User talk:Josve05a/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Copyright status: File:Bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis) - Flickr - Jay Sturner.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis) - Flickr - Jay Sturner.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Zayn Wiki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Copyright status: File:Scilla liliohyacinthus - Flickr - S. Rae.jpg
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed Josve05a (talk) 04:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
File download
http://koti.kapsi.fi/~federico/tmp/josvepol.zip / https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/11945 --Nemo 19:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
QI nominations from Category:Photographs by Genusfotografen
"All nominated images should be the work of Commons users." But I can't see any link confirming these are of Genusfotografen. If it is confirmed through OTRS, better mark that category and user account. Jee 15:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
More nature
Oh nice, did you already run out of photos to categorise from the previous round? :o Nemo 14:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- No, I just didn't finish uploading this users images from last time ;) Josve05a (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
OWAA cover
You really need to stop deleting my uploads because your reasons for doing so are not valid. There are NO COPYVIOS and if you have an issue with something, please contact me before you take action. Put the image back that you deleted. Atsme 📞 04:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Well, it is a cover of a magazine which you do not won the copyright for. Same as with User talk:INeverCry/Archive 20#OWAA logo it seems? Josve05a (talk) 09:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Those releases are forthcoming which is why it is better to contact a (veteran) uploader beforehand. It would have saved us a lot of wasted time. Atsme 📞 18:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Fotona av Genusfotografen
Hejsan, det blev lite strul med de bilder tagna av kontot markerat som "Genusfotografen" när bilderna nominerades för Quality Images. Det var helt enklet inte klarlagt ifall detta konto tillhör en användare eller om det var ett konto ni använde för ett antal fotografer unter projektet. För att en bild ska kunna nomineras till QI så måste den vara av en enda Commonsanvändare med ett konto. De flesta av bildrna åkte helt enkelt ur systemet, men en ligger kvar och väntar på svar. Har du lust och förklara lite hur det ligger till så att vi kan reda ut det hela? Du kan svara här, jag har din sida på min watchlist. w.carter-Talk 14:09, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Jag har, som OTRS-agent, bekräftat (via Facebook messenger) att detta är ett officiellt konto. Vet inte hur jag kan tagga/spara det i systemet...Josve05a (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- OTRS används ju mest när man ladder upp bilder tagna av icke-commons fotografer. Trasslet här är ju att bilderna inte laddats upp här av Genusfotografen själv utan av andra som du och Peter Isotalo. Det som gör det hela ännu luddigare är ju att ni under "author" bara skrivit "Genusfotografen (Tommas Gunnarsson) / Wikimedia" när ni istället borde skrivit Genusfotografen. Börja med att ändra detta i "Summary" och be Tommas att han i alla fall skapar sin användarsida här så att folk ser att han verkligen existerar på Commons. Som det ser ut nu så har den här personen inga som helst "Contributions" på sitt konto. Jag tror det är där den största stötestenen är. Massor med uppladdade bilder men inga "contribs", det ser mysko ut. Han är just nu ett spöke här. Några enkla knapptryckningar kan han väl kosta på sig för att skydda sina bilder och rättigheter här, samt få chansen att få sina bilder uppgraderade till QI eller kanske FP. w.carter-Talk 16:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, i want to know why you delete my photos of Michael Jackson please :)
Also, i want to know what kind of photos i can use. Sorry so much, but i am a new user (and sorry for my english, if it isn't perfect, but i am italian :D) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Interista1908 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 06 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Interista1908: You uploaded images which you found online. Such images are copyrighted. You can only upload image which you yourelf own the copyright for (e.g. by photographing the photo irl youself) or images which the copyright woner has licensed it under a free license. Josve05a (talk) 17:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Josve05a. Please pay attention not the break the syntax. --Leyo 09:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Leyo: Oh, I didn't no~tice that the script did that. Hmm...thanks! Josve05a (talk) 09:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
transfers with no {{Uncategorized}}
I just categorized one of your mushroom uploads and noticed that it was missing the usual daily {{Uncategorized}}. Have a look: File:Harlequin duck - record shots - Flickr - S. Rae (1).jpg. INeverCry 03:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. This Flickr stream-transfer (that is still happening) seems to be missing that command. Drats. Oh well, the bot will come around and tag eventually. Josve05a (talk) 03:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Another bot I knew nothing of! Of course I've had this same overlook happen, but I took a bunch of time to tag 3 or 4 sets with {{Uncategorized}} by hand with VFC... INeverCry 04:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Television logos of Canada
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:19, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:TQS logo 1993.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:TQS logo 1993.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Do You Remember Love film poster.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 10:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:250px-We-mapblank.png
File:250px-We-mapblank.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Jcb (talk) 00:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Direitos de autor
Ola, eu tenho varias imagens que queria carregar para a Wikimédia Commons. As imagens vieram do Facebook, portanto suponho que sejam livres de qualquer direito de autor. Certo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gap5200 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- No, publishing images on Facebook does not make them free of copyright. Josve05a (talk) 00:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 00:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Silent-runner brochure.pdf
It seems you have (still) nomiated the above document for deletion. I have responded to the email about the issue, volunteering sufficient documentation for the ownership of the content. No one responds. The procedures do not seem to work.
- Was deleted by Jcb due to not processed at OTRS for over 30 days...
- Josve05a (talk) 01:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 01:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello Josve05a. I've just your detetion notice related to Conservative (Party?) and I have been very surprised because I have never uploaded this logo or another of similar characteristics. It is possible that a user used an element from the heraldic files that what I really done, and this person could have used my name. In any case this is the first time I have any notice related to File:Conservative logo 2006.svg.png, check it please. Thanks so much. --Heralder (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- I was mistaken on the user talk page of L'honorable, it is all right I'm sorry. Best regards --Heralder (talk) 10:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, glad it was resolved :) Josve05a (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Please do not delete these pictures!
Dear Josve50a,
The first picture you wish to delete is not my own work, but I have asked for consent from the owner, which not only sent me the above pciture, but also sent wiki a mail approving the picture! It is the third time you are deleting this specific picture but I have took all the measures, including consent from the owner, to use it here. Please consider this before deleting it or specify further measures I should take in order for me to use it. The second picture is my own creation, it pictures my own face and I do give consent to use it myself for this purpose. Thank you!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocomoto (talk • contribs) 20:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Chocomoto: Images on Wikimeida Commons needs to be freely licensed by their copyright owner. If the owner has agreed to release an image under such a license, they should send an emial to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and confirm such a release. If they have only agreed for you to "use it on Wikipedia/here", then it is not permissible per our licensing policy. If they have sent in permission to the email (called "OTRS system"), and if it is accepted/verified, then the image will be undeleted. Please read COM:OTRS. Josve05a (talk) 20:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
I understand that and indeed they sent a permission email to permissions-commons@wikipedia.org a couple of days ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocomoto (talk • contribs) 21:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Chocomoto: Then, due to the image not being tagged as "pending email-review" before I deleted it, it will be undeleted when processed (~1 month processing time) if accepted. Josve05a (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Ok, thank you for your pacience and I hope to be accepted as it best ilustrates the page. Should I personally send a consent for the other picture, the portrait one? Thank you --Chocomoto (talk) 21:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Unless you are the photographer of an image, or if you paid for the copyright of an image, the only one that should send in permission is the copyright owner (photographer(s)). :) Josve05a (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Josve05a (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Aster family with bee pollinators - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Reventtalk 16:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:CVS Caremark (2).png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:CVS Caremark (2).png Sanandros (talk) 00:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8459320001).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8459320001).jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8459385811).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8459385811).jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8459402825).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8459402825).jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8460483270).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8460483270).jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8460501958).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8460501958).jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8460551594).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valentines Dinner, Ledson Winery, Kenwood (8460551594).jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Getty Images
How did you come to that I'm not the owner of this files? Why not asking first, then delete? What do you need from me as proofs? Edbarseghyan (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Noubar-afeyan-george-clooney-ruben-vardanyan-vartan-gregorian.jpg for instance were copied form Getty Images. The rest of the images were deleted as part of the same deletion, due to reasonable doubt (perhaps EXIF). If it is yours, follow these instructions: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:AA (7114486031).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:AA (7114486031).jpg DAAyanz (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Geum triflorum (Prairie Smoke) - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg
And also:
- File:Penstemon serrulatus - Flickr - brewbooks (1).jpg
- File:Salmonberry starting to flower - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 00:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Northern lights (16141458456).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Northern lights (16141458456).jpg lNeverCry 21:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 12:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Aarc-cia003-06 0057 0002.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aarc-cia003-06 0057 0002.png Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 12:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Aarc-cia003-06 0057 0003.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aarc-cia003-06 0057 0003.png Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 12:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Salzburg - Flickr - GregTheBusker (1).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Salzburg - Flickr - GregTheBusker (1).jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 12:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Stephi at Salzburg - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stephi at Salzburg - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 12:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 08:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Desert Side-blotched lizard - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 08:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
File:OMNI.1 Logo.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:OMNI.1 Logo.svg JuTa 11:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 11:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
File:OMNI.2 Logo.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:OMNI.2 Logo.svg JuTa 11:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 11:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thx for your attention
- This is odd. I got an echo notification (red number at the top) saying that you sent an email. However, no email can be found in my inbox...could you send it again, but directly to gladjonatan@outlook.com? Josve05a (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thx for letting me know. The system never sent me a copy either (even though in Preferences/Email options, I request copies of sent Emails; but perhaps that conflicted w/ my forgetting to check box to send myself a copy!?). Anyway, I just resent. Ok, IHTS (talk) 23:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Haven't received a copy of the re-sent WP Email, so I've done what you suggested now and sent to your Outlook. Ok, IHTS (talk) 02:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- FYI, I sent two followup mails to your Outlook. Ok, IHTS (talk) 04:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Just saw more emails from you, will respond tomorrow. (t) Josve05a (c) 00:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Please DO NOT upload files without putting them into any category
God Morgon!
I have noticed by coincidence that you have uploaded several thousands of aviation-related files without putting them into any subject-related category. By doing that, you are effectively hiding them away from access and use by all other users.
As a random example of today: Of the 200 files of your first page Category:Files uploaded by Josve05a (aviation) 138 do not have any subject category, roughly 70%.
Even if you intend to "do that, one-by-one, manually" "some time" it would be preferable to spread this task (currently 10.000+ files) among some experts. Putting them into the "Hidden category" Category:Aviation files (check needed) does not help either, since globally banned user Russavia and his hundreds of equally banned sockpuppets has created this "category" according his private and very personal taste without any consensus. Therefore, it contains almost 130.000 files which effectively prevents to check even a reasonably small proportion of them.
If you have no idea what type of aircraft those files actually represent, please put them into the proper category "Aircraft", where the (few) experts regularly take care of them.
So please, categorize your future aviation uploads at least into Category:Aircraft. Annars är det otroligt mödosamt och tidskrävande att hitta och sortera så manga vackra bilder för att göra dem tillgängligt till allmänheten.
Med vänliga hälsningar --Uli Elch (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Khot 2016
Please reconsider your close at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2016-10#File:Khot 2016 hi-res-download 3.jpg. The two sentences "...the applicable Creative Commons License will be Attribution: CC- BY. This permits non- commercial and commercial use by media as long as there is attribution." are not mutually exclusive. The second explains the former, but does not limit it.
They may reasonably be read as, say, "...the applicable Creative Commons License will be Attribution: CC- BY. This permits, for example, non- commercial and commercial use by media as long as there is attribution."
They should not be read as, say, "...the applicable Creative Commons License will be Attribution: CC- BY. This permits only non- commercial and commercial use by media as long as there is attribution."
-- Andy Mabbett (talk) 11:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- A counterbalancing view: I have to say I read this differently to Andy. "With respect to use of photographs and videos ... by the media, the applicable Creative Commons License will be Attribution: CC- BY" : to me means that they intend to offer the CC-BY licence only to "the media". Hopefully one of the Wikimedians who has contacted the Macarthur Foundation directly will be able to get us a more solid asnwer about their intentions. The Land (talk) 17:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Josve05a, may I ask why you did this edit ? The taxon information is already in Category:Pyrgus cirsii, I don't think it should stay in the redirect... --LamBoet (talk) 13:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is common in many taxon synonym redirects that the info accosiated with the "previous" name is kept. It is easier to "work out" the proper target in case of future renamings etc. if all links etc. for a taxa name is saves. (Ping @Liné1: who usually works with these cats as well.) (t) Josve05a (c) 14:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- I see; this sounds useful for subjective synonyms, but not so much so in the present case of two possible ranks for one name, whereby all taxon links should in principle be the same in both categories. As you wish :-) --LamBoet (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:Pixabay
Hello, I did not know this, when I wrote about it on the Village pump, but since you are actually the main author of template {{Pixabay}}, please see its talk page. — Speravir – 23:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Just for curiosity: Why isn’t there a swedish sub template? :-) — Speravir – 23:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Speravir. Back when I created the template there was an issue with file licensing, disappearing urls (going dead), not being in the Pixabay category etc. so I decided to copy the OpenCliparts-template and adapt the code for pixabay. The issues I came across were e.g. Montages of up to three such files (hence why they most likely were coded one and one). I'm a terrible coder and am surprised I could even do what little I did :p (As for the reason I didn't do an sv subpage is that's I didn't think of it (since I use wiki in English) and I couldn't be bothered at the time...) (t) Josve05a (c) 00:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for explanation. In fact, I should better have researched it on my own before writing to you … — Speravir – 19:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Speravir 23:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Jerry is happy - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jerry is happy - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg Edelseider (talk) 16:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Eamon Rockey picture
I see that the permission that Eamon Rockey offered wasn't sufficient to get his picture put up on his wiki. Could you please explain what is still missing in order to get the picture put up legitimately? I'd like to try to close the gap and understand what is missing. Thanks! Coffeecrutch (talk) 07:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Coffeecrutch: Sorry for the late response. I can't remember which file was the "Eamon Rockey picture" (I do to many tickets :p). If I delt with the ticket, I sent a message to the emailer about the issue(s), but I am not allowed to disclose such information on-wiki due to privacy and personaly information etc. I'd recomend you contact the emailer to see what the issues was, or leave a not on teh COM:OTRS/N and ask for further details on the tickets status. I might be "to strict" when it comes to not share information in tickets elsewhere, while others aren't as strict... (t) Josve05a (c) 22:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Jonatan. Since I last wrote, I was in touch with the photographer of the picture of Eamon Rockey. Signe Birck sent a permission form directly to your email on November 7th giving permission to use her picture. However, the tag on this page: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eamon_Rockey.jpg still shows that the permission has not been offered. Please advise. Coffeecrutch (talk) 08:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- It ha been recieved, but have not been processed again. I "left" the ticket, since I could not handle it myself, and instead added it back to the queue for another agent to handle the follow-up. (t) Josve05a (c) 11:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
{{RPA}}
Commons:Deletion requests/Template:RPA Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Schönbrunn Palace - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schönbrunn Palace - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 01:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Vuguru-logo.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vuguru-logo.jpg Carniolus (talk) 17:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File:MGG Logo001.jpg
Ich bitte um Auskunft, welches oder wessen Urheberrecht bei dem oben genannten LOGO verletzt worden sein soll. Das Logo enthält drei Violin-Silhouetten, den Schriftzug MGG und eine Feder und ist in dieser Zusammenstellung meines Wissens einzigartig. Worin also begründet sich die Löschung? --Hondali (talk) 21:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- The feather makes the logo become creative and above COM:TOO to be claimedto be free. (t) Josve05a (c) 01:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, you are right. Forget it - no publication!--Hondali (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File deletion
Hello. I have not logged into my account for ages, but today, willing to upload a few images, I have seen the deletion warning you left me regarding about the deletion of editor destacado.png, which was am image I created myself ages ago using Gimp to condecorate featured editors on the Spanish Wikipedia. It doesn't really matter, 'cause I don't work on that wiki anymore, but it would be good to know how the heck can I be accused of copying an image I created myself. Greetings from Mallorca. rafax (talk) 19:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- This was back in April, and I note that Natuur12 has undeleted the file, and I also not that GiMP has licensed their assets under {{GPLv3+}}, something which was not noted on the file page when I tagged it back in April, so all I knew was that the "user logo" have assets which may not be your own. (t) Josve05a (c) 14:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Split request for File:Pixabay-logo.svg
Hello, Josve, may it perhaps be better to discuss the split request for File:Pixabay-logo.svg in Commons:History merging and splitting/Requests? I think it is a bit more complicated or needs more information, because the old, overwritten version is the svg version of File:Pixabay-logo.png. Hence one should think at least of the names to be given after splitting, and the one who will take this action should know this. (You are an admin – you could ´make the split yourself in theory.) — Speravir – 18:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- If it needs discussion, feel free to list it there instead. I am an admin, but have never learned how merged are done... (t) Josve05a (c) 13:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Reventtalk 12:22, 15 December 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Escape Game Bratislava - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escape Game Bratislava - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Escape Game Bratislava - Flickr - GregTheBusker (1).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escape Game Bratislava - Flickr - GregTheBusker (1).jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 13:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Rock gegen Rechts Logo
- Moved to new section (t) Josve05a (c) 21:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Josve05a. Yesterday you deleted one of my graphics too, claiming a possible copyright violation. As Rafax, I am also wondering what indication you could possibly have for this accuse. Please consider being more carefull in the future and not to delete other people contributions unless you have reliable proof that there is something wrong. Btw, I can proove by the original vector graphic that I am the creator of the picture you deleted. Best regards, --David Schäfer (talk) 21:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- As a talk page stalker I have to wonder. Who do you ask a question when you believe you already have they answer? It is a bit rude to ask a question only to give a lecture after you have done so. This means that you already made up your conclusion before asking the question.
- Regarding the copyright status of the logo. Did you base it on an exciting logo or did you find clip arts online of guitars/drums? Natuur12 (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- @David Schäfer: , we get thousands of copyright violations every day, very often of logos like the one you created. Commons attracts fans of various celebrities, events, and causes and they will often upload images and logos without any care for copyrights or permissions. Especially professionally made logos that can be found on the net are a prime candidate. We do not have time to thoroughly research each and every submission, therefore we ask uploaders of such files to go through our COM:OTRS process. I would really appreciate you sending your permission there so that there won't be any problem with your file in the future. Thank you! --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Natuur12: , if in your opinion asking implicit questions is rude, and you express this with an implicit question, should I be mad now? ;) For the logo I seperatly vectorized photos of the different instruments, so it's my genuine work. @Srittau: , thank you for restoring the file and mentioning COM:OTRS. I'll consider it, but you know, my contributions to wikimedia-project are mainly finantial because I have a 1year old child and a time-consuming job. This incident has cost to much of my time already. A friendly warning/question before the accuse+deletion would have prevented all this.--David Schäfer (talk) 23:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Procedure dispute
I am coming to you from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dobroš, where you proposed the deletion of those files to be delated due to the copyright reasons. Thus you had to use OTRS needed template, not deletion discussion.
I have some questions to you regarding this deletion: This user has uploaded images taken from Google --> you cannot take images from Google, because Google is not a website. Google is a search engine, which displays images and pages of third parties. Thus this is not the argument to favour your request. The fact there are same pictures in Google may have more explanations.
and Getty Images, as well as uploaded images attributed to different names --> what does it mean, attributed to different names? How the attribution was set? Do you know the real name of user:Dobroš?
and taken with different cameras in the EXIF metadata. --> so it means, that a user cannot have different cameras? How many cameras were used?
3 of which has been deleted as obvious copyvio already. --> could you pointed me which ones and from where they were copyed please?
Some of these images might be PD-art, and should be kept. --> which ones and why? All of them were deleted.
As I can see, your activite led to the delation of all file of one users. Is this and intended activity or where does it come from?--Juandev (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- There is also the message, which is for you rather for Jcb. This shows again, that you had to request OTRS. I think this way we piss off volunteers.--Juandev (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- This was found and dicussed on IRC (@Yann: ). See the talk page for deletion notifications for the same day. There are 3 types of "deletions". peedy, slowed, and discussed. TO tag with a peedy deletion, one have to tag them individually with a source, tagging with a slowed deletion tag (OTRS needed/no source/no license etc.) only causes the files to not being discussed and ha a larger deletion rate than DRs. I even added a {{If copyright holder}} on the DR just in case the uploader being the authors of them all, despite there being many different names listed as authors and copyright owners in the EXIF metadata, all taken with different cameras. Tagging with "OTRS needed" would only case the files being deleted without any discusion possible; DRs are a "higher level" of deletion". (t) Josve05a (c) 00:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I see. Could you find, who discused this deletion on IRC?--Juandev (talk) 09:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- See above. I pinged the user. (t) Josve05a (c) 09:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- So, If I understand it well its Yann in both cases?--Juandev (talk) 07:58, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oh you mean the old discussion, no. I misread and thought you ment the above only. I have no idea who the user was for that old DR.Was a new user on IRC and hadn't registered their username to their nickname. (t) Josve05a (c) 09:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- And what was the nickname?--Juandev (talk) 11:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Professor John Dwyer portrait.jpg
Hello, @Josve05a: I was fascinated to see that you added an original (unretouched) version of file:Professor John Dwyer portrait.jpg, which is much higher definition than the one which the photographer sent to me. Do you mind if I ask where it came from and how you found it; you obviously have skills that would be useful to learn! --Gronk Oz (talk) 23:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- I should have added "The uploader on Wikimedia Commons received this from the author/copyright holder via OTRS.", but I didn't...I got it on OTRS, while just seeing the ticket in the queue, and I saw that it was a higher resolution than the current one, so I uploaded it. 23:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I see - it seems she must have sent me a low-res copy, and a high-res version to you. Thanks for taking care of that - you're easily worth double what they're paying you! --Gronk Oz (talk) 04:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Double? Why not triple? ;p (t) Josve05a (c) 05:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I see - it seems she must have sent me a low-res copy, and a high-res version to you. Thanks for taking care of that - you're easily worth double what they're paying you! --Gronk Oz (talk) 04:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted Logo GET Oficial.png
Regards Josve05a, yesterday was deleted the "Logo GET Oficial.png" but this logo has a CC-BY-SA license as explained on the software page: https://gnuetertics.org/article/logo-de-etertics-gnulinux/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantiagoGG (talk • contribs) 09:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- @SantiagoGG: I didn't delete it, I just tagged it for deletion due to unclear copyright status; Jcb deleted it. THe website does not specify which version of CC-BY-SA it is released under. It does state that the "web[site]" is under 4.0, but it doesn't specify f the logo, created by Pablo Lopez, is under the same version. 09:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Josve05a!
Josve05a, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:Lens_focal_length_4.0_mm has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:Lens_focal_length_5.0_mm has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:Lens_focal_length_6.0_mm has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:Lens_focal_length_8.0_mm has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Another inappropriate bulk process deleting large numbers of licensed files
Please respond at Commons:Village_pump#Another_bulk_process_to_delete_large_numbers_of_licensed_files Andy Dingley (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Translation administration
Hi! Please don't mark pages for translation without properly tagging them. To prepare a page for translation is not simply to put two <translate> tags – one in the beginning and the closing one in the end. It's a lot of work to do, so please read the documentation and tag the pages accordingly. Thanks!--Piramidion (talk) 13:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please feel free to revert all my translation-edits. I was clearly not knowledgeable enough to do it properly. I understand and accept that, and have resigned myself the translator admin rights. (t) Josve05a (c) 16:15, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have fixed one (Revision of 228499261), and will remove the others from translation, at least for now, until they're properly tagged, thanks! But if you're still eager to do the translation administration work, just read the documentation and look how the others do the tagging (tbh, some translation admins do a lot of mistakes). Imho, it's not that complicated, but needs some practice (and mistakes are unavoidable too). --Piramidion (talk) 16:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Preparing pages for translation
Hi! When you prepare a page for translation, please also add (almost always at the top)
<languages/>
tag as mentioned in mw:Help:Extension:Translate and mw:Help:Extension:Translate/Page translation administration. Also, which is more important, you must be extremely careful when you migrate to Translate extension pages that had been translated using old method because you may damage existing translations as you did in case of Spanish, French and Portugese translations of Help:SVG. I have never done this yet, but AFAIK such pages require special treatment as described in mw:Help:Extension:Translate/Page translation administration#Migrating to page translation. --jdx Re: 14:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)- Please feel free to revert all my translation-edits (if possible). I was clearly not knowledgeble enought to do it properly. I understand and accept that, and have resigned myself the translator admin rights. I am currently reading up on all these pages, but will not assigne myslef to become a translation admin in the near future again. Sorry for the issues I caused.(t) Josve05a (c) 16:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Edit2014
Just making sure you saw that Edit2014 has been modified, and should be ok now. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Wikipedia_Edit_2014.webm VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 13:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- I did see it, thank you. I'm just waiting for an other admin to "do the closing", just in case of "stuff". (t) Josve05a (c) 19:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Tagging licensed files for deletion?
Can you please explain this?
Are there more like this needing cleanup too? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- It is an artwork by someone named "Bruce Von Stetina" acording to description. COM:OTRS COM:PERMISSION is needed. (t) Josve05a (c) 17:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- So you're disputing the validity of the licence, which would require discussion through the deletion request process. But instead you've tagged it with a simple "no permission claimed" tag, which is an automatic deletion without any further review by other editors.
- I don't think you should be an admin. Your judgement (and especially after last week, which you've refused to comment on) isn't good enough. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- You're free to feel that if that is what you think.
- I tagged it with a "no permissions tag" (as well as a few more files uploaded by the same artist and user) due to here being no permission. Simple. These files are then reviewed after 7 days by another admin to check if there is OTRS permission or not. If they believe it requires discussion, s/he'll convert the nps to a DR. (When tagging with "No permission" the user gets a more detailed message on their user talk page on how to show permission than they would have gotten at a DR. Think of it like a "PROD"-deletion tag on English Wikipedia, if someone contest it, they can convert it to a DR with a simple button press (there is a button that says "convert to DR", or osmething like that) under the tag.
- If you believe I am not fit to be an admin, feel free to start a de-admin vote, if there is (policy-accepted) reason for it. (t) Josve05a (c) 19:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Josve05a. Would like to wish you and your family a happy new year. Since you are in charge of the OTRS for this image, I would like to refer you to this ticket. The copyright holder has apparently started a new ticket. Could you please look into it? Thanls for your attention. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Jianhui67: Tickets merged. I'm currently suffering from a headache and can't really do complicated wiki-work. Feel free to take over the ticket. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bungalow N°10 - Living room (16575188626).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bungalow N°10 - Living room (16575188626).jpg Austriantraveler (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bungalow N°10 - Outdoor Kitchen (16599933581).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bungalow N°10 - Outdoor Kitchen (16599933581).jpg Austriantraveler (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bungalow N°27 (16255353938).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bungalow N°27 (16255353938).jpg Austriantraveler (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bungalow N°27 (16255637230).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bungalow N°27 (16255637230).jpg Austriantraveler (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bungalow N°27 (16256735559).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bungalow N°27 (16256735559).jpg Austriantraveler (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Wake Jun 15 052 (18472965603).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wake Jun 15 052 (18472965603).jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Wake Jun 15 049 (19087952292).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wake Jun 15 049 (19087952292).jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wake Island
Affected:
And also:
- File:Wake Jun 15 016 (19087489962).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 017 (18470631264).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 018 (19096451561).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 019 (19096462951).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 020 (19087536502).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 025 (19093288865).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 038 (18905731040).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 040 (18472796083).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 041 (19093509685).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 042 (19093519735).jpg
- File:Wake Jun 15 043 (18907358079).jpg
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Wake Jun 15 047 (18472898513).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wake Jun 15 047 (18472898513).jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Banc De Binary One Touch Platform, Aug 11 2013.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banc De Binary One Touch Platform, Aug 11 2013.png Austriantraveler (talk) 23:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Esdaile photos
Hi Josve05a. Do you think you could delete all of the files linked to at User:Mz7/esdaile as copyright violations? It has become apparent through much correspondence at ticket:2016121710014768 and ticket:2016121710015123 that the files will not be made available under free licenses anytime soon. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Mz7: I trust your judgement, and have deleted them on your behalf. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! Mz7 (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Would you know why template:VN is not working and giving an error in Lua, line 640? Sobreira (parlez) 09:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging Liné1 who is the maintainer of Module:Wikidata4Bio. ^ (t) Josve05a (c) 10:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am on it ;-) Cheers Liné1 (talk) 10:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging Josve05a Corrected. Cheers Liné1 (talk) 10:41, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am on it ;-) Cheers Liné1 (talk) 10:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Iguazu Falls - Flickr - GregTheBusker (4).jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iguazu Falls - Flickr - GregTheBusker (4).jpg Gauss (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC)- This section was archived on a request by: (t) Josve05a (c) 21:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Photo-phylles 2017
Hello,
I have noticed that you had uploaded on Commons lots and lots of good pictures of plants.
The Botanical Garden of Bordeaux, France, and the botanical society OÏKOS organise each year Photo-phylles, an important Salon of photographic Art dedicated to plants, mushrooms and myxomycetes. This competition is also pedagogical, the exhibition is installed in various places during finally about 5 months, and receive about 6,000 visitors, among them several thousands of schoolboys coming with their teachers.
There are no entry fees, this is not frequent !
I would be glad receiving some of your best photos. Just have a look here to see the rules and entry forpm : http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A
Closing date is January, 18.
A great salute from France !
Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Salon Chairman, but also administrator on the french Wikibooks.