Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2

Contents

File tagging File:VCCyrilRoystonGuytonBassettGrave.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:VCCyrilRoystonGuytonBassettGrave.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kelly (talk) 18:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:VCSamuelFrickletonGrave.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:VCSamuelFrickletonGrave.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kelly (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:VCJohnDanielHintonGrave.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:VCJohnDanielHintonGrave.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kelly (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:VCSamuelMitchellGrave.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:VCSamuelMitchellGrave.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kelly (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:2008_World_Rowing_Masters_Regatta

Renata3 (talk) 06:13, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

File:An Actual Vertical Yellow Bike.jpg

Hallo Schwede66. Ich habe gerade die Diskussion auf Flickr gelesen, die du mit dem Fotografen hattest. Die CC-by-2.0 Lizenz ist natürlich ok, aber auch vorher wäre das Bild schon akzeptabel gewesen. Du schreibst dort, dass "public domain" bei Commons nicht erlaubt sei, aber das ist so nicht richtig. Was wir nicht akzeptieren ist die "Public Domain Mark 1.0"   (PDM). Aber laut den Metadaten der Bilddatei hatte cogdog das Foto vorher unter   "Public domain" im Sinne von Creative Commons Zero 1.0 veröffentlicht, was total in Ordnung ist. Bei den beiden muss man höllisch aufpassen, denn das eine (PDM) ist lediglich eine Angabe, dass das Bild gemeinfrei ist – warum, wird aber meist nicht angegeben und lässt sich nicht nachprüfen. CC Zero dagegen ist eine bewusste Verzichtserklärung durch den Urheber und damit auch auf Commons gültig. Wie dem auch sei, ich habe das Bild jetzt mit CC-by-2.0 geprüft. De728631 (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

De728631 Gut, danke. Ich benutze das Flickr Upload Tool und das akzeptiert diese Lizenz nicht. Hat such aber geregelt. Schwede66 16:49, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Current_members_of_the_New_Zealand_House_of_Representatives

Rhadamante (talk) 20:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Christchurch Graffiti New Zealand.jpg

 
File:Christchurch Graffiti New Zealand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B dash (talk) 08:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Possible copyright issue

Hi Schwede66, I see you've uploaded some NIWA images a while ago. It appears the NIWA licence has changed on their website. Do you think they should be deleted now? E.g. these files - see original file here. Licence on the NIWA website is CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, not the more permissive licence noted on the file pages. Cheers Ballofstring (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ballofstring: For Commons, what matters is how a file is licensed at the time of upload. If they change their mind on licensing later on that’s their problem. Schwede66 18:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
@Schwede66: Okay, great thanks! They are really great images so it would be a shame to lose them... glad we get to keep them :-) Ballofstring (talk) 23:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Pencarrow

I have converted Category:Pencarrow and Category:Pencarrow Head into DAB pages. Although they aren't DABs on WP, the threshold for being primary here is higher. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Extinction Rebellion - Climate Action Now - 30985632567.jpg

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Extinction Rebellion - Climate Action Now - 30985632567.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: Having just had another read of de minimis you are probably correct. Schwede66 17:53, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
It's always tricky - there are a few that are "probably" OK - I left File:Frack off, Extinction Rebellion (cropped).jpg - maybe just too simple, but as it's here in the UK, the COM:TOO is also extremely low, so it does not take much effort to gain copyright when making a banner/placard.

Copyright status: File:185 empty white chairs- remembering Christchurch earthquake.jpg

Copyright status: File:185 empty white chairs- remembering Christchurch earthquake.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:185 empty white chairs- remembering Christchurch earthquake.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

I've contacted the photographer via Flickr Mail to please choose a compatible license. Schwede66 02:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:OBike in Melbourne 26556512809.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:OBike in Melbourne 26556512809.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

User:Ronhjones I've sorted this one. Schwede66 02:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, added review passed. Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:OBike in Melbourne 26743241019.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:OBike in Melbourne 26743241019.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Schwede66,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Cabbage tree at Burnside

Thanks for the clarification on that! It would be useful if that could be added to the photo descriptions please, to help avoid errors like mine. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for helping out with the sorting and categorising of the mosque shooting photos. We have lots of new users uploading images, and it's great you're assisting them. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Pleasure. Thank you for working social media to get people onto Wikimedia. Schwede66 20:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--B dash (talk) 00:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@B dash: I don't download Flickr images to my computer first. Under my user rights, I get the option of uploading directly from Flickr via the Upload wizard, and all I have to do is to provide the Flickr URL. I would have thought that the system is clever enough to find its way to the full-res version as any down-sized version relates back to the full-size version via given URL rules on Flickr. Is that not so? Would you be able to provide an example where I've uploaded a photo from Flickr that isn't the full version? Also, I've never used auto-categorisation as I don't believe in that; I'd rather stay in full control of that aspect. Schwede66 00:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
@B dash: Could you please give me the courtesy of answering (at least some of) my questions? Schwede66 09:50, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Schwede66/Archive 2".