User talk:Tm/Archive 6

Latest comment: 8 years ago by INeverCry in topic Joe Haupt Flickr uploads

Happy New Year

Happy new yeaaar, a 2015 of good things, wishes happy holidays --Pava (talk) 14:36, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Moon 01 (4347961117).jpg

 
File:Moon 01 (4347961117).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 08:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Lisbon 09 (14495647059).jpg

 
File:Lisbon 09 (14495647059).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin 17:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

 
File:Sauber C20 2001 Formula1 Racer Nick Heidfeld Petronas-Red Bull Racing LSideFront SATM 05June2013 (14597429951).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

 
File:Sauber C20 2001 Formula1 Racer Nick Heidfeld Petronas-Red Bull Racing AboveNose SATM 05June2013 (14620711153).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

 
File:Williams-BMW FW23 2001 Formula1 Racer Ralf Schumacher BMW Williams Racing LSideFront SATM 05June2013 (14598689524).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

File:1000000608.JPG (5493070924).jpg

 
File:1000000608.JPG (5493070924).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:1000000609.JPG (5492478839).jpg

 
File:1000000609.JPG (5492478839).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:1000000612.JPG (5493075462).jpg

 
File:1000000612.JPG (5493075462).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:1000000615.JPG (5492485723).jpg

 
File:1000000615.JPG (5492485723).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:1000000616.JPG (5493079952).jpg

 
File:1000000616.JPG (5493079952).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:IMG 3340.JPG (55131066).jpg

 
File:IMG 3340.JPG (55131066).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Trapped childhood memories (8337843679).jpg

 
File:Trapped childhood memories (8337843679).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 21:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

COM:AN/U

You have been mentioned here.

I would like you to comment on the AN/U case, where you are mentioned. Otherwise, if you continue edit warring, you may end up being blocked by an administrator.
DLindsley: Please do not alter other people's comments. I have reinstated Tuvalkin's notification above this section.    FDMS  4    03:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk page

Please archive your talk page, it's exceeding the 'template include size', which is why it's not rendering correctly. Thanks. Revent (talk) 03:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Please do not edit war

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


 
You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Lisboa - Rua da Conceição (2678274068).jpg). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

-FASTILY 08:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Taylor Swift GMA (8114159355).jpg

 
File:Taylor Swift GMA (8114159355).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 04:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Taylor Swift GMA (8114096325).jpg

 
File:Taylor Swift GMA (8114096325).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 04:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Taylor Swift GMA (8114100933).jpg

 
File:Taylor Swift GMA (8114100933).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 04:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 04:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Tm. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 19:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senado Federal do Brasil CDH - Comissão de Direitos Humanos e Legislação Participativa (14962605862).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senado Federal do Brasil CDH - Comissão de Direitos Humanos e Legislação Participativa (14962605862).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senado Federal do Brasil CDH - Comissão de Direitos Humanos e Legislação Participativa (14776402157).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senado Federal do Brasil CDH - Comissão de Direitos Humanos e Legislação Participativa (14776402157).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not edit war

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


 
You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:ZJ780 (8490634574).jpg). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

FOX 52 (talk) 04:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Senado Federal do Brasil É Lei (15600075955).jpg

 
File:Senado Federal do Brasil É Lei (15600075955).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 02:25, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File:É Lei (15405096618).jpg

 
File:É Lei (15405096618).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 02:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File:É Lei (15591264045).jpg

 
File:É Lei (15591264045).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 02:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

 
File:8ª Semana de Valorização da Pessoa com Deficiência (15750536820).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

 
File:8ª Semana de Valorização da Pessoa com Deficiência (15935860381).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado (15201323113) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado (15201323113) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:CAE - Comissão de Assuntos Econômicos (15201167063) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CAE - Comissão de Assuntos Econômicos (15201167063) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Note

Dear Tm,

Most of your recently uploaded images from this source do Not give the direct flickrlink for the images which you uploaded. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15635556337) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15635556337) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado (15201323053) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado (15201323053) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15635556907) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15635556907) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15635889770) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15635889770) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15797064136) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15797064136) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15820737055) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15820737055) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15822289422) (2).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plenário do Senado - Sessão Senado Jovem Brasileiro (15822289422) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

 
File:Puma Swede - AVN Expo Photos Las Vegas 2013 (8423011790).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FredWalsh (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

File:"Whats wrong with this photo?" (5959753522).jpg

 
File:"Whats wrong with this photo?" (5959753522).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

 
File:Im thinking of starting a group of official mis-spellings! (4022458925).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (15798765754).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (15798765754).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16420111662).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16420111662).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16421253855).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16421253855).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16235142377).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16235142377).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 08:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16234823669).jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Senado Federal do Brasil Plenário do Senado (16234823669).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Chenzw  Talk  14:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Captivating body. (6772396483).jpg

 
File:Captivating body. (6772396483).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Fine model on a boat. (6772368907).jpg

 
File:Fine model on a boat. (6772368907).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Awesomely pretty. (6775989097).jpg

 
File:Awesomely pretty. (6775989097).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Tantalizing. (6784061627).jpg

 
File:Tantalizing. (6784061627).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Astonishing & awe-inspiring. (6784063869).jpg

 
File:Astonishing & awe-inspiring. (6784063869).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Erotic model at the ocean. (6772383669).jpg

 
File:Erotic model at the ocean. (6772383669).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Enchanting smile. (6772398921).jpg

 
File:Enchanting smile. (6772398921).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Enticing model. (6775955063).jpg

 
File:Enticing model. (6775955063).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Temptation calling. (6775975351).jpg

 
File:Temptation calling. (6775975351).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Tempting look. (6772391241).jpg

 
File:Tempting look. (6772391241).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Jameela. (6775971517).jpg

 
File:Jameela. (6775971517).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Too hott. (6784076405).jpg

 
File:Too hott. (6784076405).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Voluptuous model on a boat. (6772371695).jpg

 
File:Voluptuous model on a boat. (6772371695).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Stunning model jumping. (6772373967).jpg

 
File:Stunning model jumping. (6772373967).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Radiant model in a bikini on a boat. (6775961555).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Csapdani (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Aphrodisiacal smile. (6772380395).jpg

 
File:Aphrodisiacal smile. (6772380395).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Csapdani (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Flickr photos.

Olá, ví que você verificou o licenciamento de uma das fotos(File:Sandy_no_Bourbon_Street,_2011.png) que enviei a partir do Flickr.

Será que poderia fazer o mesmo com essas outras três, por favor?

Agradeço desde já.

--Rodriguesnetoh (talk) 02:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

(note: revised above comment to not use ref tags or external links, for ease of reading) Revent (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Bots


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Views_of_Torre_de_Belém

Template:Cdw/layout JotaCartas (talk) 03:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Categories

Please create separate categories (such as I did here) when you mass upload flies that fit into a single category instead of flooding very broad categories such as Category:Food. - Takeaway (talk) 14:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Categorization

Hi, thank you very much for uploads from Flickr! But, please, next time firstly look at Commons category, eg. Category:Martina Hingis and in uploading window change main category --> Category:Martina Hingis in [year] (Category:Martina Hingis in 2014). It's a saving time for other editors, who must recategorized these images. Thanks.--Kacir (talk) 02:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Do not upload war

Do not upload war with other editors. If you revert an overwrite, and the other person reverts it again, report the matter to the Administrator's Noticeboard. Upload warring, even 'slow' upload warring over a matter of months, is disruptive (and pointless, obviously, as such wars have now dragged on for months on multiple files) and can result in blocks for both parties until they agree to stop. Revent (talk) 04:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Arsenopyrite, Panasqueira Mine, Portugal.jpg

Re: your revert

Tastes differ, but why do you suppose that an average WP user would want more featureless gray space around a nice, sharp mineral photo? Best, Pete Tillman (talk) 03:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Revert

Hi, Was there any particular reason as to why you reverted [1] ?
The categories are correct so I'm a tad lost here,
Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 20:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Variolation vial India.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Graham87 ([[User talk:Graham87|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Lisbon metro

Don't rollback. "Metro" is a noun, not the proper name. See also "Category:Rome metro". -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

See en:Lisbon_Metro and Category:Rapid transit stations by city and then see that the capitalization is the proper norm. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Stop it now, please, or I am going to block you. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
So now that i showed you that your editions, made against previous consensus, the standardization with other categories, instead of justifing your editions (as i showed that there is a standard in more categories than the one that you Category:Rome metro, instead of back up and discussing the diferences you treat to ban me, against policy???? Act as an adult and discuss your changes with others, before your editions (or if they are reverted), instead of treating with the banning stick. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
First of all, I do not like threatening a block. You left me no choice since you started rollbacking savagely. Second, you seem to have a long story of blocks for edit wars and reverts not discussed before. So, starting reverting an admin who is doing normal maintenance work then say "let's discuss" when the edit war has started and you're threatened of a block is not a good policy for winning the discussion. You should discuss before engaging an edit war. In the particular: standard names are in English. Thus "Linha Amarelha" is Yellow Line, and so on. Even the Milan metro has "Line 1", "Line 2", not "Linea 1", "Linea 2" and so on. "Metro" is a noun. Same for the stations: "station" is a noun (see even Category:London Victoria station, non "Station". You capitalize a noun only if it's an official part of the name (in English). Third: the synthiax in Commons is "Subject of topic", this is not en.wiki. Thus "Stations of xxxx", "Trains of xxxxx", "People of xxxxx", "Players of xxxx", and so on. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
See your discussion about capitalization and names of stations. Proper names should be (if possible) in the native name as you can see in the policy about categories. Also you were not doing administrative work, you were editing as a normal user, so dont tell me that you sticking the blocking hammer was out of context and irregular. If you want to make those changes open a category discussion and then if there is a consensus (or close to it) then you can make your editions, not entering as a "killer" threating to block left and right if someone disagres with you. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)



You have been blocked for a duration of 2 weeks

Template:Autotranslate

Blackcat Could you explain why stopping Tm from editing their own user talk page was necessary? This normally only happens when the talk page has evidence of serious abuse and has the disadvantage that block appeals or clarification cannot be discussed openly. Thanks -- (talk) 22:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
My mistake, , now he can edit his own talk page. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 00:06, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Blackcat questions concern me. If you were performing the same kind of ordinary maintenance any contributor could perform, not specifically administrator maintenance, you and Tm should have engaged in a discussion. There is no way you should have put on your administrator hat to block him for two weeks, or two hours.
Tm asked you to look at Category:Rapid transit stations by city. It shows a mixture of capitalization styles. So, shouldn't both of you have stopped, and called for a discussion? Being entrusted with administrator authority didn't confer infallibility on you.
Shouldn't you have called upon an uninvolved administrator to decide whether a block was in order, since you were an involved administrator? Geo Swan (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Geo Swan, I don't claim infallibility. I simply noticed that the user was keeping on reverting while pretending of discussing and he didn't stop even when I told him not to do or I would block him. Had he stopped reverting for keeping on discussing I wouldn't have blocked him. I do not like blocking people and tend to avoid it if I can do. On the other hand he has a story of senseless revertings and edit wars and seems not to be able to stop and discuss before doing anything. The fact he kept on reverting while calling for a discussion made me doubt of his good faith and I felt fooled. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 07:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
@Blackcat Checking the revised block log, you appear to have blocked Tm from email communication. I can see no discussion of abusive emails, so why would that be needed? Please keep in mind that Tm is one of our top content contributors, see User:Fæ/Userlist, and this is sufficient reason to handle a dispute with care and respect. -- (talk) 09:05, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
@Tm would you consider an unblock request please? Though on Blocking policy we do not spell out that if blocks are needed they should gradually escalate, this is still the norm. Jumping from your account being blocked for an hour 18 months ago, to a two week block appears heavy handed at best. This block should be open to an early removal, given the context of the blocking administrator being involved in a way that makes this appear controversial, and the mistake made when inappropriately blocking you from communicating.
By the way, as a major content contributor myself, I strongly recommend walking away from naming disputes. It's a lame way to invest our time. On occasion I have kicked off community discussion, but these may take years to settle down into sensible naming guidelines. I tend to only get involved by providing some statistics on name conventions, or pointing out external standards, so that the community can speak to the facts. -- (talk) 09:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
, you forgot that the user has a long story of edit warring. The fact that his last block was "only" 1 day shouldn't make you forget that before that he was handed 2-weeks blocks in series. I am still convinced to have administered a fair block because according to the user's block log I should have been handling at least 1 or 2 months. That apart other admins had warned in the last 18 months not to do edit wars or upload wars, thus the user doesn't seem to have lost that habit. Anyway, since this block seems controversial I removed it hoping that this helps the user stopping reverting before discussing. With the warning that next time I see him engaging in reverting with whatsoever user the block will be heavier than 2 weeks. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 09:15, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the block early, it seems a sensible way to defuse any drama and I am happy to step away. Template:=)
I am sorry, I cannot see evidence of being "handed 2-weeks blocks in series" in the block log. I can see old blocks, but normally an admin would not consider anything "escalating" if the history is over a year old. We should allow for people to learn, and for old history to be left behind.
Please consider the benefits of letting other administrators handle actions involving Tm if needed in the future. It is bad form to create controversy, or to be seen to create controversy, when using sysop tools. This is why BP mentions it, and it is better to avoid creating noticeboard discussions on blocks, they eat up volunteer time and are never going to satisfy everyone. -- (talk) 09:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

@Tm: Please post a formal {{unblock}} request in order to appeal the block. Further, consider archiving your talk page so that this template will work. If there is no formally working unblock request on your talk page, there is nothing we can do, I fear. -- Rillke(q?) 10:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Rillke, Tm is already unblocked. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:16, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Template transclusions

Hi, due to the length of your user talk page, templates will no longer transclude and display correctly, including standard signatures, see en:Wikipedia:Template limits. This can be fixed by archiving discussions, or by removing templates. Let me know if you want Faebot to help out on this page by 'shrinking' DR notices. Thanks -- (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Rose pictures

Hello Tm,
I just saw the rose cultivar pictures you uploaded... they look as if they were made in a rose garden (do you know where?)
A pity that there's no information about the cultivar names - that would be really useful information...
Best wishes, Anna reg ([[User talk:Anna reg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunally i do not know where the photos were taken, except that they are probably taken in Galicia, Spain, as the user is from Pontevedra and he uploaded, to flickr, two albuns of expos of Camelias ocorred in Fonseca and Boiro, Galicia. But this info doesnt help much, so sorry. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki ([[User talk:Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

European People's Party

Note you've upload a lot of pictures from the European People's Party flickr stream which you've already before (May 31st, 2014). Henxter ([[User talk:Henxter|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

+ACK, please cleanup. This will also improve the ratio of used images. --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Plenário do Senado (18885099114).jpg

Image failed to upload properly. --Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Imagens no Wikimedia commons.

Olá Tm, tudo bem? Se possível, gostaria que você me ajudasse deletando algumas fotos que carreguei no commons para ilustrar principalmente artigo de artistas, como o da cantora Sandy.

Algumas eu fiz o upload pra DEPOIS enviar o e-mail com pedido de permissão para o autor da foto (reconheço o erro, e até hoje praticamente ninguém me respondeu, então desistí de pedir a autorização). Em outras o autor concordou, mas depois que soube que não poderia restringir o uso comercial, voltou atrás. Enfim, vou evitar carregar imagens antes de ter certeza absoluta de que está tudo correto!

Por favor, me ajude excluindo os seguintes ficheiros (sim, é um bocado, me desculpe):

[[2]] [[3]] [[4]] [[5]] [[6]] [[7]] [[8]] [[9]] [[10]] [[11]] [[12]] [[13]] [[14]] [[15]] [[16]] [[17]] [[18]] [[19]]

--Rodriguesnetoh ([[User talk:Rodriguesnetoh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Hamburguesa. (16161542578).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Jean11 ([[User talk:Jean11|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Monchique Files

Greetings Tm

Are you superstitious of the No.13. I notice you did not include the number in the renaming of a File:Jardim do Largo dos Chorões, Monchique (15843588753).jpg" Laugh out Loud!!! Kolforn ([[User talk:Kolforn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Concelho of Silves

You have moved the category Concelho (municipality) of Silves into the category Silves. There should be a distinct difference between the two categories. Category: Silves should be a deposit for photos of the town of Silves. The Category:Concelho of Silves should be a place to find files relating to settlements within the municipality of Silves, some of which are some distance from the town of Silves and really do not need to be in the single Silves category. I don't think that the situation you have created and the way you think it should be organized will help anyone to find files pertaining to a specific settlement with in the municipality of Silves as they are scatted across, and amongst other unrelated Categories within the Silves page.Kolforn ([[User talk:Kolforn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Oceanarium (3576367231).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Oceanarium (3576418825).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Oceanarium (3576425577).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Stas ([[User talk:Stas000D|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Districts of Albufeira

Hello Tm

Before pushing what you think is right it would be more constructive if you discussed you're intended changes. You have repeatedly showed that you have your own agenda which you do not seem to be interested in discussing with others. This is not a good way to contribute to this project. Lets have some good faith here as I do not wish to fall into some sort of edit war with you. Lets have some constructive conversation here. Kolforn ([[User talk:Kolforn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

  • You are the one that is creating new categories, disregarding an already established hierarchy on subdivions and naming (like your naming of "Seixal" as "Municipality of Seixal"). The districts in Portugal are regional administrative divisions that aglomarate several municipalities, not subdivisions of municipalities.

So they are not the same as districts in other contries and your categories create confusion and ambiguation; for that see Category:Districts of Portugal, and see what are portuguese districts.

For subdivisions of municipalities there is already established Category:Freguesias of Portugal as subdivisions of portuguese municipalities. At best some comparable in english would be neighbourhoods.

About your last comments you are the one that is not making files being categorized in their all proper categories, and on top of that, you categorize files in categories and its parent categories (like the ones on Albufeira windmills), creating but not linking categories with all its parent categories (like the Category:Buildings in Albufeira, Portugal). Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

    • You have me confused with another person. I have never created "Category:Seixal" as "Municipality of Seixal" or even added any edits to a "Seixal". please get your information right.

Kolforn ([[User talk:Kolforn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magnolia677 ([[User talk:Magnolia677|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Lisboa

Look, this is a redirected category... Wieralee ([[User talk:Wieralee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:31, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

And? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Files in redirected categories are hidden, nobody can see them... They have to be empty... There's a special site with such errors to fix them as soon as possible. Wieralee ([[User talk:Wieralee|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Thee are bots for that. And in any case you haver moved them you should move them to were Lisboa redirects and not Unidentified locations in Lisbon. They might be unidentified locations to you, but not to others users, and so by your move you mix reslly unidentified images with others lazily moved to that location. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Açores 2010-07-21 (5113117481).jpg

Template:Autotranslate PhysalusAntiquorum ([[User talk:PhysalusAntiquorum|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Castelo Branco Classic Auto DSC 2428 (17533349391).jpg

Could you please tell me why you absolutely want to add the Category:Chevrolet automobiles to this file, although it has already the Category:1951 Chevrolet automobiles ? Perhaps i have missed something. --MMFE ([[User talk:MMFE|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Because of this. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Marcas de água

Why?

Why you did this, and without any talk?

Yanguas ([[User talk:Yanguas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Logos on images

Hi, I see you have reverted my cropping of one of your images, of a heron, to remove the logo and reduce the area of blank blue sky. I can see you may have an artistic interest in having your images formatted as you created them - I will of course now create a cropped version with "cropped" added to the filename so we can use the image in Wikipedia with minimal bluespace (if that's the word), but I would like to draw your attention to the policy on logos, which is that they are deprecated throughout Wikimedia. I do not wish to have an edit-war so I hope we can agree that the logo can be removed, whether by cropping, by painting out the logo area with blue, or by uploading an original version without the superimposed logo. Thank you. Chiswick Chap ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Plenário do Senado (21836192810).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Ao menos tenha a decência de justificar suas reversões indevidas. Qual é o seu problema? Chronus ([[User talk:Chronus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Responda ao invés de praticar vandalismo através de guerras de edições. Seu comportamento abusivo só representa suas intenções baixas e sua falta de argumento. Vou comunicar a administração. Chronus ([[User talk:Chronus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Veja Commons:Avoid_overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop. Esta imagem já estava a ser usada na en wikipedia. Leia e aprenda primeiro, em vez de acusar os outros e deixe-os responder em mais do que 2 minutos, antes de acusá-los de má fé. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Aprender com você?! Você sequer sabe escrever em português, rs. Além de promover guerras de edições com a desculpa de defender as políticas. Carreguei outro arquivo. Agora a "sua" imagem não será usada em nenhum lugar. Chronus ([[User talk:Chronus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Pelo menos uma coisa poderia aprender a ser menos arrogante, coisa que parece ter para dar e vender. Saiba que o português está correcto, conforme as regras do português de Portugal pré Acordo Ortográfico de 1990. O único erro é de carácter sintáctico em "má fé", devido a escrever num teclado que não tem hífen.

Quanto a ter carregado a sua versão da imagem, espero que seja feliz, pois a mim, em bom português, nem aquece, nem arrefece. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Church in Marvão (16361810427).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

You may not claim that a work has been placed under a specific license such as CC-0 unless the creator of the work has specifically, and explicitly done so. Someone who is reviewing licenses should be well aware of that, since ensuring that licenses are correct is the entire purpose of being a license reviewer. Don't do it again. Revent ([[User talk:Revent|int:Talkpagelinktext]])

Bottomless

Please do not add the category Bottomless to images that do not show clothes at all. Bottomless means wearing clothes from the waist up and nothing below the waist. If no clothes are visible in the image it is not considered bottomless. Alice2Alice ([[User talk:Alice2Alice|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

apology

I agree with a point you made about the car wash images. I mistook who placed additional images into the discussion in the first of my two comments on User talk:Yann. My apologies. Geo Swan ([[User talk:Geo Swan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Church in Marvão (16361810427).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -- Tuválkin 14:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Camiños de Armenteira (6719024177).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Elisardojm ([[User talk:Elisardojm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Darwin Ahoy! 18:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your reverts in "Files uploaded by User Tm to check"

Good morning.

You reverted a couple of my edits like this one concerning Lockheed P-2 Neptune after I had put them into their proper category. They had been put by you (not by the author) into your Category:Files uploaded by User Tm to check without having any category containing the subject of the file. This category has also been intentionally marked by you as not being a "hidden cat", featuring its title prominently.

If a file has no category whatsoever and can be found bearing a "to check" label, it is quite natural that a specialist will attempt to find correct categories. Once assigned, the file is to longer to be in a "to check" box, since the problem is solved.

In case you feel a certain aircraft image is not yet properly or not all categorized, it should be put into Category:Aviation files (check needed). This would be the right place where it could be easily detected and treated by the experts. When this has been done, it will be moved from the "check needed" to a correct category (see the rules in "Category:To be checked", which also mention deletion from such a category).

Of course, you may also create a hidden new category like "Files uploaded by User Tm". But in such a case one should be careful, as you are not the author and do not hold the copyright.

By the way: I just found a contribution "Airplanes to check" here on your own talk page, dated 16:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC). Already then you had been asked to use Category:Unidentified aircraft instead of "to check". Regards --Uli Elch ([[User talk:Uli Elch|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Categorization 2

Hi, really other editors have to recategorized files uploaded by you? These are useless edits and wasting time – Rafael Nadal, Urszula Radwańska + others.

Try to write exact year (direct Category:Urszula Radwańska in 2015).
I called your attention to categorization in June. Best regard--Kacir ([[User talk:Kacir|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Lisboa IMG 6849 (20932102190).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Darwin Ahoy! 09:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

A.Savin

Template:Notice

File:R1033666w (7989473206).jpg

Template:Autotranslate Threeohsix ([[User talk:Threeohsix|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Failed Uploads?

It seems like you have many images that failed to fully upload above. Regards, --Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Comment Thanks for the heads up. I dont understand why did this upload in the first place as many seem to be duplicates, but i´am making a cleaning nominating the duplicate ones and reuploading the good ones, so these list should shrink. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:03, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Uploads do Flickr user Ze Caetano

Caro TM, necessito da sua ajuda a categorizar as imagens na Unidentified subjects in Portugal. Só restam 14 e são todas de uploads feitos por si do flickr user Ze Caetano, que não deixou nenhuma identificação que nos permita transferir as fotos para uma categoria mais apropriada. Pode perguntar-lhe onde são as fotos? --Threeohsix ([[User talk:Threeohsix|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Rodrigolopes ([[User talk:Rodrigolopes|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Joe Haupt Flickr uploads

Hi Tm. Just a quick note: If you transfer files from the Joe Haupt Flickr stream, we have Category:Photographs by Joe Haupt to put them in. Flickr2Commons really mangled your transfer of lighters with a bunch of partial uploads. It did the same thing to me last week. You may want to check Category:Flickr images needing human review after a transfer to see if it malfunctioned. I've had to re-upload quite a few images by hand and then retag them for {{flickrreview}}...INeverCry 21:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Update: The 100 or so partials have been re-uploaded and reviewed (with plenty of help from Amitie 10g). I've added all the lighter images to the Joe Haupt category.

    PS. Can you please archive your talkpage? It crashed my browser...   INeverCry 23:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Tm/Archive 6".