BaptisteGrandGrand

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BaptisteGrandGrand!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Répartiton géographique de Tetracerus quadricornis.png

File:Répartiton géographique de Tetracerus quadricornis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 09:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Collages

Please look your two collages. One source file for both of them is missing. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

@Taivo: I think he was deleted. That's it ? Thank you and I'm sorry for my english :) --BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 10:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Such collages are not allowed. I deleted both collages. You can make other collages, if you want, but if even one of source files is not free, then whole collage will be deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

@Taivo: However I employed W.Commons's images. Furthermore I had a question with reference to the licence : Can I import images arise from official sources (Russian Armed Forces) ? --BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 10:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Soukhoï frappant une position ennemie en Syrie.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Soukhoï frappant une position ennemie en Syrie.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 16:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pertes totales en Syrie (2011 - octobre 2015).jpg

And also:

• File:Guerre civile syrienne belligérants.pdf

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Zika outbreak image

Baptiste, I saw that you included the Caribbean states in your image, but you only colored with orange in the zoomed part. Could you please color also the part that is being zoomed? Thanks, and sorry if I am not being very clear.

--Arthurteb303 (talk) 22:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Those parts are not contaminated, for the moment. But thank you Arthurteb303 for your description --BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 18:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

File:État islamique durant la bataille de Palmyre (2016).png

File:État islamique durant la bataille de Palmyre (2016).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 21:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Map of zika virus distribution in latin america

Hi, when I read the zika virus article I found your nice map of latin america. It shows in the rough view that the DOMINICAN REPUBLIC has Zika, but in the detailed view it is HAITI... Do you think it is possible to get this contradiction settled? Thanks to you and your great work from Tschips --Tschips (talk) 09:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I created this map in february. Today, indeed, Dominican Republic and Haiti are infected by Zika (source). Thanks for your message and sorry for the expression, I'm French. --BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 14:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Blason de Folpersviller.svg

File:Blason de Folpersviller.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

B dash (talk) 03:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Pertes belligérantes totales (à octobre 2015).jpg

File:Pertes belligérantes totales (à octobre 2015).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 03:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Insigne de l'unité "ISIS Hunters"de l'AAS.png

File:Insigne de l'unité "ISIS Hunters"de l'AAS.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

B dash (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Emmanuelle Wargon 2019.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Emmanuelle Wargon 2019.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 21:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

CJNG

Bonjour,

Merci pour votre travail sur le logo du Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generación. Est-il possible d'indiquer la source que vous avez utilisée pour réaliser ce logo ? J'aimerais pouvoir vérifier qu'il est bien représentatif de celui employé (actuellement ou le plus souvent) dans les publications ou affichages de ce cartel. Merci d'avance.

El Comandante (talk) 09:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Il n'y a pas de logo officiel, plusieurs sont utilisés. Je m'étais basé sur ça et ça. J'allais en faire un supplémentaire basé sur cette photo.

L'autre logo que j'ai fait

— Preceding unsigned comment added by BaptisteGrandGrand (talk • contribs) 12:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

--BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Merci pour la réponse et merci pour votre travail de qualité. Je l'ai effectivement trouvé depuis, mais il me semble que c'est une variante qui n'est pas très usitée, que je n'avais personnellement jamais croisé en lisant des dizaines d'articles sur ce cartel. Le plus courant semble être beaucoup plus dépouillé, et n'utiliser que des lettres capitales avec un minimum d'effets esthétiques. Il pourrait être important de le préciser dans la page de description du fichier, si on peut l'établir un tant soit peu, parce qu'en l'état, l'utiliser comme logo principal sur les articles sur ce cartel, en espagnol et en français, notamment, me semble relativement trompeur. J'aurais plutôt utilisé comme modèle quelque chose de plus simple comme [1], [2], [3], [4], ou [5] (en noir et blanc), et surtout pas des graphismes plus esthétiques mais moins représentatifs comme [6] ou [7]. En gros, quelque chose de proche du deuxième logo que vous avez réalisé, mais sans les cartes du Jalisco autour.

El Comandante (talk) 18:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Je vois. D'après les images que vous avez partagé j'ai fait ces deux logos :

--BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Au top ! Merci ! El Comandante (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Parfait. Si tu as d'autres références, n'hésite pas.

--BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Fichiers 2019-nCoV

Bonjour BaptisteGrandGrand,

Êtes-vous sûr que les scanners et radios du coronavirus que vous avez importés (ici et ici) sont libres de droit ? Vous avez indiqué Journal of Korean Medical Science comme source, mais le site n'a pas l'air libre (et cette page indique un copyright «© 2020 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences»). Après, il y a peut-être une exception concernant l'imagerie médicale de ce type que j'ignore ?

Merci à l'avance pour vos éclaircissements. Cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour Titlutin,

A vrai dire, je pense, car l'article dans lequel ont été publiées les images stipule : "This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.".

A moins que ce ne soit pas accepté quand même.

--BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 21:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Aah d'accord, merci je n'avais pas vu cette mention :)

C'est bien une licence Creative Commons (CC), malheureusement la mention « Non-Commercial » (NC) pose problème, car Wikimedia Commons n'accepte que des fichiers dont la réutilisation commerciale est autorisée.

Vous pouvez prendre connaissance des différentes licences CC acceptées ou non dans le tableau récapitulatif sur la page suivante : Commons:À propos des licences#Licences courantes. L'article du JKMS a une licence « CC-BY-NC », ce qui n'est pas compatible avec la licence de notre site. Seules 3 licences CC sont acceptées ici, que vous pouvez voir dans le tableau (en gros, il faut que 2 choses soient autorisées par la licence pour que le fichier puisse être téléversé ici : modification et réutilisation sans condition, même commerciale).

J'ai bien peur que ces fichiers ne puissent donc pas rester. Souhaitez-vous les proposer à la suppression vous-même, ou voulez-vous que je le fasse ?

Cordialement --Titlutin (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Je les ai proposés à suppression.

--BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Flag and coat of arms of Floriana

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of Floriana.svg and File:Coat of arms of Floriana.svg - they are a long overdue improvement on File:Flag of Floriana, Malta.png and File:Coat of arms of Floriana, Malta.JPG which I had uploaded in 2013. I nominated the old low-quality files for deletion. All the best! Xwejnusgozo (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

I replied to a request to pass the flag and coat of arms in svg. I'm glad it helps!

--BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 11:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

1993-2006 Floriana Arms

• 

@BaptisteGrandGrand: Hello there, sorry for intruding, but since you helped me out on two recent requests involving symbols of Floriana (and thanks again for that, by the way), I was wondering if you could perhaps help with one more request involving a symbol of Floriana. As you can see, the image above is the 1993-2006 version of the arms of Floriana. However, for consistency's sake, I was thinking that perhaps the above arms should be changed to match the flag version of it that you created earlier today? Obviously I'd understand if you disagree, or if you're unable to, but if you do decide to help, I would suggest overriding the above File instead of creating a new one, as it's already in SVG, and it probably wouldn't make too much sense to have two SVG versions of the same arms on Wikimedia Commons. Sorry about this, it genuinely didn't cross my mind when I made the request about the flag version in the Graphics Lab. But it certainly would be a great help now, if you're able to of course, but again, I do understand if you're unable to. Sorry about this, and thanks again.

Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

@Snow Lion Fenian: Hello. No problems and yes it makes sense. I will.

--BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 11:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

File:LDNA logo.png

File:LDNA logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Triángulo de las Bermudas Guanajuato.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Triángulo de las Bermudas Guanajuato.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: It is indicated with

, the map backgroung is from Open Street Maps (it is free for use). And the other parts are by myself. --BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

I think you should remove claims of own work and license other then OpenStreetsMaps. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: No, it is stated in the OBdL itself: "This license requires attribution to be attached to maps produced from OpenStreetMap data, but does not require that any particular license be applied to those maps" --BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Los Zetas logo.png was recently deleted

File:Los Zetas logo.png was recently deleted by EugeneZelenko for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Can you explain why you deleted this logo, since it was made by myself? --BaptisteGrandGrand (talk) 14:08, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Are you author of original design? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Cártel de Santa Rosa de Lima logo.png was recently deleted

File:Cártel de Santa Rosa de Lima logo.png was recently deleted by EugeneZelenko for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Aztec code example.svg was recently deleted

File:Aztec code example.svg was recently deleted by Túrelio for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Wrong file extension (svg no png like I needed)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Formiate de méthyle 3d.png

File:Formiate de méthyle 3d.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Kankara boys' secondary boarding school after kidnapping.jpg

File:Kankara boys' secondary boarding school after kidnapping.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyright infringement / piracy Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Rémih.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Débora Hallal durante Miss Teen Mundial (cropped).jpg

File:Débora Hallal durante Miss Teen Mundial (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Found here before upload - https://www.instagram.com/p/BSbcE3uDn9O/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

iNaturalist

When using {{Inaturalist}}, make sure to include the ID number from the observation page (like https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/92011692), not a photo page (like https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/152278892). The template only supports observation IDs, and there's no way to tell them apart. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

iNaturalist license reviews

Hi Baptiste - when adding photos from iNaturalist, please remember you must include a license review tag; add {{iNaturalistReview}} after the license. This means that the iNaturalistReviewBot automatically reviews the license to make sure it is valid for Commons. This is needed, because iNaturalist contributors can change their license later; if they change to a more restrictive license, then Commons has no way of knowing if the license was originally valid or not, unless it has been independently checked by the review bot. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 17:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Alyssa Carson 2 (cropped).jpg

File:Alyssa Carson 2 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

File:María Pantoja Sánchez.png

File:María Pantoja Sánchez.png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: COM:CSD#F3, image derived from deleted image If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Ovruni (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)