User talk:Fridolin freudenfett/Archive 2

File:Mycena cf.jpg

Hallo Fridolin, danke für deine Umbenennungen. Bei der o. g. Datei ist anscheinend etwas schiefgelaufen. Entweder habe ich mich vertippt oder der Punkt im Namen hat Probleme gemacht (Ich glaube, ich habe ".jpg" vergessen). Besser wäre m. E. der Name "Mycena cf amicta - Lindsey 1.jpg". Kannst du das bitte noch mal umbenennen? --Toffel (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Bingo --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 07:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Wrong renaming

I see you moved File:Kolumbiai nagykövetség, 2018 Terézváros.jpg with the rationale "harmonizing names of file set".

1. The original name was correct, because in 2018 the Embassy was in Terézváros.

2. The file name harmonized with all of my files uploade with , 2018 Terézváros.

3. The original file name was Hungarian you incorrectly renamed English.

So I asked You take undo your edits! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't agree. The discussion is still ongoing. Palotabarát (talk) 21:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Please clarify this among yourselves. User Globetrotter19 is a file mover and resetter, he can rename the file himself. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

We clarified. The result of the discuss,with some admin intervention,-was that the renaming was unjustified az átnevezés volt indokolatlan. So I would ask you to undo your edit. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Renamed file Höxter, Fährhaus Luechtringen.jpg

Hallo Fridolin freudenfett, Erst mal vielen Dank für Deine Dienste hier, Du hast schon oft Dateien auf Wunsch verschoben und das ist total wichtig und normalerweise gut. Danke dafür! Bei der Verschiebung der Datei File:Faehrhaus Luechtringen.jpg nach File:Höxter, Fährhaus Luechtringen.jpg bin ich aber der Ansicht, dass dies eine erhebliche Verschlechterung ist. Erstens war der vorhandene Dateiname keineswegs "meaningless" oder "ambigous". Er hat ganz präzise angegeben, was abgebildet ist. Es gibt auch weder in der deutschen Wikipedia noch auf Commons noch bei einer Kurzsuche im Internet ein zweites Lüchtringen. Der alte Name war allerdings wesentlich kürzer, was in der Artikelarbeit durchaus von Vorteil ist, er enthielt keine Satzzeichen, was im Umgang mit einigen Dateisystemen von Vorteil sein kann, er enthielt keine Umlaute, was die Sache erleichtert, wenn Personen mit nicht-deutscher Tastatur den Namen eingeben wollen, und der alte Name ging einheitlich mit Umlauten um - jetzt sind zwei Umlaute enthalten und einer umschrieben ("Luechtringen" sdtatt "Lüchtringen"). Mag sein, dass User:PerfektesChaos gern eine einheitliche Benennung sämtlicher Baudenkmale in Höxter durchsetzen wollte. Das ergäbe durchaus in gewisser Weise Sinn. Die anderen Lüchtringer Bilder sind aber überwiegend nach dem Schema "Höxter OT Lüchtingen Straße Hausnr.jpg" benannt, und ich halte es ohnehin für völlig unmöglich, eine gleichartige Dateibezeichnung in einer Stadt mit so vielen Baudenkmalen durchzudrücken. Aus meiner Sicht grenzt die Aktion, die Umbenennung zu beantragen, hart an Vandalismus. --Dehio (talk) 18:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Du möchtest uns jetzt nicht ernsthaft mitteilen, dass die nachstehenden Dateinamen global eindeutig zuzuordnen sind:

• File:Friedrichstr. 1.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 10.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 1a.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 2.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 3.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 5.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 7.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 8.JPG
• File:Friedrichstr. 9.JPG

In meinem Weltbild gibt es eine Friedrichstraße, wenn überhaupt, dann nur in Berlin, aber wahrscheinlich noch in Hunderten anderer Städte und Dörfer.

Desgleichen:

• File:Am Rathaus 5.JPG
• File:Gartenstr. 3.JPG
• File:Grubestr. 11.JPG
• File:Grubestr. 32.JPG
• File:Grubestr. 34.JPG
• File:Grubestr. 38 (2).JPG
• File:Marktstr. 1.JPG
• File:Marktstr. 11.JPG
• File:Marktstr. 13.JPG
• File:Marktstr. 2.JPG
• File:Marktstr. 23.JPG
• File:Marktstr. 23a.JPG
• File:Marktstr. 9.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 10.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 16.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 2.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 20.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 23.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 24.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 26.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 4.JPG
• File:Neue Str. 8.JPG
• File:Rosenstr. 17.JPG
• File:Rosenstr. 19.JPG
• File:Rosenstr. 2.JPG
• File:Rosenstr. 8.JPG

Ich beantrage dann gleich mal für die alle, das str. auszuschreiben und allen ein Höxter, voranzustellen.

Gibt aber auch noch 100 weitere Knaller dieser Art.

Es ist völlig wurscht, wie es den allerallerwenigsten Platz im Artikel einnehmen wird, es geht hier darum, dass dies ein globales Repositorium ist und es schon in den USA anderthalb Dutzend Orte mit Namen „Berlin“ gibt. Wer soll denn bei Suchtreffern und bei Umgang mit diesen Bildern durchblicken welcher Stadt das zuzuordnen ist?

VG --PerfektesChaos (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Völlig an der Frage vorbei argumentiert. Es gibt Unmengen von Bildern, die zu Recht umbenannt werden müssen, weil sie nicht eindeutig benannt sind. Die oben von User:PerfektesChaos aufgeführten gehören sicherlich dazu. Die eine von mir aufgeführte Datei gehört meines Erachtens nicht dazu, sie ist mit eindeutigem Ortsnamen und Funktionsbezeichnung des Gebäudes eindeutig benannt gewesen, die jetzige Benennung nach der Verschiedbung ist nicht eindeutiger, aber schlechter. Wie viele Orte gibt es in den USA mit Namen "Lüchtringen"? Und wie viele davon besitzen ein Fährhaus? Es mag auch sein, dass die einfach mit reingerutscht ist bei einer größeren Umbenennungsaktion, aber genau das würde ich gern erfahren. Ich hätte ja auch die Rückverschiebung beantragen können, aber das ergibt nur Sinn, wenn ich wüsste, dass es en Versehen oder Vandalismus war. Es könnte ja einen wirklichen Grund gegeben haben. Die Antwort des Verschiebungs-Beantragers spricht allerdings erst mal gegen einen validen Grund. Übrigens ist auch bei nicht eindeutigem Dateinamen eine genaue Zuordnung möglich, sofern die Bilder korrekt kategorisiert wurden. Die Argumentation, dass die Auffindung allein über Dateinamen stattfände, spräche für eine Abschaffung des Kategoriensystems. --Dehio (talk) 09:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Ihr Lieben, ihr seid nicht die Ersten, die sich über Umbenennungen beschweren. Man sollte als Dateimover schon ein bisschen mitdenken, aber letztendlich sind die Veranlasser der Umbenennung verantwortlich, weshalb ich nicht der richtige Ansprechpartner bin. Der vorherige Dateiname war zwar nicht "meaningless" oder "ambigous", das Voranstellen des Ortsnamens in der Originalschreibweise ist IMHO aber eindeutig eine Verbesserung. Es gibt keinen Grund hier auf Umlaute zu verzichten, da wir ja ein multilinguales Projekt sind und die uns bekannten Suchmaschinen sowas durchaus handhaben können, besser wäre aber Lüchtringen, beides mit Umlauten. Im Übrigen sollte man sich nicht so ernst nehmen und sich auf ernsthaftere Arbeit konzentrieren. Im Übrigen könnt ihr die Datei gerne wieder umbenennen und, ach ja, so viele Baudenkmale sind es in Höxter ja nun auch nicht. Bleibt gesund und viele Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Danke für die Stimme der Vernunft. Beschweren wollte ich mich hauptsächlich beim Beantrager der Verschiebung, nur in zweiter Linie bei Dir. Der Ortsname war ja angegeben, man kann ihn natürlich auch voranstellen; ich hab mich damals eher an der Artikelbenennung in der deutschen WIkipedia orientiert. Bezüglich Umlaute: Die Suchmaschinensuche ist nicht das Problem. Aber wenn ich z.B. einen Artikel in der deutschen Wikipedia über einen Ort/ein Bauwerk in Frankreich schreiben wollte, dann würde ich defintiv bei der Bebilderung Fotos bevorzugen, deren Bezeichnung ich mit der deutschen Tastatur eingeben kann, sofern es sie gibt und die anderen Bilder nicht viel besser sind. Ich denke, das geht anderen anderswo auch so, und der Verzicht auf Umlaute und das Bemühen nach kurzen Namen erhöht geringfügig die internationale Verwendbarkeit (nicht unbedingt die Auffindbarkeit) sowie die Lesbarkeit des Quelltextes. Die Argumentation des Antragstellers oben finde ich unter aller Kritik. Aber Du hast recht, es gibt echt wichtigere Dinge, das Bild ist so oder so auffindbar, und wenn nicht, ist es ja auch nicht schlimm. Danke Dir, eine gute Woche und bleib auch Du gesund! --Dehio (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Lingua Libre files renaming

Hello,

Yesterday I asked for the renaming of 3 files from Lingua Libre, because of a mistake from the speaker during our training session. She set the Record Wizard to "duf", pronounced the words in the language but wrote them in French. You renamed two of them, thank you for that, but you seem to have forgotten this one. Could you please rename it into "File:LL-Q6983819 (duf)-Nékoro Joséphine-ve oo.wav"? Thank you very much. — WikiLucas (🖋️) 16:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
PS: As an administrator of Lingua Libre, I will have to rename many erreneous files in the future. I am thus requesting the filemover rights here.

Bonne idée de devenir vous-même un filemover ! J'ai renommé le fichier. Rester en bonne santé! Salutations --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

There are still hundreds more mixed-script files

I don't want to spam the same long message on everyone's talk page. See User talk:Fallaner for the details. HotdogPi (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

What is a meaningless or ambiguous name

I saw you renamed File:Omron Blood Pressure Monitor.jpg to File:Omron HEM-7000 20110121.jpg, citing criteria 2. In what way was the former name meaningless? Of course it was ambiguous, as is any filename – the name is not meant to convey all information on an image – but to me "blood pressure monitor" says quite a lot more than "HEM-7000 20110121", quite enough for a file name. The model number, date of photography and other related information can very well be told in categories and in the file description.

The user who requested the change was not the uploader. I think the uploader's choice of name should be respected, unless there is a strong reason not to.

I understand that it is easy to trust the user who requests a name change to be in good faith and know what they are doing – but file movers and administrators have the responsibility to check that a requested move is in accord with policy and best practices. I understand mistakes can easily happen, and in this case I neither have a strong opinion on what name is better nor know whether the uploader cares. I am just worried, because I have seen many file moves done on too weak reasons.

–LPfi (talk) 19:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Elliot Page - dead-naming in historical images. Sorry for not discussing this with you first. I'm not accusing you of anything wrong, but my interpretation of the guidelines seems to differ from yours (given that you've already moved the file), and I wished to get another opinion if my reading was right or wrong and how to organize other images of people who also has changed their name following coming out as trans..

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Side view of the entrance to the Nangang International Exhibition Center, Hall2.jpg

According to the official English name? If so, why not rename to File:Side view of the entrance to TaiNEX2.jpg? Also, have you confirmed that his request is necessary before file renaming? Because the official English name I saw is "Taipei Nangang Exhibition Center, Hall2". See: the official website.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Passage Miriam Makeba Paris.jpg

File:Passage Miriam Makeba Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Warning!

mini

I have give the original number of the sign! Look at my source. I can not understand people her at the Wikipedia - who do things that go against all seriousness and sense. Mediatus (talk) 13:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Es ist zwar unschön, wenn man dir dein Schäufelchen weggenommen hat, aber auch Premiumautoren sollten gewisse Umgangsformen einhalten und keine Warnungen aussprechen. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

File renamings

Next time, make sure you enact file renamings that are according to actual policy, not just random whim. No need to do anthing thing about the case I noticed, though, as the previous filename will be used to restore access to the original file that had been overwritten by the same misguided user who requested the filename you enacted. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

(Globale) Dateiverwendung nach Umbenennung nicht mehr erkennbar

Hallo Fridolin, danke nochmal für die schnelle Erfüllung meines Umbenennungswunsches von File:Sudeten_m.svg in File:Divisions of the Sudetes.svg! Nun eine generelle Frage: Wie bekomme ich nach der Umbenennung heraus, auf welchen Seiten die Datei (noch mit dem alten Namen) eingebunden ist? Unter den zwei Abschnitten "(Globale) Dateiverwendung" stehen nur noch eine handvoll, davor waren es gefühlt 30 oder 40 Verwendungen. Auch über What links here (neuer Dateiname) und What links here (alter Dateiname) komme ich auch nicht an mein Ziel. Wo ist mein Fehler? Danke und beste Grüße, --W like wiki ^{good to know} 14:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hallo W like wiki, die Frage habe ich mir auch schon oft gestellt. Es scheint so zu sein, dass bei wenigen Verwendungen die Umbenennung sofort geschicht, während bei vielen (Grenze kenne ich nicht), die Umbenennung mittes Dateilinkerbot geschieht, in diesem Fall ist die Verwendung nich mehr ersichtlich. Wenn du auf Konzept-URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) klickst, werden einige verwendete Sites angezeigt. Ob das tatsächlich alle sind, vermag ich aber nicht zu sagen. AFAIK war die Liste der Verwendung doch ganz schön lang. Sorry, dass ich dir nicht mehr sagen kann. Vielleicht kann man dir hier deine Fragen beantworten. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 08:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

"Konzept-URI" - wow, was es nicht alles gibt, war mir noch nie aufgefallen dieser Nerd-Link :)! Was der so richtig bewirkt, hab ich nicht verstanden, geholfen hat er (mein) Problem betreffend leider auch nicht. Für mich scheint das ganze eine elementare Schwäche wenn nicht gar ein Fehler (der Software?) zu sein. Der Logik nach müssten ja zumindest über What links here des alten Dateinamens die Seiten aufgeführt sein! Es wäre wichtig, schließlich ist es ja angeraten, Bilder oder auch Artikel nicht über Weiterleitungsseiten sondern direkt zu verlinken. Wie soll ich nach der Umbenennung einer Datei rausbekommen, auf welchen Wiki-Seiten noch die alten Dateinamen stehen (um ihn dort mit dem neuen Namen zu ersetzen)? Aber ich glaube, jetzt wiederhole ich mich. Warum bist du als File-Mover der Sache noch nicht näher nachgegangen?? Auf jeden Fall war mir dann gestern Abend aufgefallen, dass unter Abschnitt "Globale Dateiverwendung" ein paar mehr Links dazugekommen waren - so als ob commons nur Stück für Stück die Nachricht von den anderen Wikis reinbekommt. Allerdings ist der Prozess jetzt irgendwie stehen geblieben, viele Einträge fehlen noch. An ein paar Orte kann ich mich noch erinnern, so z.B. it:Sudeti Orientali, en:Diduni, fr:Monts de Lusace, uk:Судети und wikiversity:de:Kurs:Die Nisaner – Dresdens Ureinwohner. Grüße, --W like wiki ^{good to know} 09:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

File talk:Imaginary portrait of Jonas Sungaila (Johannes Sunigail) or mythical Simeon Sunigaylo.jpg

Hello. Why did you move the file without even noticing the discussion on the talk page? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Renaming St. Michael church files

Please, resolve (rename) the rest... Current status is inconsistency. --Obsuser (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Turtle Renaming

Sorry I am probably giving you a lot of work. I curate the largest collection of turtle specimens in the world and am a known world expert at identifying turtles and also a turtle taxonomist and paleontologist. People come to me all the time for turtle identifications. I did not realize how many unidentified turtle photos were here. I can id most of them, trying to prioritize for ones there are little to no other pictures of at the moment, so they will actually become useful. Will probably do 20-30 a day in lumps. I can be reached on Wikispecies (my user page here just points to WS, if needed, if anyone questions an identification, am a Crat and CU, also an Ombud. Cheers Faendalimas (talk) 15:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Never mind, don't mention it. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Please note that the file you renamed to File:Chrysemys picta Painted Turtle USA.jpg (by request) was not taken in USA, but in Canada, so the file is incorrectly named. Mindmatrix 16:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The species is very rare in Canada and is generally known as a US species, however fair enough. It does occur there too. Cheers Faendalimas (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

I hope this File:Chrysemys picta Painted Turtle Ontario (CAN).jpg is OK for you. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Absolutely, thanks, cheers Faendalimas (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

renames for hyphen to endash

Please just reject rename requests that are just asking for a file rename based on an hyphen to endash, especially on files that have many uses. It is not an error, and that someone has a preference is not really enough reason to act. That it has taken two weeks to flow through to all the wikis should be an indicator that it is all just problematic. Thanks for your understanding.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Not moving djvu / pdf works transcluded at Wikisources

Hi. Please do not move the Wikisource djvu or pdf works that are transcluded; there is a direct relationship between File:/Index:/Page: namespaces and it can just cause issues when they are moved. Thanks for your understanding.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

File renames

@Fridolin freudenfett and David V.: As regards this rename, IMHO it doesn't fall under Criterion 6 – non-controversial technical issues) but rather under contraindication #1: "Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better." Missing spaces after punctuation are exactly the case, which must not be a reason to rename the file, unless the uploader himself asks for the rename.

Every file rename triggers a series of other actions, automatic link replacement, and in some cases, it causes technical problems with links that cannot be automatically replaced (due to the phab:T275058 bug, usages of redirected images become hidden and e.g. Commons:Monuments database/Images without id lists produce false positives etc.) --ŠJů (talk) 04:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@ŠJů: I'm beginner on Commons, so I don't know criterions for renaming very much. In my opinion, the reason for change "XY.století" to "XY. století" is not "because the new name looks a bit better", but because it's mistake in Czech. But it's only my opinion. David V. (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@David V.: Generally, obvious spelling mistakes are allowed for rename, while simplified/undstandard capitalization or spacing, or missing diacritics are considered as "cosmetic" (typographic) issues and renaming rules dissuade from renaming such files. Names as "NoveMestoNaMorave.JPG" or "Nové-město-na-moravě.jpg" or "Praha10strasnice.jpg" should be also accepted. Filenames are not required to be typographically standard. Of course, it's no problem if someone individually improves any name (and there's no reason to revert the renames), but unnecessary bulk file renaming is exactly what the rule is intended to prevent. (Btw., spacing after punctuation is traditionally considered as a typographic issue, not as an orthographic issue. That's why especially older (less observant) people from pre-computer era are often uneducated about it. These issues were not explicitly taught in handwriting era.)

This apply for file names only. As regards categories, their names should be perfectly correct. (Just hyphens are often tolerated as a substitute for dashes, here at Commons, but such detailed rules or customs can change with time.) Also language policy (preference for English or scientific/original names and Latin alphabet) apply only for category names, not for file names. --ŠJů (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

• And one more. @Fridolin freudenfett: Unless you have a good explanation why a Polish language diagram is better labelled in English rather than in Polish (with the added gall of calling it «meaningless») and furthermore why would such “improvement” be acceptable given COM:FR, I suggest you make hast in undoing this and similar renamings you’ve been doing, least you find youself at AN/U. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

E.g. to harmonize filenames. A quick look at Category:Mormon plan of salvation diagrams would have made that clear to you. By the way, I don't like threats and patronizing. Happy Easter. --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 10:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

• I see you don’t have a good explanation: Filename harmonization is only a renaming concern when some kind of automated parsing is needed, such as when files are used in templates, which is not the case here. If you don’t like what you wrongly call «threats and patronizing», then avoid infringing against established guidelines. I myself don’t like filename instability and, in this case, the incredibly rude, anglocentric notion that anything that’s not in English is therefore «meaningless». -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

What's meaningless (or ambiguous) about "Maria Adelheid habsburg toscana 1822 1855"?

Hello, I noticed a rename of a file used on Wikidata and I was wondering what is meaningless or ambiguous about the (fairly specific) name "Maria Adelheid habsburg toscana 1822 1855"?. You renamed this to (the more generic) "Ritratto di Maria Adelaide di Lorena". Can you explain? --- Jura1 (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Bitte bei Verschiebungen sensibel vorgehen

Hallo, Du hattest meiner Erinnerung nach schonmal meine Dateien auf meinen *eigenen Hochladerwunsch* verschoben (eigene Fehler im Dateiname), dafür nachträglich Danke!

Nur war mir vor einiger Zeit eine recht unsinnige Verschiebung meiner Dateien auf *fremden Wunsch hin* aufgefallen. Der konkrete Fall ist mir nicht so wirklich wichtig, aber da derjenige ganz offenbar die Problematik nicht verstehen kann oder will, möchte ich dich auf meine ihm gegenüber geäußerten Einwände hinweisen:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APerfektesChaos&type=revision&diff=552404389&oldid=550684463

verbunden mit dem Wunsch bei Verschiebungen bitte sensibel vorzugehen. Gruß ... Baummapper (talk) 16:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for rights#`Fridolin freudenfett (revoke)

A user has made the request for your filemover rights to be removed. Would you care to comment on the request at the above link. A summary of what you see is the issue at hand, and the measures that you have taken to resolve them, and any corrective actions and learnings that you have had following user feedback. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

• File mover has been removed per the above discussion. ~riley (talk) 20:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Fridolin freudenfett,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Fridolin freudenfett,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rummelsburg Übersicht.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rummelsburg Übersicht.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 12:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Mistake in requesting the rename on my part

Hello, thanks for moving the image I requested, File:Greek Orthodox Churches' flag.svg. However, I mistakenly asked for a rename to an improper name, and explained why in the new request for renaming. Could you please go throught my renaming request without leaving a redirect? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veverve (talk • contribs) 23:14, 31 October 2020‎ (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Lothar Wieler RKI.jpg

File:Lothar Wieler RKI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gnom (talk) 20:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Schnelllöschantrag

Hallo Fridolin, könntest Du diese Datei löschen? Der Benutzter, der das Foto hochgeladen hat, hat über die Telefonberatung um Löschung gebeten, da persönliche Daten im Foto enthalten sind, was ihm zuvor entgangen ist. Er hat bereits den Löschantrag gestellt, aber bisher hat sich niemand gekümmert. Das wäre super. --Berlinschneid (talk) 19:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Nee, sorry, ich bin kein Admin. Frag doch mal z.B. User:Sebastian Wallroth. Grüße --Fridolin freudenfett (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Hallo User:Berlinschneid und User:Fridolin freudenfett, ich bin auf Commons auch kein Admin. Hier die Liste der Commons-Admins. Herzliche Grüße, --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:52, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Lynarstraße_(Berlin-Schmargendorf)

Category:Lynarstraße_(Berlin-Schmargendorf) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 15:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Kehlheimer_Straße_(Berlin-Wilmersdorf)

Category:Kehlheimer_Straße_(Berlin-Wilmersdorf) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 16:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Rauentaler_Straße_(Berlin-Wilmersdorf)

Category:Rauentaler_Straße_(Berlin-Wilmersdorf) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Schwanfeldstraße_(Berlin-Charlottenburg-Nord)

Category:Schwanfeldstraße_(Berlin-Charlottenburg-Nord) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 19:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Wangemheimstraße_(Berlin-Schmargendorf)

Category:Wangemheimstraße_(Berlin-Schmargendorf) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Bernard-Wieck-Promenade_(Berlin-Grunewald)

Category:Bernard-Wieck-Promenade_(Berlin-Grunewald) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Kindworthsteig_(Berlin-Grunewald)

Category:Kindworthsteig_(Berlin-Grunewald) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 21:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you Fridolin freudenfett! – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 00:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Epihanienweg_(Berlin-Westend)

Category:Epihanienweg_(Berlin-Westend) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

BerlinBerlinBerlinBerlin (talk) 20:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Paris Miss.Tic.JPG

File:Paris Miss.Tic.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Paris Miss.Tic Rue Corvisart.jpg

File:Paris Miss.Tic Rue Corvisart.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 06:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Proud Boys Flag, enlarged laurel.png

This image is not Fred Perry logo but an image similar to it (see here). Please, do not request rename from one incorrect name to another one. If the image is not related to Proud Boys in any way, maybe it should be nominated for deletion? Ankry (talk) 21:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hallo,

eines deiner Bilder scheint auf der Seite http://www.berlin-1a.de/cha-wil.html#wilmersdorf verwendet zu werden (evtl. weitere auf anderen Seiten dieser Domain) - mit der Kennzeichnung "Public Domain". Dies entspricht nicht der Kennzeichnung des Bildes hier. Der Betreiber Michael Folger scheint die Lizenzen nicht ganz so sorgfältig zu prüfen und die Bilder einfach als "Public Domain" zu kennzeichnen, bis sich jemand beschwert. Gruß, -- Schusch 09:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

File:Mitte Schinkelplatz.jpg

File:Mitte Schinkelplatz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 07:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Rambert05.jpg

File:Rambert05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Arang Kel.jpg

File:Arang Kel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 10:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Mitte Gartenstraße Stadtbad Foyer-002.jpg

File:Mitte Gartenstraße Stadtbad Foyer-002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Nikon D200 side aka Standardobjektiv Birdy.jpg

Why did you fool rename that file. The "typing error" was an intended pun. --2003:CD:F730:6E00:84B4:1C41:970D:5840 16:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Berlin-Mitte U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel-001.jpg

And also:

• File:Berlin-Mitte U-Bahnhof Museumsinsel.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File:تمثال في برلين.jpg

Ich habe deine Änderung bei diesem Bild rückgängig gemacht. Inwieweit ist auf diesem Bild die Siegessäule dargestellt? Die Viktoria Statue ist golden. Gruß Lukas Beck (talk) 11:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)