Commons:Кандидате пентру имаджини ексчеленте

Дакэ консидери кэ ексистэ о фотографйе пе Коммонс суфичиент де атрактивэ ка сэ се афле пе паджина Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте, атунчи те ругэм инклуде-о ын листа де кандидате едитынд ачеастэ паджинэ. Дакэ ексистэ ун консенс дженерал дупэ 15 зиле, имаджинеа ва фи трансфератэ ла Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте.

Пропунери

Featured picture candidates

File:Зеленый долгоносик.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 19:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Curculionidae (Snout Beetles/Weevils)
Info Phyllobius maculicornis / Created by Alexander Klepnev - uploaded by Alexander Klepnev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary level of detail. The light is well handled in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Малый Семячик.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 18:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info Astratovolcano located in the eastern part of Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia / Created by Елена Верещака - uploaded by Елена Верещака - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dust spots virtually everywhere, should be fixed first. --A.Savin 23:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eurasian coot (60587).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 15:51:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
Info Eurasian coot (Fulica atra). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wolverine XI 22:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eastern amberwing (73102).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 15:43:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
Info Eastern amberwing (Perithemis tenera). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty good shot. Wolverine XI 03:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква светог Саве, Београд (Church of Saint Sava, 2023).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 11:25:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Serbia
Info Church of Saint Sava, Belgrade. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Please those who think buidlings shold be paralel to border skip my nomine...or show me the result. Adobe JPEG.
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Building and sky. Quite a long exposure for a drone picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 04:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fromelles le bunker de l'Abbiette IA59004858 (4).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 10:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Bunker called Teufelgraben, then of the Abbiette Fromelles Nord. It differs from other blockhouses by a casemated observatory added on its eastern flank.. Listed as a historic monument of France IA59004858. created by all by me --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André ^(talk) 10:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but when the subject doesn't have a large amount of inherent "wow" to it (IMO this does not), the photo/conditions need to be really great. The light is the biggest problem in this case. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination @Rhododendrites: Thanks for your advice, best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cebras comunes (Equus quagga), parque nacional de Tarangire, Tanzania, 2024-05-25, DD 90.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 08:09:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info Couple of plains zebras (Equus quagga), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating intertwined lines, that evoke me Victor Vasarely's painting Zebras (1937) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 13:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed and exposed, sharp. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 16:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NASA astronaut Leland D. Melvin with his dogs Jake and Scout.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 07:23:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info created by NASA - uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 07:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is the second nomination of this picture that features a new upload (higher resolution and sharper). Here is the first nomination.
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 07:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice quality, impressive, and high EV -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Unique, which excuses (for me) the technical shortcomings. The image has its own stand-alone importance given its virality a few years ago, which gives it some extra oomph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:42, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Zzzs (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Woof… I mean, wow! ★ 18:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:León (Panthera leo), parque nacional Serengueti, Tanzania, 2024-05-27, DD 08.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 21:51:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info Female Lion (Panthera leo) resting on a tree in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sorry Poco but the focus is on the tail. And this tail is not particularly exciting :-) The head is clearly out of focus. Animal fleeing is also less appealing than an animal approaching. Do you have another version of the same photo session? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basile Morin: I've sharpened the head, an improvement, I agree. I do have other shots of this session, like this one but in fact I enjoy the pose here and the empty background very much. It did not actually flee, if moved around. Poco a poco (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other one is a better candidate in my view. Although the lion is not fleeing, we can't really guess what it's doing and this picture showing a view from behind gives this impression -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, ok, thank for your feedback, let's see what other reviewers mean between both versions Poco a poco (talk) 11:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not really bothered by the fact that the head is not entirely in focus (it's sharp enough in my opinion), but there's no "wow" to me, maybe because the lion looks like he's fleeing. --Benji 16:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dragonblood tree in Socotra 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 20:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales
Info Dracaena cinnabari or the Dragonblood tree of Socotra in the Dixam plateau. Created and uploaded by Alex38 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Alex38 EXIF is missing. --Mile (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added, thanks a lot for your support ! Alex38 (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well exposed, great colors with the rusty branches, green "leaves" and the deep blue of the sky. The image also depicts the unique terrain that the dragonblood tree has adapted to growing in. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Maybe a little underexposed in the foreground, but I like being able to look around and see these strange trees dot the landscape at full resolution. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking Henrysz (talk) 16:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree that the foreground is a little underexposed, but overall I think the lighting is handled well. I do think a +10 to shadows would help this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lauren Bacall by Bernard Gotfryd.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:50:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
Comment 1970-1979 section doesn't exist yet, but it is time to create it. Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For portrait photographs after from 1970 or later, please use Portraits or Black and White portraits.

★ 17:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we could have sections in Historical up to 2000. Yann (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can add a change suggestion. ★ 22:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great Portrait. --Harald Krichel (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! Not the most difficult restoration - some dust, but not ridiculous amounts, but I think a valuable one. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Harald Krichel. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support C.S.I --Wilfredor (talk) 02:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:069 Waterbuck at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:28:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clean composition, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well exposed, composed, sharp detail - this image documents the species extremely well. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bird sex - Two copulating ducks showing a corkscrew penis inserted in a cloaca in Don Det Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 01:27:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
Info Educational, in my opinion. Luckily, male and female sexual organs are both visible. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sex tape released :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The main downside is the heads of both animals are out of focus. The visible reproductive organs mostly make up for the downside IMO. Now to scrub this off of my search history... --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. Aperture F/10 and time 1 /250 s is the maximum combination I could get here, and only 100 mm focal length. Going closer would have scared the birds. Focus was of course intentional -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I have told people about the corkscrew fallus, this image offers proof. As I understand it, the mallard's has barbs on it. It not a pretty picture, so to speak, but it documents something rarely observed, and the image brings into clear and sharp detail the evolution of a duck's fallus. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, having browsed through the categories, I noticed we have incredibly few images of this type, and even fewer quality images. I totally agree this one will never make a poster for a living room :-) But it's also original and perhaps more educational than a bunch of solitary ducks walking or swimming on a pond. Thank you very much -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Interesting and good documentation but I don't believe this is one of our finest images (in terms of subject, ligthing, detail, compo), sorry, Basile, Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aire-sur-la-Lys - Maison du gouverneur en2018 (2).JPG

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 21:20:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info Formerly the 17th century Governor's Hotel, the Maison du gouverneur is listed as a historic monument of France. Aire-sur-la-Lys, Pas-de-Calais, France. created by all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 21:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Pierre André ^(talk) 21:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light and nothing exeptional here. Just a picture of an old building with the good perspective. VI/QI, not FP. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs This building is listed as a historical monument of France, in the urban and landscape architectural heritage protection zone. It is listed in the Mérimée database, a database on French architectural heritage from the Ministry of Culture, under the reference PA00107940. best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 10:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, I can see overprocessing on the cornice of the building. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
* I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advice. --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neuschwanstein Castle 2024-02.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 15:50:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info I know there are several FP of this castle, but this one offers more detail and higher resolution. It’s not necessarily better, just different, and none of the others are from this time of year. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree, you found a good point of view and the resolution/quality is very high. -- Terragio67 (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azurite - Echinops ritro - 6 - par Mickael Schauli.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 11:49:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales
Info created by Le Commissaire - uploaded by Le Commissaire - nominated by Mickaël en résidence -- Mickaël en résidence (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mickaël en résidence (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good focus, pleasing aesthetic, and the bees are abuzzing. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fields Mountain Chah Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00671.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 05:25:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Chah, a small village nestled at the base of a barren mountain range in Zanskar in the Indian Himalayas. Population 465 (2011), elevation 3,920 m (12,860 ft). The large extent of newly-sown green fields in this arid high-altitude semi-desert is a tribute to the ingenuity and perseverance of the farmers. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination, and the viewpoint is appreciable -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 02:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC) but why f/18?[reply]

File:MonumentoInsurgentesSilesia-KatowicePoland-edit.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 23:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by Gustaw Zemła - photographed/uploaded/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unexceptional light and composition, in my opinion. Dull sky and bland colors. The building in the background and the video camera in the foreground are not really beautiful. Also not convinced this is the best angle for this sculpture, compared to other photos on the internet. Contrast artwork / trees of the same color not working, sorry. Technically there is chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped videocamera on foreground and improve lightning Ezarateesteban 17:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tried to photograph this monument a couple times during Wikimania, too, and found it surprisingly difficult (light, but also background/composition). I didn't wind up uploading any of them. Maybe better with a wide angle lens... — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riesenburg HDR-20180418-RM-163651.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 20:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info Riesenburg (Giants castle) Cave in Franconian Switzerland, Germany. Looking vertically upwards through the collapsed ceiling. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love this view. Wolverine XI 20:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This place scares me --Wilfredor (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great view, and looks good at small scale, but I find oversharpened trees unpleasant to look at at full resolution. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fisherman at Muzhappilangad Beach.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 17:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info A fisherman at Muzhappilangad beach.

All by Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support POTY 2024 finalist. ★ 17:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Outstanding scene. But the sky shows colour banding and I am not happy with the fact that this nomination is giving no EXIF data about the camera used and is only provided at 9.8 megapixels. --August (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is fixed. Now please consider --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August, By considering your suggestions I have made some changes. Is it OK? --Shagil Kannur (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Thank you for editing! The image was improved slightly. It has some more detail and proper EXIF data now. But the colour banding is still visible in the form a pixelated parts at the sky. Additionally it is cropped intensively from 21 megapixels down to 11.6 megapixels. So all in all I really love the scene with its composition and light, but technicaly this image might have trouble even becoming Quality Image so I can sadly not consider it FP.

August (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Benji 16:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne de Clèves - Hans Holbein le Jeune - Musée du Louvre Peintures INV 1348 ; MR 756 - version 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 08:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by Hans Holbein the Younger, uploaded by Shonagon, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning reproduction of an excellent portrait painting representative for its time. I have never seen Holbein’s the Younger brushwork in such detail. – Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high quality for a 6400 ISO. – Terragio67 (talk) 19:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grandmother preparing food inside traditional kitchen (edited).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 15:16:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Nepali grandmother preparing food in a traditional kitchen. Created by Mithun Kunwar, edited and uploaded by Radomianin, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The original photograph was one of my personal favourites from Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 – it feels so authentic and is aesthetically very appealing because of the contrasts between light and dark and between warm and cold colours. But the original file was a bit noisy and oversaturated. Radomianin has generously created this edited version which greatly reduces the noise and also tones down the saturation a bit. (Yes, the reds are still very saturated, but IMHO realistic when we consider the combination of the vivid red paint on the wall with the warm light from the fire.) Therefore I am happy to nominate this edited version. – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great atmospheric image, thank you for your careful editing, Radomianin! --Kritzolina (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive composition and color scheme; thanks for the nomination, Aristeas. When compared to the original, the difference in saturation is obvious. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Very striking environment with fantastic candle lights. Appealing composition (like this one by the same author) with living subject, and excellent quality considering the low light intensity. 6 second shot, wow! Warm and beautiful -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work. Looks better if the top cropped a little imo. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 19:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Evocative colours. Remarkable clarity for a 6 sec exposure. --Tagooty (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nothing much to say. Wolverine XI 15:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 04:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zicht op de spoorbrug vanuit het verlengde van het spoor, Bestanddeelnr 657 (cropped).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 14:23:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info The Culemborg rail bridge in 1868, just after being completed. It was the longest of its kind in that era. This photo from the inner side features a great perspective, a modern-looking atmosphere, yet the people in the middle reminds us that is still full XIX century | Photo from the National Archives of the Netherlands, originally uploaded by Mr.Nostalgic - cropped and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 16:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historically valuable and an eye-catching composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 19:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good use of perspective. --Tagooty (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medina of Fes, Marocco.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 13:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Medina of Fes (= old, enwalled town of Fes), Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too busy, nothing stands out. A possible VI candidate. --Tagooty (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:55, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open front door over Wat Mixay and praying bhikkhus, Vientiane, Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 06:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the image, the composition, exposure and the glorious gold colors juxtaposed with the red. I think the "wow" factor exceeds the complications of the long exposure. Some of the monk's heads show motion blur, and one is transparent. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. As many pictures were taken that day on a tripod, I could improve this effect with another frame. Side note: the image notes (gadget) should be placed on the nomination page, not on the file page, per Commons:Image annotations#Examples of inappropriate and not-informative notes. Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I didn't realize that I ended up on the wrong page with that. Its a great shot! Glad you had another frame. The depth, the color, its like peering into a secret world. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I also like the slight asymmetry created by the door leaves opening to different widths and by the gathered curtains. Somehow they makes the image livelier and more exciting – it is not a static view, but we we seem to get an unexpected view into the life of the monks. – Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas; quite an image --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's still one head with significant motion blur, but overall this is excellent. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Chris Woodrich.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deelerwoud, 09-05-2024 (actm.) 04.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 04:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
Info Deelerwoud, (the eastern part.) Split birch (probably due to lightning strike) on a heathland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Split trees have always fascinated people, as legends and fairy tales show; this photo documents a striking specimen, and in good time (the tree is likely to crumble soon). The restrained light and the muted colours round off the picture with a fitting mood. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your vote and your additional information.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Aristeas. --Kritzolina (talk) 16:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ooligan (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 18:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool image. The stark beauty of the split tree over the heath. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:27, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support In death, there is beauty. --Zzzs (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depends who's at work :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Striking ⚡️ :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Betulaceae

File:Estornino soberbio (Lamprotornis superbus), parque nacional Serengueti, Tanzania, 2024-05-26, DD 66.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 06:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sturnidae_(Starlings)
Info Superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but the back of the bird isn't in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The eye is in focus, as usually required; the upper back is very sharp with fine feather details and the claw is sharp, too. – If possible, I would consider enlarging the crop a little bit, espec. at the left (lead room). – Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and I definitely agree, there is lots of detail here Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Now the image looks even more balanced. – Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful plumage, unfortunately the light is not excellent, and the contrast between the head and the background of the same color is not very successful. Bird in shadow and globally the dark shape in front of a dark tree considerably reduces the wow factor, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination This time I cannot agree with the feedbacks abouve but this is going nowhere anymore Poco a poco (talk) 08:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Why? I will be happy to move to {{Abstain}} if my review is not helpful. One of the goal of FPC is to get constructive feedbacks.

And more importantly, I would be very VERY interested in learning where my review is wrong -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say your review is wrong, I said I disagree. I respect your assessment, as you, hopefully, respect mine. Poco a poco (talk) 08:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, then. Thanks for this clarification. Same case as here (current nomination), to give a comparison. Although the sculpture is IMO more problematic, basically it suffers from a similar (subjective) problem. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 08:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Blue Fly-By.png

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 02:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Crop on left could be more wider for some px. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I took your advice and went back to the original and re-cropped it and uploaded a new version. I think I may have done this wrong. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's disconcerting to merge the background with the silhouette of the bird, it's not something we should be electing. Although the dynamics of the flight is perfectly conveyed, but the quality of the photo is not very good. JukoFF (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Just trying to understand what you mean -- are you saying there's not enough separation between the bird and the background? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail. Very sharp for a bird frozen in flight. Difficult shot. Impressive aerodynamic position at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per JukoFF. --August (talk) 08:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per JukoFF. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me Poco a poco (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terreirão1.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:52:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
Info created and uploaded by Lebobito - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice sunset image but IMHO not sufficiently impressive or unique enough to be FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:41:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 00:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fontaine Trevi - Rome.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 10:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really appreciate the straightforward composition and the atmosphere created by the lighting. However, the absence of any direct light results in a very low contrast between the foreground and the building. Just a touch of direct light on the water fountains would have helped to create separation and add depth. Additionally, I find the tightly cropped building on the far left somewhat distracting. --August (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version

Info Thanks to @Augustgeyler: for the review, I found it valid, and IMHO this version is better. I removed the building cut and I add more contrast --Wilfredor (talk) 21:30, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good also. Yann (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vulcan prefers this alt version.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Prefer ALT — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:59, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version 2

Info I apologize for pinging so many people, but I'm pinging those who have previously voted because I consider this version superior, the people capture the real atmosphere of the place. In addition to a distortion-free front view. @Yann, UnpetitproleX, JukoFF, El Golli Mohamed, Agnes Monkelbaan, MZaplotnik, SHB2000, Augustgeyler, VulcanSphere, George Chernilevsky, and Crisco 1492: --Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 03:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this version --Wilfredor (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GLIB Feeding Young.png

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 19:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are no FP's of this species. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is nowhere near FP-level. I suggest you withdraw this nomination. Wolverine XI 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Constructive criticism will assist me in nominating high quality images and in capturing better photographs. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has been six days since you stated you would provide more information about your objection to this photo as an FP. You haven't provided any specific concerns about the image, but your statement in opposition is very strongly stated. Your opposition is currently the only one for this nomination. If you are unwilling to elaborate, could you please withdraw your opposition? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I strongly disagree. --Zzzs (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. I'll forgive you. However, I'll suggest to include a reason in your oppose votes so the author can use thr criticism to fix the image. Thanks in advance! Zzzs (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks tilted, otherwise fine to me. More information about the location would be good, too. Poco a poco (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting capture, really good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Talking about quality, it is very good. For FP - background failed you here, black on black, i can see upper part of bird since its covered. At least some white middle-bellow helped. Also, i hope you wont use 100+ MB for each photo, its around 24 MPx, do we loose so much on jpeg !? --Mile (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you are saying. I did shoot at f/4 (Prime lens at 500mm without TC) to focus on the eyes and face of the adult ibis and the exchange of food. As for the PNG, I did a quick check and it seems like I'm the only dork using it. I use PNG for lossless compression, preservation of image quality and colors. Wikipedia's suggestion is JPG, so moving forward I will post JPGs. But my previously uploaded images, already uploaded, may appear on FPC as .PNG.

Thank you for your thoughtful and considerate feedback. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, now leave as PNG, if you put jpeg over it will take another space so OK now. I will actually remove minus, to neutral. Checked again. --Mile (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handling serpents at the Pentecostal Church of God. (Kentucky) by Russell Lee. - NARA - 541335.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 17:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Little bit of an odd image for here: I'd say it's oddly composed but very compelling. Passed En-wiki FPC easily, but Commons evaluates things differently. Vote as you see fit; I shan't take offense, but I would appreciate explanations, because, y'know, there's other images to consider, and having a good idea on how Commons stands helps with pre-filtering them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive illustration of Pentecostal faith/superstition (depending on your own point of view). – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For those not in the US, yes, this is actually a thing. In the early 19th century we were not as church-going as we are these days. Charismatic priests traveled from the cities to rural areas and started a variety of high-energy, exciting sects/movements. Those in turn gave way to another "awakening" that began to incorporate things like speaking in tongues, drinking poison, fire walking, faith healing, and yes, handling venomous snakes. It's dangerous garbage that actually hurts people. Worth a feature for good documentation, even if I'd rather it show one of the snake bites -- or the people in the audience with mangled hands and missing body parts (or missing family members). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 20:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BNR HQ 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 14:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created by Rangan Datta Wiki - uploaded by Rangan Datta Wiki - nominated by Rangan Datta Wiki -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably the best possible view of this impressive 1906/1907 building (for some details, see e.g. this article). I like the contrast between the ambitious Indo Saracenic building and the modern Kolkata in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But the file name could be better and the description is very poor of the --Llez (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The building is nice, but it's partially obscured behind the trees. The level of detail and the lighting are not good Poco a poco (talk) 11:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clingmans Dome Road in snow 06 April 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 06:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States (this gallery has sections for states, but there is currently none for the state in which this image was taken: North Carolina)
Info created by AHeneen - uploaded by AHeneen - nominated by AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as creator & nominator. There is a lot of detail in this image, but when viewed at 100% zoom, the sharpness should be OK. In my browser, the "original image" link on its page defaults to a much higher zoom (200%???) in which the sharpness of the trees is not the greatest. The rock face on the left foreground is naturally wet year-round and had a trickle of running water behind a layer of ice, which is why some of the ice against the rock face is dark while icicles hanging close to the rock face are bright from the sunlight shining through them. Image was taken in Nikon RAW format and only editing adjustments were to increase both highlight and shadow protection, increase overall brightness just a little, increase saturation just a little, and change white balance from "auto" to "natural light auto". -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Really good composition. The sharpness could be better (f/8?) and a touch of CAs. --XRay 💬 11:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, light, and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Very good composition. But I think it is over-sharpened. Is this intentional? --August (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on your camera settings and your software when editing. Sharpening can be applied in both stages. August (talk) 22:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral A tad oversharpened. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavily over-sharpened. --August (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty but not outstanding, it is also overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unexceptional, sorry. Just a normal road in my view. Something special is missing, like a horse or colorful flowers -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]