User talk:NahidSultan/Archive/2016

Your deletion of File:LOGO_HLC.jpg

Hello!

If this file shows the logo as it is visible on the homepage of the enterprise (Hapag-Lloyd cruises), then it would arguably be legit on Commons using template:PD-Textlogo, as it is build of only simple geometrical shapes and letters. Did you consider this option? Would an undeletion be possible? Kind regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 18:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

 Restored. Thanks for notifying me. best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 13:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mamata Mage Mula.9 (1985).jpg

I see you deleted this as a copyvio. There are a lot of other files by this user. See here. Might they be worth a DR? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Magog the Ogre, Sorry for replying late. Thanks for pointing it to me. I've checked user's all uploads. Marked some of them as copyvios and have inserted 'no permission' into couple of them. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 16:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File:BPATC.jpg

নাহিদ ভাই, বাংলা উইকি থেকে File:BPATC.jpg চিত্রটি কমন্সে স্থানান্তর করলাম। কিন্তু বুঝতে পারছি না এখন কি করতে হবে। তাই যদি ঠিক করে দিতেন ভাল হতো। ধন্যবাদ। --Kayser Ahmad (talk) 10:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

স্থানান্তরের জন্য ধন্যবাদ। আমি বর্ণনা ও ক্যাটাগরিসহ টাইটেলটিও ঠিক করে দিয়েছি :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 12:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Missing evidence of Permission

Hi NahidSultan, you tagged some the photos moved by me from EnWiki as 'missing evidence of permission'. In the licensing section of the images it is mentioned that the copyright holder Pragyanparamitadas publishes it under CC-BY-SA 3.0, which I believe is compatible with the WikiCommons rules.--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 03:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

You're pretty much right but we need written consent from the original copyright holder via Commons:OTRS that (s)he actually release them in the stated license. The process is in the box of 'missing evidence of permission'. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 05:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

I'll try to get a written consent from the original copyright holder via OTRS, but the problem is (s)he is inactive since 2013.--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 10:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

That sounds great. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 04:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Please undelete (and semi-protect, if you can) File:Debbie Rochon.jpg

You deleted a page after it had been overwritten with another image. The original image was not a copyvio. I think you'll find if you look at the image history that there was an edit war over the image for a while. --GRuban (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello? --GRuban (talk) 20:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for replying late as I'm travelling. The file seems to okay now. best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 03:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

I admit I was worried, when I saw you continuing to edit after I made the talk page request, but not responding to is. But as you write, it does seem okay now. Thanks. --GRuban (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Why have removed File:J.Romilly.jpg ?

Why have removed File:J.Romilly.jpg ? Give me a reason !

Thank you in advance. HaT59 ^Talk 17:58 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, The image was from the internet, that's why it is deleted under Commons:Deletion_policy#Copyright_violation. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Photo deleted

Hello the "35AH.jpg" that was deleted is owned by me. Credit was given to photographer. Please restore it. Many thanks. Chrstphr80

The original copyright holder needs to send a permission statement at permissions-commonswikimedia.org by using this email consent. If everything works out, an admin will restore the file.Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Photo Deleted

Hey NahidSultan,

I realized you deleted 2 files i uploaded few days ago. Those files completely passed the wiki commons requirement. Please state precisely your reason for deletion. Thanks.

Hi, you need to send a permission statement at permissions-commonswikimedia.org by using this email consent. If everything works out, an admin will restore the file. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File:القدرة اللحظية.png

Just a note that I'm about to restore this file -- math equations are not subject to copyright, and the image is just that with no other copyrightable content. Courcelles 06:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh, Thanks :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front view of Baba Adam's Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Fronton seems curve in reality so no problem; but the pliliers eral must be right. A small correction prespective better describe the monument. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I fixed it --Aftab (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Very good. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Idrakpur Fort (Panorama).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atia Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Best from this direction, but you could be more specific as this shows a side of the mosque, not the main entrance. 86.170.172.157 12:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bagha Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Buttercup Angel Statue & Va Beach Sunrise deletions

I'm not sure why you marked my angel buttercups statue as a copyright violation.

The statue is in my possession and I carried it to a field of buttercups at Virginia Beach to take the photo. I would not infringe on copyrights. I freely share my work so others may use it for their purposes.

Two other photos of Va Beach sunrises were also marked and deleted. These I took when I lived at Virginia Beach and personally got up to see the beauty of the sunrise. I'm dismayed that you would delete my contributions without asking me. It seems every year when I make a contribution to wikimedia, I get flack....makes me wonder why....

Rae Karen Hauck — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raekhauck (talk • contribs) 18:24, 08 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, According to Commons copyright policy if an image is uploaded from another website without the proof of permission statement which indicates that the file is in question is indeed compatible with commons license then it's generally get deleted. Now, regarding your three recent deletion of your file, they were grabbed from here then uploaded in here. In case you are the original owner of those photos, you need to send permission statement to COM:OTRS. Regards, ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Restoring File:Portrait, Tina Juretzek 2010.jpg

Hi, I see you are the admin who deleted this image (possibly more by the same uploader) back in January for not having proper licensing. I am an OTRS volunteer and we have received a permission statement (Template:OTRS ticket) providing this licensing information. Would you consider restoring? Please ping me either way and let me know. Am sure this artist is eager to have her stuff associated with her article. Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 10:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi KDS4444, Sure, the file is now restored. Regards, ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dhakeshwari Temple Complex.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anderkilla Shahi Jame Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zia Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sona Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Tilt should be corrected --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

corrected Aftab (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sona Mosque (angle view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bhubeshawar Shiva Mandir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bara Ahnik Mandir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dol Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

fixed. --Aftab (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abed Chaudhury.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Yoda Fountain IOLSF at Yoda Statue.jpg

File:Yoda Fountain IOLSF at Yoda Statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 16:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

You've deleted my photo "Rainy Lake Sunset with Boat Silhouette.jpg" for a copyright violation. This is wrong. This is a photo I took, uploaded and labeled as my own work, and used in a article to which I was making a contribution (Rainy Lake). Before I upload this photo again, I want assurance that you not continue to delete my contributions without warning. Please advise.

Jeffkantor

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:WikiSlavMalnova.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:WikiSlavMalnova.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 13:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Navaratna temple, Ullahpara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment There appears to have a perspective distortion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Fixed --Aftab (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gobinda Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajban Bihar Buddhist Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kantanagar Temple (front side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prativa Mutsuddi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajshahi Railway Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment This image file:Rajshahi Railway Station.jpg is much better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Perspective edited. Now much batter. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 18:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support File:Rajshahi Railway Station.jpg is also better, but I prefer this one for the article uses. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 18:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

file "Toutes_Personnes_sont_franches_en_ce_Royaume.png"

Bonjour NahidSultan,

The file "Toutes_Personnes_sont_franches_en_ce_Royaume.png" has been deleted by NahidSultan because of Copyright violation. I realised this file from a 1679 book, under "Domaine Public". So, I can't understand the reason why you did the deletion. My time is a bit short, so, if ever you delete my files, please give me good reason and the way I can correct an error. So far, as I need this file, I wish you will revert your deletion very soon. --Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 11:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, as I can see the file is clearly {{PD-old-100}}, with that said, we need to know the author name (I'm sorry as i don't understand language so i may have missed it) and the year of publication which is 1679 I believe. Now, the reason of the deletion was that you uploaded it as your own work. If you upload such work in future please be sure to put relevant copyright tags on them. Could you please provide the author's name so that i can restore it? Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 20:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear, this file is mine. I made it as an archive I need to follow my research in history. It is like a picture... and I use Gimp. The date is true. Other files are coming soon. --Bel Bonjour, Ambre Troizat (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

hmm, I understand but according to the copyright law copyright holder is the person who created the work, simply own a copy of the work doesn't automatically grant anyone the right of the work. However, that's not the case here, I simply need author's name to restore it as it is clearly PD-old. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 01:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:En Vogue in Concert.jpg

Hi NahidSultan. Can you check to see if File:En Vogue in Concert.jpg is the same as File:EnVogue2016.jpg which you deleted on February 12, 2016 as a copyvio? Looks like it might be the same uploader trying to upload the same file under a different name based upon this Wikipedia Teahouse post and the fact that their user talk page is pretty filled with only copyvio notifications. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, Hope it's not too late and no they are not. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for checking. Do you think the licensing on "En Vogue in Concert.jpg" is OK? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

I didn't find the image in google online search and the uploaded file is not that bad quality. So, it's probably user's own work. The deleted file uploaded by this user were not actualy direct copyright violation, they were just lack of license tag that's why they were deleted (people often do that in the fist time). Based on that I personally assume good faith. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Understand. Thanks again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

সাহায্য

নাহিদ ভাই আমার আপলোড করা চিত্র File:Bengali Letter Na.svg টি একটু দেখবেন। পূর্বে ভার্সনদুটি ভুল ছিল ইলাস্ট্রেটর দিয়ে তৈরি করছিলাম কিন্তু আপলোডের পর বর্ণটি পরিবর্তন হয়ে গেছে। তাই পূর্বের ভার্সনদুটি ডিলিট করে তৃতীয় ভার্সনটি রাখার অনুরোধ করছি। --Kayser Ahmad (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

করেছি। ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Removing club logo Borhave.

How can you do this!! it is our logo i am CFO of this club. Do not remove things which i am officially am CFO and in charge for!1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcel Borne (talk • contribs)

Please follow the procedure at COM:OTRS to get the file restored. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Puthia Rajbari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of several images showing de:Fichtel-und-Sachs-Bunker

Dear NahidSultan, you deleted four images from de:Fichtel-und-Sachs-Bunker (diff), among them File:Bunkermuseum SW.jpg. I couldn't find a deletion request or even a clear rationale for the deletion. As far as I remember, these files were mostly pictures taken around and inside the museum, showing no copyrightable items. But I might be mistaken. Thanks in advance for clarifying this for me!--Cirdan (talk) 11:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, the pictures are found in another website e.g. [1]. Most images found on the internet are copyrighted. If you've permission to release those photos please send a permission statement at permissions-commonswikimedia.org by using this email consent to get those restored. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I will notify the uploader.--Cirdan (talk) 17:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Marzieh Afkham.jpg

Hi! I want to know why you deleted File:Marzieh Afkham.jpg? It was a work of tasnimnews and tasnimnews is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You can see this [2]. GTVM92 (talk)

Actually Not. The news agency do use works of others that doesn't make them copyright holder. In the image it is clearly visible that thye copyright holder is Mahmoud Hosseini unless otherwise stated in somewhere else. So, Mahmoud Hosseini must send a release statement statement to permissions-commonswikimedia.org by using this email consent to get the file restored. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 13:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Mahmoud Hosseini is one of the photographers of Tasnimnews! The site is clearly sent the statement to all for publish it's works. There's no need for the permission for each images by each photographers! GTVM92 (talk)

Just not sure about it. Could you please point me a page where the site cited Mahmoud Hosseini as one of their photographers? I'm mainly confused because the same image appears in multiple sites without publication dates and authors name. Since the above news agency have a history of using other people's image (of course with attribution) I'm not sure whether Mahmoud Hosseini is their photographer or not. ~ Nahid ^Talk 13:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:আতিউর রহমান.jpg

ভাই, File:আতিউর রহমান.jpg চিত্রের উৎস, লেখক, লাইসেন্স ঠিক আছে কিনা একটু দেখবেন প্লিজ। না থাকলে ঠিক করা যায় কিনা। Kayser Ahmad (talk) 13:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

হ্যাঁ ভাই সবই ঠিক আছে :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 13:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm curious as to why you marked my file "Rainy Lake Sunset with Boat Silhouette.jpg" as a copyright violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffkantor (talk • contribs)

Because the file is found in another website in a higher quality that usually means they were copied from there. If that is the case then we need permission via Com:OTRS. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 09:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete of "Rainy Lake Sunset with Boat Silhouette.jpg"

Hello,

You've deleted my photo "Rainy Lake Sunset with Boat Silhouette.jpg" for a copyright violation. This is wrong. This is a photo I took, uploaded and labeled as my own work, and used in a article to which I was making a contribution (Rainy Lake). Before I upload this photo again, I want assurance that you not continue to delete my contributions without warning. Please advise.

Jeffkantor

I've already answered you in the section above, because the file is found in another website in a higher quality that usually means they were copied from there. If that is the case then we need permission via Com:OTRS. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 12:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

It was not copied from that site. I know, because it's my photo. Can you please restore?

Sorry, without valid prof I can't. ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

What constitutes valid proof? Frankly I regard your action as vandalism. You had no proof of a copyright violation, but went ahead and deleted the image without any inquiry. I see that you've done this to others as well. Please restore as soon as soon as possible, or inform me of the specific actions I should take.

I've found that the source of this image is here. If that flickr account belongs to you then you should change the license to CC-BY from all rights reserved. Once the license is changed I can restore the file. That's the only option. ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

I have changed the license to CC by attribution. Now please restore.

Done. ~ Nahid ^Talk 15:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Removal of www.couponmint.in logo

Dear Nahid,

Our logo that was uploaded on Wikimedia Commons, has been marked as a copyright violation, for some reason. Could you please clarify why. Thank you www.couponmint.in

Hi, the logo is considered as out of our project scope thus deleted as as spam. ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Deleted file

You recently removed an image that I uploaded for the page that I created. I have read the guidelines regarding the common licenses, but still do not know how to get the licence to upload the image I want. The image is in the internet and anyone can download it. Please let me know how to upload so there is no removal. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BB19wiki (talk • contribs) 10:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Works from the internet are copyrighted by default unless otherwise stated. According to commons copyright you can't upload other's work without their consent of free license. Please see COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. ~ Nahid ^Talk 15:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Remove IP block exempt Rights

Hello, Nahid bro Now I have no any free picture and my ipp block will expire in this month. so I don't need this rights now. so remove IP block exempt rights.★ Seth^talk 16:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Done. ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Question

How do I upload the Dark Disciple book cover without it being deleted? Which copyright rule do i select?Thursby16 (talk) 20:25, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Actually, you can't upload that cover without the consent and clear copyright release (cc-by or other commons allowable license) of it's publisher. ~ Nahid ^Talk 20:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Ariane 6 les chiffres clés.jpg

Je conteste votre suppression. Gnurok (talk) 09:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@Gnurok: & NahidSultan: I am answering this on the file’s talk page. Ariadacapo (talk) 10:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Ariadacapo, Perfect. It's already taken care of then. Please do let me know if I can help in anyway. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Hofstatt Einkaufs-Passage von Innen.jpg

The speedy deletion you made within a few minutes after the deletion request was rash, in my eyes. It is not proven that in fact the violation was the other way, [3] being a copyright violation in relation to File:Hofstatt Einkaufs-Passage von Innen.jpg on Wikimedia commons, especially as that picture has lower resolution than the Wikimedia one. Probably the originator released the picture to both Wikimedia and the online architecture magazine. thus there may be no copyright violation at all. Therefore I ask you to redo the deletion and wait until there is more information provided on the deletion discussion page. Best wishes, -- Karl432 (talk) 11:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Actually, there was no deletion discussion and file was tagged as speedy for copyvio. Second, quality is the same on both sites. Uploader maybe uploaded the image on both sites but we still need the confirmation. Until the confirmation the COM:PRP will still be applied here if you don't beleive it's copyvio. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

unblock me

Please brother unblock me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohelrana3 (talk • contribs)

You're not blocked anywhere, can you please email me a screenshot of your block message. ~ Nahid ^Talk 16:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File deletion

I see that you have deleted File:Love Advent 2014 video clip.ogg. This came from a source that was confirmed to have a creative commons lisence on 18:59, 10 December 2015 when File:Emily Ratajkowski.jpg was created. I just noticed that the source has reverted to a Standard YouTube License. Is there a way to use the other file as verification that this source was once licensed for creative commons?--TonyTheTiger (talk) 23:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

@TonyTheTiger: Actually, I'm not sure about it. I'll ask others opinion and let you know. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Is there someplace I could go to follow the discussion?--TonyTheTiger (talk) 12:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

I know you guys often have multiple IDs, so I am trying to figure out if I am getting blown off. I see you have done quite a bit of editing without trying to "ask others opinion" yet. What is up.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 04:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have multiple accounts (if that what you means). Actually, I asked others on IRC that's why you didn't see me on-wiki asking. However, the deletion was right. According to Template:Change-of-license, You can stop distributing your work under a Creative Commons license at any time you wish; but this will not withdraw any copies of your work that already exist under a Creative Commons license from circulation, be they verbatim copies, copies included in collective works and/or adaptations of your work. That said you uploaded the video after changing the license so we can't restore the file. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

and could you please open an undeletion request for wider community to response? ~ Nahid ^Talk 08:13, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

I am not sure what basis to make an undeletion request of the rule is clearly stated on change in license.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 17:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

What I meant was that you can always ask the opinions of wider community in COM:UD anytime you want (if you disagree with my opinion) though I strongly believe that according to the policy, the deletion was right. You can ask the basis of whether such narrow interpretation of the policy is right or wrong, perhaps? ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:10, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

রেকডিং আপলোড

সালাম নিবেন ভাই। আমার নামটা খারাপ হওয়ার জন্য আমও দুঃখিত। আপনার কাছে আমার একটা প্রশ্ন আছে। প্রশ্ন হলো "আমি যদি রেডিও থেকে রেকর্ড করা ফাইল উইকিমিডিয়াতে আপলোড দি যেমন ভুত এফ এম কিংবা কুয়াশা তাইলে কি আমি ব্লক খাবো? "

প্লিজ উত্তরটা দিয়েন :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boking Chuda (talk • contribs) 

রেডিও থেকে যেকোন কিছুর রেকর্ড আপলোড করা কপিরাইট ভায়োলেশন কারণ সেগুলোর সত্ব থাকে সংশ্লিষ্ঠ রেডিও প্রতিষ্ঠানের কাছে। সুতরাং তাদের অনুমতির প্রমাণ ছাড়া আপলোড করা যাবে না। একইভাবে ইন্টারনেটে প্রাপ্ত সকল ভিডিওর ক্ষেত্রেও একই কথা প্রযোজ্য। সবচেয়ে ভালো হয়, আপনি যদি প্রথমে নিজের তোলা ছবি আপলোড করেন মানে গুগল থেকে নিয়ে নয়। আপনি নিজে তোলেছেন এরকম ফটোগ্রাফ। উইকিমিডিয়া কমন্সে যে চিত্রগুলো অবশ্যই শিক্ষামূলক হতে হয়। আপনি আপনার এলাকার বিভিন্ন শিক্ষা প্রতিষ্ঠান বা বাংলাদেশের বিভিন্ন গূরুত্বপূর্ণ স্থানের ছবি আপলোড করার মাধ্যমে শুরু করতে পারেন। ছবিগুলো পরবর্তিতে উইকিপিডিয়ার বাংলাদেশ সংশ্লিষ্ঠ আর্টিকেলে ব্যবহার করা যাবে। এই সাইটটি ভিডিও বা রেকর্ড শেয়ারিং সাইট নয়। সবকিছু আপলোডিই করা হয় যাতে উইকিপিডিয়ার আর্টিকেলে ব্যবহার করা যায়। এছাড়াও, আপনি আপনার ইউজারনেইম Special:GlobalRenameRequest-এখানে পরিবর্তনের জন্য অনুরোধ করতে পারেন। ধন্যবাদ। ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

User:ManTK

Hi, I believe the user in question is a friend of @The Photographer: , and was testing the i18n functions of v2c. I have no idea why the upload is a copyvio though. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Unblocked. Those pirates are using various methods and sometime it's hard to identify without checkuser. I assumed him/her one of them for two reasons, one, the last part of his/her username which is a short form of Bangladeshi currency and his only upload was a copyvio video. Thank you anyway. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 16:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

It too was my fault, because ManTK was thinking that it was only a test and not real commons upload. --The Photographer (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:"BBQ at the Temple of Athena" (2015).jpg

You marked this as cc-by-sa-4.0 but the Wikipedia copy of the same file (w:File:Bbq athena.jpg) as 3.0. Is this really correct? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, artist gave the permission under "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International" license. ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Template:Copyvionote/bn

নাহিদ ভাই, {{Copyvionote/bn}} টা দেখবেন ঠিক থাকলে মুল টেমপ্লেটে সংযুক্ত করে দিয়েন। ধন্যবাদ __Kayser Ahmad (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

করেছি। ধন্যবাদ। ~ Nahid ^Talk 20:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

সরানো হয়েছে

াই দয়া করে বলবেন কি. কি জন্য আমার আপলোড করা shariyat and marifat . Jpg সারানো হয়েছে — Preceding unsigned comment added by De Mazid Islam (talk • contribs)

কমন্সে আপনাকে অবশ্যই প্রজেক্টে স্কোপের মধ্যে পড়ে এরকম কিছু আপলোড করতে হবে। বিস্তারিত, এখানে Commons:Project scope। ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

my file

why my file was deleted ????? ????— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetiyanea (talk • contribs)

Because the video you uploaded was copyrighted. All uploads on commons must be licensed under cc-by or public domain. please read, COM:L. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Bangladeshi girls taking Selfie at Pohela Falgun.jpg

File:Bangladeshi girls taking Selfie at Pohela Falgun.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

help

নাহিদ ভাই দয়া করে আমাকে Unblock করুন । — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akasi10 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

help

নাহিদ ভাই দয়া করে আমাকে Unblock করুন । — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akasi10 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Unblock

নাহিদ ভাই আমার Ip আনব্লক করুন দয়া করে । আমার Ip : 107.167.106.90 এবং Block id : #265518 । দয় করে Unblock করুন । — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akasi10 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

শুধুমাত্র উক্ত আইপি থেকে সম্পাদনাই ব্লক করা হয়েছে। আপনি একাউন্টে লগইন থাকলে সম্পাদনা করতে পারবেন। ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Keep On

Dear Please let me know the details of 1971 war issues — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 51.36.88.139 (talk) 11:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

please see Bangladesh Liberation War. ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

DELETED

I have recieved this message

(Removing "Albumcover_Finalprogram.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by NahidSultan because: Copyright violation, see c:Commons:Licensing.) (undo)

The picture of the album cover was directly provided to me by the copyright holder - Mr Richie George Turnbull, also known as Richie Program, the lead artist of the group Final program. I have his written permission to use the image. Please could you un-delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mursillis (talk • contribs) 18:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

As far as I remember, we talked over email and hope that the problem is solved. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Sorry I can't be as active on weekdays as on weekends. Thanks for your work. :) Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you , for your help 😀 Shihab1199 (talk) 06:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Sweet The Photographer (talk) 20:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

File: Tush1

Hello NahidSultan,

Trust you are doing good. Please kindly help undelete the Tush Magazine's Logo. It is a logo that has been used in public domain already and Tush Magazine possesses right to the logo. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzy anslem (talk • contribs) 21:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, We need COM:OTRS confirmation from the owner to restore the file. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 13:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Mother doll

Hello.File:Mother doll 1.jpg and File:Mother doll 2.jpg Licensed under free license Why are they "Copyright violation"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2 (talk • contribs)

Hi, Barbie is copyrighted by US company Mattel, Inc. We need COM:OTRS confirmation from the owner to restore those files. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 13:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Bangladesh

তাহলে কি আমি সব ছবিগুলো ডিলিট করে দিবো ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topumym (talk • contribs) 04:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC) এডমিন ছাড়া কেউ ছবি ডিলিট করতে পারেন না। যাইহোক, আপনি চাইলে প্রতিযোগিতার জন্য আপলোড করা আপনার ছবিগুলো আমি অপসারণ করে দিতে পারি। ~ Nahid ^Talk 09:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

HELP

ভাইয়া আমার আপলোড করা ছবিগুলো যদি ডিলিট করে দিতেন আমি আবার সেপ্টেম্বর থেকে আপলোড করা শুরু করতাম। দয়া করে ডিলিট করে দিবেন । — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topumym (talk • contribs) 04:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

করেছি। ~ Nahid ^Talk 05:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments translations missing

Hi NahidSultan, I noticed that some translations in Bengali are still missing for Wiki Loves Monuments. Can you provide them> See: Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016/Upload campaigns. You can provide them on that page. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 17:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

File:RZS logo.svg ফাইল অপসারণ প্রসঙ্গে

File:RZS logo.svg এটি রংপুর জিলা স্কুলের লোগো। লোগোটি ডিজিটালাইজেশনের কাজ আমি করেছি। কিন্তু এটিকে কপিরাইট লঙ্ঘন হিসেবে চিহ্নিত করা হয়েছে। এটির উপযুক্ত কপিরাইট কী হবে তা বুঝতে পারছি না। এ ব্যাপারে আপনার সাহায্য চাইছি। Jihan (talk) 11:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

লগোর কপিরাইটসত্ত্ব সংশ্লিষ্ঠ প্রতিষ্ঠানের। এ জন্য সংশ্লিষ্ঠ প্রতিষ্ঠানের লিখিত অনুমতি লাগবে যে, তারা লগোটি ফ্রি লাইসেন্সে দান করেছেন। ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ায় রংপুর জিলা স্কুলের যে লোগোটি দেয়া আছে সেটির লাইসেন্সে বলা আছে এটি কপিরাইট ও ট্রেডমার্ক দ্বারা সুরক্ষিত। এই একই লাইসেন্স ব্যবহার করে কি লোগোটি কমন্সে আপলোড করা যাবে? Jihan (talk) 12:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

না, কমন্সে শুধুমাত্র ফ্রি লাইসেন্সের ছবি আপলোড করা যায়। ~ Nahid ^Talk 12:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Mail for you!

Hello, NahidSultan. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Top contributor list

Dear Nahid bhai:

It is really lovely that Bangladesh is participating this competition this year for the first time. Congratulations to you all. I am writing to share an observation. I found top contribution list based on the uploaded picture count but I feel there should be another list based on the number of places the contributors has uploaded the photos.

Thanks, Rashed

Hi, Thank you for the kind feedback, Rashed. The stats is being displayed now is from automated feed. Unfortunately, we need to manually count the other stats on our own so I'm afraid it'll take sometime. But, hopefully it'll be available after Oct 15. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 18:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Need(Copy Right Act-2000 PDF)English Version

Copy Right Act-2000 PDF from (template:FoP-Bangladesh) Bengali is Ok but English version (template:FoP-Bangladesh/en) is unavailable. Same as (template:PD-Bangladesh/en), English version is unavailable in the internet too. Copy Right Act 1962 is not viable i/o 2000 which was amended by Bangladesh Gov during 2000 Ordinance. Confusion delays for the pending submission. Please help by updating multilingual PDF easy converter getting faster support and please also have a look for Category:Nawaab Syed Shamsul Huda discussion and advise necessaries.Rosepal8 (talk) 06:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for kind feedback.Rosepal8 (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

উইকি লাভম মনুমেন্টস ছবি প্রতিযোগিতায় কমপক্ষে ৫টি ছবি আপলোড করায় আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ!

সুধী, প্রথমেই ছবি প্রতিযোগিতায় ৫টি/তার বেশি ছবি আপলোড করার জন্য আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ জানাচ্ছি। আমরা পূর্বেই ঘোষণা করেছিলাম যে, ডাকযোগে কোন সার্টিফিকেট প্র্র্র্রেরণ করা আমাদের পক্ষে সম্ভব হবে না। সার্টিফিকেট সংগ্রহ করার দুটি উপায় রয়েছে, যদি আপনি প্রিন্ট কপি নিতে চান তাহলে দয়া করে ঢাকা, চট্টগ্রাম ও রাজশাহীর আমাদের নির্দিষ্ট উইকিপিডিয়া সম্প্রদায়ের সদস্যদের কাছ থেকে সংগ্রহ করতে পারবেন। অথবা, কেউ চাইলে আামরা ইমেইলে সার্টিফিকেটের সফ্ট কপি পাঠিয়ে দিবো। অনুগ্রহ করে, এই গুগল ফর্মটি পূরণ করুন। আমরা পরবর্তিতে আপনার সরবরাহ করা ইমেইলে যোগাযোগ করবো। এছাড়াও, এ বছর বাংলাদেশের বিজয়ী ছবিগুলো দেখতে এই পাতায় যান ও সকল দেশের বিজয়ী ছবি দেখতে এখানে ক্লিক করুন। উল্লেখ্য, আন্তর্জাতিক বিজয়ী ঘোষণা করা হবে ডিসেম্বরর প্রথম দুই সপ্তাহের মধ্যে। আন্তর্জাতিক বিজয়ী ও বিভিন্ন হালনাগাদ তথ্যের জন্য চোখ রাখুন আমাদের সামাজিক যোগাযোগের পাতাসমূহে @WLMBangladesh ধন্যবাদ।

#WLMBangladesh আয়োজকদের পক্ষ থেকে - নাহিদ সুলতান (আলাপ), Thursday 11:34, 03 November 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

QI

Hello! Thanks for your nominations of Quiality image candidates. I didn't see any review of you, but a lot of nominations. Please be so kind and review some images if you nominate new candidates. --XRay ^talk 05:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

@XRay: Hey, Actually I'm nominating them from WLMBangladesh contest and the reason I've abstained myself from reviewing because I know a little about the quality. But if this is mandatory to review image in order to nominate one, I'll stop. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

It's not mandantory. But it's good to review other images if you nominate a lot of images. We are all volunteers and currently all the others do this work for you. You decide nominating QI candidates, so IMO you can try to review some images. May be it's a good way to review an easy one first. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 06:29, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Well, I could try but I always feel, it's better to do nothing than doing it wrong. Anyways, I'll try to do some review and would appreciate your valued suggestions if there's something need to be improved. Cheers. ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

I am Sourov Saha. I uploaded more than five pictures in this Wikiloves monument 2016 Bangladesh compitition. i also submitted a form for getting my perticipation certificate in the mail but i didn't reciece anything in the mail. will you please help me in this matter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourov Saha (talk • contribs) 11:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

I've just replied you over mail. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

WLMBangladesh এর সার্টফিকে।

সার্টিফিকেট এর প্রিন্ট কপির জন্য ফর্ম পূরন করেছিলাম ১০ নভেম্বরের পরে।আপনারা কি সার্টিফিকেট দেওয়া আরম্ভ করেছেন? wiki id:Rezwan islam27 name:Rezwan islam email: eng.rezwan@gmail.com ফর্মটি কি আপনাদের কাছে পৌচেছে?প্রিন্ট কপির জন্য আবেদন করেছিলাম। Rezwan islam27 (talk) 16:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

আমরা ইতিমধ্যেই সফ্টকপিগুলো গতকালকে সবাইকে পাঠিয়ে দিয়েছি। প্রিন্ট কপিগুলো স্ব-স্ব শহরে এই মাসেই পৌঁছে যাবে ও তারাই আপনার সাথে যোগাযোগ করবে নেওয়ার জন্য। একটু দেরী হওয়ার জন্য দুঃখিত। ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Why deleted?

Why was this deleted, and so quickly that I didn't even have a chance to see what the complaint was? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

No FoP in Lux. Creator Jean Cardot is still living. ~ Nahid ^Talk 13:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! I didn't know that about Luxembourg. Sorry!

But why so quickly deleted that I didn't even have a chance to see what the complaint was? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

The tag placed on that file was Speedy deletion. Administrators usually browse through CAT:CV and check them whether they are okay to delete or not. They usually don't check the time (in case of speedy deletion because they are clear cut case usually copyvios) when the tag was placed. ~ Nahid ^Talk 15:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

OK, I didn't know a speedy deletion had been requested. Thanx. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 03:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Mr-yoga-galavasana-one-leg.jpg

Hi NahidSultan,

Please explain why the file I have uploaded: Mr-yoga-galavasana-one-leg.jpg was taken down.

A fellow Wikimedia editor clpo13 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Clpo13, advised me to post those files under Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en. It is in accordance to the website of the owner of the content, www.MrYoga.com. Please see http://mryoga.com/, and note every footer on every page has Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0.

If this advise is incorrect, please state a proper solution.

MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Incorrect deletion - you went against the advice of another admin - please note another admin has undeleted the file

HI NahidSultan,

I did not receive a response to my message yesterday. Please see the post above. I have noticed that you continued to do editing after I posted this message to you.

I am looking forward to hearing a rational reason for your actions and for you to offer a solution, unless you wrongly deleted the file, which I would appreciate an apology for.

Please also note that I requested undeletion of the rest of the photos, and it was granted by admin Sebari https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Srittau. If you continue to have an issue with these files, I suggest you talk to the two admins listed above, and I suggest you offer a solution. What would you like to do?

MilenaGlebova1989 (talk) 21:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@MilenaGlebova1989: Sorry for replying late. I was indeed editing but as I wasn't in home so I didn't take part in any discussion related edits. We often encounter such file where people just copied the file from another website and upload them in here. So, it is possible that I overlooked the permission at the bottom of the website. Either the permission of at the bottom of the site was added after I acted this speedy deletion request or I overlooked it which of course was a mistake. The file is now restored I can see. However, I'd suggest that if you upload such file in future please consider to put {{LicenseReview}} in them otherwise another admin might overlooked the license again. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

help

what is autoconfirmed user ? Please tell me . Zejjon (talk) 04:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Autoconfirmed users are contributors who are logged in to an account created more than four days ago. See details: Commons:Autoconfirmed users. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 07:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)