Peter Damian

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Peter Damian!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 11:26, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Peterdamian.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Peter Damian!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Peanut gallery.JPG is uncategorized since 10 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Escapefromvenice.JPG is uncategorized since 10 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Geni 2011-11-13B.jpg was uncategorized on 16 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Small_castle.JPG

File:Small_castle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 02:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm afraid the deletion debate is archived and so I am unable to change it. I apologize for the personal attack, it was a breach of Commons etiquette. I have visited the Wikipedia review recently and must have picked up some their apalling standards of behavior. --Simonxag (talk) 20:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the second personal attack. Peter Damian (talk) 08:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

[1], et al.

Please do not single out a single user's work for attack on Jimbo's page. It's rude, at the very least Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedians constantly confuse criticism with rudeness. Peter Damian (talk) 07:19, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Support

Hello. Thank you for your support regarding the images on this website. Very much appreciated. The Cleaner (talk) 22:36, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Symonds_2011-11-13A.jpg

More pictures please, Peter! :-D Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Peter you left a message for me on Wikimedia UK - sure I can talk you through the activity plan - you can find me best on en: or at gmail at the same nickname Victuallers (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Message

Hi. I left you a message here: File_talk:Johannesmagistris-square.jpg Lipedia (talk) 12:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

See the File page. Peter Damian (talk) 16:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Peter Damian. You have new messages at Beta_M's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: intimidating behaviour, harassment, specifically related to Beta_M. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

-mattbuck (Talk) 12:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

When a Wikipedian uses the term 'harassment', it should always be read with scare quotes. I.e. I am guilty of "harassment". Ha. Peter Damian (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblocked. There was no warning given that the behaviour should stop, never mind that it might be considered harassment and result in a block. Beyond that the questions appear legitimate and relevant to a current discussion. Furthermore, removal of talkpage access for a couple of minor digs at admins is unwarranted, and removal of email access is entirely unexplained (possibly an error).

That said, I'm warning you now that further such questions or comments on Beta M's talk page may be considered harassment and therefore may result in a block. Such questions or comments can be posted as part of the COM:AN/U discussion, and Beta M may still answer them if he wishes to. Rd232 (talk) 22:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

reblocked. The block was discussed by more than one admin, I have opened a discussion on the noticeboard on whether to unblock or not. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Unblocked

I have unblocked you as per this. You are to note of what is written in the closing. russavia (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Your user name

Hi, When you chose your user name did you expect to experience some of the problems that happenned to the original Peter Damian?--Peter cohen (talk) 03:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I thought it was probably a coincidence. I was googling for info on sexual abuse in the Catholic Church and found it interesting to see how the original Peter Damien got denounced by much of the Catholic establishment for his efforts to clean things up. Plus ca change...--Peter cohen (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

comments removed from User talk:Fæ

I have removed your comments from User talk:Fæ, as they are solely about English Wikipedia, and will surely cause further ill feeling here on Commons. If there is an issue here, hopefully someone in good standing at English Wikipedia will take the issue there. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 22:46, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

You are taking advantage of the fact I am banned on Wikipedia (for making complaints about administrator corruption there, which you promised to resolve in August 2009, but never did), to remove my further complaints about administrative corruption? John, that is fine. Peter Damian (talk) 06:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

For good or ill, this is a separate project. If you see problems on English Wikipedia, you'll need to share them with people who are in good standing on English Wikipedia, at let them decide whether to deal with them. Don't raise English Wikipedia issues here merely because the person also has an account here, otherwise you'll end up banned here too, and that path leads towards a global ban, and rightly so IMO. I approve of the emerging approach of "three project bans is a global ban", and hope that you'll avoid that as it is pointless martyrdom.

I have done more than my fair share to fix the problems there, and my efforts wrt you have often been thwarted by your own actions and decisions. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 12:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Carry on the good work

I'm aware you don't need my support or encouragement to continue, but I thought I would drop a note so you had a bit of praise on yer TP :) Egg Centric (talk) 23:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Peter Damian (talk) 14:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wikipedia Treason and Plot.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikipedia Treason and Plot.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 14:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

You forgot to add a license, and you need to provide a source for the image of the mask. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

JW's talk page

I have reverted your removal on JW's talk page with a warning. I have also responded here with a warning. I have also let another admin know here why I removed the thread in question. If that isn't enough, consider this fair warning that blocks will be handed out if a continuation of the campaign against the editor in question is continued here on Commons. This project is not an extension of sites you participate in, nor is it an avenue that can be used to harass others when the issue is shutdown on en.wp. russavia (talk) 01:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning Peter, I have absolutely zero tolerance for harassment of other editors. If you continue doing what you have been doing on this project in harassing another editor, I will not hesitate to block you. russavia (talk) 05:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Not so fast with the banhammer, Russavia. I'm certainly not seeing clear harassment here - Alison ^❤ 07:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: continuing to use Commons infrastructure to continue a campaign of harassment against another editor who isn't even active on Commons. Plenty of warning was given, but these warnings were blatantly ignored.. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

russavia (talk) 10:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Unblock

{{unblock|No harassment, simply linking to a page on meta which itself merely consists of links to en.Wikipedia diffs}} [[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] ([[User talk:Peter Damian#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 10:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Test

STABLE WIKIPEDIA There is stable version of this article here

Blocked

Blocked Indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you. This account hasn't been used since 2012 for anything but talkpage edits concerning Wikipedia issues, etc, and now to create an out of scope page where you insert a childish personal attack on Russavia. Commons isn't a forum to be used to get around your indef block at Wikipedia, or to attack Commons admins.

INeverCry 19:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Oh I see what happened. This was nothing to do with Russavia. I was creating a page to test a stable version concept. Then I inserted some imaginary vandalism of the kind you typically see on Wikimedia sites. That was all. I don't see what it has to do with user Russavia." Decline reason: "Disruptive editing. This account hasn't been used since 2012 for anything but talkpage edits concerning Wikipedia issues, etc, and now to create an out of scope page where you insert a childish personal attack on Russavia. Commons isn't a forum to be used to get around your indef block at Wikipedia, or to attack Commons admins. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:20, 25 August 2014 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)