Open main menu
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 83% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎svenska • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎العربية • ‎پښتو • ‎中文 • ‎日本語

このページでは、削除されたページやファイル(以下、まとめて「ファイル」と呼ぶ)の「削除の撤回」(復帰)を依頼できます。一般の利用者は削除撤回依頼に、理由を添えて削除維持(keep deleted)あるいは削除撤回(=復帰、undelete)の賛否コメントを入れることができます。

このページはウィキペディアの一部ではありません。 ウィキペディアや他のウィキメディアのプロジェクト群において用いられるフリーのメディア・ファイルの保管庫であるウィキメディア・コモンズの内容についてのページです。ウィキメディア・コモンズは百科事典記事を提供しません。 英語版ウィキペディアにおける記事やその他の内容の削除撤回の要請は、英語版の削除のレビュー (deletion review) にて行ってください。(同様に日本語版ウィキペディアの記事等においては日本語版の削除の復帰依頼を利用して下さい。)

Contents

ファイルが削除された理由を見い出す

始めに, 削除記録 (deletion log) を確認し、ファイルが削除された理由を見つけ出して下さい。 リンク元 (What links here) を参照し、削除されたファイルについて、どのような議論があったかを確認して下さい。もし、あなたがアップロードしたファイルであれば、あなたのトーク(会話ページ)に削除についての説明がないか確認してください。 次に、削除の方針プロジェクトの守備範囲及びライセンシングを再度確認し、コモンズにおいて、そのファイルが許容されないかもしれない理由を調べてください。

削除された理由が明白でない場合、あるいは削除理由に異論がある場合、削除を行った管理者に連絡を取り説明を求めたり、削除理由を否定する新たな事実を示してください。 実行した管理者本人以外でも、活動中の管理者(管理者リスト(言語別))へ連絡を取っても構いません、もし間違いで削除されていた場合は、事態を修正してくれるでしょう。

削除に対する不服申し立て

削除の方針プロジェクトの守備範囲及びライセンシングに正しく基づいた削除が撤回されることはありません。諸方針の修正はそれぞれのノート(議論ページ)で提案することができます。

そのファイルが著作権侵害案件ではなく、現在のプロジェクトの守備範囲をはずれてもいないと信じる場合:

  • そのファイルを削除した管理者と議論を希望することができます。その管理者に詳しい説明を求めたり、復帰を支持する証拠を示すことができます。
  • だれにも直接連絡することを望まない場合や、連絡した管理者が復帰を断った場合、あるいはもっと多くの人に議論参加してほしい場合、このページで削除撤回依頼を出すことができます。
  • そのファイルが、著作権者によるライセンス許諾の証拠がなくて削除された場合、許諾確認プロセスに従ってください。 すでに許諾確認のプロセスを進めている場合、ここで削除撤回を依頼する必要はありません。もし許諾が規則にかなう形で行われた場合、許諾が確認できた段階でファイルは復帰されるでしょう。現在の案件数とボランティアの人数の関係で、何週間かの時間がかかるかもしれませんので、しばらくお待ちください。

一時的な復帰

削除撤回議論を支援するために、あるいはフェアユースを受け入れるプロジェクトへファイルを転送するために、ファイルが一時的に復帰されることがあります。そのような場合は、{{Request temporary undeletion}}(一時的な復帰の依頼) のテンプレートを使って 説明してください。

  1. 削除撤回議論を支援するための一時的復帰の場合、一時復帰が議論に有用な理由を説明してください。あるいは
  2. フェアユースを受け入れるプロジェクトへファイルを転送するための一時的復帰の場合、どのプロジェクトにファイルを転送しようとしているのかを述べて、そのプロジェクトのフェアユース・ステートメントのリンクを貼ってください。

議論の支援のため

一般利用者がファイルを見ないと削除撤回依頼を認めるべきか決めかねる場合、議論を支援するためにファイルを一時的に復帰することができます。ファイルの説明ページ、あるいはその引用で足りる場合は、管理者はファイルの一時復帰を認めないで、代わりに説明ページまたはその引用を提供することがあります。 Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

フェアユースを受け入れるプロジェクトへの転送を可能とするために

英語版ウィキペディアやそのほかのいくつかのウィキメディアのプロジェクトと異なり、コモンズは、fair use|フェアユース のようなフリーでないコンテンツを受け入れません。 削除されたファイルが他のウィキメディアプロジェクトのフェアユース要件を満たす場合、そちらへファイルを転送するために一時的復帰を依頼することができます。通常、このような依頼は(議論なく)即時復帰の対応が可能です。 転送目的で即時復帰されたファイルは二日後に削除されます。一時復帰を依頼するときは、どのプロジェクトに転送するるつもりかを明らかにして、そのプロジェクトのフェアユース・ステートメントをリンクしてください。

フェアユースを受け入れるプロジェクト

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

依頼の手順

まず、ファイルが削除された理由を確認してください。次に、以下の依頼提出方法を読んで、それから提出してください:

  • Subject:(見出し) の箇所には, 適切な件名を入れてください。 単一ファイルの削除撤回依頼の場合、見出しに[[:File:削除されたファイル名.jpg]]</cod>を入れることが推奨されます(リンクするには Fileの前にコロンが必要です)
  • ファイルを特定する あなたが削除撤回依頼するファイルを特定して、イメージリンクを提供してください。正確な名前を知らない場合あ、できるだけたくさん情報を出してください。なにを復帰させたいかについての情報を提供できていない依頼は通告なくアーカイブに移動させられます。
  • 理由を述べる 復帰を行うべき理由を述べます。
  • 依頼に署名する - 4つのチルダ(~~~~)を使って依頼に署名します。コモンズにアカウントを持っているなら、先にログインしてください。問題のファイルをアップロードした本人なら、ログインすることで管理者がファイルを特定する手助けになります。

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

アーカイブ

終了した依頼は毎日アーカイブされます。

現在の依頼

Watch View Edit

File:Ervaren lichaamsbeeld, naar geslacht en naar bmi, bevolking van 18 jaar en ouder, 2014 (in procenten).png

As Natuur12 indicated on Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2019-01#File:Ervaren lichaamsbeeld, naar geslacht en naar bmi, bevolking van 18 jaar en ouder, 2014 (in procenten).png, it was well sourced.

Considering this was a rather poor speedy deletion tag by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 who doesn't understand Dutch and deletion by Jcb, I also request undeletion of everything else in the batch:

If needed, those can go through a regular DR process. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I rechecked several and all of them miss vital source information. E.g. PDF documents with several images in them without any source/authorship information. Jcb (talk) 06:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
No offense but I'm not taking your word on this kind of thing. I've been burned a few too many times on that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
I left some notes behind the file names. Most files if not all files have dubious own work claims. Natuur12 (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@Natuur12: thanks! Files like File:Emigratie vroeger en nu.jpg seem like they are strictly educational, but the quality (hand-written text, no professional-looking illustrations, as far as I can tell from the Google thumbnail) makes it unlikely to be useful. I wonder where the obvious violations for the PDF documents were taken from? I can't see those at all. Knowing that may aid in finding sources for PD-simple files. File:Aandeel lezers en niet-lezers in een week, bevolking van 13 jaar en ouder, naar enkele achtergrondkenmerken.png was not claimed as own work either, but looking anything up is troublesome for deleted files, so a DR would help. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: I left more notes. Strakhov (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
@Strakhov: also thanks! I think it'll take one or more people who understand Dutch and Dutch culture to sort all of these out. I'm willing to go over them in a DR, I think Donald Trung also won't mind. The obvious copyvios Natuur12 identified and Homer could potentially remain deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, most files are just plain garbage and undeleting them would be a waste of resources. The files seem to be part of some middle school project. The copyright violations are low quality teaching material. The non copyright violations are CBR graphs or self created drawings. While the deletion reason for most files is faulty there's little point in undeleting them. (CBS graps exlcuded). Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
@Natuur12: I'd be okay with undeletion of the CBS graphs and leaving everything else. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Reposição de ficheiros de João Justiceiro (3)

Dando prosseguimento aos pedidos de reposição por partes, solicito o restauro destes arquivos, sinalizados como "violação de direitos autorais":

Os quatro primeiros arquivos são desenhos vetoriais de minha autoria baseados em obras de mais de 20 anos que não estão mais registradas em propriedade industrial (pode ser consultado o site do INPI para mais detalhes). O quinto é feito a partir deste arquivo, e os dois últimos são formas textuais simples que não podem ser enquadradas em copyright ({{PD-textlogo}}).

Convido a debater Ankry, Yann, Jmabel e Strakhov, envolvidos nas últimas discussões. João Justiceiro (talk) 23:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Agree. I believe these files are within the scope defined by {{PD-textlogo}}. Érico (talk) 00:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Restore. These seem to have been part of a mass deletion of perfectly OK files uploaded by João Justiceiro. I don't know what's going on here, but so far everything he has brought here to be restored has been valid, and these appear to be, too. We're now up to maybe 30 restorations, maybe more. - Jmabel ! talk 05:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Sim, ainda há mais. João Justiceiro (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Locator maps of Latvian parishes

In deletion request original uploader (re)confirmed that they are the author of the following maps. Also evidence was provided that public source data of these maps is open data. Author has released their maps to public domain, they are a prolific mapmaker and administrator on Latvian Wikipedia. In response to my recent enquiry they say that they a professional cartographer. Years ago they have documented their mapmaking process here. So there seems to be more than enough reason to assume good faith that these maps are not copyright violations.

Nominator in their laconic remarks in turn did not provide any evidence that there are some other non-free maps that these maps might be derived from. Closing admin in their post-closure response doesn't seem to know either why should we doubt about the freedom of these maps. Hopefully this is a misunderstanding and these maps can be restored. Or, if not else, then hopefully now we can shed at least some light on why were these maps deleted, and why shouldn't we delete pretty much all other maps on Commons in similar manner (as we are never 100% sure that everything is alright copyright-wise).

--Pikne 07:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Geologic Map of Mars.pdf

This batch was deleted for copyvio, but it was published by the USGS: [1] Thus, it qualifies for {{PD-USGov-USGS}}.

RockingGeo (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: same as above. A link to appropriate discussion would be welcome. Ankry (talk) 10:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Please be aware that this was part of a mass deletion of mostly blatant copyright violations by this uploader. Another UDR for this batch was already closed as 'not done'. If it turns out that some of the files are fine, I have no problem with undeletion. Jcb (talk) 11:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

File:In Bed With...Sonia Ben Ammar - LOVE.webm

This file was deleted "per nomination", but in the discussion it is shown that the nomination reason is wrong. Please ping me in any reply. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Thats what {{Licensereview}} for. That was missing and now its hard to determine under which license it was published. --JuTa 20:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
It is not that hard. This link [2] was provided in the discussion. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
@JuTa: Any comment about this? Ankry (talk) 08:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
The video isnt shown on the archive link. For me its no proof that the its was published under a free license. --JuTa 09:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Your reasoning for deletion was per nomination, not that there was no proof that it was published under a free license. The reason for nomination has not been proven. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
I've extended the reasons in the DR here. --JuTa 02:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
I have undone your 'extension' as it says at the top "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." Your reasoning makes no sense as the nomination is based on the video being the one in the link. LOVE MAGAZINE did tweet about the video at https://twitter.com/thelovemagazine/status/855009574293823488, but as you can see the video has been taken down on the actual page linked. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
My reasoning makes abloslutly sense. The nomination said: Now I have no idea if this (the licensing) is valid or not. We cannot prove if it was valid or not, because your given archive links does not show the video, so we cannot prove if a cc license ever was connected to the video. --JuTa 13:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Yoga Training In Rishikesh Akshi Yogashala (258662567).jpeg

The nomination was based in "metadata contains Facebook, as source" but clearly is the same author for both files, and it's possible by the law have different versions of the same file, under different licenses. Moreover, the author could always choose to latter publish a file in a more permissive license. So, the justification is not valid.

Gbawden it's not the first time that you do not check the votes and wrongly delete a file of mine. jeff g will always include "delete" in files that I upload, because he loves me and want hard my attention, so you need to pay more attention. ---- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

@Rodrigo.Argenton: Is there an OTRS ticket containing Wikimedia and Facebook users identity confirmation by a highly trusted independent user? We should be able to verify identity even when Facebook account disappears. Ankry (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Ankry,
We have the CC-by version stored at archive.org (258662567), so we have a more powerful manner to prove than even OTRS. Check [3] and [4]. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 01:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
If it was first published online elsewhere before it was posted at 500px, then the 500px link is actually not a proof. De728631 (talk) 14:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
It's the same user, it's a clear case.
If they decided to publish under a cc-by after, it's their decision, and we have proof that they did that.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Files uploaded by TOBELO

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TOBELO

Since I originally hadn't intended to go through this whole DR, I wound up adding a few extra to the initial UDR. Might as well try to undelete what else I can (paintings that have dates) although others in that DR can be undeleted if the admin thinks it should be. Artist died in 1944 so they're now public domain in Brazil. Abzeronow (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

File:ZU Lkw Stadt.jpg

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

von meiner Seite als auch von Seiten des Urhebers wurde kein Fehler gemacht, der zu einer Löschung hätte führen können. Inzwischen wurde deshalb der Vorgang von uns wiederholt mit der Änderung der Bildnamen (zwecks Verdeutlichung): Zapf Berlin Zentrale.jpg / Zapf Lkw Stadt.jpg /Zapf Berlin Brandenburger Tor.jpg Bitte Wiederherstellung vornehmen oder die Neueinstellung zulassen. Gerhard Schuhmacher GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 13:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No free license nor its evidence provided. Only freely licensed images can be stored here; see COM:L for details. www.zapf.de is not a freely licensed site. Reuploading deleted images is against Wikimedia Commons rules. Ankry (talk) 11:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support The "permission" parameter had and entry "Zusendung am 13.06.2017 (A. Krumrey, zapf umzüge)" which is equivalent to {{OTRS pending}}.
@GerhardSchuhmacher: Bei der Einsendung der Genehmigung per Email sollte eine automatische Antwort mit einer Ticket-Nummer für den Vorgang gekommen sein. Wie lautet diese Nummer? Wir können das Bild zeitweilig wieder herstellen, aber die Bearbeitung der Mail durch unsere freiwilligen Mitarbeiter zur Prüfung der Freigabe wird voraussichtlich einige Wochen dauern. Daher kann es passieren, dass das Bild zwischendurch doch wieder gelöscht wird, da die Urheberrechtssituation noch nicht abschließend geklärt ist. De728631 (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info To restore the image we also need a valid license template (which was not provided by the uploader). Ankry (talk) 08:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Kulasekhara kingdom.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The source of the image is Uploader itself. We should not be concerned about the factual accuracy of the data in the image. For reference, another deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Colored vettattnad.jpg by the same user was denied. User:Yann has restored File:Kerala in the Late Middle Ages.jpg which was deleted on the same grounds. We should use {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}} instead. Sreejith K (talk) 20:28, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Please restore File:Location of the kingdom of Zamorins in India.jpg as well. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of two files File:Bonifacio Monument.jpg and File:Bonifacio monument caloocan.JPG

The two files:

- were deleted as a result of the discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/Guillermo Tolentino statues, which stated that the designer of the monument, en:Guillermo Tolentino, died in 1976 and Monumento (as we fondly call it) of en:Caloocan would supposed to be unfree until 2026 (using DATE OF DEATH+50 years equation), being in a No-FOP country. However, the discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bonifacio National Monument (Caloocan City) said otherwise: this monumental structure was commissioned by the government. Quoting from User:Namayan's basis: "The artwork has no copyright at it was commissioned by the Philippine government [1]. As per Philippine Intellectual Property laws "176.1. No copyright shall subsist in any work of the Government of the Philippines.""

However, I wish to have a bit more insight regarding this. Pinging the admin who deleted these files @Lymantria:.JWilz12345 (talk) 04:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

I think there is a step between "commissioned by the government" and "work of the Government", but I am not specialized in Philippine Law. And I can't read the link [5] given in the 2015 discussion, that might fill the gap. And I am afraid my knowledge of Spanish might be insufficient. Perhaps another admin can studie the 2012 and 2015 DR's and decide how to resolve the inconsistency that seems to exist. Lymantria (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Pinging for more editors: @P199:, @Namayan:, etcetera.JWilz12345 (talk) 12:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I can't help here, I don't know the legal difference between "commissioned by the government" and "work of the Government". And the DR's of 2012 and 2015 are no help because there is no discussion at all; they were merely closed according to the 1 opinion given there. --P 1 9 9   13:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Usually, a work of the government would be a work created by a government official, i.e. an employee of the government in the course of duty. A work commissioned by the government, however, means that the government commisioned a third party to create something. The latter work are typically not exempt from copyright since they are not immediate government works. Also in the Philippines, "the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest or otherwise" (Section 176.3). De728631 (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Mike Peel

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Toulouse

This is a war monument from 1928. "the architect was Léon Jaussely (1875-1932). The design and main sculptor was "Raynaud", probably Camille Raynaud (?-?, born at Cordes (Tarn), student of Falguière, already active 1895). " Camile Raynaud died in 1947 https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Raynaud The DR mentioned two others but if these avoid "The sculptor André Abbal (1876-1953) did the warriors, Henri-Raphaël Moncassin (1883-1958) did a figure of a widow and orphan" those elements by sculptors whose contributions are still in copyright in France, this can be undeleted. Pinging @Mike Peel the uploader as a courtesy Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Wow, this takes me back. Thanks for catching this @Abzeronow:! I've restored them (unless anyone disagrees?). The category for this is at Category:Monument aux Combattants de la Haute-Garonne, please could you add more information to monument aux combattants de la Haute-Garonne (Q63762459) (with references) if you can? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info File:Toulouse war memorial 1.jpg & File:Toulouse war memorial 5.jpg do not qualify, IMO (warriors). Ankry (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
@Ankry: Both of those are wide shots, does de minimis apply, or do some parts need blanking out? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
No idea. But I would welcome a third opinion. @Yann: ? Ankry (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Yes, this is OK. It comes under the "unavoidable" rule of the Terreaux case. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
OK. However, I think that we need a warning in such cases, that some DWs (focussing on the warriors in this case) would not be OK. Ankry (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
We already have {{Autotranslate|base=NoFoP-France}}. Do we need something else? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done by Mike Peel. Ankry (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Galeazzo_Maria_Sforza.jpg (2006-12-26 version)

I would like to have a previous (now overloaded) version of File:Galeazzo_Maria_Sforza.jpg undeleted.

  1. Quote @Jdx:: „...It was deleted as duplicate of File:Piero Pollaiuolo Portrait of Galeazzo Maria Sforza.jpg. But IMO it wasn't a duplicate – it was slightly cropped and had different colors/white balance.“
  2. It was picture of the day Template:Potd/2006-12-26. I think this file is relevant for archival reasons. --Jahobr (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
The image was poorly described: eg. no source information, but GA candidate.svg Weak support per above. However, I wouuld welcome another opinion, especially as neither the "duplicate" nominator, nor the deleting admin are active here for few years. Ankry (talk) 08:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Miss Korea 2006 Hyunji Park.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: "‪File:Miss Korea 2006 Hyunji Park.jpg‬". Hello. it is great reluctant to say that Partric asked to remove my picture. this picture is 1000% of mine. On Facebook, i have this picture. too (I opened to the public to prove this for a while. and will change to open to only my friends on Facebook) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=20304882750&set=a.20302082750&type=3&theater

And I found out someone absue of mine. I asked to remove my picture, The blog you found out, https://m.blog.naver.com/zxdasdasd/150100732224 Me, Hyunji Park not Lee ji son. This picture taken by my family. Please help me not to use my picture with other's name via upload my picture with my name. Say2elisha (talk) 00:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

If an image was used elsewhere prior to be uploaded to Commons, we need more reliable free license evidence than an on-wiki uploader's declaration. If none of your earlier publications of this image was under a free license, please follow COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per above: OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 17:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bhagwat Rawat.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is because Bhagwat Rawat - the public figure in the picture, was my grandfather, and the said page on Blogspot took the picture from us (our family album). There is no 'copyright violation' in this picture because we didn't need permission to upload the picture on Wikipedia in the first place. Gulalsalil (talk) 05:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

@Gulalsalil: Are you the photographer? If not, who is/was?
If an image was used elsewhere prior to be uploaded to Commons, we need more reliable free license evidence than an on-wiki uploader's declaration. If none of earlier publications of this image was under a free license, the copyright holder needs to COM:OTRS instructions in order to undelete the photo. Ankry (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per no response. Ankry (talk) 08:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zendaya.jpg

it was my personal editing --Billionaire in training (talk) 10:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)-

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Billionaire in training: You are not allowed to upload images without a formal permission from the copyright holder. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Yann. Ankry (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Canelo Álvarez 2019.jpg

Does not fit the criteria for speedy deletion.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Faren29 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 22 June 2019‎ (UTC)
@Faren29: How does it not fit COM:CSD#F3?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per Jeff. Ankry (talk) 18:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Periodic Table of Cryptocurrencies - Blockchain Categorization.pdf

File has scientific value. And is deleted without reason!

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Periodic Table of Criptocurrencies - Blockchain Categorization.pdf for reference. De728631 (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per the deletion request. This is essentially a huge table that should be coded in Wikitext if used in a Wikipedia, or be coded into Wikisource. The PDF table itself is so large that the file can not just be transcluded in Wikipedia without the font size being realistically readable. Please see also Commons:Project_scope#PDF. De728631 (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jazzafari Fotografia tirada por Ricardo Alevizos.jpg

Boa tarde, Estou a escrever-vos porque retiraram a fotografia do Artista Jazzafari, na informação geral (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jazzafari) Não compreendo o motivo para a terem retirado. A fotografia é o Retrato do Artista João Torres Corado Teixeira Mendes, também conhecido por Jazzafari. Esta cumpre com os requisitos da Wikipedia e Commons, licença livre e Autor da Obra. Tentei fazer outro upload da fotografia mas não consegui. Peço-vos que voltem a colocar a fotografia.

Obrigada
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanagasparotti (talk • contribs) 17:54, 22 June 2019‎ (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Apparently you are not the copyright holder, so we need a permission by email from Jazzafari to verify the free licence. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done per De728631. Ankry (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adam Šafránek.jpg

The photo was deleted even though I am the author of the photo. As a proof, I added a (#wikimedia) hashtag to the caption of the place of where I originally uploaded the photo: https://www.instagram.com/p/Br7_PqDB8zk/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Devler (talk • contribs) 06:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
@Devler: Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This file has no EXIF data. If you are the photographer, please upload the original file from your camera. Thanks, Yann (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Pharaoh2Tone

It apparently stated the content was in violations of copyrights when NONE of the content was copy-written. I would like proof of any of the the content not be authentic. If it was the links, I could send different forms. The back story, credentials, and projects are all verifiable. Pharaoh2Tone (talk) 00:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unused personal picture, user with no useful edit on Commons, blocked indef. on the English Wikipedia, out of scope. In addition, this is not a selfie, so permission from the photographer is needed. Yann (talk) 06:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per log: This is not facebook. --Achim (talk) 07:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 07:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MacOS Catalina Missing Grapher.png

I think this file should not be deleted because I created it by myself. I did not find this on the web.

This common image should not be deleted because I created this file by myself, not found on the web. So it's not copyrighted.
I created this file when I'm trying to edit the article Mac OS Catalina I'm confused why this file is considered copyright since I created this by myself and there's not a similar image on the web.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by David Jiang DB (talk • contribs) 01:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Just because you ‘create’ the image that you uploaded doesn’t mean that it is your image. If it has copyrighted elements, it falls under derivative work and it then depends on how much of the image it is in that help determine if de minimis is applicable, otherwise it is deleted. Bidgee (talk) 01:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
But File:MacOS Catalina Desktop.png is the desktop of the operating system, and it has similar elements such as icons and desktop, but it didn't get deleted.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by David Jiang DB (talk • contribs) 01:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
That has been uploaded only to English Wikipedia as fair-use, not on Commons which cannot have any fair-use work (see Commons:Licensing). Bidgee (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know that. This is the first time I upload files on to commons and I only read the notices on the upload page. I will be careful next time.--David Jiang DB (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)


 Not done: Derivative work, (c) Apple Inc. --Yann (talk) 07:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

File:AURELIUS Group Logo.svg

The logo was taken from the official company website. It is freely downloadable in the Media Section. It is a simple combination of text and graphic. --Neomicro (talk) 08:42, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Well, this is too complex for PD-textlogo. We need a permission from the copyright holder. Or you can upload locally on Wikipedia under fair use if your project allows it. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Dear Yann, thank you for your reply. So if I were to upload it in the German Wikipedia under fair use could it be used in the English as well? Could you direct me to the procedure on which form the copyrights holders permission would have to be in? --Neomicro (talk) 10:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
@Neomicro: No, you should upload it to English Wikipedia (under Fair Use) as well. The copyright holder may send us a free license permission following COM:OTRS procedure. Ankry (talk) 13:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Carta Limotges Aglo.pdf

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carta Limotges Aglo.pdf

Bien bien bien, je ne sais pas comment vous contacter, alors, j'écris ici, et en français... Le fichier que vous avez effacé il y a 3 ans a été par mes petites mains sur A. Illustrator. En quoi il vous pourrait vous poser problème ?

Merci

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiròni B. (talk • contribs) 11:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
@JuTa, Ellin Beltz: This has a free license mention inside. What was the issue? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
I think the problem here was slightly incorrect license used: {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} instead of {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. There is no other mention declaring own work as suggested in the DR. Another problem is the PDF format, not suitable for a single image. I would Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletion if somebody volunteers to convert this map to a more suitable graphic format. Ankry (talk) 17:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
The file was PDF format and has the following history "(change visibility) 22:56, 6 June 2014 NahidSultan talk contribs block deleted page File:Carta Limotges Aglo.pdf (No OTRS permission since 30 April 2014 If you are the copyright holder/author and/or have authorization to publish the file, please email our OTRS team to get the file restored) (view/restore) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/File:Carta_Limotges_Aglo.pdf . Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

File:LR AKA.jpg

This is my picture that the website whatever you have mentioned has used. So, why was this deleted? I'm have the picture with me. Also that is not any website but someone who uploaded from wiki page. Kindly check again. --7leumas (talk) 16:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

@7leumas: Do you still have this 2016 photo in higher quality than 278 × 415? Follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS to verify the license. Thuresson (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Wanda_panorama.jpg

You guys are unnecessarily deleting all my images that I have uploaded even that has been on here for more than 2+ years. Why are you doing such a nonsensical thing? And giving some stupid reasons such that a similar image was found on some other site? What makes you think that they haven't taken the same image from the wiki page/ same image that I originally uploaded?. Please use some common-sense. Reinstate those images and don't unnecessarily take them down without any specific valid reason. --7leumas (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

@7leumas: Due to legal reasons, on-wiki license declaration can be accepted only for images that were never published prior to upload to Wikimedia Commons. Otherwise, either a link to license at the initial publication site is needed, or COM:OTRS permission in the Permission field. Not following this rule is a risk that the image may be deleted at any time. Ankry (talk)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Uploaded to Commons on June 1, 2019. Nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wanda panorama.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Bahnlinien burgaltendorf 1894.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bahnlinien burgaltendorf 1894.png

Based on "This is an excerpt from the Königlich-Preussische Landes-Aufnahme 1892, Messtischblatt 2576 "Essen im Rheinland", scale 1:25,000, published 1894." This sounds like it could be PD-old-assumed Abzeronow (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

File:TSI.jpg

Respected Sir/Madam, Why My Image was deleted? The picture was Made by me as a collage describing that place the page decipts.

Please do consider and Undelete it.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Faizal asan (talk • contribs) 20:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

== [[File:TSI.jpg]] Please undelete my Work,The Image is appropriate represenation about the Place Tenkasi ==

Please undelete my image. This is a collage by adding pictures done by me decipting the imges and themes describing about the place TENKASI. Please do reconsider and undelete it.

Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Faizal asan (talk • contribs) 20:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
@Faizal asan: For a collage, you need to provide a source for all images used. We need to be able to verify license compatibility. Even if all images used are free, making such a collage may be copyright violation due to license incompatibility. Ankry (talk) 05:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket:2019021210005541

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019021210005541 regarding File:Tadashi Kawamata aan het werk in het begijnhof (c) Sarah Bauwens.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Enrico tamburini iris.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2019062310004497 regarding File:Enrico tamburini iris.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

File:2011 Kosice McDonald's bombing.jpg

This picture was deleted under an incorrect premise and misunderstanding, who the image was credited to on news sites. The image was credited to "PZ", "PZ SR" and "policia". All of these terms refer to "Policajny zbor Slovenskej republiky" which is the official name of the Slovak National Police Force. Being a government agency, all image work created by the police in Slovakia is by law in the public domain. (Sec. 7 para. 3 letter b) of the Act no. 618/2003 Coll.)

Uncle sam205 (talk) 04:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question The {{PD-SlovakGov}} template provides the following list of copyright exceptions:
text právneho predpisu, úradné rozhodnutie, verejnú listinu, verejne prístupný register, úradný spis, slovenskú technickú normu vrátane ich prípravnej dokumentácie a prekladu, denné správy a prejavy prednesené pri prerokúvaní vecí verejných
Which of above mentioned categories the image falls into? Ankry (talk) 13:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Christine Clerici.jpg

==[[:File:ChristineClerici_©universitdeparis.jpg]] ==

Hello,

The image "File:Christine Clerici.jpg" is royalty-free. Indeed, the photographer Didier Goupy has transferred the image rights to the Université de Paris.

This is an assignment "all rights assigned".

With kind regards,

GHeron

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GHeronUP (talk • contribs) 09:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
@GHeronUP: We need a proof for that: either direct photographer's declaration, or a copy of the copyright transfer contract together with a free license permission from an authorized representative of the University. See COM:OTRS for instructions. BTW, if copyright belongs to the University, then claiming that the copyright is personal ownership of User:GHeronUP is blatant copyright violation. Ankry (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Fernando González García.jpg

Estimados, Esta imagen es pública y yo, como hijo mayor del artista, tengo los derechos sobre ella y por tanto el poder utilizarla como imagen oficial del artista (mi padre) en Wikipedia. Por tanto, solicito que vuelva a ser restablecida esta imagen. Si es necesario marcarla de alguna forma como Creative Commons, por favor, háganmelo saber. Un saludo,

Fernando González Ruano (Fegorama)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fegorama (talk • contribs) 09:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
  1. @Fegorama: If the image is Public Domain, why did you claim that you own copyright?
  2. For images published elsewhere prior to upload to Wikimedia Commons we cannot rely on uploader's declaration: we need a more reliable evidence of their legal status (PD or free license). Ankry (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Daniel_Borsuk_National_Order_of_Québec.jpg

The image in question is a personal photo that I sent to the order of Quebec under my Artistic name of Alex Marchand.

Please let me know how to correct my editing, as I am new to the commons.

Best,

Alex

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Afeifer (talk • contribs) 18:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)