Bernd Wältz
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
|
File:Ernst-Abbe-Gymnasium Sonnenallee 79.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Copyright status: File:Minna Specht.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Minna Specht.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Begleitschreiben Pauls zum Entschädigungsantrag.jpg case 2
- File:Verweigerung der Schulleitung für Heinz Paul durch die Schulaufsicht.jpg case 3
- File:Aufschrift Titelseite Schulprospekt 01.jpg case 4
- File:Karl Joachim Weintraub.jpg case 5
- File:Schulgebäude der Privaten Waldschule Kaliski in Berlin-Dahlem, Im Dol 2–6.jpg case 6
- File:Erinnerungstafel im Jüdischen Museum Berlin.jpg case 7
- File:Stundenplan aus dem Jahr 1938.jpg case 8
- File:Gedenktafel Smallbones Dowden Text deutsch.jpg case 9
- File:Gedenktafel Smallbones Dowden Text englisch.jpg case 10
- File:Schwerspatgrube Anna Grubenskizze.jpg case 11
- File:Wildsautropfen.jpg case 12
- File:Trutzhain 4.jpg case 13
- File:Trutzhain 3.jpg case 14
- File:Verseuchte 68er Plakette.jpg case 15
- File:Ich bin ein verseuchter 68er.jpg case 16
- File:ÖKO-TEST-Gründer.jpg case 17---- (talk) 17:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- File:Der legendäre Redaktionstisch.JPG case 18
Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Die Fälle 1 bis 4 beruhen auf Fotokopien in einem öffentlich zugänglichen Archiv, das ausdrücklich das Anfertigen von Fotokopien oder Fotos des Akteninhalts erlaubt.
Fall 5: Ich habe die Quelle angegeben und ausdrücklich darauf hingewiesen, dass die University of Chicago den Download dieses Bildes (und damit auch dessen Verwendung) freigegeben hat. Es gehört zu einer Pressemitteilung der UoC.
Die Fälle 6, 7 und 8 sind "Fotozitate". Ich habe Aufnahmen im Jüdischen Museum in Berlin gemacht, was nicht verboten ist, und Ausschnitte dieser Fotos hochgeladen.
Die Fälle 9 und 10 bilden im Straßenraum von Frankfurt öffentlich zugängliche und von der Stadt errichtete Gedenktafel ab.
Fall 11: hier handelt es sich um die von mir fotografierte öffentlich zugängliche Schautafel eines kommunalen Denkmals (ähnlich den Fällen 9 und 10).
Fall 12: Mir wurde ein Fläschchen Schnaps geschenkt, den ich nicht getrunken habe. Stattdessen habe ich das Etikett von der Flasche glöst und fotografiert.
Fälle 13 und 14: Analog den Fällen 6, 7 und 8.
Fall 15: Das ist ein von mir in Libre Office selbst gestalteter Button.
Fall 17 und 18: Auf dem einen Foto bin ich selber mit drauf. Ich war damals Geschäftsführer von ÖKO-Test, und diese Fotos sind von uns ohne jegliche Einschränkung an die Presse weitergegeben worden. Wir waren froh, wenn sie verwendet wurden.
Ich bin weder Jurist noch Urheberrechtsexperte, aber ich habe mir schon angewöhnt, mit Fotos in der WIKIPEDIA besonders vorsichtig umzugehen (siehe die Diskussion zu Minna Specht). In den hier diskutierten Fällen fehlt mir allerdings das Unrechtsbewußtsein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Der wilde bernd (talk • contribs) 16:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)---- (talk) 17:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)- Hier noch einmal etwas ausführlicher meine Widerrede zu den "Löschkandidaten". Vorweg: Alle beanstandeten Fotos wurden von mir selbst aufgenommen, sind damit also "mein Werk". Das Problem scheint demnach darin zu bestehen, dass das, was ich fotografiert habe Inhalte enthält, die ich nicht hätte fotografieren oder hochladen dürfen. Das scheint mir jedoch in vielen der beanstandeten Fälle absurd zu sein. Wenn ein staatliches oder kommunales Archiv ausdrücklich erlaubt, dass die Akteninhalte fotokopiert oder fotografiert werden dürfen, weshalb sind dann so entstandene Aufnahmen nicht statthaft? Warum sind Aufnahmen von im öffetnlichen Raum installierten Gedenktafeln (Panoramafreiheit) nicht zulässig? Dann müssten auch sämtliche Aufnahmen von Stolpersteinen, von denen ich auch einige hochgeladen habe, unzulässig sein. In einem anderen Fall habe ich ein Foto eingestellt, das die University von Chicago zumDownload freigegeben hat. Ich habe die Quelle und auch diesen Hinweis angegeben, aber dennoch soll das Bild gelöscht werden. Weshalb? Ich habe auch Fotos hochgeladen, die ich im Jüdischen Museum in Berlin gemacht habe. Das Fotografieren war dort erlaubt. Warum darf ich diese Bilder nicht verwenden? Der Betreiber der Webseite http://www.stmarystownandcountryschool.com/ hat mir gestern erlaubt, dass ich Bilder von der Seite mit Quellennennung in eigenen Wikipedia-Artikeln verwenden darf. Wie soll ich das tun, um nicht abermals in die Löschfalle zu geraten? Ich gestehe, dass ich mit dieser Diskussion grosse Schwierigkeiten habe. All diese Bilder waren für mich keine Selbstzwecke, sondern Elemente zur Illustration von WIKIPEDIA-Artikeln. Momentan sieht es für mich aber so aus, dass ich besser die Finger von Bildmaterial lasse und mich auf Texte beschränke. Schön finde ich das nicht, aber vielleicht können wir ja an Hand meiner "Fälle" noch zu einer gemeinsamen Regelung kommen. ---- (talk) 13:51, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Die Fälle 1 bis 4 beruhen auf Fotokopien in einem öffentlich zugänglichen Archiv, das ausdrücklich das Anfertigen von Fotokopien oder Fotos des Akteninhalts erlaubt.
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Chagall-Fenster in St. Stephan, Mainz 02.jpg
- File:Chagall-Fenster in St. Stephan, Mainz 03.jpg
- File:Chagall-Fenster in St. Stephan, Mainz 04.jpg
- File:Chagall-Fenster in St. Stephan, Mainz 05.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 21:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Fritz Neumann.jpeg
editCopyright status: File:Fritz Neumann.jpeg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Fritz Neumann.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Villa Jacobi 1935.jpeg
editCopyright status: File:Villa Jacobi 1935.jpeg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Villa Jacobi 1935.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Fritz Neumann.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Aktion Volkssarg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:KarlHerxheimer 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Vera Kohn (Mitte) als Schauspielerin an den Kammerspielen in Quito.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera Kohn (Mitte) als Schauspielerin an den Kammerspielen in Quito.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2003:C0:8F3F:B200:FD5C:B5A5:41DD:87D2.
And also:
- File:Vera Kohn aus dem Film von Eva Zelig Theater 3.jpg ( Nominator : 2003:C0:8F3F:B200:FD5C:B5A5:41DD:87D2 | Reason : This media file is missing evidence of permission. )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 08:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Karl und Hilde Löwenberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : AxelHH.
And also:
- File:Hilde Löwenberg und ihr Sohn Wolfgang.jpg ( Nominator : AxelHH | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/CANNOTFINDTHESUBPAGE )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 13:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Brückenkopf Mainz – Grenzpunkt Langen 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Internierungslager in Frankreich has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |