AlexanderKlink

Elephant eye

Hi Alexander. Very impressive picture. I use the same hardware, BTW (Alpha700 with 2.8 Minolta Macro). I posted a noise reduced crop. what do you think? Lycaon (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Hans. Thanks for the crop, I like it (although I also like the fact that in my version the eye is more centered, too, but the blue sky is a bit distracting, too). And from the preliminary status, it looks like it might become my first FP, so: yay! :-)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
w:Bethmännchen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good enough, geocoding is unnecessary. --Mr. Mario (talk) 00:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Cartesian_Theater.svg

I'm a bit worried about this delist and replace nom - there are major perspective failures int he rendering of the frying pan in the SVG - I think we should insist they be fixed first. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora Edulis Closed Fruit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done studio shot. --J.smith 20:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephas Maximus Trunk Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a little bit of noise in the out of focus areas, but I don't think it detracts from the subject of the picture. This is an excellent image. I would recommend setting your ISO to 200 or 400, if the conditions permit. --J.smith 20:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dipsacus laciniatus L.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets the requirements IMHO. --Leyo 19:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Spitze

Hallo Alexander, bin über den Rüssel eines Asiatischen Elefanten in der deutschen WP auf Deine Seite gekommen. Ganz großes Kompliment für Deine Fotos, hier macht das Stöbern so richtig Spaß! Viele Grüße, --3268zauber (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Thomas_Gsella.jpg

File:Thomas_Gsella.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AlexanderKlink (talk) 10:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		I hereby award at you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_I.jpg

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_I.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Iconoclast (talk) 14:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_II.jpg

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_II.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Iconoclast (talk) 14:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Jovibarba Hirta Botanical Garden Zagreb.jpg

Dear Alexander,

Your picture File:Jovibarba Hirta Botanical Garden Zagreb.jpg is misidentified. It is obviously not a Jovibarba hirta, but a taxon of the family Aizoaceae, possibbly a species of the genus Lampranthus.

I have put it in the category Unidentified Aizoaceae.

Best botanical regards, --Réginald (To reply) 10:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:Black Mac

Hello Alexander, I really do not know if it seems with the new mac, I'll try to contact Apple to verify. On the site he was environment, the license was valid, so I took the good faith and believed the author. I was not really check. For now, it is best to leave the way it is, because some of the icons are used in other projects, can be big changes for nothing. Ok? Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, not for lack of will, but did not find any site related directly with Apple to produce the icons, I found only sites like this http://www.icondrawer.com/free.php. Besides the logo from iTunes, for example, is far from original. And if you see, is to download for Mac, who'd get the same icons?

On site there is no such limitation, the license is optional, there are things without a license. If you want, feel free to speak with the author, I try to speak with Apple on Monday, during business hours. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 00:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Galanthus Ikariae Palmengarten Frankfurt.jpg

Dear Alexander,

I have redirected this picture to Category:Galanthus woronowii. Galanthus ikariae subsp. latifolius is an obsolete name for Galanthus woronowii, a snowdrop from Turkey.

The true Galanthus ikariae from some Greek islands is a less hardy species, which is infrequently cultivated. It has a larger green apical spot on the inner tepals and darker unfolded leaves.

Best botanic regards, --Réginald (To reply) 19:13, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_II.jpg

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_I.jpg

File:Umbrella_Sculpture_Thessaloniki_George_Zongolopoulos_I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 14:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

[Pretty awesome picture]

Nice composition. Morning sunlight, thinking of the location, I guess? Ingolfson (talk) 06:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RSA SecurID SID800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dan Bernstein 27C3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --H005 20:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meredith L Patterson 27C3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --H005 20:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Len Sassaman 27C3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good (altough DOF could have been better). --H005 20:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harald Welte 27C3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, although the left part has too much shadows. --H005 17:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter Welchering 27C3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much shadows again, but nonetheless good, excellent sharpness. --H005 17:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image details

Why people are silent about the QI cakes? I can see some troubles. 1) Noisy shadows. 2) Blown out lights in the foreground. 3) Low DOF, and this is possible in the background, but distractiong in foreground.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Charlie Miller Infiltrate 2012.jpg Licht-Setting?

Hallo Alexander! Ich habe das o.a. auf QIC gerade promoted. Meine Frage: Wie genau hast du das Licht gesetzt, die Ausleuchtung ist, wie ich finde, sehr gelungen. Es sieht so aus als hättest du von oben links einen Schirm platziert und den Hintergrund beleuchtet. Weil der Nasenschatten allerdings sehr weich ist, vermute ich, dass du von rechts noch zusätzlich aufgehellt hast (Reflektor?). Ich freue mich über eine Rückmeldung. Danke, --Tuxyso (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
P.S.: Vielleicht könntest du bei dem Bild noch die grünen CAs entfernen, sollte ja schnell gemacht sein.

• Danke für die Blumen und für's promoten. AFAIR war da einfach noch 'ne Wand auf der rechten Seite (Konferenzraum), so typisches Strobist-Corner-Portrait halt. Mit CA entfernen habe ich leider gar keine Erfahrung, wenn Du Lust hast und es hilft kann ich Dir gerne das RAW zukommen lassen ... --AlexanderKlink (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Danke für die Info. Was für einen Lichtformer hast du denn von links benutzt? Einen Schirm? Ein offenbar sehr minimalistisches Lichtsetting mit einem sehr guten Effekt wie ich finde - ganz nach Strobisten-Manier :) Der Hintergrund war gar nicht zusätzlich beleuchtet?
    CAs entfernen ist kein Hexenwerk. Womit bearbeitest du die Fotos denn? In Lightroom ist das ein Haken "Chroamatische Abberationen entfernen" und evtl. zwei Stärke-Einstellungen am Regler. Du kannst mir das RAW natürlich gerne zukommen lassen, dann schaue ich mir das mal an: MeinNickName@gmail.com --Tuxyso (talk) 20:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Ja, das war ein Schirm von oben links, und ja, der Hintergrund war auch angeblitzt. "Ich habe gar keine Lightroom", RAW schick ich Dir bei Gelegenheit mal zu, muss ich erstmal raussuchen. --AlexanderKlink (talk) 20:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Rubber Duck.jpg

Yours sincerely, ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Rubber Duck.jpg

File:Rubber Duck.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

New user template

Hello.

I've created a new template to describe yourself : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2

I've use it on my user page.

Regards. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Earth 2016! Dear AlexanderKlink, On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the Spanish edition of Wiki Loves Earth 2016, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Due to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered thousands of pictures of natural heritage sites from 17 countries. The contest in other countries is still open. You can find all your uploaded pictures in this category, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Wiki Loves Monuments and Wiki Loves Folk are just around the corner. If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. English speaking Commons community meets in the Village Pump. You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Earth team

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo AlexanderKlink,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

Hallo AlexanderKlink,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

File:Tokyo Shibuya Shaun the Sheep Statue.jpg

File:Tokyo Shibuya Shaun the Sheep Statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo AlexanderKlink,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Wiki Loves Earth Spain 2018 has started!

---

Dear AlexanderKlink, As every year, Wiki Loves Earth in Spain, an international photographic contest about natural heritage sites in the Spanish territory, started on May 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2018 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again to document biodiversity. If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. You can review the rules of the contest in it official site (Spanish). We look forward to your free images! We take also the opportunity to invite you to Wiki Loves 2017 awards ceremony, which will take place on June 16th at 17:00 in the Medialab-Prado auditorium, in Madrid. Open entry until filled to capacity. Sincerely, The team of the Wiki Loves Earth edition in Spain

--Rubén Ojeda (WMES) (talk) 08:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Fritz Fischer (2012).jpg

File:Fritz Fischer (2012).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AmericanAgent (talk) 10:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 ya ha comenzado!

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España, nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 acaba de empezar. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre. Además, este año organizamos el concurso de fotografía en colaboración con Wikimedia Portugal, por lo tanto también puedes subir imágenes del país vecino.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactar con nuestro coordinador de programas: Rubén Ojeda (WMES).

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2019 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --19:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hakodate Switch Tower Sign.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

¡Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España ya ha comenzado!

¡Hola! Nos alegra anunciar que Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar la naturaleza de España y mostrarla al mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos. Por favor, consulta primero las bases del concurso en su página oficial. En ella también puedes conocer cómo participar. Si tienes alguna pregunta, sugerencia o comentario, por favor, no dudes en ponerte en contacto con nosotros.

Gracias,
el comité organizador de Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España - 09:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Estás recibiendo este mensaje porque ya participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores.

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado!

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactarnos.

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2022 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --03:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namibia Otjiwarongo Cheetah Conservation Fund Cheetah Hunting Toy Lure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namibia Otjiwarongo Cheetah Conservation Fund Cheetah Sitting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 20:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DE Bickenbach Landbachauen Rotes Höhenvieh Portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Kallerna 00:36, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DE Neunkircher Höhe Radarturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 11:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RU Irkutsk Taltsy Spasskya Tower Ilimsk Ostrog.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hakodate Switch Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hakodate Magistrates Office Building May 2016 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hakodate Goryōkaku Park Sakura May 2016 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Graciosa Montaña Clara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namibia Cheetah Feeding1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namibia Kalahari Desert Termite Mound.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namibia Cheetah Feeding5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add some more categories. --Ermell 09:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)  Done --Drow male 06:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Thank you --Ermell 20:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romania Putna Monastery Hay Bale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldberg Snowy Fir Tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 22:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kühkopf-Knoblochsaue Lacerta Agilis 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamb Balkhausen Germany 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Safe Surrender Site San Francisco Fire Station14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 08:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wairoa Old Portland Lighthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romania Mănăstirea Sfântul Mina din Roșiori View of Moldova River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mahout with young elephant.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 15:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Pwnie Award flickr RobotSkirts.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Pwnie Award flickr RobotSkirts.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)