Open main menu

Dies ist das Archiv zu User talk:CennoxX

Contents

File tagging File:Rooking Blue.PNGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rooking Blue.PNG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rooking Blue.PNG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Think this was an issue with a logo and threshold of originality, but not sure--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Dean_Norris.pngEdit

 
File:Dean_Norris.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 19:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Was a picture under cc, but a fotographed screen (copyright of the camera operator), of a PaleyFest panel.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Dean Norris Hank.pngEdit

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Dean Norris Hank.png. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | français | hrvatski | italiano | magyar | македонски | 日本語 | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | suomi | svenska | ไทย | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tm (talk) 00:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

The source was a picture under cc, but think this image was a poster in the background of this cc-picture.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Detroit-1-8-7 Logo.svgEdit

 
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. Fair use laws vary from country to country, and uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

Also, fair use is only applicable in a few limited contexts. The use of a media file in one context may be considered fair use, while the use of the same file in another context may constitute copyright violation. In particular, fair use does not extend to the collection and distribution of media files in a media database such as Commons. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally to projects which allow this.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português do Brasil | русский | svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Stryn (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Thought it wouldn't reach threshold of originality, but it's not like the threshold of originality in the German law.--CennoxX (talk)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, CennoxX!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

done.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gleiter von Ulm.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gleiter von Ulm.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 14:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Ya, was from the net, anywhere. But so or so it was a scan, so there was no copyrightholder.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Rookie_Blue_cropped.jpgEdit

 
File:Rookie_Blue_cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 03:49, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Canada hasn't freedom of panorama for 2D-Object. This was a cc-picture of a detail of a building with a poster.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Rookie_Blue_cropped.jpgEdit

 
File:Rookie_Blue_cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Another zoom-in of that picture.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Rookie_Blue.jpgEdit

 
File:Rookie_Blue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

The original version of the image.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Mark Johnson.pngEdit

 
File:Mark Johnson.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Karppinen (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Other cc-pictures of filmed screens.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Vince Galligan.jpgEdit

 
File:Vince Galligan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Karppinen (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Other filmed screens.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Times Square Mural.jpgEdit

 
File:Times Square Mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 10:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Another freedom of panorama-thing.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token 642c2999f8d6a7c82bead7b61185f6cbEdit

I am owner of a TUSC account.

File:Satellite Award.pngEdit

 
File:Satellite Award.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

CAWylie (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

derivate of a unfree picture.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:OGame Logo.PNGEdit

 
File:OGame Logo.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Another threshold of originality-issue.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50 and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. -- Rillke(q?) 21:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

thanks.--CennoxX (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!Edit

Hi CennoxX,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | മലയാളം | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

Mono 16:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear ReviewerEdit

 
If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi CennoxX, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 18:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Error in template corrected File:Naica 08.jpgEdit

Hi, some days ago you put an advice in File:Naica 08.jpg. The author and source was there in the params but the template was broken (the author is newbie in Commons). I've corrected it. Look. An please, before to put an advice that can bring a file to delete, look first if there is any problem with the "Information" template. This illustration is part of a wikibook. Greetings. --Dvdgmz (talk) 09:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, next time i'll check the template.--CennoxX (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. --Dvdgmz (talk) 20:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


Rainbow Bridge dingsEdit

Moin! Wo gehobelt wird, da fallen Bilder. Null Problemo   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:NCIS television prop (19 September 2008) 23.jpgEdit

Hi there. Thanks for the notification. I disagree with your assessment that this is an obvious case, so I converted your request to a normal deletion request which you can find here. Regards SoWhy 16:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification about the deletion request. I made a Deletion Request for another very similar case (Commons:Deletion requests/File:NCIS television prop (19 September 2008) 9.jpg), there weren't any concerns, so this time I made a speedydeletion. Regards.--CennoxX (talk) 17:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
That there are no concerns is not the issue. There is only a limited set of criteria for speedy deletion of images, and things that do not meet the criteria must progress via a normal process. If there is doubt about which way to go, we err on the side of deletion request, not speedy.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll do that, from now on.--CennoxX (talk) 23:00, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Reverted editsEdit

I have undone your edits at File:Holland Roden, Comic-con.jpg. There clearly should be an evidence base to a rename, and for making description changes. Please discuss your concerns with the uploader of the file prior to requesting a change on this image.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Please take a look at the source of the picture/Flickr. At Flickr the picture is tagged with "Paley Center" and part of the Flickr-set "OnStage @ Paley: MTV's Teen Wolf". Paley Center/PaleyFest is not the same like Comic-Con. I don't see any reason, why there should stand "Comic-Con" either in the description nor in the file-name. The uploader gave the picture an incorrect description, that's all. So what I should discuss with the uploader!?--CennoxX (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
I am not saying that I will not do a rename, I am just saying that there needs to be an evidence-base to support a rename in cases like this. Otherwise we have a case of "he said vs. he said". So generally I ask for that and part of that can be the courtesy of a discussion with the uploader, as you would probably like if someone request a rename of one of your uploads. In this situation where you have what you see as a strong evidence base, then add that detail to the talk page of the image, and then reference the talk page in the rename request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:03, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
If anyone changes a description, you could at least check the source of the image, before you revert a edit. Never heard of the wiki-principle "Assume good faith"?--CennoxX (talk) 20:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Mate, assume good faith is a practice that I do and very widely, and communicating openly and honestly is another.

You are requesting the rename of an image uploaded by someone else, and it is reasonable that you clearly provide the evidence and the discussion that goes with it. Where an image is used at the Wikipedias, it needs to be supported by a citable source. So if someone is to use and quote the image, the evidence-base needs to be there, not based on someone's opinion. Good practice says document a significant change and provide evidence, and that is all that I am asking of you. This is more than an examination of a file history.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, for me, being so harsh. I'll pay heed to this. And thanks for renaming.--CennoxX (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camel_Safari.jpgEdit

Kindly Check http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camel_Safari.jpg whether i am violating any laws here. If yes please let me know I will clarify and rectify it. Benedictdilton (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

  Done See my talk page, don't aks too many ppl. :-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

reply of your questionEdit

I have replied your question. see my talk page. --Puramyun31 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.--CennoxX (talk) 17:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Peter York photoEdit

I have sent permission from Burcerius college in pdf form via email for the photo of Peter York Solmssen, If I did not mark the copywrite correctly please amend the photo tags with the proper tags. thanks,RebeccaHS (talk) 22:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

That's nice. The support-team will take care of that.--CennoxX (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Uploading images with watermarksEdit

About this. See his other contributions, especially some watermarks in them. Thanks.--Fixertool (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Many pictures from this user are from the historical collection of Marie Stravlo, so maybe he has a permission for those pictures. I marked them, that they need permission. I nominated the other pictures, that seem to be copy vios, for speedy deletion.--CennoxX (talk) 21:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Image de Frédéric SouterelleEdit

I speak french ?

Je proteste, l'image n'est pas une violation de droit car le photographe lui-même a donné son accord et donc son autorisation à la publication de la photo sous condition qu'il soit cité dans la légende et ce qui était fait.

C'est d'ailleurs le comédien français lui-même qui m'a envoyé la photo pour que je l'inscrive sur le wiki en m'expliquant ce que je viens de vous dire ci-dessus.

or else (I speak little English)

I protest, the image is not a violation of law as the photographer himself agreed and therefore permission to publish the photo as long as it is mentioned in the legend, and this is what was done.

This is also the French actor himself who sent me the photo for me to enroll on the wiki explaining what I just said above. --Skarock (talk) 09:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer here and sorry for the problems. The Image was published online before, so I thought it was copied from that source. If the photographer agreed to publish this photo, it can be restored. I will take care of that.--CennoxX (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Regarding File:Sin-Duda-Book-Cover.jpgEdit

Dear User CennoxX: We send an e-mail to permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org with the authorization to publish the cover in low resolution in Wikipedia. HERE IS THE COPY: info@gatbik.com

3:05 PM (0 minutes ago)

to permissions-co. To: permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the work.

File:Sin-Duda-Book-Cover.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sin-Duda-Book-Cover.jpg


I agree to publish that work under the free license CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution v1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

10/06/2013, Miami, Florida, United States of America (USA)

Regards, Antonio Asfura Writer and author of the book "Sin Duda: La Canción y La Novela"


Gatbik Publishing (GP) e-mail: Info@Gatbik.com Gatbik®, a subdivision of Suham'T LLC Miami, Florida U.S.A. www.Gatbik.com


(754) 204-2130 1750 N. Bayshore Drive #1409 Miami, FL 33132 THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR CONCERN. --Regions (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. The image was published as public domain, saying it wouldn't meet the threshold of originality. Now I've replaced the license with the cc-by license, as you mentioned in your mail.--CennoxX (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014Edit

File:Joel M. Gordon.jpg uploaded by VformationEdit

Dear User CennoxX:

Thank you for the notification message and the work you do to help build Wikimedia Commons.

This message relates to a notification recieved 17:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC) from Wikimedia Commons to me at User Vformation - File tagging File:Joel M. Gordon.jpg (warning: "This media may be deleted")

Below, please find the message sent on 14 January, 2014 1:51:54 PM EST To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, Joel Gordon the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the photo (File:Joel M. Gordon.jpg) that can be viewed at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lovemovement/11942871776/. I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported". I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

SENDER: Joel Gordon (private info X'd out) joel@XXXXXXXXXXXX.org (416) XXX-XXXX

SENDER'S AUTHORITY: Copyright Owner

January 14, 2014 Vformation (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Vformation (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

OTRS Jessica Mae StoverEdit

Hello, I am suspicious about the pictures from User:Redwing2, here and at enwiki. The user uploaded pictures of Jessica Mae Stover, stating, he created them himself. All pictures are small, have no metadata and are from different places/situations and have different styles.

On the last picture in enwiki you added the OTRS, could you please check the permission, if that all is really okay? Thanks, --CennoxX (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

  • I've nominated the first one for deletion. For the others I have rechecked the OTRS ticket and it's OK. Stifle (talk) 17:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear CennoxX,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

hello why have you put a violation of copyright in my discussion page for the file Brooke Elliott.jpg because I just modified this picture

if you answer me please do it in French if you can

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Judor92 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


OTRS permissions queuesEdit

Hello CennoxX. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for this message, I'll think about that.--CennoxX (talk) 16:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File:DarkAngel.svgEdit

 
File:DarkAngel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "CennoxX/Archiv".