Ilya Varlamov

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ilya Varlamov!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Шаблон Creator

Здравствуйте, большое спасибо, что приняли решение публиковать такое огромное количество фото под свободной лицензией!

Хотел бы попросить вас использовать при заливках созданный ещё в 2010 году для свободных снимков с "Фликра" ваш шаблон автора: |Author={{Creator:Ilya Varlamov}}. Он позволяет удобнее контролировать число и категоризацию ваших фотографий, плюс подтягивает много всякого с Викиданных (см. пример использования), чем позволяет вам немного отличаться от большинства фотографов на Викисладе (они не проходят по энциклопедической значимости и не имеют права на авторский шаблон). ;-) Ain92 (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

P.S. И если вас не затруднит, залейте сюда (прямая ссылка) версию фото разрешением повыше, чтобы можно было выровнять горизонт и аккуратно кадрировать. Это редкая советская пушка, к слову) Ain92 (talk) 21:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

При ручной загрузке через UploadWizard его дико неудобно использовать. Потом я ботом заменю. А когда роботизируем загрузку, то конечно. --Kaganer (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Ваши категории

Зачем же вы, когда создаёте новые категории, помещаете их в самое себя, как например 2019 in Yakutsk? Это не имеет никакого смысла и такую категорию нигде нельзя найти. Если уж вы решили не только загружать фотографии, но и создавать для них новые категории -- будьте так добры делать это по правилам. "2019 in Sakha Republic" должна быть в категориях "2019 in Russia" и "Sakha Republic by year". "2019 in Yakutsk" должна быть в категориях "2019 in Sakha Republic" и "History of Yakutsk" (последняя вместо "Yakutsk by year", которая пока не существует -- если же её создавать, то в категории "Sakha Republic by year" и "History of Yakutsk"). Не находите ли, что такой вариант не только соответствует правилам проекта, но и куда более осмыслен и логичен? Спасибо. --A.Savin 00:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

• Да, спасибо, сразу не разобрался. --Ilya Varlamov 00:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

  Спасибо, что стараетесь. Вот тут вы забыли добавить "Astana by year", коллега уже исправил. И ещё постарайтесь не забывать о правильном ключе сортировки. Дело в том, что у нас категории в вышестоящей категории по умолчанию перечислены в алфавитном порядке по их названию, но часто бывает так, что их имеет смысл сортировать, например, по названию города. Как в случае с "2019 в такой-то стране". --A.Savin 02:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Благодарю за подсказки, постараюсь не нарушать правила категорий. Сейчас сделал категории для Темиртау по аналогии, надеюсь, все верно. --Ilya Varlamov 22:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

• Илья, приветствую. Можно не проставлять категорию "2019 in Kazakhstan", если в фотографии присутствует подкатегория "2019 in Temirtau". Всяческих успехов! --Mitte27 (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Привет, спасибо за подсказку, учту. -- Ilya Varlamov 23:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Про коптер

На этот раз я не ругаться из-за категорий пришёл)) Я сам снимаю с коптера, мне стало любопытно, когда вы выложили фотки из Мирного (например File:Mirny - 190227 DJI 0837.jpg). Доселе я исходил из того, что не следует и думать в мороз -20—30° поднимать его даже на 20 метров, если не хочешь, чтобы батарея в считанные минуты загнулась и игрушка упала. Я очень осторожно пробовал снимать при температуре немногим ниже нуля, батарея выстояла, но и тогда имело место такое явление, как обледенение корпуса. Как же у вас всё получилось в якутские морозы, ежели не секрет? Спасибо. --A.Savin 02:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

В тот день было довольно тепло, около -10, и коптером я пользовался недолго, так что он не успел обледенеть или разрядиться. -- Ilya Varlamov 19:53, 09 April 2019 (UTC)

Лицензия

Здравствуйте! Выбранная Вами лицензия предполагает, что любой может свободно «создавать производные – переделывать данное произведение». Правильно ли понимать, что можно свободно использовать также фрагменты Ваших фото и их самостоятельно обработанные в редакторе версии? Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 08:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

• Так в этом и есть суть лицензии CC-BY-SA. Она, в частности, позволяет убирать с фотографий «вотермарки» (о чём Илью предупредили). --ssr (talk) 09:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Я бы не спрашивал прямо, если бы на одном сайте администратор не написал, что «Да, можно [использовать фото Варламова на сайте] при условии авторства Варламова и указании в допе его авторства. Но кадрировать и улучшать нельзя!!! Разрешения на это он не давал…», «Вдруг это опечатка в выборе лицензии, прямая воля эту опцию не предполагает». Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 09:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
    • Очень странное мнение администратора. Действительности оно, я так понимаю, не соответствует. Акроним SA в названии лицензии означает "share-alike", что означает именно возможность создания производных произведений. А все доступные на Викискладе лицензии подразумевают либо эти условия, либо более свободные — а более жёсткие условия недоступны. --ssr (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Уважайте авторские права

Здравствуйте, прошу извинить, что снова вас беспокою, но причина уважительная. Очень прошу -- когда вы берёте для вашего блога фотографии с Викисклада, уважайте авторские права фотографов и указывайте точный источник и имя или ник автора. Например, в вашем посте "Посмотри, как похорошела Варшава!" вы используете мою фотографию Мариенштата и там только подпись "Фото: Wikipedia", при этом прямая ссылка на оригинальное фото отсутствует. Но ни Википедия, ни Викисклад не являются автором какого-либо из тех изображений, что здесь имеются. В случае с Мариенштатом корректно было бы подписать, например, следующим образом: "Фото: A.Savin, WikiCommons". Ещё лучше -- снабдив эту подпись прямой ссылкой на фото. К слову, это, судя по всему, далеко не единственный случай, когда в вашем блоге материал из Викисклада использовался не в соответствии с условиями свободной лицензии. Уважайте чужие права, и ваши права тоже будут уважать (что, как я понял, для вас как фотографа тоже немаловажно). И не забудьте, пожалуйста, дать указание вашим сотрудникам, которые готовят посты к публикации, чтобы впредь корректно подписывали чужие фотографии -- в том числе (и в особенности) те, что с Википедии/Викисклада.

Я думаю, вы меня поймёте и вам не нужно такие вещи лишний раз объяснять. Единственное, раз уж вы "провинились", у меня лично к вам дополнительно есть небольшая просьба. Если можно, пожалуйста, НЕ выкладывайте на Викисклад фотографии, которые вы сделали в Железнодорожном районе Читы. Ваш блог -- это совсем другое дело, это мощный медийный ресурс, рассчитанный на российского читателя, в том числе и представителей власти, и с его помощью можно привлечь внимание широкой общественности и помочь изменить дело к лучшему. Но Викисклад и Википедия -- это проекты совсем о другом, Викисклад вообще проект международный, и я не хочу, чтобы коллеги из других стран видели такие вот зарисовки современной российской жизни. Это никак не поможет что-либо изменить, зато вот лично мне тупо за державу обидно, you know? Спасибо. Удачи. --A.Savin 02:44, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

• Первая часть вашего совета упускает из вида то, что при атрибуции материалов по лицензии CC-BY-SA нужно указывать эту лицензию как условие распространения этих материалов. Вы что, не знали об этом? И советы теперь даёте? Вы даёте неправильные советы, всякий распространяемый по лицензии CC-BY-SA материал должен содержать указание на эту лицензию, в вашем примере это было бы как минимум так: "Фото: A. Savin, Wikimedia Commons, CC-BY-SA". Атрибуция в виде гиперссылки на Викисклад будет содержать указание на лицензию по гиперссылке. Ну а вторая часть вашего совета — прямо советская цензура какая-то. На Викискладе нет цензуры советского образца, есть понятие Commons:Рамки проекта. Оттуда исключается всякий спам, нарушения авторских прав, нецелевое использование, но цензуры советского образца, как вы предлагаете, там нет и быть не может. Залитую на Викисклад фотографию, если она вписывается в project scope, нельзя удалить даже по желанию автора: лицензия CC-BY-SA неотзывная, это даже в РИА "Новости" уже запомнили. --ssr (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Во-первых, лично мне вполне достаточно, чтобы при использовании моих фотографий указывали просто A.Savin, WikiCommons. Это вполне в духе лицензии и я не понимаю, что здесь такого. Плохо -- это когда фото не атрибутируют вообще или пишут "Источник: Википедия". Во-вторых, второй абзац моего комментария -- не цензура или попытка что-либо запретить, а просто просьба. Не видите разницу -- ваша проблема, а не моя. А в-третьих, сообщение для Ильи, а не для вас ;-) --A.Savin 14:46, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
    • Это сообщение для всех пользователей Викисклада, а не только для Ильи или вас — для такого существует личная переписка. Здесь же общедоступный форум, на котором пользователи Викисклада могут и должны друг друга поправлять при виде ошибок для большей конструктивности совместных действий. Так работает Википедия. Вот я вижу ошибку, что вы про лицензию неправильно Илью учите, вот я вас и поправляю. Один наш участник считает, что неуказание лицензии может быть поводом для суда. То, что вы называете словом "плохо", точки зрения лицензий "незаконно", а это хуже, чем просто "плохо". И учить новых участников надо "как законно", а не "как вам достаточно". Одна фотография Ильи из Читы уже залита ещё 9 числа и ждёт, когда Илья обновит её оригинальной версией в высоком разрешении. Для этого надо не загружать новый файл, а обновить существующий с помощью функции "Upload a new version of this file". Это я Илье сейчас объясняю, не вам. --ssr (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
      • Ну, если вы сейчас будете устраивать здесь ликбез по тому, как в идеале нужно выполнять требования CreativeCommons, то тогда добавьте и теоретически имеющую место быть обязанность цитировать полный текст лицензии. Моя-то цель была -- как можно более просто и доходчиво объяснить, как уж точно НЕ нужно использовать фотографии с Викисклада. Если мы будем тут устраивать лекции по юриспруденции и грозить судом -- это приведёт только к тому, что Илья просто махнёт рукой и забьёт на выкладывание своих архивов, и это вполне можно будет понять. Это и есть то, чего вы добиваетесь? И ваши абсурдные обвинения в цензуре (которая не имеет место здесь быть, ибо это просто вежливая просьба, которую Илья вправе проигнорировать, но, надеюсь, хотя бы отнесётся к ней с пониманием) вы, напомню, так ничем и не подкрепили. --A.Savin 15:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
        • Про полный текст лицензии это вы, кажется, с GNU FDL напутали. Краткое описание лицензии CC-BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ этого требования не содержит — и именно это было одной из причин создания этой лицензии. Впрочем, это вы тут админ, а не я, и правильной была бы ситуация когда бы мне НЕ пришлось вас поправлять. Я никаким судом не грозил и лекций по юриспруденции не устраивал, я вас, админа, поправлял по существу поднятых вами вопросов о Викискладе, потому что это важная тема здесь для всех. "Увидел ошибку — поправь", есть такой википедийный "закон" (в отличие от лицензии, это не закон, а "закон"). И в "цензуре" это не "обвинение" было, а указание на то, что класть такие фотографии на Викисклад скорее нужно, чем не нужно — и, более того, одна уже лежит, и её надо перезалить. То есть опять тема, которую нужно уточнять, хотя вы могли сразу так написать, чтобы уточнять было НЕ надо. --ssr (talk) 15:38, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
          • "Ну а вторая часть вашего совета — прямо советская цензура какая-то" -- не обвинение в цензуре? Ну окей. --A.Savin 16:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC) Насчёт полного текста лицензии вы правы, но суть сказанного это не сильно меняет... --A.Savin 16:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

• And here we go again. "Пять крутых маршрутов на майские из Москвы", рекламный пост, используется File:Ipatiev02.jpg, на этот раз нет даже упоминания Википедии. --A.Savin 00:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо Илья

Надо бы Вам посадить человека на загрузку, иначе Вы завязнете в технических работах. Архив то немалый.--Трифонов Андрей (talk) 22:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190205-DSC 0989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190206-DSC 1343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190207-DSC 1602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190206-DSC 1500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190206-DSC 1297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe a bit noisy, but this is a matter of taste. --Aristeas 10:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190205-DSC 0993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy, but OK for a night shot imo --Isiwal 12:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190204-DSC 0758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190207-DSC 1601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190206-DSC 1497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190206-DSC 1302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190205-DSC 0816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holocaust History Museum, Yad Vashem - Hall of Names - 20190206-DSC 1303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190205-DSC 0819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 17:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Novosibirsk - 190225 DSC 4351.jpg

File:Novosibirsk - 190225 DSC 4351.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Novosibirsk - 190225 DSC 4359.jpg

File:Novosibirsk - 190225 DSC 4359.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Novosibirsk - 190225 DSC 4362.jpg

File:Novosibirsk - 190225 DSC 4362.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Moscow (2019-07-27), photo by Ilya Varlamov DSC 2269.jpg

File:Moscow (2019-07-27), photo by Ilya Varlamov DSC 2269.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Jerusalem - 20190206-DSC 1276.jpg

File:Jerusalem - 20190206-DSC 1276.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 11:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerusalem - 20190205-DSC 0991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Mirny - 190226 DSC 4509.jpg

File:Mirny - 190226 DSC 4509.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Palestine - 20190204-DSC 0060.jpg

File:Palestine - 20190204-DSC 0060.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: picture of an image in an exposition of an hotel Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Hannolans (talk) 05:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nur-Sultan - 190217 DSC 3460.jpg

And also:

• File:Nur-Sultan - 190217 DSC 3462.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Astana - 190217 DSC 3947.jpg

File:Astana - 190217 DSC 3947.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nur-Sultan - 190217 DSC 3740.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Mirny - 190226 DSC 4753.jpg

File:Mirny - 190226 DSC 4753.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 00:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Mirny - 190226 DSC 4756.jpg

File:Mirny - 190226 DSC 4756.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 00:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nur-Sultan - 190217 DSC 3398.jpg

And also:

• File:Nur-Sultan - 190217 DSC 3452.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)