Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades

Nominación

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.

Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

{{Support}} ( Support),
{{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
{{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
{{Comment}} ( Comment),
{{Info}} ( Info),
{{Question}} ( Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas

Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
que haya un mínimo de siete votos a favor
que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)
si a partir del quinto día, la candidatura tiene al menos diez votos a favor y ninguno en contra, automáticamente será destacada (regla del quinto día)

Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas

Featured picture candidates

File:Das Grüne Band am Trappstadter Hügel 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2024 at 04:51:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Thuringia
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 04:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trier, 07-12-2023 (actm.) 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2024 at 04:27:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info Trier, the Römerbrücke over the Moselle. (Detail to the north side). The low position of the winter sun provides special light under the Roman bridge.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vulcão dos Capelinhos 2023-03-04-7.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2024 at 01:13:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Capelinhos Volcano viewed from the eponymous lighthouse. The pre-1957 eruption sea cliff is visible on the right. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fauvette du désert Jebil NP.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2024 at 20:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info No FPs of this species. Created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fauvette de l'Atlas Femelle Jebil NP.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2024 at 20:26:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info No FPs of this species. Created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even exposure, good lighting, sharp subject, blurred background. The bird really stands out and shows a lot of the field marks needed to help someone ID it. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 1:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Per above, superb composition. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista panoramica dalla fortezza di Bertinoro - Emilia-Romagna - GT 02- 2024-07-01.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2024 at 19:06:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
Info In this panoramic view, I like to highlight the alternation of wheat fields, vineyards, olive groves, sunflower fields and more that create patches of different colors. In the background the mountains of the Tuscan-Romagnolo Apennines are partially visible but recognisable, at a distance of 44 kilometres. As it is a very large image, I suggest to browse it with ZoomViewer. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 20:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scoliid wasp (Megascolia bidens) male Cap Bon 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2024 at 17:14:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Scoliidae (Scoliid Wasps)
Info No FPs of this insect family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three quarter view of the ruined Khmer Hindu temple of Wat Phou with blue sky in Champasak Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2024 at 03:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well exposed with the foreground well lit without distracting shadows. Detail shows well in the reliefs and even the texture of the stones that make up the structure. Boy is that sky blue too! --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 5:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose All the trees are blurry and out of focus. You only closed to f8 even though you were in ISO 50 and you could have closed the diaphragm even more to have a completely sharp photo. The whites are also overexposed but it is fixable in post processing. El Golli Mohamed 20:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
💡 Info There was wind, that's why some leaves are moving. It's not a matter of depth of field. Whites are correct in my view. It is sunny. All the white parts should be white, not gray, and there are not blown highlights in this picture. Main subject is the building. In focus, with consistent depth of field and wide focal length (24 mm), taken at the distance. Increasing the depth of field by reducing the speed would result in more motion blur for the leaves. F/8 offers the best sharpness with that specific lens and thus is an intentional choice -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But why you didn't increase the ISO, you had only ISO 50 and it was windy so you had to increase the speed even with higher ISO. It isn't sports photography or wildlife photography so you had plenty of time to check your settings to avoid tree shake blur El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Slightly blurry trees are no big deal since they're not the main subject. --Zzzs (talk) 01:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately the heavy stones of this building dating from the 11th-13th century did not move with the wind :-) Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Social Flycatcher.png

Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2024 at 03:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae_(Tyrant_Flycatchers)
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can you please look how others use categories. Species and location are needed. Most of the categories you have at the moment should go. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Charles (I'm a Charles too!) I removed most of the categories. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail for this large resolution, smooth bokeh. But please, improve the categories, per COM:OVERCAT -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for sharing that. I think my error is based on how people use meta tags. That I was trying to consider any category that applied. I have bookmarked the page and will refer to it as I upload new images, and I'll go through the images I have uploaded in the past to reduce the categories.Needsmoreritalin (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Segovia - Aqueduct - 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 20:40:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Spain
Info created by Benjism89 - uploaded by Benjism89 - nominated by Benjism89 -- Benji 20:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Benji 20:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor crop --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:City Lights of Asia and Middle East 2016.png

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 19:05:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Earth
Info This image depicts an exceptionally realistic view of Earth from space and coloring showcased in regions at sunrise and morning. Earth’s night City lights as observed in 2016; this "aesthetic" and high quality image is drawn from the 2016 global composite map(a featured picture) that was added to Worldview and GIBS. The compositing technique selected the best cloud-free nights in each month over each land mass. (Clouds and sunlight were added to the image for aesthetic effect.) created by NASA Earth Observatory - uploaded by Redmyname31 - nominated by User:Redmyname31 -- User:Redmyname31 (talk) 19:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Redmyname31 (talk) 19:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An important and useful image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gotland Grand National October 2023 61.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 10:04:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
Info Start of the 40th edition of Gotland Grand National 2023. Gotland Grand national is the world's biggest, and one of the oldest, Enduro competition. It was the last race on the original course and the race will move to a new location in 2024. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sports are hard to shoot! And here, drops of mud on the lens - very atmospheric! JukoFF (talk) 20:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The flying chunks of mud give the scenery a realistic look. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry to dissent, my opinion is that F/3.2 was too shallow with that long focal length (70 mm). In that case, the depth of field would have benefited by increasing the ISO sensitivity. The most visible riders, in the foreground, are all blurry, out of focus. In addition, as part of the composition, the crop at the bottom is not optimum, because the wheel of the biker at the right is cut out -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for reviews and comments.
- Without disagreeing with everything you say Basile Morin. I don't think your points are that important here
- a) you don't have time to make the perfect composition. You just had a few seconds. This photo was taken exactly seven seconds earlier.
- b) this kind of crowding and chaos is an important part of the racing format with a mass start.
- c) focus is not bad imo nor the composition. Focus is on driver number 64 in the middle of the photo and you have to open the images in full resolution to find that the drivers around are slightly out of focus
- d) and no one outside Wikimedia Commons judges the merits of sports images by open them in full resolution.
- e) It's a high resolution image.
- --ArildV (talk) 06:36, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, quickly, 1) You're welcome, a) When time is limited, try to frame larger during the action, then you'll have all the time to crop afterwards, b) The crowd is fine, no worry about that, c) we disagree about the focus. Depth of field could have been more generous. We could also say that this is what makes the difference between an ordinary photo and a great one. At thumbnail size, the biker at the left is already blurry. So that's not very appealing. d) Not sure, but anyway here it's Commons :-) Otherwise there would be a bunch of fair candidates, too, at smaller resolution. e) Yes, high resolution with limited DoF. Finally I find this is a good candid picture, but not an extraordinary one. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

- - Just a clarification. There was no time to switch between lenses/cameras and Nikon's superb 70-200 was a reasonable choice of lens imo. There were hundreds of motorcycles so some motorcycle or rider will always be cropped regardless of focal length. And without a zoom lens, the picture would (in my humble opinion) be much more boring. I personally think that one of the picture's strengths is that you get so close to the riders. Best regards--ArildV (talk) 07:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On another way, it's a blurry image (foreground AND background), except when you zoom in :-) Then you think "oh, this rider here is not out of focus". But alone in the crowd. To summarize my personal point of view, I would have preferred that the whole thing was sharper, and the composition better mastered. All the best -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I must say, I'm delighted how well ArildV has been able to capture this event. We've been missing good photos of this big sport event for years now. The reason for this, is that it is actually really hard to photograph. The race is held in the beginning of winter, and often coincides with the first snow. The light is therefore extremely bad (part of the race is made in darkness) and the bikers are moving very fast; that's the challenge for the photographers. Adding to that, it is also mostly damp with temperatures just above freezing at the track and mud is flying everywhere. When I lived on Gotland, I often thought about trying to shoot this race, but I always chickened out. ArildV is braver that me. ;-) --Cart (talk) 10:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral What a nice image. But I think Basile Morin is right. Otherwise the image could be very good when cropped much tighter to the in focus driver in the middle. --August Geyler (talk) 16:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un groupe de dromadaire dans le desert tunisien.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 09:42:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Camelidae (Camelids)
Info created by Skander Zarrad - uploaded by Skander Zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 09:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 09:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very appealing colour contrast. --August Geyler (talk) 10:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per August. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 12:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support POTY finalist for sure. ★ 13:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 23:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hi-gradience work. --Mile (talk) 07:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating color gradient that beautifully emphasizes the weight of the main subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light, colours, and textures. – Aristeas (talk) 14:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent! --SHB2000 (talk) 23:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. From where did you take this shot? Poco a poco (talk) 08:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a really interesting shot. When viewed small, it doesn't even look real. The colors work well with the rusty sand complementing the blue. Even the sand around the subject is brighter than the patch with the camels. A captivating image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 2:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Babosa de mar (Flabellina babai), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-26, DD 22.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 06:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
Info Sea slug (Luisella babai), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. It is present in the Mediterranean Sea, the Adriatic Sea and it has also been reported from the Atlantic coasts of Spain, Portugal and Senegal. It inhabits rocky bottoms at depths of 5 to 50 m. It can reach a length of about 30–53 millimetres (1.2–2.1 in) and they feed on hydroids. Note: we have no FPs of the whole family Flabellinidae/Samlidae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry but the subject is not sharp at all, and the whites are a bit overexposed El Golli Mohamed 13:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, I have to assume again that this has nothing to do with my last vote in one of your noms. This is getting boring. We are talking here about a tiny animal shot underwater and still there is more detail here and in some current FPCs Poco a poco (talk) 08:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I remember you that it's just a comment not a vote so don't tell me please about your last vote. This is boring. An underwater photo doesn't mean an unsharp photo, not well exposed. You did good sharp underwater photos that I supported as FP. This one is not a good quality. Try to fix it. If Ermell for exemple voted against your photo that you nominated today for QI, that means that it's in relation with an old vote? It's simply because your photo has not a good quality. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oval portrait miniature of Gustave Duchesne oil painting by Valentine Manchon Duchesne in 1886.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 01:05:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Miniature. Dimensions : only 95 x 120 mm (3.74 x 4.7 in) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too many white spots; passable for QI, not for FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The painter used a single-haired brush for this high precision work -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That says nothing about the white spots on the outside. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To give a scale here, a hair mesures 8 micrometers. Each eye 5 x 2.2 millimeters -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You...still haven't answered or fixed my issue with the white spots on the outside. They're fixable. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

💡 Info And if you zoom in on this painting for example (which is proportionally 35 times larger), you'll see a bunch of small cracks, which are characteristic of high resolution paintings, and which testify to the real condition of the canvas. These details are important, and don't always deserve to be erased. They can also give an interesting indication of scale and level of detail of the artwork -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Praia do Ribeiro do Cavalo6.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2024 at 00:49:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: a sea stack at the Ribeiro do Cavalo beach; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Did Hercules lose his club here? --Llez (talk) 08:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Прибалхашский заказник сверху (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2024 at 23:52:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 23:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 23:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oriental shorthair, black spotted tabby.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2024 at 21:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info created by Felinlove - uploaded by Felinlove - nominated by Felinlove -- Felinlove (talk) 21:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felinlove (talk) 21:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Blown highlights at the top of the image? --Zzzs (talk) 21:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzzs Would this work better? It's actually sunlight hitting the curtains from outside. Felinlove (talk) 01:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Good portrait with strong emotions. But blown out highlights at the wall ruins the composition. --August Geyler (talk) 09:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Augustgeyler, I would rather agree. Will this work better? It's actually sunlight hitting the curtains from outside. Felinlove (talk) 01:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I see the problem. The image needs that sunlight from the curtain to express the emotional feeling connected to the cats attitude. After you changed the exposure the effect is gone and the curtain look unnatural. But without your changes it looks as there was a defect. So I am not sure about your nomination any more. --August Geyler (talk) 15:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are still blown highlights on the floor, blanket, and hair. And there is a white border frame at the top and at the right. Also, at ISO 3200, the picture is not very sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question This appears to be a forcibly domesticated wild animal (or a hybrid) or is it some kind of cat?. Because if it is a wild or hybrid animal, I would not like to support this image. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clouds, cloudscape over Lombok Strait, Gili Islands, Indian Ocean, Indonesia.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2024 at 20:44:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Clouds
Info Tropical beach and equatorial tropical clouds over the Lombok Strait, Gili Islands, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia, in the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ). All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 20:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lenguado común (Solea solea), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-28, DD 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2024 at 20:34:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Soleidae (True Soles)
Info Common sole (Solea solea), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. It lives on the sandy or muddy seabed of the northern Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea where it often partially immerses itself in the substrate. The small eyes are close to each other on the right side of the body. This gives the fish the possibility of lurking half-buried in the sand for passing prey. The common sole, just like all other flatfishes, hatches as an "ordinary" fish with one eye on each side of the body. The young metamorphose to flatfish when they are about one centimeter long. It grows to a maximum length of about 70 centimetres (28 in). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't know why the colors are shifting to purple, blue and green. Is it a problem with the white balance? It looks like it was taken through glass. Is this an aquarium? El Golli Mohamed 20:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Road Padum Zanskar Range Jun24 A7CR 00818.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2024 at 15:56:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
Info Road from Karsha to Padum (elev. 3,500 m (11,500 ft)), with the Zanskar range towering 2,400 m (8,000 ft) above. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely mountain. Wolverine XI 20:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love pictures like this, which make it seem like the road will go directly into the mountain. Also like it when it happens irl. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 05:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive relief with the snow. The road gives the impression that these mountains are very accessible -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin: Padum is reached via the Darcha-Padum road. This runs over the 16,580 ft (5,050 m) Shiko La pass which is closed for 6 months. Tagooty (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 14:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un groupe de grand cormoran sur un bateau échoué - Djerba - Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2024 at 09:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks
Info created by Skander Zarrad - uploaded by Skander Zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 09:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 09:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This would have already been a beautiful photo thanks to the good light and the colours of the peeling paint on the ship, but the cormorants gathering makes it a great one. One plea: If the horizon is the open sea, it should be horizontal, so please consider to rotate the image a little bit anticlockwise. – Aristeas (talk) 14:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the horizon, thank you very much :) Skander zarrad (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The birds makes this otherwise good image even better. Well done! Wolverine XI 20:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ Very nice mood and appealing composition. I may support once the tilt is corrected. The picture is not horizontal -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the horizon, thank you very much :) Skander zarrad (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SupportBut this picture is not horizontal...--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 05:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the horizon, thank you very much :) Skander zarrad (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Left crop, i would need some air. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, although I agree with Mile that more space on the left would have helped the overall composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sobyanin meeting Evtushenko 05.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 05:34:46
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
A color portrait of the famous Russian writer Yevgeny Yevtushenko, published on the official website of Moscow in 2015 (two years before his death). - nominated by --MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support: striking portrait; too bad about the tight crop on top --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tight crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No meeting in this image. Was the other person cropped out? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp No, there is no photo cropping here. This is a fill from the source, and the file itself is taken from the general category. Is it then worth cropping the photo and nominating it in a new way? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Crop is fine; just the file name is not ideal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Such crops are not uncommon in portrait photography; the quality is good, nice background bokeh. (BTW also a likeable person.) – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larus michahellis atlantis at Playa del Confital (47206133632) 2 March 2019.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 16:04:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info created and uploaded by Bengt Nyman - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice synchronization and compo. Needs some noise correction imo--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to fulfill your request and fix the image, but the file size dropped dramatically and colours of the image had to be converted to sRGB. Another editor has to fix the errors. I reckon W.carter or the uploader could fix it. Thanks in advance to whoever fixes the problems. Zzzs (talk) 06:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The current version is too small. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp By size or resolution? Zzzs (talk) 07:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, bad wording. It is OK in resolution but landscape crop might be better. (not that I think it is FP!). Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  The only method I could think of is cropping the top. It might be a tight crop and could be unpleasant for some users, possibly reducing the chances of being a FP. Zzzs (talk) 07:20, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice gesture of the birds, a welcome addition to the FP galleries. Yes, a bit more room at the left and right could be nice, but on the other hand the birds crane their neck up to the sky, therefore the lead room is at the top and the composition is reasonable. – Aristeas (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grant E., Hamilton, Their New Jerusalem, 1892 Cornell CUL PJM 1111 01.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2024 at 05:34:46

Original

To replace: Restored version

Info The rather tinted paper was definitely pulling this image down, as well as some bleedthrough and a fold line (with some mirroring across the fold line). Also, it wasn't actually the largest version available at the source, but I think that's an uncontroversial sort of change, even for an FP, so I just updated it. New version will need my name added as restorer on the page, but that's not a big deal, I don't think. (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As Hubertl said, try to keep it "original". Here is completely other image, for me oversaturated. Size should be same, now is behalved. --Mile (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Mile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace The new version brings back all the intensity the original might have had when it was new. --August Geyler (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haltern am See, Naturpark Hohe Mark, Hohemarkenbusch, Baumstamm -- 2024 -- 4411 (kreativ 2).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 17:43:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional_camera_movement_(ICM)
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 17:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Could you explain what this image is about? Wolverine XI 21:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info In short: photographic art as described. In long: Explaining photographic art is certainly not easy, but I can say something about how it came about. The motif was a tree trunk with a varied structure - with different shades of green and brown. This tree trunk was photographed using the "Intentional camera movement" technique, so that the corresponding movement effect was created. The direction of movement of the camera was parallel to the tree trunk. The exposure time was chosen so that the structure of the trunk was still preserved. (It was only an exposure time of 0.6 seconds, so not too little and not too much). In post-processing, the image was edited so that the contrasts were emphasized and at the same time the colors were made a little more saturated. The resulting image was the basis for the image shown here. In the final step, the image was duplicated (in 2 layers) and one layer was mirrored in order to achieve the symmetry effect. Both layers were then blended together so that the dark tones were dominant. --XRay 💬 04:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation;

Support. Wolverine XI 20:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I don't know if this is art. We usually only know this after the artist's death. But I think it's well done.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't know what to say about this. I will hear the opinion on the other editors. --Zzzs (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

I find your statement remarkable and honest. It is understandable. I have had these difficulties myself and still have them today. For me, it is a further development of photographic creativity. I first had to make friends with ICM, but I already enjoy the pictures that are created with it. I also have a preference for symmetries. I can only recommend trying out lots of things and being creative with photography. --XRay 💬 20:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the diversity, you can also hear my subjective opinion here: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg. Not at all my taste, although I respect XRay's works, and often appreciate other photos -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support IMHO it is Art --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like how we still get a "tree-feeling" from this, even though the ICM turned it into a geometrical abstract. I also love the colours. --Kritzolina (talk) 16:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks like an abstract watercolour painting in which you can interpret a lot, for example at least three mystical figures. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I very sincerely believe that the project does not need this kind of experimentation. For it will be open to any postmegasurrealism for all, though I may be too conservative. JukoFF (talk) 23:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. – Aristeas (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. – Terragio67 (talk) 19:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Like a Rorschach test, always intriguing, but seldom exciting, sorry, no wow -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC2244-16-12-2022-Hamois Luc Viatour.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2024 at 07:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created & uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 07:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another beautiful one. – Aristeas (talk) 14:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry to spoil the party but this is overprocessed, the stars are oversharpened and with weird colors, oversaturated, clipped in places and quite noisy. Not among the best astrophotographies in Commons. --C messier (talk) 13:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per C messier --August Geyler (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 17:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Largo do Pelourinho Salvador 2019-9754.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 21:18:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Brazil
Info Largo do Pelourinho, Salvador, Bahia, a World Heritage Site in Brazil. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you crop bottom shadow part out, might be more interesting. --Mile (talk) 08:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Cropped version added. ★ 12:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could go with both. --Mile (talk) 14:08, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is better El Golli Mohamed 14:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 14:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detail resolution could be better, but I like how the houses are staggered and the colours are great. The woman and the man in red in front of the two blue houses complete the image. – Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but it isn't sharp in my eyes, although conditions were optimal. Poco a poco (talk) 09:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colours and interesting scene. Sharpness and detail are quite low here. Additionally I don't like the amount of perspective correction needed here. --August Geyler (talk) 15:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perspective correction? It is a steep street… ★ 16:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The point of view was lower than most buildings in that scene, so I assumed the camera had to be tilted upwards and to compensate for resulting perspective distortion a perspective correction was applied here afterwards. August Geyler (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Convento do Carmo de Salvador Oculus Window 2018-1327.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2024 at 13:52:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info Oculus window, Convento do Carmo de Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different and well-captured. -- ★ 13:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Don't you have two other active nominations? --Zzzs (talk) 14:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  I just withdrew the mobile phone nominee. ★ 14:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question to Prburley: you're an excellent photographer, how can we have some kind of contact with you? ★ 14:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even if the quality is not very very good, I like it El Golli Mohamed 19:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurred outside detracts for me. Greater DoF would help. --Tagooty (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-done composition. As the subject is the window, the outside is rightly out of focus – if the houses were in focus, too, the beautiful window grating would be almost unrecognizable. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 08:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely conceived topic. The photo appears slightly tilted.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Зимний уральский лес.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 21:52:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Volga Federal District
Info Trees in the snow on the slope of Mount Shudya-Pendysh in the Northern Urals on a winter day / Created by Dendaris - uploaded by Dendaris - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this a night shot? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overprocessed? Underexposed? ★ 03:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever it is, somehting looks off with the light and colours. I would rule out a night shot because of the shadows. Kritzolina (talk) 14:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was taken at 12:30, so… ★ 21:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the shadows, I think the timestamp might not be correct, but we can't be sure Kritzolina (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The timestamp for the light and everything seem totally fine to me (perhaps a bit underexposed), considering how low and weak the sun is up here in the north in winter. Compare with this taken at 12:20 at roughly about the same latitude and the same number of days away from the winter solstice. This is the light we get at noon for about three months each year (no wonder we invented Nordic noir ;-) ). People often marvel at our midnight sun here in the summer, but rarely think about the other side of the coin: the midday darkness in winter. 'Pinging' those with questions, Frank Schulenburg, ArionStar, Kritzolina. --Cart (talk) 09:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation ... I will think about this one for a bit now. Kritzolina (talk) 09:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I photographed this, I would boost the light a bit to this to get a better photo in the end (feel free to use if you want to). It's more like what the eye would perceive. --Cart (talk) 09:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong vignetting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark for my liking. Wolverine XI 19:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like the atmosphere of this photo as well as the colorsEl Golli Mohamed 19:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but the vignetting blew it --Zzzs (talk) 08:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support thanks to Cart’s explanation. The snow-covered trees look like bizarre sculptures. – Aristeas (talk) 08:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaguar (Panthera onca palustris) female Piquiri River 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 21:12:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info We have seven FPs of the jaguar (two in zoos). All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are a problem with a category --Wilfredor (talk) 21:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Error caused by WLE Brazil upload bot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm still waiting for the Brazilian issue. ★ 22:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment his face and more precisely at the level of the eyes and cheeks it is a little blurry and it lacks contrast, it looks like it was taken through a window, it is not sharp. It isn't even a QI El Golli Mohamed 22:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over processed, noisy image. Sorry--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+ those green grasses are distracting --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The fur has a strange texture, probably processing artefacts. The pose is not exciting compared to the FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Many details are lost, noise → ISO 3200. --Mile (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added a "correction" but need author approval. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Wilfredor: ; please choose whichever of your two versions is the final one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shagil Kannur, Tagooty, and PetarM: This is a beautiful animal and due to the condition I think it is an acceptable quality so I will ping others here to give it a second look. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not "one of the finest on the site", there are much better FPs of jaguars and similar animals. To me it does not meet the FPC criteria. Tagooty (talk) 01:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not even a QI imo --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I realy dont see any FP here. --Mile (talk) 07:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question How close were you to this Jaguar. What kind of life insurance / health insurance do you have? :) --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 04:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We were in a small speed boat on the river, with the jaguar on the river bank 30 (?) metres away. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per above --Zzzs (talk) 04:52, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honoré Daumier, Nadar élevant la Photographie à la hauteur de l'Art, 1862, NGA 42966.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2024 at 02:07:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Caricatures
Info created by Honoré Daumier - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Notable work of art. I also like the humour. Yann (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution and good quality, famous lithographer, famous photographer, inspiring drawing :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction of a famous caricature. – Aristeas (talk) 07:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 08:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мангистауская область, степной орёл.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 18:43:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)
Info created and uploaded by Ezra Sheyner - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is CA. Quality is good but not outstanding. The environment is also strange, this bird is not a fisher. Poco a poco (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI don't know if that is my problem,I found the bird's eyes are out of focus--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 16:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natursteinmauerwerk an einem Widerlager nummeriert für Wiedereinbau.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 12:51:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Walls
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Augustgeyler -- August Geyler (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral As nominator -- August Geyler (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RequestMay you explain more about what picture is telling?--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 16:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are asking about the Letters and signs? I don't know anything about them. The Arabic numbers were written on each stone for reinstallation. The historic wall (part of an old railway bridge) was demolished to build an new bridge with a new wall. To conserv this by law protected wall, the nummbers were added to be able to exactly rebuild it afterwards. August Geyler (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
understood that,and I Support--This is ghrkya who don't want to change this signature 02:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like some modernist artwork. It’s great that you have seen the beauty of this spot, it’s easy to overlook this. – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazinczy Ferenc utca in Gyor (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 10:33:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good QI, but not special enough. Rainy weather, closed umbrellas, trash bag. No wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the rainy weather, closed umbrellas and the trash bag all add to the scene. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-6-74-164-91 Friedhofskirche St Burkard (Langhaus).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2024 at 06:54:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but nothing special. Wolverine XI 22:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is too much noise, some halos, disturbing elements in the composition (esp. the steps on the left obscuring the window), humble decoration. Sorry, not a FP to me. Poco a poco (talk) 10:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]