निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 11:25:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Црква светог Саве, Београд (Church of Saint Sava, 2023).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Црква светог Саве, Београд (Church of Saint Sava, 2023).jpg
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 10:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Fromelles le bunker de l'Abbiette IA59004858 (4).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fromelles le bunker de l'Abbiette IA59004858 (4).jpg
Oppose Sorry, but when the subject doesn't have a large amount of inherent "wow" to it (IMO this does not), the photo/conditions need to be really great. The light is the biggest problem in this case. — Rhododendritestalk | 15:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 07:23:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:NASA astronaut Leland D. Melvin with his dogs Jake and Scout.jpg/2Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NASA astronaut Leland D. Melvin with his dogs Jake and Scout.jpg/2
Support - Unique, which excuses (for me) the technical shortcomings. The image has its own stand-alone importance given its virality a few years ago, which gives it some extra oomph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sorry Poco but the focus is on the tail. And this tail is not particularly exciting :-) The head is clearly out of focus. Animal fleeing is also less appealing than an animal approaching. Do you have another version of the same photo session? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Basile Morin: I've sharpened the head, an improvement, I agree. I do have other shots of this session, like this one but in fact I enjoy the pose here and the empty background very much. It did not actually flee, if moved around. Poco a poco (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The other one is a better candidate in my view. Although the lion is not fleeing, we can't really guess what it's doing and this picture showing a view from behind gives this impression -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not really bothered by the fact that the head is not entirely in focus (it's sharp enough in my opinion), but there's no "wow" to me, maybe because the lion looks like he's fleeing. --Benji16:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Dracaena cinnabari or the Dragonblood tree of Socotra in the Dixam plateau. Created and uploaded by Alex38 - nominated by ★ -- ★20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well exposed, great colors with the rusty branches, green "leaves" and the deep blue of the sky. The image also depicts the unique terrain that the dragonblood tree has adapted to growing in. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Maybe a little underexposed in the foreground, but I like being able to look around and see these strange trees dot the landscape at full resolution. — Rhododendritestalk | 15:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree that the foreground is a little underexposed, but overall I think the lighting is handled well. I do think a +10 to shadows would help this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:28:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:069 Waterbuck at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:069 Waterbuck at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 01:27:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bird sex - Two copulating ducks showing a corkscrew penis inserted in a cloaca in Don Det Laos.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bird sex - Two copulating ducks showing a corkscrew penis inserted in a cloaca in Don Det Laos.jpg
Weak support The main downside is the heads of both animals are out of focus. The visible reproductive organs mostly make up for the downside IMO. Now to scrub this off of my search history... --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your review. Aperture F/10 and time 1 /250 s is the maximum combination I could get here, and only 100 mm focal length. Going closer would have scared the birds. Focus was of course intentional -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have told people about the corkscrew fallus, this image offers proof. As I understand it, the mallard's has barbs on it. It not a pretty picture, so to speak, but it documents something rarely observed, and the image brings into clear and sharp detail the evolution of a duck's fallus. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, having browsed through the categories, I noticed we have incredibly few images of this type, and even fewer quality images. I totally agree this one will never make a poster for a living room :-) But it's also original and perhaps more educational than a bunch of solitary ducks walking or swimming on a pond. Thank you very much -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting and good documentation but I don't believe this is one of our finest images (in terms of subject, ligthing, detail, compo), sorry, Basile, Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2024 at 21:20:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Aire-sur-la-Lys - Maison du gouverneur en2018 (2).JPGCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aire-sur-la-Lys - Maison du gouverneur en2018 (2).JPG
@Sebring12Hrs This building is listed as a historical monument of France, in the urban and landscape architectural heritage protection zone. It is listed in the Mérimée database, a database on French architectural heritage from the Ministry of Culture, under the reference PA00107940. best regards Pierre André (talk)10:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info I know there are several FP of this castle, but this one offers more detail and higher resolution. It’s not necessarily better, just different, and none of the others are from this time of year. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
InfoChah, a small village nestled at the base of a barren mountain range in Zanskar in the Indian Himalayas. Population 465 (2011), elevation 3,920 m (12,860 ft). The large extent of newly-sown green fields in this arid high-altitude semi-desert is a tribute to the ingenuity and perseverance of the farmers. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 23:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:MonumentoInsurgentesSilesia-KatowicePoland-edit.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:MonumentoInsurgentesSilesia-KatowicePoland-edit.jpg
Oppose Unexceptional light and composition, in my opinion. Dull sky and bland colors. The building in the background and the video camera in the foreground are not really beautiful. Also not convinced this is the best angle for this sculpture, compared to other photos on the internet. Contrast artwork / trees of the same color not working, sorry. Technically there is chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I tried to photograph this monument a couple times during Wikimania, too, and found it surprisingly difficult (light, but also background/composition). I didn't wind up uploading any of them. Maybe better with a wide angle lens... — Rhododendritestalk | 16:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Riesenburg (Giants castle) Cave in Franconian Switzerland, Germany. Looking vertically upwards through the collapsed ceiling. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Outstanding scene. But the sky shows colour banding and I am not happy with the fact that this nomination is giving no EXIF data about the camera used and is only provided at 9.8 megapixels. --August (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Thank you for editing! The image was improved slightly. It has some more detail and proper EXIF data now. But the colour banding is still visible in the form a pixelated parts at the sky. Additionally it is cropped intensively from 21 megapixels down to 11.6 megapixels. So all in all I really love the scene with its composition and light, but technicaly this image might have trouble even becoming Quality Image so I can sadly not consider it FP.
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2024 at 08:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Anne de Clèves - Hans Holbein le Jeune - Musée du Louvre Peintures INV 1348 ; MR 756 - version 2.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anne de Clèves - Hans Holbein le Jeune - Musée du Louvre Peintures INV 1348 ; MR 756 - version 2.jpg
Support Stunning reproduction of an excellent portrait painting representative for its time. I have never seen Holbein’s the Younger brushwork in such detail. – Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The original photograph was one of my personal favourites from Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 – it feels so authentic and is aesthetically very appealing because of the contrasts between light and dark and between warm and cold colours. But the original file was a bit noisy and oversaturated. Radomianin has generously created this edited version which greatly reduces the noise and also tones down the saturation a bit. (Yes, the reds are still very saturated, but IMHO realistic when we consider the combination of the vivid red paint on the wall with the warm light from the fire.) Therefore I am happy to nominate this edited version. – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive composition and color scheme; thanks for the nomination, Aristeas. When compared to the original, the difference in saturation is obvious. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Very striking environment with fantastic candle lights. Appealing composition (like this one by the same author) with living subject, and excellent quality considering the low light intensity. 6 second shot, wow! Warm and beautiful -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 14:23:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de spoorbrug vanuit het verlengde van het spoor, Bestanddeelnr 657 (cropped).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de spoorbrug vanuit het verlengde van het spoor, Bestanddeelnr 657 (cropped).jpg
Info The Culemborg rail bridge in 1868, just after being completed. It was the longest of its kind in that era. This photo from the inner side features a great perspective, a modern-looking atmosphere, yet the people in the middle reminds us that is still full XIX century | Photo from the National Archives of the Netherlands, originally uploaded by Mr.Nostalgic - cropped and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 06:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Open front door over Wat Mixay and praying bhikkhus, Vientiane, Laos.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Open front door over Wat Mixay and praying bhikkhus, Vientiane, Laos.jpg
Support I like the image, the composition, exposure and the glorious gold colors juxtaposed with the red. I think the "wow" factor exceeds the complications of the long exposure. Some of the monk's heads show motion blur, and one is transparent. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I didn't realize that I ended up on the wrong page with that. Its a great shot! Glad you had another frame. The depth, the color, its like peering into a secret world. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also like the slight asymmetry created by the door leaves opening to different widths and by the gathered curtains. Somehow they makes the image livelier and more exciting – it is not a static view, but we we seem to get an unexpected view into the life of the monks. – Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Split trees have always fascinated people, as legends and fairy tales show; this photo documents a striking specimen, and in good time (the tree is likely to crumble soon). The restrained light and the muted colours round off the picture with a fitting mood. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The eye is in focus, as usually required; the upper back is very sharp with fine feather details and the claw is sharp, too. – If possible, I would consider enlarging the crop a little bit, espec. at the left (lead room). – Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful plumage, unfortunately the light is not excellent, and the contrast between the head and the background of the same color is not very successful. Bird in shadow and globally the dark shape in front of a dark tree considerably reduces the wow factor, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, then. Thanks for this clarification. Same case as here (current nomination), to give a comparison. Although the sculpture is IMO more problematic, basically it suffers from a similar (subjective) problem. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's disconcerting to merge the background with the silhouette of the bird, it's not something we should be electing. Although the dynamics of the flight is perfectly conveyed, but the quality of the photo is not very good. JukoFF (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:41:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpg
Oppose I really appreciate the straightforward composition and the atmosphere created by the lighting. However, the absence of any direct light results in a very low contrast between the foreground and the building. Just a touch of direct light on the water fountains would have helped to create separation and add depth. Additionally, I find the tightly cropped building on the far left somewhat distracting. --August (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It has been six days since you stated you would provide more information about your objection to this photo as an FP. You haven't provided any specific concerns about the image, but your statement in opposition is very strongly stated. Your opposition is currently the only one for this nomination. If you are unwilling to elaborate, could you please withdraw your opposition? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. WolverineXI18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. I'll forgive you. However, I'll suggest to include a reason in your oppose votes so the author can use thr criticism to fix the image. Thanks in advance! Zzzs (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Talking about quality, it is very good. For FP - background failed you here, black on black, i can see upper part of bird since its covered. At least some white middle-bellow helped. Also, i hope you wont use 100+ MB for each photo, its around 24 MPx, do we loose so much on jpeg !? --Mile (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you are saying. I did shoot at f/4 (Prime lens at 500mm without TC) to focus on the eyes and face of the adult ibis and the exchange of food. As for the PNG, I did a quick check and it seems like I'm the only dork using it. I use PNG for lossless compression, preservation of image quality and colors. Wikipedia's suggestion is JPG, so moving forward I will post JPGs. But my previously uploaded images, already uploaded, may appear on FPC as .PNG.
Yes, now leave as PNG, if you put jpeg over it will take another space so OK now. I will actually remove minus, to neutral. Checked again. --Mile (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 17:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Handling serpents at the Pentecostal Church of God. (Kentucky) by Russell Lee. - NARA - 541335.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Handling serpents at the Pentecostal Church of God. (Kentucky) by Russell Lee. - NARA - 541335.jpg
Comment Little bit of an odd image for here: I'd say it's oddly composed but very compelling. Passed En-wiki FPC easily, but Commons evaluates things differently. Vote as you see fit; I shan't take offense, but I would appreciate explanations, because, y'know, there's other images to consider, and having a good idea on how Commons stands helps with pre-filtering them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For those not in the US, yes, this is actually a thing. In the early 19th century we were not as church-going as we are these days. Charismatic priests traveled from the cities to rural areas and started a variety of high-energy, exciting sects/movements. Those in turn gave way to another "awakening" that began to incorporate things like speaking in tongues, drinking poison, fire walking, faith healing, and yes, handling venomous snakes. It's dangerous garbage that actually hurts people. Worth a feature for good documentation, even if I'd rather it show one of the snake bites -- or the people in the audience with mangled hands and missing body parts (or missing family members). — Rhododendritestalk | 16:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably the best possible view of this impressive 1906/1907 building (for some details, see e.g. this article). I like the contrast between the ambitious Indo Saracenic building and the modern Kolkata in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 06:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Clingmans Dome Road in snow 06 April 2024 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clingmans Dome Road in snow 06 April 2024 01.jpg
Support as creator & nominator. There is a lot of detail in this image, but when viewed at 100% zoom, the sharpness should be OK. In my browser, the "original image" link on its page defaults to a much higher zoom (200%???) in which the sharpness of the trees is not the greatest. The rock face on the left foreground is naturally wet year-round and had a trickle of running water behind a layer of ice, which is why some of the ice against the rock face is dark while icicles hanging close to the rock face are bright from the sunlight shining through them. Image was taken in Nikon RAW format and only editing adjustments were to increase both highlight and shadow protection, increase overall brightness just a little, increase saturation just a little, and change white balance from "auto" to "natural light auto". -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
सीधे वर्तमान उम्मीदवार पर पहुँचें।
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_90.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_08.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_04.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_66.jpg)
_(2).jpg)
_by_Russell_Lee._-_NARA_-_541335.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_90.jpg){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_08.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_66.jpg,_not_featured){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Russell_Lee._-_NARA_-_541335.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_90.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_90.jpg){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_08.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_08.jpg){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_05.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
_04.jpg,_featured){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_66.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_66.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_by_Russell_Lee._-_NARA_-_541335.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_by_Russell_Lee._-_NARA_-_541335.jpg){kind=link}
