User talk:GT1976/archive/2018

• archive/2006, archive/2007, archive/2008, archive/2009, archive/2010, archive/2011, archive/2012, archive/2013, archive/2014, archive/2015, archive/2016, archive/2017, archive/2018, archive/2019, archive/2020

File:2018-01-01 (170) Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg

File:2018-01-01 (170) Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: COM:CSD#F7 Empty file. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-01 (173) ÖAMTC Christophorus 14 Airbus H135 OE-XEK in alpine operation during landing with admission in Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really the easiest composition to shoot, but quality is for me high enough for Q1. BTW I have seen the low resolution, but 2.816*2.112MB> 2MB --Michielverbeek 09:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-01 (179) ÖAMTC Christophorus 14 Airbus H135 OE-XEK in alpine operation in Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 10:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-01 (183) ÖAMTC Christophorus 14 Airbus H135 OE-XEK in alpine operation during departure in Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Small resolution, acceptable for these kind of photographs. --XRay 06:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-28 (329) Overhead line at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The pile seems to be slightly crooked. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 07:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-01 (156) Supersnow snow cannon in Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support. Good quality, but too few pixels.--Famberhorst 06:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-28 (305) 33 72 7849 901-3 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 15:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-28 (323) Gravel wagons at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 15:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-12 (29) Rotable Fingerpost in Bichlberg in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-12 (35) Tree at Groß-Brandgraben near Bichlberg in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-01 (178) ÖAMTC Christophorus 14 Airbus H135 OE-XEK in alpine operation in Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Female_ski_jumpers_by_country

Female ski jumpers by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 15:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-15 (153) Unidentified lichens in Matrei in Osttirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-15 (128) Cirsium eriophorum (Woolly Thistle) at Prägraten am Großvenediger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-28 (155) Asplenium trichomanes (maidenhair spleenwort) between Weißenburggegend and Hofstadtgegend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-28 (157) Bryophytes at three between Weißenburggegend and Hofstadtgegend in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-28 (163) Unidentified tinder fungus and bryophytes between Weißenburggegend and Hofstadtgegend in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-12 (107) Old Cartwheel as garden decoration in Haltgraben, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-18 (400) Downpipe strainer at Friedhof Plankenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (197) View from Friedhof St. Gotthard to Pfarrkirche St. Gotthard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality of the image. The tower seems to be slightly askew.--Famberhorst 06:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-13 (101) TLF-A 1000 Weißenburg, KLF-A Weißenburg and VF Kirchberg an der Pielach at powertest of the breathing apparatus men in Weißenburg, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-12 (110) Old Cartwheel as garden decoration in Haltgraben, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-10-08 (02) Cross-district firefighters exercise at Schwabeck, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-10-08 (06) Cross-district firefighters exercise at Schwabeck, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schwabeck appears to be slightly askew. Image quality good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-10-08 (09) Cross-district firefighters exercise at Schwabeck, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-28 (134) Josefskapelle at Weißenburggegend.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Buildings are sharp --Daniel Case 23:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (105) 31 81 2741 249-8 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-01 (169) Demaclenko snow cannon at Hennestecklift in Annaberg, Lower Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-13 (111) TLF-A 1000 Weißenburg, KLF-A Weißenburg and VF Kirchberg an der Pielach at powertest of the breathing apparatus men in Weißenburg, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-12 (115) Most barrel as a decorative object at Haltgraben, Frankenfels at Haltgraben, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-12 (116) Frog as a decorative object in Haltgraben, Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-27 (117) Snow cannon Technoalpin TF 10 at Gemeindealpe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-27 (143) Snow cannon Technoalpin T 40 at Gemeindealpe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-27 (225) Snow cannon Technoalpin T40 at Gemeindealpe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Fotos vom Bahnhof Spratzern

Hallo GT1976, aus welchem Grund entfernst du Fotos auf denen die Gleisanlagen des Bahnhofes Spratzern zu sehen sind aus der Kategorie "Bahnhof Spratzern"? GrußPriwo (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, das war ein Fehler! --GT1976 (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-28 (234) Railway crossing monitoring signal (EKÜS 1) for the Mariazellerbahn at Schloßgegend in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-28 (237) Overhead line tensioners for the Mariazellerbahn at Schloßgegend in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-28 (224) Rhombus warning sign before railway crossing for the Mariazellerbahn at Schloßgegend in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-08 (203) NÖVOG OB 9 at Bahnhof Schwarzenbach an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-09 (296) Columbidae (Dove) at Náměstí Svornosti in Český Krumlov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 20:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-09 (298) Columba livia domestica (city doves) at Náměstí Svornosti in Český Krumlov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 20:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-09 (300) Columba livia domestica (city dove) at Náměstí Svornosti in Český Krumlov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --Armenak Margarian 18:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-07 (113) 31 81 4575 454-1 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe it is better to cut the piece of wagon on the right. But for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-28 (207) Gilera 50 5V Trial at Park and Ride for bicycles at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-07 (114) 31 55 4575 053-3 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Weak support. Pole on the right is a bit crooked. front rail could have been sharper.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-01-09_(114)_Dienstgrade.jpg

Hallo GT1976, acht edits und noch immer unkategorisiert, hast du eine Idee was auf dem Foto zu sehen ist? Zumindest eine Beschreibung in Deutsch wäre schön. Weitere unkategorisierte Files aus 2018 findest du unter https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=3316015. Und da gäbs noch eines aus 2017. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Ich weiß es schon, hab sie aber noch nicht beschrieben und richtig kategorisiert. Daher habe ich sie auch in der Arbeitskategorie Category:Files by User:GT1976 partially uncategorized. --GT1976 (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-16 (120) ÖBB 4744 012 at Bahnhof Wolkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-16 (258) Semperit Master-Grip 2 205-60 R 15 92 H tire at Bahnhof Korneuburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-22 (500) 31 81 5380 337-0 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-16 (253) Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850 195-65 R 15 91 T tire at Bahnhof Korneuburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-16 (119) ÖBB 4744 012 at Bahnhof Wolkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-20 (126) Clock at Bahnhof Pottenbrunn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:OZ_alloy_wheels

Category:OZ_alloy_wheels has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lord van Tasm @ de:WP (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-22 (503) 31 81 5375 264-3 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 12:07, 01 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Czechina

Hi GT1976, what want you to express with your neologism "Czechina"?

The word "Czechina" was used recently past the meeting of the Czech president Zeman with the president of People Republic of China, to parody his obsequious effort to ingratiate Czechia with China. The word can also ridicule people who are not able to distinguish Czechia from Chechnya. However, your intention with the word is unclear. --ŠJů (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello ŠJů! Thanks for the hint. It was just a typo, without any political or philosophical motivation. I changed it to Category:Files by User:GT1976 in the Czech Republic. --GT1976 (talk) 21:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-21 (150) Tactile paving at Bahnhof Waidhofen an der Ybbs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo could have been sharper (used tripod?) But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-12 (120) Narrow gauge rail wagon Bi-s 3860 at train station Kienberg-Gaming.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Please keep Category:Women by name

even if you add Category:Women of Austria by name or similar, because thats a flat category. Thx. --JuTa 23:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello JuTa! Thanks for the hint. But where is that defined? This is noted in Category:People by name, but not here. --GT1976 (talk) 06:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Under Category talk:Men by name is a small note about it. --JuTa 06:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

There is only an information that someone should change it. Currently, the state is such that it is not a flat category. I do not care about it, but if that's how it should be, then it also needs to be defined and described. How should anyone else know it? The info on a discussion of another article page surely nobody finds. --GT1976 (talk) 06:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, ich habe nun alle 3 Cats {{FlatMetaCat}} {{FlatCat}} vergeben. Ich hoffe das reicht. Gruß --JuTa 21:03, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Danke, nun ist es für alle transparent und ich werde mich natürlich auch daran halten. Zwei Fragen habe ich noch:

• Welchen Sinn haben diese flat categories? Es macht ja grundsätzich Sinn, Redundanzen zu vermeiden, sonst hätte z. B. Category:Konrad Adenauer nicht 40 Kategorien, sondern 5000.
• Warum sind diese versteckte Kategorien? Meiner Meinung macht es Sinn, z. B. Benutzerkategorien, oder technische Kategorien (z. B. Löschanträge) zu verstecken, nicht aber z. B. Category:Women by name. Warum werden diese versteckt?

Schönen Sonntag aus Österreich wünscht GT1976. --GT1976 (talk) 06:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

• Diese Cats sind ehr für interne Wartung da. Zum Beispiel mit PetScan recht sinnvoll zu verwenden, um irgendwo neue aber noch nicht kategorisierte Sachen zu finden.
• Das sind IMHO halt ehr technische Kategorien, wie oben beschrieben. Und versteckte Kategorien sind ja nicht wirklich versteckt. (Fast) jeder sieht sie ja trotzdem, halt nur in etwas kleinerer Schriftart.

Gruß --JuTa 06:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Ich sehe und bewerte die versteckten Kategorien ja auch genau so. Nur ist mir aufgefallen, dass ich z. B. durch meine Ergänzungen von Category:Women of Austria auf Category:Women of Austria by name diese Kategorien für einige unsichtbar gemacht habe. Ich habe letztere daher sichtbar gemacht. Ich habe das ohne Rückfrage gemacht, weil ich gesehen habe, dass es in den verschiedeneden Kategorien und Staaten offenbar keine einheitliche Regel gibt. --GT1976 (talk) 06:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Österreichischer Personen

Hallo GT1976, die Category:People by name ist aber schon sehr redundant zu Category:Women of Austria by name überhaupt wenn es beide versteckte Kat sunbd, bringt das was? ;-= --K@rl (talk) 18:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Servus Karl! Das bringt meiner Meinung auch wenig, da liege ich völlig bei Dir.

Category:People by name ist als sogenante flat category definiert, die bei jeder Person sein soll. Das steht auch auf der betreffenden Kategorieseite ganz oben beschrieben. Welchen Sinn das hat, weiß ich nicht.

Ein Abschnitt oberhalb auf meiner Diskussionsseite wurde ich gebeten, dass auch die gleichermaßen völlig redundante Category:Women by name zusätzich stehen soll, obwohl hier kein Hinweis auf eine flat category vorliegt. Warum weiß ich auch noch nicht.

Welche Kategorien hier versteckt sein müssen oder sollen, habe ich mich auch schon oft gefragt. Ich habe noch kein durchgängiges System gefunden. Generell herrscht hier gegenüber der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia großes Chaos und es gibt wenig Regeln. --GT1976 (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-12 (153) Alex. Friedmann narrow gauge wagon bearing at Bahnhof Kienberg-Gaming.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *   Weak support Photo could have been sharper. And it gravel under the rail somewhat darker and more contrast.--Famberhorst 16:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-16 (216) 33 87 9335 557-3 at Bahnhof Korneuburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (224) 83 56 9308 664-6 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (222) Liebherr 900 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (233) Buffer at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Man hole cover für ganz dünne :-)

Hallo GT1976, ich habe dein Foto File:2017-09-14 (118) Manhole cover at Bahnhof Neulengbach.jpg schon einmal umkategorisiert - denn es ist ja ein Regenwassereinlass und kein Mannloch für den Kanal - eine Umbenenennung des Fotos wäre auch angebracht, denn so ist es irreführend. --gruß K@rl (talk) 11:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Hast recht, Karl! lG: GT1976. --GT1976 (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Noch was, ich hab dir ein Mail geschrieben. --lg K@rl (talk) 08:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Danke für die Info, muss es mir genauer anschauen. :-) --GT1976 (talk) 07:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (208) 31 81 5341 378-2 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (204) 33 80 7965 051-5 with Methanol at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (209) 23 88 4371 072-0 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (211) 31 81 5380 072-3 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (224) 31 81 2893 252-8 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (227) ÖBB 2070 011-9 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-12 (234) 37 84 7829 522-3 at Hauptbahnhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (120) 31 81 3925 515-8 at Bahnhof Unter Purkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:39, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (227) 83 56 9308 589-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (702) ÖBB 5047 001-2 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (212) Old freight wagon without RIC-number at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (402) 99 81 9358 006-0 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (406) Trains at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (410) 33 81 7748 245-6 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (106) 37 84 7829 527-2 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (226) 83 56 9308 613-3 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (115) 33 56 3527 016-8 at Bahnhof Unter Purkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (118) 33 87 3526 380-2 at Bahnhof Unter Purkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (135) Freight trains at Bahnhof Unter Purkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (136) 40 81 9463 735-6 at Bahnhof Unter Purkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-01 (117) Bus stop Kreuztanne at St. Anton an der Jeßnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (117) 21 81 4395 025-9 at Bahnhof Unter Purkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (231) 33 56 9322 606-9 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (427) 40 81 9418 024-1 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (109) 37 84 7843 683-5 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-01 (115) Bus stop Kreuztanne at St. Anton an der Jeßnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 06:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (411) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (415) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You had the upper right corner may cut away better. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 07:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (451) Preheating locomotive ÖBB 011.43 (Ex-1042 050) at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (455) 99 81 9374 528-3 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (463) 21 81 2374 313-8 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (409) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (416) Railway point at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (424) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (456) Preheating locomotive ÖBB 011.43 (Ex-1042 050) at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (448) Loading place at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (408) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --GT1976 11:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Good image but no good description. What is it? -- Spurzem 13:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (449) 99 81 9374 528-3 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (460) Preheating locomotive ÖBB 011.43 (Ex-1042 050) at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (454) 21 81 2743 642-1 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (103) Freight wagons at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (423) 31 55 2890 037-8 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:37, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (421) 31 55 2890 039-4 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-19 (439) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:29, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-07 (107) 31 54 2770 949-0 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (813) 21 81 0884 273-1 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (819) 33 80 7965 281-8 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-04 (307) ÖBB 50 81 21-73 071-9 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Spratzern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (822) Buffer at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Fotos vom Bahnhof Göpfritz

Servus GT1976, die Fotos vom Bahnhof Göpfritz hast du in die datumsmäßig falsche Kategorie einsortiert. Gruß Priwo (talk) 10:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Servus! Danke für den Hinweis uns sorry für den Fehler. Ich ließ mich täuschen, weil der Dateiname systematisch gleich war und auch die Witterung und Bildqualität sehr ähnlich ist. :-). Deine Bilder finde ich übrigens toll. Ich habe in letzter Zeit einige Bahnhofsfotos und auch Detailaufnahmen gemacht und zum Teil schon eingestellt. Viele habe ich noch lokal auf meinem PC. Fast bei jedem Bahnhof haben sich die letzten Jahre viele kleine Änderungen ergeben, z. B. Blindenleitsysteme, Wartehäuschen, Tafeln, Displays, etc. --GT1976 (talk) 11:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Ist ja gut das die ÖBB was zur Attraktivierung der Bahnhöfe tut. Priwo (talk) 11:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-09 (119) Caltha palustris (marsh-marigold) at Bichlhäusl at Haltgraben in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-09 (120) Caltha palustris (marsh-marigold) at Bichlhäusl at Haltgraben in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-09 (111) Primula vulgaris (primrose) at Bichlhäusl at Haltgraben in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me. Do you want to write the latin name in italics? That is common with Latin names. I've done it for you for a while,--Famberhorst 15:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-07 (200) Mounty Reform 100 V with manure spreader at Haltgraben in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Old men of Austria

Hallo GT, was soll diese Kategorisierung File:Retz-LFLB-2014 0197.JPG da musst du sie ja auch unter 50 young men und women etc. reintun - denn wer ist mit dem alten Mann gemeint, der Didi wirds ja net sein ;-) Ich glaub net, dass die Kategorie so gemeint ist. --K@rl (talk) 08:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Karl! Old men wurde hier definiert mit Männer ab 60. Das ist mit Erwin Pröll erfüllt. Ich habe eine Zwischenkategorie eingefügt, damit ist es offensichtlicher. --GT1976 (talk) 04:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

so kann man es machen - ich finde allerdings diese Kategorieart nur für Fotos, die eben die eine Person zeigen oder Portraits sinnvoll, aber nicht wo Personen kaum erkennbar sind, sondern nur in Bezug auf die Veranstaltung. Man kann alles übertreiben.  ;-) --K@rl (talk) 07:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Datumskategorie

Hallo GT1976, warum stellst da nicht die gnaze Kategorie unter ein Datum, statt jedes Foto einzeln, Bei dieser Übung kann nix mehr dazukommen oder auf ein anderes Datum kommen. --K@rl (talk) 11:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Die Kategorie hat den Namen Firefighting and rescue training in Vorderweißenbach. Ich kann daher nicht ausschließen, dass andere Medien in diese Kategorie sind oder dazu kommen. Würde die Kategorie Photographs of Firefighting and rescue training in Vorderweißenbach heißen, dann würde ich nur die Kategorie in den Ast Category:Photographs of Austria by date geben. --GT1976 (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Wiesrotte

Hallo GT1976, wenn ich das richtig verstehe, dann sind in der Kategorie Category:Wiesrotte hauptsächlich Adressen und unterhalb der Adressen nochmals Kategorien für die Vulgonamen der Höfe. Ist aber dasselbe. Was hältst du davon, eine der beiden Systematiken in Redirects zu verwandeln? Dann ist der Ast nur halb so zerspragelt. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Wir können das gerne so machen. Ich habe mir schon öfter die Frage gestellt, wie die Kategoriehierarchie bei Häusern und Adressen am sinnvollsten ist. Es kann sein, dass es einen Volgonamen für mehrere Adressen gibt und es kann auch sein, dass es eine Adresse für mehrere Volgonamen gibt. Sollte dann die Adresse, oder der Volgonamen die Überkategorie sein? --GT1976 (talk) 08:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

mein genereller Vorschlag wäre es, das ganze weniger systematisch zu gestalten. Die Systematik lässt sich ohnehin nur durchhalten, solange du der alleinige Beiträger bist. Wenn es einen Vulgo für mehrere Adressen gibt (vorausgesetzt es ist derselbe Vulgo und nicht nur eine Namensgleichheit), dann würde ich den umfassenderen Begriff wählen, in diesem Fall den Vulgonamen. Die Adressen würde ich weglassen, in der Beschreibung anführen oder per category redirect auf den Vulgonamen verlinken. Mir reichte das Anführen der Adressen in der Beschreibung. Gibt es nur eine Adresse und mehrere Vulgos (und es handelt sich nicht um Synonyme, sondern um unterschiedliche Höfe), würde ich genauso vorgehen. Kategorien für die Vulgos und immer dieselbe Adresse in der Beschreibung. Category redirect von einer Adresse auf die mehreren Vulgos ist dann natürlich nicht. Hast du Beispiele für die Problemfälle?

Das Verlinken von Personenkategorien (die ich für gewöhnliche Menschen schon an sich für problematisch halte, etwa für einfache Feuerwehrleute) zu den Höfen / Adressen gefällt mir aus Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzgründen nicht. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Ich habe nun die Adressen in der Wiesrotte entfernt und auch die Verlinkung der Personen zu den Adressen. Bei de anderen Rotten mache ich es auch noch. Danke für den Hinweis. --GT1976 (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Danke. Ich habe den category redirect gemeint, der ist unter den Edittools verfügbar, {{Category redirect}}, das ist der übliche Kategorielink. Wenn das unnötige Reste sind, kannst du sie auch löschen lassen.

Verstehe nicht ganz, warum in Category:Wiesrotte jetzt einige leere Kategorien sind, waren die vorher auch schon leer? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Da waren die Personen drinnen. Ich habe die Kategorien aber gelassen, weil ich vor habe, von den Bauernhäusern Bilder zu machen bzw. schon gemacht habe und erst hochladen muss. Stören diese in der Zwischenzeit? Dann lösche ich diese auch. --GT1976 (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Nein, wenn demnächst was kommt, dann passt es schon. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Bilderwünsche

Hallo GT1976, kennst du das Bilderwunsch API? z.B. fehlende Bilder um Frankenfels. Falls du mal in der Gegend mit der Kamera herumkommst, sonst per Doppelklick Umgebung wechseln. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki]! Nein, das kannte ich noch nicht, danke! --GT1976 (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (005).jpg

And also:

• File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (041).jpg
• File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (042).jpg
• File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (043).jpg
• File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (044).jpg
• File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (059).jpg
• File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (075).jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^☎ 03:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (108) 31 81 2743 425-2 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (111) 31 81 4575 728-8 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (114) WESTbahn with motion blur at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (101) 31 81 4575 541-5 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (113) 31 81 4575 728-8 at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (215) Bearing of old freight wagon without RIC-number at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture might have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (217) 33 53 9332 586-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (203) 31 56 3536 080-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (207) 31 81 5377 227-8 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (211) 31 81 4668 098-4 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (235) 31 81 4587 228-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (224) 21 81 2470 065-7 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (217) 33 53 9332 586-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (216) 33 53 9332 586-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (223) 21 81 2470 094-7 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (210) 31 55 4777 037-2 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Famberhorst 05:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (139) Syringa vulgaris (Common Lilac) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (147) Tragopogon pratensis (Jack-go-to-bed-at-noon) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (149) Tragopogon pratensis (Jack-go-to-bed-at-noon) with Insect at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (243) Nature near Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria and view to south-east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (100) Unidentified Sempervivum (houseleek) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (226) Nature at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels and view to Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (244) Nature near Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria and view to south-east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (117) Spiraea (spiraea) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (129) Geranium (cranesbills) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (132) Vinca (periwinkle) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (133) Sedum (stonecrop) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (139) Bubo scandiacus (Snowy owl) at Castle Oberkapfenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (127) Nature at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (185) Female Lycaena tityrus (Sooty Copper) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (212) Euonymus (spindle) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (126) Aquilegia (granny's bonnet) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (167) Nature at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10 (185) Bus stop at the fire station St. Georgen an der Leys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (140) Bubo scandiacus (Snowy owl) at Castle Oberkapfenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (185) Grüner See at Tragöß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (186) Kreuzteich at Tragöß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (406) Tree stump with fungi at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (395) Graves at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (377) Grave at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-28 (137) Rail tracks at Bahnhof Traismauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (459) Trailer at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (783) ÖBB 4746 at Bahnhof Prinzersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-19 (508) Rail tracks at Bahnhof Lilienfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-19 (522) Rail tracks at Bahnhof Lilienfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (323) Gruppe IX at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (653) Graves at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (211) Alchemilla (lady's mantle) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (394) Chapel at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (325) Graves at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (326) Gruppe XI at Hauptfriedhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Men of India

Recently, you moved several categories (such as Category:Anubrata Chatterjee‎) from Category:Men of India to Category:Men of India by name. I believe this is a mistake. While you are welcome to add the latter, it is a hidden (non-topical) category, and should not replace a normal topical category. Please undo these changes. - Jmabel ! talk 15:45, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Similarly for men of Germany, women of Germany. - Jmabel ! talk 15:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jmabel! Thanks for the hint and sorry for my bad English. Yes, that's right, I've moved categories of people from existing categories to existing specific subcategories (...by name). Nobody generaly could explain exactly why some systematic equal categories are hidden and some are not. In my opinion, there is no uniform concept. It's also true that the hidden categories can also be seen and found by the most systems. At any rate, I am not aware that category redundancy must be achieved when an overcategory or subcategory is hidden. Redundancies (double categories) are to my knowledge only in so-called flat categories desired. Where do you have a source, where that in the case of hidden categories, redundant category entries must to be generated? --GT1976 (talk) 06:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

I see you won't take a clear warning from me on this, and you are persisting in making these moves. I'll bring this to the Commons:Administrators' noticeboard; in the event that I turn out to be mistaken, fine, but I'm pretty confident other admins will agree with my interpretation of this. - Jmabel ! talk 06:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

OK, I can only repeat my opinion. It makes perfect sense to get several opinions. Best regards from Lower Austria. --GT1976 (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Vehicles_with_license_plates

Vehicles with license plates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-22 (108) Spiraea (spiraea) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-12 (201) ÖBB 50 81 80-73 209-3 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-12 (101) Terex TW110 of Swietelsky in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (217) 35 81 4677 006-2 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please be more explicit with the file description. --Moroder 14:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-15 (061) Alchemilla monticola (mountain meadow lady's mantle) at Matrei in Osttirol, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (815) 31 81 5341 378-2 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (811) 31 81 5377 350-0 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-02 (205) Buffer with Roll marks at Bahnhof St. Valentin and 21 81 0884 242-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-04 (309) 61 81 21-90 506-0 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Spratzern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-04 (306) 80 81 9747 933-6 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Spratzern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-04 (303) 80 81 9745 930-4 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Spratzern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-04 (300) 40 81 9446 330-8 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Spratzern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-04 (304) 40 81 9446 530-3 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Spratzern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (102) 37 84 7838 332-6 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (106) 33 80 7841 714-8 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (136) 37 84 7829 684-1 and other freight wagons at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (154) 33 53 5301 762-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (156) Iveco Postbus at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-20 (208) Buffer from Weichenwerk Wörth at Bahnhof Absdorf-Hippersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (803) 37 80 5932 029-1 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-04 (110) Overhead line switchgear at Bahnhof Kirchstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Cercopis vulnerata, more pics in your category of undefined insects ;)

Hi GT1976, there are a few more of this species in your category, I think you will rename, replace desciption, catmove and so on on these pics. NobbiP 19:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

OK, thank you, NobbiP! :-) --GT1976 (talk) 17:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (117) 33 80 7841 709-8 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (138) Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (157) Iveco Postbus at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (206) Cows at Haltgraben in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (100) Cotoneaster dammeri (carpet cotoneaster) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (121) 33 80 7841 709-8 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (132) 37 84 7838 338-3 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (133) 37 84 7838 338-3 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (141) Bicycles at Park and Ride Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (153) 33 53 5301 567-0 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (155) 33 53 5495 126-1 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (820) 33 80 7965 054-9 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good --Michielverbeek 18:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (108) 37 84 7843 681-9 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-22 (05) Information Aktion Saubere Berge at Lechnergraben at Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharpness and colors -- MJJR 20:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-22 (36) Land Rover Defender at Ybbstaler Hütte at Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (160) Accipitridae (Accipitridae) at Castle Oberkapfenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (146) Geranium (cranesbills) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (201) Cows at Haltgraben in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (129) 37 84 7838 336-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (147) Bogie of 33 53 5320 020-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-23 (50) Fingerpost to Ybbstaler Hütte at Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-23 (57) Steinbachtal at Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-15 (117) Cows at Frankenfelsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (112) Lysimachia punctata (dotted loosestrife) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (107) Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (145) Wheel of 33 53 5301 485-5 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (144) Bogie of 33 53 5301 485-5 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (152) Bogie of 33 53 5301 762-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-22 (07) Cobbles at Lechnergraben at Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (197) Raiffeisen Lagerhaus behind train station St. Valentin, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (804) 31 80 3546 159-5 with Graffiti at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (110) 37 84 7843 693-4 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (146) Wheel of 33 53 5301 485-5 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-19 (172) Mercedes-Benz Integro (12 m) at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 10:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (114) ÖBB 2016 025 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Slightly tilted to the left. -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Good now. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (124) 37 84 7838 336-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Slightly tilted to the left. -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC) Good now. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (111) 33 87 7837 207-2 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (137) Freight trains at Bahnhof Unter Purkersdorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (106) Lysimachia punctata (dotted loosestrife) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (101) 33 80 7848 891-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Haussegnung St. Georgen

Hallo GT1976, ich habe deine Fotos von St. Georgen an der Leys gesehen. Wäre es nicht einfacher, wenn du diese Fotos alle in eine sichtbare Kat Category:Feuerwehr- und Musikvereinshaussegnung St. Georgen an der Leys reingibst. Diese kannst du dann bei der Feuerwehr und beim Musikverein als Ereignis reingeben. Die Segnung gibst auch unter die Events in Lowe Austria, etc. Ich mache es in Oberösterreich siehe Category:2018 events in Upper Austria auch so. Die Kategorisierung in solchen Fällen mehr Ereignisbezogen als nur Sachbezogen. --K@rl (talk) 09:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Karl! Das kann ich gerne machen. Ich muss gestehen, dass ich erst seit 2017 intensiver mit Commons arbeite und am Anfang habe ich leider relativ schlecht kategorisiert und beschrieben. --GT1976 (talk) 11:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

done. --GT1976 (talk) 11:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Danke für das Verständnis. -K@rl (talk) 15:06, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Sankt und St.

Hallo GT1976, ich rauf grad mit St. Georgen herum - in Niederösterreich gibt es kein Sankt als Gemeindenamen nur St. - siehe auch [1], in Salzburg detto, in der Steiermark ist es umgekehrt da gibt es kein St. - das sollte man in Commons auch beibehalten. --K@rl (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Diese Bezeichnungen sind mir auch schon aufgefallen. Ebenso auch Category:Amstetten, Austria vs. en:Amstetten,_Lower_Austria vs. de:Amstetten... --GT1976 (talk) 03:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (301) NÖVOG OB 11 at Bahnhof Ober-Grafendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (802) 31 81 3925 593-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-01 (805) 33 56 5384 020-7 at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (151) Bogie of 33 53 5301 762-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (305) Old freight wagon at Bahnhof Ober-Grafendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (808) BOMAG BW 138 AC from Swietelsky in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-28 (371) 40 81 9428 863-0 at Bahnhof Stockerau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (123) Spiraea (spiraea) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (142) 33 53 5301 485-5 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (809) Hamm HD 80 from Swietelsky in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-22 (206) Kästle Degree 3.5 at Bahnhof Langenlebarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-22 (200) Train station platform at Bahnhof Langenlebarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-22 (201) Train station platform at Bahnhof Langenlebarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-22 (210) ÖBB 4024 137-4 at Bahnhof Langenlebarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-22 (211) ÖBB 4024 137-4 at Bahnhof Langenlebarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Ribbon bars

Hallo GT1976, was sind ribbon bars? - nie gehört und nirgends gefunden. danke K@rl (talk) 07:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Servus Karl! Siehe hier und hier. Man ist mal drauf gekommen, dass Metall zu schwer ist... :-) --GT1976 (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

• 
  Romania
• 
  USA
• 
  UdSSR

OKay, du meinst Ordensspangen ;-) - ich dachte zuerst an die Kolbenringe am Ärmel. --K@rl (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Aber sind diese pro Jahr aufgedröselt net unnötig, denn die machen ja im Jahr keinen Unterschied, ob ich die Adabei 2000 oder 2018 trage - denn mit der Verleihung hats ja eh nix zu tun. --K@rl (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Dinge ändern sich. Eine Ordenspange von 1918 schaut anders aus, als eine von 2018 oder eine vom Deutschen Reich. Ich habe diese Ordenspangen in das vorhandene System eingegliedert. Hätte ich auf das Jahr verzichtet, so wäre zusätzlich die Category:People in 2018, etc. notwendig geweesen. Möchte jemand Category:Recipients of orders, decorations and medals ergänzen, dann tu man sich auch leichter, wenn es zeitliche Eingränzungen gibt und nicht tausende Dateien unter Category:People with ribbon bars zu suchen sind. --GT1976 (talk) 02:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Genau das meinte ich - du hast ja nur das Fotodatum, nicht das Verleihdatum und nach dem ändert sich es ja und nicht nach dem Fotodatum - deine Kat sind aber nach dem Fotodatum eingereiht. --K@rl (talk) 08:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Wesentlich ist hier aber das Aufnahmedatum. Die Kategorien heißen ja People ... with ribbon bars in 2012. Bei Category:People in 2012 ist ja auch nicht das Geburtsdatum gemeint, sondern das Aufnahmedatum. --GT1976 (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

General Johannes Steinhoff mit einigen Auszeichnungen vom 2. Weltkrieg auf der Ordensspange, die es in dieser Ausführung am Tag der Auszeichnung nicht gegeben hat.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (105) 37 84 7829 521-5 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-22 (218) Dummy security camera DMC-380 from Conrad Electronic at train station underpass at Bahnhof Langenlebarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy ... and they should remove the sticker. ;-) --XRay 06:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (131) 33 80 7841 713-0 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (805) Paver from Swietelsky in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-01-12 (100) Steyr 980 in Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (122) 37 84 7843 695-9 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sixflashphoto 01:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (402) Baler Krone Fortima V 1500 MC in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (804) Massey Ferguson 253 in Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (128) 37 84 7838 336-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (116) Hydrangea (snowball hortensia) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (120) Hydrangea (snowball hortensia) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-23 (44) Origanum vulgare (oregano) and Buphthalmum salicifolium (ox-eye) at Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (119) Phedimus aizoon (aizoon stonecrop) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Stell dir vor ...

jemand sucht ein schönes Foto von Emmersdorf, das in meinen Augen sogar gibt: [2]. Jetzt muss der Suchende wissen, dass das Foto im Jahr 2008 gemacht wurde, oder all "deine zeitbezogenen Kategorien" durchsuchen ([3]), damit er dieses Foto findet - findest du das nutzerfreundlich/sinnvoll? Bwag (talk) 10:32, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Dieses Thema hat man in jeder Ortskategorie und sinngemäß auch bei anderen. Außer man legt z. B. Category:Panoramic views of Emmersdorf an der Donau oder Category:Quality images of Emmersdorf an der Donau an, wo man dann schnell übersichtliche oder gute Bilder finden kann. Mir persönlich gefällt das Bild sehr gut, aber wer legt fest, welches das schönste Bild ist? Ich habe bei Wikidata übrigens ein anderes durch dein Bild ersetzt. Nun sollte es keiner übersehen, da es stellvertretend für die Kategorie ist. --GT1976 (talk) 10:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Es geht nicht um ob das Foto schön ist oder nicht, sondern dass man es auch findet, ohne den "GT1976-Algorithmus" zu kennen. Bwag (talk) 11:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

PS: Es ist nicht mein Bild.

Diese Logik gibt es schon seit einigen Jahren und sie wurde nicht von mir erfunden, siehe Category:Categories by date. Auch in Österreich und Niederösterreich wurde sie nicht von mir erfunden, das ist ein allgemeines Kategorisierungssystem, siehe z. B. Category:Categories of Austria by date und Category:Lower Austria by year. --GT1976 (talk) 11:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

OK, mittlerweile hast du dem Foto außer der "zeitlichen Kategorie" noch eine weitere verpasst ([4]) und damit kann ich leben. Mich störte nur, dass das Foto nur über die "zeitliche Kategorie" auffindbar war. Bwag (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

OK, alles klar, danke und beste Grüße: --GT1976 (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (304) Freight wagon 31 81 3925 274-2 with wood at Bahnhof Enns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (332) Wachauer Radtage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (107) 37 84 7840 930-3 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (138) Lycaenidae (gossamer-winged butterfly) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (103) 33 80 7841 708-0 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (401) Steyr 50 and Massey Ferguson 590 in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (316) Wachauer Radtage at Donaubrücke Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (109) 37 84 7840 928-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (100) Information boards of organisations in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (308) Wachauer Radtage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (300) NÖVOG ET1–ET9 (Himmelstreppe) at Bahnhof Ober-Grafendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but it might have been sharper --Michielverbeek 06:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-03 (703) View from parking deck at Park and Ride to 86-33 033-0 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-03 (709) Demaged 33 80 7978 603-8 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-03 (711) Roof hatch at 33 80 7978 603-8 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-03 (724) ÖBB 1144 255-0 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-03 (725) View from Park and Ride to Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (220) 4744 021 at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (223) Train station sign at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (224) Train station platform 2 at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (232) ÖBB 1016 with freight train at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (143) 33 53 5301 485-5 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-24 (139) Way from Haltgraben to Grüntalkogelhütte, rest at Gotthardlsteig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-03 (728) Class 386 of METRANS Rail at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-04 (303) Tank wagon 33 80 7920 362-0 with hydrocarbon gas at Bahnhof Enns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but it might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 03:52, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (104) 33 80 7841 708-0 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (221) 4744 021 at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (225) 4744 025 at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (226) 4744 025 at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (227) 4744 525 at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 00:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (344) Wachauer Radtage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (402) 37 80 5377 192-9 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (409) 31 81 5380 294-3 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (410) 40 81 9471 337-1 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (109) Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (113) 33 54 7841 234-9 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (329) Wachauer Radtage in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (228) Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (400) 80 81 9770 696-9 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (112) 33 54 7841 234-9 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (229) Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (252) Puch Maxi S at Bahnhof Stadt Haag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (415) 21 81 0738 504-7 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:16, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (114) Cotoneaster dammeri (carpet cotoneaster) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (123) 37 84 7843 695-9 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (406) 31 81 5376 111-5 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-28 (403) Krone rotary rake in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (346) Wachauer Radtage 2018 in Emmersdorf an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (139) KTM Bicycle at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)  Comment A better picture description would be "bicycle stand at the station Herzogenburg". In addition, the bike should be a bit sharper. -- Spurzem 09:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (110) 33 87 7837 207-2 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-10 (601) Bahnhof Loich, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (310) Wachauer Radtage in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (400) 80 81 9770 696-9 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-26 (252) Bahnhof Petzenkirchen, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-26 (253) Roll marks at Bahnhof Petzenkirchen, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-26 (260) Park and Ride at Bahnhof Petzenkirchen, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (201) Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a small perspective correction is needed. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 04:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (116) 33 80 7841 709-8 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (403) 37 80 5377 203-4 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (105) 33 80 7841 714-8 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (148) 33 53 5320 020-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-10 (601) Bahnhof Loich, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (310) Wachauer Radtage in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (321) Wachauer Radtage 2018 in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-12 (106) Hedera helix (Efeu) at Haltgraben in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-06 (125) ÖBB 5047 029-3 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Moving from People of Israel by name to Women/Men of Israel by name

Hello GT1976, the categoy Category:People of Israel by name is a flat list. You should not move from this category. You can copy from them. -- Geagea (talk) 07:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Geagea! I think, this is not a flat Category, look at the other countries (Category:People by name by country). For example Category:People by name or Category:Women by name is a flat list und there is also this information: This category gathers all sub-categories related to its parent category in a non-hierarchical list, including those that would normally only be found via intermediate sub-categories.. Best regards from Austria! :-) --GT1976 (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Well, it is a flat list. You alredy mentioned a non-hierarchical list. People by name, Women by name, People of Israel by name, Men of Israel by name, Women of Israel by name, all are flat list. Also, adding categories that do not contain DEFAULTSORT is useless. these categories ment to help people to find people by sure name and name. -- Geagea (talk) 08:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Look at Category:People of Germany by name, Category:People of the United States by name, Category:People of Turkey by name and hundret others. a non-hierarchical list means, that it is a flat list with redundant categories. In Category:People of Israel by name is no information about a flat list. I leave you with the Israel category, but you will not be able to stop that systematizing others as they do in any other state. --GT1976 (talk) 08:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Wieder einmal eine Kat frage

Barbara Prammer mit Brille

Barbara Prammer mit Brille

Women mit glasses heißt doch Frauen mit Brille, oder? - abgesehen, dass da doch Fotos selbst rein sollen wo diese Frau eine Brille trägt und nicht ganze Kategorien, sonst könnte man ja alle, die eine Lesebrille (90 % der Personen tragen, da rein geben. Aber was macht da Category:Barbara Prammer dabei, wo kein einziges Foto mit Brille ist. --K@rl (talk) 04:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Frau Prammer war in den letzten Jahren Brillenträger, die meisten Personen sind nicht von Geburt Brillenträger. In der Category:Women wearing glasses sind offenbar Bilder mit Brillen, in der Category:Women with glasses sind offenbar Personenkategorien mit Personen, die Brillen tragen. Mir ist diese Systematik auch erst vorhin aufgefallen, weil ich einige Änderungen anderer Benutzer auf meiner Beobachtungsliste hatte. Im Kategoriezweig Category:Men with glasses dürfte es weiter ausgereift sein. Ganz logisch ist es nicht, weil Category:Men with glasses eine Unterkategorie von Category:Males with glasses ist. Die Men-Personenkategorien können aber auch Kinderbilder enthalten, wo keine Männer und Brillen zu sehen sind. Ich habe diese Struktur nicht erfunden, aber wenn es sie gibt, dürfen auch Österreicher dort hin. --GT1976 (talk) 04:59, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Die Logik ist mir insgesamt sehr eigenartig. Denn was such ich? Ein Foto wo ein Mann mit Brille drauf ist, da helfen mir Kat nichts, wo zwar eine Person enthalten ist, die hie und da oder öfter Brille trägt. Die Person an und für sich ist mir da beim suchen wurst. Da könnte ich auch eine Uhr bei allen Uhrzeiten eintragen, denn die Zeiger zeigen einmal im Tag auch jede Uhrzeit an ;-) - also die Logik ist mir nicht klar und nachvollziehbar ;-) --K@rl (talk) 06:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Ich gebe Dir recht und habe auch Deinen Eintrag in Commons:Forum kommentiert. --GT1976 (talk) 06:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-05 (182) Communication center at Bahnhof St. Valentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-24 (114) Trees at way from Haltgraben to Grüntalkogelhütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:54, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (139) Lycaenidae (gossamer-winged butterfly) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-06-25 (16) Viola biflora (arctic yellow violet) at Schneeberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful: good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 05:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-06-25 (33) Hiking sign at Schneeberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 05:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (331) Wachauer Radtage 2018 in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 05:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (418) 40 81 9405 612-8 and 80 81 9727 000-8 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 05:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (405) 31 54 5377 971-4 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-06-25 (19) Galium × pomeranicum (white-yellow bedstraw) at Schneeberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (102) Rubus idaeus (raspberry) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 00:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (104) Unripe Vaccinium myrtillus (blueberry) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Enoigh for qood quality IMO. Can you add the coordinates? Tournasol7 07:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-10 (604) Antenna system near Bahnhof Loich, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (137) 37 84 7838 338-3 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-02 (104) Himmelstreppe at Bahnhof Laubenbachmühle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-02 (125) Train station and village Boding in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-10 (606) Distribution substation near Bahnhof Loich, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo could have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (323) Wachauer Radtage 2018 in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-28 (204) 33 80 7956 689-3 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Kaiserwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-28 (206) Trains at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Kaiserwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-22 (25) Miramella alpina (green mountain grasshopper) at plant in Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-02 (208) Himmelstreppe at Bahnhof Laubenbachmühle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (129) Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce) Nature at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (401) 37 80 5377 192-9 at Bahnhof Pöchlarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (312) Wachauer Radtage at Donaubrücke Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-12 (141) Break blocks at Hauptbahnhof St. Pölten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC) After edit conflict: good quality, Tournasol7 07:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-28 (203) NÖVOG 5081 82-35 314-6 at Bahnhof St. Pölten-Kaiserwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-06 (128) Falkensteinmauer in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-22 (124) Phoenicurus ochruros (black redstart) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Taken with Canon PowerShot SX50 HS by User:GT1976

Hallo GT1976, ich denke nicht, dass Category:Taken with Canon PowerShot SX50 HS by User:GT1976 in dieser Form den Richtlinien entspricht. Konkret: Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories:

Users are welcome to create user-specific categories using their username (e.g. Category:Photos by User:Example) or real or stage name (e.g. Category:Photos by John Doe). Such categories must be categorised only under Category:User categories [...]

Creating subcategories that combine topic/subject focus with a user-specific element (e.g. Category:Photos of London by User:Example) is generally discouraged; user galleries (e.g. User:Example/London) may be used instead. Exceptions can be made for events like photo sessions, for which subcategories of the user's main category may be created using {{user category|cat=subcategory}}. Such Categories must not be categorised under the main category tree, and media files must still be categorised under the main category tree (i.e. files in Category:Photos of the 2012 Summer Olympics by User:Example in the respective subcategories of Categories:2012 Summer Olympics).

Das heißt, die Kategorie darf keine Unterkategorie von Category:Taken with Canon PowerShot SX50 HS sein, sondern vielmehr sollten alle deine mit dieser Kamera aufgenommenen Fotos in beiden Kategorien sein. Jemand, der Fotos sucht, die mit dieser Kamera aufgenommen wurden, sollte nicht auch noch benutzerspezifische Kategorien durchsuchen müssen. Möchtest du das selbst korrigieren oder soll ich es später machen? Tokfo (talk) 07:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Ich weiß nicht was Du genau meinst, redundante Kategorien sind sicher nicht erwünscht. Wie soll ich das Deiner Meinung korrigieren? --GT1976 (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Doch, das ist eben eine Ausnahme zur normalen Konvention: Im normalen Kategorienbaum gehören keine "by User:sowieso"-Kategorien hinein, sondern diese sollten (wenn überhaupt) parallel dazu existieren. Also die Fotos sollten sowohl in Category:Taken with Canon PowerShot SX50 HS als auch Category:Taken with Canon PowerShot SX50 HS by User:GT1976 sein und letztere sollte keine Unterkategorie ersterer sein. Das hat den Grund, dass es keinen Mehrwert für jemanden bringt, der nach Fotos dieser Kamera sucht, wenn er danach filtern kann, welcher Benutzer die Fotos gemacht hat. Tokfo (talk) 20:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Das wusste ich nicht. Dann gehörten z. B. diese Inhalte auch doppelt kategorisiert: Category:Photos by Steven Pavlov taken with Canon PowerShot S3 IS, Category:Images supported by Wikimedia France - Canon PowerShot SX230 HS. Mir ist diese Doppelkategorisierung bei den Cameratypen noch nie aufgefallen. Bei anderen Kategorien findet man den Hinweis, dass es sich um "Flat"-Kategorien handelt, z. B. hier: Category:People by name. Ich kann es gerne selber machen. --GT1976 (talk) 03:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Ich habe nun speziell danach gesucht, habe aber in diesem Bereih keine einzige Doppelkategorisierung gefunden, dafür aber viele Fälle, wo das nicht so ist, z. B. hier: Category:Photos by Mike Peel, Category:Pictures taken by Peter van der Sluijs, Category:Files by User:Himetv/KonicaMinolta Dimage A200, Category:Images by Tabl-trai/FinePix AV130. --GT1976 (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Jetzt verstehe ich, was eigentlich gemeint ist. Es sollten von Grund auf zwei getrennte Kategoriesysteme sein. Ein Kategoriesystem für den Leser bzw. Sichter und einer für interne Benutzerinteressen. In der Praxis wird das offenbar nicht so gemacht. Es ist auch z. B. hier vermischt: Category:Images of Germany by user. Auch dort gibt es eigentlich unerwünschte Verschneidungen. --GT1976 (talk) 03:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Ja, sieht so aus, als würden das auch andere nicht regelkonform handhaben. :/ Mach es, wie du meinst. Tokfo (talk) 07:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Das muss ich mir noch überlegen. :-). Danke und schönes Wochenende! --GT1976 (talk) 07:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:2017-09-10 Segnung Feuerwehrhaus und Musikerheim St. Georgen an der Leys (162).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2017-09-10 Segnung Feuerwehrhaus und Musikerheim St. Georgen an der Leys (162).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2017-09-10 Segnung Feuerwehrhaus und Musikerheim St. Georgen an der Leys (162).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Krd 12:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Datenschutz

Hallo GT1976, ich glaub net , dass du die Erlaubnis von den Kameraden in St. Georgen hast, deren Namen und Geburtsdatum zu veröffentlichen - diese Liste solltest du auf alle Fälle wieder löschen lassen, denn die bringt nix außer vielleicht Ärger. Das heute im Fokus der Datenschutzregelungen erst recht. Außerdem was soll diese bringen? - zu den anderen Fotos: Foto von Foto erzeugt kein neues Urheberrecht - also gilt auch nach Nachfrage Fotograf 70 Jahre tot oder 100 Jahre alt - hilft nix. --lg K@rl (talk) 13:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Ich hatte mündlich die Erlaubnis, das zu fotografieren und zu veröffentlichen. Leider aber nicht von dem Urheber direkt. Eine Veröffentlichung wäre sicher im Sinne der Organisation, weil sonst hätten sie es nicht im Feuerwehrhaus veröffentlicht. Damit es nicht zu kompliziert wird ist es sicher besser, das zu löschen. --GT1976 (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Ganz so einfach ist es aber nicht, weil das Haus kein frei zugängiger Raum ist und damit die Panoramafreiheit nicht zieht. Ein Foto von 1935 - da weiß niemand den Urheber und der Kommandant darf sie dir nicht geben, denn der hat ja selber die Rechte nicht. Aber wende dich an @Krd: der kann dir das noch genauer erklären. Und das mit den Geburtsdaten: Du darfst heute nur mehr unbedingt notwendige Daten speichern, daher darfst du es hier gar nicht, denn hier sind von diesen Leuten keine Daten notwendig. --K@rl (talk) 19:16, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Darum sagte ich ja, am besten alles löschen. Es ist nicht im Sinne der Organisation, aber im Sinne des Gesetzes. --GT1976 (talk) 19:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

was heißt jetzt alles - meinst die ganze Kat - jetzt spiel net den beleidigten, denn es sind ja eine Menge interessante und brauchbare in der Kat drin. --K@rl (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Nein, nicht alle in der Kategorie, sondern alle Bilder, die nicht gemeinfrei sind. Ich habe ja eh schon die Hinweise bezüglich Lizenz, damit sie gelöscht werden können, erstellt. --GT1976 (talk) 03:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

okay sorry, habe ich dann missverstanden - danke für dein Verständnis --lg K@rl (talk) 08:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

OK, ich wollte nicht unfreundlich sein, sorry. Nun dürfte es passen, weil sie schon gelöscht wurden. --GT1976 (talk) 08:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-22 (124) Phoenicurus ochruros (black redstart) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-19 (149) 33 53 5320 020-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (320) Wachauer Radtage in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (342) Wachauer Radtage in Emmersdorf an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-15 (348) Wachauer Radtage in Emmersdorf an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-13 (605) Manhole cover by Meier Guss at Bahnhof Mauthausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-13 (607) Pedestrian level crossing by Strail at Bahnhof Mauthausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-13 (620) Cable drums at Bahnhof Mauthausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-13 (622) Overgrown wall at Bahnhof Mauthausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-12 (550) Steyr 548 at Weissenbach an der Triesting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-23 (61) Steinbachtal at Dürrenstein (Ybbstaler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-28 (063) Hedera helix (Efeu) on northside at Haltgraben in Frankenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (113) Saxifraga x arendsii (mossy saxifrage) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-13 (605) Manhole cover by Meier Guss at Bahnhof Mauthausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Weißenbach_river

Weißenbach river has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (151) Falconry with Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) at castle Oberkapfenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:53, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (156) Falconry at Castle Oberkapfenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:53, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-09 (800) Building site at B 39 Pielachtal Straße in Boding, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-10 (207) Former Papierfabrik Mahler OHG in Rennersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me--Manfred Kuzel 20:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Well let's promote it then.--Peulle 09:43, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (112) Summit cross at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foreground could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (118) Annaberger Haus at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foreground could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-20 (227) Electricity pylon in Pottenbrunn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (170) Hinteregger memorial at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Understanding that the tilt is for real --Poco a poco 19:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (134) Annaberger Haus at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (175) Impatiens glandulifera (Policeman's Helmet) at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-14 (523) Railway bridge over Ybbs River in Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very well done. Great composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-14 (516) Railway bridge over Ybbs River in Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-14 (592) Schiffmeisterhaus Schiffmeisterplatz 3 at Ybbs an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (117) Annaberger Haus at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

File:2010-05-14 Feuerwehrhausumbau Weißenburg (1).jpg

File:2010-05-14 Feuerwehrhausumbau Weißenburg (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:D2:1F30:A88:7394:2092:C017:1EB2 19:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-25 (102) Lindner Geotrac 73 in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-25 (103) Caterpillar grader in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-25 (107) Caterpillar grader in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-11-14 (614) Ybbs an der Donau.jpg

File:2017-11-14 (614) Ybbs an der Donau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aetherophon (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-16 (704) Two Yamaha FJR 1300 in Pfunds, Tyrol, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-16 (707) Old bicycle in Pfunds, Tyrol, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-16 (716) Plaque of Johann Michael Perktold in Pfunds, Tyrol, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Sortierung nach Jahreszahl

Hallo GT1976, eine alleinige Sortierung nach formalen Kriterien, die nicht offensichtlich sind, wie etwa Denkmalschutz oder Jahr der Aufnahme, halte ich für problematisch. Sucht man ein Foto, muss man dann mehrere Jahreszahlkategorien durchsuchen, etwa Category:2018_in_Pfunds. Du kannst gerne nach Jahreszahl zusätzlich kategorisieren, wenn dir das so viel Spaß macht, aber könntest du bitte mindestens eine inhaltlich sinnvolle Kategorie vergeben / lassen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Ich finde eigentlich kein Bild, wo Category:xxxx_in_Pfunds alleine steht. Vielleicht habe ich aber irrtümlich was verschoben, statt ergänzt. --GT1976 (talk) 14:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Habs schon gefunden, sorry. --GT1976 (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Frage an den Mostviertler

Kannst du das File:Sigrid Dirndl S.png korrekt zuordnen. hier ist es Stössing. In Wikipedia ist es unter der de:Kornelkirsche aber Michlbach. Die Kat ist anders als die Bezeichnung - vielleicht findest du da mehr heraus. bzw. findets du bessere Fotos. danke lg K@rl (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Ich glaube, dass es laut Koodinaten in Hochstraß (KG der Gemeinde Stössing) ist. Persönlich war ich noch nie dort. Vielleicht wüsste der Herrr im Impressum dieser Website bescheid, ich nehme an, dass er das Foto gemacht hat. --GT1976 (talk) 04:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-09-03 (100) Vehicles of Freiwillige Feuerwehr Altenmarkt, Yspertal, Lower Austria, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The roof line of the building could have been sharper. But for me the photo is good enough.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-09-03 (105) Vehicles of Freiwillige Feuerwehr Altenmarkt, Yspertal, Lower Austria, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (114) View from Tirolerkogel to Ötscher, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-21 (205) Front of 1099.06 at Bahnhof Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-07-28 (124) Liquid manure trailer at Haltgraben, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok to me --Carschten 21:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-21 (227) Alex. Friedmann narrow gauge wagon bearing at Bahnhof Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Bemerkungen

was sind bei den Bemerkungen in File:2018-09-14 (703) KLF-A Schwarzenbach an der Pielach and MTF-A Schwarzenbach an der Pielach (2010) at Unterabschnitts-Übung at Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg die beiden Jahreszahlen 2008 und 2010? kann Baujahr, kann Indienststellung sein, aber beides nur für Insider - ich wüerde sie weglassen. --lg K@rl (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Es ist das Baujahr. Ich habe es vermerkt, weil die FF Schwarzenbach aktuell ein zweites MTF (Baujahr 2003) hat und vor 2008 ein anderes KLF-A hatte. Ich glaube, es war ein LT 35, müsste aber gezielt suchen. --GT1976 (talk) 12:37, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Okay, ich würde noch in die Caregorybeschreibung dazuschreiben, worum es bei der Übung ging. Die Fotos sind dann aussagekräftiger. --K@rl (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Gleich nochwas, wannst schon dran bist :-) - hast net Zeit für die freiwilligenmesse, siehe de:WP:Niederösterreich --K@rl (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Ich kanns leider noch nicht sagen. :-) --GT1976 (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-09-14 (501) Mercedes-Benz Actros 1845 of Pillar trans at ASFINAG Raststation Viehdorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit of sharpening could help, but still ok --Poco a poco 17:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-20 (114) Kléber Krisalp HP2 185-60 R 15 84 T tire with Renault hubcap at Park and Ride Bahnhof Stockerau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 23:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Charles Moulin‎

Redundant categories

Dear GT1976, I've seen that you removed the painter Charles Moulin‎ from Category:Painters from France. Now the artist is in Category:Charles Moulin. The pictures of this Category refer to two different persons: an actor and a painter. Please, I'd like to put each one in his proper place. Can you help me? Thank you very much. --Antonella (talk) 08:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Antonella Nigro! Thanks for your information. I originally only moved the category. Now I have separated them. Please see if it fits from your point of view. Best regards from Austria: --GT1976 (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks! Now it's very good. I added <Category:Painters from France by name> too, but I'm not sure to be as good as you. I think it will be even better to add some tag or category to help users to reach them easly (id est in generic searching, or checking some France painter, or actor); what do you think about it? Best regards from Roma! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonella Nigro (talk • contribs) 09:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

To find a lot, many categories should be created and filled. Redundant categories should not be createt. Best regards from Lower Austria, where in the morning we had hoar frost. :-), --GT1976 (talk) 10:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC).

Ok, my dear. Thank you very much for your help and congratulations for your photographs! Today here is a sunny day, but not too hot. Perfect! All the best! --Antonella (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-19 (438) Rail tracks at Bahnhof Wilhelmsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-21 (161) Railway point at Bahnhof Waidhofen an der Ybbs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (174) Fingerposts at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (354) Ruine at Jakobskogel at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (165) Fingerposts near Seehütte at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (357) Ruine at Jakobskogel at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (211) Carlina acaulis (stemless carline thistle) at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-09-14 (703) KLF-A Schwarzenbach an der Pielach (Baujahr 2008) and MTF-A Schwarzenbach an der Pielach (Baujahr 2010) at Unterabschnitts-Übung at Haltgraben, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be a little sharper in the background, though --Daniel Case 16:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (209) Carlina acaulis (stemless carline thistle) at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (369) Turnbuckles and love padlock (without technical funktion), HM Müllner, Article numer 400-50 on the summit cross of the Jakobskogel at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (304) Playground at the valley station of the Raxseilbahn at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (208) Carlina acaulis (stemless carline thistle) at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (213) Gatterl Kreuz and view to Schneeberg at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (174) Murauer Beer crates and transport pallet piles at Seehütte at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-19 (441) Vehicles at Park and Ride at Bahnhof Wilhelmsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (324) Fingerposts at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (356) Ruine at Jakobskogel at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Should be brighter IMO --Ermell 11:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (406) Suzuki Samurai at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (135) Ruine at Jakobskogel at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10 (181) Vehicles of Freiwillige Feuerwehr St. Georgen an der Leys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (131) Fritz Benesch Memorial at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (141) Rock stack landmarks at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Frage im RW

Hallo RW, kannst du einmal kurz auf deine DS im RW schauen. --lg K@rl (talk) 08:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-22 (302) Train station platform at Bahnhof Gedersdorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

EU in früheren Zeiten

Hallo GT1976, habe deine EU nach Jahr Kategorie an einigen Stellen rausgeschmissen. Etwa hier: [5]. Diese Kategorie macht nur Sinn, wenn erstens die EU schon besteht und zweitens das Land schon Mitglied der EU ist. Siehe de:Europäische_Union und de:Erweiterung_der_Europäischen_Union#Vierte_Erweiterung_(EFTA-Erweiterung)_EU_1995 für die genauen Stichtagsdaten. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 01:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo und Servus. Danke, es ist eh gscheiter so. Mir sind diese eigenartigen Kategorien auch aufgefallen, habe sie aber so weiter verwendet bzw. kopiert, weil sie scheinbar schon bei anderen Jahren (wo es die EU noch nicht gegeben hat) vorgegeben waren. Ich war der Meinung, dass hier die (recht unlogische) Systematik besteht, dass in diesem Bereich die historischen Jahre nach heutigen Grenzen gegliedert sind, so, wie es offenbar auch z. B. hier gehandhabt wurde und wird: Category:1943_in_Austria, Category:1880 in the European Union, Category:1942 in Yugoslavia, Category:1908 in Austria, Category:1532_in_the_United_States. --GT1976 (talk) 04:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

ich wäre vorsichtig, Category:1943 in Austria in Category:1943 in Germany umzulegen, würde mehr schaden als nutzen. Bei Category:1908 in Austria kann man drüber reden, aber wenn die Bilder aus der Bukowina dann in Category:1908 in Austria-Hungary landen, wäre das auch schädlich. Ich würde das Thema mal auf die EU beschränken. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Lagerhaus Loosdorf

Hallo GT1976, du hast das Lagerhaus in Loosdorf (https://goo.gl/maps/TW1uNhkY9AA2) dem Raiffeisen-Konzern untergejubelt. An den beiden Bildern ist kein Giebelkreuz erkennbar, im Web bin ich auch nicht fündig geworden. Jetzt gehört ja vieles zu Raiffeisen, aber noch nicht alles. Hast du eine nachvollziehbare Begründung, warum es sich um ein Raiffeisen Lagerhaus handeln sollte? lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Servus Herzi Pinki! Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit. Meines Wissens gehören alle Lagerhäuser in dieser Region zum Raiffeisen-Lagerhaus Mostviertel Mitte eGen (https://www.lagerhaus-mostviertelmitte.at/). Die meisten örtlichen Lagerhäuser wurden in letzter Zeit zu voneinander unabhängigen Raiffeisen-Lagerhaus-Genossenschaften vereint, so z. B. auch in St. Pölten (https://www.lagerhaus-stpoelten.at/genossenschaft+2500++1997392). Es ist nun die Frage, wie wir diese Filialen benennen? Die Malereien und Aufschriften an den Lagerhausbauten sind, glaub ich, kein Hinweis auf die aktuelle Struktur oder Firmenbezeichnung der Lagerhäuser. Vor allem bei geschlossenen Lagerhäusern änderte bei den Türmen keiner mehr die Aufschriften und Logos. Eine Möglichkeit wäre, diese Lagerhäuser nur mit Lagerhaus XY zu bezeichnen. Man könnte sie dann eventuell noch mit einer Überkategorie z. B. Raiffeisen-Lagerhaus Mostviertel Mitte oder Lagerhaus Mostviertel Mitte zusammen legen. Problematisch wäre allerdings die Zuordnung der Lagerhäuser, die früher z. B. selbstständig waren, dann in eine Region kamen, später in eine andere Region wechselten und nun geschlossen sind. Die selbe Strukturproblematik ist übrigens auch bei den örtlichen Bankstellen vorhanden. Ich würde bei der Gelegenheit auch die Bahnhofsüberkategorien entfernen. Früher wurden Lagerhäuser aus logistigschen Gründen beim Bahnhof gebaut. Heute gibt es außer der nachbarschaftlichen Lage keinen Bezug zum jeweiligen Bahnhof. --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Die Bezeichnung des Lagerhauses habe ich unter http://www.yspertal.gv.at/Siloplanenentsorgung gefunden - mir scheint sonst der Silo, bzw. das ganze lagerhaus nicht mehr aktiv zu sein, denn unter Mostviertel Mitte gibt es scheinbar diesen Standort nicht mehr. --K@rl ([[User talk:Karl Gruber|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:06, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Danke Karl, dort steht Raiff.-Lagerhaus Loosdorf (Hürmerstr. 1) - ist wohl damit geklärt. --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Ich persönlich glaube, dass es ein Raiffeisen-Lagerhaus ist. Den Link der Gemeinde bzw. vom Gemeindeverband für Umweltschutz und Abgabeneinhebung wäre für mich als Quelle für den Unternehmenswortlaut nicht relevant. Diese Ortsangaben dienen nur dazu, dass die Bevölkerung weiß, wo sie entsorgen muss. Ob das Lagerhaus noch aktive ist, ob es zu einer Regionalgenossenschaft gehört, oder ob sie ein eigenes Lagerhaus ist (ohne die Bezeichnung Raiffeisen) würde ich daraus nicht ableiten.

Hallo GT1976, die Grundfrage ist dank der Hilfe von Karl geklärt. Ich bin halt vorsichtig, wenn ich das allgegenwärtige Giebelkreuz mal nicht entdecke. Ich möchte dich bitten, von einer weiteren kategoriemäßigen Unterteilung der Raiffeisen-Lagerhaus-Kategorien abzusehen. Die Organisationsstruktur von Raiffeisen in den Commons-Kategorien abbilden zu wollen, ist zu viel des Guten. Sieh es einfach mehr als Gebäude denn als Organisationseinheit von Raiffeisen, die Zuordnung zur Geografie erfolgt ja über Gemeinde- und Bezirkskategorien. Die Zuordnung (des Gebäudes) zum Bahnhof würde ich dort belassen, wo sie gegeben ist. Auch, weil die Bilder der Lagerhäuser selten ohne Bahnhofsteile daherkommen. lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:17, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:Ping Ob ein eigenes Kategoriesystem notwendig ist, ist eine Frage. Die Verbindung mit dem Bahnhof würde ich so nicht mehr stehen lassen. Wenn auch die alten landschaftsprägenden Silotürme zumeist an der Bahn stehen - es ist da schon meist ein eigener Bahnanschluss und nur mehr die Nachbarschaft zum Bahnhof erkennbar - sind heute die Lagerhäuser mehrheitlich nicht an die Bahn gebunden und ziehen vermehrt an die Straßenverbindungen. Also auch Bahngelegene Lagerhäuser würde ich nur mehr bei der Bahn und beim Ort und nicht mehr beim Bahnhof kategorisieren. --K@rl ([[User talk:Karl Gruber|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Ich denke auch, dass eine eigene Kategorisierung der Lagerhausstruktur derzeit nicht notwendig ist. Bezüglich Verbindung mit dem Bahnhof, sehe ich es genau so, wie Karl. Viele Bahnhöfe sind aufgelassen oder die Gütergleise sind beriets abgetragen oder inaktiv, weil viel mehr auf Straße transportiert wird. Allein die Nachbarschaft mit den Bahnhöfen sollte kein Grund sein, zur Kategorieverbindung mit den Bahnhöfen. Nach dieser Systematik müsste ja Liechtenstein auch eine Unterkategorie von Österreich sein. :-) --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Teilweise werden die Pfarrkirchen weiß Gott wo nach den bis 1850 besitzenden Stiften kategorisiert. Dort wäre eine Entkopplung sinniger als bei den Lagerhäusern und Bahnhöfen. Nur so. lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:07, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Mir is es ja eh egal. Aber einen fehlerhafen Zusammenhang lassen, weil es noch fehlerhafterne gibt, begeistert mich auch nicht sehr. :-) --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Pinus mugo

Hi GT - unfortunately, you've added an incorrect English name to your Pinus mugo photos; it is Mountain Pine, not "creeping pine" - I've edited the text, but not the filenames; might be best to just remove the English name from those altogether and just leave the scientific name in the filename. Hope this helps! - MPF ([[User talk:MPF|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

OK, thank you für the information! :-) --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Danke schön! MPF ([[User talk:MPF|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Incorrect category change

You recently moved a large number of images from Category:Summer Solstice Parade 2018 to Category:Solstice Cyclists in 2018. At least at a quick glance, many of the images you moved have nothing to do with the Solstice Cyclists. This is the case for the first 6 images I've checked:

• File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - 202 (42536280695).jpg
• File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - 216-Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence (43440032441).jpg
• File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - 223-Rainbow City Band (43392280202).jpg
• File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - 232 (43401870872).jpg
• File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - 242 (41647253230).jpg
• File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - 254 (41647289290).jpg

What was your intent here? I'm inclined to just revert these all; are there some that you believe were correct, or what? - Jmabel ! talk 00:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello! I apologize, I had a mistake here, which I have now put right again. I hope it fits again. --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

I think you "overcorrected": e.g. File:2018 Fremont Solstice Parade - cyclists prepare 009.jpg belongs in Category:Solstice Cyclists in 2018, but now you moved it to Category:Summer Solstice Parade 2018. But, tell you what: let me fix that (and some others), since I took these and know which is which. I just wanted to makes sure you didn't have some intent I hadn't grasped, before I tried fixing this. - Jmabel ! talk 06:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

OK, thank you and best regards from Austria. --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Men and women

I notice you have categorized some italian Businessmen as Businesswomen, that is. Ketil3 ([[User talk:Ketil3|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for the info, because I was obviously wrong in the line. I will correct it. --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Bilderwunsch Frankenfels

z.B. fehlende Bilder um Frankenfels --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC) --QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) ([[User talk:Manfred Werner (WMAT)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Sophie Opel.jpg

Wenn diese kleinteiligen Kategorien schon unbedingt nötig sind, dann bitte etwas vorsichtiger sein ;o) Schöne Grüße _{•  • hugarheimur} 22:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

OK, danke für die Info. --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Nachfrage

File:2017-07-15 (213) Altar with sculptures at Marienkapelle in Zell am See, Austria.jpg hast du eigentlich die Beschreibung des Altars rechts unten lesbar abfotografiert? Da wüsste man dann mehr, wer das Marienbild gemalt hat, wen die beiden Medaillons seitlich darstellen, wer sie gemalt hat, aus welchem Jahr der Altar stammt, wer ihn gebaut, gestiftet, etc. hat. Es ist übrigens mE nicht notwendig, bei jeder Änderung / Ergänzung der Beschreibung auch den Dateinamen zu ändern, Marienkapelle, Zell am See und laufende Nummer würde mE reichen. Rein geschmackliche Änderungen belasten die BEOs. Guten Rutsch und ein Schönes 2019. lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Servus! Leider habe ich keine weiteren Fotos und daher auch keine Infos darüber. Ich wünsche auch einen guten Start ins Jahr 2019! --GT1976 ([[User talk:GT1976#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted