Commons:特色图片评选

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

跳转至评选区

此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语，如果需要中文交流区，请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区。

特色图片评选

欢迎来到特色图片评选！社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一，即特色图片，每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云：“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像，请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识，图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录，你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述，请参阅我们的年度评选。

你可以：

增加一个新提名
查阅图像评估指南
了解现在的评选
重申特色图片
查看目前的除名
阅览特色图片评选标准
参阅目录

规范 edit

投票周期为10天，之后的投票将无效。
欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
提名者可以随时撤回提名。
每个注册用户都可以投票，匿名用户的票将不统计。
如果提名5天后没有支持票，该提名将提前结束。
通过的标准：至少5个支持票，支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
完成的投票保存在存档。
参见投票结束后操作指引。

提名 edit

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像，并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可，那么请按照如下步骤操作：

1. 按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg）在下方的文本框输入图像名称，然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名，请按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2）展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）进行。

2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。）

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区的顶端加入新内容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作：请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作：如果您不是图像的创建者，请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括号）。

注意，你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当！ edit

光暗度 edit

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候，投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示，它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个（甚至四个）圈子，那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子，你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数，故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话，也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度 edit

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图，图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合，你则须要调校你的伽玛设置（在电脑的输出设置上，而不在于屏幕显示），直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难，然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意，在液晶显示（无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕）上观看图片，你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要，请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Featured picture candidates edit

File:Bangkok - Rama VIII Bridge at sunrise Jan 2024.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 15:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Thailand
Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom (talk)
Support -- BigDom (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fringe-fingered Lizard.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 07:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Lacertidae (True Lizards)
Info created by Bill.pix - uploaded by Bill.pix - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice compo. and camouflage. -Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) (32532118720).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 23:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is very hard to find a good image for this species, especially when there are no featured pictures. The majority either didn't meet the guidelines or had very tight/bad crops. IMO, this is the best one I could find. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is that bait on the left? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I assume that it is the fish bait, just covered by the water splashing in front. The other pictures that did have the fish bait had bad crops. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's clearly not the best of the series, for the composition, quality, and angle of view. For example this one is better in my view. There are more -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 16:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info created and uploaded by W.carter, nominated by Yann
Info Looking straight up into the magenta Aurora Borealis over Tuntorp, Brastad, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. The aurora was the result of a G5 geomagnetic storm.
Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love this color. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 19:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It must be impressive to experience northern lights live. Fascinating picture! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What has caused posterization? Can it be sorted? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not questioning the camera settings, those seem perfectly reasonable. Is posterization also present in the raw file? If so, the issue is indeed due to camera limitations and there is not much that can be done without misrepresenting the aurora. However, in my own pictures I can only recall a couple that showed posterization on the original image. In all other instances posterization was caused by something I did during editing (e.g., clipping channels) or exporting (e.g., choosing the wrong colour space, using too much JPEG compression). --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not offended and I always appreciate advice, but there is simply not much I can do about my camera. It's like owning an old Saab and someone with a Ferrari is trying to give you tips on how to drive your old rust heap. ;-) You just feel stupid for parking next to such fab piece of machinery. I know my place, and it's outside this race track now. :-) --Cart (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The camera helps, but it doesn't make it all. The greatest pictures were taken with equipment way behind current technology. What's IMO most important is being at the right time at the right place, and having a bit of artistic genius or a human touch. And here you got it all, Cart! Yann (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's one of the great failures of FPC. I guess that a number of Pulitzer prizes or National Geographic pictures may fail here. This doesn't reduce the greatness of the pictures. It only shows the limitations of our community. Yann (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An image of almost other-worldly beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) attacking a fish lure ... (29723220133).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 15:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop at the tail, sorry. --iMahesh (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The copper chaser.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 14:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by IssamBarhoumi - uploaded by IssamBarhoumi - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @IssamBarhoumi: , what is the subject here? The person or his work?. --iMahesh (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support after the changes in description and file name. Now, its much clear. --iMahesh (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment dear iMahesh thank you -- IssamBarhoumi 19:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hi IssamBarhoumi, what a great photo! However, what he is doing is a bit mislabeled. What he is doing is not engraving, but it is very common for people outside the handicraft trade to know the difference. ;-) Engraving is when you cut away material to make patterns (no hammer involved for engraving metals). What he is doing is called chasing, part of the repoussé and chasing techniques used by copper, silver and goldsmiths. Chasing is when you hammer in a pattern into the material, and repoussé is when you hammer out patterns from the backside of the material. I have fixed up the description and the categories for you, but would you mind if the file was renamed too so that is showed the right profession. I'm so happy that we finally have a really good photo for the wiki articles and chasers on Wikidata. Coppersmiths often use many different techniques to make the patterns on their work, and the right terminology for all of them is not easy. Best, --Cart (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hi -- Cart I will rename the file and inform you when done --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great, all done now and I've fixed the code for your nomination to keep everything running as it should. --Cart (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment dear Cart thank you for all especially for giving me idea about the difference between the tow techniques -- IssamBarhoumi 19:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) Kruger.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info A number of FPs of varying quality. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --iMahesh (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TOUMOU (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Composition is not so good and only the front part of subject is in focus. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning light and angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi) head Malolotja.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:30:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support That white mark on his face reminds me something. --iMahesh (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support ★ 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish I could see more of his left eye, but who cares? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:013 Black-backed jackal in the Ngorongoro Crater Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tight crop at the right and at the bottom. But overall well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius, SB 23177 (1).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 10:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Louvre-Lens Museum Fragment of the Palace of Darius, SB 23177
all by me except the artwork!.--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Pierre André ^(talk) 10:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es-tu certain que la balance des blancs est correcte ici ? L'image semble un peu jaune.
Are you certain that the white balance is right here? It seems a bit yellow. Yann (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hydrangea petiolaris (klimhortensia), 05-03-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 04:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
Info Budding leaf bud of a Hydrangea anomala 'Petiolaris' Climbing hydrangea. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 36.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed_&_Groups
Info Group of Mundari kids with cow dong ashes (as antiseptic agains mosquitos) in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool. Yann (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 130.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 16:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Young Laarim woman with extensive scarification, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/m by Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! Yann (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo indeed. But ethically i can't agree to this photo. Exploiting innocence of indigenous people. Sorry --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Scarification may be a part of their culture and tradition. I just expressed my misgivings on exposing these kind of people in public. It's just my opinion. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, of course. They are proud of it, they must. They are innocent. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's your take, I don't share it at all. I see an interesting tradition here, not a person who is innocent Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the case using Google and Wikipedia. The place is some 180 km from Juba, the capital town, it is definitely not a city like London or Tokyo, but it is a town of 490 000+ population, it has airport, banks, schools and university, telecommunication company, TV and shops of electronics, churches of several confessions, etc. There is a school and a clinic in Kimotong. So, I do not think that they are so innocent to not understand the consequences of photography. And I agree that the photo has documentary value and encyclopedic value. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever heard about documentary photography? ★ 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are of course different degrees of innocense, but i seriously doubt that she is aware of how people with a scarification fetish will use this photo. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Who is "innocent" or "guilty" on Earth? No idea. But she has a striking look and wonderful colorful jewelry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Héron garde boeufs à Oued Mejerda.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Bubulcus
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ★ 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you have already voted. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info @ArionStar: Double voting has been disabled. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry… lol ★ 09:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lovely, but the legs are underfocused. Wolverine XI 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
in such light conditions (low light) you can only open the diaphragm to full aperture to have a decent image and obviously everything will not be in focus. You must always take the shooting conditions into account. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this.

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support In perfect light, the focus is sharp on the eye, which matters at this depth of field. More is not possible at f/4. An excellent capture in my view. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb shot as usual from JJ. Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. BigDom (talk) 03:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is no rule to have the whole subject in focus, and in many cases it is just impossible technically. The Image Guidelines state: "Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture", and there is the example photo of a cat with focus on eyes and shallow DOF. I consider this image in compliance with the Image Guidelines. Nice photo of interesting subject with "wow-effect" IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly agree with you. This issue should be addressed. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support At f4 with 1/100s while still beeing at ISO 6400 it must have been a very dark place. The photograph could not have been taken in a better way as smaller aperture (=more DoF) would have resulted in increased ISO. Also to me the most important thing to get in focus in animal photography is the eye and the bird eye is perfectly in focus. Focus stacking is usually impossible on birds as they tend to keep moving and I always find it quite impressive how JJ Harrisson manages shutter speeds of 1/100s with them -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree. And I have the same thoughts about JJ Harrisson photoes. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cart is right. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Duomo and Tower of Pisa at sunrise.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by MHoser - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support 2024 and we don't have any FPs of the Leaning Tower. Nice and different perspective, by the way. -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks amazing. --iMahesh (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Too many dust spots in the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lovely, but I have to agree that at least the most prominent dust spots need to be fixed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin and Aristeas: the author seems to be inactive, so I took the liberty of fixing the dust spots. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much, The Cosmonaut! – Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, that's surprising that we have no FPs of the Leaning Tower of Pisa. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas nautique du Monde edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
Info created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, very high-resolution, interesting document. Yann (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction of beautiful world map. I love the detailed invention of the Antarctic Mundus novus ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed! A fascinating mash-up of an accurate representation of the Brazilian coastline (taken from contemporary Portuguese nautical charts) with the made-up Terra Australis from the Ancient Greeks. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality and very interesting -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Lechwe.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:56:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
InfoA Red Lechwe at Port Lympne Wild Animal Park. Created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daftation (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop on 3 sides. Yann (talk) 11:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do you have an image where horns are not cropped? --iMahesh (talk) 15:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The horns have to be fully displayed. Wolverine XI 16:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a big fan of the crop. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Great posture and expression, sharp eye, beautiful OOF background. And while the crop on 3 sides is indeed unfortunate, it has the advantage that it makes the image look more intimate: looking at it I really feel face to face with the animal. – Aristeas (talk) 07:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pet Yann. -- Karelj (talk)

File:L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja

uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMHO, it would look much better if the plant in the bottom is not cropped and too much noise in the sky. --iMahesh (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Detail is lacking throughout the image. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose i am not sure what Wolverine thinks is wrong with the detail, this picture seems quite sharp to me. However, I miss an outstanding composition. The plant is awkwardly placed half cut-off at the bottom of the frame and I can't see an outstanding compositional idea in the landscape in general. Cmao20 (talk) 02:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colours Daftation (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spectacular light. ★ 12:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd honestly leave it as it is, wouldn't crop the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 16:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfectly executed. Wolverine XI 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 05:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Nice scene, but isn't it too dark? --Milseburg (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church Square Park Hoboken November 2021 001.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Stunning. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect, looks like an architectural render. --iMahesh (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like monopoly to me. Wolverine XI 16:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors of the trees are nice to look at -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PO boxes at the historic Chico Post Office (2024)-L1005460.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 23:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting and unusual subject, great find. There is a small amount of barrel and perspective distortion it seems? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Leica Super-Elmar 21mm has an extremely low amount of distortion (virtually close to none). Please keep in mind that it's an old building. Oh, also: a good friend showed me this view. If someone deserves credit for finding this gem, it's him. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Micha (talk) 09:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Considering how small the room is, it's amazing what a sublime effect it creates in the image. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating shot! I noticed a slight tilt to the right on the wall face, probably due to the building's age. Nevertheless, the composition is solid overall.. --iMahesh (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Река Коксу осенью 2.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 22:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
Info created by Marat Nadjibaev - uploaded by Marat Nadjibaev - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great scenery, enhanced by the long exposure. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful scenery. – Aristeas (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The blurred flamingo at left is a bit disturbing, but noise is fine. Please consider cropping. Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I cropped it, thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree a tighter crop would improve this image Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot crop it further to the left side of the photo otherwise the composition of the photo will be affected and unbalanced El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The left crop is something else. Wolverine XI 16:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Due to the crop. --iMahesh (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the new version with the only possible crop with a good composition El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. This is the best composition, but the image is now quite small. Yann (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Info Cropped by me. ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support. --iMahesh (talk) 01:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's an improvement -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mountain View Cemetery1.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Canada
Info: Boulder Mountain above the Mountain View Cemetery, Revelstoke, British Columbia; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Tettigoniidae_(Katydids_or_Bush_Crickets)
Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In my opinion you've gone too far with the colors. The greens appear like radioactive on my screen, and when I check the settings on Lightroom, I see you modified the "tint" (+18%), added whites +54%, and shadows +100%. The insect is sharp but the colors unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Basile Morin; the green color is way too much. Wolverine XI 16:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I uploaded a new version of the image with (hopefully) more natural colours. But you have to keep in mind that the picture was taken in bright morning sun light (with the subject in the shadow), which leads to bright colours. --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, sharpness etc. The green still looks very strong at the bottom, but after all this animal has got a very bright green colour – Linné has called it Tettigonia viridissima for a reason (viridissimus/a/um means “greenest”) ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks much better. I have cropped the dead spaces, please check. --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support now, thank you. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think you were not very lucky with the light but I enjoy the careful composition of this photo and the image quality is strong. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think this would benefit from increased vibrance, especially for the reds that are particularly washed out. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Cosmonaut Done, I tried replicating actual colors from images over internet.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. Thank you for the improvement. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Macrocallista nimbosa shell edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
Left Valve (Fossil, Lower Pleistocene, about 1 - 1.5 mio years old)
Right valve (Extant)
Left valve (Extant)

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
Info The set shows the shells (2 valves each) of two specimens of the same species. One shell, originating from the Lower Pleistocene, is about 1 - 1.5 million years old, the other is an extant specimen collected alive in 2003. Both specimens come from Florida; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 08:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casio W-96H.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. Daftation (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Honestly I preferred your last one, I found the colours and the background more interesting, but this is again good product photography and deserves a star. I understand that people might find it a little low on wow but that's a matter of the genre, still, I think it would be cool if we could feature good product photos like this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject is very easy to capture, so nothing worth featuring here. Wolverine XI 16:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info I would like to see, those who oppose to make similar. Wolverine "easy". I think you never made something like this, so oppose is irrelvant, who made them would never say easy. Stacked Macro shots are heavy work. Some 5-6 h of work,cleaning, editing stack mistakes, which are normal. Show me "easy" shot. please. --Mile (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my responsibility to prove myself to anyone, so think what you must. And please, don't take things personally. Wolverine XI 07:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I could only duplicate Cmao20’s words. And no, high-quality product photos like this one are absolutely not easy: this is very much work. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coup de foudre et bateaux amarrées aux cotes de la Galite.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 14:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Lightning
Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture. Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 22:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a shot! --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Impressive but it would nice to get rid of the green lines around the rock below the lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin Fixed green chromatic aberration Atef Ouni (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think there is a bit of camera movement, but overall the immense wow factor and strong composition makes this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool shot! Красный ^{wanna talk?} 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support IMO a bit oversaturated but I really like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20 Thanks for the support and feedback - only +2 saturation in PS but happy to dial it back if others feel the same. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Cmao20 it's oversaturated. Green leaves, blue water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20, ArionStar, and Красный: Thanks for the feedback. I've tweaked the saturation of the blue, green and aqua channels, looks a bit more natural now IMO. Let me know if it needs any more work, always happy to get constructive criticism. BigDom (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Water is improved in my opinion. Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Residential by Carrer Sant Josep in Finestrat, Alicante, Spain, 2024 January.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
Info A really unusual composition but I like it a great deal. created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting compo. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the composition, although there are some strange contours around the leafs. --Micha (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice place. It’s often very difficult to find a satisfying composition in such narrow corners; here this was achieved with real success. – Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moosheide im herbstlichen Morgenlicht (1).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 03:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
Info IMO a really beautiful composition. created by GZagatta - uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great lights and composition, but there is vignating isn't it ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The solitary tree creates a wonderful mood of hope in the scenery. The slight vignetting emphasizes this, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light Daftation (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Bonda tribe of Odisha drinking Mahua drink.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
Info created and uploaded by Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi - nominated by iMahesh -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- iMahesh (talk) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ǃǃ Terragio67 (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 23:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Year of Africa probably. --Mile (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PetarM: Thanks for the review, but that's from India and yes they are part of the first wave of migration from Africa about 60,000 years ago. --iMahesh (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should atleast respect the author by giving space and time to respond, please dont take everything into your hands unless I ask to. Search engines provide enough data but respect the owner of the picture to thank or share the gratitude too. Very weird and immature behaviour @IM3847 Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@IM3847 Is it still my picture or you owned it?, Im very much confused with these kind of comments. Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relax, it's not that deep. Wolverine XI 16:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you say so… Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: No, that's not how things work. You released it under the CC-BY SA 4.0 license; now you have to live with the consequences. IM3847's behaviour is certainly not "weird and immature", but it does reflect your behaviour. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000 Lets not get personal. He is new to Wikimedia commons and needs time to understand how process works. I should have created another filepage under his authorship and uploaded sharpened images over there. But since it will confuse the author seeing two different filepages, I choose to upload the new version. Anyway I should be placing a message on talk pages of Professional photographers from next time, before upgrading their photos. I have anyway created and added a this template to his userpage, so other users cannot rewrite the original version Mr. Suresh uploaded for the Wiki Loves Folklore photo contest. --iMahesh (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000 And since there is a Conflict of Interest between us, can someone please nominate his other two images 01 and 02 for Featured Picture Candidates as well. They look amazing and has a great potential to be the best we get here in India. --iMahesh (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IM3847: Please do not edit other people's messages because you disagree with the tone. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000: Understood, won't edit others' messages. Thanks for the reminder. -- iMahesh (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment According to the guidelines, nominated images should not have signatures in the picture: "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." It was added during the nomination process. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to SHB2000 for restoring the latest version. @Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi: You should also restore your other two photos that were already marked as quality images. Not only did you add a signature, but you also reduced the resolution so much that both images are only a few kilobytes in size due to very low resolution and high compression: Photos 01 and 02. Pictures that have already been tagged (QI, FP or VI) cannot be modified in this way. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad they released their content under a CC license if they didn't want their photos to be edited this way. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi, per above, watermarks are not allowed on QI or FPC or FP images. Please revert to the original version. If you don't want anyone to edit your photos in overwrites, please use messages on the file page instead. Take a look at this photo and this one to see what such texts and templates can look like. --Cart (talk) 09:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garo people at khagrachori 04.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 06:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info Uploaded by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No wow and technically not one of the best. --Micha (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oroville State Theatre during blue hour (2024)-L1005456.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 21 May 2024 at 05:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere. Wolverine XI 08:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The pink light is a special element in the composition. ★ 13:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support The lights are beautiful and the pink and blue colors together are also beautiful here and the accuracy in the crop of the image is even more decisive. I wish I had taken this photo. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An outstanding photograph that makes the viewer believe that the great era of American Art déco has returned. The light, angle, composition, and timing are perfect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I usually find this style kitschy, but it is great here. Yann (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:048 Lioness during golden hour of the morning at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Inspirational. Wolverine XI 08:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazing Stories, November 1928.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 18:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Magazine and newspaper illustrations in color
Info created by Amazing Stories, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really cool artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- I'm not absolutely happy with the colors, but the view is really breathtaking. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barque sur une mer de sel à Chott Jrid.jpg, featured edit

Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 06:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality. Daftation (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Oversaturated? ★ 12:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, saturation updated :) Atef Ouni (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poetic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a better image after deciding to desaturate it. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning subject and composition. Image quality not perfect but doesnt matter because it's so lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding composition. --iMahesh (talk) 15:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Tunisia

File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Please fix the chromatic aberrations visible around the stones and the wall at the bottom right -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sur Lightroom, "Pinceau" (sélection) -> "Supprimer la frange" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai pas lightroom. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de problème. Voir lien ci-dessus -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 21:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photographers in Rabat.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 17:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it would be better without the two standing figures behind the photographers, but still good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support that standing fellows. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment So this was taken without the subjects knowing they were photographed? —kallerna (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment Probably yes. Sometimes you do the same, right? --A.Savin 09:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment —kallerna I would still say spontaneous shot, not planed. For candid, i would think bushmans with extra zoom, hiding and waiting some superstar by pool next house, so they know what are they waiting and probably know what kind of photo will they get. --Mile (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice typical tourists scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Funny but too busy compostion. It would work without the guy passing by in the background, with his finger on his nose. He seems embarrassed to be in the frame. The two ladies behind are also distracting. And the wall at the right has nothing special. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I like the idea and it's a good candid shot of the photographers, very natural. I don't mind the wall on the right which adds to the candid nature, making you feel like you're watching these photographers from round a corner. But the people in the background, especially the man, are just too distracting for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Average composition when taking background into account. --Thi (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile and others. Yann (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile and BigDom. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The guy bombs the photo, unfortunately. Wolverine XI 21:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Theyyam, the dancing God, is a ritual art form of Kerala. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again, not an FP with this crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to say.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose some of the drummers are difficult to see against the background. Could be fixed with editing. Schierbecker (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tried my level best. Since it is a lowlight photography hard to remove shadows. Now please watch. If somebody helps to improve more i will send the original file on email.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Heavy noise reduction and tight framing but the masquerade is fascinating. Ermell (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
Info Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east wall, with a height of 2400 m the highest mountain wall in the Alps; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice compo. Wolverine XI 03:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view of the highest mountain wall in the Alps (see nomination). – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. --Micha (talk) 09:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scarlet Veil (51013483841).jpg edit

Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Charlie Marshall, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by ~~Yann~~ SHB2000
Support Perfect composition. -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann as uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We already have a similar FP of the same woman. ★ 13:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the other one is better, but this one is sufficiently different also to make FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I withdraw my nomination~~ Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know I live in a hurry, but you should wait a little longer. ★ 21:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; at least I can take over the nomination if you [Yann] want. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it has a chance now, but I am OK with you talking over. Thanks for offering. Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Code fixed for SHB2000 taking over the nom. Good luck! --Cart (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support No problems with two coexisting FPs of her. ★ 18:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cart! SHB2000 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality of the existing FP is much better. Compare the eyes, the nose and the mouth. Also too similar to the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nah, this image is not what we need in an FP. The composition is underwhelming, the quality is subpar and the crop is OK, I guess. Sorry for not supporting, but hey, that's life. Wolverine XI 17:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Prefer the existing FP - this is nice, but not outstanding like the other. BigDom (talk) 13:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2024 -- 4263-7.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite an unusual perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree, but a nice light, though Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann. --.Karelj (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I have been going back and forth on this but I am not sure the composition really works. It feels like the wheel is a bit of an afterthought, placed at the edge of the frame. I think it would have worked better with more wheel and less OOF background Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blurry background covers too much of the picture, while the wheel only covers a portion too small for my liking. --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support A very interesting and unusual composition, probably too unusual for us. It reminds me of some paintings which show a person looking at a distant landscape or town; in these paintings the nominal subject is that distant object, but they emphasize the person in order to allow the viewers to identify themselves with that person; so in some regard the real subject is the contemplation of the person who looks at that distant object (example). I vaguely remember some photographs which use the same approach, but combine it with a key feature of photography (the interplay of sharp and unsharp) by putting the focus on the person and throwing the landscape/town out of focus, still keeping it recognizable. Now in this photograph the wheel plays the role of the front person; the standing wheel seems to contemplate the great past and presence of that big industrial area. I guess my explanation is lengthy and unclear, but on these lines the composition actually works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the detailed, yet rather unusual review. I think it's very positive that my intention for the photo is clear. --XRay 💬 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Won't work for me. I cannot tell what the content is, Daftation (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition and black subject don't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing spectacular. Wolverine XI 17:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Erzbunker -- 2024 -- 4214.jpg edit

Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice frame, but the reflective portion is not--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost as beautiful as an Egyptian temple.--Ermell (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating, artistic composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special, imo. An elegance of simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I do not understand the composition. Nice light though. —kallerna (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do understand the composition. It is special and the execution is excellent. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Himmeldunkberg Gipfelkreuz II.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 15:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info Summit cross on the Himmeldunkberg. In the background on the right the Kreuzberg. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Makes me feel cold just to look at it Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Support Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Temporarily changing my supporting vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is resolved. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Snow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good catch, Radomianin. I have taken the liberty to embed the sRGB profile with ExifTool. @Milseburg: This is just a little help, especially if you do not want to edit the image anymore; embedding a colour profile with ExifTool is a lossless operation and has no impact on the image data itself, so your image was not changed by this at all. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not a usual sight from Germany. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I miss wow here. I like snowed landscapes, but preferably with virgin and white (I concur with Frank) snow, not the case here. I also find the crop at the top too tight. I believe that there was FP potential here but I just see a cross that cannot breath at the top, trampled grey snow and a bit of mountains. Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It works fine for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A wonderful view (I can only agree with Radomianin’s first comment); however I have to admit that the whites could be whiter – I have tried it, adjusting the white point makes the whole image even better. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Impressive landscape but as others have said, the white balance is off and the placement of the cross feels a little awkward. BigDom (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Whites are much better. I still find the placement of the cross a little too distracting for FP, but not enough to oppose. BigDom (talk) 14:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree with Frank Schulenburg.Ermell (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Cmao20, Radomianin, ArionStar, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, SHB2000, Famberhorst, Agnes Monkelbaan, Llez, Poco a poco, Sebring12Hrs, Kallerna, BigDom, Ermell, and MZaplotnik: Sorry for my absence and thank you for the reviews and criticism. I tried to take this to heart, washed the snow and uploaded a new version. Better and sufficient? --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you very much for the revision, Milseburg. Your editing has significantly improved the picture. I have restored my original supporting vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Milseburg! – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support неплохо. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive like a painting, in my opinion. Thanks for the image improvement, Argenberg. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The light is great and the scene spectacular, but I personally haven't understood the composition. It isn't working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit noisy, but great light and composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco, too busy composition IMO. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support TOUMOU (talk) 07:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#India