Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jamain!

-- 09:14, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Catégories edit

Merci pour vos premiers ajouts dans Commons. J'ai remplacé votre catégorie Parc communal par Category:Parc communal de Mouscron. Je vous suggère de bien observer la hiérarchie des catégories pour un sujet donné, dans ce cas Category:Parks > Category:Parks by country > Category:Parks in Belgium > Category:Parc communal de Mouscron. Voir la page d'introduction aux catégories. Bonne suite ! -- MHM (talk) 08:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, je tâcherai de faire attention, merci. - Jamain (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:35, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

Someone has a new message for you... edit

 

Thanks for all the pics. Penyulap 12:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.   --Jamain (talk) 08:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Dindon de Ronquières edit

Hallo Jamain, thanks for uploading, the Ronquières. Do you know its colours? [1]
  • fauve
  • à épaulettes jaunes
  • jaspé
  • perdrix
  • blanc

Thank you. --PigeonIP (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Jamain, merci pour le téléchargement, les Ronquières. Connaissez-vous ses couleurs? [2]
  • fauve
  • à épaulettes jaunes
  • jaspé
  • perdrix
  • blanc
Je vous remercie. --PigeonIP (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour PigeonIP, je sais qu'il existe différentes couleurs [3], mais n'étant pas spécialiste, je ne prendrai pas le risque d'affirmer à quelle catégorie appartiennent les deux dindes et le dindon que je photographie. D'autres photos suivront...  

Merci pour l'information. --Jamain (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello PigeonIP, I know that there are various colors, but not being a specialist, I shall not take the risk of asserting to which category belong both turkeys (female) and the turkey (male) which I photograph. Other photos will follow...  

Thank you for the information. --Jamain (talk) 09:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re : Bonjour edit

Sympa ta page utilisateur, bon vent à toi. --Jamain (talk) 09:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)  Reply

Merci pour ton message, c'est très gentil.  :-) VerboseDreamer (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Jamain,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Jamain,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jamain,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Photo Challenge edit

Jamain, thanks for voting on the challenges. I noticed that when you voted, you removed some HTML comments that guide voters where to stick their votes. I'm sure this was an accident. Please have a look at the fixes I did to see what went wrong. The comments help ensure people put their vote in the collapsed (hidden) portion of the page. Regards, -- Colin (talk) 21:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, it won't happen anymore, best regards --Jamain (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Je suis Charlie Mouscron, Belgium J3.jpg edit

 
File:Je suis Charlie Mouscron, Belgium J3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 23:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Château Ducru-Beaucaillou 1986 J2.jpg edit

 
File:Château Ducru-Beaucaillou 1986 J2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 07:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Château Pavie 1990 J2.jpg edit

 
File:Château Pavie 1990 J2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 21:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open! edit

 

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Jamain,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

La Fraternelle edit

Bonjour,

Pour ne pas continuer une conversation hors sujet sur le Bistro.

Concernant la Fraternelle, n'y a-t-il pas l'une ou l'autre carte postale présentant la maison du Peuple ancienne et la salle des fêtes dans le DVD dont tu parle sur le Bistro ? Je pense écrire un article sur le sujet et quelques illustrations sont toujours agréables.

Merci, bien à toi et bonne continuation.

--H2O(talk) 15:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Si H2O, il y en a pas mal. Je te propose, si un jour tu passes dans le coin, avertis-moi, on se fait rendez-vous quelque part, et on s'arrangera avec le DVD, j'ai une copie des deux tiers du DVD sur deux CD-ROM (avec la Fraternelle). Ce sera plus simple et plus pratique. --Jamain (talk) 16:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Merci. Quand je passe dans le coin, c'est pour rendre visite à mes parents. Je te tiens au courant. --H2O(talk) 16:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
OK, je suis facilement disponible. --Jamain (talk) 16:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mausolées et orgues de l'église Saint-Barthélémy edit

Je continue  

Les mausolées et les orgues de l'église Saint-Barthélémy sont classées.
Mes photos des mausolées sont de piètre qualité et je n'ai pas eu l'occasion de les photographier tous.
Aucune photo de l'orgue n'est disponible sur Commons.

Contrairement à la maison Picarde, l'église est souvent ouvertes. Si tu as l'occasion d'y faire un saut.

Merci.

--H2O(talk) 16:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Les mausolées sont dans un endroit très sombre et je n'ai pas de flash ! Et les orgues, si je les trouve, et si elles ne sont pas dans un coin sombre, j'essaierai. --Jamain (talk) 16:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:France, élection présidentielle 2017 J3.jpg edit

 
File:France, élection présidentielle 2017 J3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:France, élection présidentielle 2017 J2.jpg edit

 
File:France, élection présidentielle 2017 J2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th edit

 
Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. In Africa two weeks later.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

  #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

  Wiki Science Competition

Desolé pur l'anglais.--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

File:Russia World Cup 2018 in Belgium J3.jpg edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Je ne comprends pas grand chose à cette affaire. Cette photo présente les mêmes caractéristiques, même licence et tout, et ne pose pas de problème ! Je ne vois pas ce que je dois changer ! Cordialement --Jamain (talk) 08:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Russia World Cup 2018 in Belgium J6.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russia World Cup 2018 in Belgium J6.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Russia World Cup 2018 in Belgium J2.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russia World Cup 2018 in Belgium J2.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Omer Huyse edit

Hello, you made the photo of the grave of Omer Huyse in Luingne. Do you live near to this place? I just wrote an article about him for the German Wikipedia and would like to have a photo of the bust in Luingne. Can you help me? Merci. --Nicola (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good morning, as we are in confinement period (Covid-19) in Belgium, we can't go out a lot. As soon as it will be possible, I'll take a photo of the bust of Omer Huyse, I live a few kilometers away. Kind regards, --Jamain (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Nicola: It's done, Omer Huyse. --Jamain (talk) 12:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello Jamain - merci beaucoup!! Joyeuses pâques, --Nicola (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Mouscron Grand-Place J5a.jpg edit

Hi Jamain, could you please add the name of the creator/sculptor of the golden statue in the foreground to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The same for File:Omer Huyse (bust) J1.jpg and File:Omer Huyse (bust) J2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Túrelio: It's done. --Jamain (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

IP edit

Cher Rapaloux, je suis un étudiant au Québec, juste pour vous dire que 205.237.30.142 sont des IPs scolaire dans la même école, mais c'est bloqué indéfiniment sur Wiktionnaire. Il y a des étudiants qui ont besoin de modifier les articles. Pouvez-vous les bloquer jusqu’à la fin d’année scolaire (juin 2022) sur Wiktionnaire SVP? Merci. PhunWi1 (talk) 17:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Je ne suis pas Rapaloux, mais Jamain. Si vous avez un problème sur Wiktionnaire, c'est là-bas qu'il faut vous adresser. --Jamain (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Andrea Pallaoro J1.jpg edit

 
File:Andrea Pallaoro J1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Theboywholovedmichelangelo (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Andrea Pallaoro J2.jpg edit

 
File:Andrea Pallaoro J2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Theboywholovedmichelangelo (talk) 11:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Présidentielle 2022 (affiches) J1a.jpg edit

 
File:Présidentielle 2022 (affiches) J1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Legume edit

CC By-SA 3.0 & GFDL licenses 71.38.64.201 18:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:France, élections régionales 2015 J2.jpg edit

 
File:France, élections régionales 2015 J2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine de la place de la République, Lille J1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merci. --Jamain (talk) 08:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply