Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fabian RRRR!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


Contents

TUSC token c8b4e6878462de34aa9bac9cec8834ebEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Phot-12-04.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

FilenamesEdit

Deutsch: Hallo. Ein Tipp:Wenn du Dateien hochlädst, dann ist es sinnvoll, diese aussagekräftig zu benennen und bei Fotos vorher einen etwaigen fehlerhaften Rand wegzuschneiden. Grüße von ..
English: Hello. It woudt be nice to give images a more specific name and to cut away unusable borderareas before upload. Gretings from ...

Cäsium137 (T.) 15:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Ja, ist mir (mittlerweile) auch aufgefallen. Ich mach's im zweiten Durchgang - bis dahin müssen die Cats herhalten. Viele Grüße, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 16:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Wäre nett, wenn du sie zumindest teilweise neu hochlädst, denn du kannst sie anpassen und Vorlage Badname verwenden. Dann werden die alten besonders schnell gelöscht. Im übrigen schlage ich folgende Namenskonvention vor:

Wichtigste ID - Quelle - Genaueres Das wäre dann z.B.:
NGC_0123_ESO.jpg
NGC 123 von ESO, Monitorgröße
NGC_0123_ESO_XXL.jpg
NGC 123 von ESO, sehr groß (HiRes)
NGC_0123_2MASS.jpg
2MASS-Bild
MESSIER_009_HST.jpg
Messier 9, vom HST, Monitorgröße
NGC_1234_GALEX.jpg
Ein GALEX-Bild von NGC 1234

Auf diese Weise sind Bilder vom gleichen Objekt alphabetisch benachbart. Bei mir hat sich das bewährt. Ich habe z.B. in meinem Verzeichnis auf meiner HDD alle Bilder eines Objekts beisammen gelistet. Sollen wir es gemeinsam so machen ? Cäsium137 (T.) 11:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Deprecated LicenseEdit

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


It has been found that Image:GreatDarkHorse Nebulae.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted! Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 21:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)


File:NGC2976-hst-R814G606B475.jpgEdit

 
File:NGC2976-hst-R814G606B475.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tryphon 14:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


File:NGC_3627_or_M66.jpgEdit

 
File:NGC_3627_or_M66.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tryphon 13:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Simeiz_RT-22_telescope_(2005-09-286)_.jpgEdit

 
File:Simeiz_RT-22_telescope_(2005-09-286)_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zukaz (talk) 09:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpgEdit

 
File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Featured Picture NominationEdit

The image File:Irregular_Galaxy_NGC_55_(ESO_0914a).jpg, which was produced or uploaded by you, has been nominated forfeatured picture status at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set:NGC 300 by ESO. Good luck! Béria Lima msg 20:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Byurakan.jpgEdit

 
File:Byurakan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 12:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

File:NGC121-HST-R814GB555 img.jpgEdit

Mistake with NGC 214Edit

Hi, the file uploaded by you (NGC 214 folder): NGC214-hst-R814G606B435.jpg is definitely not showing NGC 214 but NGC 201. You can check it HERE for example. However I'm not sure about the 2nd picture from the same folder: NGC201-hst-R190G606B160.jpg because it's not good quality, different filters have been used and not entire galaxy is shown. Can you check both files please, rename if necessary and move to correct folder to avoid confusion? Greetings, and thanks for uploading so many Hubble pictures :) Pikador (talk) 17:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for spotting this. I've cleaned it up according your suggestion and created a new picture of NGC 214: File:NGC 214 hst 08597 05 G606.png and corrected the links int he different wikis.
Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 10:37, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for this, keep up good work :) Pikador (talk) 17:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

NGC 2174Edit

Hi. Most pictures in Category:NGC 2174: for example Heic1406a.tif and NGC 2174.tiff (renamed today into Fragment of NGC 2175.tiff) are actually parts of NGC 2175 and not NGC 2174. Hubble site made mistake with description and many sites (APOD) have the same mistake. Correct identification (NGC 2174 and NGC 2175) is here and here. NGC 2175 is big nebulae while NGC 2174 is just small fragment of NGC 2175 but different than fragment shown on these pictures.

I made screenshot of NGC 2175. NGC 2174 is on top in white square, while on bottom it is a fragment which is shown on Hubble pictures. Maybe you could modify this picture: Heic1406d-crop.png (or add this picture to Commons: http://www.spacetelescope.org/static/archives/images/screen/heic1406b.jpg where NGC 2174 is visible better - its stars are much brighter on this picture) to show the real NGC 2174 - maybe just use square or circle and insert NGC 2174 inscription?

Best regards Pikador (talk) 08:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Hi, could you reply to this? Pikador (talk) 10:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
I do not have made further investigations - feel free to correct it, if there is a mistake. --11:56, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

File:NGC 4100 HST 9788 R658nB814.pngEdit

Hi, Hubble photos are not licensed under cc-by, can you add the correct license tag please. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, what is the correct license tag in your opinion? BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

{{PD-USGov-NASA}}? --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Gilt das denn nicht nur für berufliche Arbeiten von US-Regierungsangestellten / NASA-Angestellten? VG --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

... ein Gegenbeispiel findest Du unter: http://www.spacetelescope.org/copyright/ VG, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Opo0210b.tifEdit

 
File:Opo0210b.tif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 02:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

File:The remnant of the supernova SN 1006 seen at many different wavelengths.tiffEdit

 
File:The remnant of the supernova SN 1006 seen at many different wavelengths.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 02:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Request to add a pictureEdit

I can see you add a lot of pictures from Mount Lemmon Sky Center. As you have so much experience in adding pictures to Commons could you please add another one? http://skycenter.arizona.edu/gallery/Nebulae/NGC6590

There are 3 NGC/IC objects on this picture: big red nebula is IC 1284, small blue left - NGC 6595 (alternative name NGC 6590, it's nebula with open cluster), small blue right - NGC 6589. Identification according to http://cseligman.com/text/atlas.htm , The NGC/IC Project, Wolfgang Steinicke.

Greetings, Pikador (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

File:N6590s.jpg Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 19:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't see that :) So now it looks german wiki has separate articles for NGC 6590 and NGC 6595, according to most of sources it's the same object (duplicate entry in NGC catalog). Pikador (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi again, another request from me :) Please add recently published HST picture of NGC 7714. Thanks in advance. Pikador (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Heic1503a.tif - BR, --13:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

File:NGC 6393 hst 05479 606.pngEdit

Hi, the galaxy on this picture is usually identified as NGC 6394 (by modern sources), although there is some confusion with identification due to historical reasons (Swift's positions of NGC 6393 and NGC 6394 discovered by him on the same night are not exact) and some sources incorrectly identify these galaxies reversely. Anyway this galaxy is described here. You can also check positions at Hubble Legacy Archive (which correctly identified this galaxy as NGC 6394), SEDS.org, NGC/IC Project to confirm identification. So this file should be renamed. Greetings. Pikador (talk) 09:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

I've checked simbad and wikisky and tr:wikipedia - so I am unsure. I you like to fix it, go ahead but keep all wikis aligned. BR, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Both SIMBAD an WikiSky got it wrong (it's not unusual, they have many errors). SIMBAD has two different entries - NGC 6393 and NGC 6394 although they both show the same galaxy. Almost all wikis NGC articles made by bots are based on SEDS Revised NGC and IC Catalog and galaxy shown on your Hubble picture is identified as NGC 6394 there. This identification seems reasonable since description in NGC catalogue says NGC 6394 is northern and NGC 6393 southern (Wikisky has wrong reversed identification). So your today NGC 6393 article on german wiki is wrong too and it is describing NGC 6394 actually. NGC 6393 picture is here. NASA/IPAC EXTRAGALACTIC DATABASE has correct identificacion too. Pikador (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:IC356.jpgEdit

 
File:IC356.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

189.25.205.2 01:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Paardenkopnevel.jpgEdit

 
File:Paardenkopnevel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Herbig-Haro 46-47 - Eso1336a.tifEdit

 
File:Herbig-Haro 46-47 - Eso1336a.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

C messier (talk) 09:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Dear Fabian RRRR,
can you please upload a composite image for NGC 7552 from mast archive. Thank you in advance. --C messier (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

SDSS imagesEdit

Hi, I'd like to inform you, that Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) changed their image use policy recently. See discussion here and here. Since you uploaded many HST images I thought it would be good to let you know about this. Older DSS survey is another story, those images are still copyrighted. Greetings Pikador (talk) 08:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Pikador,
thanks for the information. This are very good news. The quality of the sdss images is big improvement over other free surveys.
Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 05:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for adding images. I noticed you added a wrong image of NGC 4. In fact NGC 4 looks more like an edge-on spiral galaxy, see here. It used to be identified as PGC 620 (this is the galaxy on your image) by some databases, like SIMBAD, but almost all of them already corrected that error (including SIMBAD). There are many discrepancies in astronomical databases concerning identification of NGC/IC objects due to poor data and many errors in original NGC/IC catalogues. Prof. Seligman is updating his database very often in cooperation with other astronomers and I think his site is best source for identification at the moment. Also Mr Wolfgang Steinicke is working on identification of NGC/IC objects, but his database is just Excel file with basic info. So before adding any image to commons better check in different sources (Seligman, SIMBAD, NED) if this is the correct object. Sometimes if identification of an object is doubtful better use PGC number in case of galaxies to avoid confusion. Greetings, and keep up a good work. Pikador (talk) 08:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting this. I've corrected the image. Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
  • I found NGC 296 article on German wiki is total mess - because of misidentification in SIMBAD it mixes data from 2 different galaxies. I also renamed NGC296 - SDSS DR14.png image because it points to that misidentified galaxy. Correct PGC number is PGC 3260 and correct image is NGC 0296 SDSS.jpg. Can you correct that article? See prof. Seligman's site for more details. Pikador (talk) 09:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

File:NGC328 - SDSS DR14.pngEdit

 
File:NGC328 - SDSS DR14.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pikador (talk) 14:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

File:NGC1270 - HST 814.pngEdit

 
Example of an dust torus around the center of an elliptical galaxy
 
NGC 4261

Can you check if NGC number of this galaxy is correct? I checked in Hubble Legacy Archive, but I see that NGC 1270 looks like elliptical, not similar to your image. It is disc galaxy on your image. Pikador (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Pikador,
It's a feature around the core of some (or all?) elliptical galaxies. It can be seen by darkening the image.
Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 08:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

HST images of Messier objectsEdit

Recently NASA released a set of images of objects from Messier Catalogue taken by Hubble Space Telescope. We already have many HST images of Messier objects on Commons, but in some cases these new ones are better, for example Messier 105. Here is an adress. Can you check it and upload to Commons some good quality images? Best regards Pikador (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:NGC 1936 & 1935.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

File:NGC1749 - SDSS DR14.pngEdit

NGC 1749 is a star cluster in Large Magellanic Cloud, so I suspect you made a typo in that name, but I don't know which galaxy is on the picture. Pikador (talk) 11:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)* I've got it - it's a NGC 1740, requesting rename. Pikador (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

File:NGC2603 - SDSS DR14.pngEdit

Actually this is NGC 2606 although some sites (including SIMBAD) call it NGC 2603. See prof. Seligman's page. Pikador (talk) 09:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

File:NGC3265 - SDSS DR14.pngEdit

It's a wrong picture, it's a spiral galaxy on it while NGC 3265 is a lenticular galaxy, see SIMBAD. Pikador (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

fixed, thanks - not sure, whats happend there --Fabian RRRR (talk) 10:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

File:NGC3436 - SDSS DR14.pngEdit

It's an incorrect picture. Most catalogues identify NGC 3436 as PGC 32633 (CGCG 038-039) (http://spider.seds.org/ngc/revngcic.cgi?NGC+3436 http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/nph-objsearch?objname=NGC+3436 http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr/ledacat.cgi?o=ngc%203436) and according to Harold Corwin (http://haroldcorwin.net/ngcic/ngcnotes.all) this identification is certain because discoverer left a sketch which clearly points to that galaxy. SIMBAD incorrectly identifies NGC 3436 as PGC 31905 which is also different galaxy than the one on your picture. Pikador (talk) 07:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

thanks for rechecking - I'll fix it. BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!Edit

  Thank you for your contribution at NGC 3199. Keep going! Jmencisom (talk) 00:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Can you help upload the picture to NGC 5929Edit

It seems like your really good with these types of photos and copyright. I am not. I found this photo of NGC 5929/5930 on this Wikipedia. I tried uploading it myself and I've tried getting everything down but it's still not working. Can you please help me upload it. Thanks.

AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC) https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datoteka%3ANGC5929-SDSS.gif lso its from the SDSS

Oops the title is supposed to be can you help me upload the picture OF NGC 5929. Sorry AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 03:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

I am planing to do a bigger upload, all NGC and IC objects from SDSS DR14 wih a scriped upload. BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 21:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Cool, Any chance you could know when this scripted upload is going to happen. Thanks, Adrian AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Davidedemartin 3.jpgEdit

 
File:Davidedemartin 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

C messier (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

SDSS DR15Edit

SDSS has issued Data Release 15 (DR 15) last month. I don't know if it improves image quality or extends sky coverage (probably not) but as it is latest revision I think you should check it. Greetings and thanks for your uploads Pikador (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

SDSS DR14Edit

Hello.
What mean colors in the images? It should be documented.

As a note of secondary importance, licensing should be specified via templates. Pushing such details as Email addresses of persons into file description pages directly is inappropriate. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi,
most of astronomical images are false color. Details can be found here: https://www.sdss.org/dr14/imaging/jpg-images-on-skyserver/
I am not shure whether it is a star or Halpha region.
I can change the text for future uploads, please make a suggestion.
If you provide a template, I can include it - the email results from a citation of the web site.
BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi again,
added an explanation and a template.
What to do with the already uploaded files?
BR, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Good, with this legend. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for {{SDSS DR14}}. Sorry for not being in touch – I spent my today Commons edits for various quarrels. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

v:File:Camera filters-300x274.pngEdit

Hi Fabian RRRR!

I tried to upload v:File:Camera filters-300x274.png to File:SDSS Camera filters for JPG -300x274.png but Special:UploadWizard would not allow it claiming the two are identical which they are not. The Wikiversity version is an updated version which includes the ultraviolet band on the far left and the Z band on the far right. Suggestions welcome! --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Camera filters-300x274.jpg
BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Good idea! --Marshallsumter (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

File:NGC3606 - SDSS DR14.jpgEdit

I don't think a galaxy on this image is NGC 3606. This area of the sky is not covered by SDSS yet and the image doesn't fit DSS image of NGC 3606 (http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=NGC+3606). Probably it's a typo, pls check it. Pikador (talk) 07:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting this error, it is 3607. Not sure, what happens here, i used a program. Anyway, I‘ve fixed it. Pls notify me, if you see further mistakes.
BR —-Fabian RRRR (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

NGC 387Edit

I know you are currently uploading 2 types of SDSS images. The galaxy and its surroundings (and with labels). And the zoomed in version and no labels. Can you please upload the one without labels and zoomed in of NGC 387] as the only one available is with. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:NGC_387 AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 17:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Simbad didn't know the galaxy. https://cseligman.com/text/atlas/ngc3a.htm says it's PGC 3987, so i put it under this name.
The images with labels are not from me.
BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Fabian RRRR".