons, Ulamm/Archive 2007–2017!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 20:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

---

Hallo wikian fellows, your message is probably read earlier by me, if you write it in my talk page in de.wiki .

---

Image:Oksywie Wielbark Przeworsk.gif

Hello! Could you please tell me what is the green color on that map??? I would be thankful for your response!

The green colour marks lowland, below 10 meters above sea level. The sand colour marks elevated areas, mostly glacial moraines.--Ulamm (talk) 22:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Eindachhof_Slowenien.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eindachhof_Slowenien.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 20:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Gelbstich in Image:Weserradweg b Oedelsheim.jpg

Hallo Ulamm, ich hatte vor ein paar Wochen mal den Magentastich aus diesem Foto entfernt siehe hier. Ich sehe gerade, dass du inzwischen zweimal eine Version mit starkem Gelbstich drübergeladen hast. Das wirkt ein bisschen wie ein Versehen, oder wie ist das? Gruß, Wikipeder 22:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Weschnitz Odenwald.gif

Hallo! Es gibt einen Kommentar auf de:Bild Diskussion:Weschnitz Odenwald.gif zu diesem Bild. --Ahellwig 12:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Maps of African states

Thanks for comments! de:User:Captain Blood made several topographic maps - mostly for large or European countries - but much is still missing. He does not seems to be active anymore.

You are quite right that the maps are too dark... I have been working with my laptop, which tends to distort the colours and brightness quite badly. Luckily it is easy to recreate the maps.

I think I will keep the current maps clean and without labels, but I could make another set with labels. Presumably this is something you had in mind: [1]? In principle it should be in SVG format, but until I can easily convert postscript files directly into svg, I'll stick with png. It should also be easy to change the labels into different languages, but I need to finish the english set before even thinking about it. – Sadalmelik 17:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi, for your information: I have changed the deletion request on your drawing with the wrong name to {{duplicate|Image:SamarraGreatMinaretDrawn.gif}} as you uploaded the same file with a different name. {{delete}} is the normal deletion process on commons, and in this case {{badname}} or {{duplicate}} is better. See also Commons:Deletion guidelines for more info. Kind regards, Deadstar 13:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Polska 960 - 992.png

Czy mógłbyś sprecyzować o co chodzi i to najlepiej po polsku. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak 18:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nigerkongosprecher.png

I have deleted the page "Show Image:Nigerkongosprecher.png", and have replaced it with Image:Nigerkongosprecher.png|700px at the bottom of the image page itself. I think it is clearer that way, as people can see it without having to click to another page. Can you mention where you got the data from to draw the diagram? Kind regards, Deadstar (msg) 11:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I took the data from de:Niger-Kongo-Sprachen and related articles in German WP.--Ulamm 18:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Category:Farms in Germany

Image deletion warning

Category:Farms in Germany has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

(Fixed your request. Category is still in use + are generally not deleted, but redirected. Please add your comments in the request.)--Deadstar (msg) 14:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Leiza_NW-Navarra.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 01:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help. Thank you for your warning, Siebrand! I forgot it, preparing my target article, parallelly.--Ulamm 01:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Wenzel III rex Bohemiae et Hungariae

Salve Ulricus Agnus,

I have found something in somewhere there http://www.corvina.oszk.hu/. But I have noticed that the digitalized sources aren`t shared no more ... Mathiasrex 01:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Farms by country

As you might have noticed on Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Farms by country, your systematic deletion requests for farms to be systematically replaced by farmhouses does not encounter a massive enthusiasm. It might be a better idea to bring that up for discussion on Commons:Categories_for_discussion before a category war starts. --Foroa 07:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:Cfd

Hi, you might not have noticed, but you are editing {{Cfd}}, instead of creating a discussion request. I will create the request now, but in the future, please try to follow the steps on COM:CFD --rimshot^talk 14:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

I beg your pardon: I tried it, but I did not succeed. I almost don't know stylesheets. So I didn't know, what I hat to sbstitute with insertions, and what I wasn't allowed to touch.--Ulamm 14:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Hallo nochmal, ich hab die Diskussion jetzt erstellt (hier). Hast du denn versucht den Schritten zu folgen? Ich weiss, es ist nicht ganz einfach, aber die Prozedur ist auch nicht so leicht zu beschreiben :) --rimshot^talk 14:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Danke, ich hab's gesehen. Vielleicht erstellt ja mal ein Profi ein Formular mit Feldern zum Eintragen.--Ulamm 14:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ordensstaat 1455.PNG

Die Städtenamen in Image:Ordensstaat 1455.PNG sind reichlich daneben. Bei unserem Freund "Weltraumkadett" ist größte Vorsicht geboten, man muß dessen weiß-rote Meinung nicht auch noch weiterverbreiten. --Matthead 21:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Matthead, ich hatte ihn selber schon mal deswegen kritisch angeschrieben, leider ohne Erfolg.

So ganz POV-frei ist natürlich auch die deutsche Karte von 1905 nicht, deren Ausschnitt ich nachkoloriert habe, damit man die Bistümer auch findet: Das eine ist der Titel "Deutsche Herrschaft …". Das andere ist der Landesname Masowien. Wenn sich die Teilherzogtümer nicht 1410 schon wieder zu einem Polen vereinigt gehabt hätten, wäre die Schlacht von Tannenberg wohl anders ausgegangen.--Ulamm 23:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:POL Czersk Maz COA.jpg

Sorry, you are wright but usually I mark the heraldic images with the wide category Coats of arms to be classified because I'm not able to verify all the images of the day in a time not exceeding two hours, so I use only the above string. I will try to be more correct. Bye Massimop 21:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Donostia/Santander????!!!!

Donostia/Santander????!!!! Is "Donostia/San Sebastián". Santander is the capital of Cantabria!! Thank you for reminding me. Ulamm 21:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Basque Country location.png

Do you have this file in a .svg version ? I'd like to make a map of Landes of Gascony from yours. Thanks Larrousiney 19:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

No I have none. My graphic program has a function "vectorize", but that doesn't reduce the data volume. So I don't use it.--Ulamm 23:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Oresund-de new.png

Ich habe Dir mal bei mir zu Hause geantwortet. Bitte antworte dort. Gruß Masturbius 00:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Khami ruins (ZW).jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mitropoleos.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Mitropoleos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Tarawneh 04:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hessen phys Karte.png

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Stop

It looks to me you don't quite grasp the logic of categorization and you are moving around things without any knowledge on the subjects ! Different users have expressed opposition against your actions and different users have undone your actions since 2007-11. Advice: stick to the things you understand and when many people express their concerns regarding your actions, that should ring a bell you're on the wrong trail !--GogolMaps 00:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

If User:LimoWreck denies huge differences between aristocrate and peasant architecture in Belgium, I need some time to collect facts. But his removal of items from "farmbuildings" to "farms" in Austria and Canada shows, that his motive is not better knowledge, but his personal objection against a more specific (sub-) categorization.--Ulamm 00:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Subcategorization should be an improvement. I honestly don't see any improvement in those specific images as well, on the contrary; so I fully support the people that have reverted you in various contries. Again, I suggest you accept their advice and comments, and better refrain from disorganizing Commons ! --GogolMaps 00:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

By the way, it seems to me not only your knowledge of the subject is bad, but it also seems your not a native English speaker and knowledge of English could be better? Because I've seen you using the word "Manor", which strictly speaking isn't directly linked with farming. So you can't just use it as a drop in replacement for any farm related category ! Again the advice: refrain from disorganizing Commons because it would be a shame you'd be blocked for it ! --GogolMaps 00:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Those were not several people from several countries. Those were LimoWreck and his companion Foroa, who moved images from cat:"farmhouse" or cat:"farm buildings" to cat:"farms" in Belgium, Austria, Canada and USA.--Ulamm 00:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't fool us. People from the US have had to restore your actions as of November, people from Portugal have come complaining about your edits even before those users appeared. Self reflection is a good thing. And for the last time: persisting in controversial unsupported edits and defamating Wikipedia (or Commons) are valid grounds for a block; so you're warned.--GogolMaps 01:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

• Don't talk to me in plural maiestatis.
• LimoWreck and Foroa opposed to my initiative, from the beginning. And obviously they did not accept, that the difference between farm and farmhouse was seen by several discutants.
• The histories of the images involved tell different things, than you tell.--Ulamm 02:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Please, from now on, concentrate the discussion on Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Destruction_of_specific_subcategories in stead of scattering it around on the many deletion and move requests. And indeed, when considering that almost none of your contributions have the "top" indication, meaning that they have been quickly changed or reverted, one should wonder if you are not wasting your time (and the time of many others). --Foroa 07:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

LimoWreck reverted, while I was working.--Ulamm 03:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

physikalische Karte von Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

Gibt es davon auch eine frei verfügbare Grundkarte mit weniger Eintragungen? --Chpagenkopf 06:54, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ich kann zunächst die in meinem Rechner vorliegende Version mit unvollständigen bzw. unvollständig korrigierten Gewässern ins Netz stellen.--Ulamm 11:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Die Grundkarte mit weniger Gewässerbezeichnungen und zugehörigen Zahlenangaben und nur den größten Orten wäre sicher auch für andere Zwecke interessant. Auf den ganz genauen Verlauf der Gewässer kommt es dabei sicher nicht an. Ich hatte mal ähnliches überlegt, aber der Aufwand dafür war mir doch zu groß. Alle Achtung für die Mühe, die Du Dir damit gemacht hast. Gruß, --Chpagenkopf 17:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hochgeladen habe ich meine Bearbeitungen jetzt schon vor ein paar Stunden, siehe de:WP:KW#SH, MV, SaxAn, Sax. Gruß, Ulamm 18:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Bei der Arbeit mit der Karte ist mir aufgefallen, dass in Rostock die Unterwarnow als Gewässer fehlt und deshalb die Oberwarnow fälschlicherweise entlang der A19 verläuft und am Hafen in den Breitling mündet. Die Geländekarte von Google enthält die Details recht genau, vielleicht kannst Du es noch einmal nachbessern. Gruß, --Chpagenkopf 19:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Ethnographic Iberia 200 BCE.PNG

Hello Ulamm and thank you for your comments! I'll write in English because at this early hour it's a bit difficult for me to get the Spanish spelling right...! Regarding your critiques:

1. The Lusitanians are clearly and without any sort of doubt Indo-European, they were most probably part of a migratory wave from Central Europe that predates the Celts by some time (how much? nobody seems to know and the Ora Maritima from Avienus only gives a mythological narrative). And in fact they could be described as Pre-Celts instead of Proto-Celts. Many, however, prefer the latter designation because the first one hides the connection found between the en:Lusitanian language and other Celtic languages. As far as we can tell, given the reduced amount of writing material left to us (3 inscriptions...), is that Lusitanian is not quite Celt namely because it present some archaic traits (such as not having lost the initial P, as in porc/um - pig, generally orc/us or something similar in other Celtic languages). Authors like Scarlat Lambrino did consider it a archaic variety of Celtic. But I could change the Proto-Celt designation, so as not to have controversy over details.
2. Your are probably quite right about the Aquitanian region - on that I am oblivious. I'll try to correct it.

Have you given a look at the source for my map (and the pdf version, with extensive and detailed information in Portuguese on the criteria used, as well as the long bibliography used to source the map)? I believe you may find it interesting. And if you write in Spanish you certainly can read Portuguese! See you soon. The Ogre 10:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Done some changes. Is it ok now? The Ogre 10:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

This way the map is o.k., I think. Up to now I had not the time to read your source. --Ulamm 17:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

My proposal for changes in Image:Celts in Europe.png (also see Image talk:Celts in Europe.png). What do you think? Cheers! The Ogre 20:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Mitropoleos.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mitropoleos.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -Nard 23:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Nottinghamshire

Hello,

Can you please revert to the old version of Nottinghamshire's map? The colours were selected via a process of consensus at the English Wikipedia. The whole of the UK use them. Jhamez84 15:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

You did so yourself. But you ought to keep my little improvements:

• Showing the course of river Trent, also where it is a border
• Showing motorways in another colour but blue.
  

And you ought to add another information which is much easier to get, if you live in Britain: A map that shows motorways should show railways, too. In my opinion that is a question of ecological responsibility.--Ulamm 04:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hamburger_Bhf_in_Venlo.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Hamburger_Bhf_in_Venlo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

LosHawlos 18:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gleiswechsel_bei_Avenwede.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Gleiswechsel_bei_Avenwede.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

LosHawlos 19:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hervest-Dorsten.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Hervest-Dorsten.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

LosHawlos 19:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Duelmen_Bahnhof.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Duelmen_Bahnhof.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

LosHawlos 19:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Harvest-Dorsten.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Harvest-Dorsten.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

LosHawlos 19:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Osnabrueck_Hbf.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Osnabrueck_Hbf.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

LosHawlos 19:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

All files derived from content from IEG-Maps

Image deletion warning

All files derived from content from IEG-Maps have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Ulamm!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Oberuckersee2Warnitz.jpg is uncategorized since 16 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Mariembourg loc.png is uncategorized since 3 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Ostpreußen Preußen DeutschesR1871-1918.gif is uncategorized since 13 April 2009.
• Image:SheltonLockbridge.JPG is uncategorized since 22 July 2009.
• Image:Grønlands Norge.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Gambia bea.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Noreg-Grønland.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Bergen loc01.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Nordseeroute V1see.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Grønlands–Noreg72c.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Nordseeroute2b.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Karsibór nowy.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Gambia b2.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:ALTMUEHL.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Noreg16-3.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Nordseeroute V01b.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Muenchen loc1.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Noreg-Grønland3.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Updating Niger-Congo languages

Hi!

Could you do a small update for your diagram on Niger-Congo languages? The number of speakers for East Mande should be nearer to 2 600 000 than 26 000 000, which is evident from the size of the bar, too. Thank you! Malhonen (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Actually, Kordofanian and Bantu should be updated, too. For the former 320 000 would be nearer to the truth than 32 000 000, and for the latter 210 000 000 rather than 21 000 000. Malhonen (talk) 21:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I do not know, how I entered those mistakes. In the German version, I wrote the correct figures. :) --Ulamm (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Äisch Léisbech Simmerschmelz.JPG

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 05:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Cycling infrastructure in Germany

Category discussion notification

Category:Cycling infrastructure in Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--ŠJů (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

File:East&southern africa early iron age.gif

Hello. I'm trying to find the original source image for File:East&southern africa early iron age.gif. The source on the page says "own painting in a PD map (wiki: States of Africa)", but I haven't been able to find it. Can you help? RockMFR (talk) 12:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

I used a map derived from File:BlankMap-World.png. --Ulamm (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Bergen borough maps deletion request

File:Bergen boroughs.png among other maps have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:Sprachenkarte Deutschland1880.png

File:Sprachenkarte Deutschland1880.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Edelseider (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fahrplan1848-49Oberschlesische Eisenbahn.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fahrplan1848-49Oberschlesische Eisenbahn.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Fahrplan1848-49Oberschlesische_Eisenbahn.png

File:Fahrplan1848-49Oberschlesische_Eisenbahn.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 21:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Wümmewiesen

Hallo Ulamm, kannst Du die Beschreibung und Kategorien von diesem Bild bitte noch etwas spezifizieren: File:Wuemmewiesen.jpg.

• Das Bild heißt Wümmewiesen im Text steht aber, dass es an der Weser aufgenommen wurde.
• Und: ist das Foto in Bremen oder Niedersachsen aufgenommen – oder genau an der Grenze? ;)

Gruß --Gepardenforellenfischer (talk) 10:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Regierungsbezirk Eger

I stumbled upon your map of the Regierungsbezirk Eger, and it was very well done! Do you have one for Aussig and Troppau? Perhaps even Austrian Silesia? --76.18.246.50 23:21, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

No, I haven't.--Ulamm (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Poltava Governornate Map.jpg

File:Poltava Governornate Map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julo (talk) 13:55, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Egerland1322-1806 RegBez Eger1939-1945.gif

File:Egerland1322-1806 RegBez Eger1939-1945.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

The same applies to File:Egerland1322-1806 RegbezEger1938-45.gif. --JuTa 20:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Chiavenna.png

And also:

• File:Sibirien topo2.png

Hi Ulamm. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 13:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Diagramme

Hallo Ulamm, versuche für Deine Skizzen Gnome Dia und Inkscape. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 00:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Franzius Unterweser 1407 px MediaWiki und Browser

Hallo Ulamm, MediaWiki, die Serversoftware stellt große Dateien auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite (z.B. File:Franzius Unterweser.jpg) kleiner dar, damit Bandbreite gespart werden kann und die Seite schneller lädt. Klickt man jedoch auf das Bild auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite, wird die Datei, die du hochgeladen hast, angezeigt oder zum Herunterladen angeboten (je nach Browsereinstellungen des Benutzers). Bei Bilddateien sind die meisten Browser aber so konfiguriert, dass die Datei im Browser angezeigt und nicht zum Heruntergeladen angeboten wird. Willst Du auf die Originaldatei verlinken, geht das mit Media: z.B. Media:Franzius Unterweser.jpg. Noch Fragen? Dann stell sie hier, und wenn ich nicht gleich antworte, erinnerst Du mich bitte auf meiner Diskussionsseite. Vielen Dank und viel Freude noch beim Mitmachen wünscht -- Rillke^(q?) 18:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Normalerweise kenne ich das auch, dass man in der HTML-Datei zur Grafik auf die Grafik klickt und sie dann in voller Größe angezeigt bekommt.

Wenn ich das aber bei meinem Browser mit dieser Datei mache, wird die Darstellung der Grafik nicht größer, als hochkant in das Browserfenster passt. Darum habe ich zur optimalen Lesbarkeit die Datei Franzius Unterweser 1407 px erstellt, die doch absolut niemandem weh tut.

Da viele Grafiken vor allem Hinsichtlich der Beschriftungen schöner werden, wenn man sie im Maßstab 2:1, 3:1 oder 4:1 zur optimalen Lesbarkeit erstellt, behalte ich mir vor, auch für andere Grafiken derartige Präsentationsdateien zu erstellen.--Ulamm (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Du kannst solche "Präsentationen" erstellen, allerdings nur in Deinem Benutzernamensraum, also z.B. User:Ulamm/Franzius Unterweser 1407 px. Andernfalls ist es nämlich der Galerie-Namensraum für den die Vorschrift Commons:Galerien gilt. Ein Tipp zum Browser: Firefox, Internet Explorer 11: Ctrl++ zum Vergrößern; Opera: zuerst mit der Lupe auf die größte Vergrößerung einstellen, dann mit Ctrl+- verkleinern. -- Rillke^(q?) 21:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Ich habe die Präsentationsdatei jetzt in meinen Namensraum verschoben und – vielen Dank für die Erstellung der parallelgrafik – auch noch eine entprechende Präsentationsdatei für das Querformat erstellt.

Die Notwendigkeit sehe ich allerdings nicht ein, denn weder habe ich die Präsentationsdatei als "gallery" bezeichnet, noch verbietet die Anleitung zur Erstellung von "galleries" die Erstellung von Präsentationsdateien für einzelne Grafiken.--Ulamm (talk) 22:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Der Hauptnamensraum in Commons ist aber nunmal der Galerie-Namensraum. Deshalb steht auf dem Reiter/Tab oben links auch "Galerie". Die Anleitung sagt, wofür Galerien da sind: Galerien existieren, um Lesern eine strukturierte und ansprechende Sammlung der hier erhältlichen Medien zu präsentieren. Sie werden für gewöhnlich erstellt um Beispiele bzw. eine kleine Übersicht über ein spezielles Thema zu geben. und Beim Erstellen einer neuen Galerie sollte Folgendes immer benutzt beziehungsweise eingefügt werden [...] Das gallery-Element. Meistens endet das so, das alles, was dem nicht entspicht, gelöscht wird. -- Rillke^(q?) 22:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

So eine Präsentationsdatei braucht kaum Speicherplatz. Sie schädigt nicht das Ansehen der Commons oder einer WIkipedia. Da sie nicht kategorisiert ist, irritiert sie auch keine Suchfunktionen. Die selbsternannten Ordnungshüter der freien Enzyklopädie sollten die Grundregel aller demokratischen Gesellschaften akzeptieren: Erlaubt ist, was nicht ausdrücklich verboten ist.--Ulamm (talk) 23:01, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Was ich damit sagen wollte ist, dass es wenig sinnvoll ist, in diese Angelegenheit viel Kraft oder Arbeitsaufwand zu investieren. Gute Nacht -- Rillke^(q?) 23:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Und irgendwie hatte ich mich doch verrannt; die volle Auflösung bekommt man natürlich auch mit der "Plus-Lupe".--Ulamm (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Chiavenna.png

File:Chiavenna.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 09:56, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Aare

Hallo Ulamm; wie ich sehe, wolltest du kürzlich die "Aar"-Kategorien in "Aare" umbenennen. Das scheint mir so weit auch in Ordnung zu sein (die auch in der englischen WP vorgebrachte Argumentation, dass sie durch deutschsprachige Gemeinden fliesst, hat was für sich), allerdings wirkt die Kategorisierung nun etwas konfus... Category:Aar gab es weiter, voller Bilder, neuerdings als Subkategorie von Category:Aare. Das ergibt m.E. so keinen Sinn - ich habe also die Bilder nach Category:Aare verschoben und unter Category:Aar einen "category redirect" gesetzt. Das gleiche werde ich auch noch für die anderen betroffenen Kategorien machen - d.h. auch Category:Aar in Bern als Subkategorie von Category:Aare in Bern ist nicht wirklich sinnvoll, das muss noch alles verschoben werden. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Das weiß ich. Allerdings habe ich ich der Hoffnung, dass das auch oder demnächst automatisch geht, zuerst einmal zwar alle Kategorien umkategorisiert, Einzelobjekte aber nur, wenn es nicht mehr als 20 pro Kategorie waren.--Ulamm (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:529c Radfstreifen HB Wachmannstr.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:529c Radfstreifen HB Wachmannstr.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:534 Radfstreifen HB Wachmannstr.jpg
• File:534c Radfstreifen HB Wachmannstr.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Suggestiestroken Wehl – Niew Wehl NL.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Suggestiestroken Wehl – Niew Wehl NL.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 21:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Suggestiestroken Wehl – Niew Wehl NL.jpg

File:Suggestiestroken Wehl – Niew Wehl NL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:635Gnevsdorfer Vorfluter, Elbe, Ki Werben.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:635Gnevsdorfer Vorfluter, Elbe, Ki Werben.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:635c Gnevsdorfer Vorfluter, Elbe, Ki Werben.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me

Copyright status: File:890Warturm Storchennest.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:890Warturm Storchennest.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:891Bahnunterf Neue Ochtum li.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:891Bahnunterf Neue Ochtum li.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:897Bahnunterf Neue Ochtum li.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:897Bahnunterf Neue Ochtum li.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:898 Schöpfwerk Huchting-Nord.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:898 Schöpfwerk Huchting-Nord.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:905Sodenmatt Kloßkampsw neu Zementpfl.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:905Sodenmatt Kloßkampsw neu Zementpfl.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bürgermeistererker Dom Domsheide.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bürgermeistererker Dom Domsheide.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 12:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Domstufen Bürgerschaft.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Domstufen Bürgerschaft.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 12:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Domstufen, Neues & Altes Rathaus.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Domstufen, Neues & Altes Rathaus.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 12:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Grasmarkt Dom Bürgerschaft Glocke.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grasmarkt Dom Bürgerschaft Glocke.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 12:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bürgermeistererker Mutter & Kind.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bürgermeistererker Mutter & Kind.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Scoopfinder^(d) 12:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:1409Brücke und Siele am alten Schöpfwerk Wasserhorst.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1409Brücke und Siele am alten Schöpfwerk Wasserhorst.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

• File:1411alte Brücke über das Maschinenfleet und Reste des alten Schöpfwerks.JPG
• File:1413altes Schöpfwerk Wasserhorst.JPG
• File:1414altes Schöpfwerk Wasserhorst.JPG
• File:1416Wasserhorst Kirchwurt.JPG

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Rouffach

Rouffach, Notre-Dame: Hauptschiff mit Obergaden mit Fenstern

Herr Lamm! Seien Sie doch einmal vernünftig! Bringen Sie eine Quelle, in der steht, dass die Kirche einen basilikalen Grundriss hat, anstatt einfach Ihren unbegründeten Ansatz durchzudrücken. Es mag ja sein, dass sie Recht haben, aber solange Sie keine Quelle angeben, können Sie hier keinen Edit-War führen. Beste Grüße, --Edelseider (talk) 05:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Die basilikale Struktur ergibt sich aus den Fotos.

Der Chor ist einschiffig, aber das Langhaus westlich der Vierung hat Obergaden mit Fenstern über den niedrigeren Seitenschiffen. La nef centrale est plus haut que les collateraux et a fenêtres supérieures. Das ist die Definition der Basilika als Bauform.

Gruß, Ulamm (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2R F+Radweg Z.240 ohne Pfeile K.43 (OHZ) re.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2R F+Radweg Z.240 ohne Pfeile K.43 (OHZ) re.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:2R F+Radweg Z.240 ohne Pfeile K.43 (OHZ) li.jpg
• File:2R F+Radweg Z.240 ohne Pfeile re(L 149 OHZ).jpg
• File:2R F+Radweg Z.240 ohne Pfeile li(L 149 OHZ).jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Please provide further information

Herr Dr Ulamm:

You uploaded a file some years ago, File:Oberschlesien 1921.png. It appears in the plebiscite map in such English articles as [2].

For that file, the type and amount of information provided is typical (usual), as compared to most other WIkimedia files.

However, as with most Wikipedia images, it is not truly sufficient to trace the content in a scholarly way, and therefore makes the material WP:OR if a source is not provided. That is, it is not possible from the file annotation, to tell unequivocally what source provided the information needed to present the graphic—in this case, which earlier atlas or other text that you used to generate this visual information.

For this reason, the content of the article where the image appears is not fully verifiable, per WP:Verify. Also, there is no way to answer simple technical questions—for instance, what the various shortened names (odd abbreviations) mean, that appear on the map.

My question to you:

Was this map re-drawn from Westermann's Monatshefte [Westermanns Monatshefte 1960 / 101. Jahrgang / Hefte 1 - 12 Verlag: Westermann, Braunschweig, 1960]? If not Westermann, from what source's information did you create it?

(Please, provide the source for your work. If you can provide a link, that would be most excellent.)

The following description appears in the accompanying description, without an English translation: "Die Markierung der Teilungsgrenze(n) erfolgte anhand Westermanns Monatshefte-Atlas (ca. 1960, "aktuelle" Karte in der damals üblichen retro-Darstellung). Die Darstellung von Kreisen, die nur teilweise zum Abstimmungegebiet gehörten, erfolgte anhand in Berichten genannter Ortsnamen."

Could you provide an English translation—your preferred translation—for the above text, and add it to the image file at Wikimedia commons? (I could translate it, but feel that you should be allowed to translate it, since it is your work, originally. If you would like me to check the English, I would be glad to do so.)

With kind regard, and thanks for your contributions, I am

Le Prof [User:Leprof_7272] 98.222.16.168 12:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Prof!

Incited by you, I've just completed the impressum.

For an internationalization, perhaps in a fortnight or a month, I'd prefer to create a Polish & German version, because of the names of the districts.

The names of the three states involved are also understood untranslated, I think.

Yours' Ulamm (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Neues Rathaus, Schütting 07h26.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Neues Rathaus, Schütting 07h26.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Restored & licensed after my return from a journey.--Ulamm (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Hauptsatzung der Stadt Bielefeld Anlage 1.png

Hallo Ulamm, du hattest verschiedene Bearbeitungen der Datei hochgeladen. Beachte bitte den mit Bedacht gewählten Dateinamen „Hauptsatzung der Stadt Bielefeld Anlage 1“, dem deine Bearbeitungen nicht entsprechen. Denn in der tatsächlichen Anlage, einem amtlichen Dokument, sind die von dir eingetragenen alten Grenzlinien nicht mit enthalten. Selbstverständlich kannst du Bearbeitungen dieser Datei hochladen, dann aber bitte unter einem neuen Dateinamen! Ich habe die Datei soeben auf die ursprüngliche Fassung zurückgesetzt. Danke für dein Verständnis. --ludger1961 (talk) 22:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bremen Domtürme von Rathausstufen 19h51 bb.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bremen Domtürme von Rathausstufen 19h51 bb.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Danke JuTa!

Das Bild ist ja eine bearbeitung eines von mir im Sommer hochgeladenen Fotos. In Solchen Fällen kopiere ich den Text der beschreibungsseite, normalerweise einschließlich drer Lizenz. Da habe ich getsern uz wenig kopiert.--Ulamm (talk) 07:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Umbenennung

Hallo Ulamm, wo ist denn die Bildreihe die du meinst? --Jean11 (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Ich hätte gerne die Aufblähung "Kutná Hora, Kutná Hora District" des filename durch die Angabe des gleichnamigen Okres behoben und konnte auch die Information verbessern "von Norden". Aber "zu langer Name" lässt sich nicht ankreuzen :) Schöne Weihnachten, Ulamm (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Hab auf #3 gestellt, vielleicht wäre der Name der jetzigen Kategorie besser gewesen, zu spät schon umbenannt. :) Danke, auch noch schöne Weihnachten. --Jean11 (talk) 18:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

façade/facade

Cassel's German-English Dictionary, New York, NY, 1978, only lists "façade". Therefore, this spelling cannot be forbidden, even if many people less correctly spell "facade".

In English like in French and most other western languages, "c" in front of "a", "o" and "u" is pronounced like "k". Only in eastern European languages (Slavic, Baltic and Hungarian), "c" is pronounced as "ts" in all positions (or in Polish in front of or together with an "i" almost like "tch". The Turkish pronounciation is "dj" (there ç is "tch").--Ulamm (talk) 19:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

This is not a phonetic problem. This is a problem of use. The two terms and façade facade, are recognized by English dictionaries; but the most used term is facade. Avoid making changes to the captions you are not the author mainly by erasing the label module.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

"Facade" and "façade" are not two different terms. "Facade" is an alteration on fonts that have no ç, which is an extension of the international Latin alphabet, such as ä, å, æ, ã, ą, č, ę, ñ, õ, œ, ø, š, ß and ż.

The primary reason of my entry was the wrong preposition: "Façade from Notre-Dame de la Dalbade" instead of "Façade of Notre-Dame de la Dalbade". "From" marks a direction, also of development, while "of" marks a dependence, like the Latin genitive case. ("of Rome" = "Romae" but "from Rome" = "ab Roma".--Ulamm (talk) 08:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bremer Dom Westkrypta als Eingang?.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bremer Dom Westkrypta als Eingang?.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:"Belarusian" Gothic in Lithuania

Hallo Uli, bin gerade beim Ausfegen, kommt da noch was rein oder kann die gelöscht werden? Gruß, --Achim (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Danke für deinen Hinweis!

Hm, ich bin erstaunt, dass die Kategorie jetzt leer ist.

Die Kategorie hatte ich genau angelegt, um keinen der konkurrierenden Nationalismen jener Region zu sehr vor den Kopf zu stoßen, aber anscheinend ist mir das nicht ganu gelungen.

Jetzt habe ich die entsprechenden Gebäude wieder der Kategorie zugeführt.--Ulamm (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Alles klar, danke Dir! Gruß, --Achim (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Habe die Seite Category:Orthodox church of the Annunciation in Supraśl jetzt geschützt, so dass unangemeldete und neue Benutzer sie nicht ändern können. Gruß und Dank, --Achim (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Mudéjar architecture in Spain & Portugal

Hi Ulamm, thank you for your message. The Arab baths of Girona and the palace of Olite are considered to be Romanesque and Gothic respectively according to the relevant articles in wikipedia Spanish. However, many sites are indeed missing from the map. Regards, tyk (talk) 10:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. Please, feel free to improve the map if you wish. Regards, tyk (talk) 11:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

o.k. – I'll copy our discussion to the discu-page of the file.--Ulamm (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Great! tyk (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mestlin Kirche.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mestlin Kirche.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Motzener Kanal160703.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Motzener Kanal160703.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Ollen vor Berne283.JPG
• File:Ollen moderner Bauernhof265.JPG
• File:Ollen Schafe268.JPG
• File:Ollen Lechterstr Butzhausen270.JPG
• File:Ollen Bauernhof Pferde273.JPG
• File:Bauernhof338.JPG
• File:Bauernhof334.JPG
• File:Bauernhof nahe Ollen335.JPG
• File:Ollen Altenesch261.JPG
• File:Bauernhaus Altenesch348.JPG
• File:Altenesch260.JPG
• File:Süderbrook St.-Gallus-Turm Ollen351.JPG
• File:Altenesch St.-Gallus von S253.JPG
• File:Altenesch St.-Gallus von NW256.JPG
• File:Altenesch St.-Gallus Innen354.JPG

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bauernhaus in Krögerdorf Ollen338.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bauernhaus in Krögerdorf Ollen338.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Bauernhof in Altenesch260.jpg
• File:Bauernhof in Harmenhausen334.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Borrado de imagen en la página de Torrebaja

Estimado wikipedista, siento comunicarte que he borrado una imagen tuya que subiste a la página de Torrebaja, porque no corresponde a este lugar. Dicha calle se denomina "calle del Paso" y está situada en Casasbajas, no en Torrebaja. Un cordial saludo.--Orxeta (talk) 10:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Muchas gracias Orxeta. Hice la foto en 1987, durante una etapa larga en bici (Sinarcas–Teruel–Peralba–Calamocha), pero verdaderamente he recordado el lugar como el primero pueblo después de la montaña sobre el barranco del Turia. Un cordial saludo egualmente, Ulamm (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Information-Vorlage

Hallo Ulamm, danke für deine Uploads hier bei Commons. Sei aber bitte bei den nächsten etwas sorgfältiger mit der Information-Vorlage. Sie war bei einiger deiner Bilder kaputt und ich musste sie reparieren. wie z. B. hier und da. Vielen Dank für deine Kooperation... Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 06:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Änderungsbedarf in File:Ostseetiefen.png

Die Tiefe des Landsorttiefs ist womöglich falsch angegeben: 459 m statt 456,61 m bzw. gerundet 457 m. Als PNG für mich nicht sinnvoll korrigierbar, daher dieser Hinweis.--*thing goes (talk) 23:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis!--Ulamm (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Italien_1843–1870.png

Hallo Ulamm, in der Karte Italien_1843–1870.png ist die Lombardai laut roter Zahl 1860 dem Kgr. Sardinien-Piemont / Italien beigetreten. Das war aber 1859 (laut Putzger, Großer Hist. Weltatlas und dem Artikel Risorgimento selbst, wo die Karte zu finden ist). Beste Grüße, --KaterBegemot (talk) 11:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ritzenbüttel Schifferhäuser Schafe468.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ritzenbüttel Schifferhäuser Schafe468.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Ulamm!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

File:Bremer Rathaus Kanzlei 1682-83 b.jpg

Hallo Ulamm, soll das Bild bei WLM teilnehmen (und sei es nur für den Zähler)? Dann ist die entsprechende Vorlage einzubinden. Sonst sind die WLM-Kategorien falsch.--Quarz (talk) 13:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

File:(CaW) 1dobsgBcT SW.tif

File:(CaW) 1dobsgBcT SW.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Ulamm!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

File:Bassin Seine.png

Bonjour Ulamm. Bravo pour la magnifique carte File:Bassin Seine.png qui a des légers problèmes de couleur : les noms des cours d'eau « Laignes » et « Yvette » sont écrits en bleu plus clair que les autres, et les villes de « Châtillon-sur-Seine » et « Fontainebleau » sont pointées en couleur rose alors que les autres sont en rouge. Une harmonisation de ces couleurs améliorerait cette carte. Si vous pouviez le faire, ce serait super. Merci d'avance. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 11:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Les différences des couleurs sont réfléchies:

Châtillon-sur-Seine et Fontainebleau sont des lieux intéressants pour comprendre les divers charactères de la vallée de la Seine, mais ils ne sont pas centres de la population.

Normalement j'ai seulement écrit les noms de cours d'eau plus longues que 40 km. L'Yvette et la Seignes ont moin que 40 km. Les deux noms étaient écrites par le premier auteur de la carte, Chamois rouge. L'Yvette est bien connue, par ce que elle n'est pas loing de Paris. Et la Laignes est intéressante, par ce que il-y-a deux cours superficiaux (appellées "Laigne" et "Laignes") avant et depuis un cours souterrain dans la calcaire. Le SANDRE ne compte pas la partie souterraine. Allors officiellement la Laigne et la Laignes sont deux cours s´parées de moin que 40 km chaque.

--Ulamm (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Merci pour la réponse et pour avoir adapté la légende de la carte. Juste une observation : en français, on dit « Petites villes notables » et non « Villes notables petites ». Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 10:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour Ulamm. Tu as modifié la carte du bassin de la Seine que j'avais proposée, c'est nickel c'est fait pour ça ! Je suis OK avec tes modifications dans l'ensemble sauf pour deux points : (1) je ne suis pas fan du tout du vert fluo pour les limites du bassin et (2) je ne suis pas non plus fan du violet pour les frontières internationales et les noms de pays. Concernant le point 2, la couleur choisie est souvent jaune ou noire. Comme les cartes éditées par le National Geographic (https://shop.nationalgeographic.com/category/maps/wall-maps/continent-maps) ou Michelin (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cartes+michelin&t=lm&atb=v29-3__&iax=1&ia=images). Je te propose donc de modifier ces deux thèmes.

Bien cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chamois rouge (talk • contribs) 21:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Strasbourg Communauté.png

File:Strasbourg Communauté.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Edelseider (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Holland-Belgien-Lux1844.png

File:Holland-Belgien-Lux1844.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 14:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017

Hallo Ulamm!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC))

File:Caen, Trinité 01.jpg

Hören Sie bitte auf, fremde Fotos mit Ihren Verschlimmbesserungen zu verunstalten. Wenn Sie eine neue Version wollen, benutzen Sie die höchste JPEG-Kompressionsrate oder kriieren Sie eine neue Version. Überschreiben mit sowas geht gar nicht. --A.Savin 11:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Die vorherigen Versionen sind ja im Gegensatz zu echtem Überschreiben nicht verloren.

Normalerweise gebe ich meinen Bearbeitungen einen neuen Dateinamen, aber das vorgefundene Foto war einfach nur zu dunkel.

• 
  Parsifall
• 
  übearbeitet

--Ulamm (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)