Wikimedia Commons

Itu

Joined 19 November 2007
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Itu in topic section heading added here
Learn more about this page
This user thinks categories are awful.
--> * Proposal for fast_tagging *


User:Russavia/userboxes/bullshit

Tools:

This is both wrong way! Cropping has to be handled just like scaling for use in articles

useful things:

  • {{subst:nsd}} (no/missing source, tagged by date)
  • {{subst:nld}} (no/incomplete licensing information, tagged by date)
  • {{subst:npd}} (no/missing permission, tagged by date)
  • {{subst:dw-nsd}} (derivative work, no/missing original source, tagged by date)


{{PD-ineligible}}
{{PD-Art|PD-old-100}}
{{PD-1923}}

{{PD-Canada}}







Ideas edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  • create ascii-filenames for every file, at least as Redir. Iron out Non-asciis in latin sequences. For non-ascii sequences, at least a hexcode(without %'s), maybe better a senseful, maybe automatic translation. Collisions treated with sequence appending.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Itu!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
  First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

  Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

  Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
  Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Cirt (talk) 13:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hi Cirt & thank you for your welcome  . Additional Thanks for that useful Info-Boxes, i hope i will find time to read. regards. --Itu (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago30 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Itu!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Dear CategorizationBot. Could you please check for the images when they became categorized and remove them or strike them out in the list above? :/ Be intelligent! --Itu (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Loveparade-zugang.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Loveparade-zugang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--rtc (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I've seen. --Itu (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:P1390390a.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

\o/ Whats that? There is no more content under this name and then there is a demand for license? The moved File does have sufficient licence info. --Itu (talk) 22:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Species Filenames - my Policy edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Maybe someone will read this:
My 'policy' regarding species is to use something like original filename(numbers) until there is a clear determination. Myself, i'm not an expert. Then, i personally would appreciate to keep the old filename (as the redirect) after renaming.
Beside of all that there really should be a bot that ASAP fixes all links after the renaming. --Itu (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC) edited --Itu (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 593d93fcdf9b5b154e859a1477f13c59 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Itu09.gif edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Itu09.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

– Adrignola talk 16:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

A bit late... --Itu (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Junge_Zeit_kritisiert_WP_Juni_2011.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Junge_Zeit_kritisiert_WP_Juni_2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 05:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Gaga-monster-ball-uk-speechless.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Itu, ja, ich hab es zu der Zeit am vollständigen Bild gesehen, aber jetzt ist die Lizenz dafür geändert worden und wir können das Bild nicht mehr hochladen - sich auf eine damalige Lizenz für ein Werk zu berufen, das so hier noch nicht hochgeladen war, von dem nur eine Ableitung legal existiert, und dem jetzt hinreichende Lizenzierung enzogen wurde, ist trotz des Nichtzurücknehmenkönnens problematisch. Wir haben es halt zu dem Zeitpunkt nicht getan, deshalb ist es jetzt zu spät. Beste Grüße Hekerui (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Location? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Itu - do you have a photo location for File:Delichon urbica by itu.jpg please? Danke! - MPF (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Middle-germany should be sufficient, i think. --Itu (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

May I ask… edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

…the reason for this edit ? Jean-Fred (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think a personality rights [warning] makes no sense for people who a very prominent (at least if they were not got naked in their own bathroom or something in that way). So, given one of the most popular,wellknown public people, this looked to me like pure nonsense. --Itu (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)edit:+'warning' --Itu (talk) 20:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Danke edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hierfür. --4028mdk09 (talk) 03:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Black-beaked-sea-bird-close-up.jpg edit

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wetten dass neu.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wetten dass neu.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wetten dass neu.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Polarlys (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Die Erlaubnis ist ja angegeben. Seit user:Mabdul vor einiger Zeit energisch alle Logos speziell von wikinews nach commons verschoben hat und scheinbar nicht auf Widerstand stiess, neige ich seinem Beispiel zu folgen. --Itu (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ja, ich "bewege" "einfache" und "copyrighted" Bilder/Logos nach Commons, aber nur wenn sie nur aus Text bestehen und/oder sie sehr einfach sind. Dieses Bild ist eindeutig nicht einfach, da es a) 3D-Effekte beinhaltet und b) Licht Effekte hat. Das rechtfertigt nicht, dass dieses Bild auf Commons ist. Siehe auch Commons:TOO. Gruß, mabdul 15:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Wetten dass neu.jpg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Wetten dass neu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Polarlys (talk) 23:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Twitter bird logo 2012.svg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Twitter bird logo 2012.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

So what? Not even simple Logos are allowed? --Itu (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Melek taus.png edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Melek taus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gumruch (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I ask for a 3rd opinion, or someone to explain edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

here Penyulap ☏ 22:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Upload gleicher Name edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Siehe bitte Commons:Forum#Upload_gleicher_Name - ich habe dasselbe Problem, und habe deshalb einen Bug auf Bugzilla gemeldet. --Slashme (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Danke. --Itu (talk) 21:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Können sie vielleicht für den Bug "wahlen"? Das kann man hier machen. Danke! --Slashme (talk) 15:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hm? Wie wählen? werden dort Stimmen gesammelt? Ich müsste dort wohl erst einen Account anlegen... --Itu (talk) 22:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agencia Brasil edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Done. Thanks for the advie =) --Wiki erudito (talk) 19:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, please do it for all the other pics similar! --Itu (talk) 20:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Uk.gif edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Uk.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Horst Arnold edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, ich würde o. g. Kategorie ernsthaft umbenennen, und zwar in (Englisch) Category:Judicial error about Horst Arnold. Einspruch? |FDMS (WP: en, de) 20:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hm, Begeisterung löst das erstmal nicht bei mir aus, ich halte auch die entsprechende Umbenennung des deWP-Artikels für Käse. Ausserhalb des deutschsprachigen Raums gibt es für den Fall auch nahezu keinerlei Rezeption. Und im Kern ist Category:Horst Arnold das sprachneutralste Label. Und damit sicher das Beste im moment. --Itu (talk) 21:10, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sprachneutral ja, aber auch falsch, da viele Bilder die Person gar nicht zeigen. Außerdem müssen Commons-Kategorien grundsätzlich immer Englisch sein, solange es den "Begriff" (damit ist wohl Justizirrtum gemeint) im Englischen gibt. Es muss nicht dieser besondere Vorschlag sein, allerdings dürfen wenn der Name aus der Person besteht (Klammerkategorie) dann auch nur Bilder, die die Person zeigen, in der Kategorie zu finden sein. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 21:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Bei einem Bild verwendest du in der Beschreibung case Horst Arnold, das wäre mir z. B. auch recht. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 21:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hm, wenn du denn meinst. Weiterleitungen sind wohl nicht vorgesehen für Kategorien!? --Itu (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Was meine ich denn nun – du hast die Wahl, Judicial error oder case? Ich glaube, dass Weiterleitungen sehr wohl möglich sind, muss mich dazu (vor der manuellen Umbenennung) aber noch informieren. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 21:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Template:Category redirect
'Judicial error about' wär grauslich. 'case' ist akzeptabel. --Itu (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Passt, mach ich, danke. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 22:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Und lassen wir den Redirect besser weg, es gibt ja noch mehr Horst Arnolds. --Itu (talk) 22:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Alles erledigt, {{Speedydelete}} muss nur noch bearbeitet werden. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 22:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Category:Case Horst Arnold

File:Blah blah.gif edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Itu. Hast du die durch deinen Edit erzeugte Fehlermeldung nicht gesehen? Bitte korrigiere dies. --Leyo 17:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Leyo. Ja, das habe ich gesehen. Es ist hier das Gleiche wie mit vielen anderen Edits von mir, die - notgedrungen - in der Regel gelb unterlegte Fehl-Meldungen hinterlassen. Generell steht all das in dem Kontext, der leicht ironisch auf meiner Benutzerseite dargelegt ist...
In diesen Fall ist es so dass die Bildbeschreibung "Derived from File:Pffffft.gif" lautete und normal hätte ich die als ins Description-Feld geschoben. Nur wenn ich mir File:Pffffft.gif anschaue verstehe ich nicht wie Blah blah.gif aus Pffffft.gif gemacht sein soll.
Aber egal: eine Bildbeschreibung ist das so oder so nicht. Die hat einfach gefehlt.
Genau wie bei den idR viel wichtigeren fahlgelben Mangelhinweisen in den urheberrechtlich bedeutsamen Feldern, ist es schlicht am Autor diese korrekt zu befüllen. Nicht dass ich z.B. das nicht leisten wollte, ich kann idR es einfach nicht.
Und auch der Beschreibungstext hier wäre eigentlich Sache des Autors. Ich hab mir jetzt um deinem Hinweis gerecht zu werden mal eine hochobjektive Beschreibung aus den Fingern gesaugt.
Grundsätzlich sollte es anders laufen: Wenn nach dem Aufräumen gelbe oder auch rote Mangelhinweise entstehen (und sie entstehen berechtigt!) dann sollte ein Bot den Einsteller auf seiner Disk auf eine unbedingt verständliche und erklärende Weise ansprechen und nachdrücklich aber sanft um Ergänzung, jedenfalls der unabdingbar wichtigen Informationen bitten. Damit werden wir nicht alle Datei(seit)en in einen akzeptablen Zustand bringen, aber vielleicht 50% - und das wäre schon gewaltig in absoluter Arbeit betrachtet.
Sorry für die längliche Antwort aus dem scheinbar nichtigen Anlass. Vielleicht wolltest du das jetzt gar nicht so hören. Aber es muss so oder so mal gesagt werden.
Gruss. --Itu (talk) 18:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Grundsätzlich finde ich deine Idee mit der Bot-Benachrichtigung nicht schlecht. In der en-WP gibt es solche Bots bereits. Allerdings gibt es auf Commons das Problem, dass man teilweise benachrichtigt werden könnte, auch wenn man den Fehler gar nicht verursacht hat. Bei diesen Edits sind beispielsweise die meisten korrekt. Trotzdem gelangen die Dateien teilweise erst durch sie in die Wartungskategorie, da die Dateibeschreibungsseiten neu gerendert werden. --Leyo 18:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you! edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

... das all deine Kribelkrabelinsekten aufschleckt :P

Kritzolina (talk) 12:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Black-box-finder WEB.svg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo [User:Itu|Itu], das ist ein sehr schönes Bild. Willst Du nicht auch eine deutschsprachige Version erzeugen ?

Grüße --Furfur (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ich hab es ja nicht selber gemacht. Und für mich ist das so schonmal gut. Aber ich halte niemand von einer Übersetzung ab ;) --Itu (talk) 23:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Danke. Ich hätte das auch nur gekonnt wenn der Text im Quellfile gestanden wäre. --Itu (talk) 02:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Black-box-finder WEB.svg edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Black-box-finder WEB.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Brian Dell (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Move of 140324-N-ZZ999-002 edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Itu, I have uploaded over 40,000 photographs from the Department of Defense and the unique key that I keep in the filename is the VIRIN. You have removed this in your renaming of this file. Not having the VIRIN in the filename makes it far more likely that we will have non-identical duplicate uploads in the future. As a consequence, this may have failed properly to comply with Commons:File renaming.

Could you please fix this by renaming to include the VIRIN and make it clear in the name that "Navy" means the U.S. Navy? --Fæ (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The old "Filename" is kept as redirect, so this should prevent the non(?)-identical duplicate uploads as before
Preventing kinds of duplicate upload, especially bit-identical ones is simple job of the system(If that fails this is a big fail).
Having that Virgin number in the file name would be ok. But i think it's not possible to make a second redirect, not beeing sysop. Now the description has "VIRIN: 140324-N-ZZ999-002". Even this should be sufficient for databaseworking/-controlling.
Maybe the Rules will not explicitly allow my action, but my pure common sense states that a filename should never be confused or abused for description. There is a description field in the information box, you know? --Itu (talk) 15:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I'm aware how it works, I have made a lot of uploads. The DoD has a particular problem with non-identical duplicates as they change their EXIF data for the same photograph depending on where they release it to, and they release these photographs on several sites including Flickr. This means that the Wikimedia Commons SHA-1 checks on the file do not work in order to detect duplicates. Using the filename to check for potential duplicates is far more reliable when using the in-Commons search engine or if we create alternative checks as we can then use a much smaller dump of metadata from Commons rather than a full dump. Please correct this filename so that it harmonizes with the vast majority of other files we host from this source, including the 40,000 uploads I have made using this community accepted standard filenaming pattern. Harmonization, and complying with existing practices of batch upload projects, are basic norms that the file renaming official guideline includes. --Fæ (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I would like to insist that a Filename is just a designator and not full-text-description, even if if that is accepted hundredthousand times before and not explicitly prohibited by the rules. This should be stopped, regardless how often it was done before.
Someone may turn back my renaming. As long as File:Navy Towed Pinger Locator.jpg is kept, i will not complain.
As long as something like File:Towed Pinger Locator VIRIN_140324-N-ZZ999-002.jpg is kept, i will not complain, too. --Itu (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Technically you should be able to move files same as i can do. Afaik it's not possible or at least not recommended to create more then one redirect(having more then 2 filenames) --Itu (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
You are using a special template {{milim - why not create and use a field virin=  ? That would be far more professionel than using the filename. Filename is not intended for database-keys, too. --Itu (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  1. I have never suggested that filenames are full description, in fact I have not objected to shortening the name.
  2. My batch upload projects do not simply use "full-text-descriptions". However if you think that I must be stopped after I have successfully uploading over 260,000 photographs to this project, please raise a request on COM:AN/U.
  3. I am not interested in move-warring with you. You have failed to fully comply with the official guidelines, this makes the onerous duty of tidying up after yourself, yours to handle rather than mine.
  4. The template does have "virin=". I have already explained how burying this information in the image page decreases the probability of identifying duplicates for future uploaders.
--Fæ (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bittner edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Woher hast Du diese Information? Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Da > rechts unterm Bild. mfg. --Itu (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:MH17-Route 13z15.svg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:MH17-Route 13z15.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kopiersperre (talk) 15:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Schabe edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo itu,

Bezüglich dieses Schabenbild: Kannst Du zwecks möglicher Bestimmung noch nachreichen wann und wo die Schabe abgelichtet wurde? Und hättest Du u.U. noch ein Bild derselben wo etwas mehr des Kopfes zu sehen ist? Danke schonmal Pudding4brains (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nachtrag: Soeben hier gefunden. Fund"ort" Rhein-Neckar, Deutschland. DD 2011-08-24.
Damit wird es wohl ein Weibl Planuncus tingitanus s.l. sein, die war ja schon plusminus seit 2007 in Süddeutschland unterwegs.
Ein weiteres Foto des Kopfes wäre aber trotzdem nicht schlecht zur Absicherung
Pudding4brains (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi. Schön dass jemand meine Viecher anschaut und bestimmt. Direkt von vorne hab ich kein Bild. Hilft das hier?
Wenn du Lust hast evt. weitere Bilder zu drehen und auszuschneiden könnt ich dir die roh zukommen lassen. gruss. --Itu (talk) 08:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh, Treffer? "aufsehenerregende Entdeckung" !? --
Aha. Grosse Unbestimmtheit. --
Zeitungsartikel, ~Genbestimmung. --
dpa vom 01.06.2014 (via focus)
........... etc. --Itu (talk) 09:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
PS: Bin auch im chat erreichbar --Itu (talk) 16:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi itu,
Jo, das Geschreibe auf observation.org war meins ;o) Wenn Du mir die Bilder schicken könntest würde ich gerne sehen was ich da noch rauskitzeln kann. Das einfachste Merkmal gegenüber vergleichbare Arten (pallidus/vittiventris) ist die Färbung am Hinterkopf zwisschen den Augen, aber vieleicht finde ich so ja auch noch was. Die RAWs, oder Link nach wetransfer oder sontwas, können dann an:
pudding4brains ÄT gmail PUNKT com
Danke schonmal :o) Pudding4brains (talk) 22:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ich hoffe das ist dieselbe mailadresse wie unter "Email this user" , an letztere hab ich das jetzt mal geschickt. gruss. --Itu (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Johannes Rohr (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Yellowstar new look 2012 by mast88-d4kqlae.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yellowstar new look 2012 by mast88-d4kqlae.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Yellowstar new look 2012 by mast88-d4kqlae.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 21:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I'm not too familiar with CC-license tagging on deviantArt. But I wonder if this is a derivative of a non-free work, by virtue of the art style/body shape. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 01:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've nominated it for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yellowstar new look 2012 by mast88-d4kqlae.jpg. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 02:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
It's a bad mistake to assume good stuff can not (real and legal) exist with free license. --Itu (talk) 16:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Chandra khonnokyoong.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Please refrain from adding yellow noticed to the file namespace. Discuss it on the talkpage. Best. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Realfacepalm.jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Realfacepalm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

   FDMS  4    13:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Arsene Wenger (17220097516).jpg edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Arsene Wenger (17220097516).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Dudek1337 (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dudek1337 (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ba 349a Natter.svg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Itu,

The Ba 349a Natter.svg file is my own work. Of course I used source files for it from the net. Probably the http://www.aviastar.org/pictures/germany/bachem_natter.gif file was the template, but I don't remember exactly. All my aircraft drawings were made in AutCAD or DraftSight and converted to pdf or wmf. The final works were done in Inkscape and the files are saved in svgformat. Kaboldy (talk) 17:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK, i added the info. Be aware that confirmability (traceability) may help to defend legality of your work. And great thanks for all your work! --Itu (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

STOP ! edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Le défaut d'affichage vous est propre, merci de purger le cache et d'arrêter ce vandalisme. Regarder la miniature, elle n'est pas déformé. A.BourgeoisP (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

[1] ... sorry i was wrong about deformation, its a crop. But please create a new page for the modification. --Itu (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ok... at least i have seen deformation(=horizontal stretch ) in the thumbs of the "upload"-history at some point ... maybe not representing the real file/rendering ?!? --Itu (talk) 04:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've performed a history split. The two files are now at:
—RP88 (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! --Itu (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:DC-Embleme 1932 - 1935 - 1937.jpg‎ edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If you want to address specific users, it would probably be more useful to do so on their user talk pages... AnonMoos (talk) 06:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm trying to address other people too, uploader and who ever cares about the specific file. And to keep discussions close to subjects. Generating bot-notices on userpages eventually may also be done. --Itu (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Solar_system_barycenter.svg edit

 
Hello, Itu. You have new messages on another wiki at [[file_talk:Solar_system_barycenter.svg#{{{2}}}]].
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Mural Guillem de Castro 2015 - 15.jpeg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
[2] >>

Is a Graffiti. As you can see in the description and the Category, it is located in Guillem de Castro street, so FoP-Spain also applies.--Coentor (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hmmmmm,
ok, didn't know at all commons is that liberal with graffiti(is it really?) - contrary to the usual policies.
Unfortunately i'm reading "Freedom of Panorama, where it exists, typically does not extend to permitting photographs of 2D artworks" at the same time, which i didnt knew before, too.
If it would apply, {{FOP} } may be added ... or {{Non-free graffiti} } ... dunno. --Itu (talk) 23:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

subtitle edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hallo!

koentest du hielfen mihr hier? grammatik und spelling?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/TimedText:Uspon_na_Supine,_8.stu.2015.webm.de.srt

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/TimedText:Uspon_na_Supine,_8.stu.2015.webm.en.srt --Quahadi Añtó 09:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Picasso-postcard1918-09-05b.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Picasso-postcard1918-09-05b.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deine Commons-Transfers edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Itu. Bitte sei doch nicht zu bequem, um deine Commons-Transfers zu kategorisieren und ggf. etwas nachzuarbeiten. --Leyo 12:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. So sehr ich die Notwendigkeit eines Taggens bei Dateien grundsätzlich einsehe, so umständlich kann es oft sein.
Grundsätzlich müsste man das zuerst an den Uploader richten. Und hier fängt die Misere schon damit an dass völlig sinnlos lokal hochgeladen wird und niemand versucht das zu steuern.... und das bei wikilokalen Dateien Kategorien fast immer fehlen stört intressanterweise sowieso niemand. --Itu (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Bezüglich des lokalen Hochladens stimme ich dir zu. Es gibt immer wieder Versuche, de:Spezial:Hochladen so anzupassen, dass commonsfähige Dateien hier hochgeladen werden, aber es gibt da Benutzer, die sich querstellen. Diskussionen hierzu gibt es etwa unter de:MediaWiki Diskussion:Uploadtext. Wo das zuletzt diskutiert wurde, kann dir vielleicht Martin Kraft sagen.
Bezüglich der Kategorisierung: Sooo gross ist der Aufwand für eine halbwegs gute Kategorisierung dann auch wieder nicht. Die meisten Transfers durch Wdwdbot sind übrigens kategorisiert. --Leyo 22:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fails edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Fails has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Takeaway (talk) 18:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Armenian Genocide-Logo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Armenian Genocide-Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Masur (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File talk:ThotXmas.svg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Thot with a Christmas tree

Hi, sorry for being late. I don't think that I put on one, but if you need it I can easily do this without the Xmas tree. --HoremWeb Place of Auditions 08:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

That would be nice. cheers. --Itu (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File talk:Luz Long Autogramm.JPG edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Itu,

Deine Frage zur Herkunft des Autogramms: der Besitzer bin ich selbst. Den Zettel mit dem Autogramm habe ich mit meiner Digitalkamera fotografiert. Der Zettel überdauerte die Jahrzehnte in einem Bildband über die Olympischen Sommerspiele 1936 und liegt nach wie vor zwischen den Seiten, die Luz Long und Jesse Owens nebeneinander auf dem Bauch liegend beim Plaudern zeigen (was für eine damalige Publikation schon bemerkenswert war).

Luz Long (damals 23) gab das Autogramm meinem Vater (damals 11) ein paar Tage nach den Olympischen Spielen 1936. Das genaue Datum lässt sich nicht mehr ermitteln, da mein Vater verstorben ist. In Nazi-Deutschland war es üblich, dass alle deutschen Medaillengewinner unmittelbar nach den Spielen öffentlich "herumgereicht" werden. Einer dieser öffentlichen Plätze für Long war das "Friedrich-List-Gymnasium" im Leipziger Stadtteil Gohlis. Dort war Luz Long früher zur Schule gegangen, und mein Vater war zurzeit da Schüler. Kurz: Luz Long hat den interessierten Schülern Autogramme gegeben. Insofern ist auch die Bildunterschrift in Wikimedia korrekt, dass das Autogramm nach dem Medaillengewinn und nicht irgendwann vorher, als Long noch nicht so bekannt war, geschrieben wurde.

Das ist alles, was ich darüber sagen kann.

Beste Grüße -- Smokeonthewater (talk) 10:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank. Ich kopiere das dann einfach mal auf File talk:Luz Long Autogramm.JPG. --Itu (talk) 11:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:CFM56-7.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CFM56-7.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Wdwd (talk) 05:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also nach meinem Verständnis hat das keine SH , weil keine Kreativität. --Itu (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:CFM56-7.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CFM56-7.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CFM56-7.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 04:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Siehe oben. Registriert ihr es eigentlich wenn hier geantwortet wird? --Itu (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:CFM56-7.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:CFM56-7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 00:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Auflieger wird abgeschleppt (31723510446).jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
File:Auflieger wird abgeschleppt (31723510446).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Raymond 13:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hmpf, doof, da hab ich gar nicht hingeschaut .... Man sollte sowas rechtzeitiger erkennen und gegenwirken, auch auf flickr zurückwirken.... Gibt es hier überhaupt eine Blacklist für solche flickr-Benutzer/-Alben? --Itu (talk) 13:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Culex pipiens Pete DeVries.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Culex pipiens Pete DeVries.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bestiasonica (talk) 17:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fuchs du hast die Gans gestohlen.jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fuchs du hast die Gans gestohlen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 09:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Capstone Produkt A formula.svg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Capstone Produkt A formula.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leyo 19:17, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

File talk:Chopine (PSF).jpg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See my reply there, and please don't add similar messages to other files... AnonMoos (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Oxycarenus lavaterae 1600181.jpg edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Oxycarenus lavaterae 1600181.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Austin Horse (talk) 09:42, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Special:Diff/256223214 edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Itu. Das ging schief. Magst du vielleicht Creator:Alexander Zick anlegen und einbinden? --Leyo 08:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hm, mit dem Creator hat das ja nichts zu tun dass der Uploader definitiv nichts in der Authorzeile zu suchen hat (genausowenig wie ein wiki-upload eine Quelle ist). Das da hab ich mal naiv ausprobiert, wenn es funktioniert hätte wäre es evt. eine Lösung für das Uploader-ist-nicht-Autor-Problem gewesen. Ich hab aber schon registriert dass das nicht funktioniert, aber dennoch belassen, denn es ist nur wirkungslos. Theoretisch könnte das ein Anstoss werden dass jemand diese Zeile implementiert.
Grundsätzlich gibt es hier ja ein Riesenproblem damit dass ganz viele Leute scheinbar glauben dass (innerwiki)-Upload-Angaben irgendetwas mit Quellen- oder Autorangabe (oder auch nur Datumsangabe) zu tun haben.
Wenn dieses Problem mal auch nur angegangen würde, wären wir schon einen grossen Schritt weiter. --Itu (talk) 14:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Ja, es gibt etliche leider Dateien, bei denen die Informationen am falschen Ort stehen (Beispiele). Falls du einen neuen Parameter vorschlagen möchtest, du tue dies doch bitte unter Template talk:Information. --Leyo 15:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Wenn ich mir sicher wäre dass das eine gute Lösung wäre hätte ich das wohl schon getan, so war es einfach nur mal ein spontanes Probiern, kann gerne revidiert werden. --Itu (talk) 15:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:RelaisstarterLSR.png edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

"electronic ciruit" is not a valid parameter for the {{Convert to SVG}} template. You probably want to use "circuit". -Apocheir (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Uh, i wasn't aware there are predefined parameters... instead i thought this i just a free choose of category.
But i would prefer not to specify anything - categories still exist for every File. --Itu (talk) 18:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
PS: and why is there no menu or pulldown or autocomplete for chosing ? --Itu (talk) 21:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Test01.gif edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Test01.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mitte27 (talk) 13:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

France Gall (colorized) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Itu ! First, I wish you a Happy Ne Year. I made myself the crop and colorization of the picture. Best regards. Tisourcier (talk) 17:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year.
Could you please explain how you got the colors? --Itu (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Novichok structures. edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Itu. All supposed novichok structures with phosphorylated phosgene oxime type structure are redrawn from "Ellison, D. Hank (2007). Handbook of Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-420-00329-1." on pp 37-41. However he does not specify which agent is which, it is "Hoenig, Steven L. (2007), Compendium of Chemical Warfare Agents, Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-34626-7" which specifies that the one with fluoro-chloro-oxime and 3-chloroprop-2-oxy substitution is A-232, and suggests the binary reagents. The alternative Novichok structures with amidine or guanidine substitution, plus sulfur and selenium analogues of classic nerve agents, are from "Mirzayanov, Vil S. (2008), State Secrets: An Insider's Chronicle of the Russian Chemical Weapons Program, Outskirts Press, ISBN 978-1-4327-2566-2". There was debate for some time as to which were correct, and "Gupta, Ramesh C., ed. (2015), Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents, Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-128-00494-4" shows examples from both types.

However since this recent poisoning incident, more sources have come to light, the writer of the recent article "Peplow, Mark (13 March 2018), "Nerve agent attack on spy used 'Novichok' poison", Chemical & Engineering News, 96 (12), p. 3" favors Mirzayanov's structures, and cites a reference "Foldi L, Vasarhelyi G. History of Russia’s chemical weapons. AARMS 2007; 6(1):135-146." which although it does not give any structures, it makes references to chemistry of the binary agents which is consistent with Mirzayanov's structures, but would not be consistent with the structures listed by Ellison / Hoenig. Notably this article was published in 2007, a year before Mirzayanov's book was published with his version of the structures in 2008. The Foldi paper in turn cites an inaccessible source seemingly from Hungarian military, "L. HALÁSZ, K. NAGY: Chemistry of toxic substances, Miklós Zrínyi National Defence University 2001, pp. 47–59 (in Hungarian)." So this appears to be independent verification of Mirzayanov's claims.

Also, Mirzayanov claims that many weaker compounds from this research were disclosed in the open literature as new organophosphate pesticides to be a cover for the illicit nerve agent research. Indeed, the structures proposed by Ellison / Hoenig do have Soviet literature sources, e.g.

  • Kruglyak Yu L, Malekin SI, Martynov IV. Phosphorylated oximes. XII. Reactions of 2-halophospholanes with dichlorofluoronitrosomethane. Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii. 1972; 42(4):811-14.
  • Raevskii OA, Chapysheva NV, Ivanov AN, Sokolov VB, Martynov IV. Effect of Alkyl Substituents in Phosphorylated Oximes. Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii. 1987; 57(12):2720-2723
  • Raevskii OA, Grigor'ev V Yu, Solov'ev VP, Ivanov AN, Sokolov VB, Martynov IV. Electron-Donor Functions of Ethyl Methylchloroformimino Methylphosphonate. Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii. 1987; 57(9):2073-2078

Since Mirzayanov's structures do not have CAS numbers and are not in the literature, this actually seems more likely to me that these are the true military secrets, while these oxime type structures that were published were probably the "cover" compounds that Mirzayanov refers to. Meodipt (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for that great overview! --Itu (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
What is the source of the last row ? Its not in Ellison (2.ed.)--Claude J (talk) 12:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
What file do you mean, Claude? --Itu (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
He is talking about "Novichok examples.png" image or derived svg. Bottom middle and bottom right are more compounds from old Soviet literature, apparently "Kruglyak, Yu. L.; Malekin, S. I.; Leibovskaya, G. A.; Khromova, Z. I.; Sretenskaya, I. I.; Martynov, I. V.: Reaction of Alpha-Chloronitrosoalkanes with Phospholanes and Iminophosphites, Khim. Primen. Fosfororg. Soedin., Tr. Konf., 4th (1972), Meeting Date: 1969, p. 307-312. Editor: Grechkin, N. P. Publisher: Nauka, Moscow, USSR." this reference from here [3] which is in turn listed as reference for pt.wiki page about C01-A035 [4]. Bottom left is just internet rumour, it was written as SMILES code on talk page for en.wiki Novichok article back in 2006, along with code for Hoenig's version of A-230 [5] No idea of source, but the structure is consistent with the other phosphoryl dihalooxime type structures listed by Hoenig / Ellison so I threw it in there with the rest (standards on sourcing were less strict back in 2008!) Meodipt (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Novichok examples.png , 2008 by Meodipt

@Meodipt: do you know your name is in the (now even a bit famous) Handelsblad article ? --Itu (talk) 12:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC) PS: mail me for a PDF version of the article, if necessary.Reply

Hi Itu. Wow, not sure why they would single me out, all I did really was summarise the structures discussed on that old roguesci thread and draw the structure images. All the searching through old Russian journal articles was done by others long before I came across this discussion. I had thought that old roguesci thread was long since deleted from the internet so good to see it backed up [6] It does seem increasingly clear now that Mirzayanov's structures are the correct ones, and these many other structures are indeed older compounds from the research (presumably the ones rejected as being "not militarily useful") This structure they call GD-7 [7] is interesting, it is listed in "Ledgard J. A laboratory history of chemical warfare agents (2nd, 2006). ISBN 978-0-6151-3645-5" as V.sub.X but with no reference, also there are similar compounds discussed in "Black RM, Harrison JM. The chemistry of organophosphorus chemical warfare agents. Chapter 10 of The chemistry of organophosphorus compounds. Volume 4, Ter- and quinque-valent phosphorus acids and their derivatives. (1996) ISBN 0-471-95706-2", but it is not listed in authoritative reviews such as Ellison. Seems there are many more compounds about which all information is presumably classified, "agent VP" has a structure and a patent but absolutely no other mention in literature I can find, and supposedly "agent GJ" that USA leaked to the Soviets was also real compound just unstable one that again was deemed not militarily useful. It looks as though the public use of this Novichok agent may result in many other compounds becoming publicly known that people may wish had been kept secret. Perhaps this was the intention of whoever deployed it. Meodipt (talk) 20:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:USGS-Poster-Tohoku Earthquake-20110311.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:USGS-Poster-Tohoku Earthquake-20110311.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 12:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Verschaffelt Moses von Michelangelo.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Verschaffelt Moses von Michelangelo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 10:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Formeldarstellung edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Erzwungenes Einrücken mit geschützten Leerzeichen funktioniert nur dann gut, wenn sichergestellt ist, dass alle Leser dieselbe Schriftarteinstellung nutzen wie der Einrücker: https://ibb.co/6yHHWdw --Kreuzschnabel 07:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hallo
Hier seh ich gar nichts , aber du meinst das hier
Dass das hilfloses Gepfriemel ist, ist mir klar. Gibt es eine gescheite Lösung für notwendigen whitespace in wikitext? Ohne dass man HTML-Künstler sein muss? --Itu (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Verschlimmbesserung edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Itu, es ist nett von Dir, wenn Du bei früher hochgeladenen Dateien die Beschreibung in eine damals noch nicht existierende {{Information}}-Vorlage packst. Du solltest dann aber bitte darauf achten, dass Fehler wie dieser hier nicht unterlaufen, die das Dokument über anderthalb Jahrtausende haben älter erscheinen lassen. Und wenn schon Vorlagen verwendet werden, dann sollten bitte auch die Daten korrekt mit den Datumsvorlagen spezifiziert werden und {{Unknown}} statt „n/a“ angegeben werden. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Args, da habe ich extra nochmal gecheckt wie man die Zeitrechnung international am besten angibt ... und dann einen Blödsinnsfehler gemacht, ja.
Allerdings kann ich das „wenn schon - denn schon“ nur begrenzt akzeptieren. Hier sehe ich das eher genau andersrum: Besser eine teilweise Verbesserung entsprechend dem Wikiprinzip als ein alles oder gar nichts.
Mir schien und scheint auch n/a durchaus passender als unknown , denn mit gewisser Wahrscheinlichkeit lässt sich ein Autor ausmachen, es ist halt nur so dass dieser Autor zuerst mal von randständigem Interesse ist.
Grundsätzlich meine ich wenn wir von Perfektionismus reden dann müsste hier vieles grundsätzlich anders gebaut werden auf commons: etwas mehr Datenbank als normal-wiki und viele Vorlagen sind zweifellos auch noch nicht der Weisheit letzter Schluss.
Aber sorry wegen dem Fehler. Oder besser: Mea culpa ... --Itu (talk) 23:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bilder Fridays for Future edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Itu,

erstmal schön, was du da für lustige Regeln auf deiner Benutzerseite formuliert hast.

Zu den Bildern: Die sind ja wirklich anschaulich, jedoch frage ich mich, wie spät abends du gearbeitet hast, um diese unscharfen Bilder hochladen zu können. ;-) (Example 1; Example 2)

Und der Sinn des ersten Bildes erschließt sich mir nicht so ganz... (stelle dir hier bitte einen thinking-smiley vor)

Best regards, wie es so schön heißt, Craeosh 77 (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Das erste Bild ist das Rathaus und den Kontext findest du im Artikel
Das zweite Bild hätte einen gewissen Gegensatz illustrativ darstellen können.
Das sind die Gründe warum ich diese Bilder hochgeladen habe, auch wenn ich Sie am Ende eben nicht verwendet habe.
Übrigens sind diese ganzen Bilder mit einer alten, billigen Taschenknipse gemacht worden nachdem mir der Akkusaft für das bessere Gerät schnell ausgegangen ist. Und dafür ist die Ausbeute doch sehr beachtlich. Kommt also gar nicht so extrem auf das fotografische Equipment an.
In diesem Zusammenhang geht auch an dich der Tipp: Einfach so viel knipsen wie möglich - das steigert die Ausbeute.
mfg. --Itu (talk) 16:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ok, verstehe. Du trägst alles bei, was du hast, auch wenn du nur einen Bruchteil brauchst ... Danke für den Tipp. --Craeosh 77 (talk) 10:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important message for file movers edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Ruth Olshan.jpg edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ruth Olshan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ruth Olshan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

OK, there is no explizit license at the source= https://www.jewiki.net/wiki/Datei:DSC_0170_Kopie.JPG
So i obviously refered to the general wiki-license, displayed at all pages.
But i have no problem with deleting this file if evidence of permission is to weak. --Itu (talk) 14:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:"Village People" smiley.png edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:"Village People" smiley.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BlinxTheKitty (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wine glass5275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support QI although there may be a slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 17:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:"Village People" smiley.png edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:"Village People" smiley.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:GOCE inside.jpg edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:GOCE inside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

vip (talk) 22:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Citavi 5 Literatur-Zitate-Vorschau.jpg edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Citavi 5 Literatur-Zitate-Vorschau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add category edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! Please add correct category to uploaded files. Example Category:Ukraine solidarity protest Mannheim 2022-03-05. Thanks! --Микола Василечко (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Now, that is too much for doing it manually. How to automate? ... Ok, you still did it. --Itu (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Regards, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Pyriproxyfen 02.svg edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Pyriproxyfen 02.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leyo 21:43, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 13:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 08:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Stefan Weil Schützenausmarsch.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
 File:Stefan Weil Schützenausmarsch.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: unused and undesired redirect)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Stefan Weil.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

... und sogar noch ein paar mehr. Mein Name ist mit ein Grund, warum ich denke, dass diese Weiterleitungen eher störend als hilfreich sind. Viele Grüße, Stefan Weil (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Stefan Weil Ausmarsch.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 File:Stefan Weil Ausmarsch.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: unused and undesired redirect)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Stefan Weil.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

section heading added here edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
[animations removed because of CPU-comsumption]

Tous mes voeux pour cette nouvelle année !
―Tisourcier

Hi Tisourcier, could you please answer my question above? --Itu (talk) 08:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Itu&oldid=838422489"