User talk:Vengolis/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Edit conflict

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Vengolis. You promoted File:Liebenfels Soerg 12 Pfarrkirche hl Martin und Pfarrhof Ost-Ansicht 21092017 1112.jpg while I was writing my post promoting it and saying where a remaining dust spot was. Now, there's a "third template parameter" error that I can't figure out how to fix. If you know how, please fix it. Thanks.

Best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Sarovaram 21.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sarovaram 21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nick Moreau (talk) 22:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Sarovaram 20.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sarovaram 20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nick Moreau (talk) 22:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Sarovaram 22.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sarovaram 22.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nick Moreau (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Sarovaram 23.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sarovaram 23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nick Moreau (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Misidentified image

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Vengolis; Your QI, File:Harpaphe haydeniana 8437.jpg, is misidentified as en:Harpaphe haydeniana, I think. As that article says, "Orthomorpha coarctata, an unrelated species, has a transverse groove in each segment." I see those grooves in your photograph. I frequently see (and photograph) Harpaphe haydeniana in its native range, the temperate moist forests along the Pacific coast of North America, although I am mostly unfamiliar with other Polydesmida species. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 23:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Crown cinemas-Calicut 19.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Crown cinemas-Calicut 19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Y.haruo (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Poorva 11.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Poorva 11.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File renaming

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Vengolis, I would like to rename this file. Since your were the uploader, your help would be highly appreciated. Thank you for your time. :à Lotje (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plumbago auriculata 2718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aristolochia ringens 3791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipomoea cairica 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Butterfly pea 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daisy Tree (Montanoa bipinnatifida) 3452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aristolochia ringens 3801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plumeria rubra 2852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White moth 11975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montanoa bipinnatifida 3563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nephila kuhlii 3907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Butterflies

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Do you remember the country of the butterflies in [1]. For example: [2], [3]. Kind regards, Rudolphous (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daisy Tree (Montanoa bipinnatifida) 3472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipomoea triloba 6537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tagiades litigiosa 8787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clitoria arborea 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolichandrone spathacea 9362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpinia galanga 2980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plumbago auriculata 2717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hibiscus aculeatus 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centrosema pubescens 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tagiades litigiosa 8666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Vengolis 06746.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Mitte27 (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hypoestes phyllostachya 0200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hypoestes phyllostachya 0220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clerodendrum speciosissimum 3051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clerodendrum speciosissimum 3055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clerodendrum speciosissimum 3041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 4307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Climbing Oleander(Strophanthus gratus) 4225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FileStrophanthus gratus 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupterote sp 9857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemanchery8771 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Climbing Oleander(Strophanthus gratus) 4230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passiflora foetida6598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passiflora foetida 6604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passiflora foetida6628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The flowers of this are lovely. Personally I prefer the flowers of Passiflora incarnata. --PumpkinSky 02:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)PumpkinSky Yes.Your FP of Passiflora incarnata is awesome - QICbot (talk) Thank you. PumpkinSky 16:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arctornis sp 11951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kopsia fruticosa 2806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipomea pes caprae 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tagiades litigiosa 8642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Climbing Oleander(Strophanthus gratus) 4214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficus auriculata 0225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Callidrepana patrana 9976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merremia vitifolia 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 4298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aristolochia ringens 3814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flesh fly 6972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daisy Tree (Montanoa bipinnatifida) 3468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anisochilus carnosus 6330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tetragnatha Sp 7946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupterote sp 9830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chromolaena odorata 8577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telicota bambusae 3196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pentas lanceolata 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montanoa bipinnatifida 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemanchery8731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus annuus 00064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus annuus 9946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phasmatodea2958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water snow flat 7767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Jezebel 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia milii 2915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acalypha hispida 4370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Climbing Oleander(Strophanthus gratus) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kulamavu9737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 4305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 4308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bauhinia sp 2957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clitoria arborea 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bauhinia sp 4110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthetrum luzonicum4617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amaranthaceae 8217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cranefly 1774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delias eucharis 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. FPC? --PumpkinSky 02:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

QIC image

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

An image of mine you tried to promote at QIC has been sent to CR. We've tried to fix it. Can you take a look? Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 11:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

PumpkinSky It's better know - --Vengolis (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 01:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selaginella braunii 8492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 02:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brachydiplax chalybea 4504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 02:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 02:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymphoides indica 9313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 02:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurybrachys sp 9136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 02:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strophanthus gratus 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipomoea triloba 6487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangrove Trumpet Tree5512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strobilanthes lanatus 3143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justicia 9805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selaginella braunii 7204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonerila rheedii 01654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonerila rheedii 01676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diplazium sp 7017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipomoea cairica 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Jezebel-Delias eucharis 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarovaram 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kakkavayal4384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diplazium sp 7013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strobilanthes lanatus 9158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficus arnottiana 0644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Condylostylus Sp 6986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geissaspis cristata 0111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selaginella braunii 8461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficus hispida 8413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flora of Wayanad 0112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cissus bicolor 7228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cissus bicolor 7235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

File:D(gggg.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:D(gggg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Vengolis!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Especially for photographs of plants animals, please categorize (or at least mention) the location as well as type of organism.Animalparty (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Kkds 82.jpg etc.

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Vengolis, thanks for uploading. However, all uploads should have a meaningful file name. Also, a description "Kkds" doesn't help anybody. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Trachinotus baillonii122.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Trachinotus baillonii122.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Trachinotus baillonii122.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Vengolis,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peucetia viridansr 7059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Lynx Spider 7064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aethriamanta brevipennis 06911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scutelleridae 5699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:56, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mimegralla albimana 6249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes, good quality, but you should specify that they're mating. -- Ikan Kekek 08:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cookeina sp 7088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurema blanda7179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mycalesis perseus 6766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peucetia viridana7019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peucetia viridans 6970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hydrocotyle asiatica 6130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sida acuta 5862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peucetia viridana 6985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neurothemis fulvia 9569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodothemis rufa 9660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neurothemis tullia-male 7599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crane Fly 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peucetia viridana 7033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mimegralla albimana 6250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scutelleridae 5736.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chocolate Albatross 02206.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caladium sp 5845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupterote sp 9841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Climbing Oleander(Strophanthus gratus) 4199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Lynx Spider7037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides 6129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cookeina sp 7091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chocolate Albatross 02184.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mycalesi 09165.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tagiades litigiosa8654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurema blanda7243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centella asiatica 6107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bavia aericeps 8449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Climbing Oleander(Strophanthus gratus) 4238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spider8069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hyllus sp 7855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dermaptera 7752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hydrocotyle sp 6154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spider 8447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bavia kairali 8259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment - You should specify in the file description that it's eating, and as near as you can, what it's eating. -- Ikan Kekek 07:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acraea terpsicore 8660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brachydiplax chalybea 7976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bavia kairali8254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spider 05573.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spider 05591.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delias eucharis 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tricolored Marsh Hawk Male - Orthetrum luzonicum 4593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hibiscus rosa-sinensis 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hibiscus rosa-sinensis 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aethriamanta brevipennis 6895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus sp 5917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus viduus (female) 6098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus viduus 5992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giant huntsman spider 8264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lippia sp 0258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tricolored Marsh Hawk Male - Orthetrum luzonicum 4542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tricolored Marsh Hawk Male - Orthetrum luzonicum4522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus viduus female 6002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhyothemis triangularis-5822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparassidae spp 8267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bavia aericeps 8345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bavia aericeps 8361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayanadu 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spider 8343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lentinus sp 7871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lentinus sp 7898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:40, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus viduus 6101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganoderma sp 8119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centella asiatica 6121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 22:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mimegralla albimana 7782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tricolored Marsh Hawk Male - Orthetrum luzonicum 4545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipomoea cairica 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus viduus 6099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus viduus 6103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganoderma sp 8116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centratherum punctatum 3541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annona squamosa 20180920 133254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deccan ground gecko (Cyrtodactylus deccanensis) 0920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clitoria ternatea 20180921 110627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senecio bombayensis 1479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pentatomidae (nymph) 1322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tagiades litigiosa 2218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water snow flat (Tagiades litigiosa) 1866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jacquemontia pentanthos 20180921 115649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Homoeocerus sp 0943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Lynx Spider7014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrhotus sp 5909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tricolored Marsh Hawk Male - Orthetrum luzonicum 4548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dermaptera (Earwig) 7718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justicia procumbens 7952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water snow flat (Tagiades litigiosa) 1841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthetrum chrysis 2485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diplacodes nebulosa 04320.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slender blue skimmer 1739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspidomorpha miliaris 4603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspidomorpha miliaris Spotted Tortoise Beetle 4608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ariadne sp 8726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carriola sp.7092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bavia kairali 2321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cyrtodactylus deccanensis 0921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus annuus 9984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus annuus 9987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus annuus 9955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus annuus 9942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Climbing Oleander(Strophanthus gratus) 4244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thunbergia erecta 03944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macrotarsipus sp 05464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justicia sp2174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hasora badra 05101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:54, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water snow flat (Tagiades litigiosa) 2076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lycosidae sp 5219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acmella uliginosa i 5062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tettigoniidae 3536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stenaelurillus albus 09680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bactrocera 08511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonerila rheedii 01669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aciagrion occidentale 02035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common picture wing (Rhyothemis variegata) 07554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 02:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pteris sp 2878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 02:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castalius rosimon 6205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acrida sp 00390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chlorophyllum spp 6123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysomya sp 07731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lepidagathis keralensis 7510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aethaloessa calidalis 05660.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aethaloessa calidalis 05665.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exoskeleton remains of a grasshopper 07081.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hypolimnas misippus (male) 6408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Chemancheri 3126.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Chemancheri 3126.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Chemancheri 3091.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Chemancheri 3091.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Chemancheri 1938.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Chemancheri 1938.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Chemancheri 1959.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Chemancheri 1959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Chemancheri 1961.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Chemancheri 1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)