User talk:Trougnouf/Archive 2018 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This looks a bit underexposed, doesn't it? --Basotxerri 06:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC) I don't have the raw files with me unfortunately so I won't be able to edit for this nomination period --Trougnouf 08:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)  Done --Trougnouf 23:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Street art

Salut Benoît !

J'ai reçu la remarque suivante, qui me laisse perplexe : "J'ai l'impression que la catégorie "street art in Louvain-la-Neuve" contient principalement des photos qui ont leur place dans une categorie "public art in Louvain-la-Neuve". Voir la distinction «art urbain» et «art public»."

L'article Wikipédia "Art urbain" dit que c'est principalement un "art éphémère".

J'aimerais avoir ton avis : doit-on créer une nouvelle catégorie et basculer toutes les photos de la catégorie "street art in Louvain-la-Neuve" vers cette catégorie ?

Il est vrai que la page WP "Liste des œuvres publiques de Louvain-la-Neuve" pointe vers la page "Art public"...

Merci d'avance pour ton avis !

EmDee (talk) 14:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour EmDee,

En effet Category:Street art est une sous-catégorie de Category:Public art qui dénote "usually unsanctioned artwork", ce qui n'était pas le cas pour les oeuvres qui étaient présente dans Category:Street art in Louvain-la-Neuve. J'ai déplacé ces images dans Category:Public art in Louvain-la-Neuve (et Category:Sculptures in Louvain-la-Neuve), il reste enormement de travail car cette confusion est présente dans la plupart des categories "Street art" de chaque pays et villes (qui souvent n'ont meme pas "Public art" comme parent), j'ai mis un message de clarification sur la page Category:Street art pour débuter.

--Trougnouf (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Janshuismolen in Bruges, Belgium (DSCF4838).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bathtubs in Chateau de l'Hermitage, Hauts-de-France (DSCF4938).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Squaw Lakes, OR (DSC 0160).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Bad sources

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Soyuz_rocket_and_spaceship_V1-1.svg&diff=307528459&oldid=306894012

I see you generally do good work, but this is obviously not okay, I hope you understand that. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Alexis Jazz I copied the list of sources embedded in the SVG by the author, because several FPC reviewers including myself couldn't find the author's sources and the author was not responding (see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Soyuz rocket and spaceship V1-1.svg). What is not okay about that edit? --Trougnouf (talk) 02:26, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Trougnouf,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portland, OR (DSC 0283).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portland, OR (DSC 0242).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7649).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - June - On the move/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Garden snail moving down the Vennbahn in disputed territory (DSCF5879).jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge On the move, in June 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Seymour Provincial Park, BC (DSCF9083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Could definitely be sharper, but still a QI. --GerifalteDelSabana 06:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Seymour Provincial Park, BC (DSCF8936).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:01, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Seymour Provincial Park, BC (DSCF8557).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 00:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Seymour Provincial Park, BC (DSCF9036).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice forest photo --Podzemnik 00:08, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Seymour Provincial Park, BC (DSCF8496).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very dark on the left. But beautiful motive for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:47, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7828).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7773).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7743).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7818).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualit. --GT1976 06:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7884).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 15:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7499).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Draft horse pulling logs in Parc naturel Hautes Fagnes, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour 54 to 55, DSCF3703).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Draft horse pulling logs in Parc naturel Hautes Fagnes, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour 54 to 55, DSCF3703).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marolles from Place Poelaert, Brussels (DSCF6759).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm afraid the file name, category and description lose their relevance here. There's nothing in this image that speaks of the cyclonudista.--Peulle 20:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC) you are right, rename request  Done --Trougnouf 20:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Good, that should go through no problem.--Peulle 20:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponttor, Aachen, DE (DSCF5900).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pudelek 20:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moving walkway through the A-gates of Brussels Airport (DSCF7310).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street performers on Carrefour de l'Europe, Brussels, BE (DSCF6730).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 12:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prinsenkasteel in Grimbergen, BE (DSCF7234).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stawamus Chief Provincial Park, BC (DSCF7644).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Seymour Provincial Park, BC (DSCF8864).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruges, BE (DSCF4814) Passenger looking through the window in an SNCB train from Brussels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruges, BE (DSCF4816) Korte Vuldersstraat, looking towards Sint-Salvatorskerkhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Place Flower Carpet 2018 (30mm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruges, BE (DSCF4824) Spiegelrei (left), Spinolarei (right), Jan van Eyckplein (origin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Columba livia in Belgium

Hi Trougnouf - Category:Columba livia in Belgium duplicates the existing Category:Feral pigeons in Belgium - mind if I merge them? The species is only present in Belgium as feral (ex-domesticated) birds, not natural wild-type birds. - MPF (talk) 00:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi MPF, not at all, thank you for the heads up. That means I should categorize all future Belgian Columba livia I run into as Category:Feral pigeons in Belgium right? --Trougnouf (talk) 01:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Yep, that's right (unless of course they are captive domesticated birds :-) MPF (talk) 08:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Place Flower Carpet 2018 (18mm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruges, BE (DSCF4827) Langerei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruges, BE (DSCF4831) looking North from the Snaggaardstraat bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Victor (Petigny - Couvin, DSC 0525).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street musician in Brussels Central Station (DSCF7054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de l'Hermitage (DSCF4936).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks like the sides are leaning out a bit.--Peulle 11:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  Done I did the perspective correction again, based on the windows-only, I think it's straight now. --Trougnouf 17:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  Support lively and accurate photo, thank you, --Khanaon 12:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournai, BE (DSCF5135) Château de Jules César in Vaulx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Grande Traversée de la Forêt du Pays de Chimay (DSC 0772) Entering Vierves-sur-Viroin from the South bridge over the Viroin river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curved glass as seen from inside the MAS museum (Antwerp, BE).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Autopatroller

Bonjour, Je t'ai donné les droits d'autopatroller. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Merci :) --Trougnouf (talk) 09:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerp, BE (DSC 0087) Museum aan de Stroom (MAS) facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Trougnoufsandbox.png

Copyright status: File:Trougnoufsandbox.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Trougnoufsandbox.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@JuTa:  Done--Trougnouf (talk) 18:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerp, BE (DSC 0192) Antwerpen-Centraal railway station main hall ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you....

For review mi pictures, this night (in Argentina) I'll to fix it. Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 13:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Commons:DtMediaWiki

Hey!

Thank you so much for making this! I had done some superficial investigation on an upload module for darktable some time ago − I am *so* glad to see that you made a plugin! I will give it a try soon and let you know how it goes :)

Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 21:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm very glad it found a happy user already :) I've been enjoying the crazy amount of time I save from using this plugin and the added categorization it can automatically perform.

Please let me know of any bug and/or feature request you may have. I will be off on a bicycle adventure from September 5th to 16th and I will happily implement them when I come back.

Since it's very early (first successful upload yesterday) everything is logged into the terminal so you can see what's happening by launching "darktable -d lua".

Happy post-processing!

--Trougnouf (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de la Louve (DSC 0377).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Martin in Wasmes-Audemez-Briffœil (DSCF5064) Péruwelz, Belgium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Michel church in Fontenoy (DSCF5104) Antoing, Belgium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournai, BE (DSCF5154) Looking up from a 19th century lime kiln during civil twilight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very interesting --Podzemnik 04:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Het Zinneke (DSCF5238) Brussels, BE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Gengoul et Lac des Doyards (DSCF5673) Vielsalm, BE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournai, BE (DSCF5144) 19th century lime kiln standing next to a modern factory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournai, BE (DSCF5138) 19th century lime kiln standing next to a modern factory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Briffoeil in Péruwelz (DSCF5050) Chapelle 57064-INV-0117-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, but it needs a perspective correction (see note) --Michielverbeek 18:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)  Done thank you for reviewing! I gave it another shot, but that line in your note can't be straight because the chapel's walls are angled (/‾\, "correcting" it would make the front part of the chapel completely wonky) --Trougnouf 19:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)  SupportMore then good, now! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Michel, Braffe (DSCF5029).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI imo. --ArildV 20:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sourbrodt train station signal box (DSCF5821) Waimes, Belgium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the power lines but Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retired overhead line rail service vehicle in Sourbrodt train station (DSCF5823) Waimes, Belgium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Antoine de Petit-Thier and a backpacking cyclist (DSCF5678) Vielsalm, BE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 05:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Briffoeil in Péruwelz (DSCF5048) 57064-INV-0117-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavoir Dubuisson-Copin in Péruwelz, Belgium (DSCF4922).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of a castle in Péruwelz (DSCF5045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lemonnier premetro station rails tunnel in Brussels, BE (DSCF5655).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freight car in Sourbrodt train station, Waimes, Belgium (DSCF5825).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tank car in Sourbrodt train station (DSCF5827).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Architas 15:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lever frame in the Sourbrodt train station signal box (DSCF5829).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:40, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de l'Assomption in Plombières, BE (DSCF5924).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:32, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Brice in Plombières, Belgium (DSCF5940).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Loi, European Quarter in Brussels during civil twilight (DSCF6957).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall lamp in salle des mariages, Brussels town hall (DSCF6843).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 flower carpet at Grand Place, Brussels (DSCF6849).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former town hall of Overijse, Belgium (DSCF7525).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paroisse Saint-Antoine de Padoue in Wavre, Belgium (DSCF7546).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collège Notre-Dame de Basse-Wavre entrance (DSCF7557).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancien couvent des Carmes Chaussés de Wavre (DSCF7570).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice perspective and overall good quality. But like in the other picture saturation is a bit high. --Zinnmann 21:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)  Done, thank you for reviewing! Let me know if this is good and I will apply similar settings to the panorama. --Trougnouf 22:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Looks fine for me, now! Thank you! --Zinnmann 00:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Martin de Limal in Wavre, Belgium (DSCF7573).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paroisse Saint-Géry in Limelette, Belgium (DSCF7575).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Rémi church in Ottignies, Belgium (DSCF7576).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 21:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Martinuskerk in Overijse, Belgium (DSCF7537, DSCF7541).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 12:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 21:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausolée Goblet d'Alviella in the Court-Saint-Étienne cemetery, looking NW (DSCF7597).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceulemans monument in Court-Saint-Étienne cemetery (DSCF7601).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 14:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken-Pis decorated with flowers (DSCF6364).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brussels town hall wedding room (DSCF6767).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michèle Loijens, Benoit Hellings, and Yolande Duviver compaigning for Ecolo on Rue des Tanneurs (Brussels) (DSCF0952).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken-Pis 1000th costume (DSCF6202).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stilter welcoming new residents in front of the Auderghem cultural center (DSCF6322).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Yann 14:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Gembloux with belfry visible in the background (DSCF7616).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I memorial in Gembloux (DSCF7634).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Gembloux (DSCF7636).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Lambert in Corroy-le-Château (DSCF7652-DSCF7653).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame de Hal chapel in Gembloux, Belgium (DSCF7607).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour du Guet in parc d'Epinal, Gembloux, Belgium (DSCF7618).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback!

Thanks for your kind feedback on my photos. I appreciate the help! Nheyob (talk) 13:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

What software do you recommend for perspective correction? Nheyob (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Screenshot of darktable's perspective correction tool

You are welcome :) darktable has a very convenient perspective correction tool, you can select the horizontal and vertical lines and it will do all the required adjustments. --Trougnouf (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I will look it up and play with it. Have a great day! Nheyob (talk) 11:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Corroy-le-Château (DSCF7659-DSCF7662).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO a little bit too dark. --XRay 04:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Done new version uploaded, thank you! --Trougnouf 09:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 10:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gembloux Abbey, current home of Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (DSCF7631).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The building is too dark and the sky too bright IMO. --Ermell 20:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)  Done new version uploaded --Trougnouf 20:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La locomotive in Aubel, Belgium (DSCF5959).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks like it's enjoying it's retirement --Daniel Case 17:32, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de l'Hermitage (DSCF4935).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très joli. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour d'enceinte des Sarrasins à Gembloux (DSCF7649).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! École primaire de Viesville (DSCF7676).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:57, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Charleroi (DSCF7691).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais des beaux-arts de Charleroi (DSCF7692).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden of Kunstberg viewed from Mont des Arts during nautical twilight (DSCF1028).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 02:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate of Harmonious Interest in Victoria, BC (DSCF5787).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame du Sacré-Coeur à Viesville (DSCF7678-DSCF7680).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think all four images are slightly dark. --ArildV 14:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)  Done I reuploaded all four images, thank you! --Trougnouf 20:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Ok imo. --ArildV 19:54, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausolée Goblet d'Alviella in Court-Saint-Étienne, Belgium (DSCF7579).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Leaving the sky mostly blown out helps keep focus on the mausoleum --Daniel Case 02:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NW view of the Court-Saint-Étienne cemetery from the Mausolée Goblet d'Alviella (DSCF7584).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting viewpoint --Daniel Case 02:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SW view in the Mausolée Goblet d'Alviella in the Court-Saint-Étienne cemetery (DSCF7587).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some might say a little dark but I think that works here --Daniel Case 02:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Christophe de Charleroi (DSCF7701).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caserne Caporal Trésignies in Charleroi (DSCF7708).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I memorial in Parc Reine Astrid, Charleroi (DSCF7704).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucky Luke statue in parc Reine Astrid, Charleroi (DSCF7707).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel des Postes in Charleroi (DSCF7715).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Charleroi and "Passation" artwork by Martin Guyaux (DSCF7690).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you brighten the shadows a bit? Maybe generally underexposed and the saturation seems a bit low, everything looks quite grey. --Basotxerri 14:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)  Done, thank you. I increased the shadows a bit (and a bunch of other stuff as I processed it differently). It seems a little bit more "lively" now but still gray, I was surprised when I saw this tint on most of my pictures from Charleroi (and a little bit farther during that bicycling day) but I think this lack of saturation is what the region is known for (that's after using the spot white balance too, before it was dull and cold) --Trougnouf 17:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)  Support A boring grey city? ;-) Thank you, better now! --Basotxerri 18:09, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Pierre church in Liberchies, Pont-à-Celles, Belgium (DSCF7668).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Monceau-sur-Sambre (DSCF7733).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye d'Aulne (DSCF7746).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin church in Marcinelle, Charleroi (DSCF7717).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please have a look to the weather vane at the top, there are minor CAs. --XRay 07:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)  Comment CA removed, thank you! --Trougnouf 11:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bois du Cazier in Marcinelle, Charleroi (DSCF7718).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:02, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de la Sainte-Vierge à Marchienne-au-Pont, Charleroi (DSCF7723-DSCF7725).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château Bilquin-de Cartier in Marchienne-au-Pont, Charleroi (DSCF7726-DSCF7728).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak support. It was a rainy day, yes, but sharpness could be better. May be there are other opinions. --XRay 07:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)  Comment I made it a bit sharper, thank you! --Trougnouf 11:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château Bilquin-de Cartier from the North bank of the Sambre river (DSCF7729).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour du Guet on Rue Docq in Gembloux, Belgium (DSCF7610).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Think you could fix that sky some more? --Daniel Case 02:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)  Done I think so --Trougnouf 09:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)  Support OK --Daniel Case 03:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Louis de Gonzague church in Monceau-sur-Sambre, Charleroi (DSCF7730).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To crop the picture on the right is perhaps more beautiful. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Écluse n°8 à Fontaine-l'Évêque en Belgique (DSCF7737).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Bailli in Gembloux, Belgium (DSCF7611).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice, Binche (DSCF7795-DSCF7797).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue du musicien à Binche (DSCF7799).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Elisabeth church in Binche, Belgium (DSCF7800).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue Le Gille à Binche (DSCF7804).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye d'Aulne (DSCF7748).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entering Thuin from the East side on Chemin de Halage (DSCF7751).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 04:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Thuin and its belfry from the North bank of La Sambre (DSCF7752).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Thuin (DSCF7769-DSCF7771).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Spantole et le Rempart du Nord à Thuin (DSCF7782).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit too dark. --XRay 04:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)  Done it's a little bit brighter now, thank you! --Trougnouf 20:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrum De Calidris in Middelkerke, Belgium (DSCF9885).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not the greatest of days weatherwise, but the building came out well, and maybe it was better to photograph it in this light. --Daniel Case 01:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue d'Arlequin devant le musée international du Carnaval et du Masque à Binche (DSCF7805).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Touzrimounir 10:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Ursmer photographed from musée international du Carnaval et du Masque in Binche, Belgium (DSCF7808).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Ursmer, Binche (DSCF7813).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft but OK. --Peulle 09:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Ursmer, Binche (DSCF7830).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Ursmer, Binche (DSCF7831).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the SE city walls of Binche (DSCF7812).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House eaten up by vegetation along the RAVeL L422 in Battignies (DSCF7850).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Antoine de Padoue, La Louvière (DSCF7853).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 1, Houdeng-Goegnies (DSCF7857).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Ursmer, Binche (DSCF7814).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bois-du-Luc workers' housing (DSCF7864).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Jacques, Tournai (DSCF8523).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:13, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Binche (DSCF7828).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The building behind the window hole suggests that the image is tilted. Check contrast and saturation, too, but this might be a problem of my laptop monitor. --Basotxerri 14:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)  Done I think I addressed both issues, good find / thank you --Trougnouf 15:44, 5 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:07, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Monceau-sur-Sambre in Charleroi, Belgium (DSCF7731).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But IMO half of the sky could be cropped out. --XRay 05:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)  Done cropped out some sky, thank you. --Trougnouf 17:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste in Wavre, Belgium (DSCF7560).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bois-du-Luc foundry (DSCF7869).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The foundry in Bois-du-Luc (DSCF7889).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The foundry in Bois-du-Luc (DSCF7895).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 15:02, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Female human being holding a homegrown zucchini in Quesnel, British Columbia (DSCF5368).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unnaturally posed photo -- Spurzem 19:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Not exactly an appealing image but good quality nevertheless. --MB-one 18:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bicolor cat residing in the Bois-du-Luc workers' housing (DSCF7921).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 2, Houdeng-Aimeries (DSCF7927).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 09:03, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Thuin seen from the bridge on Rue d'Anderlues (DSCF7758).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for such a grey sky --Michielverbeek 19:01, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND gnome ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd crop it on both sides to have a portrait image, it is slightly tilted and the WB is to yellowish --Poco a poco 20:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)  Done (I used the least red most blue wb of the set). Thank you! --Trougnouf 21:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO200.jpg

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO200.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO800.jpg

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO800.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO3200.jpg

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO3200.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted work by Jean Rets (d. 1998), permission from his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, the image was labeled as a work of Jean Rets, who died only in 1998, whereby his works are copyrighted til year 2068. As there was no evidence of a permission, speedy deletion was appropriate. However, if you can provide a valid permission, we can discuss a temporary undeletion until validity is proven. However, I'm offline now for at least 14 hours. --Túrelio (talk) 23:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Thank you for your response. I didn't realize this was a speedy deletion request (as all the other ones aren't) and that artwork posted in museums would be protected by copyright law in Belgium. I'm looking into the legal aspect then I will contact the permission holders. --Trougnouf (talk) 08:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO6400.jpg

File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO6400.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:NIND MuseeL-roue ISO1250.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NIND MuseeL-roue ISO1250.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NIND MuseeL-roue ISO1250.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:NIND MuseeL-roue ISO800.jpg
• File:NIND MuseeL-roue ISO6400.jpg
• File:NIND MuseeL-roue ISO200.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done --Trougnouf (talk) 21:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:NIND MuseeL-plaster ISO400.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NIND MuseeL-plaster ISO400.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NIND MuseeL-plaster ISO400.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:NIND MuseeL-plaster ISO5000.jpg
• File:NIND MuseeL-plaster ISO6400.jpg
• File:NIND MuseeL-plaster ISO200.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:NIND MuseeL-Bonnet ISO500.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NIND MuseeL-Bonnet ISO500.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NIND MuseeL-Bonnet ISO500.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:NIND MuseeL-Bonnet ISO4000.jpg
• File:NIND MuseeL-Bonnet ISO200.jpg
• File:NIND MuseeL-Bonnet ISO6400.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Garden of Kunstberg viewed from Mont des Arts during nautical twilight (DSCF1028).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garden of Kunstberg viewed from Mont des Arts during nautical twilight (DSCF1028).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 2, Houdeng-Aimeries (DSCF7937).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 07:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 3, Strépy-Bracquegnies (DSCF7942).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salle des machines de l'ascenseur à bateaux du Canal du Centre no 3 à Strépy-Bracquegnies (DSCF7948).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 3, Strépy-Bracquegnies (DSCF7949).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Machine room building of the Boat Lift Nº 3 on the Canal du Centre in Strépy-Bracquegnies (DSCF7953).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Waltrude Collegiate Church (DSCF8111).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'Attre (DSCF8172).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Burbant, Ath (DSCF8179).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée international du Carnaval et du Masque à Binche (DSCF7810).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Upper part is a little bit noisy, but is good quality for me. Tournasol7 05:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)  Done slightly stronger denoising applied, thank you! --Trougnouf 18:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Valenciennoise (DSCF8038).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 17:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butterfly bush growing on the city walls of Binche (DSCF7835).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You need to identify the species --Poco a poco 07:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC) I don't think I can find more than the genus, it's an invasive species, most common one seems to be Buddleja davidii and that looks like it but there are over 140 species and it's commonly mislabeled so it might as well be anything else --Trougnouf 16:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Ok --Poco a poco 06:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 1, Houdeng-Goegnies (DSCF7861).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:09, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-Moschophore ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 10:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 1, Houdeng-Goegnies (DSCF7860).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Clouds are problematic, trees are unsharp—but neither of them are the subject, and what is is captured as no doubt intended. --Daniel Case 03:48, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-ram ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-cross ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-fuite ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Seymour Provincial Park, BC (DSCF8976).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Berlière (DSCF8202).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-yombe ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 08:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I memorial in Houtaing (DSCF8205).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausolée d’Oultremont (DSCF8207).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-theatre ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Needs material related category. --MB-one 20:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC) Done, thank you! --Trougnouf 21:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Onze-Lieve-Vrouwkerk in Pittem, Belgium (DSCF0038).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 04:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Michel à Fontenoy (DSCF8227).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 11:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Tournai (DSCF8337).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odiel Defraeye memorial in Rumbeke, Belgium (DSCF0017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 13:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal du Centre - Ascenseur no 4, Thieu (DSCF8014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 07:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mons (DSCF8074).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Sainte-Waudru de Mons (DSCF8090).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 07:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-inspiredlotus ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 12:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-ambon ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 09:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-text ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 12:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-pedestal ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 12:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le jeu de fer de Tournai (DSCF8331).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Trous at night (DSCF8342).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Trous at night (DSCF8343).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Trous at night (DSCF8344).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 12:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-painting ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 18:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Workers' housing in Bois-du-Luc (DSCF7923).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd consider cropping out that bit of overexposed sky, or doing something about it. --Daniel Case 07:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)  cropped --Trougnouf 15:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC) Good now. Daniel Case 02:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-Ndengese ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 13:19, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND threebicycles ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 17:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoary Marmot in Glacier National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo of the marmot and possible FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 09:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 09:39, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND wall ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND Saint-Remi ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND Saint-Remi-C ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 15:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-stele ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Unfortunately the object hangs tilted but the joints of the concrete wall are straight so it's OK. --Basotxerri 16:12, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Brice pendant la grande procession de Tournai (DSCF8683).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Guidon Hesbignon pendant la grande procession de Tournai (DSCF8935).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk van Pamele (DSCF9145).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:51, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbey of Maagdendale in Oudenaarde (DSCF9199-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The reflection is amazing. --Syed07 11:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-Bobo ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 11:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mortiersmolen, Zwevegem (DSCF9230,DSCF9231).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality Seven Pandas 01:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klockemolen, Zwevegem (DSCF9232).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque of steam locomotive Haine-Saint-Pierre No. 1378-1922 in Baasrode-Noord train station, Dendermonde (DSCF0551).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steam locomotive Haine-Saint-Pierre No. 1378-1922 in Baasrode-Noord train station, Dendermonde (DSCF0566).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oudenaarde town hall (DSCF9182-DSCF9186).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Maria-Bernardakerk in Zwevegem (DSCF9224).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The cars are disturbing, but you can not do much about that. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Tournai (DSCF8271-DSCF8281).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 04:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Berlière (DSCF8192).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 04:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND Stevin ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 04:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND sevenbicycles ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendermonde town hall and belfry during golden hour (DSCF0501).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC) Of these two this one is better. You shouldn't report the similar photos. Tournasol7 07:03, 26 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 09:32, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Laarne (DSCF0335).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walboskasteel in Destelbergen, Belgium (DSCF0334).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liberation monument in Tielt, Belgium (DSCF0068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intérieur de l'église Saint-Rémi d'Ottignies (DSCF1834).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:20, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Pierre de Leuze-en-Hainaut (DSCF8217-DSCF8220).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Guidon Hesbignon on Grand-Place during the great procession of Tournai (DSCF8921).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tandem mounted flutists of the Royal Guidon Hesbignon performing at Grand-Place during the great procession of Tournai (DSCF8867).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained-glass windows in Cathédrale Notre-Dame, Tournai (DSCF8354).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of église Saint-Jacques, Tournai (DSCF8533).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazandmolen in Roeselare (DSCF0018).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardooie Castle (DSCF0027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaagtmolen in Ruiselede, Belgium (DSCF0070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knokmolen and smoke in Ruiselede, Belgium (DSCF0075).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please fix the tilt and remove the two spots on the right image border. --Basotxerri 08:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)  Done, thank you! --Trougnouf 09:25, 27 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmolen Hostens in Ruiselede, Belgium (DSCF0076).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND MuseeL-pinklotus ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some natural noise notwithstanding, it's good --Daniel Case 00:58, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rentrée de la grande procession de Tournai à la cathédrale (DSCF8779).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Skrissh 05:12, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendermonde town hall and belfry during civil twilight (DSCF0517).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parochiekerk Sint-Amandus in Leupegem (DSCF9201).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eclectic corner house on Arbeidstraat 2 in Aalst, Belgium (DSCF0387).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Leon Leander Bekaert in Zwevegem, Belgium (DSCF9239).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would remove the twig in the top right, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 07:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)  twigs begone, thank you! --Trougnouf 19:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Kortrijk (DSCF9258).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty town hall, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerechtshof in Ypres (DSCF9413).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Breendonk entrance (DSCF0597).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Wow, if you go any further, you will be shot! -- Ikan Kekek 07:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Antoniuskerk in Kortrijk (DSCF9247).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decorated utility cabinet in Mechelen, Belgium (DSCF0829).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Walburgakerk in Oudenaarde (DSCF9191).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onze-Lieve-Vlouv-ten-Hemelopnemingskerk, Ruiselede (DSCF0084).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hoary Marmot in Glacier National Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hoary Marmot in Glacier National Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vredegerecht, Eeklo (DSCF0161).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 17:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geeraard de Duivelsteen, Ghent (DSCF0291).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 11:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Aalst (DSCF0411).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Martinuskerk, Aalst (DSCF0412-DSCF0421).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint Egidius intra muros, Dendermonde (DSCF0518).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 16:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeentehuis Ruiselede (DSCF0086).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Could be a little bit brighter. --XRay 05:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)  Done, thank you! --Trougnouf 19:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall and belfry of Eeklo (DSCF0141).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too bright, but good quality for me. --Tournasol7 07:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC) a bit darker thank you! --Trougnouf 21:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pink mountain-heather in Clearwater Wilderness, WA (DSC 0663).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Skrissh 04:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Tielt (DSCF0059).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Sorrows neogothic chapel in Tielt, Belgium (DSCF0045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Pieterskerk, Tielt (DSCF0047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 02:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerechtsgebouw, Dendermonde (DSCF0521).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onze-Lieve-Vrouw van Goede Hoopkerk, Vilvoorde (DSCF0943).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Peter's Church, Leuven (DSCF0898).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumbeke Castle E (DSCF0005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broeltorens, Kortrijk (DSCF9278).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:47, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Geboortekerk, Bellem (DSCF0103-DSCF0106).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel van Ronsele (DSCF0132).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 14:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Mariahove, Bellem (DSCF0109).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gravensteen, Ghent (DSCF0191).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onze-Lieve-Vrouwhospitaal, Kortrijk (DSCF9283).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Menen (DSCF9322).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Franciscuskerk, Menen (DSCF9328).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karmelietenklooster interior, Ypres (DSCF9471).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parochiekerk Sint-Amands, Roeselare (DSCF9989).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good in a lot of ways, but the highlights are blown on the statue. Could you tone them down some? -- Ikan Kekek 11:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)  Comment  Done as well as various improvements, thank you! --Trougnouf 20:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)  Support - Sure thing. Good enough for QI now. -- Ikan Kekek 22:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel d'Aertrycke (DSCF9933).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmolen Margrietmolen, Lo-Reninge (DSCF9531).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Hill 62 Memorial (DSCF9375).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parochiekerk Sint-Petrus en Paulus in Rumbeke (DSCF0016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadian Hill 62 Memorial (DSCF9376).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maple Copse Cemetery (DSCF9398).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voormezeele Enclosures No.1 and No.2 (DSCF9482).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Pieterskerk, Lo (DSCF9550).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Diksmuide (DSCF9585).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloned Paardenvisser by William Sweetlove (DSCF9833).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Cogels in Middelkerke, Belgium (DSCF9909).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but at the top a bit unsharp --Michielverbeek 07:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmolen Oude Zeedijkmolen (DSCF9628).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:46, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Roeselare (DSCF9975).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladslo German war cemetery (DSCF9597).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Martinuskerk, Zomergem (DSCF0129).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shrimp fishing Brabançon draft horse in Oostduinkerke (DSCF9699).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the sky :-( , but the horse is fine, therefore QI for me --Isiwal 09:15, 9 November 2018 (UTC) Thank you :) The sky is actually not overexposed at all, there's some subtle detail and shade here and there but mostly it's a (beautiful imo) naturally white background. --Trougnouf 12:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psychiatrisch Centrum Sint-Jan, Eeklo (DSCF0164).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Shame about that tree shadow, though --Daniel Case 18:03, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel Terlinden, Aalst (DSCF0381).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall and belfry of Lo (DSCF9552).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Nieuwpoort (DSCF9870).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Doris, Middelkerke (DSCF9903).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Unusual image format ;-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Franciscuskerk, Menen (DSCF9330).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 12:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Ghent (DSCF0247,DSCF0249).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:47, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belfry of Ghent (DSCF0285-DSCF0289).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:47, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Niklaaskerk and the belfry of Ghent (DSCF0274).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I love the lighting. --Seven Pandas 12:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall and belfry of Lier (DSCF0654).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perspective very straight done. Btw: I know Lier is a relative small beautiful town --Michielverbeek 11:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady of Hanswijk in Mechelen (DSCF0816).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de Saint-Lazare face à la naïade pendant la grande procession de Tournai (DSCF8699).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Well captured... :-) --Cayambe 20:42, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brass band playing on Rue du Curé du Château during the great procession of Tournai (DSCF8626).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloche dans l'église Saint-Jacques de Tournai (DSCF8555).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But I would say „bell at the …“ -- Spurzem 19:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC) I changed the description, thank you! --Trougnouf 20:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloned Paardenvisser by William Sweetlove (DSCF9667).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly leaning in, please fix. --Basotxerri 09:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)  fixed thank you! --Trougnouf 20:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC) Good quality. --MB-one 17:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginkgo biloba in Tournai (DSCF8790).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 15:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Atomium during civil twilight (DSCF1135).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 09:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Église Sainte-Catherine, Brussels (DSCF1164).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasteel van Mesen, Lede (DSCF0372).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syed07 15:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Section of Menin Gate's Hall of Memory (DSCF9497).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essex Farm Cemetery, Ypres (DSCF9509).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Ieperse gesneuvelden (DSCF9440).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perth Cemetery (China Wall) entrance (DSCF9405).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de Laeken (DSCF1248-DSCF1251).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Atomium's North face with a Smurf (DSCF1216).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brussels Expo, Palais 5 (DSCF1226).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument of Leopold I in Laeken park, Brussels (DSCF1232).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think this is probably sharp enough for QI, but if you can sharpen the top of the monument a bit, it will be more clearly a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 07:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)  Done, thank you! --Trougnouf 10:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)  Support - Sure. I'll call this a QI now. -- Ikan Kekek 11:33, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Searching for Utopia, Nieuwpoort (DSCF9856).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atomium sphere (DSCF1211).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Atomium's NW sphere (DSCF1210).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Last Post ceremony at the Menin Gate in Ypres (DSCF9452).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Markt, Veurne (DSCF9659-DSCF9664).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really beautiful, but could you sharpen the tops of the buildings a bit? -- Ikan Kekek 10:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC) thank you! I sharpened them a bit (along with everything but the sky), how is that? --Trougnouf 21:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC) I'm seeing halos on the upper reaches of the towers now. They were there before, but I'm noticing them now because the towers are sharper. Could you fix those? -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC) I will try but I'm not sure I will get to it during this nomination period as I'm very busy atm and it involves reprocessing all the steps (darktable->hugin->darktable->gimp). Thanks for the feedback :) --Trougnouf 18:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)  Done :) --Trougnouf 18:42, 14 November 2018 (UTC)  Support - Good quality now. Thanks for reworking it. -- Ikan Kekek 10:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Pélissiers de Binche à la grande procession de Tournai (DSCF8719).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Bartholomeuskerk, Pollinkhove (DSCF9534).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Villers and rubble (DSCF3170).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe some slight CAs on the window frames on the left. --Basotxerri 17:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)  fixed, thank you. --Trougnouf 18:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NIND CourtineDeVillersDebris ISO200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:19, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeons flying in front of a pink human (DSCF1939).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 14:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:NIND ursulines-red ISOH2.jpg

And also:

• File:NIND ursulines-red ISOH1.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-red ISO6400.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-red ISO4000.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-red ISO500.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-red ISO200.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-red ISO250.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-building ISOH1.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-building ISO6400.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-building ISO4000.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-building ISO1000.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-building ISO400.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-building ISO250.jpg
• File:NIND ursulines-building ISO200.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

* Happy Holidays 2019, Trougnouf! *

Joyeux Noël et tous mes vœux de bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019!

* Happy Holidays 2019, Trougnouf! *

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

			* Merry Christmas and all the best for 2019, Trougnouf! *
			Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом! Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком! ... :) Ermell (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you :)

Thank you Pierre André, Tournasol7, and Ermell! Merry Christmas and happy holidays to you too :) I look forward to your many pretty pictures to come. --Trougnouf (talk) 16:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria della Salute at night, Venice (DSC 0197).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. ----Horst J. Meuter 21:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlaggen by Arie Berkulin in Eindhoven (DSC 0284).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beginning of Grande Randonnée en Haute Ardennes, BE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 13:14 24.December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Virelles (frozen), Chimay (DSC 0251).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image. The sharpness is limit, but the file has a large size. So QI to me. --Cayambe 10:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doronicum orientale in Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia (DSC 0439).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)