User talk:FlickreviewR/archive3

marking FlickrLickr uploads for invalid licenses edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I was on the Bad Old Ones tool and noted several images like Image:Geese 3.jpg that had been uploaded by User:FlickrLickr and subsequently marked by FlickreviewR for deletion with incompatible licensing. Isn't it the case that every FlickrLickr upload must have been under a valid license at one point? In that case, it would be much more helpful if FlickreviewR could check to see if FlickrLickr was the uploader and use a approval tag like the Flickr review tag. I deleted several images before realizing what the uploader was and backing up to restore, but I won't use the Bad Old Ones tool if it requires me to check every image before deletion to see the uploader. Thanks, Banyan Tree 07:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Be Good Tanyas 2.JPG edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm a little confused by this edit, since as far as I can tell the image I'd uploaded before was already the original image from Flickr, and was indistinguishable from what's there now. Was I doing something wrong? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

You uploaded a low resolution version of the image. If you are at the image page on Flickr, there is an "All Sizes" link. If you go there you can get the highest resolution available. As Commons always prefers the highest resolution available, the bot uploaded that for you. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please review the image ive recently uploaded from Flickr it is found in Angel Locsin article the image is Angel Locsin.jpg Thankyou 222.127.26.41 08:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello can you review this image edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This image was from Flickr heres the link [1] Thankyou 222.127.26.41 11:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

License change(?) of cleared image edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you re-check whether this Image:Pink Floyd Pig.jpg was really not NC licensed at review time, because now it is.(see Image talk:Pink Floyd Pig.jpg) --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

If the bot has posted on the image page that the image was freely licensed, then it really was freely licensed. So it was indeed cc-by-2.0 licensed. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please help me edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, recently you checked and vetted this picture. I was wondering if you could do the same for this picture and crop it? I am the main contributor to the Michael Jackson article at wikipedia and it is nearly at featured standard. We really need a free picture of Jackson with a lighter skin tone for the article, something that is missing at the moment. I was hoping you could crop and possibly enlarge that purple flag with a picture of Jackson on it so that I could use it on wikipedia. I could really do with your help on this as I cannot understand picture policy. I work under the same user name at wikipedia so if you want to contact me there you can. I appreciate any help you can offer, please help me. Realist2 (talk) 16:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could you also make a decision as to whether this picture should really be on commons. If it is allowed it would be amazing for the article, I will not include it until it has been vetted. I'm inclined to believe it is legitimate. The auther also has an account on wikipedia which he hardly ever uses seen here. Interestingly, despite uploading this picture up onto commons he has NEVER edited a Michael Jackson related article on wikipedia. This indicates to me that he didn't have an agenda to get it onto the article when he uploaded it. Realist2 (talk) 16:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

This user is a bot, so it can not upload images by himself ;) However, as the image is freely licensed, you can use the Flickr upload bot tool to upload the image to Commons. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Pink_Floyd_Pig.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Pink_Floyd_Pig.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

dave pape (talk) 14:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Israeli_bombing_in_Baalbek.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Israeli_bombing_in_Baalbek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wayiran (talk) 09:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Lronbusted.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Lronbusted.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RockMFR (talk) 01:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:French_consulate_in_St_Petersburg.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:French_consulate_in_St_Petersburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Russavia (talk) 22:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Slovak_Consulate_in_St_Petersburg.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Slovak_Consulate_in_St_Petersburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Russavia (talk) 22:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Michael_Phelps_Athens.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Michael_Phelps_Athens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

76.175.162.28 07:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Retouched images edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There appears to be a problem with the bot or the tool that uploads retouched images. It marks retouched images from flicker and those that have been uploaded with the special retouch tool as having no source. The original commons file is in the summary box and the original file contains the flickr sources. See Image:White-fronted Amazon (Amazona albifrons) -tree-3c.jpg for one such place where this error occurred. It might be helpful if the two bots talked to each other. Snowmanradio (talk) 08:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:United_Gate_Info.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:United_Gate_Info.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

24.18.46.102 06:20, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please is a mistake edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please how i can change the information of the images of this image IBO2 please and these IBO I don`t want have problems so plese if somebody can change the information i will be grateful. --Kevinmcrgd (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:The_Beatles_in_Nevada.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:The_Beatles_in_Nevada.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

dave pape (talk) 16:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:The_Beatles_Draw_Image.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:The_Beatles_Draw_Image.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

dave pape (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:33383056_85f19fa928.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:33383056_85f19fa928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-Nard the Bard 13:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Dom_Perignon_Bottle.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Dom_Perignon_Bottle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kimse (talk) 03:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bronze_Saite_era_piece_of_Egyptian_cat_in_the_Gulbenkina_Museum1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Bronze_Saite_era_piece_of_Egyptian_cat_in_the_Gulbenkina_Museum1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 23:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Il Gesu Facade.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I wonder why the flickrbot could not find this image. It is still available here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/97607362@N00/2333653632/ and it is licensed as cc-by-2.0 --Kurpfalzbilder.de (talk) 20:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Charlie Sheen Flickr image edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I notice this image Image:Charlie Sheen by M Foster.jpg has been checked as meeting the terms of creative commons, but when I looked at the website it has a "all rights reserved" copyright tag. I'm not sure if this is an error. Rossrs (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Sexy_model_wearing_japanese_school_uniform.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Sexy_model_wearing_japanese_school_uniform.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

24.9.75.153 22:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Carla_Bruni-Sarkozy.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Carla_Bruni-Sarkozy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lupo 07:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ford_2009_F150.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Ford_2009_F150.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sterkebaktalk 16:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:525964967_6fd40c362b.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:525964967_6fd40c362b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tabercil (talk) 22:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Phonebook DNA.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Phonebook DNA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ferrari_logo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Ferrari_logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 16:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:153334113_e86cbbd819.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:153334113_e86cbbd819.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guérin Nicolas ^(messages) 00:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Roma-Foro_di_Cesare_Map.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Roma-Foro_di_Cesare_Map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Editing without image edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, can you review these files because you edited without image:

Thank you, --Tiptop (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Euphonia violacea.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I found this image on Flickr : See here. LICENSE : I don't understand what's wrong ?! Totodu74 (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

See also this for this picture
See also this for this picture
See also this for this picture

Image:Bleeding.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Bleeding.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Philip_Newth_and_robot..jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Philip_Newth_and_robot..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Kevin Spacey @ San Diego Comic-Con 2008 .jpg : Double uploading by FlickreviewR edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Because I didn't upload the largest image from [2], FlickreviewR uploaded a new version of the file: ok. But, 2 hours later, FlickreviewR uploaded the same file one more time. I think there is a problem. --CHristoPHE 17:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

And now, a third time. --CHristoPHE 17:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sure this is related... on this image: Image:Eva Longoria-2008.jpg the original author uploaded a small version. When I reviewed the image on flicker I uploaded the largest version... Then "FlickreviewR" came behind me and re-uploaded the same version. J.smith (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wierd... flickereview removed my deletion tag and removed my review[3] on this image: Image:Mgmt.jpg. J.smith (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Rally_Menu.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Rally_Menu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Xuxa.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Xuxa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Takoyaki_poster_in_San_Francisco's_Japantown.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Takoyaki_poster_in_San_Francisco's_Japantown.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 21:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:SANY1606.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:SANY1606.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:SANY1565.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:SANY1565.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:James_Edward_Murphy.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:James_Edward_Murphy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Buste_Alberto_Santos_Dumont.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Buste_Alberto_Santos_Dumont.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 00:23, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Mexico_moord_Oaxaca_is_overal.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Mexico_moord_Oaxaca_is_overal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Emmy_Awards_Tickets.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Emmy_Awards_Tickets.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Orlando_Power_Station_Towers.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Orlando_Power_Station_Towers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 19:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Cremona01_flick.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Cremona01_flick.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Me!.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Me!.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Nicolegraves.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Nicolegraves.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

How do you turn this on (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:RuddWins.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:RuddWins.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bidgee (talk) 13:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

License recognition bug? edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The bot seems to be misreading the licenses on certain images. For example File:Juno Reactor at Earthcore 01.jpg where under the cc-by-sa-2.0 template it has put "...licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0, which is compatible with the Commons. It is however not the same license as given above..." which is clearly contradictory. Ikara (talk) 01:44, 13 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

A quick look at the contributions for the bot suggest that ALL images are being tagged as Passed_Changed (if they pass) regardless of whether the licenses match. This is going to pile up very quickly, please fix it. Ikara (talk) 02:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:เลย์.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File deletion warning

File:เลย์.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:John_Rinaldi_at_the_AIDS_Project_Los_Angeles_(APLA)_benefit.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

File deletion warning

File:John_Rinaldi_at_the_AIDS_Project_Los_Angeles_(APLA)_benefit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Peregrine Fisher (talk) 00:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Sirizinhababy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

~/w^/Talk 18:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Isla_Alejadro_Selkirk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cameta (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Femalebody_bottom_nude.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Femalebody_bottom_nude.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

smial (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Mótmæli vörubílstjóra 1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Flickr users may change the license at any time which is the point of the Flickr review system. If the bot reviewed it as being under a free license then it was under a free license at the time of review. --Yarnalgo (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Marahon shoes.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to you review, I have corrected the source information, including source author and link. Please cancel the warning, thanks. This image is illustrated to the Chinese Wikipedia page: Marathon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoulas (talk • contribs) 17:03, April 9, 2009 (UTC)

Done --Yarnalgo (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Yunquera.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I uploaded a highzer resoluted version of the original upload file. 11 minutes later the FlickreviewR-Bot uploaded a new version with the same resolution. This is an unnecessary drawdown of commons-server capabilities. How can that happen? --High Contrast (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Aras_as_uachtarain.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This file is incorrectly named. Aras_as_uachtarain should be Aras_an_uachtarain. No one will be searching for this picture using as can you fix this please? http://jaqian.co.nr (talk) 08:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bug? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php? title=File:HMAS_Canberra_1930s.jpg&diff=20441014&oldid=20440960] - why is the bot tagging it when there is {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}} on it? —Ed 17 ^(Talk) 00:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is not a bug, it just doesn't recognize that license. This is a real issue; what it should do is replace the {{Flickrreview}} template with {{Flickrreview/human}} if it finds a no known copyright restrictions image. --Yarnalgo (talk) 02:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Many Pictures are not from Flickr edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are many picture which have nothing to do with flickr: fore example File:Anhso.net_2020_19420092298999_l.jpg or often OpenStreetmaps like File:Washington_Park_map.png in most pictures in the group: Category:Unsourced_Flickr_images_reviewed_by_FlickreviewR is nowhere the word flickr.

Why was in this pictures the tag {{flickrreview}}? In the history of these files I don't find anything why and how this tag came into these files. There is allway the edit from flickrreview to User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-nosource by User:FlickreviewR Can somebody explaine this? Thanks for your help. HBR (talk) 22:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

image re-review edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Greetings. i fixed the licence on this image: File:Emma Watson, Press Conference, June 2007.jpg and i wanted to ask you to review it again please. cheers.--Lykantrop (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

FlickrLickr edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please see Commons:Village pump#FlickrLickr, where I have asked about the bot adding images uploaded by FlickLickr to Category:Possibly unfree Flickr images reviewed by FlickreviewR. I wonder if FlickreviewR's code needs to be changed so it doesn't tag FlickLickr's uploads? WJBscribe (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

PD-USGov and PD-USGov-POTUS templates edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Recently the Official White House photostream on Flickr changed its license from CC-by to United States Government Work. FlickReviewR does not recognize that license, despite it is equivalent to {{PD-USGov}} or {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Lobo (howl?) 19:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC) P.D:Sorry for my EnglishReply

One month later, same problem. --Dereckson (talk) 02:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just a piece of advice: If uploading from the White House's photostream just do not put a {{Flickrreview}} template on the page. The point of the Flickr review system is that Flickr users can change licenses with no history of previous licenses so it is to confirm that it was under a free license in case they change in the future. This does not apply to this special case where they will not change so you can just not put a {{Flickrreview}} template. --Yarnalgo (talk) 16:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pictures from Flickr now have acceptable license edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following images were marked as non-free images recently by your bot, but I recently got the author of them at flickr (i.e. drs2biz) to place them under a free Share Alike license. I would like you to now fix them, please.

Thank you.--PericlesofAthens (talk) 09:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done --Yarnalgo (talk) 19:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Yarnalgo!--PericlesofAthens (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

David Jay image edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Davidjayasexuals.jpg I believe that this image is free to use despite the source not being found. Spiderone (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

No known copyright restrictions edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bot fail: [4]. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 16:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've sent an email to Brian, and he fixed that. --Yuval Y § Chat § 19:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Note from Christioph Wagener edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You wrote, the pictures has been reviewed on 12:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC) by FlickreviewR, who could not determine what the source image from Flickr was. That is not possible.

Please check the following pictures:

File:San Massimiliano Kolbe Varese 6.jpg
File:San Massimiliano Kolbe Varese 5.jpg
File:San Massimiliano Kolbe Varese 4.jpg
File:San Massimiliano Kolbe Varese 3.jpg
File:San Massimiliano Kolbe Varese 2.jpg
File:San Massimiliano Kolbe Varese 1.jpg

--Christoph Wagener (talk) 15:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image in upright postion edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey FlickreviewR (section), don't know if I'm in right channel but need to place the following image that was recently reviewed (on 18:25, 8 September 2009): in vertical position, how its this done? tried several times with no avail, please someone help, sincerely ∞ Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Guisset edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can I get some help to see whether this image can be used or not. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guisset.jpg Lando09 (talk) 12:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Acis ionica flower.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Dears,

I am a little bit amazed by the following.

This image recently uploaded image was originally posted to Flickr by od0man at http://flickr.com/photos/15121707@N00/3373053934. It has been reviewed on 12:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC) by FlickreviewR, who found it to be licensed under the terms of the All Rights Reserved, which isn't compatible with the Commons. It is unknown whether the license above was ever valid. If this image was recently uploaded, it may be speedy deleted.

It's the first time I am uploading a picture someone else has put on Flickr. I have the written agreement of od0man to put it on wikemedia. I have apparently chosen a wrong licence. Please let me know which licence should be used to make it acceptable for Commons.

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 12:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have originally found this nice picture on Flickr. I have contacted the author od0man -alias Steve Covey- asking him whethter he allowed me to upload it to Commons. See hereafter the written authorization he has sent to me toghether with the picture in original size.

Dear Réginald,

attached is the original image. [I also have just taken some shots of Cyclamen rohlfsianum that I grew from seed in 1995 and has only just flowered for the first time this year!!]

I hereby give my permission for Réginald Hulhoven (alias Meneerke bloem on Wikipedia) to upload the attached image on my behalf.

Best Wishes,

Steve Covey. [VC7/8]

http://www.wiltshiredragonflies.org.uk

http://www.wildlife-galleries.co.uk/

http://wiltshire-dragonfly-news.blogspot.com/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/15121707@N00/

I infer from his message that there is no copyright on the file I have uploaded on Commons.

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 14:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:TVR 3000 1978.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This bot has set a notice stating that it could not determine what the source image from Flickr was. I have meanwhile entered the source link here. I hope that is sufficient.
Yours, Ciciban (talk) 09:51, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

photo edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is the license that the picture then? I'm trying to do weeks put the picture which is the license that I place. I don't want that picture is dropped for the fourth time. Please! --Pedu0303 (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:MiniMundo.jpg File:Chico_Buarque.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, the flicker user just change the licence of those photos File:MiniMundo.jpg File:Chico_Buarque.jpg. Now is not a free licence photo. What to do? Mvdiogo (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Don't you check for Commons:Questionable Flickr images? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi FlickreviewR, when reviewing a Flickr-source image/upload, don't you check for the acount name on Commons:Questionable Flickr images? Otherwise, you might have noted that File:24-Season-7-Promotional-Photos.jpg comes from an account that is already listed on QFI. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Lion and Sun Emblem.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please delete this image. I misread its license on Flicker. It is clearly a copy-right picture--WIMYV (talk) 18:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not recognizing PD-gov on FlickR edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone explain this diff to me? This seems like it should be easily recognized as PD.--Chaser (talk) 21:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:LutherBaucom&ReidSummey.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Jubilee Hall - Seton Hall.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please see the talk page for that photo. Peteycat (talk) 12:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Humedales edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear FlickreviewR, I did't understand your message. I didn´t got the pictures from Flickr. I got them from BogoWiki and they licesce of the website said they are in public domain. Pls check following link about the information of public domain "Todo el contenido en este sitio wiki se encuentra en el dominio público".

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Capella_pan_part.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Humedal_de_la_conejera.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Humedal_tibabuyes.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burro_part.jpg}

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Humedal_de_C%C3%B3rdoba.jpg

Regards, edwod2001 --Edwod2001 (talk) 23:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kim Saigh 01.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Wait, I requested a new licence, if it on't be gotten withing two days, you can delete that. --Eino81^keskustelu 13:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Now we have got the right licence! --Eino81^keskustelu

16:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re-review request edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! The two photos listed below were reviewed by FlickreviewR who "could not determine what the source image from Flickr was.". I figure this is because I forgot to enter the link to the photos on flickr. I have now entered the link to the pictures on flickr (under "source" in the image page). How do I get them re-reviewed?
The images:

File:Ultimate being played - Sky 01.jpg ; and the image on flickr (link)
File:Ultimate being played - The Force 01.jpg ; and the image on flickr (link)

Thanks! Dlivnat (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Medellin 2010 - Estructura Estadio.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pls kindly check the information posted for about photo. The Author authorize to use the photo under the license CC-BY-SA --Edwod2001 (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:IslamicJihadRockets.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:IslamicJihadRockets.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Sean.hoyland (talk) 04:29, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Famiglia Antonio Bernocchi.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Famiglia Antonio Bernocchi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 22:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please Review edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you please add your reviewer tag to this image File:HenneyChoi4066693970_4e6ceda5f1_o.jpg? I didn't realize there was another section for uploading Flickr images. Thanks. Wetcloth20 (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Wichita_NIAR.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I want to upload few images from Flickr to Wichita State University article on Wikipedia, i have seen you helping others out by sorting out the licenses and speedy deletion problem. I recently uploaded this image, which is now tagged as a speedy deletion work tough i have given the source and further explanation, can you please help me with this as soon as possible. Regards! SyedNaqvi90 (talk) 09:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

bug in review bot edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See this edit. The bot has added the review information twice, because the licence was accidentally added twice. Snowmanradio (talk) 21:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

New check edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please check the new information File:Staromestsky orloj detail 1.jpg and File:Prazsky orloj celkovy pohled.jpg. Conversion tool incorrectly added a "#" instead of dot "." --Hapesoft (talk) 07:50, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

http://www.flickr.com/photos/22342927@N04/4412220738/ edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would be grateful if you could revisit this as the originator has said that she would change the license. Thanks

Weglinde (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

date format edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could the bot provide the date of its review using ISO format ? It allow automatic translation.--Zolo (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

no funciona edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

pero si hay archivos en flirck que estab bajo la licencia Compartir Igual porque no son aprobadas en commons al subirlas?a menos que la informacion no sea valida .quisiera saber si podrias decirme como puedo subir archivos de flirck que este bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 para que las apruebes --190.87.108.227 22:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bug/question edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How come that the bot doesn't recognize correclty functioning Flickr URL's such as [5] at File:Fort Worden Kinzie.jpg? Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 05:56, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

About the pic "File:Franco at the 826 Valencia fundraiser.jpg" edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there! I am fairly new to Wiki Commons (but I am a frequent user on the regular Wiki site). When I uploaded the pic entitled "File:Franco at the 826 Valencia fundraiser.jpg" (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Franco_at_the_826_Valencia_fundraiser.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D) from Flickr I forgot to add the url link to the actual picture from the author in the description box. I have since realized the mistake and corrected it. Could you please re-review it? Thanks! Crystal Clear x3 (talk) 05:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

BiBi Dieppe.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you please check the license of this file? Thank you! Aliesperet (talk) 19:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Missouri-flood1.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why is this file getting a flickr review? At no point was it mentioned as a flickr file. Americasroof (talk) 01:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have had the same problem with every photo I have uploaded with the new uploader. For some reason, they are all tagged for Flickr review.--NortyNort (talk) 09:29, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

for the bot programmers edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you add to the Flickr-review-bot a function that compares the author name or Flickr username to the Author entry on the image page on Commons? Today I discovered a Commons user who had uploaded images from other people's Flickr account and put his own username in the author entry (legally this would be copyfraud or similar). Thereafter the Flickr-review-bot correctly identified/approved the license, but did not discover the wrong author entry[6]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orton_fx-es.png edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Where is the source of the image file:Orton_fx-es.png in flickr, when the original source is explained in the description of the image?

faelomx (talk) 03:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File: Scooter Braun.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you explain why he sent a new version of File: Scooter Braun.jpg whole pie and not let the previous one? Danny Adam (talk) 00:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:USS Chikaskia Change of Command 1964.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

FlickrevieweR added a comment to this image stating "could not determine what the source image from Flickr was." I obtained the photo from navsource.org and believe the image is public domain based on info from that site. Do I need an admin to review and approve the image? The big red "X" in the FlickrevieweR comment seems to be a bad indication, but I am uncertain what needs to be done. Thanks! Skeet Shooter (talk) 12:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Universidad Laboral de Alcalá de Henares edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello!

En la imagen "File:Universidad Laboral de Alcalá de Henares, años 60.jpg" indicas que no es compatible con Commons. Sin embargo, en la página web de la imagen en Flickr [7] dice textualmente que "Todos los tamaños de esta fotografía están disponibles bajo una licencia Creative Commons". Por favor, te ruego que reevalues tú decisión de borrarla y permitas que continue dicha fotografía en Wikimedia Commons. Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

UserName33432 Hello please do not remove this image File:Gaby espino22321.jpg

Pixie Lott pictures edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you please review these files of English singer Pixie Lott:

Lucas RdS (talk) 22:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:RicardoSanz.jpg + File:Pilar gomez acebo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

With respect to these files, http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:RicardoSanz.jpg , http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Pilar_gomez_acebo.jpg please note THEY ARE NO LONGER IN FLICKR (if they ever were) and THEY HAVE NO LICENSE, PLEASE REMOVE THEM IMMEDIATELY and STOP USING A NON-EXISTANT FLICKR ADDRESS. THANK YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.222.81.148 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 18 September 2011

This anonIP editor made the same requests on my talk page and I have replied that the licences were proper at the time of upload and explained that the licences are not revocable. I have again reverted their refactoring of the image details. Ww2censor (talk) 16:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Fireboat Howard T. Teppesent in the Houston Channel -a.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not sure what the bot did on that file. It doesn't have a license tag on the file description page. -- Docu at 20:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Britney Spears edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I change the source of the photos and made the right corrections. --Asj wichi (talk) 00:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Zapote Line blockhouse locations.png edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I really don't understand this edit. As explained on the image talk page, I scanned the image in myself and posted it to Commons. If it was posted to Flikr, it was posted by someone else using an image copied from this one. Wtmitchell (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'd assume a bug in the upload wizard, placing a flickrreview tag on images not originating from Flickr. Or you hit a wrong button/source selection during the upload. --Denniss (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have the same issue with File:OH-Toledo 1932 Ref.jpg. This would seem to confirm a bug needing repair. BD2412 T 15:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I asked for help at Commons:Prototype upload wizard feedback - at least that's the best page I could find. --Denniss (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hilfe...!!!...??? edit

Türkçe: Sayın (FlickreviewR), ben artık alman vikipediye bilgi eklemeyeceğim çünkü hemen siliyorsunuz. Aslında ben almanca bilmem ne dediğinizi de anlamıyorum. Eğer bir eksiklik varsa siz tamamlayınız. Ben nasıl yaıplacağını bilmiyorum. Almanca vikipediye katkı yaptığım bazı çok eski ve bulunması zor olan belgeleri eklememe rağmen bazılarını kötü kalite resim diye siliniyor. Bazıları nı da kaynak gösterilmemiş diye siliniyor. Ben bir madalya'nın kaynağını nasıl göstereceğimi de bilmiyorum. çünkü madalya'yı ben satın aldım: bu durumda eksik olan kısımlarını siz doldurunuz ve bana yardımcı olunuz. Yoksa Vikinize artık katkı yapmayacağım..saygılarımla.

1975 Rheınstahl Medaillen

Almanca : Sehr geehrte (FlickreviewR), weil ich jetzt nur das Löschen des deutschen Wikipedias eklemeyeceğim Informationen. In der Tat, ich verstehe nicht, Deutsch zu wissen, was Sie sagen. Wenn Sie eine komplette Mangel haben. Ich weiß nicht, wie yaıplacağını. Ich habe auf Wikipedias in deutscher Sprache bei und es gibt einige sehr alte Dokumente, die schwierig sind für mich noch hinzufügen, dass obwohl einige der schlechten Bildqualität nachlässt. Einige, wie gezeigt erweitern in der Quelle schwindet. Ich weiß nicht, wie zu zeigen, die Quelle einer Auszeichnung wurde. Die Auszeichnung, weil ich gekauft: In diesem Fall und mir helfen, die fehlenden Teile, die Sie machen zu füllen. Oder sind Sie nicht zu Vikinize jetzt beitragen .. besten Grüßen. ^{tacirci 19:56, 28 Mart 2011}

Proper recognation of template-parameters edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not important: When using {{Flickrreview|1=user|2=date|3=|changed= }} the bot reports this to User:FlickreviewR/Images never editted by their reviewer while it should be aware of template-parameters. BTW there is a typo in the page-title (editted). But all in all thanks for the nice bot, Bryan. -- RE rillke questions? 08:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

No_Flickr_Link showing up for photos with a Flickr link edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I have just finished uploading some photos from Flickr (with a CC attribution license), with a link to the Flickr source page (or, to be precise, one of the three source pages - the others being linked as page 2 and page 3 off of the start page) in the Source field (and in one case in the Description), but FlickreviewR is claiming "No_Flickr_Link" for them. Please examine my contributions and http://www.flickr.com/photos/39965300@N07/sets/72157623426355225/detail/ for the photos and their source. Allens (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please Check This Image edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://www.flickr.com/photos/39347844@N07/3829654280/in/photostream

Please check if this image is copyrighted and therefore not suitable for use under Wikipedia. Thanks, 174.7.126.185 05:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

check edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SS501_jung_min.jpg --Meimeiyeh (talk) 11:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Source images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is Source image means? --Squidville1 (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

St Fagans National History Museum pics edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I uploaded six photos as a job lot today using the Upload Wizard, and your bot hasn't recognised the sources, because I gave as the source the Flickr set that included all six. Does this mean they're going to be deleted? I could provide the individual pages for the originals if necessary but am posting here first just to check, in case I don't need to go to the trouble of doing that. Ham (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

You have to link to the individual image page or the review fails. --Denniss (talk) 17:39, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re:File:Ravenna-sanvitale01.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This picture [8] has been misnamed San Vitale. It is actually Sant'Apollinare in Classe, which also has a category. See:[9]. There is another similar basilica, Sant'Apollinare Nuovo.

I don't know how to go about renaming a file. I observed that several years ago you had uploaded this from Flicker and thought you might know what to do.

Amandajm (talk) 07:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Mekenna Melvin edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, this is my second attempt and apparently I'm wrong or I'm not doing it correctly. Yet I did as it was explained, sorry. Is this what will be removed? --Skarock (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notify uploader of failed check edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! I recently accidentally uploaded an all rights reserved file from flickr and the bot noticed it. I then happened to take a look at the file and noticed the problem. Perhaps the bot could alert the uploader of the problem? After all, isn't he the most likely person to know what happened? Palosirkka (talk) 13:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please delete file: uploaded in error edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I thought I'd checked the suitable attributions but see that I made a mistake – I'm sorry. Thanks for deleting File:Salamanca Place, Hobart.jpg the file. Thanks for picking this up so promptly.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Files marked by bot edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How would the code handle images uploaded & marked by a bot that attributes another user? -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 03:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Just like someone adding a comment on a talk page but signing with a different name. --Denniss (talk) 14:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Template:Flickr-no known copyright restrictions edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Review bot does either not like or know how to correctly handle this tag, all images get a passed-changed review tag despite matching license. See [10]--Denniss (talk) 14:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Size not found error on cropped image edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Re: fail with size on found on File:Peter Warren Singer 2010.jpg I presume this is a validation error you are throwing when the sizes are not the same. So there is nothing I am doing wrong with my flickr link and the bot will always require a human verifier? J JMesserly (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

The bot can't identify an altered image thus it requires a human review. --Denniss (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Added the source edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just added the source of the image which i had recently uploaded [11]. Clarificationgiven (talk) 06:55, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

National Archives Flickr Account edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would it be possible to categorise all the images from this account with Category:Media_from_the_National_Archives_(United_Kingdom) ? I'd do it myself but I don't know how in bulk.

It's very useful for tracking purposes. I'm assuming duplicates weren't captured? --Mr impossible (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, can you review this image edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This image was from Flickr heres the link 1 Thankyou--JudithJunkers (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Be able to resolve raw Flickr image URLs to Flicker in-stream page URLs? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It would be nice if when the bot spots a raw Flickr image URL in the source, such as https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8126/8652704625_1ca447ecec_o.jpg, it could resolve that to the corresponding Flickr in-stream page that has all the metadata, such as licensing information (in the case of that example, the corresponding page is https://secure.flickr.com/photos/ioerror/8652704625/in/photostream). I don't know if the Flickr APIs offer a way to do this. However, if it were possible, it would avoid misunderstandings like this one. Thanks. Kfogel (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Consider adding text to the Bot heading edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'd suggest updating this bot's {{Bot}} heading, to make it even clearer how to reach the bot operator. To do so, add a text parameter that says something similar to the following:

text= <br/>As noted on [[User talk:Bryan|Bryan's talk page]] in July 2009, in case you need [to reach the FlickreviewR bot operator] {{green|Bryan should be '''contacted by email'''}} via [[Special:Emailuser/Bryan]].<br/><br/>

72.244.200.198 22:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

About unsourced images edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey FlickreviewR! I've seen that you categorized the images as "unsourced." I wanted to tell you that I didn't mean to send you directly to the photostream, I forgot to add the source that goes directly to the image itself! I've fixed the problem, so can you try to review the images again? OZODOR (talk) 20:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I usually just fix the image and then reset the bot. Just remove the bot error code and replace with {Fickrreview} It failed with the image below though.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rotate error edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I rotated File:A-maze-ing Laughter close 2013.jpg and then reset the bot after 'file size not found error'. The bot still failed to find the size though. Did I do something wrong? This has worked for me before, I think.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Urgent edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My friend! Unfortunately, some one are about to delete the personal image of Oscar Casares as you can see here. I've been asking for permits and pestering people with email from one side to the other... The Flickr page of Oscar Casares is Official, has more than 6 photographs (contrary to what is argued in the file for quick removal) and was created by his team with the objective of providing images under ShareAlike Creative Commons Attribution, as requested by Wikipedia. In this context, it is quite inconvenient erase Oscar Casares image. I ask for your help, because I do not know how to prevent this misunderstanding--António Lagos (talk) 00:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

@António, FlickreviewR is a bot. You are talking to a bot ;-) . --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Flickrwashing edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems that this bot is auto-flagging some Flickr accounts and images as Flickrwashed material, such as when I uploaded this one. However, I uploaded those images with permission from the author herself under her terms by using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 license to credit her. I also ran those images in Google Search by Image and TinEye to make sure they're the original, in which the search engines confirmed that they aren't laundered. All of those images also have their EXIF data to prove that they're legitimate. So did the bot flagged it? Something must be done for this. Chihciboy (talk) 06:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Same Flickr URL, different result edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Correct operation: at File:Debi Derryberry at 2012 Comic Con.jpg the bot correctly detected the image size and Flickr licensing, and correctly updated the page.
Incorrect operation: at File:Debi Derryberry at 2012 Comic Con cropped.jpg the bot did not detect the image size and Flickr licensing, and so updated the page with the error message, with the edit summary (FlickreviewR: size_not_found).

In each case, the Flickr image url was the same. I've emailed Bryan linking here. --Lexein (talk) 04:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

No need to email him, this is to be expected. You use the same URL with a different image (cropped), of course you get different result. Cases like this are manually handled by admins and trusted folk. So just sit tight and everything will be fine. Palosirkka (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks. I would have understood the error message immediately, and not bothered anyone about it, if it were
(FlickreviewR: size_not_matched) or (FlickreviewR: size_mismatch). "Not found" has a much different common meaning, when referring to files or EXIF data. --Lexein (talk) 18:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion to change behavior edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I see in histories of items modified by the bot that it first downloads the largest possible image from flickr and only thereafter confirms the license. (e.g. [12], [13]) I guess it would make more sense the other way around, perhaps that's what actually happens behind the scenes but if not...

So either change the order of things logged to histories if the backend already works logically or change the backend if it potentially does useless work (needlessly working the Wikimedia servers in case it downloads a large file only to notice it cannot be retained due to bad license).

Thanks for this great tool! Palosirkka (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Feature creep suggestion: Bad_dates_and_Flickr_metadata edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Perhaps we should add this function to FlickreviewR's duties? Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Bad_dates_and_Flickr_metadata Palosirkka (talk) 10:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nothing this Bot should do as the only purpose is to verify the license with the original image at Flickr. That's work for another Bot. --Denniss (talk) 11:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

FYI This bot also downloads the largest possible image from Flickr. I don't really have an opinion which bot should do what however. Palosirkka (talk) 12:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

please help me edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

HI, well, I see that u uploaded here an image of actor Sam Jaeger. I can't upload images. I don't understand license rules... I'm wondering if u could help me with this image ( http://www.gettyimages.it/detail/fotografie-di-cronaca/actor-sam-jaeger-enters-the-wireimage-portrait-fotografie-di-cronaca/159711848 ) ... if u can upload it on wikimedia i'll be very thankfully to you... I need it for the italian wikipedia page of the actor... thanks a lot however... bye and have a good day --2.33.22.241 14:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This account is a bot, but apart from that the photo can't be uploaded since it's not free ((c) Getty Images, 2013 Ray Tamarra). Trijnstel_talk 15:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, could you upload new pictures of Jessie J ? I'd appreciate it. Bye!JD3rulo (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Image sources edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Source for Dragan Djokanovic (2013).PNG is available on [14]. Hercegovac (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Licenses edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image Licenses

Hello, I read the label left in the images that came up recently and that they have the appropriate license in flckr, I ask you to check again the respective licensing of images Municipalidad de Esquipulas, Valle de Esquipulas, Palacio Ixcoshé, Basílica de Esquipulas, Parroquia Santiago de Esquipulas and Casas antiguas de la zona 1. atten:JoséContreras12 (talk) 23:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic