User talk:AStiasny/Archive 01

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, AStiasny!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 12:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear AStiasny, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:27, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Danke, und Bitte (wie könnte es anders sein)

Hallo Andreas, ich sehe schon eine ganze Weile, wie du dich jetzt im Speziellen an der Kategorisierung der Denkmalbilder beteiligst, danke dafür. Ich nehme an, die beziehst die Bilder aus der Liste der noch nicht als Denkmal in der passenden Gemeinde kategorisierten Bilder. Darf ich dich da weiter um deine Mitarbeit ersuchen? Wenn du neue Kategorien zu Objekten (z.B. Kirchen) unterhalb der Gemeindeebene machst, wäre es dienlich, wenn du diese auch in den passenden Denkmallisten unter commonscat vermerken könntest. Als Beispiel vielleicht Enzesfeld mit seiner Bürgerspitalkirche. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, danke für den Hinweis. An sich ist mir der Zusammenhang bekannt und ich trage die Kategorie normalerweise auch ein. Bei der Bürgerspitalskirche habe ich es entweder übersehen oder ich wurde durch einen Anruf abgelenkt. Habe heute auch schon Commonscats eingetragen. Catscan habe ich bisher nicht verwendet. Begonnen habe ich mit dem Kategorisieren neben eigenen Bildern mit den Objekten von de:Benutzer:Multichill/Unused_Denkmal_Österreich. Dann habe ich begonnen, die Listen der denkmalgeschützen Objekte der Gemeinden meines Heimatbezirks durchzusehen, ob ich die verlinkten Bilder besser kategorisieren kann, was teilweise der Fall war. Beim Vergeben neuer Kategorien schaue ich meist, was dort schon drinnen ist und finde dann auch oft weitere Betätigungsfelder (Verschieben in Unterkategorien, Vergeben von Sortierschlüsseln, etc.). Ich werde damit sicherlich weiter machen, auch wenn ich in den nächsten Monaten weniger Zeit dafür haben werde. LG -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 888dc83bfeb443f96855cc9f5904dc1d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

2-Bild-Kategorien

Hallo, ich sehe, dass du gerne 2-Bild-Kategorien anlegst [1]. Hat es wirklich einen Sinn in einem "Bilderbuch" wo ein Kapitel an sich noch sehr überschaubar ist [2] die Bilder in 2-Bild-Kategorien zu verstecken? Bwag (talk) 09:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Bwag, so gerne habe ich diese kleinen Kategorien auch nicht, aber ich sehe es als einzige Möglichkeit, auf den Listen der denkmalgeschützten Objekte eine Kategorie angeben zu können, damit erstens Betrachter auf einfache Weise weitere Bilder des Objektes finden können und zweitens weitere hochgeladene Bilder automatisch in diese Kategorie einsortiert werden. Es ist natürlich denkbar, dass man die höherliegende Kategorie trotzdem drinnen lässt und die Bilder dann im aktuellen Fall sowohl unter "Loretto" als auch unter "Pieta Dorfplatz Loretto" aufscheinen. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 09:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Danke für die Antwort. Und zum neugierigen Betrachter. Am einfachsten findet er sie so - denke ich zumindest. Bwag (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

nur so

Zu diesem Edit: [3]. Der Kahlenberger Friedhof ist ein wenig weit weg. Korrekte Katbezeichnung wäre in meinen Augen: Figurenbildstock hl. Johannes Nepomuk, Kahlenberger Straße . Bwag (talk) 21:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Bwag, danke für den Hinweis. Jedoch habe ich diese Ortsbezeichnung nicht frei erfunden. In der Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Döbling steht als verbale Adresse "bei Kahlenberger Friedhof" und in der Liste_der_Johannes-Nepomuk-Darstellungen_in_Wien steht neben der Angabe "Josefsdorf" auch nur "oberhalb des Kahlenberger Friedhofs". Da auch eines der Bilder, die ich in diese Kategorie einsortiert habe eine ähnliche Bezeichnung trägt, war das für mich die am häufigsten verwendete Angabe und somit habe ich sie für den Kategorienamen genommen. Aber wenn es dir wichtig ist, kann ich die Kategorie gerne neu anlegen und die alte löschen lassen. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 06:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

OK, vielleicht ist die Friedhofsangabe sogar besser, sind ja nur 100, 200 Meter bis dahin, jedoch die Angabe des Straßennamens würde sogar eine Strecke von rd. 0,5 Kilometer umfassen. Gruß Bwag (talk) 17:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear AStiasny, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Prüfung der Bilder von WLM 2013

Hallo AStiasny, danke für die Beteiligung an der Abarbeitung der WLM 2013 Bilder. Die Vorgehensweise hat sich an einer Stelle geändert: Die Kategorie Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Austria needing check bitte nicht einfach löschen, sondern nach Prüfung durch Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Austria check done ersetzen. Sonst schlagen die Bilder wieder bei der Prüfung auf (CatScan). --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

OK danke, wird gemacht. --Andreas Stiasny (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Deine Unterteilung der Category:Orphanages in Austria

Hallo AStiasny! Deine Unterteilung der Category:Orphanages in Austria macht mich ziemlich unglücklich. Es wäre mir lieber, wenn die österreichischen Kinderheime alle in einer Kategorie bleiben könnten, da die Aufteilung der Kategorie nach Bundesländern aufgrund der Organisation der Heime nicht sinnvoll ist. Es betreiben und betrieben Bundesländer Heime in anderen Bundesländern (ganz besonders Wien), wie das Beispiel Eggenburg sehr schön zeigt (siehe das Wappen über dem Eingang). Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 23:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Häferl, ich habe hier keine Unterteilung angelegt, sondern nur Dateien in bereits bestehende Bundesländer-Kategorien verschoben (im konkreten Fall waren es zwei Bilder aus Wien). Es sind noch nicht so viele Einträge vorhanden, dass eine Aufteilung nötig wäre, ich finde es aber falsch, etwas unter XXXX in Austria zu kategorisieren, wenn es eine passende Unterkategorie XXXX in Bundesland gibt. LG --Andreas Stiasny (talk) 06:40, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Hallo AStiasny! Ich hatte nur gesehen, daß Du welche verschoben hast und dachte, Du würdest das jetzt mit allen machen. ;-) Wobei ich eine Aufteilung nach betreibenden Bundesländern trotzdem sinnvoller finden würde, aber das kann ich ja einmal zusätzlich machen. Und entschuldige bitte die späte Antwort! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear AStiasny,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Blessed_sacrament_churches_in_Austria

Category:Blessed_sacrament_churches_in_Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Theodoxa (talk) 09:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi AStiasny, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

– Kwj2772 (talk) 06:57, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

aarg, :-)

da waren wir beide zu schnell, mea culpa. Bitte File:Busta do Manoel Gustavo Schier, Clube Literário do Portão, Curitiba.jpg erneut verschieben auf File:Busto de Manoel Gustavo Schier, Clube Literário do Portão, Curitiba.jpg, Grammatikfehler meinerseits. obrigado, --Turíbio Branco (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Ist erledigt :-) --Andreas Stiasny (talk) 15:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adit mouth of the emperor Franz Josef drift at the salt mine in Hallstatt, Upper Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche Ramsau, Lower Austria view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

SD in "File:Willy Prager (BerlLeben (1906-10).jpg"

Hallo @AStiasny: Danke für Deine Rückmeldung bzgl. des SD in File:Willy Prager (BerlLeben (1906-10).jpg. Da dies meine ersten SDs in Commons waren, würde mich das geauer interessieren, warum für diese Weiterleitungen keine Löschung erfolgt. Mir würde das sofort einleuchten, wenn noch irgendwo ein Link auf diesen alten Namen existiert. Das habe ich aber überprüft (mit der Funktion am linken Bildrand), es gibt keine Links auf die Weiterleitung. Welche anderen Gründe siehst Du? Danke und VG --Bicycle Tourer (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Offensichtlich ist gerade eine Löschung erfolgt, trotzdem würden mich Deine Gründe interessieren. Dein Kommentar war "Behalten This redirect exists because of a renaming of the image. Such redirects should almost never be deleted and are not eligible for speedy deletion. -- Andreas Stiasny (Diskussion) 22:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)" (kommt man jetzt nach der Löschung nicht mehr dran). Danke und VG --Bicycle Tourer (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @Bicycle Tourer: die Weiterleitung File:Willy Prager (BerlLeben (1906-10).jpg und die Löschdiskussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:Willy Prager (BerlLeben (1906-10).jpg sind noch da. Die Gründe, warum Weiterleitungen nach Umbenennungen nicht gelöscht werden sollen, sind hier Commons:File redirects und in den Fußnoten dort erklärt. Zusammengefasst:

Es kann jede Menge Links zum alten Namen der Datei geben, die nicht innerhalb von Commons angezeigt werden (regionale Wikis, beliebige MediaWiki-Installationen oder andere Websites, ältere Versionen von Wikipedia-Seiten) und das Behalten der Weiterleitungen kostet nichts. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 08:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Noch was: Fünf Einträge weiter oben hier auf meiner Commons-Diskussionsseite ist die Willkommensnachricht für neue Dateiverschieber. Einer der Hinweise darin ist, dass man keine Weiterleitungen für SD vorschlagen soll. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 13:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @AStiasny: Danke für die Erläuterung und den Link. Und ja, jetzt habe ich es verstanden. Ich hatte rund 10 Bilder in den letzten 8 Wochen verschoben und wollte "final aufräumen". Keine gute Idee. Leider wurden die anderen SD-Anträge inzwischen alle durchgeführt (damit habe ich es oben offensichtlich auch verwechselt, sorry), so dass ich da nichts mehr zurückziehen kann. In die Löschdiskussion habe ich inzwischen eingetragen, dass ich den Löschantrag zurückziehe. Muss ich den Löschantrag auch noch in der Weiterleitung selbst löschen (so wie das in de:WP bei LAZ/LAE der Fall wäre)? Dazu habe ich nichts gefunden. Sorry für den Aufwand, den ich Euch damit gemacht habe. Danke und VG --Bicycle Tourer (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @Bicycle Tourer: Ich würde das jetzt einfach den normalen Weg gehen lassen. Vielleicht beteiligt sich noch jemand an der Diskussion und nach einiger Zeit wird ein Admin über Löschen oder Behalten entscheiden. Das Thema wird ja mitunter auch kontroversiell diskutiert. Solange man darüber diskutiert ist das ja auch OK. Ich wollte nur eine Schnelllöschung verhindern. Ich wüsste jetzt auch nicht, wie man einen Löschantrag löschen könnte. VG -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

OK, danke für die Info und Hilfe, dann lasse ich es so. VG --Bicycle Tourer (talk) 17:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Die Löschdiskussion ist geschlossen. Die Weiterleitung wurde behalten. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 09:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Festung Hohensalzburg seen from the East.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --BoothSift 23:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Hohensalzburg von Nordost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		Working Man's Barnstar
		I hereby award you, Andreas a.k.a User:AStiasny the Working Man's Barnstar for your tirelesst work you're doing in Quality images categorization. Thank you! Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you George, this is very nice and unexpected. --Andreas Stiasny (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Good work worthy of gratitude.

You can copy this Barnstar to your user page. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior view of parish church Altaussee, Styria, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meets all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Fluffy89502 ~ talk 00:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Epstein/Rainer in Baden, Lower Austria, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AStiasny/Archive 01,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AStiasny/Archive 01,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi AStiasny/Archive 01,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Rename

Hello, thank you for renaming File:Hendrick Hudson (1906 steamboat)) 02.jpg, but as you can see, you left a double bracket after the word "steamboat". Could you fix that please? Gatoclass (talk) 03:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello Gatoclass, I have just renamed the file to the name you have suggested. I didn't notice the second closing parenthesis. Otherwise I would have removed it. I have fixed it now. In such a case it is usually the easiest if you make another renaming request. -- Andreas Stiasny (talk) 07:14, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Andreas :) Gatoclass (talk) 00:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Gabriele Vianello plays for Ignis Varese v All'Onestà Milano.jpg

Hi. Now it's ok...? — danyele 17:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hallstatt, Infotafel beim Simony-Denkmal.jpg

File:Hallstatt, Infotafel beim Simony-Denkmal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 17:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Renaming St. Michael church files

Please, resolve (rename) the rest... Current status is inconsistency. --Obsuser (talk) 08:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Gorgosaurus Royal Tyrrell 2.jpg

File:Gorgosaurus Royal Tyrrell 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Evanyu35outlookcom.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kreuzwegkapelle I (Hallstatt), exterior view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. I think I'd use "exterior," though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baden Villa Epstein 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dirt spot in the sky and green CAs to remove. --Steindy 18:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)  Done OK, thanks. I was thinking that the dirt spot would be a distant bird but removing didn't hurt. --AStiasny 12:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Zöldi Márton szobra, Orbán Dezső szobrász, Uj Idők 1918.jpg

Lieber AStiasny! Vielen Dank für die schnelle Korrektur des falschen Dateinamens (Dezső Orbán ⇒ Antal Orbán)! :-)) --Bizottmány (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Gutmann in Baden, Lower Austria, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 December 2021 (UTC)