Open main menu

Commons:Löschprüfung

(Redirected from Commons:Wiederherstellungswünsche)
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 100% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎svenska • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎پښتو • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

Hier kannst Du die Wiederherstellung gelöschter Seiten oder Dateien beantragen. Andere Nutzer können die Anfrage kommentieren, das heißt es findet eine zweite Diskussion über die Löschung statt.

Diese Seite gehört nicht zu Wikipedia. Diese Seite behandelt Inhalte von Wikimedia Commons, einem Archiv für freie Mediendateien, die von Wikipedia und anderen Wikimedia-Projekten verwendet werden. Wikimedia Commons nimmt keine Enzyklopädie-Artikel auf. Zur Beantragung der Wiederherstellung eines Artikels oder anderer Inhalte der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia-Ausgabe siehe die Löschprüfungs-Seite dieses Projekts.

Löschen (Löschrichtlinien)


Contents

Finde heraus, weshalb eine Datei gelöscht wurde

Schaue dir zuerst das Löschlogbuch an und finde heraus, warum die Datei gelöscht wurde. Verwende auch die Funktion Links auf diese Seite um zu sehen, ob die gelöschte Datei in Diskussionen verlinkt wurde. Wenn du selbst die Datei hochgeladen hast, findest du in der Regel auf deiner Benutzerdiskussionsseite Informationen, die die Löschung erklären. Lies bitte auch die Löschrichtlinien, die Richtlinien zum Projektumfang, und die Lizenzregel, um herauszufinden, warum die Datei möglicherweise nicht für Commons geeignet ist.

Wenn die Begründung nicht klar ist oder du sie in Zweifel ziehst, kannst du den löschenden Administrator kontaktieren und ihn um eine Erklärung bitten oder ihm Argumente liefern, die gegen eine Löschung sprechen. Bei Verständigungsproblemen kann dir auch ein Administrator helfen, der deine Muttersprache spricht. Sofern dieses Vorgehen nicht zu einer Wiederherstellung führt, kannst du hier den Wiederherstellungswunsch der Community zur Prüfung vorlegen.

Eine Löschprüfung beantragen

Löschungen, die den Richtlinien zu Löschungen, dem Projektrahmen und zur Lizensierung entsprechen, werden nicht rückgängig gemacht. Vorschläge zur Änderung von Richtlinien können auf deren jeweiligen Diskussionsseiten gemacht werden.

Wenn du glaubst, dass die betreffende Datei weder eine Urheberrechtsverletzung darstellt noch sich außerhalb des Projektumfangs befindet:

  • Sollte Dir der Grund für die Löschung nach Lesen der Diskussion nicht klar sein, kontaktiere den löschenden Administrator und bitte ihn, Dir die Argumente für seine Entscheidung nochmals darzulegen.
  • Wenn du niemanden direkt ansprechen möchtest, der zuständige Administratur die Wiederherstellung abgelehnt hat oder wenn du weiteren Benutzern die Gelegenheit geben möchtest, an der Diskussion teilzunehmen, kannst du die Wiederherstellung auf dieser Seite hier beantragen.
  • Wenn die Datei gelöscht wurde, weil eine Genehmigung des Urhebers fehlte, folge bitte der Anleitung zum Liefern einer Genehmigung des Urhebers. Wenn du dies bereits getan hast, gibt es keinen Grund mehr, hier eine Löschprüfung zu beantragen. Sofern die eingesendete Genehmigung in Ordnung ist, wird die Datei nach einer entsprechenden Prüfung wieder hergestellt. Bitte gedulde dich jedoch, da dieser Vorgang mehrere Wochen in Anspruch nehmen kann. Die Dauer hängt dabei von der jeweiligen Auslastung unserer freiwilligen Helfer ab.

Befristete Wiederherstellung

Dateilöschungen können befristet rückgängig gemacht werden, um entweder eine Löschprüfung zu unterstützen, oder um die Übertragung der Datei zu einem Projekt zu ermöglichen, das Fair use unterstützt. Verwende dafür den Baustein {{Request temporary undeletion}} in der entsprechenden Diskussion und liefere eine Erklärung dazu.

  1. Falls die befristete Wiederherstellung zur Diskussion um die Löschprüfung beitragen soll, erkläre, warum es für diese Diskussion hilfreich wäre, die Löschung zeitweilig rückgängig zu machen,
  2. oder, falls die befristete Wiederherstellung dazu dienen soll, die Datei zu einem Fair-use-Projekt zu verschieben, gib bitte an, auf welchem Projekt du die Datei hochladen möchstest und stelle einen Link bereit, der auf die jeweilige Fair-use-Regelung des Projekts zeigt.

Unterstützung bei Diskussion zur Löschprüfung

Dateien können zeitweilig wieder hergestellt werden, um bei der Diskussion zur Löschprüfung Klarheit zu schaffen, falls es für die Benutzer schwierig ist, zu entscheiden, ob eine Wiederherstellung gerechtfertigt ist, aber die Datei selbst nicht zugänglich ist. Sofern eine Beschreibung der Datei oder ein Zitat aus der Beschreibung auf der Dateiseite zur Entscheidungsfindung ausreichen, können die Administratoren stattdessen solche Beschreibungen bereitstellen, anstatt die Löschung befristet rückgängig zu machen. Anfragen zur befristeten Wiederherstellung dürfen abgelehnt werden, wenn der Eindruck entsteht, dass der Nutzen für die Löschprüfung hinter anderen, schwerwiegenderen Faktoren zurücksteht (z. B. die Wiederherstellung - auch zeitweilig - von Dateien, bei denen gravierende Bedenken hinsichtlich von Commons:Fotografien erkennbarer Personen bestehen). Dateien, die befristet wieder hergestellt wurden, um die Löschprüfung zu unterstützen, werden regulär nach 30 Tagen wieder gelöscht, oder wenn die Diskussion zur Löschprüfung geschlossen wird (je nachdem, was früher eintritt).

Zur Übertragung auf ein anderes Projekt

Anders als die englischsprachige Wikipedia und einige weitere Wikimedia-Projekte erlaubt Commons keine unfreien Inhalte, die sich auf Fair-use-Bedingungen beziehen. Wenn eine gelöschte Datei die Fair-use-Bedingungen eines anderen Wikimedia-Projektes erfüllt, dürfen Commons-Benutzer die befristete Wiederherstellung beantragen, um die Datei dorthin zu übertragen. Solche Anfragen werden im allgemeinen zügig ohne weitere Diskussion bearbeitet. Dateien, die zur Übertragung an andere Projekte wieder hergestellt wurden, werden nach zwei Tagen erneut gelöscht. Falls du eine solche Wiederherstellung beantragst, gib bitte an, zu welchem Projekt du die Datei übertragen möchtest, und verlinke die Fair-use-Bedingungen des jeweiligen Projekts.

Einen Antrag stellen

Stelle zuerst sicher, dass du versucht hast, herauszufinden, weshalb die Datei gelöscht wurde. Danach lies dir bitte die folgende Anleitung durch, wie der Antrag gestellt wird, bevor du weitermachst.

  • Gib einen passenden Betreff im Feld Subject: ein. Falls du die Wiederherstellung einer einzelnen Datei beantragen möchtest, ist es ratsam eine Überschrift nach dem Muster [[:File:GelöschteDatei.jpg]] zu verwenden (denk bitte an den Doppelpunkt ganz am Anfang des Links).
  • Gib die Datei(en) an, deren Löschprüfung du beantragen möchtest, und verlinke sie (siehe oben). Wenn du den genauen Dateinamen nicht weißt, liefere mach bitte so viele Angaben, wie möglich. Anfragen, die keine Informationen dazu enthalten, was eigentlich geprüft werden soll, dürfen ohne weitere Benachrichtigung geschlossen und archiviert werden.
  • Nenne den Grund/die Gründe für die beantragte Löschprüfung.
  • Unterschreibe den Antrag, indem du vier Tilde-Zeichen eingibst (~~~~). Falls du ein Benutzerkonto bei Commons hast, logge dich bitte ein, bevor du unterschreibst. Falls du die Datei ursprünglich selbst hochgeladen hattest, kann dies den Administratoren dabei helfen, sie zu identifizieren.

Füge den Antrag am Schluss der Seite hinzu. Klick hier, um die Seite zu öffnen, auf der du deinen Antrag stellen solltest. Wahlweise kannst du auch auf den Link "Bearbeiten" neben dem aktuellen Datum weiter unten klicken. Beobachte den Abschnitt mit deinem Antrag auf Änderungen und Ergänzungen.

Archiv

Abgeschlossene Löschprüfungen werden täglich archiviert.

Offene Anfragen

Watch View Edit

File:Participation Party.jpg

In some countries witch include Japan and South Korea, escheat copyright works became public domain. --Sharouser (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

If there is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is not implemented into our copyright templates, it should be discussed in COM:VPC before posting here. If it is already implemented, please point out appropriate template (or exact paragraph in the copyright law if you need help to find it; or court cases). The {{PD-textlogo}} rationale was rejected in the Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Pipenavis. Ankry (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Template:PD-South Korea contains escheat cases. (There are exceptional cases. Property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws upon the death of a copyright owner without heir or, in the case of a legal person or organization, upon its dissolution. )
Participation Party was merged into the Unified Progressive Party. After the dissolution of Unified Progressive Party by the Constitutional Court of Korea, All of property of UPP was transfered to South Korean government.
  • Political Parties Act of Korea, Article 48
    • The residual assets of a political party dissolved by a ruling for dissolution by the Constitutional Court, shall revert to the National Treasury.
  • In that case, copyrigts are become public domain by South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • Author's property rights shall expire in any of the following cases:
  • 1.Where, after the author's death without heir, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws
  • and
  • 2. Where, after the dissolution of a legal person or an organization who is the owner of author's property rights, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to the provisions of the Civil Law and others laws. 
There is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is implemented into our copyright templates. {{PD-South Korea}} --Sharouser (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:2018年台风玛利亚登陆前连江一户人家凉台花盆舞蹈.webm

And also:

Authorized mail has been sent long ago. However, the mail has not been confirmed. - I am Davidzdh. 07:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

  Question @Davidzdh: do you have ticket numbers? Did you tag the files {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.:Some people have not told me ticket numbers so that I only have these up to now:
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002114
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002098
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002892
  • Ticket#: 2018081310006494
  • Ticket#: 2018081210005988
  • Ticket#: 2017071410005022

- I am Davidzdh. 01:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

So can these files be recovered now?- I am Davidzdh. 08:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

If I need to do something to recover these files, please let me know and I will try my best. Thank you. - I am Davidzdh. 10:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Davidzdh: I   Support temporary restoration of File:2017夏福州三中滨海校区址环境.jpg, as Ticket:2017071410005022 is old enough. The rest are still too young.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: restored as requested. Ankry (talk) 08:44, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.:Is "too young" means there are some conditions I need to meet? If yes, what are the conditions? Thank you. - I am Davidzdh. 12:07, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Davidzdh: Other than waiting about 136 days from submission until they reach the head of the queue, no.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
I see. I wait for it. Thank you very much.- I am Davidzdh. 12:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
@Davidzdh: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wealden ostracod environments.jpg

I discovered that the file was deleted because somebody decided that it "These files look professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license." It looks professional because it is professional - I am a professional - and I am the copyright holder. I chose to make it freely available via Wikimedia Commons because I was asked to provide it (and several other figures) for a web page in support of a podcast that I recorded. As I indicated clearly in the text I supplied with it: This is an original diagram; a modified, black-and-white version of it was published as Text-fig. 12.3 in: Horne, D.J. 2011. Ostracods. In Batten, D.J. (ed.), English Wealden Fossils, 125–137. The Palaeontological Association, London, Field Guides to fossils 14, ix + 769 pp. It differs from the published version (to which the Palaeontological Association holds the copyright) in several aspects of layout and detail as well as the use of colour.

If I can get this image reinstated on Wikimedia Commons I will then go through the same procedure with others that were provided in support of the podcast but have since been deleted.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjhorne (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

  Info Nominated here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davidjhorne. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Another opinion? Yann (talk) 15:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
This is the kind of information that should have been presented in the original DR linked above.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Debian-M68K auf einem Atari Falcon.jpg

hallo - wie wäre es mit dem kontakt zum urheber des fotos, beispielsweise über seine mailadresse in der beschreibung..? falss das nicht möglich sein sollte, wüsste ich gerne, warum es nicht geht. danke. --StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 13:32, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Das hättest du bereits vor dem Upload machen sollen. Dann mach es jetzt: Commons:Email templates. --Túrelio (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wiki Speisezimmer Mahagoni Louis XVI 1980 Anton Spilker.jpg

Einverständniserklärung an permissions-de@wikimedia.org ohne Ticket# am 01.09.2018 von Anton Spilker GmbH & Co., Steinheim Anton Spilker GmbH & Co. i.L., Amtsgericht Paderborn HRA 2819

Eine Bestätigung von "Permissions - German Wikipedia" am 01.09.2018 mit [Ticket#2018090110002393] Ich beantrage eine Wiederherstellung! Urspilk (talk) 19:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose Die Warteschlange für die Bearbeitung solcher Emails liegt derzeit bei ca. 3 Monaten, weil alle diese Fälle von freiwilligen Helfern abgearbeitet werden. Sobald die Erklärung für gültig befunden wurde, wird das Bild aber wieder hergestellt. De728631 (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wiki Schlafzimmer Innenausbau Rokoko Schleiflack 1983 Trueggelmann.jpg

Einverständniserklärung an permissions-de@wikimedia.org ohne Ticket# am 04.09.2018 von Trüggelmann International Interiors Collection, Bielefeld Möbelwerk A. Trüggelmann GmbH ] Co. KG, HRA 11166 Bielefeld

Eine Bestätigung von "Permissions - German Wikipedia" am 04.09.2018 mit [Ticket#2018090110007669] Ich beantrage eine Wiederherstellung! Urspilk (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose Die Warteschlange für die Bearbeitung solcher Emails liegt derzeit bei ca. 3 Monaten, weil alle diese Fälle von freiwilligen Helfern abgearbeitet werden. Sobald die Erklärung für gültig befunden wurde, wird das Bild aber wieder hergestellt. De728631 (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Yoann Bourgeois par Géraldine Aresteanu.jpg

Hi I am requesting the undeletion of this file as I sent proof of authorization to use it freely from the author of the picture Geraldine Aresteanu I sent a written proof to OTRS so I would like to be able to publish again Yoann Bourgeois’ portrait as I am hired by him to keep his Wikipedia page up to date Thank you for your help 21/09/2018 MarievLaura (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)MarievLaura

  Comment @MarievLaura: Please note you must declare this paid contribution on your Wikipedia in French User page. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
@MarievLaura: Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 03:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
@Yann: It's probably Ticket:2018091810005573.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg

File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg

This image had 2 Public Domain references (one of them is Wikipedia!!!) containing the very same information buried in much text of the Free e-book by Google that Wiki is citing Corpus Reformatorum (details below), yet my original illustration with proper embedded and explicit references through Wikipedia itself (and presently on Wikipedia) was deleted evidently maliciously, diversely, and plurally, due to the fact that subsequently also in the article the "editors" deleted all references to Polish Sarmatian Astronomer Nicolas Copernicus which is a fact of history through a number of other references, which the "editors" also deliberately deleted (about half of my references of books or articles published in the last 500 years on Copernicus)!

The File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg that I have created, in fact specifically is cited in the Public Domain through Google e-books, and on Wikipedia, as and at Corpus Reformatorum:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Reformatorum The Corpus Reformatorum online CR 4 - 1837

Corpus reformatorum, Volume 4 C.A. Schwetschke, 1837

https://books.google.ca/books?vid=0Nk01EG-OTPT95Zn_Y2&id=QQ8RAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=%22corpus+reformatorum%22&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22corpus%20reformatorum%22&f=false


You need to scroll down to the cited page 679!

Which was stated in the deleted File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg ... “Page 679 of vol. IV of Corpus Reformatorum, containing a letter (of Oct. 16, 1541) from Philip Melanchton to a Mr. Burcard Mithobius, with first historic reference to "that Sarmatian astronomer who is trying to stop the sun and move the earth." ...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosetecscc (talk • contribs) 09:59, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


Rosetecscc (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

@Rosetecscc: Do you have evidence of such deletion?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:X-Ziliot.jpg

Soy Javier Alexis Castillo (X-Ziliot), administrador de la página de Facebook que tiene la foto que marcaron como violación de copyright: https://www.facebook.com/XZiliot/photos/a.250318051714570/1506352569444439/?type=1&theater

Esa foto fue tomada por mí, no tiene ningún tipo de copyright. Y el de la foto soy yo.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Shavi (talk • contribs) 08:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm Javier Alexis Castillo (X-Ziliot), administrator of the Facebook page that has the photo that they marked as a copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/XZiliot/photos/a.250318051714570/1506352569444439/?type= 1 & theater That picture was taken by me, it does not have any copyright. And the one in the photo is me.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:01, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

  Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michelle Ng Portrait.jpg

I have explicit permission from the author and subject of the photo to publish this photo.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jofanpang (talk • contribs) 10:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as having external source, no license, no permission. @Jofanpang: Please have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

  Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Curinga stemma.png

The file has been vectorized integrally and recreate by me starting from another image. The image in question is therefore a new creation and as such follows the criteria indicated by Commons for uploading files. Therefore if possible it is required to restore it in the light of what is written here. Thank you :)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Curinghese (talk • contribs) 13:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose as a copyvio per http://www.araldicacivica.it/stemmi/info/disclaimer/. Please have araldicacivica send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

  Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Shawn Andrews (actor).png was deleted because OTRS > 30 days

This file is still pending OTRS

Ticket#: 201808131000079

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Reriksenus (talk • contribs) 14:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

See here: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0028846/mediaviewer/rm2729343744 Reriksenus (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

  •   Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 136 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Photo of Charles P. Rettig.jpg

This photo and all rights belongs to us (Hochman Salkin Rettig Toscher & Perez, PC), not the NY Times or anyone else, and we posted it on the Wiki site re Mr. Rettig.

This photo and all rights associated with it belongs to us (Hochman Salkin Rettig Toscher & Perez, PC), not the NY Times or anyone else, and on September 22, 2018 we posted it on the Wiki site re Mr. Rettig.

The photo was taken in our office - by us, and posted on our firm site - by us, in April 2015. See https://www.taxlitigator.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/rettig.jpg.

This photo was not previously in the public domain in any manner until we first posted it on our firm site re Mr. Rettigs firm bio. The NY Times took it from Mr. Rettigs bio on our firm site -https://www.taxlitigator.com/our-firm/our-attorneys/charles-p-rettig/ - and first used it, with our permission, THREE YEARS LATER in 2018.

This photo and all rights associated with it belong to us - Hochman Salkin Rettig Toscher & Perez, PC and we posted it on the Wiki site re Mr. Rettig.

We would not prevent others from using the photo but it belongs to us, not anyone else, an we properly posted it on the Wiki site re Mr. Rettig. --MaraprI (talk) 16:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Thank you, we appreciate your consideration of the foregoing.

For images previously posted on the Internet, and because accounts here are essentially anonymous and photos are constantly uploaded without permission, we generally require that the copyright owner goes through the COM:OTRS process. That process confirms the ownership (sometimes the photographer does not transfer full ownership for example), and is clear about the rights being given. It is generally undeleted at the end of that process. Alternatively, the license could be specified at the source website. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

  Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ezio Auditore da Firenze screenshot for czech wikipedia.png

Hello, I'd request undeletion of mine screenshot from game Assassin's creed 2 by Ubisoft. This screenshot was created by their official tool and I really can't find any copyright violation init. Indeed, this tool was made for sharing this game's progress by players and many players made moovies of their gameplay for popularization with no strict copyright strikes... If you think it's impossible to undo deletion of this file, I understand, but stay living with all politeness in dark age and don't ask me anymore for any contribution on wikipedia, 'cause your rules of contributing are really not understandable. Best regards Solanum417lycopersicumq (talk) 19:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


  Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Катапульта (метательная машина Архимеда).png

This book «The Golden Rule», from authorship Ivanovsky, Mikhail Petrovich, became public domain in 1959*Эрик Артур Блер (talk) 23:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Paul Noonan 1.jpg

Permission form sent and pending. I sent this to you on the permission slip generator and am awaiting approval. I have full permission to use these images as released from the creator Foye Johnson. Please process and undelete. Regards, Hilwhite (talk) 08:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

  •   Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 136 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Files deleted by Yann

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Speedy Deletion Criteria clearly state "If a category is empty and is obviously unusable, unlikely to be ever meaningfully used, it may be speedily deleted."

In this case the categories relate to: 1) a physical, identifiable location 2) some of these locations are on heritage registers and could have photos uploaded from WLM 3) Railway stations are of general interest enough and identifiable enough that it is quite likely photos will be uploaded at some point 4) existed on wikidata and was correctly linked through

Thus I'd contend the criteria for speedy deletions has not been met as the categories are usable and able to meaningfully used going forward. Therefore the deletions should be reversed and edits on Wikidata also reverted.

It's quite time consuming to create categories on commons when a file is first uploaded and link through to wikidata properly. Thus if a category already exists and is linked properly and relates to something as obvious as a railway station I'd argue they should be left in place. This would seem to be supported by the wording of the current policy. Nickw25 (talk) 09:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

  • You’re right as rain, but good luck with that. My experience is that some admins swear by this holy rule and will delete any empty category on sight, regardless of any considerations. (Curiously, some of those admins wont even consider deleting galleries no matter how unmantained and shabby, because another hallowed proclamation states that galleries and categories should co-exist.) -- Tuválkin 10:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
  • If these are useful, i.e. not empty, then just recreate them. Otherwise, I don't see the point to have empty categories lying here forever... Regards, Yann (talk) 11:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Flohhaufn, Musikverein Pilgersdorf.jpg

and also

File:Frühlingskonzert 2018, Musikverein Pilgersdorf.jpg

File:Frühlingskonzert 2017, Musikverein Pilgersdorf 2.jpg

File:Frühlingskonzert 2017, Musikverein Pilgersdorf 1.jpg

File:Frühlingskonzert 2017, Musikverein Pilgersdorf, verkleidet.jpg

File:Musikheuriger 2017, Musikverein Pilgersdorf.jpg

File:Weihnachtskonzert 2017, Musikverein Pilgersdorf.jpg

File:Weihnachtskonzert 2015, Musikverein Pilgersdorf.jpg

File:MV Pilgersdorf Gruppenfoto 2018 V2 .jpg

File:MV Pilgersdorf Gruppenfoto 2018.JPG

For all these files was sent at 12. Apr. 2018 a permission mail to OTRS from the photographer. thx K@rl (talk) 13:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Karl Gruber: Ticket:2018041210012665 is currently 165 days old. Unfortunately, it is in the permissions-de queue, which currently has a backlog of 240 days.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Thx so we must wait. --regards K@rl (talk) 07:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Presse_quad.jpg

Im the owner of this picture. It was taken with my camera in my hometown Hildesheim on 07-01-2018. --Walpert (talk) 16:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

  •   Oppose The metadata says the copyright holder is Peter Brunnert. @Walpert: Please send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:FranciscoSalamone.jpg

All photographs taken of him are in the public domain because he died in 1959, more than 25 years ago (time for photographs in Argentina to enter the public domain). --Yilku1 (talk) 00:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  •   Support per COM:CRT#Argentina if it complies with {{PD-AR-Photo}}.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
  • The file in question appears to be a mobile phone photo and does not indicate where and when the original photo was first published as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}. In addition to 25 years since creation, it must be published at least 20 years ago. The uploader listed a date of 2016-06-05 (which was probably the date they took the photo with their mobile phone). Do you have any publication details for the original photo? —RP88 (talk) 01:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Swirl_Season_(2018_portrait).jpg

I am the Owner of the image Keshawnd5 (talk) 01:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Swirl Seasson 9/24/18

  •   Oppose as a copyvio. @Keshawnd5: Please have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:31, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Jeffrey Alan Scudder (Portrait).jpg

In regards to File:Jeffrey Alan Scudder (Portrait).jpg. -- the User:Jeffrey Scudder is the subject, and also the current copyright holder of this image. This user also sent out an image release email to OTRS. Can you please explain the nature of this deletion? This message represents our Commons:Unndeletion request. Thank you! Hexatekin (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

  •   Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 136 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I have sent out an image release email for this one, and definitely set the rights correctly from my end. Jeffrey Scudder (talk) 08:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:The Americans performing in Lawrence, KS on 2016-06-24, photo by Ann Dean.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The artist Ann Dean previously submitted a release for this photograph, and has now done so for a second time. Harshaw61 (talk) 02:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Cathay Serious.jpg undelete

The photo Cathay Serious.jpg was photographed and shred by my colleague. We both work for the the individual in the photo who is MP Cathay Wagantall. The photo is ours to share and we would like to share it with the rest of the wiki community. We kindly request that you undelete the photo.

Thank you, --KnowledegeWise27 (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC) Wyzdom McCalla-Rodol September 24th, 2018

@Jeff G. could you show the process for doing that? Or what that would look like? I am new to the wiki community and this is all a little much

— Preceding unsigned comment added by KnowledegeWise27 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
@KnowledegeWise27: Please click on the links OTRS and ping, read what you find there, and come back with any further questions.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Die_Kaldewei_Iconic_World_in_Ahlen.jpg

Christian Blanke who made this photo and sold it as press photo to Kaldewei (fotoblanke@gmail.com) wrote this mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org around 10:30 on 21th september:

I hereby affirm that I, Christian Blanke Fotografie, Christian Blanke, Nienkämpe 27, D-59269 Beckum, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work KALDEWEI ICONIC WORLD 01 as shown here: https://www.kaldewei.de/volltextsuche/?id=5&L=0&q=icinic+world and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Christian Blanke Fotografie, Christian Blanke, Nienkämpe 27, D-59269 Beckum Copryight Holder 21.09.2018

I would be grateful if you undelete this file and give the permission to have it in the article about KALDEWEI. Meera11 --Meera11 (talk) 10:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Kaldewei Architekten-Planer BIM-Dateien rgb.jpg

We would like to share the photo with the rest of the wiki community. We kindly request that you undelete the photo. Klaus Brünger (<klaus.bruenger@graphic-group.de>), who made this photo and sold it as press photo to Kaldewei wrote therefore the following mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org at 16:49 on 24th september:

> > I hereby affirm that I, Klaus Brünger, Graphic Group Mensch & Medien GmbH Otto-Brenner-Straße 203, 33604 Bielefeld the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work KALDEWEI ICONIC WORLD 01 as shown here: https://www.kaldewei.co.uk/fileadmin/_processed_/8/e/csm_1_Kaldewei_Architekten-Planer_BIM-Dateien_rgb_f19986a16d.jpg and > > have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. > I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] > I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the > > terms of the license and any other applicable laws. > I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. > I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the > > work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. > I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. > > Graphic Group Mensch & Medien GmbH, Klaus Brünger, Otto-Brenner-Straße 203, 33604 Bielefeld > > Copryight Holder >

> 21.09.2018

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Meera11 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Kaldewei_Architekten-Planer_BIM-Dateien_rgb.jpg

We would like to share the photo with the rest of the wiki community. We kindly request that you undelete the photo. Klaus Brünger (<klaus.bruenger@graphic-group.de>), who made this photo and sold it as press photo to Kaldewei wrote therefore the following mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org at 16:49 on 24th september:

> > I hereby affirm that I, Klaus Brünger, Graphic Group Mensch & Medien GmbH Otto-Brenner-Straße 203, 33604 Bielefeld the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work KALDEWEI ICONIC WORLD 01 as shown here: https://www.kaldewei.co.uk/fileadmin/_processed_/8/e/csm_1_Kaldewei_Architekten-Planer_BIM-Dateien_rgb_f19986a16d.jpg and > > have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. > I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] > I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the > > terms of the license and any other applicable laws. > I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. > I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the > > work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. > I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. > > Graphic Group Mensch & Medien GmbH, Klaus Brünger, Otto-Brenner-Straße 203, 33604 Bielefeld > > Copryight Holder > > 21.09.2018

Meera11 --Meera11 (talk) 10:43, 25 September 2018 (UTC)