Pajot - De Wolf
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
edit
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Brusselsepost-rdw01 Maandblad voor Vlamingen te Brussel en elders, Orgaan van het Vlaams Komitee voor Brussel.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Brusselsepost-rdw01 Maandblad voor Vlamingen te Brussel en elders, Orgaan van het Vlaams Komitee voor Brussel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Brusselsepost-rdw01 Maandblad voor Vlamingen te Brussel en elders, Orgaan van het Vlaams Komitee voor Brussel.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
|
File:Bouwkroniek-rdw01 De Bouwkroniek, weekblad voor bouw en industrie.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nostalgie - Beeldhouwwerk van Amaat Hullebroeck.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nostalgie - Beeldhouwwerk van Amaat Hullebroeck.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
- File:Sierlijkheid - Beeldhouwwerk van Amaat Hullebroeck.jpg
- File:Brusselsepost-rdw01 Maandblad voor Vlamingen te Brussel en elders, Orgaan van het Vlaams Komitee voor Brussel.jpg
- File:Dualiteit - Beeldhouwwerk van Amaat Hullebroeck-.jpg
- File:Molen-Beert.jpg
- File:Asbeekrdw1.jpg
- File:A.hullebroeck-dolce-far-niente.rdw.jpg
- File:A.Hullebroeck-leeuwin-rdw.jpg
- File:A.Hullebroeck.torso-rdw.jpg
- File:Ahullebroeckrdw1.jpg
- File:RisoimolenRDW.jpg
- File:Lambiek rdw-o1.jpg
- File:Dewez rdw-01.jpg
- File:DeMont rdw-01.jpg
- File:PayotDW03.jpg
- File:Overlijdingsbericht van F.J. De Gronckel.jpg
- File:Simon1a.png
- File:Simon2a.png
- File:Woning De Gronckel.jpg
- File:PayotDW01.jpg
- File:Payot2DW.jpg
Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:RisoimolenRDW.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RisoimolenRDW.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Copyright status: File:Bouwkroniek-rdw01.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Bouwkroniek-rdw01.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bouwkroniek-rdw01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Ahullebroeckrdw2.jpg
- File:Nostalgie - Beeldhouwwerk van Amaat Hullebroeck.jpg
- File:Sierlijkheid - Beeldhouwwerk van Amaat Hullebroeck.jpg
- File:Brusselsepost-rdw01 Maandblad voor Vlamingen te Brussel en elders, Orgaan van het Vlaams Komitee voor Brussel.jpg
- File:Dualiteit - Beeldhouwwerk van Amaat Hullebroeck-.jpg
- File:Molen-Beert.jpg
- File:Asbeekrdw1.jpg
- File:A.hullebroeck-dolce-far-niente.rdw.jpg
- File:A.Hullebroeck-leeuwin-rdw.jpg
- File:A.Hullebroeck.torso-rdw.jpg
- File:Dewez rdw-01.jpg
- File:DeMont rdw-01.jpg
- File:PayotDW03.jpg
- File:Overlijdingsbericht van F.J. De Gronckel.jpg
- File:Simon1a.png
- File:Simon2a.png
- File:Woning De Gronckel.jpg
- File:PayotDW01.jpg
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:RisoimolenRDW.jpg
editCopyright status: File:RisoimolenRDW.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:RisoimolenRDW.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 14:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Deletion request File:Boon herman bie.jpg
editYou don't seem to be the author of this picture, nor did you provide the evidence that you are entitled to share this picture under the license you gave it, so the file is submitted for deletion. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 17:36, 18 July 2019 (UTC).
File:Furstenberg, Maximilien-v01n01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:College lucht (002).jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:College lucht (002).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:College lucht (002).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content
edit
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello Pajot - De Wolf, I was wondering about the spelling: Het kasteel de Spoelbergh or Het kasteel de Spoelberc as in Kasteel de Spoelberch. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Beste Lotje,
- Bij nazien is het voor mij de Spoelberch en dus niet de Spoelbergh Pajot - De Wolf (talk) 01:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
File:L'Ouragan Rouge, Nicolas Belina-Podgaetsky.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hallo Pajot - De Wolf, omdat je de uploader was :-) kan je definiëren wie wie is? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Beste Lotje,
Vooraf hartelijk dank voor je inzet. De personen zijn van links naar rechts: H. Deligne, J. Baeckens, A. Fonteyne. Feitelijk zou de naam van het bestand moeten zijn: Deligne, Baeckens, Fonteyne. Kan jij dat verhelpen, gezien mijn ouderdom(89) ben ik niet up to date.
Hartelijke groet. 19:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Pajot - De Wolf, omdat je uploader bent: wie is NN ? (v.l.n.r. Frans Du Mong, Luc Lehouck, NN, Hugo Weckx) Thanks Lotje (talk) 12:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Beste Lotje,
- Moest die persoon mij bekend zijn zou ik hem benoemd hebben
- Groet, Pajot - De Wolf (talk) 19:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)