User talk:AnRo0002/2018

Archiv: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Stop using default sort on my files

I'm going to just remove it from every file you've added it to. If you want to sort categories you add, then do it individually.Famartin (talk) 15:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

ok. anro (talk) 16:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Don't rename my files unless

they are technically incorrect. I'm moving them back. Famartin (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Lentinus brumalis

You have wrongly and incorrectly changed the file name. See Index Fungorum. Polyporus brumalis is a synonym. Selso (talk) 17:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

it is a synonym but Polyporus brumalis is the usual latin name --anro (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

File renaming

Please take a look at what Criterion 3 says:"This criterion does not, however, cover moving a file from its common usage name to its scientific or technical name.". Accordingly, your moves, unless the common names are palpably incorrect, are contrary to that guideline. If you think the guideline is wrong, please seek amendment at the talk page, but until consensus is reached, please don't rename any more files unnecessarily. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

• Re File:Ink caps and candlesnuff fungi - geograph.org.uk - 1035615.jpg. You've just done it again. You're an Admin here and should be setting an example by following guidelines, not ignoring them. If you do it again I shall be forced to impose a block to prevent this kind of behaviour. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Umbenennung

Hallo, ich bitte darum, in Zukunft solche Umbenennungen zu unterlassen oder zumindest den Dateinamen bis zum Datum zu belassen. --Magnus (talk) 16:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Template-hilfe

Hallo AnRo. Hier sehe ich zweimal Siegen-Wittgenstein, ·aber im diesbezüglichen Template-Vorshau nicht. Ich weiss nicht wie ich das lösen soll. Einmal würde ja völlig reichen. Danke. MfG Peli (talk) 13:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

irgendwer hat in der vorlage "in the Kreis xy" für sämtliche Landkreise in NRW eingeführt, was ich für Schwachsinn halte, aber ich will jetzt keinen Edit-War beginnen --anro (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Please explain your edit

Hi, could you please provide an explanation for this revert. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

sorry, i would not edit - but i wonder about the edits concerning "the Kreis xy" --anro (talk) 20:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

I have no idea what this means.... —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Spring_2018

Spring 2018 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

@Auntof6 botanically spring 2018 begun in this year already in January! --anro (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Then you might want to comment on the CFD, although I think the spring categories are defined by the calendar, not by botanical criteria. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Spring_in_winter

Category:Spring_in_winter has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 10:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File moves

Hi,

Please can you not suppress the redirect when moving files from a lengthy if imprecise name to a more precise one (such as File:Fungus - geograph.org.uk - 402904.jpg to File:Amanita sp. - geograph.org.uk - 402904.jpg)? Deletion of these redirects adds no value, and can cause potential issues for re-users.--Nilfanion (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Ok i will include redirects in future also of images which are nowhere used. --anro (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Commons is not just for Wikipedia, and files may be used elsewhere. We can't know for certain that they genuinely unused.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Whoops… and how many links to images were destroyed in this way? @Rodhullandemu: did you see this section too? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

no links within wikipedia will be destroyed by file moves - the option to sopress redirect is only possible with unused images --anro (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

And how many outside Wikipedia? Can you be certain that is zero? No - then don't do it.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

I have already stopped to tupress redirects and I will not rename files -common names - to scientific in future --anro (talk) 22:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Wrong — Special:MovePage may suppress redirect for any file (sorry for beans). And again, Commons serves all the Internet, not only Wikimedia Empire. We can’t effectively search for Web pages depending on a particular file, and even less can we repair respective <img src="https://commons…"/>. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

but this option I will never use! --anro (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Last warning

You are still renaming files to scientific names contrary to the guidelines. This will stop. It's perfectly OK to rename, e.g. "fungi" to a more precise scientific name, but not common names to scientific names. I don't want to block a fellow admin, but I shall do so if you continue. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

what do you think abour renaiming to scientific names but keeping the common names behind? --anro (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Why move them at all? In many cases, use of the common name gives a more natural title. "File:Fly agaric in woodland near Glasgow.jpg" is just as accurate, and more familiar to English speakers, than "File:Amanita muscaria in woodland near Glasgow.jpg".

A file like "File:Red mushroom in woodland near Glasgow.jpg" is vague, so a rename under criterion 3 is good. The redirect should be kept.

A file like "File:Amanita phalloides in woodland near Glasgow.jpg", which actually shows A. muscaria, should be renamed - and no redirect left behind.

All the above refer to English-language file names. However, the same principles should apply to all languages. Renaming "Мухомор красный, Москва" to "Amanita muscaria, Moscow" is explicitly against policy. Renaming it to "Amanita muscaria, Москва" feels worse to me, with the awkward mix of scripts.--Nilfanion (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Editing files

this edition is unnecessary - there are no differences Selso (talk) 17:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

the difference is - it comes in the correct alphabetic order within the categories --anro (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Idiotic categories

Fungi of Poland, Fungi of France (generally: Fungi by country) - these are idiotic categories. Mushrooms are categorized according to taxonomy, not country and other administrative units. The fungus of a given species is the same in Poland as in France. Often the same species occurs in dozens of countries - and everywhere is the same. There are about 10,000 species of mushrooms in Poland, and the kifs can have many pictures - how many photos will be in the Polish Mushrooms category? Selso (talk) 07:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

@Selso: there is Commons:Categories for discussion. Solution for such a problem may not be based on some user_talk discussion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

with this argument you may also consider any else categories about nature - eg. flora, animals, minerals, fossils etc. by country as idiotic --anro (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

eg. flora, animals, minerals, fossils etc. by country as idiotict - such categories are good in the articles (checklist) - in the pictures no (the given plant species is the same in Poland as elsewhere). Selso (talk) 10:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

File:20180414Silene dioica.jpg

Hi! I'm sure it's not Silene dioica, but some Lunaria, maybe Lunaria annua. Salicyna (talk) 16:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Ok. thanks @Salicyna anro (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo AnRo0002,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Category:Seasons_by_year

Seasons by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Huvudskärs cementfabrik

Good evening,

I'm curious about the category category:Huvudskärs cementfabrik (Huvudskär cement factory) you created. The remote island is a very unlikely place for a factory. Did you have more information about the factory and a source?--ArildV (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

god kväll, ArildV - I createt this category due to the images, but I am not shure, if this was a cement fabrik

idiom Varma hälsningar! anro (talk) 17:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

I understand but it is (most likely) remains of the former coastal defence facility on the island. Huvudskär was (like many islands in the archipelago) a restricted military area during the cold war. Best regards --ArildV (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

File:20180607Bromus sterilis3.jpg

On the picture (and others from the same location) is Bromus tectorum not Bromus sterilis. Kenraiz (talk) 20:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Machine_manufacturers_of_Germany

Machine manufacturers of Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

37.201.215.150 01:53, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

COM:OVERCAT

You should mind COM:OVERCAT when doing mass category moves. --A.Savin 16:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Too complex Lepidoptera categories

Hi AnRo0002, may I kindly request that you slow down with the creation of increasingly precise Lepidoptera-related cross-categories? For example, in Category:Nymphalidae of Germany and Category:Nymphalidae of Austria, I see that you have created some "[Family] in [Landkreis]", some "[Species] in [country]" (which we never do for any other country), and even some "[Species] in [region]"! These all look like bad ideas, for at least 2 reasons:

• They are not useful: these categories are almost empty and they only make the pictures less accessible than before. Categorization is about grouping, not hiding.
• The added complexity will make maintenance even more difficult; for example, even you don't seem to notice that you broke the existing categorization by not linking the "[Species] in [region]" to their respective "[Species]" categories...

Please, refrain from creating new categories of this kind. Infinite complexity should not be the goal. Thank you in advance. --LamBoet (talk) 09:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Category "Flora of Gramschatzer Wald"

Es wurden von Dir hier nur Blumenbilder eingestellt - müsste die Category dann nicht besser heißen "Flowers of ..."?

Viele meiner Bilder im Gramschatzer Wald wurden im Stadtwald Arnstein (nördlich angrenzend an den gemeindefreien Staatswald) aufgenommen - ist es dann nicht falsch, wenn sie auch der Category "Flora of Landkreis Würzburg" erscheinen? --Bonnlander (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Flora of ist grundsätzlich besser als flowers of da offen für alle Pflanzenbilder. Dass da jetzt nur Blütembilder drin sind kann sich ja noch ändern. Und neben Flora of Landkreis Würzburg erschent die Kategorie ja auch unter Flora of Landkreis Main-Spessart --anro (talk) 16:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Bilderwunsch Amtsgericht Saarbrücken

Hallo und vielen Dank für deine Bilder vom Landgericht Saarbrücken. Hast du auch Fotos vom Amtsgericht Saarbrücken? Dessen Gebäude befindet sich in unmittelbarer Nähe zum Landgericht. Auf deinem Bild ist es ganz rechts zu erkennen. Viele Grüße--Marcel Rogge (talk) 12:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo AnRo0002,

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:20180826Sedum acre3.jpg

File:20180826Sedum acre3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kenraiz (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Map template for Canada

Why did you replace {{CanadaYear|maps|YYY|Y}} with {{MapsCanada|YYY|Y}} on all [[Category:YYYY maps of Canada]]? This change wasn't necessary, and if the previous template was lacking, it could have easily been extended (the only change I see is adding "works" and removing "maps of North America").

Likewise, the decade categories could use {{CanadaDecade}} instead of a map-dedicated {{CanadaMapsDecade}}; this was on my todo list, but since I hadn't done this yet, I won't belabour the point for the decade categories. Mindmatrix 13:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

it is to show the pages without "red links" and a map of Canada createt in the year xxxx is not necessarilary a work created in Canada --anro (talk) 13:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Sure, but I already stated that the template {{CanadaYear}} could have been updated. I'm asking why you replaced it. Mindmatrix 16:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Wrong identification of plant species

On pictures 20180912Jasione montana1.jpg, 20180912Jasione montana2.jpg, 20180912Jasione montana2.jpg there is Knautia arvensis, not Jasione montana. Could you change files names and categorisation? Kenraiz (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

ok, yo're right - i will change it tomorrow --anro (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Houses_in_the_United_States_built_in_1975

Houses in the United States built in 1975 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mjrmtg (talk) 19:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Änderung einer Category

Hallo @AnRo0002: Deine Änderung [1]Warum ordnest du eine Leihgabe aus Baden-W., die befristet zu einer Bonner Museumsausstellung gezeigt wurde, im die Cat NRW ein? Gruß --HOWI (talk) 08:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

ah, ich dachte es wäre eine Dauerleihgabe. Ich schicks wieder zurück nasch BaWü --anro (talk) 09:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

OK,--HOWI (talk) 09:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Schlosspark Schwetzingen

Hallo,

Weiss du wie heisst das? Ich habe problem mit Kategorie.

Mit freundliche Grüsse
Zwiadowca ²¹
Wollin - Heidelberg
15:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Das ist eine der vier Wetzeit-Wasen. siehe Category:Weltzeitvasen (Schwetzingen)

--anro (talk) 15:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Vachellia not acceptable to me

Vachellia not acceptable to me. Please don't change those file names (at least if I uploaded them). I follow Leslie Pedley, as all sensible persons who respect due process, so Senegalia is good, but Vachellia not. cf. Vachellia erioloba, habitus, Steenbokpan, a.jpg, Vachellia erioloba, habitus, Steenbokpan, b.jpg, Vachellia erioloba, habitus, Steenbokpan, c.jpg, Vachellia erioloba, loof en dorings, Steenbokpan, c.jpg. JMK (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Zwei fehlbestimmte Bilder

• 
  falsch bestimmt
• 
  falsch bestimmt
• 
  Cardamine impatiens
• 
  Cardamine flexuosa

Hallo AnRo0002/2018,
die Bilder File:20150426Cardamine impatiens1.jpg und File:20150426Cardamine impatiens2.jpg zeigen sicher nicht Cardamine impatiens, weil die Blütenblätter viel zu breit sind. Cardamine flexuosa impatiens hat nur ganz unscheinbare, sehr schmale Blütenblätter (siehe drittes Bild in der Galerie oben), die oft fehlen. Wegen der Zahl der Staubgefäße pro Blüte (in der Regel 6, wenigstens auf einem der Bilder sichtbar), halte ich das für Cardamine flexuosa. Die von der Blüte her ähnliche Art Cardamine hirsuta hat in der Regel 4 Staubgefäße pro Blüte. Zudem passt natürlich das Waldgebiet Schwetzinger Hardt (bitte mit "dt") prima zum Wald-Schaumkraut (Cardamine flexuosa), was aber nicht bedeutet, dass an Waldwegen die mehr auf offenen Boden spezialisierte, eher zivilisationsnahe Cardamine hirsuta nicht vorkommt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen und besten Wünschen für einen guten Rutsch ins Jahr 2019, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Kleine Korrektur (mit <s> tags gekennzeichnet). Ansonsten sind Roberts Erklärungen wie immer erhellend ... und eine Freude zu lesen. Danke! -- Martinus KE (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Danke für die Richtigstellung. Das Wald-Schaumkraut ist mir als solches erst drei Jahre später aufgefallen. Dafür spricht auch die Blütezeit im April. Nach meiner Beobachtung fängt das Spring-Schaumkraut erst Ende Mai an zu blühen --anro (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2018 (UTC)