Berrucomons

Bienvenue

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Berrucomons!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], cela donne : Image:Foo.jpg Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : {{bad name|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}} Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

le Korrigan →bla 22:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

2007

Description page

Question: you recently changed description page I changed myself yesterday: Featured picture up front, location separated from summary, etc. I feel it is more important for users to have the image description as close as possible to the image itself... as it was done in images I did not change (see all 2006 featured images, for examples), and all the ones I did change (featured pictures from mars 2007 to present, roughtly). Do you mind if I come back to a more classical format? Berrucomons 14:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour, its just a matter of taste, i would say. The file name and the category say all, the description is just a bonus information in my eyes. --Makro Freak 14:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Linear-macro-panoramic

Am I wrong, or is Linear-macro-panoramic imaging a pompus word for scanning?

You are wrong. The images were taken withe an extreme macro lens and stitched together like a panoramic image. --Dschwen 19:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

OK. I am wrong, then. It looks a lot like good scanning though. See here for an idea of what I think.Berrucomons 19:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

:-) yep, but the per pixel resolution is about 10 microns in my pic. You'd need a pretty good scanner for that. --Dschwen 08:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Let's say I have a good scanner then: I have scanned diseased leaves and wes surprised to see the individual spores of the fungal pathogen. Those are like 50 µm long. It was the first time in my life I saw individual fongal spores without a microscope...Berrucomons 13:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I want your scanner :-) --Dschwen 14:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fringilla coelebs (chaffinch), male.jpg

I don't know if you've seen that there's now a version 3 of this image up for voting. See Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fringilla coelebs (chaffinch), male.jpg--MichaelMaggs 14:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:The Photographer.jpg‎

Please join the discussion here - Alvesgaspar 09:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

English version?

Hellow. I do it, but my english is too bad. See Image:Felicidade A very happy boy.jpg. Greetings--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 16:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Although I have a problem understanding the caption: did the parc dissapear? It was destroyed or something like that? Berrucomons 16:56, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

It wasn't destroyed. The park it was provisional and it was reconstructed in a next place. Greetings--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 16:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, if I understand well, it was more like a playing ground or something like that... Berrucomons 19:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Rose chaffers

Thank you for your interest in my Rose-chaffers. As you guessed i breed them, and sometimes when its raining and boring i put them out and do some pictures. Next week i want to buy some more larvaes. Regards --Makro Freak ^talk 20:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Aiguile Chichilianne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Complete neuron cell diagram.svg

Salut ! Juste un mot rapide pour signaler ce qui me semble est une erreur de frappe sur l'image donnée en titre : sauf langage spécifique que je ne connait pas, le mot noyeau n'existe pas en français, on dit noyau. Cordialement, --Stanlekub 16:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

C'est réglé. Merci pour l'info! Berrucomons 12:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Tu va dire que je suis casse-bonbons, mais en fait il en reste un (en bas à droite, dans le cercle). Désolé ;) --Stanlekub 16:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Ca arrive... :-) Berrucomons 19:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

C'est fait! Berrucomons 08:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vue en montant à Vallonpierre.jpg

Hi! Can you find a category for your photo Image:Vue en montant à Vallonpierre.jpg? (Mountain, Alps or settlement) Thank you very much --Beyond silence 13:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Yep, it's comming! Berrucomons 15:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Salut, je l'ai nominée pour les FP, je la trouve superbe cette photo !!! Benh 17:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Merci!

Image:Lauzon.JPG

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Oxam Hartog 00:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

That's fixed! Berrucomons 09:48, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue en montant à Vallonpierre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Thank you for the translation

Hi Berrucomons. Thank you for translation to French of the image page for this Nunâ island FP of mine. I have never had a French description before, and I think it's kindda cool. Sorry the description was sooo long ;-) -- Slaunger 20:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem! I am systematically translating FP captions in French Berrucomons 14:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

And this! -- Slaunger 20:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauzon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Diversité_taille_tomates.jpg

Ce média risque d'être supprimé.

Merci d'avoir téléchargé Image:Diversité_taille_tomates.jpg. Je remarque que la page « image » n'indique pas à l'heure actuelle qui a créé le contenu, donc son statut eu égard aux droits d'auteurs n'est pas clair. Si vous n'avez pas créé ce contenu vous-même, vous devez indiquer les arguments qui expliquent pourquoi l'utilisation sur Wikimedia Commons est licite (voir ci-dessous). Si vous n'avez pas créé le média vous-même, vous devez aussi spécifier où vous l'avez trouvé, par exemple il s'agira bien souvent du site internet d'où vous l'avez prélevé, et les conditions d'utilisation qui sont indiquées sur ce site.

Si le média n'a pas non plus de message indiquant sa licence, vous devez en ajouter un. Si vous avez vous-même pris la photo, enregistré le contenu sonore, le contenu vidéo, vous pouvez utiliser {{GFDL-self}} pour le distribuer sous licence GFDL. Voyez Commons:Bandeaux de licence pour consulter la liste complète des messages de statut juridique que vous pouvez utiliser.

Veuillez noter que tout contenu non sourcé et non accompagné de message de statut juridique sera supprimé une semaine après leur téléchargement, comme indiqué dans le Guide de suppression. Si vous avez téléchargé d'autres médias, veuillez vérifier que vous avez pour chacun d'eux spécifié la source et le statut juridique. Vous pouvez retrouver tous vos téléchargements en utilisant cet outil. Merci. Matt314 08:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Pas de panique: C'est une création personelle, je m'occupe de la licence de suite.Berrucomons 16:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:2909 vallon moy res.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:2909 vallon moy res.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 22:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Translations

Hi, thanks a lot for your translations! :) -- aka 20:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Berrucomons 20:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

featured picture

Thanks for congratulations :)

Unfortunately, I don't have anything in common with pianos (excepting this few pictures), nor with music vocabulary so I can't translate descriptions :( I've only drawed this pictures - working in cooperation with piano tuner Bechstein from pl-wiki (he probably isn't registered on commons) responsible for making descriptions... only in Polish :(

I've seen that User:Dbolton translated the description to english in my first piano scheme. Maybe he would help? Regards, Orem 15:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice! Berru 20:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:2909 vallon moy res.jpg

I was trying to see if the strange corona was a chromatic aberration, but when I proceeded, I found this irregularity (RGB separation): . Could this be fixed? _→AzaToth 14:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Good question! I'll check if these are in the original photos. Stiching was done "manually" using Photoshop. I don't think I moved each color separately. If you are interrestad in fixing or analysing this picture, you should perhap rather look at this one, from witch vallon moy res was downsampled. Although I think it is a very nice picture, I do not think it is technically perfect. There definitively is CA and stiching errors. See also the nomination page. Berru 16:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

If the original photos where available, I could see if I could do a restich, it's strange that one color is so off, but not uniformly. _→AzaToth 18:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

And, yea, it's present in the original, larger picture, it's the red channel that has been distorted. _→AzaToth 18:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

So sorry, I whent through those pictures, and apparently I don't have the original pictures I made this pano from anymore... Berru 15:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, do you think we can get rid of this image or is it still needed? I mean, I have nothing against it, but I don't quite see the point in keeping it. If you don't need it anymore, please let me know or nominate it for deletion yourself. Thanks a lot, --Japs 88 (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't know what picture you are speaking about. 2909 vallon moy res.jpg is a featured picture, I do not think at all that it has to be deleted. 2909 vallon moy res-chromatic stitch error.gif was made by AzaToth. I don't think it is very important anymore, but I am not the author of this derived work. Perhaps you should ask him...--Berru (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

2008

:Image:Campo de Criptana Molinos de Viento 1.jpg

Ya está traducido. Saludos Lourdes 15:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much!

I added some links.

Berru 15:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Salut, en français comme en anglais les noms anatomiques suivent une nomenclature où le cubitus s'appelle l'ulna, et le péronné fibula, l'omoplate c'est scapula...etc. Bonne soirée. --90.7.225.194 18:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

POTY Competition

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that become a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Moulin de la batie.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

That was fast! let us say, 10 seconds or so... I added a lisence...--Berru 21:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Piron.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plan de Baix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3086 pensee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Thanks

for doing things like this. Much appreciated! -- Slaunger 20:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Many Thanks! Translation is almost a hobby for me. It helps me keep my English fresh... And it is a pretext for browsing nice pictures!

Merci beaucoup!

Hi Berrucomons! Thanks a lot for translating my image captions into French. Your work has inspired me to start translating into French or Esperanto, whenever I can :-) Cheers, bdesham ★ 23:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. And congratulations! It's an excellent thing you start translating image captions. Most of captions in here are in only one langage. Generaly English,sometimes french, german, polish or japanese. It is bad, because it divides this huge image database in smaller, less general ones.--Berru 20:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Rosetta Barnstar

I hereby award you this Rosetta Barnstar for your numerous and tireless translations of image page descriptions to French. -- Slaunger 21:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very, very much! it will go strait on the top of my page. --Berru 21:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Good word !

Merci bien pour ton travail de traduction et information avec mes images. You have certainly deserved that barnstar! Salut -- Alvesgaspar 21:42, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Waouh! it falls from everywere tonight! That's always welcome for sure!--Berru 21:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Elia complex

Hi, Elia Complex is a building with residential apartments and offices. It is one of Tanzania's most expensive "for lease" building. Thanks for the translation.Muhammad Mahdi Karim 06:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome!--Berru 14:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

One more about translations....

I was looking to see who was helping with QI and noticed that not only do you do all of the things for sorting the images and notifying people you are also translating them. This is an additional step in the process that hurts my head some when I try to project that onto the few weeks I was managing the QI stuff.
Exceptional! The good kind.... -- carol 22:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand everything... Seems quite positive so thank you anyway! I generally don't sort QI but I just translate their captions. Sometimes, I add links or geographical precisions. I only notify people when I have problems translating their picture captions. It is quite gratifying to receive all the praises I receive these days. Thank you very, very much to all of you guys!--Berru 19:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

RE:French captions

Thank-you for fixing the french captions on my photos. I have no understanding of the french of the french language and used Altavista's Babelfish for all my translations. However, I will try to add your suggestions to my captions. Thanks again. --Digon3 ^talk 19:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. --Berru 19:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Merci!

Thanks for the translation on Image:Solander Island.jpg. I had 4 years of French immersion but still can't string together a proper caption! (or at least am not confident enough in my grammar) --Padraic 19:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

You are welcome ! I find important to translate captions. I can't do everything, so I browse quality images --Berru 19:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Graffiti on Maro stern.jpg

Hi Berru,

Hmm, quite a tough translation :-) "Kaxero" is the Spanish word "casero" in a basque style. Casero in turn means home-made, home-loving or rural depending on the context. In this case, I'd say that it's the nickname of the painter or something like that, used as "rural" or "from the country-house". - Keta 17:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, thank you! --Berru 19:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Bicyclettes

Il semble que tu aies fait une confusion. Ta dernière version de Image:Bicycle_evolution-fr.svg correspond à une variante de Image:Bicycle diagram2-fr.svg qui est venue écraser, la version précédente de Bicycle_evolution-fr.svg qui était tout-à-fait correcte. Je suggère de restaurer cette précédente version et de déplacer ce diagramme sur Bicycle diagram2-fr.svg et de déplacer Image:Bicycle diagram2-fr.svg sur Image:Bicycle diagram-fr.svg parce que il s'agit de la version française de la série Bicycle diagram-xx.svg. Suis-je clair ? Arno Lagrange ✉ 20:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Ha ! je viens de voir que Image:Bycicle_diagram-fr.svg existe. C'est lui qui devrait être nommé Image:Bicycle diagram-fr.svg le i et le y ont été permutés ! Arno Lagrange ✉ 20:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

euh... en fait, je suis perdu la... Quand j'ai fait cette traduction, ça avait l'air OK sauf le lien sur ma page. Et maintenant, en effet, je n'ai plus le bon svg! il n'est même plus dans l'historique! c'est très zarb tout ça... Je crois encore avoir le fichier quelque part (ça commence à dater...)--Berru 12:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

c'est réglé!--Berru 06:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the translations

Hi Berrucomons. Thank you very much for the translations to French of my FPs. --LucaG 06:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome!--Berru 19:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Sympa les traductions !

Merci pour les traductions. Une petite remarque concernant Image:Parement de lauze Lannion Bretagne.JPG : si je comprends bien, slate signifie "ardoise", or justement la lauze n'est pas de l'ardoise (sauf erreur). Existe-t-il un terme anglais plus précis ? Cordialement, DocteurCosmos 07:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Merci pour le compliment! Je ne crois pas qu'il y ait de traduction exacte pour "Lauze". Peut-être que "Flagstone" est plus proche, mais il décrit un grès... Apparement, les "Lauzes" de Lannion sont en schiste comme des ardoises... dans l'article "Slate" on voit un toit de "slates" qui sont d'épaisseur comparables aux "lauzes" de Lannion. Enfin, les ardoisieres de trelaze vendent des "lauzes ou ardoises de montagne"

Tu t'y connais donc mieux que moi ! ça m'apprendra à pinailler... ;-) DocteurCosmos 08:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Non,non, c'est très bien de pinailler! ;-) --Berru 19:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Serait-ce trop te demander de traduire la légende de cette photo que je viens d'uploader ? DocteurCosmos 12:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

C'est fait! --Berru 21:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

So nice ! Merci. DocteurCosmos 16:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Request to translate Valued image project launch announcement

Hi Berrucomons, I do not know if you have heard of the Valued images project? It is a new project, which will be launched on June 1, 2008 at 0:00 UTC. To give it a good boost we would like to announce the launch on various important WMF project pages. This includes the French Wikipedia. I was wondering if you would be so kind to translate the announcement to French? -- Slaunger 19:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

That's done!--Berru 20:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Twarożnik/Tvarožník

hello. Twarożnik/Tvarožník this is name of rock. Twarożnik this is name in Polish language, Tvarožník - in Czech language. regards - Pudelek 11:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! --Berru 19:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Request to announce Valued images on the French Wikipedia

Hi Berrucomons, You were kind enough to translate this announcement to French. I was wondering if you could do the project another small favour? It is about time to publish the announcement on relevant sister project pages, and I was wondering if you could post the announcement on the French Wikipedia on one or more relevant pages, like the village pump, and the graphics lab perhaps (You probably know better than I how fr.wikipedia.org is organized)? If you do not have an account on the French Wikipedia or do not have the time to do it, could you perhaps direct me to another fr user who could do it. Once done, please update the thread Commons talk:Valued image candidates#Announcing VI on sister projects. As a matter of act you may want to have a look there to make sure another user has not done it already! Happy editing, -- Slaunger 20:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I saw you added it to "Bistro". Did you add it to the graphics lab as well? -- Slaunger 21:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis pururea close up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot, but maybe try portrait layout next time. Lycaon 21:31, 31 May 2008 (UTC). The portrait shot is blurred. Sorry. --Berrucomons 20:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Pesteil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Camera has a slight CA problem and the perspective should be corrected in this shot (as it is only slightly off). Did support then. --Dschwen 16:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)  Done Berrucomons 19:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC) In my opinion it's ok for QI --Berthold Werner 19:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

2009

Re: Feral?

Yes, it is feral. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! --Berru (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you / Merci

I hereby award you this Translation Barnstar for incessant translations of image page descriptions to French. It is much appreciated. Lycaon (talk) 22:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Martin Luther King monument

Hello, nice translation work! You might want to translate this addition too. Cheers! Plrk (talk) 23:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Done.--Berru (talk) 20:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heterostyly.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info To my knowlege, this is the best representation of heterostyly in commons. Pin and Thrum flowers are seen on better images, but they are not dissected, i.e. one cannot see both the stamen and pistil. Heterostyly is common across several plant families. I can remove the numbers and letters if needed. --Berru (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I guess better illustrations of this phenomenon are possible, but they are not on commons at the moment. This image sufficiently shows heterostyly IMO, and until something better comes up, it gets my support vote. Geolocation is not applicable here and the other criteria are met. And, BTW, the numbers are handy to compare structures, so better leave them as they are. I also added another category (category:pollination). Lycaon (talk) 10:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chateau de Pesteil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info To my knowlege, this is the best picture of this castle in Commons.--Berru (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Please geolocate (it is required!). Lycaon (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

 Info Done. I thought geographical information was enough (i.e. you can go there with the info I gave). --Berru (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. Geolocation (with coordinates) is one of the six evaluation citeria. All fine now. Lycaon (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 07:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stereum insignitum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info As previously, this image is not technically perfect, but it is to my knowlege the best we have for this species. QI status was rejected on a basis of shallow DOF.--Berru (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment First and for all, the image needs to be geocoded. Secondly, on Species fungorum, this species is said to be a synonym of Stereum subtomentosum Pouzar, 1964 (Yellow Curtain Crust). Lycaon (talk) 14:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

 Info Geolocalization: Inefficiently done. Done nevertheless. Species: Stereum subtomentosum and stereum insignitum sensu Carleton Rea (1922) are synonymus. stereum insignitum sensu Quelet (1889) is not. Admitedly, fungal taxonomy is messy. At least we are not talking russulales here. --Berru (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Support OK, issues resolved. I took the liberty to do a bit of 'recatting' of the Stereums. Lycaon (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 20:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise brouage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. Meets the criteria --High Contrast 11:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Assessment templates on translations

Hi, please don't put templates like {{Picture of the day}} or {{Assessments}} on versions of a file that were not actually a POTD or FP. Thanks! Rocket000 (talk) 23:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

I did that? --Berru (talk) 18:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

You did do this for one image, but I think I may have confused you with another user that was doing it for multiple images. Rocket000 (talk) 18:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, that was me. Sorry. I copied the caption of the original image, a FP SVG with english text embedded, and I did not realize it contained these banners that did not apply to the translated image. I did this kind of thing for other SVGs (see my gallery) I will check and remove those banners.--Berru (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Not a big deal. :) Cheers, Rocket000 (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Le cavalier de Bamberg

Bonjour, there is an own article of this statue in the english Wikipedia: en:Bamberg Horseman. I think you can get all information you need there. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Jules Massenet - Le Cid 2e Acte, 3e Tableau - L'Illustration.jpg

Sorry, I hate to be a pain, but does the French version say the première date is 5 Décembre 1885? The première was actually on November 30th, but engravings take a while to make, so Victorian newspapers were generally about a week behind the events they cover. The Englih version could probably stand to be a little clearer.

This doesn't mean I don't appreciate your translation work: I've seen you do it on a lot of my images, and have always been glad that they were getting introduced to more people in more cultures =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Excellent work

Hi Berru, I just wanted to come and mention my appreciation for all of the French descriptions you are adding to images, :-) I'm interested in keeping Commons very much international and multi-lingual, but lack the skills to help in this regard myself! It's very encouraging to see your dedication to translation. Thank you! Maedin\^talk 16:27, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

22.05.09

Cher Monsieur Berru,

Je vous prie de m’excuser pour deux faits. Le premier est que j’ai vu votre message avec beaucoup de retard ; le deuxième est du à mes habitudes du peuple roumain (car je suis roumain) et pour cela je ne suis pas habitué de dire, au commencement d’une lettre, « Bonjour ! » comme les français.

Puis, je dois vous remercier pour vos belles appréciations sur mon article Sarcophagidae. Mais, je dois vous partager qu’il m’est très lourd d’écrire pour wikipedia, parce que je ne peux comprendre certaines politiques de cette encyclopédie et, surtout, je ne supporte pas les incitations intempestives qui détournent les bonnes initiatives des hommes de culture ou de science, ainsi que les provocations pour les discutions sans lien avec le sujet ou les étiquettes sans raison qui sont collées avant la fin de l’article, les langages pas bien contrôlés de certains admins. etc.

Et, pour vous répondre à votre dernier message, je dois vous dire que j’ai copié la photo sur mon photoshop et j’ai fait quelques manœuvres pour voir mieux certaines caractères qui pourrait préciser l’appartenance de la mouche. Malheureusement, j’ai vu qu’elle n’est pas une Sarcophaga, parce que - probablement - les macrochètes sternopleuraux sont dans la position 1 :1 et on ne voit pas des taches en damier sur l’abdomen et les poiles de l’ariste. Plus probablement qu’elle est un Tachinaire. Mais, en tout cas, il est impossible de faire une identification exacte sur une photo qui ne montre pas au moins les caractères de la famille. Aujourd’hui toute identification se fait d’après l’examen des génitalies mâles et pour cela, je regrette que je ne puisse vous être plus utile. Anlirian, 22.05.09

Bonjour Anlirian,

Dire bonjour au début d'une lettre est d'usage pour les courriers électroniques, e-mail, et communication sur internet. Pour le courrier sur papier, on emploie plus couramment des formules du type « Cher monsieur, etc. ». Cet usage vient du caractère instantané de l'échange, qui du coup peut prendre l'aspect d'une conversation.

Merci beaucoup pour votre précision sur cette photo, je vais la corriger en fonction. Vous n'avez pas à vous excuser d'une détermination incomplète, elle sera toujours préférable à une détermination fausse... Il existe beaucoup de photos sur Wikimedia Commons de mouches à viande de qualité comparable à celle ci, mais où la determination n'est peut être pas non plus très bonne. N'étant pas entomologiste moi même, je me permet de vous demander encore un précision: Par Tachinaire, entendez-vous le genre "tachina" ou la famille des tachinidae ?

Berru

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Berrucomons!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Human skeleton back french.svg is uncategorized since 3 June 2009.
• Image:Chevet Fontevraud.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Respiratory system complete fr.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:LMFBR schematics2 fr.svg was uncategorized on 15 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
• Image:4140 Pano Menez-Hom noms.png was uncategorized on 13 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:4138 Pano Menez-Hom 2.jpg was uncategorized on 13 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac du Roburent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good... with some acceptable CA (blue green fringe) on the horizon at left). --Cayambe 14:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallon orrenaye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)  Support clouds tiny overexposured, but overall excellent --George Chernilevsky 21:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauzanier lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Excellent image, except for the tilt (and some minor CA) -- H005 23:12, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Done! --Berrucomons 19:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the effort, a significant improvement, but it has to be rotated even a bit further. On the lake surface, any two points that have the same distance from the camera should be horizontal. -- H005 22:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Done! --Berrucomons 18:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC) Excellent, great view.! -- H005 23:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallée ubayette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Image:Brombeerlaub.jpg

Hi! The exactly scientific name is rubus caesius. --je-str (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank You! --Berru (talk) 14:12, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Larche (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose - Not Geocoded --Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Oops! It is geocoded, now.--Berru (talk) 21:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support It's a tiny village (75 inhabitants in 2006) but it seems that VI rules don't prevent from nominating an image for such a scope. They only say: "Examples of suitable scopes: [...] A location of more than local interest". There is an article in :fr:Wikipedia but also in several Wikipedias in other languages (it's the same for almost all 36 000 communes of France...). Moreover, some previous promoted VIC were about small villages, see Commons:Valued images by topic#Cities and towns. Assuming that the scope is OK, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Confluence Ubaye Ubayette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 20:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC))

2010

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cachamay Falls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I took the liberty of linking the scope with the newly created category. The nominated image is geocoded and well documented; it shows the falls as they are nowadays => good for VI IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Village Gran Roque

Bonjour Berru, A ce sujet, une petite discussion a été commencée sur ma PDD :-) --Myrabella (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Désolé d’avoir mis la panique dans ton image de Village Gran Roque mais les scopes sont un peu déroutants. Par contre superbe image de tocaco: je vais rester dans les sciences naturelles plutôt que dans les paysages où je ne suis pas très compétant --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Pas de problème. Pour te donner une idée, je ne savais pas qui avait le droit / pas le droit de changer le scope... --Berru (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Llovizna falls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good synoptic view of the falls, best in scope and all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 05:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mourera fluviatilis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All six criteria satisfied, in my opinion. Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 05:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mourera fluviatilis flowers fruits.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and Useful -- Archaeodontosaurus 07:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tococa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Only picture is in scope, but it is particularly teaching and very good quality. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhyncholacis penicillata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Nice picture, but please add a scope to the review page and a geocode to the image page. I guess the scope should be Rhyncholacis penicillata or something like that, isn't it? -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 19:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• Geolocation done. Scope done. Sorry for the delay. --Berru (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I think it is a good illustration of this type of plant, even with the turbulent water surface that does not allow a clear view to the underwater parts, but at least they are visible. Criteria 1, 2 and 3 are OK for me, also 4, 5 and 6. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 20:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7005 poussins 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice juvenile owls --George Chernilevsky 18:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cocoi .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-pêcheur à ventre roux.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharpness on the Kingfisher and good ev --Herbythyme 08:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment Agree with Herbythyme... but the lens spot between the two poles should be removed :-). --Cayambe 14:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salto Angel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please add a scope! There is one image that may be a good competitor: File:Salto angel.jpg. Haven't reviewed it yet. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 19:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
• That was a typo. Sorry. File:Salto angel.jpg is a good competitor, although it has a lower resolution and does not show the surrouding landscape in my opinion. It is up to you to decide.--Berru (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support It does meet criteria 3 to 6 very good. Since there are quite some other nice shots of the Salto Angle available I am not absolutely sure about crit. 1 and 2. Especially other pictures showing the fall with more discarge may illustrate the subject of a fall slightly better. But due to the stunning perspective and the high quality of the photography I decided to support this one. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 20:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 11:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks :)

For your translations - regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC) You are welcome! --Berru (talk) 16:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ciudad Guayana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I intend to review it, but I need some more time to understand the history and mix of both cities (Ciudad Guayana and Puerto Ordaz) so I post this comment mostly to keep this nomination open for some few days more :-) --Myrabella (talk) 16:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The image shows only Puerto Ordaz, but this former city constitutes the modern planned part of the new town of Ciudad Guayana, which is known for this feature—and for the the criticism levelled against that (one can read in en:Ciudad Guayana: "Much critique has been made about its design, which was created by a number of planners from MIT and Harvard in the early 1960s."). In this very special case, the redundant categorization can be accepted. This partial view can be labelled as the best global view available in Commons, and the most illustrative image of Ciudad Guayana at present, IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 12:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

For your thanslations. --JMSchneid (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome! --Berru (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

+1 - thanks! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

I still appreciate your translations

Bonsoir Berru,

I have previously given you a barnstar for doing translations to French. I just wanted to tell you that I still very much appreciate it every time you pop up in my watchlist with a new French translation. I am taking an introductory course in Frenchm and reading your translations of my photos descriptions are very helpful for training purposes (although I am not at all capable of translating them myself). Once again thanks for the huge translation work you are doing and have done here! --Slaunger (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! This kind of support helps me to continue.--Berru (talk) 19:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Berru, I just noticed the translation in File:Geotrygon montana Parc des Mamelles Guadeloupe 2010-04-04.jpg. When I read the French translation I get the impression that it says the photo is taken in the National park of Guadeloupe. Well, this is sort of correct, but... I do not know if it is clear from the context, but it is strictly speaking a zoo shot of a bird in captivity in the zoo Parc de Mamelles, which is embedded in/right at the edge of the national park. From the current description I get the impression that it is a wildlife shot(?), which it is not. But maybe I just misunderstand. Best wishes, --Slaunger (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

You are right. I misunderstood your caption. I'll change both french and english translations, since in both langages "park" is misleading : it can be a protected natual area or a zoo... --Berru (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I wish to echo Slaunger's praise above. Merci beaucoup, --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Berru (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Qasr Al-Azraq.jpg

Hello Berrucomons!

Thanks for adding the french description to this file! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 19:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome!

I translate any caption as long as it is usefull, if people ask, or if the picture is FP or VI. So, if you want other translations, just ask!

--Berru (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Wrong desc

File:Gorki-lenin-room-01.jpg -- wrong Français title, he was not arrested here, but just visited his friend's homestead for a couple of days and slept in this hunting lodge. Please fix.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello Pereslav, and thank you for your interrest. I appreciate your remark, but there is no need to fix this: "Lénine s'est arrêté ici" means "Lenin made a halt here". If Lenin had be arrested, it would read "Lénine s'est fait arrêter". I can assure you that this translation is not misleading at all for French readers. I also translated the additional detail you added.--Berru (talk) 17:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. The reason was that automatic translation by Google showed this description like "The bedroom of a hunting lodge or Lenin has arrested two days in 1894". Also, not 2 days but a couple of days; maybe two, maybe three, maybe five, I just do not remember :-).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:20, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Description for Buchenwald Slave Laborers Liberation

I noticed you changed the description for File:Buchenwald_Slave_Laborers_Liberation.jpg from "slave labourers" to "Jewish slave labourers" on 1st May 2009. As many other groups were present (Gypsies, homosexuals, PoWs, etc) I was wondering where you got this informatiuon from? The description at the Nation Archives simply says "slave labourers". Thanks. 87.113.0.82 01:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I merged the existing description with another description from a duplicate image uploaded to en:, by en:User:Zoe, en:User:Ellywa and en:User:Gabbe. It did read <<Jewish slave laborers at Buchenwald. The very ill man lying at the back on the lower coughes is nl:Max Hamburger, who came with TBC and malnourished from the camp. He recovered and became a psychiatrist in the Netherlands. Second row, seventh from left is Elie Wiesel.>>. I did not verify this information myself. Sorry.--Berru (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1066 pano vue belvédère d'arpison.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 16:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

2011

Fleche Font Robert 231.4 (2).jpg

Bonjour, Tu as enlevé en partie le Langswich pour cette image. Y-a-t-il un problème avec le langswich? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:52, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

J'ai deux problèmes avec Langswich :

1. Cette fonction n'est pas utilisée couramment dans les autres descriptions d'image de valeur

2. Je suis enregistré comme utilisateur français, et je ne vois apparaitre que les descriptions en anglais. Losque l'on utilise les templates linguistiques "classiques", l'utilisateur à la possibilité de ne voir des desciptions que dans sa langue. Et ça marche. Et s'il vaut changer de langue, ou toutes les voir, c'est possible d'un coup de clic.

De façon plus générale, les descriptions de ces spécimens préhistoriques (ils viennent du Muséum de Toulouse ?) utilisent très lourdement des templates, ce qui n'est pas mauvais en soi, mais rend les modifications ajouts postérieurs plus difficiles, et plus sujets aux bugs (d'ailleurs cette description là buggait, dans mon souvenir).

Cordialement,

Berru (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Je te remercie de ton intervention et de tes explications. Je vais au fur et à mesure enlever les langswich et je limiterai l’usage des templates (qui ne sont pas de mon fait) pour les images du projet Phoebus. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Et maintenant, que vais-je faire?

CONTINUE! Ne crois pas que ton travail passe inaperçu bien au contraire. Et a titre personnel Merci. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Merci! Je fais des poses pendant les vacances, mais je suis pas près d'arrêter. --Berru (talk) 19:42, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stratocumulus lacunosus clouds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it seems useful to make a category for this type of cloud --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean the lacunosus variety, or the stratocumulus lacunosus clouds?--Berru (talk) 20:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The category: Stratocumulus lacunosus. To show that there are groups, types and subtypes, in short a hierarchy in the clouds. I realized that there is a category lacunosa but is not specific in itself. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Done.--Berru (talk) 11:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC) I made the following actergories, with (I hope) cognate sub-categorization : Altocumulus lacunosus clouds, Stratocumulus lacunosus clouds and Lacunosus cloud varieties. There should be a Cirrocumulus lacunosus cloud category for completedness, but at this point it would be empty.

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Gut Marienhof Haupthaus DRI edit.jpg

 Done via [1]. Let me know if you need anything else. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

File:5964 Lettre abri cap blanc.JPG

File:5964 Lettre abri cap blanc.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.65.49.135 07:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

File:5964 Lettre abri cap blanc.JPG

Bonjour,

J'ai restaurée ce fichier, et complété/corrigé la description. Il serait utile de mentionner où vous avez pris la photo, et la date de décès de l'auteur. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour, je suis tombé sur cette image; pourrais tu mettre un S à TRIEVE ? A+....--Biboc (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC)