User talk:Gryllida/Archive
2010
editWelcome
edit
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
edit- Image:Solar Road Palel 350.org.png was uncategorized on 28 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Categories added. Thanks Gryllida (talk) 12:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
File:FrenchSpirderman.jpg [deleted as copyvio]
editA file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:FrenchSpirderman.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. –Tryphon☂ 11:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Noncommercial, I see. Thanks Gryllida (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Uploaded FrenchSpiderMan HongKong.jpg instead. Gryllida (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
2011
editFile:Telstra.svg [deleted as copyvio]
editMarked as possible copyright violation.--gildemax (talk) 17:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and text. See the licensing tags in the Permissions section. Gryllida 20:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
2012
editFile:Ralph_Merkle.png uncategorized [categories added]
edit- Image:Ralph Merkle.png was uncategorized on 26 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Added. Thank you. Gryllida 03:42, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Windows 8 preview menu.jpg [deleted as copyvio]
editMarked as possible copyright violation. Linfocito B ~ Greetings from Colombia. 01:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
File:FrenchSpiderMan HongKong.jpg [deleted as copyvio]
editMarked as possible copyright violation. - Zil (d) 15:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Red Bull Stratos - freefall 36.jpg [deleted by my request]
editMarked as possible copyright violation. El Grafo (talk) 09:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- I requested speedy deletion (author request). Thanks. Gryllida 12:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
File:DuckDuckGo office.jpg and others [done]
editDuckDuckGo images [deleted by my request]
editHi Gryllida, what do you mean by "email request with permission"? Did they send you the image by email including a permission? If yes, then you need to forward this permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Or did you take these images from somewhere else and asked for permission a posteriori? If yes, you need to add {{OTRS pending}} to each image site. --Túrelio (talk) 22:09, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Done Thanks Túrelio, The copyright holder indicated that the images must be licensed under BY-NC-ND; the images are gone... Gryllida (talk) 10:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Singapore rhododendron images [OTRS verified]
editSAme problem with File:Singapore rhododendron with carpenter bee 2.jpg, File:Singapore rhododendron with weaver ant 2.jpg, File:Singapore rhododendron with carpenter bee 1.jpg and File:Singapore rhododendron with weaver ant 1.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- This is now done too. --Gryllida (talk) 23:37, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Could you please clarify whether I get notified when someone reads the mail and approves the upload? Thanks. --Gryllida (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- We have received the emails, but are asking for further information. --Rschen7754 04:12, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have requested the additional information from the images copyright holder and will be notifying you when I get a reply. Gryllida (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Done Got a reply. The OTRS people verified. All done! --Gryllida (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
2013
edit[Done] Samsung-galaxy-tab.jpg has non-free screen photo; deleted
edit(Redacted) «Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. ... Please remember to respond.» Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 10:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
- You have asked me to participate in the discussion at the deletion entry. I have done so. The concept is new to me and I have learned it. Gryllida 09:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. Welcome to contribute further images. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
[Done] Ipad on united airlines.jpg has non-free screen photo; deleted
edit(Redacted) «File:Ipad on united airlines.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. ... Please remember to respond.» Jcb (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is something I already know, but did not know at the time of the upload. I got the image deleted by author request. Gryllida 21:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
[Done] Autopatrol given
edit(Expanded) Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. whym (talk) 02:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. I appreciate your attention to this detail. Thank you. Gryllida (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
2014
edit[Done] Залесский Сергиевский мост.png missing license; added
editRedacted No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Already fixed; the detect thingie appears to have missed the license. Where do I report it? —Gryllida 01:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
[Done] Move tab at wikipedia.png missing license; added
editRedacted File has missing license information, use {{PD-self}} instead of {{PD}} if it's your own work. Cwbm (commons) (talk) 21:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- It is. I just did. Unfortunately the upload wizard didn't take me to a preview of the file page (I had typed {{Pd}} manually in the license box, I think, as that's easier than to choose from a long list). —Gryllida 01:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
[???] BRUCE LAWSON OPERA.png otrs pending
editRedacted The File:BRUCE LAWSON OPERA.png which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. JuTa 10:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Gryllida 23:58, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, can you please ask again on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. I'm not a member of the commons support team an cannot see those mails. regards --JuTa 07:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Gryllida 08:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Then please talk to User:Jcb who deleted the file the same day I marked it as {{Nopd}}. regards --JuTa 08:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Actually the {{Nopd}} was not needed. The another 15 days is nowhere in the procedure. Files can be deleted as soon as they have been marked as OTRS received for more than 30 days and there is still no valid permission. But as soon as I am absent for a few weeks, this nopd bot somehow starts interfering with the normal procedure. Jcb (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Acknowledged. Thank you; hopefully the wording is fixed as necessary. (I'm still in the process of reaching the relevant people for this image). Gryllida 08:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there. I am a member of the response team. As soon as the email is sent, please email me personally the email address the permission was sent from. I will try and then get it sorted ASAP. --Mdann52talk to me! 23:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- 2014010610004877; I reckon this is not enough. You or an OTRS agent should follow-up by e-mail, confirming or rejecting the question I raised in my message today: I expect a rejection. (I refrain from providing any detail on this public medium, as all our correspondence was private.) Gryllida 09:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC) Please see
- Hi there. I am a member of the response team. As soon as the email is sent, please email me personally the email address the permission was sent from. I will try and then get it sorted ASAP. --Mdann52talk to me! 23:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Acknowledged. Thank you; hopefully the wording is fixed as necessary. (I'm still in the process of reaching the relevant people for this image). Gryllida 08:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Actually the {{Nopd}} was not needed. The another 15 days is nowhere in the procedure. Files can be deleted as soon as they have been marked as OTRS received for more than 30 days and there is still no valid permission. But as soon as I am absent for a few weeks, this nopd bot somehow starts interfering with the normal procedure. Jcb (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
I don't need you to. I agree that 30 days had passed by 8 March 2014 with no permission mail received. However, you told me I would have another 15 days to get the message delivered. - Then please talk to User:Jcb who deleted the file the same day I marked it as {{Nopd}}. regards --JuTa 08:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Gryllida 08:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Can I have the 15 days please? The author was on vacation at the time of upload, and while he did tell me that the license is ok, he couldn't send you the verbose confirmation as required (and I don't have any idea how I could have feasibly learned the deadline). - Hi, can you please ask again on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. I'm not a member of the commons support team an cannot see those mails. regards --JuTa 07:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
[Done] DDG Pref link.png license missing; added
editRedacted No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Jarekt: That's right, typo... I keep enjoying the software that doesn't take me to the file page after I upload it. How do I turn off the UploadWizard to gain a habit of looking what I uploaded, and upload one by one? Gryllida 09:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
[Done] MetadataPanelUnfoldButton.png source information missing; added
editHello!
Please update the source information for th photograph which is shown in your screenshot. Thanks in advance! Cheers, High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi High Contrast, I did a few minutes after uploading I think -- it should be in the image description now.. Gryllida 09:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- No, it still links to File:Bruant à gorge blanche.jpg. You should link the train image, please. --High Contrast (talk) 18:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks, that's a mistake; should be corrected now. Gryllida 09:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
[Done] Catching you here; broken RSS irc bot; fixed
editMay i re-invite you in #wikinews-de ? There are complains about broken RSS. --Itu (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- I came back to this issue this week and it appeared to be working properly. Gryllida 22:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
[Done] Voting with Snickers.jpg photo of a non-free work of art; no derivative permission; deleted
edit{{tl|Autotranslate|2=File:Voting with Snickers.jpg|base=Idw}} Josve05a (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted per COM:DW. OK. Gryllida 03:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
2015
edit[???] Re: Ice Cold Gold photos; otrs pending
editIn response to your e-mail regarding this deletion review:
The red-linked files on the deletion request(s) are photos which were linked to Discovery Channel/Animal Planet photos and sites.
- EXIF data copyright to Discovery Communications
- File:ICG1.jpg Animal Planet
- File:Jackduggins.jpg Copyright to Animal Planet
- File:Chad Watkins.jpg From Discovery Channel and Ezra Wolfinger (the photographer for this photo)
The uploader has since re-uploaded File:ICG1.jpg as File:1234GL.jpg with the same claim of own work. This is a new user who has not engaged in any dialogue regarding the deleted files or the ones at deletion review.
The person or company who owns the copyright will need to send permission to Commons:OTRS before the photos can be used here. We hope (talk) 13:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, yeah. I had asked them to do so. Gryllida 22:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
[Done] Snow in Europe 2.jpg otrs permission missing; deleted
edit{{Autotranslate|1=File:Snow in Europe 2.jpg|base=Image permission}} Smooth_O (talk) 11:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- OTRS permission missing
2016
edit[Done] Ipad mini.jpg non-free screen photo; deleted
edit{{Autotranslate|1=File:Ipad mini.jpg|2=|3=|base=Idw}} –Totie (talk) 04:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- "Derivative work of copyright-protected software (wallpaper and icons)" as quoted here -- thanks. Gryllida 06:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
[Done] 2014donationscreen 1.png screenshot not used at major wikis; not restored
edit{{Autotranslate|1=File:2014donationscreen 1.png|2=|3=|base=Idw}} Thatonewikiguy (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Gryllida 06:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Seemingly deprecated by a next version with a different name. Gryllida (chat) 00:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. The discussion linked is archived so I ask here. I do not use the file on other wikis but it is under a free licence and I would like to add categories. Kindly please restore the file. --
[Done] 2014donationscreen.png nominated for deletion; not deleted
edit{{Autotranslate|1=File:2014donationscreen.png|2=|3=|base=Idw}} Thatonewikiguy (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Quoting Basvb here, "good categorisation, no issues". --Gryllida 06:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
2017
edit[???] File tagging File:Jill Saward 080627b.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jill Saward 080627b.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jill Saward 080627b.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jarekt (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I searched OTRS for permissions but could not find any for this image. Could you provide the ticket id which should have come with confirmation email? --Jarekt (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- How do I find this file usage at other wikis? --Gryllida (chat) 00:30, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
[Done] Your VFC installation method is deprecated
editHello Gryllida, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Could you please remind me what VFC is? Gryllida (chat) 22:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- COM:VFC, Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. Commented it out (a while ago). --Gryllida (chat) 00:29, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- COM:VFC, Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
2018
edit[Done] File:2018-03-18 sydney temperatures report.png: deleted at author's request (new version uploaded with a different name)
edit{{Autotranslate|1=File:2018-03-18 sydney temperatures report.png|2=|3=|base=Idw}} Pierre cb (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- (I've edited your comment so that it does not appear as bulky: added nowiki tags around it. It effectively meant "Hi, your file has been Nominated for deletion.".)
- I, the uploader, am requesting speedy deletion of this recently created (<7 days) unused content. (Superseded by File:2018.03.18 Sydney-t.png, File:2018.03.18 Sydney-rh.png.) --Gryllida (talk) 23:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
[Done] Deleted File:Solar Road Palel 350.org.png as non-free
edit
File:Solar Road Palel 350.org.png
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 18:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for leaving a message that is not in a big orange box.
- What was that image? I don't recall anything about it by its name.
- May I please have a copy of the image and its metadata by email to possibly recall and investigate in the case I can get its licensing fixed? Gryllida (chat) 00:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- And why don't you start by looking at the log? Sealle (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, nice, thank you Sealle. I did not know I can look here.
- It is not used at other wikis, correct? --Gryllida (chat) 04:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- And why don't you start by looking at the log? Sealle (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Polling graphs
editThe data points are imported from the polling tables at the Wikipedia article en:Next Australian federal election. --Canley (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- OK thanks Canley. Gryllida (chat) 10:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
Здравствуйте. я не могу прочитать ваш месседж - он показывает только первую строчку. и я нигде не могу открыть его и прочитать полностью, а так же ответить вам. JuKa (talk) 10:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC) |
- No worries, Jurita Kalite. Followed up at your talk page. --Gryllida (chat) 20:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
2019
edit[Done] knitting machine image nominated for deletion; kept as it is from pixabay
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 14:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- I don't follow the deletion rationale here. You say "There are all sourced to a third party domain that takes images from "free" image sites and uploads them to their site so people have to donate to use them. While some of these images are possibly licensed properly without the original URL we can't know for sure." Is pixabay not a good image source URL? Does it ask anyone to pay to view the images as it was free for me previously...? --Gryllida (chat) 18:47, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- It wasn't originally sourced to Pixabay. It is all fixed now. Please disregard. Sorry for the trouble. --Majora (talk) 19:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
OK, thanks, I think you mean this diff made after the nomination for deletion. --Gryllida (chat) 22:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
|
File:First fkng fireman DT (46702296285).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
HyperGaruda (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
test
edit+
[Deleted] Notification of possible deletion ("Raid step*.jpg")
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Raid step 7.jpg
- File:Raid step 6.jpg
- File:Raid step 5.jpg
- File:Raid v4.jpg
- File:Raid1 v4.jpg
- File:Raid1 v3.jpg
- File:Raid1 installer.jpg
- File:Debian raid hp microserver n54l.jpg
Yours sincerely, Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Responded at the entry page. --Gryllida (chat) 09:44, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
2021
edit(Deleted) Copyright status: File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0820.jpg
editCopyright status: File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0820.jpg {{File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0820.jpg}} And also:
- File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0819.jpg
- File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0818.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 03:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Update: deleted as author failed to provide clearer permission. --Gryllida (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
(Deleted) Copyright status: File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0821.jpg
editCopyright status: File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0821.jpg {{File:May 31 AFL England crash near Randwick, NSW, AU - IMG 0821.jpg}} This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) 04:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Update: deleted as author failed to provide clearer licensing permission. --Gryllida (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks Gryllida, for your tireless efforts to improve Wikimedia Commons! Red-back spider (talk) 07:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC) |
{{File:New Windsor Bridge on the Hawkesbury River.jpg}} Ytoyoda (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
(Added 'tl' to the original message to remove the noisy bioletplate. Discussion in the next section. --Gryllida (talk) 00:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC))
(Deleted) File:Australia Sydney flood photo.jpg
edit{{File:Australia Sydney flood photo.jpg}} Ytoyoda (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed I had 'bad user' error in Flick2Commons, and uploaded it by hand. Where can I read the blacklist information to know more specifically what the user was blacklisted for? Gryllida (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- There’s a list at COM:QFI but I don’t think it’s complete. Though I’m familiar with this user — they upload other people’s photographs to Flickr and assign free licenses (Flickrwashing, basically). There’s a discussion about them at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/02#Flickr user Ninian Reid Ytoyoda (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Does Flickr remove such copyright violations when reported there? Gryllida (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think they do. They might have changed, but back when I asked a few years back, the copyright owner has to contact Flickr, so even very blatant copyvio ends up staying there. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Does Flickr remove such copyright violations when reported there? Gryllida (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- There’s a list at COM:QFI but I don’t think it’s complete. Though I’m familiar with this user — they upload other people’s photographs to Flickr and assign free licenses (Flickrwashing, basically). There’s a discussion about them at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/02#Flickr user Ninian Reid Ytoyoda (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
(Resolved) Copyright status: File:Australia - satellite imagery on Wednesday March 24, 2021.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Australia - satellite imagery on Wednesday March 24, 2021.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Australia - satellite imagery on Wednesday March 24, 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:March 18th - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
- File:March 19th - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
- File:March 21st - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
- File:March 20th - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
- File:March 22nd - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
- File:March 23rd - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
- File:River conditions in Australia on March 24, 2021.jpg
- File:March 24rd - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
- File:March 17th - rainfall for the day in Australia.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- These are all addressed. However, gry, please consider adding machine readable templates like {{Cc-by-3.0-au}}. This will make it easier to LR the files. Cheers!
Acagastya (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)- Thanks! Gryllida (talk) 03:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
(Resolved) Copyright status: File:UK 2021-03 Vaccinated vs antibodies positive COVID-19.png
editCopyright status: File:UK 2021-03 Vaccinated vs antibodies positive COVID-19.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:UK 2021-03 Vaccinated vs antibodies positive COVID-19.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Licence included without tag. Don't know which tag applies. Gryllida (talk) 02:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:NASA’s Ingenuity helicopter on April 4, 2021.jpg
editCopyright status: File:NASA’s Ingenuity helicopter on April 4, 2021.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:NASA’s Ingenuity helicopter on April 4, 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Australia - satellite imagery on Wednesday March 24, 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
廣九直通車 (talk) 03:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- kept per OTRS permission Gryllida (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Firebug load time of mediawiki.org.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:43, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- replied on the entry Gryllida (talk) 23:51, 1 September 2022 (UTC)