User talk:Jeuwre/archive

Die ist das Archiv der Beiträge auf meiner commons-Diskussionsseite. Ich verschiebe ab und zu die Beiträge von Hand, wenn Sie abgeschlossen sind.

Danke!

Hallo Jeuwre,

vielen Dank für all deine Audio-Dateien. Die sind echt klasse! --Nicor (talk) 20:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Nicor,

danke für die Blumen. Die Audio-Qualität läßt wirklich noch viel Raum nach oben: Übersteuern, Zischen, Poppen, Mikro-Rauschen, Nebengeräusche, alles dabei. Das ist etwas, was mich zwar betrübt, was ich aber z.Zt. nicht ändern kann. Aber ich denke, besser auch in einer so mäßigen Hör-Qualität, als gar nicht. --Jeuwre (talk)

Liegt das an der Technik mit der du arbeitest? Was nutzt du denn derzeit? --Nicor (talk) 12:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Das liegt an der Technik: eine Logitech C270 Webcam im Wert von € 23,-- :-) (lag hier rum). Zum Schneiden Audacity, dass tut's und ist kostenfrei. Traum: ein USB-Kondensator-Mikro, z.B. ein Rode NT-USB oder ähnlich, einfach in der Handhabung, und der Klang könnte, wenn man den 'Rezensionen' eines großen Versandhändlers Glauben schenken mag, akzeptabel sein. Will ich mir z.Zt. nicht leisten, dass wäre fast das nächste halbe Fahrrad für meinen Sohn und der geht vor. Na ja, ich mache ja keine Beiträge zur gesprochenen Wikipedia, das geht mit dem Mikro einfach nicht. Aber falls jemand etwas gutes Gebrauchtes im Schrank zu liegen hat, das er/sie nicht mehr nutzt ... --Jeuwre (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:De-Schmetterling-.ogg

Hallo. Is diese Datei anders als File:De-Schmetterling.ogg? --Derbeth ^talk 20:35, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Derbeth, die Datei File:De-Schmetterling-.ogg ist die Gültige! Bei der anderen habe ich überbetont, ein hartes 'k' am Ende ist nicht korrekt bei einer Endung auf 'ung'.

Die beiden Dateien habe ich ganz am Anfang meiner Zeit bei wiktionary eingesprochen, als ich noch nicht wußte, wie man Dateien auf commons korrigiert/erneut hochlädt. --Jeuwre (talk) 20:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Kann ich also File:De-Schmetterling.ogg für Entfernung nominieren? Man konnte dann De-Schmetterling-.ogg zum De-Schmetterling.ogg umnennen. --Derbeth ^talk 22:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Das wäre o.k.. Ich müßte nur wissen, wann tatsächlich gelöscht wird: Denn die Verknüpfung auf de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Schmetterling in die ...ogg sollte dann zeitnah geändert werden. Oder das macht dann Dein bot :-) --Jeuwre (talk) 22:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Eigentlich es wäre besser und einfacher, wenn Du die neueste Datei aus "Schmetterling-" als eine neue Version von "Schmetterling" hochlüdest. Dann könnten wir überall "Schmetterling-" durch "Schmetterling" ersetzen und endlich "Schmetterling-" entfernen. --Derbeth ^talk 07:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Ich habe 'Schmetterling' eben neu eingesprochen und hochgeladen unter De-Schmetterling.ogg. De-Schmetterling-.ogg kann gelöscht werden, wenn ich die Verknüpfung im deutschen wiktionary-Eintrag Schmetterling geändert habe. Mache ich nachher. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Derbeth, danke, dass Du schneller beim Ändern zu De-Schmetterling.ogg warst.
Das war ja eine Korrektur. Welche Worte kann Dein Bot verknüpfen? In einer kurzen Stichprobe der von mir auf commons hochgeladenen Worte habe ich im deutschen Wiktionary nur einen verknüpften Beitrag (besonders) gefunden. Einige andere Hochgeladene nicht: Substantive (Leichtmetall, Medaille, Platin), Adjektive (betrunken), Verben (absolvieren). Gibt es eine Ursache oder sollte ich die Beiträge besser von Hand im deutschen Wiktionary einstellen? Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 08:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Archipel.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Archipel.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright-tag is added --Jeuwre (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kleiner Junge.jpg

And also:

• File:Balancing.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-jemands.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-jemands.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Kategorie für Sprachbeispiele nach Themen

Hallo Jeuwre,

ich wollte dich kurz auf diese Kategorie hinweisen. Die Kategoriestruktur ist noch sehr klein und ausbaufähig, aber deine Audio-Dateien könnten auch dort den jeweiligen (bereits oder noch nicht existierenden) Unterkategorien zugeordnet werden. Es wäre dann möglich auch themenorientiert nach Sprachbeispielen zu suchen.

Viele Grüße, --Nicor (talk) 10:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Nicor, eigentlich müsste man das durchstrukturieren: ich hätte drei Themen, nach denen ich differenzieren würde: 1.) Thema/Fachgebiet, 2.) Herkunft 3.) Wortart. Das würde zu (vorerst) folgenden Gruppen führen:

Zu 1.) German pronunciation of ...

• legal and related terms
• medical and related terms
• pharmaceutic and related terms
• terms of the human body
• hospital terms
• professions
• biological and related terms
• chemical and related terms
• physical and related terms
• technical and related terms
• agriculture and related terms
• religious and related terms
• economic and related terms
• weather terms
• music and related terms
• sport terms
• military terms
• food and related terms
• hunting terms
• nautical terms
• ...

zu 2.) German pronunciation of ...

• terms with Latin origin
• terms with Greek origin
• terms with Arabic origin
• terms with French origin
• terms with English origin

zu 3.) in Ahnlehnung an die grammatische Einteilung im Deutschen Wiktionary: German pronunciation of ...

• nouns
• verbs
• flections of verbs
• adjectives
• adverbs
• conjunctions
• participles
• toponyms
• word combinations
• ...

(Kein Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit, insbesondere bei den Themen/Fachgebieten.) Wäre Dir das Recht? Keineswegs trennscharf (bis auf 3.), aber im Moment verträgt es schon noch ein paar mehr Gruppierungen. Jemand müsste die Gruppen aufmachen und in die bestehenden einsortieren. Ich würde meine Aussprachebeispiele ab sofort beim Hochladen pflegen. Dabei würde mindestens 3. immer als Gruppe hinzukommen. Aber was machen wir mit den bestehenden Aussprache-Beispielen, die sollten wohl auch einsortiert werden, oder? Das sind zu viele für Handarbeit.

Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 19:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Nicor,

ich habe gestern abend annähernd 1.200 Hörbsp. hochgeladen. Ich hatte nachmittags begonnen und nach der Zuordnung der 3. Kategorie aller Beispiele und dem versuchsweisen Zuordnen zu nur einem (!) Fachthema ("German pronunciation of medical and related terms") war der ganze Abend weg. Ganz ehrlich, das ist mir zuviel (Hand-)Arbeit. Kann das bei ernsthaftem Bedarf nicht über Bots weitgehend automatisiert werden? Viele der oben benannten Daten sind im deutschen Wiktionary bereits hinterlegt, wenn auch nicht durch Kategorisierung. Ich kann das, so leid es mir tut, zeitmäßig einfach nicht leisten, sorry. --Jeuwre (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Jeuwre,

das kann ich natürlich gut verstehen dass dir das alles etwas zu viel Aufwand bedeutet. Trotzdem vielen Dank für den Aufschlag. Wenn erst einmal ein Kategoriebaum dafür existiert, werden die einzelnen Dateien schon nach und nach dort hinein wandern. Ich würde sicherlich immer mal wieder welche dort einordnen. Sollte die bereits angelegte Kategorie allerdings nicht besser verschoben werden nach Category:German pronunciation of words relating to medicine, analog zu den bereits existierenden Kategorien in der Category:Pronunciation by subject? Es gibt auch bereits die Category:Pronunciation of words relating to medicine für alle Sprachen. Mit dem Tool cat-a-lot ginge das automatisch. Den gleichen Vorschlag würde ich auch für die Benennung deiner oben vorgeschlagenen Kategorien machen. Viele Grüße, --Nicor (talk) 21:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Nicor

>Sollte die bereits angelegte Kategorie allerdings nicht besser verschoben werden nach ...

gerne.

>Ich würde sicherlich immer mal wieder welche dort einordnen.

Das ist großartig bei den nicht mehr ganz wenig Beispielen .... Wenn Du Verzeichnisse deutscher Lemmata, von denen allerdings keineswegs jedes ein Hörbeispiel hat, benötigst mit Zuordnungen zu Fachgebieten, die findest Du im Deutschen Wiktionary hier.

>Mit dem Tool cat-a-lot ginge das automatisch. Den gleichen Vorschlag würde ich auch für die Benennung deiner oben vorgeschlagenen Kategorien machen.

Das wäre doch prima. Die Kategorien für die Einteilung nach Grammatik (nouns, verbs, ...) müsste noch erstellt werden. Dann wären zumindest die 1.200 schon mal einsortiert. Magst Du das machen?

Viele Grüße und danke für Deine Mühe --Jeuwre (talk) 05:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Rechtschreibfehler projezieren -> projizieren

Hi, ich vermute, dass sich bei der Datei File:De-projezieren.ogg ein Rechtschreibfehler eingeschlichen hat (und damit gewissermaßen auch ein Aussprachefehler): Im Duden ist "projezieren" nicht verzeichnet, "projizieren" wird anders ausgesprochen. Hab jetzt aber mal nichts verändert, nur als Info. Viele Grüße, --Jaquento (talk) 17:43, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jaquento, es ist ein, wie ich gerade hier gelernt habe, beliebter Rechtschreibfehler. Und, es ist auch richtig, dass es falsch gesprochen wurde. Ich werde einen Löschantrag für die Datei stellen. Einen schönen Abend und danke --Jeuwre (talk) 19:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Dir auch! Schade drum, ist eine schöne und saubere Aufnahme. --Jaquento (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jaquento, ich mach' 'ne neue, ist doch klar. --Jeuwre (talk) 19:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Audio Files to be updated

De-Spielzeug.ogg and De-erzielte.ogg ought to be updated, alongside De-Kind.ogg. --96.19.166.85 03:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

That notification is from me (I forgot to log in). Now, for the following entries in need of audio files:

• Nachtigall

• südwärts
• westwärts
• nordwärts
• ostwärts
• Morphem
• barfuß
• fürbass
• fürder
• Reise
• Schlafmütze
• Schlafraum
• Schlafkammer
• Schlafsaal
• Schlafstube
• Gleitlaut
• Lesezeichen
• Lautzeichen
• Vokalzeichen
• Wortzeichen
• Leerzeichen
• Zahlzeichen
• Absatzzeichen

Thank you for taking the time to read this. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 03:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Lo Ximiendo,

Rectifications:

De-Spielzeug.ogg and De-Kind.ogg are imho fine pronunciations, especially because the first one is spoken by a child (the subject of 'Spielzeug' is a childish one). I suppose to produce De-Spielzeug2.ogg and De-Kind2.ogg attaching a figure as I do, when an existing example could be improved, but isn't as bad it should be erased. Or more simple, when there are two pronunciation possibilities in fact. O.k., I won't pronounce it quite differently, but sound quality isn't here the best.

De-erzielte.oga needs urgent improvement, I agree, new upload follows.

Of course I'm willing to support you with the other words. I ask only for some patience, because I'm able to record, cut and upload in a week at the earliest.

Have a nice day --Jeuwre (talk) 17:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Now I have found, that Datei:De-Kennzeichen.ogg needs an update alongside your other files that had been uploaded in the year 2014. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 08:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

But you agree, that not only my files don't meet your standards? I suppose, you compile a list of the inappropriate audio examples (except my one's from middle 2014 of course). Then it's possibel to discuss the list. --Jeuwre (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

The audio files you mentioned are uploaded/updated. --Jeuwre (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:De-Dermatolge.ogg

File:De-Dermatolge.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeuwre (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Schnelllöschungen etc.

Hallo Jens,

für Fälle wie eins weiter oben braucht es eigentlich kein offizielles Löschverfahren, das wäre ein Schnelllöschkandidat nach Commons:Löschrichtlinien#Schnelllöschverfahren. Also einfach die Vorlage "speedydelete" auf die Seite setzen.

Gruß Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 12:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

File:De-Gevelsberg.ogg

Hallo Jeuwre, beim Ortsnamen Gevelsberg wird das v wie f gesprochen. Die Betonung der Silben klingt sonst richtig. Kannst du das viell. neu aufnehmen? Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 12:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Jeuwre, wahrscheinlich hast du diese Nachricht übersehen… kannst du dir das noch Mal angucken? Holger1959 (talk) 22:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Holger1959, Danke für Deinen erneuten Hinweis, bei nächster Gelegenheit ändere ich es, dauert aber ein/zwei Wochen. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 04:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Holger1959, hab's neu eingesprochen. Allerdings habe ich durch Zufall gestern in den Verkehrsnachrichten meine ursprüngliche Aussprache gehört. Leider sagt das Aussprachewörterbuch De Gryter nichts dazu. Allerdings folgen alle ähnlich geschriebenen Orte meiner ersten Aussprache und dem Hörfunksprecher gestern: Grevelingen, Grevenbroich, Grevesmühlen, d.h. phonetisch alle mit IPA: [v] (wie in Winter /[ˈvɪntɐ]/, Vase /[ˈvaːzə]/, etc.). Kannst Du Deinen Aussprachevorschlag irgendwie belegen? Möglichkeiten wären: A) anderes Aussprachewörterbuch, B) Beispiel in nachvollziehbarem (= Internet/Youtube) Rundfunk-/Fernsehbeitrag, in dem der Ort ausgesprochen wird. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 07:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Ich konnte es nicht lassen und habe selber recherchiert:

Die sprechen eindeutig IPA [v]:

1. http://www1.wdr.de/mediathek/video/sendungen/lokalzeit-dortmund/video-irish-folk-aus-gevelsberg-100.html

2.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRBDimeR8ag

Sie spricht eindeutig IPA [f]:

3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlEPZcLMe_Q.

Es scheint, als ob beide Varianten üblich/möglich sind. Was sagst Du?

Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 08:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Jeuwre, danke, klingt jetzt korrekt! Mit Aussprachewörterbüchern kann ich nicht dienen, aber du kannst das gut hören zB bei [1] (Gevelsberger Bürgermeister Jacobi, mehrfach am Anfang) oder auch bei radioenneperuhr.de (Lokalradio, wenns denn Gevelsberger Nachrichten gibt). Vor Ort in Gevelsberg wird der Stadtname halt mit f ausgesprochen, nur Zugereiste/Ortsfremde (wie zB Leute vom WDR) sprechens manchmal anders aus. Der Unterschied v/f ist natürlich nicht so riesig, das fällt weniger auf als beim benachbarten Bochum, wo man sich über die "falsche" Aussprache mit kurzem o ärgert (und da gibts auch noch ein Laer, das sich anders ausspricht als Laer). Bei Ortsnamen kommts glaub ich immer drauf an woher jemand kommt und "möglich" sind wohl öfters mehrere Aussprachen. Hab aber leider keinen Überblick der Regeln, was für Wikipedia/Wiktionary als "richtig" gilt. Bei echten Dialekten ist die Trennung sicher einfacher (zB. Konschdanz/Konstanz), da stellt sich die Frage falsch/richtig nicht so. Da fällt mir ein, Gereon_K. kann die Aussprache sicher auch bestätigen. Holger1959 (talk) 09:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Ich wohne ca. 2 Kilometer von der Gevelsberger Stadtgrenze entfernt und habe schon beides gehört. Ich selber spreche es Gewelsberg aus und nicht Gefelsberg. Ich würde mich in diesem Fall aber an Wolfgang Jacobi orientieren, also Aussprache wie 'f'. Bei Radio EN sprechen nicht nur Gevelsberger, sondern hauptsächlich Hagener und Ennepetaler. --Gereon K. (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Holger1959, hallo Gereon K., danke für die Infos. Ich lasse die Aussprache, wie sie jetzt besteht. Der Bürgermeister Jacobi sollte wissen, wie seine Stadt gesprochen wird. Was ich noch mache: Ich kopiere diesen Beitrag hier bei Gelegenheit in die Diskussion von [2], damit dort jeder nachvollziehen kann, was hier an Erkenntnissen benannt wurde. Wenn dort jemand unbedingt der Meinung ist, das entspräche nicht der Wirklichkeit, dann kann er ggf. Belege dafür bringen. Viele Grüße und danke noch einmal --Jeuwre (talk) 13:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Den Gevelsbergern ist das, glaube ich, ziemlich egal. Wo der Unterschied eine große Rolle spielt ist jedoch die Stadt de:Halver. Dort wird das ernster genommen. --Gereon K. (talk) 18:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

@Gereon K.: sag das nicht, von der Süßspeise kenn ich das auch, aber viele Gevelsberger nehmen das nicht weniger ernst. Eigentlich alles harmlos, wirklich schlimm mit dem v/f ists glaub ich nur beim Bier. Holger1959 (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

@Gereon K.: , @Holger1959: Na, das sehen die Bewohner möglicherweise doch nicht ganz so eng: ["Duden-online: Jever"], so ist's auch im deutschen wiktionary abgebildet (aber noch nicht eingesprochen); IPA: [ˈjeːfɐ], [ˈjeːvɐ]. Auch De Gruyter zeigt beide Möglichkeiten. --Jeuwre (talk) 20:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

gut, daß wir das hier nicht so verbissen sehen. ging mir ja nur um die vor Ort übliche Aussprache. Auch Bochum hört man ab und zu mit mehr oder wneiger kurzem u, trotzdem wird die übliche Aussprache mit langem u angegeben. Und ich bins eh gewohnt, mir ständig Witze übers Wetter anzuhören und finds nicht schlimm. "Richtigkeit" ist bei Ortsnamen eh relativ und bei bedarf lassen sich ja überall die Varianten benennen, wie bei Jever. Holger1959 (talk) 20:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Jeuwre, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Aussprache “Schulen”

Hallo, ein Audiobeispiel von dir wurde auf enwikt gerade als mit "needs attention" markiert [diff]. Das Beispiel klingt nicht nach "Schulen" (eher Schuwen). – Jberkel (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Jberkel, die Aussprache ist sicher nicht perfekt. Bei Gelegenheit werde ich es überarbeiten oder ein neues hochladen. Danke für den Hinweis. --Jeuwre (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

"schiefgehen"

Hello Jeuwre. I'm English, so this may be nonsense, but I am very puzzled by the pronunciation example for 'schiefgehen'. To me it sounds like 'scheifgehen'. The IPA pronunciation listed looks what I would expect. There is another sound file lower down the page, in a different voice, for a phrase including 'schiefgehen', which sounds as I would expect. Could you please check - at least the two sound files should use the same pronunciation. Thanks. Peter Kenny — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.198.171.242 (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Addendum: There is a weird inconsistency in the pronunciation you can get for this word. To hear the one that worries me, go to the Wiktionary page for 'schiefgehen' and click on the word in the pronunciation example. If you click on the 'info' link, you get a page about the file 'De-schiefgehen.ogg', which can give you two different pronunciations; click on the 'play' button and it comes out correct, click on the name 'De-schiefgehen.ogg' and you get the one I am questioning. By the way, I was wrong about the example for 'wird schon schiefgehen', which is clearly also in your voice - sorry. Peter Kenny. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.198.171.242 (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Peter Kenny,

you're right, I uploaded De-schiefgehen.ogg [File:De-schiefgehen.ogg]).

> To hear the one that worries me, go to the Wiktionary page for 'schiefgehen'

I'm sorry to say that I can't see your point. I think you consider the usage on German Wiktionary ([3]). If I click on the sound-buttons there or on commons ([4]), I cannot hear any difference. And that's what I'd expect because the source for all Wiktionaries is usually Commons. Listening again very carefully to the pronunciation (no matter where) it sounds correctly.

Anyway, years ago I had a similar problem. Please empty your cache in your browser and see if it changes the pronunciation. In my case it solved the issue. Hope that helps. --Jeuwre (talk) 08:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jeuwre. It gets more mysterious. I have emptied my browser cache, but it still sounds exactly the same. However, I think you are right that it is some sort of cache effect. I tried on another machine, which I had never previously used to consult Wiktionary, and it all sounds correct whichever button I select. So I can leave you in peace, being sure that everything is OK. My only question, for myself, is how to persuade Firefox on my main machine to forget the erroneous version.

Peter Kenny — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.198.171.242 (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Peter.

> My only question, for myself, is how to persuade Firefox on my main machine to forget the erroneous version.

Cache erasing helped in my case. Unfortunately I've no idea what else you can do in yours except for changing your browser (not seriously: Firefox is quite o.k.) or reinstalling Firefox. Sorry.

--Jeuwre (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Weird issue with chain of audio files uploaded in the wrong name

Hi Jeuwre! First of all, thanks for all your work!

I came upon a weird chain of audio files that you uploaded with the wrong names. File:De-Vorstellung.ogg -> File:De-Abelmoschus.ogg -> File:De-Dauerware.ogg -> File:De-Kapernsoße.ogg -> File:De-Leckmuschel.ogg -> ... The list goes on. It might not even begin at "Vorstellung".

Just wanted to let you know :) Wyverald (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

I did a bit more digging and apparently a sequence of files you uploaded on 10 July, 2017 had this problem. You can see it on this page; the "error chain" starts from "Elektrik" and ends at "Nahrungsmittelversorgung". Wyverald (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Wyverald, thank you very much for your information and sorting out the problem. I think, the best way to solve the issue is to cancel the links of the 21 audio files to wiktionaries, rename the audio files and to mend a correct link of the renamed files. Will do it soon. Regards --Jeuwre (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Issue solved, thanks to CAPTAIN RAJU. Regards --Jeuwre (talk) 17:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

File:De-Elektrik.ogg

File:De-Elektrik.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alexander Gamauf (talk) 22:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Falscher Inhalt in Audiodatei

Hallo,

in der Datei des Aussprachebeispiels unter https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Must-have wird das Wort Müßiggang gesprochen. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.59.241.13 (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Blanking pages

Please do never ever blank any pages like you did here. Such doing does not help solving "problems" but inflicts new ones. Existing improper redirects can be changed or their deletion can be requested instead. sy --Jotzet (talk) 18:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jotzet, thank you for your solid objection

>Such doing does not help solving "problems"

The removal helps to prevent the problem of further false connections to other wiktionaries, as it happened to five or six wiktionaries and wikidata. A false connection, that is in my point of view a problem. So I'd serious reason to delink.

>Existing improper redirects can be changed

You're right. I didn't had the notion to redirect to , which would be now (!, the file is produced a few days ago) a proper one. I did it just a minute ago.

>deletion can be requested

That's not an option here. cu --Jeuwre (talk) 07:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Etc.)

Hello. Please stop adding categories with meaningless names like Category:Etc.) ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Gießen

nun ist es kein Toponym in Hessen mehr? ...Sicherlich ^talk 14:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)]]

Hallo Sicherlich, nun, Homophone werden, zumindest in der deutschen Wiktionary, getrennt eingesprochen. Damit haben wir dann De-Gießen.ogg und De-gießen.ogg. In der Kleinschreibung ist gießen (nur) das wässern einer Pflanze und nur in der Großschreibung ein Toponym Hessens. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Nun, mit Blick auf die Versionsgeschichte ist das Wort in der Großschreibung "eingesprochen" wurden. Mir war auch gar nicht bewusst, dass sich Gießen anders spricht als gießen .oO ... mir scheint das doch eher einem unsinnigen "Ordnungssinn" geschuldet. Es geht um die "Aussprache" - aber soll ich die Datei nochmal in Großschreibung hochladen? Damit es hübsch ausschaut? ...Sicherlich ^talk 18:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

ping Sicherlich

>mit Blick auf die Versionsgeschichte ist das Wort in der Großschreibung "eingesprochen" wurden

Muss ich mir die Versiongeschichte angucken, um zu wissen, wofür etwas eingesprochen wurde?

>mir scheint das doch eher einem unsinnigen "Ordnungssinn" geschuldet. Es geht um die "Aussprache"

Geht es nicht nur. Wir reden ja nicht nur über das deutsche Wiktionary, sondern über alle Wikis der Wikipedia-Gemeinschaft. Wie soll die jeweilige Datei aus Commons dahin verlinkt werden mit Hilfe von Bots, wenn nicht über korrekte Rechtschreibung? Wie kann ein Nichtmuttersprachler auch bei händischer Verknüpfung sicher sein, dass es identisch ausgesprochen wird? Wir haben für Hörbeispiele (leider) keine Organisation in Datenbanken, dann wären Dein Gedanke und damit Homophone leicht abbildbar.

> aber soll ich die Datei nochmal in Großschreibung hochladen?

• könntest Du nicht, weil commons auf identische Dateiinhalte achtet, Du müsstest es neu einsprechen und das könntest Du hochladen
• schon geschehen:
• nebenbei: die Lautschrift im deutschen Wiktionary ist /ˈɡiːsn̩/ und nicht /ˈɡiːsən/, wie es auch im Duden online eingesprochen und bei Krech/Stock transkribiert ist. Wie gesagt, nebenbei.

--Jeuwre (talk) 03:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Wenn Du wissen willst wofür es eingesprochen wurde musst Du entweder den Sprecher fragen oder in die Versionsgeschichte befragen. Ja. Denn ob der Sprecher "Gießen" oder "gießen" sagt kannst Du ja kaum hören.

Neu hochladen: Du veralberst mich oder? Zum einen wurde die Datei, aus welchen Gründen auch immer, in die Endung .oga umgetauft, es gäbe diesen Konflikt also nicht und zum anderen könnte man sie durchaus auch De-Gießen-2.ogg o.ä. nennen - oder ist das im Wiktionary (ups, mer san auf Commons!?) nicht üblich? Es darf nur eine geben und fertig?

Lautschrift: nix dagegen, was hat das mit der Datei zu tun? Ist die Aussprache nicht normgerecht? Dann nenn es regionale Färbung und freu Dich über die Vielfalt?! ...Sicherlich ^talk 07:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

hmm - Du bist sowohl der Urheber von De-Gießen.ogg also auch De-feinporig.ogg - ich bezweifle, dass der "Aufnehmer" (der Du vielleicht bist!?) der Urheber ist. Bei einem Lied ist ja auch nicht der Mensch im Tonstudio "Aufnahme" drückt der Urheber. ...Sicherlich ^talk 08:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Ordnungssinn (hat ich glatt überlesen) - "Wie kann ein Nichtmuttersprachler ... sicher sein, dass es identisch ausgesprochen wird?" - man müsste also einen Hinweis an der Datei anbringen. Irgendwie ein Text der das erläutert 🤔 ... OH! Man könnte es in die Dateibeschreibung setzen! .oO (Falls das Gefühl kommt ich mache mich lustig: ja. Denn ich fühle mich verschaukelt. Das von Dir genannte "Problem" ist genausowenig eins wie das mit der Großschreibung. - und bzgl. Bots: wenn das Werkzeug mit dem Material nicht umgehen kann: verbessere das Werkzeug. ... davon abgesehen ist das Problem wohl eher marginal und im zweifel wie Großschreibung und Dateitext ein eingebildetes ...Sicherlich ^talk 08:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

ping Sicherlich

>davon abgesehen ist das Problem wohl eher marginal

Bei einem marginalen Problem bräuchten wir doch gar nicht zu diskutieren, oder? Das nehme ich Dir nicht ab. Die "Benamung" von Aussprachebeispielen ist für das deutsche Wiktionary jedenfalls ein Thema, Du findest eine Beschreibung dazu hier: Hilfe Hörbeispiele - Namenskonventionen. Diese Hilfe ist abgestimmt mit den dort Aktiven und gilt auch für Dich. --Jeuwre (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

P.S.: Man kann natürlich mehrere Aussprachevarianten hochladen und diese De-...2.ogg, De-...3.ogg, etc. nennen. --Jeuwre (talk) 08:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Das marignal bezog sich auf bot-verlinkungen und wurde von Dir ins spiel gebracht. Ist also nichts was Du mir abnehmen musst!?!

die Regeln Wiktionarys gelten wohl kaum für Commons (auch die des deutschen nicht). Von daher ist es irrelevant und zu dem hier genannten "Problem" der Kategorisierung steht nichtmal was dazu und das Wörtchen sollte deutet darüberhinaus nicht auf eine Pflicht. Also: rundum nicht zutreffend ...Sicherlich ^talk 10:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

ping Sicherlich

>die Regeln Wiktionarys gelten wohl kaum für Commons

Du kannst hier hochladen, was Du willst, mir persönlich ist das gleich (anderen Commons-Usern/Admins wahrscheinlich schon nicht mehr). Die Verlinkung ins deutsche Wiktionary, die interssiert mich. Da gibt es Regeln, an die Du Dich zu halten hast, auch wenn die Datei auf Commons geladen wurde. Ist doch ganz einfach. Zurück zum Ursprung dieses Austausches: nun ist es kein Toponym in Hessen mehr? Da ich selber derjenige war, der die Category:German pronunciation of toponyms of Hesse mal erzeugt habe (wie vieler anderer Kategorien auch), erlaube ich mir, dort die deutschen Rechtschreibregeln anzuwenden. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, damit in Übereinstimmung mit den Admins auf Commons zu handeln, schließlich habe ich schon einige meiner von mir selber produzierten Hörbeispiele wegen Rechtschreibfehlern umbenennen lassen. Jeder, der die Kategorie aufmacht, muss sich nicht verwirren lassen von einer falschen Rechtschreibung und sich fragen, was ein Verb in dieser Kategorie zu suchen hat. Deshalb bitte ich Dich, Dein Undo meines Edits auf De-gießen.oga wieder herauszunehmen. Gerne kannst Du alternativ, wenn es Dir wichtig ist und Dein Hörbeispiel für die Stadt gelten soll, für dieses einen Rename-Antrag stellen, z.B. De-Gießen2.oga oder so ähnlich. Ich wünsche Dir einen schönen Tag --Jeuwre (talk) 10:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Ich habe nichts ins Wiktionary verlinkt und das auch nicht vor.

Das Du eine Kat auf Commons angelegt hast macht Dich nicht zum Eigentümer.

Ich bin mir auch ziemlich sicher, dass ich "in Übereinstimmung mit den Admins auf Commons" - und noch viel mehr mit den Richtlinien von Commons. Die sind nämlich das relevante. Gegen keine der selbigen wurde verstoßen.

Rename wäre nicht sinnvoll: wenn dann, wie ich ja oben schon schrieb, dann nochmals hochladen. Damit beide dasind; damits hübsch aussieht .oO ...Sicherlich ^talk 12:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

ping Sicherlich

>Das Du eine Kat auf Commons angelegt hast macht Dich nicht zum Eigentümer.

Habe ich nie behauptet. Ich wollte nur sagen, dass ich mir beim Anlegen der Kategorie Gedanken gemacht habe darüber, was da wohl reingehört. Und zu meinen Gedanken gehörte auch: keine Rechtschreibfehler (was eine Selbstverständlichkeit sein sollte).

>Rename wäre nicht sinnvoll, [...]

Beim Rename-Antrag ist die Begründung 3: Missspelling, siehe Help:Rename. Also auch Commons sieht die Beseitigung von Rechtschreibfehlern vor. Wenn Du darauf bestehst, dass dein Hörbeispiel in der Kategorie bleibt, dann ist das ein klarer Rechtschreibfehler. Wenn ich den Rename-Antrag stellte, dann würde das die Begründung werden. --Jeuwre (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

rein gehören offensichtich Dateien zur Aussprache von Toponymen. Das ist gegeben. Ein Rechtschreibfehler liegt nicht vor: zur selben aussprache gehören nunmal zwei Schreibweisen. Doof für die Schönheit, ist aber so. Für die Schönheit solche Dateien doppelt hochzuladen ist wohl nicht vorgesehen, weil es wohl eher in Richtung absurd geht. Ein Rename-Antrag von Dir wird also nicht erfolgreich sein. Aber Du kannst es ja probieren. Speziell die Datei wurde für die Optik schon so oft hin und hergeschoben; da machen ein paar mehr Verschiebungen keinen Unterschied. Form über Inhalt; nunja ...Sicherlich ^talk 13:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:De-Gießen.ogg

Magst Du Dich noch zur oben angesprochenen Urheberrechtsproblematik äußern oder stell ich einfach einen URV-Antrag und gucke was passiert? ...Sicherlich ^talk 15:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

ping user:Sicherlich Entschuldige, mir ist nicht klar, worauf Du mit dem Thema Urheberrechtsverletzung hinaus willst. Das scheint mir so abwegig, aber vielleicht verstehe ich Dich ja nur nicht. --Jeuwre (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

es ist eine weibliche Stimme zu hören: die ist der Urheber - ich gehe davon aus, dass du männlich bist!? (alternativ sind andere Dateien betroffen) - entsprechend kannst Du nicht der Autor sein, wie in der Dateibeschreibung behauptet ...Sicherlich ^talk 15:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

ping user:Sicherlich O.k., jetzt verstehe ich. Das hat meine Tochter auf meine Bitte netterweise eingesprochen. Da sich die Urheberschaft ja nur zum kleinen Teil auf die Einsprache selber bezieht, sondern dazu auch schneiden, bearbeiten, konvertieren gehören, habe ich wenig Verständnis für diese Diskussion. Die Beschreibung passt auch. Das ganze ist natürlich auch mit ihrem Einverständnis geschehen. Sie hat nur Null Interesse daran, hier einen Account zu eröffnen. Aber bitte, wenn Du das Urheberthema triggern willst: nur zu und viel Spaß --Jeuwre (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Klar, wo Du mich drauf gestoßen hast mach ich das doch glatt ...Sicherlich ^talk 15:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Jeuwre, vielen Dank an deine Tochter und dich für die Hörbeispiele. Könntest du deine Tochter vielleicht einmal Kontakt zu unserem OTRS-Team aufnehmen lassen? Damit ist das ganze dann Commons-bürokratisch korrekt geklärt und sollte zukünftig keine Probleme mehr bescheren. Eventuell reicht das Mitschicken von File:Einsprachen Jeuwre-Tochter 2015ff.ogg. Danke! Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:59, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

File:De-Gießen.ogg

File:De-Gießen.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The uploader (User:Jeuwre) is not the person speaking so not the autor. Its obvious as Jeuwre is male, the voice female ...Sicherlich talk 15:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Sicherlich ^talk 15:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

File:De-Gießen.ogg

File:De-Gießen.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Du erhältst einen Orden!

	Der Fleißorden
	Vielen Dank für Deine vielen Hörbeispiele von hervorragender Klangqualität. Peter Gröbner (talk) 08:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your uploads,

Hi, please check your uploads, so that other users do not need to do this kind of fixes. Jcb (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

We all make mistakes sometimes. Your hard work is appreciated. Charlesmartin82 (talk) 09:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jcb, hi Charlesmartin82, I think most of the users don't screw up on purpose. I definitely try to do my best to avoid mistakes. Unfortunately sometimes something unwanted pass unnoticed. Not really surprising if you upload 3,000 files a week which all are made manually. Anyway that's no excuse for my mistakes. I'd like to say "Thank you" to both of you for revising my nonsense and acknowledging my contributions. --Jeuwre (talk) 09:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Eichsfeld

Deine Aussprache des Sprachbeispiels für das Eichsfeld ist nicht ganz korrekt. Ein Aussprachebeispiel findest Du im Artikel Eichsfeld. Auch wenn die Wortherkunft des Landstriches von der "Eiche" abgeleitet sein könnte, wird das "ch" als "k" ausgesprochen, ich bin aber kein Sprachwissenschaftler (genaue Verwendung der Lautschriftzeichen) und kenne auch nicht die Regelungen für deren Anwendung der Sprachbeispiele hier auf WP. Ich kenne keinen Eichsfelder, egal ob mundsprachlicher Herkunft oder mit hochdeutscher Sprache (und die sind inzwischen in der Mehrheit), der das "ch" gebraucht.--79.214er (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Hallo 79.214er, danke für Deinen Hinweis. Nach Recherche kann ich bestätigen, dass Du Recht hast. Ich habe das Aussprachebeispiel und die Ableitungen (Eichsfelds, Eichsfelder, Eichsfelderin, etc.) daraufhin korrigiert. --Jeuwre (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Danke für die Korrektur.--79.214er (talk) 08:11, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Ösophagi

Hi, warum sprichst du das øzoˈfaːɡʊs und øzoˈfaːɡi aus, wo doch in wikt:Ösophagi und wikt:Ösophagi ganz klar øˈzoːfaɡʊs und øˈzoːfaɡi steht? Meines Wissens (und auch laut Duden-Aussprachewörterbuch) sind Betonung und Länge auf der zweiten Silbe, nicht auf der Dritten (anders beim Adjektiv). --FordPrefect42 (talk) 22:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Hallo FordPrefect42, wahrscheinlich habe ich mich von der Adjektiv-Aussprache leiten lassen. Korrigiere ich. Gruß --Jeuwre (talk) 06:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

@FordPrefect42:

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jeuwre/archive,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

File:De-Sterbejahrs.ogg

File:De-Sterbejahrs.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:4898:80E8:B:9DC4:6216:8614:95FE 03:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Jeuwre, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films?. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 08:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

File:De-Eimsbüttel.ogg

Hi Jeuwre - bin auf deine Hörbeispiele gestoßen. Vielen Dank für die vielen, vielen Beiträge. Du hast eine sehr geeignete Stimme. Bei den Hörbeispielen zu den Stadteilen Hamburgs fällt mir auf, dass die zweite Silbe betont wird, so z.B. EimsBÜTTEL. Ein Hamburger würde aber EIMSbüttel sagen, denn Büttel gibt's ja viele. Man spricht ja auch nicht von ReinickenDORF. Möchtest Du, dass ich versuche, herauszufinden, was in dieser Hinsicht "richtig" ist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borishamburger (talk • contribs) 15:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Borishamburger,

>Möchtest Du, dass ich versuche, herauszufinden, was in dieser Hinsicht "richtig" ist?

Gerne. Vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützung. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 16:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Krech/Stock/Hirschfeld sagen im "Deutschen Ausprachwörterbuch" nichts dazu. Also habe ich Beispiele herausgesucht:

Diese Beispiele betonen auf der 1. Silbe:

• Treffpunkt Hamburg - Eimsbüttel vor der Bezirkswahl am Sonntag nach 00:34 mm:ss
• Realer Irrsinn: Illegales Blumenbeet in Hamburg - extra 3 - NDR nach 00:13 mm:ss
• Realer Irrsinn: Hamburger Hundezaun - extra 3 - NDR nach 00:10 mm:ss
• Der Bezirk Eimsbüttel braucht eine Alternative nach 00:27 mm:ss
• NDR zeigt das Karussell in Hamburg Eimsbüttel nach 00:06 mm:ss

Dieses Beispiel betont auf der 2. Silbe:

• Stadtteilanalyse Hamburg - Eimsbüttel nach 00:02 mm:ss

Es gibt noch ein Beispiel, da ist die Betonung auf erster und zweiter Silbe, das habe ich weggelassen.

Es scheint, Eimsbüttel wird auf der ersten Silbe betont. Ich ändere es, dauert aber ein bisschen. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 18:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

File:De-aufzeichnen.ogg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

File:De-Saarlouiser.ogg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 10:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Files from 22 December 2019 have sound in the left channel only

Hallo! It seems that the audio files you recorded on 22 December 2019 have sound in the left channel only. File:De-Importgenehmigung.ogg through File:De-scheinst wider.ogg are affected (with files before File:De-immunstes.ogg or after File:De-Naturen2.ogg not affected). There are 4573 affected files (wow): [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]. I am not sure how to fix that many files, but I think they just need the silent right channel removed; if you have them saved locally there probably is a way to automate it. --Pokechu22 (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Pokechu22, thank you for your information. I'm quite baffled, because I usually record pronunciation files (with Audacity) in mono sound quality. But you're right, I hear only the left channel too. At the moment I don't know what we can do: It would be quite troublesome to reupload/overwrite all affected files manually and would last days to complete. Do you have a notion, what we can do to overwrite with the help of software? Additionally I have to record the files again, because when I speak in front of the microphone I do it in a (more or less) random order. I only sort the files for upload when using vicuna-uploader. Therefore a new recording would be needed, that's for the amount of affected files maybe the work of a week. --Jeuwre (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I've an idea, how I can create the files on my computer: the command 'sox "De-scheinst wider.ogg" "De-scheinst wider_new.ogg" remix 1,2' produces a mono file. I could edit a bash script including a loop over the affected filenames with the just mentioned command and I'll get it. One week of work saved up. But how can I overwrite/upload again the files on commons in a simple way? --Jeuwre (talk) 11:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Upload tools and particularly Commons:Command-line upload might help; it should be possible to upload replacing the existing file that way from the same bash script. I have never used anything but the regular upload tool, though. --Pokechu22 (talk) 23:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello Pokechu22, upload is in progress, Upload.py is the tool, that helped me. Thanks for your proposals! --Jeuwre (talk) 13:11, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 08:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Deine Tondatei Schweinfurt

Hallo Jeuwre, könntest du diese Tondatei in den Anfang der Einleitung des WP-Artikels Schweinfurt einfügen. Ich hab das nicht fertig gebracht. Grüße--Kim117 (talk) 10:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Kim117,  Done. Ich hab es jetzt so eingefügt, wie die Hörbsp. bei Hamburg, Berlin, u.a., eingebaut sind. Man könnte es auch machen, wie beispielsweise in Skagen (ohne IPA und 'direkt'). Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 16:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! --Kim117 (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

PS: Gerade bemerkte ich, dass der Ton nicht klappt.--Kim117 (talk) 20:45, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

@Kim117, Korrektur:  Done. Ich bin selber überrascht, dass die deutsche Wikipedia nicht existente Audiodateien (bzw. hier: falsch geschriebene) ohne irgend einen Hinweis zulässt. Da ist die englische Wikipedia weiter: die weist darauf hin, wenn man Mist verknüpfen will (wie ich in diesem Fall in der deutschen Wikipedia). Das die deutsche Wikipdia da hinterherhinkt (und sogar einen Blaulink anzeigt(!), was dann wirklich Käse ist) habe ich gerade erst gelernt. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 20:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Das ist eben das Wesen der digitalen Welt in heutiger Präsentation. Da lernt man nie aus und das geht wohl ewig so weiter. Viele Grüße --Kim117 (talk) 21:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Your work in audio recording is amazingly helpful to German Wiktionary—you have done excellent work and much of it! NovumChase (talk) 06:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@NovumChase, Thank you very much, you are very kind. --Jeuwre (talk) 06:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

let's made it twice :). Thanks a lot. Kind regards.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 07:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Pierpao, thanks a lot, you're very nice! --Jeuwre (talk) 08:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

File:De-Pausa.ogg

Hallo Jeuwre,

Du hast die Datei File:De-Pausa.ogg hochgeladen. Wenn man diese anhört, ist das aber nicht die Aussprache von "Pausa", wie es die Beschreibung sagt. Da ist eher etwas zu hören wie "Paus durch" oder "Paus dorch". Kannst Du das bitte nochmal überprüfen und korrigieren.

Vielen Dank und Viele Grüße N8eule78 (talk) 06:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo N8eule78, Du hast vollkommen Recht, hier ist mir ein Fehler passiert, danke für den Hinweis. Ich korrigiere es so bald wie möglich. Viele Grüße und 'Danke' nochmal --Jeuwre (talk) 07:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo N8eule78, ich habe ein neues Hörbeispiel hochgeladen.  Done --Jeuwre (talk) 13:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo nochmal,

Vielen Dank für die Korrektur!

Viele Grüße N8eule78 (talk) 20:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

File:De-Möckmühl.ogg

Hallo Jeuwre,

danke für die Datei. Du sprichst den Namen der Stadt aber leider falsch aus, denn die Betonung liegt auf der zweiten Silbe, nicht wie von dir gesprochen auf der ersten. Ein paar Beispiele von Youtube, damit du mir das nicht unbesehen glauben musst: [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].

Kannst du bitte eine korrigierte Version der Datei hochladen, bevor sich die falsche Aussprache durch Verlinkung auf Wiktionary oder sonstwo fesetzt? Das wäre schön. Ich lösche hinterher auch gerne die Version mit der falschen Aussprache, wenn du mir Bescheid gibst. Danke. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 12:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Rosenzweig, vielen Dank für Deine Aufmerksamkeit! Das der Ort auf der zweiten Silbe betont sein könnte, darauf bin ich nicht gekommen. Ich habe es neu eingesprochen und gerade hochgeladen:  Done Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Hier noch eine Anregung für einen weiteren Ortsnamen aus Baden-Württemberg, die öfters falsch ausgesprochen wird: de:Owen - wird korrekt als "Auen" ausgesprochen.

Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 14:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Rosenzweig, vielen Dank für das Mitdenken. Bist Du Hellseher? Ich hab Owen gestern eingesprochen, auf Wiktionary steht die IPA: /ˈaʊ̯ən/, siehe hier, da war es leicht. Nächste Woche wird es (zusammen mit einigen anderen Einsprachen) hochgeladen. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

File:De-Volontäre.ogg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Parvenu.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-Parvenu.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Parvenu.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Großwechsungen

Hallo Jeuwre, ich wollte mal fragen ob du ein Aussprachebeispiel für den Ort Großwechsungen anfertigen könntest. Hin und wieder hört man (Radio, TV) die lokal völlig unübliche Aussprache mit "ch". Tatsächlich ist es aber als "weksungen" mit "k" in Nordthüringen bekannt (wie beim oben diskutierten Eichsfeld). Eventuell werden die "Falschsprecher" dann weniger ;). Eventuell könntest du den Ortsnamen noch in IPA Zeichen darstellen, mit dem Thema bin ich nicht vertraut. Ich würde mich sehr freuen. Beste Grüße Jonas aus Großwechsungen2 (talk) 19:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Jonas aus Großwechsungen2, gerne: ich spreche es morgen ein, der Upload kommt Mo. oder Di. nächster Woche. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 20:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Bemühungen! Eventuell könntest du für das Nachbardorf "Kleinwechsungen" ebenfalls etwas einsprechen. Das wäre super! Schönen Sonntag noch. Gruß Jonas aus Großwechsungen2 (talk) 15:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Jonas aus Großwechsungen2,  Done, siehe und . Die IPAs findest Du in der jeweiligen Dateibeschreibung (hier auf commons). Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 12:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Nochmals vielen Dank für die schnelle und ausführliche Hilfe! Gruß. Jonas aus Großwechsungen2 (talk) 15:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Jonas aus Großwechsungen2, es wäre in meinen Augen hilfreich, wenn die beiden Dateien, vielleicht zuerst mal nur in der deutschen Wikipedia in Großwechsungen und Kleinwechsungen, verknüpft würden. Hier auf commons nützen sie ja nicht so viel. Wie das Verknüpfen funktioniert, habe ich oben im Talk Deine_Tondatei_Schweinfurt anhand von Beispielen angedeutet. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 15:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Du reagierst aber schnell, fast auf die Minute gleich. Zwei Seelen, ein Gedanke ... :-). Herzliche Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 15:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Du hast es ja sofort gesehen :D Wollte gerade schreiben "fertig" :) Ich hoffe es stimmt so alles ;) Jonas aus Großwechsungen2 (talk) 15:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jonas aus Großwechsungen2, Perfekt. --Jeuwre (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-am überraschtesten.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-am überraschtesten.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-am überraschtesten.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-am überraschensten.oga

Copyright status: File:De-am überraschensten.oga

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-am überraschensten.oga. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Iserv Screenshot 20210114 120501.png

File:Iserv Screenshot 20210114 120501.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FelixGermany (talk) 23:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

File:IServ start website Screenshot-20210114 084800CET.png

File:IServ start website Screenshot-20210114 084800CET.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from the website https://iserv.eu whose content is not under a free license, see Commons:Screenshots. source=https://iserv.eu Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2A01:C22:907A:3F00:B670:FF78:A516:1FC0.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Defizite.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-Defizite.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Defizite.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:De-Handelsbilanzdefizits.ogg
• File:De-Handelsbilanzdefizite.ogg
• File:De-Defizites.ogg
• File:De-Handelsbilanzdefiziten.ogg
• File:De-Defiziten.ogg
• File:De-Defizits.ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

File:De-Rienz.ogg

Danke für das Hochladen, aber als Südtiroler ist mir aufgefallen, dass der Flussname so nicht korrekt ausgesprochen ist. Die Betonung müsste nämlich auf der ersten Silbe liegen, wie ja auch aus der IPA-Umschrift hervorgeht. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 08:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Mai-Sachme, oh, da ist mir ein Fehler passiert. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich habe es gerade eben korrigiert.  Done Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 08:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Toeloop(figureskating).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Toeloop(figureskating).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Buchten2.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-Buchten2.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Buchten2.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Categories for discussion/2021/03/Category:Male Luxembourgish pronunciation

Hi, a category you created is up for discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion/2021/03/Category:Male Luxembourgish pronunciation Your input would be appreciated. Troll Control (talk) 08:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

File:De-Tastsinnen.ogg

File:De-Tastsinnen.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.134.102.11 22:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-wünschen.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-wünschen.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-wünschen.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-hochschieben.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-hochschieben.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-hochschieben.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:De-Souffleur.ogg
• File:De-Souffleusen.ogg
• File:De-Souffleuse.ogg
• File:De-Auktion.ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Durchschlag.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-Durchschlag.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Durchschlag.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:De-Oʻahu.ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hörbeispiel von knappe

Hallo Jeuwre, Das Hörbeispiel von "knappe" ist nicht korrekt. Grüße --Beitrag50330 (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC) Und das ist auch falsch für knappen--Beitrag50330 (talk) 18:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Beitrag50330, Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich korrigiere es. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 18:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hallo wieder Jeuwre

Vielen Dank für die Korrektur des Hörbeispiels "knappe"". Das Hörbeispiel "knappen" ist aber immer noch das für "knappe". --Beitrag50330 (talk) 10:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Beitrag50330, Du musst wahrscheinlich Deinen Browsercache leeren (oder mal kurz einen anderen Browser nutzen), dann kannst Du Dir das aktuelle Hörbeispiel anhören. Erneute upgeloaded habe ich gestern 19:00 Uhr, siehe: (runterscrollen zu 'File history'). Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 10:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

File:De-Durcheinander.ogg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi Jeuwre. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the "Nominate for deletion" link), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 14:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jeff, thank you for your redirect solution. I didn't had a redirect in my mind which is far better than the, even malformed, deletion request. Have a nice day --Jeuwre (talk) 20:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-umkleiden2.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-umkleiden2.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-umkleiden2.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-wie viel.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-wie viel.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-wie viel.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:De-Rechtswegen2.ogg
• File:De-Pizzas3.ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

File:De-Volkszählungen.ogg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

File:De-Harzer Roller.ogg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Gehaltserhöhung2.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-Gehaltserhöhung2.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Gehaltserhöhung2.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:De-Gehaltserhöhungen2.ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Steines2.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-Steines2.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Steines2.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:De-Steinen2.ogg
• File:De-Steins2.ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:07, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

de:Satz von Bayes

Hallo Jeuwre, könntest du vielleicht eine Tonaufnahme für de:wiki für den Artikel de:Satz von Bayes machen? Das wäre ganz toll :) Ich habe deine Aufnahme z.B. schon im Artikel de:Imputation (Statistik) verlinkt. LG Biggerj1 (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Biggerj1, gerne spreche [zat͡s fɔn ˈbɛɪ̯z] ein, gib' mir bitte bis heute Abend Zeit, dann kann ich es erledigen. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 07:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Jeuwre, gerne, ich hätte es jetzt so ausgesprochen wie der Herr in dem Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbMblKyVyDs Danke schonmal :) Biggerj1 (talk) 07:30, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Biggerj1, ich höre bei ihm [bɛɪ̯s] (mit scharfem 's'), allerdings ist das nicht eindeutig, weil die Tonqualität schlecht ist (Hall). Wenn man auf Youtube ihn hört (Deutsch) oder ganz deutlich ihn hört (English), dann sprechen beide [bɛɪ̯z] (mit weichem 's'). Was ist korrekt? Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Mhhh gute Frage, ich kenne die Lautschrift zu schlecht. Hier wäre noch ein Video [20] und de wiki hat eine Lautschrift für den Nachnamen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bayes Du siehst es gibt definitiv Bedarf für deine Aufnahme :) Biggerj1 (talk) 07:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

@Biggerj1

> de wiki hat eine Lautschrift für den Nachnamen

Leider gibt es dort keine Quelle, was jetzt nicht so ungewöhnlich ist, Aussprachewörterbücher führen i. d. R. keine Nachnamen (bis auf die allerwichtigsten, wie Lehmann, Meier, Schulze), so auch bei Bayes: weder Krech, Stock, Hirschfeld noch Max Mangold (Duden) noch Duden online haben den Namen. Nach den Regeln bei Wiktionary braucht man dann fünf Beispiele, hier Tonbeispiele, aus seriösen Quellen, um es 'Wiktionary-fest' zu machen. Youtube ist keine (!) seriöse Quelle, dann müssen schon große Anzahlen an gleichen Einsprachen einen Hinweis auf die Aussprache geben. Mit weichem 's' gibt es (nach wenigen Sekunden):

• [21] (von oben)

Mit hartem 's' wird es hier gesprochen (nach wenigen Sekunden, es sei denn, eine Zeit ist vermerkt):

• [22]
• [23] nach 1:36 mm:ss
• [24]
• [25]
• [26] nach 0:18 mm:ss

Wie gesagt, Youtube ist keine seriöse Quelle. Die original englische Aussprache mit weichem 's' scheint mir mindestens bedenkenswert (und damit die Sprecher mit hartem 's' auf Youtube zumindest schludrig, was die Aussprache angeht). Aussprachen auf öffentlich rechtlichen Sendern (br.de, ndr.de, dlf.de, ...) mit sprechgeschulten Journalisten habe ich leider nicht gefunden. Man könnte ja denken, Schulfernsehen, wie es früher vom BR ausgestrahlt wurde, müsste Bayes-Regel, Satz von Bayes oder ähnliches haben. Ich habe es nicht ergoogeln können. Ich kann es also bisher leider nicht einsprechen, die Aussprache muss vorher geklärt sein. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 08:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Hier wäre ein Schnipsel vom Deutschlandfunk: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ian-mcewan-maschinen-wie-ich-konfusion-um-mensch-und.700.de.html?dram:article_id=451715 da wird "Thomas Bayes" gesagt circa bei Restlaufzeit 3:48min (die oben neben dem blauen Button angezeigt wird) 2A01:C23:79FC:3600:393E:1E83:B458:685D

Hallo Biggerj1, ja, das ist doch schon mal gut, denn hier haben wir zumindest eine seriöse Quelle: man hört klar das weiche 's', ich werde [zat͡s fɔn ˈbɛɪ̯z] (also mit weichem 's') einsprechen. Wenn ich schon mal dabei bin: wie sieht es aus mit den Einsprachen für Bayes-Spiel, Bayes-Schätzer, Bayes-Klassifikator, hättest Du die auch gerne oder ist das irrelevant? Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Sehr schön Jeuwre :) Das ist ja richtig cool! Gerne kannst du die Wörter auch noch einsprechen. Vielleicht auch Thomas Bayes, da düfte man am Allgemeinsten die Aussprache festhalten können. LG Biggerj1 (talk) 09:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Vielen lieben Dank! Ich bin mir sicher ganz viele Personen werden den guten Herr Bayes wegen dir richtig aussprechen :) 2A01:C23:79FC:3600:393E:1E83:B458:685D 18:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Hörbeipiele von Brennnesseln

Hallo Jeuwre, Das Hörbeispiel von "Brennnesseln" ist nicht korrekt. Grüße --Beitrag50330 (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Beitrag50330, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich korrigiere es innerhalb der nächsten halben Stunde. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 15:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done --Jeuwre (talk) 15:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Jeuwre, Das Hörbeispiel von "Brennnesseln" ist immer nicht korrekt. Grüße — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beitrag50330 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Beitrag50330, doch: Du musst Deinen Browser-Cache leeren oder das Hörbsp. mit einem anderen Browser oder einem anderen Gerät (bspw. dem Handy) aufrufen. Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 07:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De-Effektes.ogg

Copyright status: File:De-Effektes.ogg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De-Effektes.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:De-Tischen2.ogg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hörbeispiel von stelltest

Hallo Jeuwre, das Hörbeispiel von "stelltest" ist nicht korrekt. Grüße --Beitrag50330 (talk) 12:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Beitrag50330, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich habe es neu eingesprochen und die Datei wurde erneut hochgeladen.  Done Viele Grüße --Jeuwre (talk) 08:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)