Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Shizhao/2009

< User talk:Shizhao
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Betoseha in topic 关于文件的删除

存档

edit

Don't randomly delete my image files. They my own work. Thanks! (File:Tank Game Screenshot 1~5.png)

==Hi there! First, sorry if im doing something wrong. Im not a wikipedia expert, only try to make some articles better. As a brazillian stand up comedian and tv writer I try to guard for the articles in the subject. I was not the one who firts putted my pictures on the articles, but, once they are there, Im trying to make still there... and right! I see im making some mistakes. I would love to have some help to provide the accurate license on the pictures, since IM the author AND main person on both!!! If you prefer (I do) we coult talk trough my email: brunomotta@gmail.com I really do aprecciate your help. :)

File:General braz.jpg, Question

edit

WHy did u delete the picture of Wladyslaw Turowicz if it has a reference source? Here is the Link: http://www.pakistaniaviationforum.com/index.php?showtopic=1464 The Picture is taken by Pakistan Air Force Officials. I disagree of what u done.


 
Hello, Shizhao. You have new messages at Fleshgrinder's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Leifeng(4).jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The picuture was taken 50 years ago, the COPYRIGHT has expired. Please notice the

 
This image is now in the public domain in China because its term of copyright has expired.

According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China (with legal jurisdiction in the mainland only, excluding Hong Kong and Macao), amended November 11, 2020, Works of legal persons or organizations without legal personality, or service works, or audiovisual works, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation. For photography works of natural persons whose copyright protection period expires before June 1, 2021 belong to the public domain. All other works of natural persons enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.
According to copyright laws of Republic of China (currently with jurisdiction in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, etc.), all photographs and cinematographic works, and all works whose copyright holder is a juristic person, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation, and all other applicable works enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.

Important note: Works of foreign (non-U.S.) origin must be out of copyright or freely licensed in both their home country and the United States in order to be accepted on Commons. Works of Chinese origin that have entered the public domain in the U.S. due to certain circumstances (such as publication in noncompliance with U.S. copyright formalities) may have had their U.S. copyright restored under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) if the work was under copyright in its country of origin on the date that the URAA took effect in that country. (For the People's Republic of China, the URAA took effect on January 1, 1996. For the Republic of China (ROC), the URAA took effect on January 1, 2002.[1])
To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it or held its copyright.

 You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that this work might not be in the public domain in countries that do not apply the rule of the shorter term and have copyright terms longer than life of the author plus 50 years. In particular, Mexico is 100 years, Jamaica is 95 years, Colombia is 80 years, Guatemala and Samoa are 75 years, Switzerland and the United States are 70 years, and Venezuela is 60 years.

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ português ∙ română ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

 

 

notice!!!!!! User:Amphylite 13:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Pullman strike guard harpers.jpg: "no source" removed

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi there, I disagree on this. The source link points to a "401 not found", to me it is not a good source info. We have the name of the newspaper, I'd like at least a date of publication, if we can't have more... What do you think? --Eusebius (talk) 09:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bah, I couldn't find a better source. I found several references of this picture, but all of them come from Commons. I have read in books that Harper's Weekly covered this strike in 1894; I don't know for sure that the illustration was in it (it's not the same look as the others I could find), but I'll just trust the uploader and remove the problem tag. Sorry! --Eusebius (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Angkor Head2.jpg:

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Admin Shizhao,

  • This image should not have been subjected to a new flickr review because it is a Flickr Lickr image. Flickr Lickr images were licensed freely when first placed on Commons They are non-revocable. Flickr Lickr only accepted images that were licensed freely. So, this image was licensed as "cc by 2.0" in April 2007 when first uploaded to Commons. Please also see this comment from Admin Lupo: [2] and this edit by him. I have made the changes to this Angkor image. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Another speedy stamp

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I noticed you deleted File:1970-Ag8DiadelaArmada-GoletaJuliet1814.jpg as a speedy per my nomination. You might also want to review this stamp File:Martín Garcia-Estampilla.jpg nominated at the same time for the same reason. TIA Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good evening. Regarding the file File:1970-Ag8DiadelaArmada-GoletaJuliet1814.jpg: Even if it strives for a stamp is for public use, the stamp is verified to be 1970 and first published in Argentina for over 25 years (Law 11723) public domain. The picture is around 1950 and its author died in 1977. Why should be eliminated?
As File:Martín Garcia-Estampilla.jpg the author of the painting is the same as the reproduction should not give problems.
Sorry for my bad English. Greetings, Quijav (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
BTW, the talk page File talk:Martín Garcia-Estampilla.jpg for the deleted file still exists. Thanks
10 days later and this talk page still exists, can you possible delete it like you did with the main file. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
  Done --Eusebius (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Behemoth2.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Behemoth2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Behemoth2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ChristianBier (talk) 01:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token ee6e7440934f0f53a697c41e9cbf2840

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token a66d5629f2e29dc376e85304ff4ead2a

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token e474886a3f95bc77e68860b64a7003a1

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Bogus no source notice

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What is the meaning of this? The page clearly states the source of the image. It states that the image was taken by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and sent to me in an email by Mike Brown, the discoverer of the planet. Mike Brown is an easy person to contact if you need to verify this. He maintains a blog and his email address is publicly listed on the web. Please don't post any more bogus deletion notices on people's images. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 04:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


request for deletion of File:That luang1.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The picture is published under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 License. In short: you are free to share and make derivative works of the file under the conditions that you appropriately attribute it, and that you distribute it only under a license identical to this one. There is no need for an agreement of the author, you just have to name him. So what's the problem?--Spolloman (talk) 07:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago60 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Shizhao!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Source?

edit

File:Chuck Yeager with GlamorousGlennis.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Chuck Yeager with GlamorousGlennis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Infrogmation (talk) 02:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

LJDickinson.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, you deleted File:LJDickinson.jpg for what looks like a very valid reason (lack of real source); however I looked further on behalf of an undeletion request and found the actual source on the Library of Congress; the image was taken (apparently as part of photographing all new Congressmen) in 1921/2 and is therefore PD-US, and furthermore the original negative was later donated to the Library of Congress anyways so it is PD on both counts. If you agree, could you look at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#LJ_Dickinson_photo_came_from_the_USGovernment and undelete it? Thanks :-) Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ah OK, this was done by another admin. Never mind :-) Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, if you make transfers from Flickr please give images categories, descriptions and please delete duplicate uploads, duplicates because we already had this images on Commons or duplicate because you decided to upload the image again under a better name. --Martin H. (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:French-vowels.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:French-vowels.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Moxfyre (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Sickert.jpg and File:Roman bath at bath england 1.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you please add why this picture is PD? Is ist PD-old or something else? --Jodo (talk) 12:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deleted images

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hello Shizhao, could you please make use of the Commons Delinker, when you think it's necessary to delete images? It's quite ugly to find red links in many of my articles. And could you please, as well, restore File:NC-Congress-MarionButler.jpg? This is a picture with "No known restrictions on publication" as you can see here in the Library of Congress entry. I would put the license into the file afterwards. Thank you, --Scooter (talk) 12:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot for restoring. As I was told meanwhile, the Commons Delinker should work automatically, what it obviously did not in the case of the pictures you deleted. This leads to ugly red links in the articles, but this is of course not your fault. I put the license into the file description. Could you be so kind and restore File:Frank Bartlett Willis.jpg as well? There is also a proper license to be found in the Library of Congress. Greetings, --Scooter (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hello Shizhao, you did restore the image, but it cannot be displayed yet. It doesn't show up in the galleries, although I was able to add the license. Could you please take a look on that? --Scooter (talk) 21:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interactive Scientific Visualization Techniques.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. could you take a look at the question I have added at the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Interactive Scientific Visualization Techniques.jpg. Thank you. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:胡风 书籍批判.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I can't read the language, but do you really thing that what is displayed on the cover (a title, mainly?) can be protected by copyright? --Eusebius (talk) 11:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:HaloVisualizationTechnique.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:HaloVisualizationTechnique.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

85.179.162.138 06:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please clean up the mess

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

You transfered a couple of images, but you can't leave them like this. Please correct them. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 19:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

You seem to have uploaded a lot of images from zh wikipedia. In the process the source info (for example author) got lost. Without the source info these files will get nominated for deletion sooner or later. To get Commonshelper to function properly you should first replace {{Information}} at zh wikipedia with the English version. This way Commonshelper will function properly and you'll end up with good transfers to here. Multichill (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Would you be so kind to respond? You're recent uploads like this one still don't look ok. You're spending a lot of time to transfer images here, don't you want to do it right? Multichill (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
hi, asian characters break altogether in CommonsHelper--shizhao (talk) 13:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
I just uploaded File:KMBRoute64K.jpg. The information template broke, but the Asian characters seem to be ok, right? Multichill (talk) 14:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
No, information template and text all break--shizhao (talk) 14:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Did you take a look at File:KMBRoute64K.jpg? Multichill (talk) 14:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Canadalogo.svg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, I noticed you deleted this file as replaceable fair use, but I don't really see what could replace it (you didn't mention it) and there was a DR going on about it. I really wish we could have discussed it more before it got deleted. Could you please restore it? Thank you. --Tryphon (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, I restored it myself and reopened the DR. I just wanted to let you know, I thought you'd like to participate in it. --Tryphon (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

kanji on image

edit

could you please give me Tsaitgaist (talk) the kanji written on the image Image28swardjp.jpg so I can complete it's vectorisation. thanks

Portraits of PRC politicians with PD-PRC-exempt

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Commons:Deletion requests/Portraits of PRC politicians with PD-PRC-exempt, your help is appreciated. --Martin H. (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please delete File:Shuangshi_logo.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm very sorry that I don't familiar with the fair use rationale when I'm working with that. Please delete the image on the wikimedia asap and it would be very grateful if you could also notify me at Chinese version of wikipedia [3] when you deleted this image so I could upload it to wikipedia using correct fair-use permission. Thank you very much. - Xmhaoyu (talk) 04:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Guangzhou-underground-wholesale-centre-0607.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

I got a message from you regarding this photo, saying "This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license". I wonder what the matter with this photo is. I took the photo and posted it with the usual CFDL/CC license, along with dozens of other pictures from Guangzhou, posted in exactly the same way. File history would show that. Whom else would I need to ask permission from?

Is this just a bot error of some kind, or is there a real issue with something like "derivative work" and the implication is that for this image to exist on Commons one needs the agreement of however owns copyright in the various items of the shopping center's "decor" seen in the image - such as the direction signs, various "welcome to our mall" signs, and perhaps even the fire alarm sign? In my humble view, those seem to be fairly utilitarian signs, and not exactly works of art - otherwise, noone could ever post a picture of the insides of a shopping mall or a train stations, because they are always full of signs etc... Vmenkov (talk) 13:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

为什么删除中山医科大学校徽？

edit

帅哥，图样是我自己制作的啵，哪里触犯了版权条例，请赐教！

File:2 Type 094 submarines.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. You tagged this file as "no permission", but this image was transferred from en.wiki with the same name, so any en.wiki admin can prove that en:User:Otherjoke uploaded it and tagged it as public domain. Do you really need special permission for that image or it will be enough to tag image with some kind of template telling smth like "moved from en.wiki, was there"? --217.118.66.68 20:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removal of "No source"

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Excuse me, but what where you doing here: [4], [5]? The images have neither source nor author nor description, only a licence-tag which is not enough to use it as interpretation for a source. -- Cecil (talk) 14:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please add a reason

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, without a given reason of deleting this pic in Commons:Deletion requests/File:George Sanders-Debra Paget-Movie Still.jpg it's a bit weird to start an undeletion request. See also: User_talk:Clindberg#Published.2Fnot_published. Mutter Erde 92.226.193.200 10:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:WikiProject BBC logo.svg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to the Google cache at [6], this image had an appropriate license tag and a link to the source image. Stannered (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Heads up

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I know that en.wiki is not your "home wiki", and I doubt you were notified anywhere, but there was a complaint about you (and a call for "impeachment") at w:en:Administrators' noticeboard. I closed the discussion and directed the user here, because he was squawking about deletions that you performed here, but I thought you ought to receive a notification. The link is w:en:http://Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Request to impeach the Administrator User:Shizhao. Cheers. Horologium (talk) 00:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:7 eleven.jpg and "assumed own work"

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I thought that on Commons, unless on en:WP, we needed an explicit statement from the uploader to accept "own work", and that we didn't rely on the automatic phrasing of licensing templates. Is there a specific guidelines for imported files, or did I miss something? --Eusebius (talk) 19:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Pinheiros2.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Shizhao, I think the file Special:Undelete/File:Pinheiros2.jpg should be restored, the info on pt.wiki was good [7], pt:Especial:Restaurar/Ficheiro:Pinheiros2.jpg, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 13:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:VMA2008_-_Red_Carpet_-_CA.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, you deleted the image, can you decide Commons:Deletion requests/File:VMA2008 - Red Carpet - CA.jpg? Thanks, --Martin H. (talk) 15:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deleted image: File:Prophase.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Shizhao,

I don't know who uploaded File:Prophase.jpg, but since I was using it, I noticed when it disappeared. I went searching for a suitable replacement and stumbled across File:Gray2.png. I am almost certain that the deleted image was probably cropped from this one. If so, perhaps it could be restored? Thanks for looking into this. --Jomegat (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Saw this and restored it, thanks for finding the source. --Martin H. (talk) 17:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Woohoo! Thanks for the restore! --Jomegat (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deleted image : torrepunica

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hi

You deleted this image from Wp:IT ([8]) I put on commons. If you had looked after original license, you would not have delete it. Pradigue (talk) 16:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of File:RobertKoch.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, i see you're marking a lot of images as no source, but among these images are images which have a source like File:RobertKoch.jpg. If you don't like the missing of the deeplink just add it. The image is easy to find with google images. Just tagging these heavy usage images is rather destructive behaviour. Multichill (talk) 16:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of Image:Iberia Lgo.jpg

edit

This file has permission from the owner, to be displayed. I have sent it to OTRS (permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org) in the day that was marked to be deleted. I do not understand why it was deleted. I would appreciate if you undeleted the image please. Thank you.

 
Zorglub

19:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:China_tea.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:China_tea.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Yasser-arafat-1999.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, could you please take a look at this undeletion request for an image that was deleted by you after it had been tagged as {{Copyvio}}? Thanks and kind regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deletion

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When you deleted File:Kaaba1_small.gif, you could have added information that it was almost synonymous with the image File:Kaaba.png. V85 (talk) 16:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delection

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

You was delected the image File:FIFA_99_logo.jpg. Why? Don't was a copyright violation, was a simple textlogo. Pirelo (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for restaured the image. Pirelo (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Waldrapp

edit

My picture File:Graz Schlossberg Waldrapp Infotafel.jpg (see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graz_Schlossberg_Waldrapp_Infotafel.jpg)

has been marked for deletion, because of "missing permissions".


In fact, a permission for this picture is NOT necessary. It has been taken in Austria and shows an object, which is permanently installed in an public space. Because of the Austrian law it is allowed to fotograph this object without any permission, and also it is allowed to publish pictures of the object without permission (this is called "Panoramafreiheit", freedom of panorama, see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panoramafreiheit#.C3.96sterreich, in German).

Therefore the picture does not need any permission and there is no reason to delete the picture.


best regards.

user: Mediocrity

File:Arc system works logo.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This file is enelegible for copyright because it only consists of one color, simple typeface letters and a simpre distorced line.I think you didn't even care to see the image's description and the licenses tags. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 13:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you please remove the dummy-header when adding something to the CommonsDelinker-commands (before saving). And there is something called "Copy & Paste", you really don't need to make an own edit for each of the replacement-commands. The edit-window is large enough to copy several statements in one edit before saving. The CommonsDelinker will be very much grateful to you if it does not need to start several times and gets them all in one. Also the other users will be glad if the CommonsDelinker will not stop working. -- Cecil (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of Coat_of_arms_of_Liberia.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, I don't think it's a good idea to delete a file that is used on I don't know how many projects on quite a few pages - no matter what may have been wrong with the file. Anyways, shouldn't it be delinked by Commonsdelinker or who is responsible for that? Regards, --X-Weinzar (talk) 23:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

author mistake

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hye, I made a mistake about the author here and here on my last changes: I am the author of these images which are free screenshots. I changed the mentions of author, so I think there's no more problem: so can you erase your mentions "This file is missing permission, etc" on theses pages ? Thanks. --Zozozazou (talk) 23:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

About Logo TRI.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. It's about File:Logo RTI.png, I make a mistake : in the originel version it's specified that I can't transfer it on Commons, but I forgot (I made it for the french Graphic Lab) . So I think you can suppress it. Good Weekend ! -- Walké (talk) 08:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:GuillaumeDeVillaret.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! I remember I did upload such file, but I don't remember exactly how I found it, so I'm afraid it would have to be deleted. Robert Kowalczyk (talk) 22:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm new here you see. Can you please tell me about Wikimedia? I also work in the Turkish Wikipedia, so it will be easy for me. --Maniaqq (talk) 18:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Jan_Krenz_Polish_composer.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This image was taken and published in Poland before 1994, according to Polish law. Check

 
This photograph is in the public domain because according to the Art. 3 of copyright law of March 29, 1926 of the Republic of Poland and Art. 2 of copyright law of July 10, 1952 of the People's Republic of Poland, all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed to be in the public domain in Poland.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it meets three requirements:

  1. it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days),
  2. it was first published before 1 March 1989 without copyright notice or before 1964 without copyright renewal or before the source country established copyright relations with the United States,
  3. it was in the public domain in its home country (Poland) on the URAA date (1 January 1996).
To uploader: Please provide where and when the image was first published.
 

regulations. Photographs taken and published before 1994 can be used freely. Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 07:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hackney Turbine.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, I was trying to add it with {{PD-UK}}, which worked on English Wikipedia. Do you know of a Commons equivalent? Pterre (talk) 08:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks very much! Pterre (talk) 08:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Berlin-Steglitz Gutshaus Steglitz Tafel.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This file is free by the German law of freedom of panorama. Please remove the deletion request. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 08:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

How do I stop the deletion process? I have the permission!

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

For http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fo_wiki_logo.jpg see http://www.freeorion.org/index.php/FreeOrionWiki:Copyrights. Thank you! Peer-LAN (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Clamp at Anime Expo 2006.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As the image description page says, I have e-mailed a copy of the permission to OTRS, and the image is tagged with {{OTRS pending}}. Such images should not be tagged with {{No permission}}, so I have removed the tag. Sometimes it takes OTRS volunteers longer than a week to respond. All the best, Quadell (talk) 13:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

file:Lars_Sponheim_1.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why did you tag this image as a copyvio? It the official flickraccount of the Norwegian political party of which Lars Sponheim is the leader. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


CORE keygen screenshot.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. Please, explain me why this file has a problem. I used screenshot of this keygen-program for the russian article "keygen". I think there's a problem to get permission from CORE-team. Can I use this file without any restrictions? FlankerFF (talk) 16:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Aernout Smit Table Bay, 1683 William Fehr Collection Cape Town.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Dear Shizhao, This image is PD because of it's age. Therefore it doesn't matter if it can be found anywhere else on the web. So if you don't mind I'll remove the template:Similarimage. By the way, the english in this template is difficult to understand. You might want to fix it, or have somebody fix it for you. Thank you. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 15:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

ok, maybe this helps:
"A bot has found one or more identical images of this file through the Copyright Checker, which could indicate a copyright violation."
After this I'm not sure what you mean by "but detail information removed", etc. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Images de L'ultime Chimère

edit

Bonjour, Vous avez supprimé l'image de la couverture. je vous ai pourtant envoyé aujourd'hui même un mail prouvant le droit de l'auteur, "copyrighté" par Glénat. Je ne comprends plus rien... Cordialement. CuriousReader (d) 26 avril 2009 à 11:10 (CEST)

Your messages

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This one was moved from English Wikipedia - which should have been obvious. It's tagged as US govt image.

Perhaps in future you could actually bother to read the information the bot moves, or suggest to the bot's creators that it doesn't move images that are likely to be contested?

Flagged for deletion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 26 April 2009 (UTC) OK , Not in a good mood when I wrote that - Apologies Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:ElCoP_logo.svg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am a member of these group (ElCoP). So, it's our logo! Please, do not delete this file. Is this OK? JustusD (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Škoda 17Tr.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Remove that nonsense, it is obviously photo that I made. --Dezidor (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:MediaMagikLogo.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I reverted the no permission tag you added to this as there is an OTRS template on it. Stifle (talk) 08:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Vmanstein.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Vmanstein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 15:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Cplp.gif

edit

Have you an Idea of the kind of headache you have caused when delete this image? You know how many boxes were ruined? how can be erased if the majority did not agree?

 
Zorglub

17:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Erm, hi...

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seemed like you were assuming bad faith on my talkpage. I don't really know an awful lot about copyright, and would appreciate help, not anger. Excuse me if I've got this wrong. Look, this image wasn't mine, I simply erased the whitespace. I feel that you'd be best off talking to him. Malpass93 (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, could you be more careful please. You've given me two messages about images which were in fact in perfectly good order. The latest one is public domain art because it was crated in 1917. File_talk:N.C._Wyeth_-_The_Passing_of_Robin_Hood.jpg Thanks. - Thomas Gun (talk) 21:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

По-русски понимаешь или как?

edit

Зачем ты указал, что понимаешь по-русски и админишь русских пользователей, когда ты ноль в этом деле? за что ты удаляешь файлы мои? объясни мне, пожалуйста!

Warning about image replacement

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao. I noticed your recent universal replacement of File:George-Washington.jpg by File:Gilbert Stuart Williamstown Portrait of George Washington.jpg. Although I agree with the spirit of this replacement, I wanted to note a couple things:

  • The original file being replaced is a cropped detail of the full portrait. These are more appropriate for small images, such as in tables and lists. It's not a good idea to replace a cropped detail with a full image - instead, upload a cropped detail from the full image and replace it with that instead.
  • Additionally, you described it as an "exact or scaled-down duplicate" - this could be misleading in this case, as not only is it a different crop, but it's also significantly different in sharpness, color, and so on. You can delete it as an inferior copy, but generally we avoid doing that for paintings because it might actually be a photo of a different copy of the painting by a different artist.

Thanks for understanding. :-) Dcoetzee (talk) 02:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:O_Mosquito_5S_N10.jpg

edit

By Portuguese law, any dissolved or defunct magazine and newspaper, enters in public domain. So this is the correct license for the file and there are no reason to delete him.

Pela lei portuguesa, qualquer revista, ou jornal, extinta, entra no domínio publico. Como tal é esta a licença correcta e o ficheiro não tem razão de ser apagado.

 
Zorglub

05:46, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Elzeviriano_Ibarra_font.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Sent message to permissions-commons by the author of the PDF in which this image is included. Waiting for resolution. Franzrogar (talk) 15:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC) (Added sign, forgot to add it)Reply

I repeat, I've the permission. Could you quit the removal-warning in my image? It took you only 3 mins after I upload the image to put the warning. And it's passed 1 day after I sent the permission and it's still there. Franzrogar (talk) 09:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've received confirmation from permissions-commons. Writting again to owner. Franzrogar (talk) 09:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

RE:File:T-38.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I've left a response on my talk page to the template you left there. The gist: "I'm not disputing the proposed deletion of the image, just a bit upset about being templated like a vandal". So I left a response there. I'm over it, but I wanted to make sure you were aware I wrote something in response. Jhf (talk) 10:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I do not have a source for the image. It should be deleted. Thank you. Jhf (talk) 13:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nature007 post

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear 'Shizhao', I have just recently received a notification that you reported my pictures of the logo of the Brazilian political parties: File:Prpparrepprop.jpg AND File:Partsoccrist.jpg. Firstly I would like to affirm that these pictures were snapshots taken by me on the internet band then fixed with paint and Photoshop CS3, making me not having broken anything in basis with copyright terms. Secondly I would like to explain to you the reason I did all this work. The concrete reason I did this is therefore the children or human being who go on Wikipedia would not be blinded by not seeing the political party logo. If people go on Wikipedia they will like to see or read a little bit more on the party they're looking at and wouldn't you like to know you helped humankind?

In conclusion, if you understand the sentimental value I have towards my work for Wikipedia and all the people that use it, please, in all that is valuable, remove the copyright.

Sincerely,

Your Friend,

Nature 007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nature007 (talk • contribs)

I handled the issue. Most of his uploads are not respecting copyright laws... :o
One of the file can be kept under text logo still.
Esby (talk) 18:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:O Mosquito 5S N10.jpg

edit

Isto já é provocação. Ouve lá já estas a abusar és surdo ou que?????? Está imagem está no dominio publico porque é que insistes??????

This sounds like a provocation. Look there, now you are abusing, are you deaf or what ?????? This image is in the public domain why do you insist in delete them??????

 
Zorglub

18:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

The case of the File:O_Mosquito_5S_N10.jpg

edit

The Portugal law says that a dissolved magazine and newspaper, enters in public domain after 3 years it's dissolution and in case of defunct is one year. But I have made a mistake and please I am sorry for that. I didn't read completely the law, the article 173 of the authors protections, says that the author retains the author rights. resuming, the name and the structure of the magazine is public domain but the cover, if contains protected material, isn't. and is this the case, for that again I'm sorry for my behavior.

 
Zorglub

04:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)




hello

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Sorry, the insignia of the 153rd Infantry Regiment fortress, I am a former soldier, I am collector of military insignia.   kindly Fantassin 72 (talk) 11:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I do not agree with the deletion of this military badge because I scanned it . I collect militaria and I am a former military man. Thanks for taking my request into consideration.Fantassin 72 (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have a lot of badges that I exchange between collectors sorry that the badge itself and a version of another document.Fantassin 72 (talk) 13:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cardiganbay.jpeg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is the copy of a postage stamp. You can delete it. I really don't know how to get permission. This is too complicated. Wallie (talk) 12:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Shizhao,

Thankyou for your remark. I am new here and any advice will be welcome. I have added the missing information.

Kind regards,

Marbotarchives

RE:Rockstar London

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Commented on the discussion page. Melancolicsphere (talk) 13:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Alto orinoco5.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, I like your tool and the use of TinEye, I also use TinEye for a long time already and it saves me much time in finding possible copyright violations. There is one danger: It is possible, that other reuse content from Wikipedia. In this case Im unsure, if the first uploader is realy the author, but the TinEye is not the correct proof, that he is not. Saving images from Commons the wrong way results in imagenames like 800px-Filename.jpg. This is a case here, the image is taken from Wikipedia according to the filename, a 200px thumbnail from an article was saved and reused - moreover the site is not available but according to the pagename it seems to be a mirror of Wikipedia. Please pay more attention to this circular references. --Martin H. (talk) 13:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

A suggestion would be to exclude two kind of images from TinEye check: Images reuploaded 1 month after first upload and images uploaded with It is a derivative work of a file from Commons through Commons:Upload (derivativeFX). Is this possible or what do you think? --Martin H. (talk) 13:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

CPLP

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How could you delete that file without discussing it first? The symbol was not exactly the same logo and, moreover, CPLP asked me to use that animation in their site. There were three users against it, and you simply vanished with the animation. What a wrong attitude for an administrator! --Tonyjeff (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, same thing happened to the Rockstar London logo. I think the discussion page should just be deleted, since no administrator around here uses before going ahead and deleting the files. It's a completely arbitrary thing. Melancolicsphere (talk) 19:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Problem with french wikipedia

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Why I can't transfert pics to Wikipedia french please? One exemple is File:Rustamid Dynasty 776 - 909 (AD).PNG [9] or this File:Almoravid Dynasty 1073 - 1147 (AD).PNG. Those files are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5, Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 and Attribution ShareAlike 1.0 i think. I have many exemples. Thank u --Great11 (talk) 04:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image replacement

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. You proposed an image to be replaced here but the source image seems superior to the destination image, don't you think? I was going to reverse the move and bring the other image to COM:DEL. What do you think? Wknight94 talk 15:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Une_noce_chez_le_photographe.jpg

edit

merci d'en expliquer la raison et pourquoi pas File:Dagnan-Bouveret Marguerite au Sabbat.jpg ? [[::fr::Utilisateur:Pramzan|Pramzan]] 7 mai 2009

File:Atcroutes-1sep1945.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

All you have to do is LOOK AT THE MAP and it STATES CLEARLY "UNITED STATES ARMY AIR FORCE".. which is the source for the map.

That is what I put on the tags when I uploaded it. I fail to understand why you tagged it "unsourced" Bwmoll3 (talk) 20:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

logo Art Absolument

edit

L'image du logo Art Absolument est la propriété de la revue Art Absolument; elle a été réalisé par la graphiste Nicolas Blanchet qui nous donne tous les droits nécessaire afin de pouvoir diffuser cette image sur le site wikipedia. Merci de me dire quel est le problème et pourquoi vous la marquez comme copyright violation cordialement

File:Wallago attu 046.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have removed the speedy delete from image Wallago attu 046.JPG because the image at O=Fish is the copy and the one here is the original. The post dates show the imatge here to have been posed in April 2006 while te O-fish image was posted in April 2008.--Kevmin (talk) 07:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Thank you for having deleted the duplicate File:A 31 bridge across DEK.jpg I have another one: File:Ruine_Wielandstein_(2007).jpg :-) Thank you in advance! --Iotatau (talk) 14:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Solved - another admin deleted the second one. Thanks again. --Iotatau (talk) 06:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Brazil map deletion

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I modified File:Brazil pol94.jpg as it was stated that it was in the public domain. I only highlighted five of the states which had been affected by the current flooding. Public domain mean it is in the public domain to re-use. Would you please re-instate the file File:2009BrazilFlood.png which was deleted as I did pay attention to copyright or explain what part of public domain I don't understand.SriMesh | talk 02:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Groupe esc troyes.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, you've flagged this logo as a copyvio, but I took the liberty to tag it as PD-textlogo instead, I think it is simple enough. If you don't agree, I suggest you begin a regular deletion request, but you'll admit that we've kept more complex logos. --Eusebius (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

請說明你認為此圖是copyvio的理由。--

百楽兎

01:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

請於「今日」之內回覆。--
百楽兎
 00:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Cplp.gif

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, you closed the DR for this file with delete. Today, a undeletion request was filed here where the image was immediately restored without any discussion by another admin. I've already commented this case and you might want to add your comment as well. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requesting your help

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi. By mistake I created Flexible-fuel vehicles in the United States when actually I was trying to create the new sub-category Category:Flexible-fuel vehicles in the United States. Would you please delete the former entry. Thanks and sorry for my mistake.--Mariordo (talk) 23:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:GEC4080FrontPanel.gif

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You marked this image I uploaded as copyvio. The copy found on the internet is also by me. I licensed this image under the "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported" License when I uploaded it. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do now, but I removed the copyvio and put this explanation on the page. If there's something else I'm supposed to do, please tell me. Sadg4000 (talk) 13:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

request on File:A typical American bathroom.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Ni hao Shizhao,

you informed me about missing permissions [10]. I dont know what to do. I am not the first uploader of this file, I have not taken the picture. I downloaded the original picture from commons, then I improved its quality and loaded back as a new version. I grant all permissions and keep the licenses of the orginal file. The license allows me to alter the work under some conditions, which I observed. I send an Email regarding this to OTR. Is there anything else to do? Best regards, --Barfuß in Rom (talk) 05:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please take a look at this notice on the uploader's talk page. Barfuß in Rom, this does not concern you and you do not need to send a permission to OTRS regarding this image. The notification was apparently misplaced on your talk page. I've meanwhile notified the original uploader. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
OK, thanks for the quick answer. --Barfuß in Rom (talk) 19:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Shizhao, I've meanwhile removed the {{No permission}} notice from this image as I've found the license information of the copyright holder on archive.org that confirms the given CC-BY-SA license. Please check the updated image description. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 17:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deleting National Eurovision logo ?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Shizhao.

I would like to know why my picture about the Croatian Eurovision logo have to be deleted ? I've alredy ask if I'd can put my pictures on Wikimedia Commons to change flags to national picture for Eurovision. Moreover, the "Eurovision Song Contest" logo is from Wikipedia and all flags too. So I don't know why my picture have to be deleated ? Can you answer me for more presitions. Thanks Facy5 (talk) 07:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

[File:Atcroutes-1sep1945.jpg]]

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If you look in the image, it clearly says "UNITED STATES ARMY AIR FORCES", which is the source.....

And what I posted when i uploaded the image.

I'm removing your deletion tag from that image Bwmoll3 (talk) 23:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Chinese translations needed

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Jastrow and I are working on autotranslating {{Meta information museum}}, the meta-template we use for many museums, like {{Information北京石刻艺术博物馆}}. Could you please help us find Chinese translations for every tag name: 

   * artist/maker
   * description
   * dimensions
   * credit line
   * accession number
   * location
   * source/photographer
   * references
   * other versions

"Credit line" is mainly about the mode of acquisition: what collection does it come from? Did it join the collections by gift, purchase, on loan, etc.?

Thanks in advance. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 12:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Icone_SF.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Icone_SF.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Sedgwick County Courthouse, Julesburg.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for checking this; I'm always uploading PD-USGov images, but this is the first time that anything has tagged it in this way. Nyttend (talk) 01:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Hu Feng in 1950.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, you transferred this image from zh-wp to Commons. I understand from the included copy of the log at zh-wp that this image was initially uploaded under something like a fair use rationale. You changed this at Commons to {{PD-cn}} but without giving any indication when these two images were published. Do you know anything about an early publication, i.e. within the 50ies, of these images such that PD-cn indeed applies? The arrest warrant on the right hand side is surely {{PD-ineligible}} but the photograph? How is "Released under the GNU Free Documentation License." in the permission field to be understood? For the scan which is not eligible for copyright? Thanks for your help and regards, AFBorchert (talk) 20:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Gplv3-127x51.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Gplv3-127x51.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


The Bob Woolmer picture. You had no right to delete this pic! I took it myself and it is my copyright if it is anybodys. I released it into the public domain. Please restore it. Paddy Briggs 29/5

File:Ares I-X USS.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a government image which is open to the public for anyone to use. I overwrote the previous image which was too small to read the details of the Constellation program. The image can be found here http://spaceflightsystems.grc.nasa.gov/LaunchSystems/Simulator/documents/USS%20Design.pdf I will be updating similar images with the larger version on the Constellation page so that users can actually read the image without much difficulties. ViriiK (talk) 19:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

change user name

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How can I change user name? Thanks. -Esun (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please pay attention when working on "Unknown" categories

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, please check the image data thoroughly before removing problem tags. Two images you removed the problem tags from (File:Salvador Dali Jose Moreno Villa Luis Bunuel Federico Garcia Lorca Jose Antonio.jpg and File:Beatrice Wood (1902).jpg) have been nominated for deletion by me and were deleted for the same reason the problem tag was set. Please make sure such mistakes don't occur too frequently. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 13:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Craseonycteris thonglongyai.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Craseonycteris thonglongyai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

• Rabo³ • 10:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Sergio.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Shizhao, we seem to have a small mess here. According to Special:Undelete/File:Sergio.jpg, you tagged and deleted this file. We have an OTRS e-mail stating that this was a photo done by the uploader's wife and edited by the uploader. The image was in use on his Wikipedia page. I believe it's enough we have an e-mail from the uploader stating the origin of the work. However, now someone uploaded a different image on top of this one. What do you suggest doing? We could move the present one to a new name and undelete the old one to the same name, perhaps? Patrícia msg 21:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why did you remove my uploaded image?????????????????

edit

Why the hell did you do that???? If you don't know the catogery its an belgian castle and i want you to upload it again as soon as you can!

Don't go deleting people's uploaded images after their back while not even letting them know stupid fuck why did you do delete that you had no problem with my image!?

What are you guys doing??

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I uploaded a perfectly legitimate image scanned from my 1880 personal copy of a book, Pope's History of India, to the English Wikipedia. The image was titled: File:Pope1880Sind2.jpg. The file had the complete uploading information, as do the other files from the same book I uploaded the same day 6 March 2009. (for example, File:Pope1880Oudh2.jpg. Some Wikipedian, in their infinite wisdom, decided to move the file to Wikicommons but forgot to add the uploading information, and then apparently, you, in your even more infinite wisdom decided to delete both image files (i.e. tossed out the baby with the bathwater). Do you think I have infinite time at my disposal to match your infinite wisdom and can infinitely keep uploading this image?? Are you perhaps being too busy a beaver for your own good (and without a doubt everybody else's)? Fowler&fowler (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just commenting out that there is no file that was ever uploaded as File:Pope1880Sind2.jpg check https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&hide_patrol_log=0&page=File%3APope1880Sind2.jpg ... Esby (talk) 09:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Translation request

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Shizhao! I tried to put a translation request on the Chinese language Village Pump, but it seems to be protected.

Anyway would you mind posting Chinese text to File:China Airlines B-18616 fire.jpg? Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 05:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Polish Paratroopers.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Polish Paratroopers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--81.156.184.142 10:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Jiangconst.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jiangconst.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Jiangconst.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio's

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nihau Shizhao. Could you please link speedies to the website of the original instead of the tineye search? The delete message will become more relevant that way. Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reply to speedy deletion nom.

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have posted a reply to the Mark Sanford image here. Hello32020 (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Verre de vin rose.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why did you mark this image as a copyvio? Multichill (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

It could be my fault I guess. I made a new version horizontally flipped to work alongside two other images lit from the opposite direction. Would this flag both up for copyvio? The original at least is PD so it doesn't make sense... --mixpix (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:New_York_1999_bruce_lee.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:New_York_1999_bruce_lee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mangostar (talk) 12:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Karsavas

edit

Hi Shizao, How Are You?. What image is similar to this?

File:KārsavasMapa.PNG
Karsavas

TinEye

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://blog.ideeinc.com/2009/07/08/wikimedia-commons-tineye/, regards, --Martin H. (talk) 01:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wow--shizhao (talk) 02:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Blue_&_green_of_Taiwan.png

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Blue_&_green_of_Taiwan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 11:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Polish Paratroopers.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Polish Paratroopers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Ranger Steve (talk) 17:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


Arilang1234 asking for help

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

你好, 我在 en:wiki, zh:wiki, wiki commons, wiki-source(中英), wiki-quote(中英) 都有 account. 現在 wikicommons 出了问題, 希望你能幫我.

請看:User talk:Arilang1234#Copyright violations, 謝謝. Arilang1234 Arilang talk 06:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

own work, see license Rapturerider (talk) 19:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Qing-Expansion.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Qing-Expansion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Zhxy 519 (talk) 16:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sz-iwbot

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

You should really check your bot because it's disrupting the Commons overall with it always placing the similar image tag, and not actually detecting any true copyright violations. Please, either fix it or stop it. It's not doing any good so far. GraYoshi2x (talk) 16:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agree, I cant find a community consensus for running this bot, please stop it right now. Huib talk 17:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Did you tag File:Ennea circle.gif and File:Ennea triangle.gif with {{No permission}} manually? Why? Do they contain something copyrightable and not clearly visible? --AVRS (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sz-iwbot

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have blocked this bot, as noted here. Please find a solution to the issue raised there, and I will unblock the bot for you (or ask any admin).  — Mike.lifeguard 23:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Kassaiemlekvertanuk.gif

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao:

I saw that you deleted this file. The deletion log says: "In category Unknown as of 10 June 2009; no license)". But after the warning was received, I added the license, but I left the template in the page because I didn't have the right to remove it.

Could I ask why the file was deleted? If was a problem with the license I would be glad to fix it.

--Mircalla22 (talk) 22:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

image deletion discussion

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

your recent deletions have been discussed at COM:AN Gnangarra 14:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:TrafficConeArt 2 from Burning Man.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:TrafficConeArt 2 from Burning Man.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Crapload (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:TrafficConeArt 1 from Burning Man.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:TrafficConeArt 1 from Burning Man.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Crapload (talk) 03:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:JDTractor chisel-plough.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, as I found out yout deleted the image File:JDTractor chisel-plough.jpg. Can you restore it, because i moved it from the English Wikipedia and I'm asolutely shure that it had correct information about source an license. -- MarkusHagenlocher (talk) 14:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your bot

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm going to unblock your bot per Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Serious_problems_with_bot_User:Sz-iwbot, however, it should only run checkimage.py for now. Before doing any more TinEye related edits, please make a new request at Commons:Bots/Requests for approval of this function. There we can talk about how to make it better. Thanks. Rocket000 (talk) 02:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bot

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Are you capable of maintaining your commons image bot without it malfunctioning? ---- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 07:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

所有你用BOT上的图片都有ERROR在INFO里。 -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 12:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: File:Qingdao Diederichsstein.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hi, I am puzzled by your {{Nsd}} tagging. The source of the picture is already given in English and in Japanese. Jappalang (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

此图的来源（以英文和日文）老早就有了，为何你挂个{{Nsd}}啊？Jappalang (talk) 22:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

It puzzles me as well. Shizhao, do you actually check the images or do you just tag everything without even glancing at them? Stuff like this completely confuses me; couldn't you just have checked the edit history and reverted the removal made on the 11th? I'm starting to suspect that you're running an unauthorized bot on your own user account. GraYoshi2x►talk 22:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The group of edits made on 12:54, 26 August 2009 raises my suspicions as well; it's extremely unlikely that anyone could remove all those tags and use the same edit summary all under a minute, not to mention the '(s)' attached to the end. Surely a human could distinguish between one or more tags? GraYoshi2x►talk 22:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
@GraYoshi, it appears this user is unable to communicate that well in English. @Shizhao, 你是否明白什么叫"copyvio"和"nsd"?你在COMMONS和WIKI上有个责任,责任就是监察好情况然后在去修改.你看起来很粗心. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs 12:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Berlinwall.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Berlinwall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--MGA73 (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could you make an admin required edit on zh.wikinews

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Trying to delete the almost universally replaced File:Flag of Japan (bordered) 3.svg. It has been completely replace with the exception of [11], I posted here on zh.wikinews but perhaps my google translated Chinese is not as good as it should be. All that needs to be done is to have File:Flag of Japan (bordered) 3.svg needs to be replaced with File:Flag of Japan (bordered).svg. Thanks --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your image

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can you please type in a flickrpass in your name dated to 18 December 2006 for this image you uploaded:

...like Admin Sanstein did here for this image he uploaded: [12]

I assume the flickr owner changed the license before it could be reviewed by the bot. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Sedna-NASA.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello shizhao, I have updated what I believe to be the source image (green circle) for the Sedna image. This Sedna image appears to be a Palomar image on the Caltech website. So what would be the status of this image? Can we claim PD-NASA? Do we need to upload the (yellow arrow) JPL PIA05568: Sedna Discovery Image? -- Kheider (talk) 08:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Hkstylebbq.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Hkstylebbq.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Leoboudv (talk) 19:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelecanus crispus at Beijing Zoo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Cayambe 08:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

请求删除

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

请帮助删除以下文件，原因已写明，非常感谢：
File:Xtreme_screenshot.png
File:Mephisto logopic.png
File:Magicangel_logopic.png
File:Neomule_logopic.png
--Tomchen1989 (talk) 14:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

CommonsDelinker won't do PNG -> SVG

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I see you added {{universal replace|60px-Nuvola german flag.svg.png|Nuvola German flag.svg|reason=Was in category "Duplicate", exact duplicate}} to the command page. The bot won't do things like that. Those aren't "exact duplicates". Please don't misuse that term. Thanks. Rocket000 (talk) 02:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate deletions and when not to execure them

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, you deleted File:Herr Seemann in jungen Jahren.TIF as a duplicate of File:Herr Seemann in jungen Jahren.JPG. Please do not delete TIF files as duplicates of JPG files. JPG has a lossy compression algorithm, meaning the quality of a TIF which is converted to JPG is always inferior to the quality of the original TIF. Please do not delete files as duplicates when they are not the same file type. Thanks and regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:735K52.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:735K52.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Wknight94 talk 19:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Sealandia_znaczek.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sealandia_znaczek.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Herr Kriss (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Apmmillenniumcity5.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Shizao, your file is still without categories ?! - can you add some? Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Anthus novaeseelandiae.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

I have remove the delinker template from File:Anthus novaeseelandiae.jpg as it is not an exact duplicate of File:Buller Fernbird and Pipit.jpg (they are scans from different copies of the book, different colour, lighting). There is no reason to delete it. I am not sure whether that is sufficient to stop it being deleted (may be in a queue somewhere?). Could you ensure it doesn't get deleted? Thanks :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Same goes for File:Eugene Delacroix-Nadar.jpg, not an exact duplicate of File:Félix Nadar 1820-1910 portraits Eugène Delacroix.jpg. Please be much more careful when checking duplicates. Thanks :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 05:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Also File:Coleman Livingston Blease.jpg is the original unedited version of File:ColemanBlease.jpg, not exact duplicate --Tony Wills (talk) 08:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Also File:Eugène Delacroix - Massacre at Chios.jpg and File:Eugène Delacroix - Le Massacre de Scio.jpg :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 09:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Apmmillenniumcity5.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Apmmillenniumcity5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pruneautalk 08:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for Image:Mobile phone.png

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:Mobile phone.png. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Ysangkok (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Renaming a file

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hello. sorry for bothering you. can you please rename a file for me?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ScummVM_0.13.0.png

ScummVM_0.13.0.png must be renamed to ScummVM_1.0.0.png as new version has been released. As you are the admin you naturally have privileges, so please help me with this.

Thanks in advance :) --Garrythefish (talk) 12:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

A big thanks

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

謝謝 :) --Garrythefish (talk) 12:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Taipei City flag.png

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Taipei City flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can we use some common sense on this

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I doubt you tagged the image originally, and unfortunately you probably didn't read the discussion on it at the duplicate at File:Oregon State Capitol 1.jpg, but the duplicate issue here has been handled very backwards. I, the image author, uploaded the image to en Wikipedia, then someone in France uploaded a copy to Commons, but all Frenchy. Fine. But then someone uploaded another copy, and did it right with licensing (and spelling). So then there were two. One version with an English name for something located in an English speaking country, an English description, a proper license, the proper date, and it included the metadata from the camera. The other is the French version, which had all these problems (I've now fixed most). So which one did we decide to delete? Common sense would say we should delete the French version, but that's not what is going to happen now that the delinker bot has been run. Can we maybe see about fixing this so it passes common sense? Aboutmovies (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Estacion_Fluvial_de_Rosario.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I took this picture with my own camera and you deleted it... --Robertoe (talk) 03:38, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:ChangchuanLiberated.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:ChangchuanLiberated.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--MtBell (talk) 15:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:030a Shrady portrait.tiff]

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I scanned this picture from a 1924 book published by the Government Printing Office. I've added some additional info about the book, hopefully enough to meet your standards.--Mrmdog (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Vivienda_en_Somosaguas.jpg

edit

I've indicated the web of image owner, because I have the explicit permission of to use this image.

File:Joaquín_Torres.jpg

edit

I've indicated the web of image owner, because I have the explicit permission of to use this image.

User:Sz-iwbot

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, will the TinEye check come back sometime? My proposal: The problem was, that the bot also found e.g. maps derivative of Commons or images from transwiki or pd-old images. You should restrict the bot on images with {{Own}} (or the equivalent wordings own work, Trabalho próprio, Eigene Arbeit, etc.) or with author=[[User:Example|Example]] only. For the moment this may help to sort out the images with wrong authors, the major problem on Commons, or images published elsewhere lacking evidence of permission. Also maps created as derivative works of other maps with wrong source information (own work only) will be marked. --Martin H. (talk) 08:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Unidentified Damselfly 5390.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pretty sure that had a licence. Also pretty sure common sense would dictate you check with the author. Please fix your mistake. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


missing categories File:27731555.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Shizhao, you have uploaded this file - can you add categories please? - it is a good foto, but I cannot read the chinese (?) description... Cholo Aleman (talk) 05:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Phorcys image

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is image of a mosaic, and is edited in the Microsoft Office picture manager.--Gospodar svemira (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Arches3d.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi!

why did you put a no source on this file File:Arches3d.jpg? It gives a source in the description. --Amada44 (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Assigning Catagories

edit

I uploaded two pictures recently: FP_Carpenters.jpg and FP_conducting.jpg

I have tried using your supposedly user friendly system "CommonSense" for identifying categories and it's suggestions were:

man woman Cultures of Denmark

WTF?

The pictures are of Frank Pooler and Richard and Karen Carpenter. How the heck did it come up with Cultures of Denmark? Your system is not user friendly nor is it intuitive to the uninformed.

I could never find any appropriate categories, and got so frustrated that I just put the following:

Frank Pooler The Carpenters

Open question

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please comment on User_talk:Sz-iwbot#Category_redirects. -- User:Docu at 08:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Shizhao. You have new messages at Sz-iwbot's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Cecil Bothwell by Steve Mann.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A permission was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, please check the OTRS in order to add the permission instead of tagging the image. Thanks. Hekerui (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Arnold Schwarzenegger in 1973.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can you explain why this media file is missing source information? It was posted on Flickr with the permission. — P.NaZ (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

LittleBigPlanetOfficialBox.png

edit

I found that image on English Wikipedia and I wanted to use it on Polish one, so I saved this file in Wikimedia Commons. I wrote who upload original file and add source (link to Wikipedia). Did I something wrong?

Sz-iwbot

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Shizhao, please take the time to respond to my question at User_talk:Sz-iwbot#Category_redirects. It seems that the bot keeps doing such moves. -- User:Docu at 10:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deleting duplicates

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey, I noticed you deleting duplicates. I appreciate your work, but please make sure that you replace the images first before deleting them. You've left quite a few links while deleting them (example). You can do this by adding {{universal replace|Old filename.ext|New filename.ext|reason=exact duplicate}} at User:CommonsDelinker/commands. Thanks. --The Evil IP address (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Kobe luminarie

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! I uploaded file of the image of special stamp for Kobe luminarie and you informe me that the licence wasn't correct. Can you help me to choose the correct one?I thought that for sure a stamp has an image of public demain, I have also the original one...--Guido Bellix (talk) 15:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Help

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola,antes me mandaste este mensaje y quisiera saber ¿qué licencia poner? o ¿qué le pasa al archivo?,tu ayuda me sera muy útil.Gracias:

 
File:Soldados_del_Regimiento_Tocopilla.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

shizhao (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC).Saludos--Israel soliz (talk) 17:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Files by USer:Doko

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why do you keep requesting permission for PD-art files?? --Eusebius (talk) 13:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Józef Bergier.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Shizhao. You have permanent permission for using Polish Senate images on GNU licence in relevant correspondence with Senat'a administration (you have it also in English version). Morover you have special template PolishSenateCopyright - used in about 150 (or more) images uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Have a nice day, Elfhelm (talk) 15:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File: Palarnia.jpg

edit

Hello, I'm the representative of "smoke'n'go" and "palarnie" distributor company. I have full rights to use this photo. I dont know which copyright notice to use. Please apply proper one. Thank You.

Images deleted (File:Lingerbliss myt.jpg, File:Lacri_12.jpg)

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Shizhao. I´ve got two images deleted between today and yesterday, fact that I don´t understand because I asked the author of the photographs to send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and I know with certainty he did because he sent a copy of thay e-mail to me. I´m kinda "angry" because it was not easy for me to contact the author, indeed he asked me why did I put his name in the first place instead of telling the pictures were mine in order to avoid all these procedures.

Files were http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Lacri_12.jpg http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Lingerbliss_myt.jpg

Please, at least I need an explanation.

(Sorry for my english) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.55.101.223 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 16. Dez. 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me, anyone there?--Anemonefield (talk) 17:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Rammasun 11 may 2008 0155Z.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This is a free image, released by to the public domain by NASA.

From the website's usage guidelines: "All the images that appear on our site are in the public domain and can be freely used and reproduced for any purpose. Please credit: "NASA/GSFC, MODIS Rapid Response." If publishing online, please link to the Rapid Response website. For more information on use and credit, contact the MODIS Rapid Response Outreach Coordinator."

Tag should be removed as information provided is sufficient and an advice, please look around the website for usage information before posting these claims. --Irfanfaiz (talk) 09:53, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I removed the template. Irfanfaiz (talk) 10:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
"Please look around the website for usage information before posting these claims."The burden of the proof is on the uploader. It's not our job to crawl the web looking for the information you should have provided in the first place. NASA websites usually contain both public domain and copyrighted images, and in any case, a precise source is always required. –Tryphon☂ 10:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah... But good to see this settled. Irfanfaiz (talk) 10:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Chèvre paon : bergamine.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hello,

you delete my picture (Bergamine.jpg) why ???? i'm sorry but I did'nt understand I'm new on wikièpedia ! This picture is free of copyright... So why ! There is no picture of "chèvre paon" on wikipédia... so How can i put a picture if this is'nt possible...

Thank you very much to make light on this mistake.

Tignol (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)TignolTignol (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fájl:Grof batthyany lajos elso miniszterelnokunk kivegzese.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there

User:Monkap my girlfriend transferred this file to Commons, with as she and I thought the appropriate information, and it is now marked as not being sourced. I imagine this is because she already marked it – as we usually do – as NowCommons (Hungarian: azonnali-commons) in the Wikipedia and it already got deleted. We can get it retrieved, I guess, but it is a legitimate use and is simply a case I think of it being deleted before you could verify so. Deleting it from Commons, then, would seem to make the problem worse as then there is no source in either place.

If you could advise when in the upload process (which is somewhat tedious anyway) we are expected to mark as Azonnali-commons (NowCommons), e.g. once it has been verified (and how would we know that?), then we will follow that process better in future.

Best wishes

SimonTrew (talk) 13:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

OJS-screenshot.png

edit

  Hi, why would you delete this screenshot? I took it by Wikipaedia! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OJS-screenshot.png You can check usage: http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php?i=OJS-screenshot.png&w=_100000

Marchitelli

Image deletion despite OTRS permission

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, I've seen that the files File:Jean-Pierre Papin.jpg and File:Alexander Vencel.jpg have been deleted today. A written permission has however been sent to OTRS on approximately Dec. 11, 2009. A few days later, the description page of said files also mentioned the OTRS permission. So I don't understand this deletion now. Can you confirm that the OTRS permission exists ? Thanks, --44Charles (talk) 13:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can you check the OTRS permission ? Thx, --44Charles (talk) 22:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removal of two speedy deletion templates from my images

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, the commons images File:Rugen_swamp.jpg, File:Rugen_beach.jpg are my own work. Details are on corresponding discussion pages ([13], [14]). Nevertheless, thanks for your conscientiousness. --FDominec (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

请删除File:南進／南进·_남진·Nam tiến·南進.png

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

该文件（File:南進／南进·_남진·Nam tiến·南進.png）与另一文件重复，且该文件命名有误，请将该文件删除。谢谢。--서공／Tây Cống／セイコゥ (talk) 16:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Skye nicolas dm1.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I notice you deleted this as no-permission, but the FlickreviewR has passed it. I have undeleted it, but feel free to change it if there is a bigger problem. Stifle (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

关于文件的删除

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

您好。请问file:Chữ Nôm-쯔놈-チュノム-喃字.png被删除以及被加入category:Other speedy deletions的理由是什么？谢谢。--서공／Tây Cống／セイコゥ (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-package-created.jpg


what permission do you expect for IExpress-package-created.jpg ? I have emailed that its screen shot and also emailed a message from Microsoft that they allow screen shots of their products on the web:

FYI http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/permissions/default.mspx#ERG SO please do not delete screen shots of Microsoft products unless they are altered or have some identifiable human face


Screen Shots You may not use screen shots of Microsoft product boot-up screens, opening screens, "splash screens," or screens from beta release products or other products that have not been commercially released. You may use other screen shots in advertising, in documentation (including educational brochures), in tutorial books, in videotapes, or on Web sites, provided that, in addition to the requirements above, you:

1. 

Do not alter the screen shot except to resize it.

2. 

Do not use portions of screen shots.

3. 

Do not include screen shots in your product user interface.

4. 

Do not use screen shots that contain third-party content.

5. 

Do not use screen shots that contain an image of an identifiable individual.

Top of page http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#5416690635140029490 --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-Create_package.jpg

http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#5416690644661891954 --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-package-created.jpg I took these TWO screen shots and I grant GPL to these images they are freeware use them as you like.

FULL EMAIL:

From: "Tushar Kapila" <tushar.kapila@gmail.com> To: <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Subject: Re: i grant GPL to these images they are freeware use them as you like Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:40:57 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008C_01CA81F7.CAD655F0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2096 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2096

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

=_NextPart_000_008C_01CA81F7.CAD655F0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

FYI http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/permissions/default.mspx#ERG SO = please do not delete screen shots of Microsoft products unless they are = altered or have some identifiable human face


Screen Shots You may not use screen shots of Microsoft product boot-up screens, = opening screens, "splash screens," or screens from beta release products = or other products that have not been commercially released. You may use = other screen shots in advertising, in documentation (including = educational brochures), in tutorial books, in videotapes, or on Web = sites, provided that, in addition to the requirements above, you: 

     1.
    Do not alter the screen shot except to resize it.
   =20
     2.
    Do not use portions of screen shots.
   =20
     3.
    Do not include screen shots in your product user interface.
   =20
     4.
    Do not use screen shots that contain third-party content.
   =20
     5.
    Do not use screen shots that contain an image of an identifiable =

individual. 

   =20

Top of page=20 http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#5416690635140029490 = --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-Create_package.jpg

http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#5416690644661891954 = --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-package-created.jpg I took these TWO screen shots and I grant GPL to these images they are = freeware use them as you like. Regards Tushar Kapila

Original Message -----=20 

 From: Tushar Kapila=20
 To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org=20
 Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 3:04 AM
 Subject: i grant GPL to these images they are freeware use them as you =

like=20 


 i grant GPL to these images they are freeware use them as you like, =

world! 

 http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#5416690635140029490 =
--> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-Create_package.jpg

 http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#5416690644661891954 =

--> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-package-created.jpg 

 these are freeware images=20
 free to use. GPL.=20

 Regards
 Tushar Kapila

 santaletternow.com     http://sel2in.com

 tushar.kapila@gmail.com yahoo : tushar.kapila@yahoo.com msn : =

tgkprog3@hotmail.com GTalk : tgkprog@gmail.com 

 http://stephenbrooks.org/muon1/ Volunteer computer idle time to =

science, is run by a friend; he has helped me with 2 algorithms. A child = genius was in oxford at age 17=20 

 www.thehungersite.com , and www.bhookh.com feed hungry , its free. =

www.ecologyfund.com 

 Please add these to your start-up how to: =

http://tusharkapila.blogspot.com/2008/05/s.html or bookmark all in one = folder in your browser and open all together so you remember to visit = all! you can even bookmark the individual tabs of the hunger site like = this for child health=20

=_NextPart_000_008C_01CA81F7.CAD655F0

Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2096" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>

FYI <A=20

href=3D"http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/permissions/default.mspx#ERG= ">http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/permissions/default.mspx#ERG</A>&n= bsp;SO=20 please do not delete screen shots of Microsoft products unless they are = altered=20 or have some identifiable human=20

face

Screen Shots

You may not use screen shots of Microsoft product boot-up screens, = opening=20 screens, "splash screens," or screens from beta release products or = other=20 products that have not been commercially released. You may use other = screen=20 shots in advertising, in documentation (including educational = brochures), in=20 tutorial books, in videotapes, or on Web sites, provided that, in = addition to=20 the requirements above, you:

<TBODY> </TBODY>

1.

Do not alter the screen shot except to resize it.

2.

Do not use portions of screen shots.

3.

Do not include screen shots in your product user = interface.

4.

Do not use screen shots that contain third-party = content.

5.

Do not use screen shots that contain an image of an = identifiable=20 individual.

<A=20

href=3D"http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/permissions/default.mspx#top= "><IMG=20 height=3D9 alt=3D"Top of page"=20 src=3D"http://www.microsoft.com/library/gallery/templates/MNP2.Common/ima= ges/arrow_px_up.gif"=20 width=3D7 border=3D0></A><A class=3DtopOfPage=20 href=3D"http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/permissions/default.mspx#top= ">Top of=20

page</A> 
<A=20

href=3D"http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#54166906351400= 29490">http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#541669063514002= 9490</A> =20 --> <A=20 href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-Create_package.jpg">ht= tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-Create_package.jpg</A></D= IV>

 
I took these TWO screen shots and I grant =

GPL to=20 these images they are freeware use them as you =

like.
Regards
Tushar Kapila
----- Original Message -----

<DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black">From:=20 <A title=3Dtushar.kapila@gmail.com = href=3D"mailto:tushar.kapila@gmail.com">Tushar=20

Kapila</A>

To: <A=20

title=3Dpermissions-commons@wikimedia.org=20 = href=3D"mailto:permissions-commons@wikimedia.org">permissions-commons@wik= imedia.org</A>=20

Sent: Saturday, December 19, =

2009 3:04=20

AM
Subject: i grant GPL to these =

images they=20

are freeware use them as you like

i grant GPL to these images they are =

freeware use=20

them as you like, world!
<A=20

= href=3D"http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#54166906351400= 29490">http://picasaweb.google.com/Tushar.Kapila/IExpress#541669063514002= 9490</A> =20 --> <A=20 = href=3D"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-Create_package.jpg">ht= tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IExpress-Create_package.jpg</A></D= IV>

 
 
these are =

freeware=20

images
<FONT=20 face=3DArial>
free to =

use. GPL.=20


Regards
Tushar Kapila
<A=20

title=3D"Gift your child a real Santa letter this year, only $7/-"=20 href=3D"http://santaletternow.com/?eml=3Dt">santaletternow.com</A> =    =20 <A title=3D"Java, PHP, VB6 Apps. Fight Back pain: Exercise timer = application "=20 href=3D"http://sel2in.com">http://sel2in.com</A>

<A=20 href=3D"mailto:tushar.kapila@gmail.com">tushar.kapila@gmail.com</A> = yahoo : <A=20 href=3D"mailto:tushar.kapila@yahoo.com">tushar.kapila@yahoo.com</A> = msn : <A=20 href=3D"mailto:tgkprog3@hotmail.com">tgkprog3@hotmail.com</A> GTalk : = <A=20

href=3D"mailto:tgkprog@gmail.com">tgkprog@gmail.com</A>
<A=20

= href=3D"http://stephenbrooks.org/muon1/">http://stephenbrooks.org/muon1/<= /A>=20 Volunteer computer idle time to science, is run by a friend; he has = helped me=20 with 2 algorithms. A child genius was in oxford at age 17
<A=20 href=3D"http://www.thehungersite.com">www.thehungersite.com</A> , and = <A=20 href=3D"http://www.bhookh.com ">www.bhookh.com </A>feed hungry , its = free. <A=20 =

href=3D"http://www.ecologyfund.com">www.ecologyfund.com</A>
</DI=

V>

Please add these to your start-up how to: <A=20

= href=3D"http://tusharkapila.blogspot.com/2008/05/s.html">http://tusharkap= ila.blogspot.com/2008/05/s.html</A>=20 or bookmark all in one folder in your browser and open all together so = you=20 remember to visit all! you can even bookmark the individual tabs of = the hunger=20 site like this <A=20 = href=3D"http://www.thehungersite.com/clickToGive/home.faces?siteId=3D5&am= p;link=3Dctg_chs_home_from_ths_home_sitenav">for=20

child health</A>
</BODY></HTML>
=_NextPart_000_008C_01CA81F7.CAD655F0--

---

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shizhao/2009&oldid=78502935"
Return to the user page of "Shizhao/2009".