Impru20

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Impru20!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Hi there!

Hi, I don’t Know if you would read this, but i edited some pages of spanish politics.

I edited an hour ago the 2004 People’s party leadership election page, I’m Spanish and member of this party and I know exactly what happened.

I introduced some names of candidates that declined to run and you delete my editions commenting “???”

Do you know anything of spanish politics? Because you have deleted a very good edit and i think you are very wrong.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.126.116.227 (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Presidente Mariano Rajoy Brey 2012 - La Moncloa (Recortada).jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Presidente Mariano Rajoy Brey 2012 - La Moncloa (Recortada).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Turkish Polls for Elec. Nov 2015.png

Hello, the values appear to be drastically different for this graph. I was wondering if you could generate 5 new graphs (per party). It should have elements based on company so that we can follow consecutive polling on a company by company basis. Some of these companies seem to have drastically different polling results making a trend assessment impossible. Thanks. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 14:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

File:ElectionAverageGraphGermanyNext.PNG

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Impru20. Would it be possible for you to update this file, please? Regards, Moonraker (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:OpinionPollingSpainGeneralElection2015.png

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Impru20. Congratulations for your excellent work, but I suggest smooth trend lines. I made an example of smoothing for a 15-day moving average: File:Opinion_Polling_for_Spain_General_Election_2015.png I have not replaced your graphic because I think you are doing a great work, so I prefer to you continue to take the initiative. Thank you! --Vigi (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Artur Mas 2011 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Artur Mas 2011 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Asqueladd (talk) 15:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Graphical Summary

Hello, Impru20! I saw your graphical summaries for opinion polls, they are really good. Do you have kinda program or tutorial how to do GS like that? Thanks, Mirashhh.

Poll graphic

How did you that?

SVG version of election graph

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Impru20,

could you upload a svg version of File:ElectionAverageGraphItalyNext.PNG? Since the graph seems to be created using R it should be that complicated. See the source code at File:UK EU referendum polling.svg as an example for creating svgs in R. Thank you very much, -- T.seppelt (talk) 11:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Pablo Iglesias 2016d (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pablo Iglesias 2016d (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Need update

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, can you update https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OpinionPollingGreeceGeneralElectionNext.png thanks — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 176.233.130.99 (talk) 14:43, 04 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Script for File:ElectionAverageGraphItalyNext.PNG

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Impru20,

could you send me the script you used to create File:ElectionAverageGraphItalyNext.PNG (or publish it on the file's description page)? I would like to create a similar one and couldn't figure out how to create these trendlines. Thank you in advance,

-- T.seppelt (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

How do you make the same polling graph that you’re using for italy and spain for Canada Produda (talk) 19:12, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Cs-Pedro-Sanchez-PSOE-ratificado EDIIMA20160229 0270 18.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Cs-Pedro-Sanchez-PSOE-ratificado EDIIMA20160229 0270 18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _talk 17:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Rajoy-Rivera-convencer-Sanchez-facil EDIIMA20160831 0368 4.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Rajoy-Rivera-convencer-Sanchez-facil EDIIMA20160831 0368 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _talk 18:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Rajoy-Rivera-comienzan-ambiente-distendido EDIIMA20160810 0077 4.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Rajoy-Rivera-comienzan-ambiente-distendido EDIIMA20160810 0077 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _talk 18:37, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Italian general election

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can you update File:ElectionAverageGraphItalyNext.PNG? It was not updated for months. I want a new version already. Also the German one and upload the Dutch one (seat projections, not percentages)--SMB99thx (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Greek elections Polls

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OpinionPollingGreeceGeneralElectionNext.png Update this please.--91.221.154.117 22:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Basque Parliament election, 2001 results.svg

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello,

This name is more descriptive and I didn't see the set of pictures... do you have examples ?

BR

--Scoopfinder^(d) 13:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

And I just saw that Armbrust refused the renaming for the same reason... --Scoopfinder^(d) 13:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Pedro Antonio Sánchez 2016 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pedro Antonio Sánchez 2016 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Asqueladd (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Pedro Sánchez logo 2017.png

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pedro Sánchez logo 2017.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _talk 17:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:OpinionPollingGreeceGeneralElectionNext.png requires updating

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Impru20,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:OpinionPollingGreeceGeneralElectionNext.png is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. HapHaxion (talk) 15:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

poll tracker (Italian general election)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Needs updating again. An update would be very much appreciated. 62.252.189.70 14:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Map on Catalonia Republic

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of South Korea said that "We support the intergrated spain and hope that problem of Catalonia will be resolved peacefully within the constitutional order of Spanish constitution". Therefore, in this map, please include South Korea in "States not recognizing the Catalan Republic"--고려 (talk) 12:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm really grateful to you. :D--고려 (talk) 12:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:InternationalRecognitionofCatalonia.svg

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Western Sahara is disputed. Please remove it from the map with Morocco. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:51, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think using international recognized borders for Egypt, Ukraine, and Morocco is better. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Corsica is an autonomous entity. I think its position is a notorious information for international recognition. Please take this to the talk page of the image for a discussion with all users. Dartsss (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Mariano Rajoy 2017c (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mariano Rajoy 2017c (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

acagastya 08:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:InternationalRecognitionofCatalonia.svg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See my edit requests in File talk:InternationalRecognitionofCatalonia.svg, please. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.92.177.4 (talk) 20:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:InternationalRecognitionofCatalonia.svg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:InternationalRecognitionofCatalonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SubRE (talk) 07:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, ¿puedes, por favor, incluir la plantilla {{LicenseReview}} en las imágenes que subas desde la web de La Moncloa? Así se pueden validad y no habrá problemas de borrado por desaparición de fuente en el futuro. Gracias --Discasto _talk 09:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Historia de España

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Saludos y gracias compañero por tus aportes!!! ^^ Podrías colgar CUANDO PUEDAS algunas de estas fotos?

GRACIAS!!! --Campeones 2008 (talk) 17:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Javier Esparza UPN 2015.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Javier Esparza UPN 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Discasto _talk 21:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

History1245789

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi! I reported him as a vandal. You could give more info about your evidence on that page. Thanks for the information!. --Sfs90 (talk) 16:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Well, vandalizing the request only make things worse for that vandal. Let's wait for the resolution, meanwhile we have to publish all their vandalisms to keep all evidence possible for the administrators. --Sfs90 (talk) 16:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:María Antonia Martínez (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:María Antonia Martínez (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source deleted, copyvio

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

LMLM (talk) 18:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Inés Arrimadas 2017 (cropped).jpg

And also:

File:Inés Arrimadas, durante la entrevista con eldiario.es.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sandlazaro (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

NF Color

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seem an user is trying to change the french National Front color from dark blue to grey. A discussion has been started on the template page after I asked. You're welcome to give your opinion there as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:National_Front_(France)/meta/color#Color --Aréat (talk) 21:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

?????

Latest comment: 6 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Dear Impru20,
Why did you remove the modification on File:OpinionPollingSpainGeneralElection2016.png ? This file is uselessly overlarge, spanning more one year after the end of the election, a time when obviously there is no more poll about this election… In addition, several months are repeated several times (I then assume that they probably don't correspond to the beginning of the month, but we can't know what they actually correspond to since only the month is given…). You are invited to come and discuss these and other problems of your file here: fr:Wikipédia:Atelier graphique/Images à améliorer#Graphique inutilement long.
Thank you in advance.
Best regards.
SenseiAC (talk) 01:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I reiterate the comments done by SenseiAC. Could you please explain why you keep reverting modification on this picture. Like articles, pictures are editable by everyone on Commons. Plus, in this case, the length doesn't seem to make any sense... Thank you for your understanding. Triton (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Triton: Just as they are editable, you are also free to upload your own version of the pic into a separate file without overriding already existing files. Indeed, not only you are free to do it, but also, you are required to upload it as a new file when it involves substantial or major changes. This is an actual Wikimedia Commons guideline. Thank you. Impru20 (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Of course. But apparently this modification is necessary to make the file usable since the elections stopped in 2016. People don't want to alter your work just for fun but to improve it. Triton (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Triton: No, this modification is not "necessary to make the file usable". Indeed, some of the crops did actually decrease the quality of the pic (such as this). The image as it is has a purpose: to allow it to be more easily comparable to the trend lines of charts for opinion polling in other elections, at least in the English wiki. Anyway, COM:OVERWRITE is very clear. If you want a cropped version of the image, upload it as a new file. Do not overwrite the currently existing file, as it implies a substantial change of it. Impru20 (talk) 07:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your chart may be useful if at least the axis of the date was meaningful. Here the date are actually random dates, impossible to determine, at the middle of the month, and are therefore not useful to compare anything since we actually don't know what we actually have. Also, I don't understand why you want one full year of nothing in your chart. SenseiAC (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

@SenseiAC: The chart as it is right now is useful for comparing trend lines in the English wikipedia. If you want it without such blank space, upload your cropped version as a new file. And if you don't like the current chart, then make your own one with the polling data (it is not difficult). Really, I don't understand what is so difficult about it that you want to persistently overwrite an already existing file as if there was no other choice. Impru20 (talk) 09:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok, now we get the reason why (yet I don't see any article where there is a comparison...anyway). No need to bite, we are all here to improve and help things, nothing more. Good continuation. Triton (talk) 13:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:És el moment.png

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:És el moment.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Eusko Alkartasuna (logo).jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Eusko Alkartasuna (logo).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Podemos-iu.png

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Podemos-iu.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Podemosiu.png

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Podemosiu.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:UnidosPodemosLogo.png

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:UnidosPodemosLogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Por favor

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Cuando uses {{Attribution-La Moncloa}}, pon también {{LicenseReview}}. Gracias --Discasto _talk 10:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Diagram of parliamentary spanish elections

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Buenos días. Acabo de ver sus modificaciones y no sé porque lo ha hecho? Ahora hay imagenes en doble (CLM y La Rioja) que pueden incurrir en supresión ya que son identicas... --FructidorAn3 (talk) 12:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:SpainProvinceMapCongress1977.png

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The colors of UDC and PNV are almost the same. Is this intentional or would it make sense to use a different color scheme for PNV? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shuageo (talk • contribs) 04:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Shuageo: Intentional. UCD's is typically represented in dark green, whereas PNV's colour is green. There's little we can do here unless you want to use a colour not actually used by either party, which I do not favour. Impru20 (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Logo

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, veo que mejoraste este logo y que dominas la edición de logotipos. Podrías colgar en una sola imagen este logo al lado de este otro? Sería para Socialists and United to Advance Parliamentary Group (Q56747465). Gracias --Davidpar (disc.) 17:00, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mapa de resultados Andalucía

Hola! Estaba viendo las páginas de las elecciones en Andalucía en 2015 y 2012 y quería preguntarte acerca del gráfico de mapa con diagrama de sectores (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AndalusiaProvinceMapR2012.PNG). ¿Con qué programa lo realizas? Es que me vendría genial para un trabajo de investigación. Muchas gracias! --Alberto Espinosa 02:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Francisco Serrano 2019 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Francisco Serrano 2019 (cropped).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Francisco Serrano 2019 (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Gráfico de Elecciones de España 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, te escribo para saber si ya has colocado en el gráfico File:OpinionPollingSpainGeneralElection2019.png que Vox se posicionó como tercera fuerza política, según esta encuesta. Saludos!.--LuisZ9 (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:José Ignacio Ceniceros 2016 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:José Ignacio Ceniceros 2016 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:José Ignacio Ceniceros 2016 (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Strakhov (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Data source for File:OpinionPollingSpainGeneralElection2019.png

The Source says "Own work". Although the beautiful graph was made by you, @Impru20, I believe the source of the poll data should also be included in the metadata of this file as Source. Is it one source? several sources? which are them? This is important for fact-checking and better dissemination of information. Thanks!

Italy

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you make a chart for the coalitions, thanks Braganza (talk) 16:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Sandra Gómez 2017 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sandra Gómez 2017 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: http://www.elperiodicodeaqui.com/pdfs/5_10_18/valencia.pdf

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Warning

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This applies to you. That is a parliament diagram of a municipal election in Alcalá de Henares. Thus the categorisation is appropiate. I don't know if a further specific category for "parliament diagrams of municipal elections in Alcalá de Henares" is necessary (vis-à-vis the subset of "parliament diagrams of municipal elections in Alcalá de Henares created by Impru20"?). But that's up to you not to anyone else. You don't own the content of categories named "parliament diagram of municipal elections".--Asqueladd (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand. The only hostile and disruptive behaviour in here is yours. You are unable to accept different versions of a parliament diagram categorised in the same generic category (whose content you don't own). For some reason you seem to think only files uploaded by you can be included in a category of parliament diagrams of municipal elections. Stop this nonsense.--Asqueladd (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

As I have told you. If you have interest in any particular obscure subset then create a subcategory with a descriptive name (Category:Parliament diagrams of municipal elections in Alcalá de Henares (english wikipedia schema)?) but don't co-opt any generic category, because that's the single disruptive behaviour in here.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Renaming files

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I am here to discuss with you about the renaming of File:OpinionPollingSpainGeneralElection1996.png and other similar files. I personally think that the new name File:Opinion Polling of Spain General Election 1996.png is better as the space inbetween the word makes it a clearer representation of what the file is about. Do want to listen to you opinion to as you are the uploader of the files. 大诺史 (talk) 11:33, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that :) 大诺史 (talk) 11:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons_talk:File_renaming#Move war: 大诺史 and CAPTAIN_RAJU vs Impru20. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Overwriting existing files

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I recently undertook your recent rename requests. I would appreciate if you could read the above link guidance page, and look to follow that guidance and update the renamed pages accordingly to reflect that nature of their more dynamic updates. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Images

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is public domain the thing I should be searching for? Rodrigospascoal (talk) 19:38, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

To delete vs to remove

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

	before	after
An image is removed:	United States	↦ United States
An image is deleted:		↦ File:Lal wilson J.jpg

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Incnis Mrsi: This user uploaded those images in order to put them in a Wikipedia article. I removed those from there, and this user tried to undo the deletion request here because they didn't want to have their images removed from that article. Yes, "delete" could also have been used, but "remove" is a correct word here considering that, in context, I was referring to such a situation as well. Impru20 (talk) 11:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Stop reverting without reason!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Impru20, if you are using colors to represent parties and they are not correct, do not reverse true editions that put them the authentic colours. Arguing "if you don't like it, upload another file" is not valid and even less if the file is not even yours. That is not the first time you make this and, please, respect the editors' contributions, especially if they are to improve the article and to correct mistakes. --Alberto Espinosa 17:54, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:InternationalRecognitionofCatalonia.svg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:InternationalRecognitionofCatalonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

FOARP (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Pablo Casado 2019c (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pablo Casado 2019c (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roy17 (talk) 23:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

COM:OVERWRITE

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Sorry for the inconvenience caused, only with the constant change between CpM and PP I replaced the file and the trend changed. I will still take your advice. It will not happen again. Regards.--LuisZ9 (talk) 23:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

OpinionPolling

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is the name of the application you use to make moving average line diagrams like the ones you make and upload?--2A02:587:4D2F:AE00:C8B6:CDB9:79:8756 15:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Which software for trendlines?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, may I know which software/script/code you use to create poll trendlines?--3512495a (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mónica García

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, estos últimos días he estado subiendo imágenes de Mónica García que creía que tenían la licencia correcta pero no la tenían. Hoy he encontrado esta entrevista de elDiario.es https://www.eldiario.es/madrid/monica-garcia-si-ayuso-sale-fracaso-secundario_1_7329831.html con imágenes de Mónica García. Creo que tiene la licencia creative commons correcta, y las iba a subir, pero he visto que otras imágenes obtenidas de elDiario.es tienen mejor resolución de la que aparece en la web. Si pudieras subir esas imágenes con buena resolución estaría encantado. Gracias de antemano. :) --Basque mapping (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Congress: Elec.maps of municipalities per region

I thought, that an ignorant idiot deleted Your great maps (as it happened to mine) at the Results-BreakDowns. Now i am glad, that i found them again! Would make me happy, if You completed them with adding Valenciana and Castile&Leon and the 2019s - a lot of work, i know, but appreciated! Agricola Planitius (talk)Agricola Planitius

File:Jéssica Albiach 2019 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Jéssica Albiach 2019 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:07, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Javier Remírez 2019 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Javier Remírez 2019 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 15:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Parliament_diagrams_for_Spanish_regional_elections

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Parliament diagrams for Spanish regional elections has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 19:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Next Italian General Election

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! Requesting an update to your graph for opinion polling for the 2023 Italian General Election as your last update was in July, and since then, a new party has emerged in first place in polling. Thanks! B. M. L. Peters (talk) 08:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Luis Tudanca 2019b (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Luis Tudanca 2019b (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Luis Mariano Santos 2019 (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Luis Mariano Santos 2019 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:12, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:CastileLeónProvinceMapCortes2022.png

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Buenas Impru20, nada una preguntica rápida sobre el mapa: ¿Al final Soria Ya iba en coalición con EV? Porque según las fuentes cuando estuvimos viendo en hacer el artículo de esWiki yo entendí como que SY se presentaba únicamente y que, en todo caso, haría grupo parlamentario en las cortes con EV, pero que no se presentaba con ellos. Entonces no sé si sería lo más correcto ponerlo como si hubiese ido en coalición. Que también he visto que hay periódicos que lo tratan como si sí. No sé qué será lo más correcto, la verdad. — Lector d Wiki (talk) 07:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Buenos días @Lector d Wiki: . ¡Sí! Es que es una situación particular, pues no son una coalición per se con el resto de EV, pero sí forman parte de la misma alianza/plataforma global. En la página de resultados aparecen diferenciados, pero luego en los medios y en muchas encuestas se les muestra juntos o, cuanto menos, con la coletilla "SY-EV" o derivadas. El caso es muy similar al de Unidas Podemos con ECP y demás confluencias, por lo que se le está dando el mismo tratamiento para mantener la coherencia. ¡Un saludo! Impru20 (talk) 07:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

2004 People’s Party of Spain congress

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there!

Hi, I don’t Know if you would read this, but i edited some pages of spanish politics.

I edited an hour ago the 2004 People’s party leadership election page, I’m Spanish and member of this party and I know exactly what happened.

I introduced some names of candidates that declined to run and you delete my editions commenting “???”

Do you know anything of spanish politics? Because you have deleted a very good edit and i think you are very wrong.

Thanks 84.126.116.227 19:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Graphical summary

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Impru20. My name is Jurajec6 and I am user involved mainly in the Slovak politics. I saw that you uploaded a great graphical summaries for the next Spanish and Italian parliamentary elections. The article with polls for the next Slovak parliamentary election currently lacks such a graphical summary. Since I'm not experienced in creating and editing graphs outside of Wikipedia, I can't change it. But I really like your work. So I just wanted to say and ask if you could create a similar one for Slovakia if you were bored, or at least give us your know-how.

Best regards! Jurajec6 (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Need update

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, my name is Danielfpq and I am an unexperienced wikipedia.it user. I've noticed that the graph that is being used for the opinion polling for the next Italian general election is not updated. As the elections approach and a page in Italian will surely be created, the graph should be put up to date for clarity and general understanding. Thank you in advance,

Kind regards, --Danielfpq (talk) 21:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Update Graph

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, it has been 3 months since the Next Greek Election Graph has been updated and 18 more polls have been released since then. If we could try to keep regularly updating these graphs that would be helpful. Otherwise I am willing to produce a regularly updated graph for the polling. Thank you. CoaxAndBotany (talk) 00:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Will work on it today. Thank you! Impru20 (talk) 08:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Madrid update

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi @Impru20, there's a new Madrid regional election poll out. Please update the graph when you get the time. Thanks Quinnnnnby (talk) 13:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, thank you, I'll do it as soon as I can. Please note that one thing is that charts are outdated by a couple months, another thing is to keep asking for an update every time a new poll comes out. That the chart update is not absolutely immediate does not mean that it won't happen soon. Thanks! Impru20 (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

How do I create a polling graph?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Impru20! I was wondering how I can create general election polling graphs like the ones you'ng ve been creating/updating? I was asking because I feel that the 2023 Ecuadorian general election's English wiki article would benefit from having a polling graph. Thanks! TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Share graph code

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey Impru20, I was wondering whether you could share the R code. I'm curious about the specific method of local regression used, and I'd like to learn some more about ggplot. Additionally, I could help you update it from time to time, alleviating your work. Best, Tomé Tome.rodriguez (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Archivo:Catalunya_En_Comú_2021_logo.svg

Latest comment: 7 months ago15 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Impru20, in https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Catalunya_En_Com%C3%BA_2021_logo.svg you change de colour because "In the sourced website this logo is not shown with any particular colour", but the statutes of Catalunya en Comú establish on page 7 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gOOaxAkTAyk6L7vzwqgUp5DHqJFDHG6C/view) that the party's corporate colors are vermilion ([[1]]) and purple ([[2]]). I've reverted your edit. Fliz82 (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Fliz82; as it says in your marvelous source, the party has several official colours (not a single one). It also shows a black version of the logo in page 7 (where it shows six other versions). I have thus reverted your edit, since black is the most neutral colour here, instead of your cherry-picking of one of these (why should we choose purple and not vermillion, exactly? We should we favour one of the official colours over the others?). Cheers! Impru20 (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Black is used in one-ink editions such as electoral ballots, there is no source where the party uses that color while there are multiple examples of the use of purple. Please, stop gaming and respect the corporate image of Catalunya En Comú above your, in this case irrelevant, personal beliefs. Thanks.

https://twitter.com/CatEnComu_/photo

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=227979786189129&set=a.227979779522463

https://www.instagram.com/catencomu/ Fliz82 (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Fliz82: You provided a source where black is clearly used in the logos together with the other ones. Your source, the party's statutes, use black. The same source clearly states that, if anything, when it comes to pick a colour then vermillion is the main colour over purple, yet you ignore your own source and cherry-pick purple as the main colour to show, for the sake of it. Yes, the party uses purple and vermillion interchangeably (as well as black or even neutral shades). Curiously, since your own initial, authority source proved you wrong, now you seemingly cherry-pick more sources to support your claim and ignore facts, while dubbing my arguments as "irrelevant". No, my friend: this is your own "irrelevant, personal beliefs. Thanks". Cheers! Impru20 (talk) 15:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

On the website itself you can see that they use purple.

https://www.catalunyaencomu.cat/index.php/ca/premsa/catalunya-en-comu-engega-seu-proces-de-primaries-escollir-candidat-o-candidata-eleccions

https://www.catalunyaencomu.cat/ca/premsa/mena-govern-nomes-comptara-amb-nostre-suport-si-descarta-hard-rock-i-situa-com-prioritats

https://www.catalunyaencomu.cat/ca/premsa/mena-laigua-no-cau-del-cel-nomes-quants-i-ja-es-hora-que-govern-consideri-turisme-com-sector

https://www.catalunyaencomu.cat/ca/premsa/mena-hi-ha-molta-ciutadania-tot-pais-que-esta-esperant-fumata-blanca-sobre-investidura-i-es Fliz82 (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Fliz82: Literally all those links show a vermillion-background logo as the header of the website LOL. You are basically acknowledging my own claim that the colours are used interchangeably (which adds to your own initial source –which you have since ommitted– using black, vermillion and purple, then acknowledging vermillion as the main colour and purple as secondary), but then you somehow pretend that we ignore all colours that are not purple. Impru20 (talk) 15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I mean, I am not disputing that purple is used, nor I ever did. That's the whole point: purple is used... as well vermillion, and black/white depending on the circunstamces. Your first source uses vermillion, purple and black versions of the logo. That source also says that, if anything, vermillion is dominant. All sources point to the colours being used interchangeably. These colours are used interchangeably across Wikipedia as well, leading to weird situations when a purple logo is used when the article uses vermillion as the party's colour and vice versa. The use of black here is a compromise (one recognized by the party itself) in which neither one is cherry-picked as the single official colour (since the party uses all of them) that also fits all articles across Wikipedia. I am not even opposing that vermillion and purple versions of the logo may be uploaded separately and used across Wikipedia at leisure. Impru20 (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The corporate colors are vermilion and purple, the first being the main and the lilac the secondary. That is, black is not mentioned, reserved for black and white works. If you don't want to put a purple version you should put it in vermilion, not black. Fliz82 (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

And in the links that I provide from the website you can also see how the purple is used in rollers, lecterns and official folders. Your probably eroticized, sexualized, paraphilized, black color does not appear anywhere on the web. Fliz82 (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Aside of clearly evidencing a lack of genuine care or interest about any arguments other than your own, your reply is absolutely disgusting and out of place. Impru20 (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

You use the LOL before, is only a mirror. Fliz82 (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, it is an outright insult. I did not personally attack you, I used "LOL" as a toned-down way to emphasize that you were pretending to take everyone else as dumb by ignoring that the whole website you kept linking uses other colours (like vermillion everywhere) and by ignoring your own initial source, which you initially kept posting everywhere as an authority source ("hey, that's the party's statutes") until you realized that it showed a black version of the logo similar to the one that has been uploaded. I have attempted to argue with you in a polite way, even pointing an alternative solution (uploading different pics using the various official colours). You have literally thrown accusations at me of things that you have been doing through this discussion, and if I had to tell whether someone here has "eroticized, sexualized, paraphilized" a colour, then that's probably you with your obsession with purple. Anyway, you have let you run out of any meaningful arguments by this point, specially considering your attempt to resort to personal attacks. I hope you have a nice day at the very least. Impru20 (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

It is clear that you have no knowledge about corporate identities or how they always provide a black version, however in those statutes they clearly say that the colors are vermilion and not purple, above black, and I have provided you with numerous sources official where it is used when facing the public, one of those colors and, in no case, black. In fact, this has also been the case in CommonsWikimedia for more than two years until you decided that beyond the corporate image with which the party identifies, what is important are your feelings. Fliz82 (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

You again come with a rant of personal considerations on myself, combined with a random mix of concepts for no reason, only to attempt to hide you lack of arguments. You have blatantly ignored what I have argued for throughout the discussion: the need for a neutral version of the logo that can be used interchangeably for all articles throughout Wikipedia, without that precluding different versions (in purple or vermillion) being uploaded if required. I have never denied the party uses purple. I have never denied the party uses vermillion. It is you have repeteadly cherry-picked sources, arguments and insults to try to defend the case for purple, ignoring that some wikis (such as the Spanish one) use vermillion for the party and not purple. If corporate identities always provide "a black version" then that means, amid the various versions, than that is the most neutral one. That-is-my-point. On the "two year"-thing: this logo is no different than this one that has been around here for seven years, except that it does not include the imagery. That someone in 2021 chose to upload as official a logo that is not the single, official one does not mean than this cannot be corrected. Impru20 (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"then that means, amid the various versions, than that is the most neutral one": Well, you misunderstand, in Spain a lot of printing is done with one ink, that is, only with a black ink cartridge, for example, electoral ballots, and the Ministry of the Interior does not accept any color other than black in its registry of political parties. For this reason, there are political parties that offer a black version, because if the color originals were printed with black ink the result would not be the most optimal. The statutes clearly state which are the two corporate colors, which do not include black, and those are the colors used in its material and in its social networks by the party, which is more authorized for these purposes than you (and me). Fliz82 (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Method

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey Impru20,

Thanks for uploading the local regression for the 2024 Basque election. Could you share the methodology you use? Do you use LOESS? If so, how do you select the span? Could you also share whether you use weights, and, if so, how do you use weights, namely how much weight do you give to the result of the last election?

Thanks and best,

Tomé Tome.rod (talk) 12:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Niceto Alcalá-Zamora (cropped).jpg

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Niceto Alcalá-Zamora (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Modern primat.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic